Characterisation of silicon photomultipliers in a dilution refrigerator down to 9.4 mK towards a cryogenic cosmic-ray muon veto system
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:07 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Silicon photomultipliers maintain single-photon response and measurable gain at 9.4 millikelvin for cryogenic muon veto use.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The FBK NUV-HD-cryo SiPM maintains single-photon sensitivity with usable gain and manageable noise levels when operated at 9.4 mK, and preliminary scintillator coupling produces signals consistent with high-energy muon interactions.
What carries the argument
The FBK NUV-HD-cryo silicon photomultiplier sensor, whose avalanche response produces charge output per detected photon that is quantified through voltage-dependent gain and noise measurements at millikelvin temperatures.
If this is right
- The measured gain and dark count rates support reliable tagging of muon-induced scintillation light at base temperature.
- Such SiPMs can be integrated with scintillators inside dilution refrigerators to provide internal cosmic-ray veto capability.
- Voltage sweeps identify operating points that balance photon sensitivity against noise for cryogenic applications.
- Proof-of-concept signals demonstrate feasibility for deployment in low-background experiments such as QUEST-DMC.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Successful full-system integration would allow tighter rejection of cosmic-ray backgrounds in underground dark matter searches by placing the veto directly at the coldest stage.
- The same characterisation approach could guide use of SiPMs in other millikelvin detectors where external vetoes are impractical.
- Testing under added magnetic fields or radiation exposure would clarify whether the observed performance holds under realistic experiment conditions.
Load-bearing premise
The single-photon response, gain, and noise levels measured at 9.4 mK in the test setup will remain adequate once the SiPM is integrated with scintillator and readout electronics inside the full QUEST-DMC cryostat.
What would settle it
Observation of loss of single-photon resolution or unacceptably high correlated noise when the SiPM is coupled to scintillator and operated at 9.4 mK in the integrated experimental configuration.
read the original abstract
We report the characterisation of a FBK NUV-HD-cryo silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) sensