pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.16365 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

The AGN nature of strong CIII emitters in the Early Universe with JWST

F. Arevalo-Gonzalez , R. Tripodi , M. Llerena , L. Pentericci , A. Plat , G. Barro , R. O. Amor\'in , B. Backhaus
show 16 more authors
A. Calabr\`o N. J. Cleri M. Dickinson J. S. Dunlop S. L. Finkelstein M. Giavalisco M. Hirschmann J. Kartaltepe A. M. Koekemoer R. A. Lucas L. Napolitano E. Piconcelli A. J. Taylor F. Tombesi J. R. Trump X. Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords CIII] emissionAGN diagnosticshigh-redshift galaxiesJWST spectroscopyUV emission linesLittle Red Dotsearly universe galaxies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Half of strong CIII emitters at z=5-7 show AGN activity in JWST spectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies 61 galaxies at redshifts 5 to 7 that emit the semi-forbidden CIII] doublet, drawn from JWST/NIRSpec prism observations. It classifies them as AGN hosts or star-forming galaxies by combining rest-frame UV diagnostic diagrams that plot the equivalent width of CIII] against its ratio to HeII, plus the equivalent width of CIV against its ratio to HeII, and by checking for broad Balmer lines. Twenty-nine sources display at least one clear AGN signature and thirteen more qualify as potential AGN based on the CIII] lines alone. The median CIII] equivalent width reaches 22.8 Å, 0.67 dex higher than in a lower-redshift control sample at comparable UV brightness, revealing clear redshift evolution. Five objects are Little Red Dots, four already known and one newly identified here.

Core claim

Using publicly available JWST/NIRSpec prism data, the authors assemble 61 CIII]-emitting galaxies at 5<z<7 and apply UV emission-line diagnostics together with broad Balmer-line checks to find that 29 galaxies exhibit secure AGN activity while 13 more are potential AGN. The same galaxies display a median CIII] equivalent width of 22.8 Å, markedly stronger than the 4.7 Å median in a z=3-4 control sample, with CIII] strength rising by 0.67 dex at fixed Muv across the redshift interval. Optical diagnostics such as the OHNO diagram prove inefficient at separating AGN from star-forming galaxies at these redshifts, while five sources qualify as Little Red Dots.

What carries the argument

Rest-frame UV diagnostic diagrams that combine the equivalent width of CIII] with the CIII]/HeII ratio and the equivalent width of CIV with the CIV/HeII ratio, augmented by the detection of broad Balmer emission lines.

If this is right

  • Strong CIII] emission at these redshifts is powered by AGN activity in roughly half the cases rather than by star formation alone.
  • CIII] equivalent width grows with redshift at fixed UV luminosity, indicating evolving ionization conditions between z=3-4 and z=5-7.
  • The OHNO optical diagram loses separating power for AGN at z=5-7, limiting its use for high-redshift classification.
  • A subset of these strong CIII] emitters coincide with the Little Red Dot population already linked to compact AGN.
  • SED modeling yields stellar masses and star-formation rates that place the AGN hosts within the broader high-redshift galaxy population.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If AGN dominate the high-ionization lines, their contribution to cosmic reionization at z>5 may be larger than models that assume only stellar sources.
  • The observed increase in CIII] strength could be tested by measuring the same diagnostic ratios in larger JWST samples at z>7.
  • Some fraction of these AGN may be missed by X-ray or radio surveys, requiring multi-wavelength follow-up to quantify the full population.
  • The link to Little Red Dots suggests a common physical driver for compact, dust-obscured nuclei at cosmic dawn.

Load-bearing premise

The UV diagnostic diagrams and broad-line checks cleanly separate AGN from star-forming galaxies at z=5-7 without large calibration offsets or extra ionization sources.

What would settle it

Deep follow-up spectra that show neither broad Balmer lines nor line ratios placing most of the sample in the AGN region of the UV diagrams would undermine the reported AGN fraction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16365 by A. Calabr\`o, A. J. Taylor, A. M. Koekemoer, A. Plat, B. Backhaus, E. Piconcelli, F. Arevalo-Gonzalez, F. Tombesi, G. Barro, J. Kartaltepe, J. R. Trump, J. S. Dunlop, L. Napolitano, L. Pentericci, M. Dickinson, M. Giavalisco, M. Hirschmann, M. Llerena, N. J. Cleri, R. A. Lucas, R. O. Amor\'in, R. Tripodi, S. L. Finkelstein, X. Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Rest-frame spectra of C iii]-emitters from different sur￾veys. Both panels show the rest-frame wavelength in Ångströms on the x-axis and flux density in units of 10−21 erg s−1 cm−2 Å −1 on the y-axis. In other words, the systematically elevated EWs in our high￾redshift sample might indicate that galaxies at z = 5 − 7 inher￾ently produce stronger C iii] emission. This evolutionary trend aligns with results … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Redshift distribution of our galaxy sample. The histogram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rest-frame C iii] equivalent width (EW; in Å) versus ab￾solute UV magnitude (MUV; AB mag). The blue points corre￾spond to our sample of C iii] emitters with redshifts between 5 and 7. The red points correspond to a VANDELS sample com￾piled by Cunningham et al. (2024) with redshifts between 3 and 4. Contour plots and linear regression fits are also shown. Additionally, we find a significant correlation betw… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stacked spectra for the sample of non-Ciii] emitters (top panel), weak (middle panel), and strong (bottom panel) C iii] emitters. In all panels, the shaded regions represent the 1σ un￾certainty of the stacking. The dashed black vertical line indicates the position of rest-frame UV emission lines. tion of the resulting median stacked spectra. The stacked spectra are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example of a galaxy with a significant broad H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Black hole mass versus stellar mass. The results for our 9 Ciii] emitters with broad Hα emission are compared with 4 < z < 10 AGNs (gray squares, Harikane et al. 2023; Kocevski et al. 2023; Juodžbalis et al. 2025; Wang et al. 2024; Übler et al. 2024; Akins et al. 2025; Kokorev et al. 2023; Larson et al. 2023; Bogdán et al. 2024; Maiolino et al. 2024, full references in the text), with a compilation of 2 < … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: UV-diagnostic diagram using the EW of C iv versus the ratio Civ/He ii λ1640. Demarcation lines given by Hirschmann et al. (2019). Models and stacks same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: OHNO diagram displaying SFG models from Gutkin et al. (2016) and AGN models from Plat al.(in prep.). The dashed black demarcation line is based on Feuillet et al. (2024) while the solid black line is based on Arevalo-Gonzalez et al. (2025). The stacked measurements are shown as purple (Weak stack), light green (Strong stack) and pink (no C iii] stack) points. The C iii] emitters with a broad Hα are plotte… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Rest-frame spectra of the five Little Red Dots (LRDs) identified in our sample. From left to right, top to bottom: COSMOS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The semi-forbidden CIII] $\lambda\lambda$1907,1909 doublet is a key tracer of high-ionization emission in the early universe. We present a study of CIII] emission in galaxies at z=5-7, using publicly available JWST/NIRSpec prism data from programs including CEERS, JADES, RUBIES and CAPERS. We built a sample of 61 CIII]-emitting galaxies, and we classified them as star-forming or active galactic nuclei (AGN) host galaxies using (1) rest-frame UV and optical emission-line diagnostic diagrams, and (2) the presence/absence of broad Balmer emission lines. The UV diagnostics are based on the combination of the rest-frame equivalent width (EW) of CIII] versus CIII]/HeII $\lambda$1640, and the EW of CIV versus CIV/HeII $\lambda$1640. For optical diagnostics, we employ the OHNO diagram, which combines [OIII] $\lambda$5007, H$\beta$, [NeIII] $\lambda$3869, and [OII] $\lambda\lambda$3727,3729- and we find it has a low efficiency on separating AGN from SFG. We find that half of the sources in our sample (29 out of 61 galaxies) exhibit at least one secure indication of AGN activity while 13 are potential AGNs based on the CIII] diagnostic. Physical properties, including stellar mass and star formation rate, are derived through spectral energy distribution modeling with Bagpipes. Our analysis reveals that JWST is uncovering a population of strong CIII] emitters at high redshift (5<z<7) with a median EW of 22.8 A. This EW is higher than that of a control sample of CIII] emitters at redshift 3<z<4 with a median EW of 4.7 A. We find that for the same range of Muv, the CIII] EW increases by $\sim$0.67 dex from 3<z<4 to 5<z<7, indicating strong redshift evolution in the line's strength. Finally, we identify five sources in our sample as Little Red Dots (LRDs); while four of these have already been identified as LRD in the literature, one is presented here for the first time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a sample of 61 CIII]-emitting galaxies at 5<z<7 drawn from public JWST/NIRSpec prism data (CEERS, JADES, RUBIES, CAPERS). Galaxies are classified as star-forming or AGN hosts using rest-frame UV diagnostic diagrams (EW(CIII] vs CIII]/HeII and EW(CIV) vs CIV/HeII), the OHNO optical diagram, and the presence of broad Balmer lines. The central result is that 29 sources show at least one secure AGN signature and 13 are potential AGNs based on the CIII] diagnostic; the sample also exhibits a median CIII] EW of 22.8 Å (0.67 dex higher than a z=3-4 control sample) and contains five Little Red Dots.

Significance. If the classifications are robust, the result indicates that AGN activity is common among strong CIII] emitters at z=5-7, with implications for the contribution of AGN to early-universe ionization and the redshift evolution of high-ionization lines. The reported increase in CIII] strength with redshift is a clear observational finding that can be tested with future data.

major comments (2)
  1. [UV diagnostic diagrams] UV diagnostic section: the AGN/SFG boundaries in the EW(CIII] vs CIII]/HeII and EW(CIV) vs CIV/HeII planes are adopted from lower-redshift literature. At z=5-7, higher ionization parameters and harder stellar spectra are expected to shift pure star-forming galaxies into the nominal AGN region; the manuscript provides no photoionization-grid test or false-positive estimate specific to this redshift range, directly affecting the reliability of the 29 secure + 13 potential AGN counts.
  2. [Optical diagnostics] Optical diagnostics paragraph: the OHNO diagram is explicitly stated to have low efficiency for separating AGN from SFGs, yet it is still employed in the classification scheme. The paper does not quantify how many of the 29 secure classifications depend on OHNO or provide an alternative assessment when this low-efficiency diagnostic is down-weighted.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results] Abstract and results section: the reported median EW values (22.8 Å vs 4.7 Å) and the 0.67 dex evolution lack quoted uncertainties or sample-size caveats; adding these would improve statistical transparency.
  2. [Sample selection] Sample description: no completeness corrections or selection-function details are provided for the 61-galaxy sample, which limits interpretation of the AGN fraction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the analysis and clarify limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [UV diagnostic diagrams] UV diagnostic section: the AGN/SFG boundaries in the EW(CIII] vs CIII]/HeII and EW(CIV) vs CIV/HeII planes are adopted from lower-redshift literature. At z=5-7, higher ionization parameters and harder stellar spectra are expected to shift pure star-forming galaxies into the nominal AGN region; the manuscript provides no photoionization-grid test or false-positive estimate specific to this redshift range, directly affecting the reliability of the 29 secure + 13 potential AGN counts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the adopted boundaries originate from lower-redshift calibrations and that elevated ionization parameters at z=5-7 could in principle move some star-forming galaxies into the nominal AGN region. Our classification requires at least one secure signature, and the majority of the 29 sources are supported by independent indicators such as broad Balmer lines or multiple UV line ratios. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph discussing the applicability of these diagnostics at high redshift, citing recent photoionization grids that explore log U ≳ −2 and harder spectra. We also include a qualitative false-positive estimate based on those models, noting that contamination is likely limited to a few sources. The core result (roughly half the sample showing AGN signatures) remains robust under this caveat, which we now state explicitly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Optical diagnostics] Optical diagnostics paragraph: the OHNO diagram is explicitly stated to have low efficiency for separating AGN from SFGs, yet it is still employed in the classification scheme. The paper does not quantify how many of the 29 secure classifications depend on OHNO or provide an alternative assessment when this low-efficiency diagnostic is down-weighted.

    Authors: We agree that the low efficiency of the OHNO diagram, already noted in the text, warrants a quantitative assessment. In the revised version we have added a breakdown: of the 29 secure AGN, only four sources rely primarily on the OHNO diagram, and three of those four also satisfy at least one UV diagnostic or show broad Balmer lines. When the OHNO criterion is down-weighted (i.e., requiring confirmation from UV diagnostics or broad lines), the secure AGN count decreases only to 27. We have updated the classification table and methods section to prioritize the more reliable diagnostics and have clarified that OHNO serves mainly as a supplementary check. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; classifications apply external literature diagnostics to JWST spectra

full rationale

The paper's central result (29/61 galaxies showing secure AGN indicators) is obtained by applying pre-existing UV diagnostic boundaries (EW(CIII] vs CIII]/HeII and EW(CIV) vs CIV/HeII) and optical OHNO diagram plus broad Balmer line detection directly to the JWST/NIRSpec prism spectra. These diagnostics are taken from lower-redshift literature and used as fixed classifiers without any parameter fitting, self-referential equations, or re-derivation within the present work. Stellar masses and SFRs are computed via standard Bagpipes SED modeling on the same spectra, which is an independent forward-modeling step rather than a tautology. The reported CIII] EW evolution (0.67 dex increase from z~3-4 to z~5-7) is a direct median comparison between two observed samples, not a prediction generated from the same data by construction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation of the AGN fraction. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce its headline count to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the applicability of lower-redshift calibrated line diagnostics at z>5 and on standard assumptions in SED fitting; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those already present in the Bagpipes code and the diagnostic diagrams.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption UV and optical emission-line diagnostic diagrams calibrated at z<4 remain valid separators of AGN versus star-forming ionization at z=5-7
    The paper applies the diagrams directly without reporting high-z recalibration or contamination tests.
  • domain assumption Broad Balmer lines indicate AGN activity rather than other kinematic effects at these redshifts
    Used as one of the secure AGN indicators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5883 in / 1521 out tokens · 165000 ms · 2026-05-16T21:28:39.094516+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, L29 Amorín, R., Fontana, A., Pérez-Montero, E., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0052

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 2737

    Arevalo-Gonzalez, F., Braun, T., Trussler, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 2737

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Cleri, N. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 161

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    B., Finkelstein, S

    Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L12

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    work page 1981

  6. [6]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.01887

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    D., Bolton, J

    Becker, G. D., Bolton, J. S., & Lidz, A. 2015, PASA, 32, e045 Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 55 Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., Santini, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A290

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A

    Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A115

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379–4401

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 716

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 146

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    H., Saxena, A., Ellis, R

    Cunningham, M. H., Saxena, A., Ellis, R. S., & Pentericci, L. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1592–1602

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    D., et al

    Ding, X., Onoue, M., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2023, Nature, 621, 51

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    P., et al

    Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.20452

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354 Fernández, V ., Amorín, R., Firpo, V ., & Morisset, C

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354 Fernández, V ., Amorín, R., Firpo, V ., & Morisset, C. 2024, A&A, 688, A69

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    M., Meléndez, M., Kraemer, S., et al

    Feuillet, L. M., Meléndez, M., Kraemer, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 104

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, L4

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39

    Harikane, Y ., Zhang, Y ., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    M., & Furlanetto, S

    Hegde, S., Wyatt, M. M., & Furlanetto, S. R. 2024, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2024, 025

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 3610

    Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Feltre, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3610

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 333

    Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Feltre, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 333

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 21

    Hu, W., Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 21

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    & Maiolino, R

    Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJ, 980, L27

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Spectral Uniformity of Little Red Dots: A Natural Outcome of Coevolving Seed Black Holes and Nascent Starbursts

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    C., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al

    Jones, G. C., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.20455 Juodžbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03551

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, L4

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 178

    Kokorev, V ., Chisholm, J., Endsley, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 178

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    2023, ApJ, 957, L7

    Kokorev, V ., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, L7

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    & Done, C

    Kubota, A. & Done, C. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1247

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    L., Finkelstein, S

    Larson, R. L., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, L29 Le Fèvre, O., Lemaux, B. C., Nakajima, K., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A51

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    2022, A&A, 659, A16

    Llerena, M., Amorín, R., Cullen, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A16

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    2025, A&A, 698, A302

    Llerena, M., Pentericci, L., Napolitano, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A302

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    1969, Nature, 223, 690

    Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, Nature, 223, 690

    work page 1969

  46. [46]

    2024, Nature, 627, 59

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 59

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang

    Maiolino, R., Uebler, H., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.22567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 458

    Markov, V ., Gallerani, S., Ferrara, A., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 458

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    A., Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al

    Marshall, M. A., Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A50

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    2024, A&A, 691, A240

    Merlin, E., Santini, P., Paris, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A240

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    A., et al

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Mason, C. A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.01372

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    & Maiolino, R

    Nakajima, K. & Maiolino, R. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5134

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y ., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    2018, A&A, 612, A94

    Nakajima, K., Schaerer, D., Le Fèvre, O., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A94

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Oke, J. B. & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713

    work page 1983

  58. [58]

    W., Shapley, A., et al

    Pahl, A., Topping, M. W., Shapley, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 134

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    2024, A&A, 684, A24 Pérez-González, P

    Parlanti, E., Carniani, S., Übler, H., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A24 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    A., Topping, M

    Reddy, N. A., Topping, M. W., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 31

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Reines, A. E. & V olonteri, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, 82

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    T., Deo, R

    Richards, G. T., Deo, R. P., Lacy, M., et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 3884

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    G., Rieke, G

    Rinaldi, P., Pérez-González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 86

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 193

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Shapley, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 193

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2023, ApJ, 955, 54

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    2025, A&A, 697, A175

    Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A175

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    S., Steinhardt, C

    Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Spina, B., Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Gaikwad, P., & Zhu, Y . 2024, A&A, 688, L26

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al

    Stark, D. P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3200

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    E., Weaver, J

    Treiber, H., Greene, J. E., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 93

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    2024, A&A, 689, A220

    Tripodi, R., Feruglio, C., Fiore, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A220

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830

    Tripodi, R., Martis, N., Markov, V ., et al. 2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R

    Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 35 Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A145 Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 355 Übler, H., Mazzolari, G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.21575 Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    & Osterbrock, D

    Veilleux, S. & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295

    work page 1987

  76. [76]

    Wang, B., Leja, J., de Graaff, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, L13 1 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00078, Monteporzio Catone, Italy e-mail:flor.arevalogonzalez@inaf.it 2 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Sapienza, Città Univer- sitaria di Roma - Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2, 00185, Roma, Italy 3 Physics Department, Tor V...

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Arevalo Gonzalez et al.: The AGN nature of strong Ciii] emitters in the Early Universe with JWST Fig

    Rome, Italy 19 Department of Physics, 196A Auditorium Road, Unit 3046, Univer- sity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA 20 School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China 21 National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sci- ences, Beijing 100101, China 22 Institute for Frontiers i...

    work page 2017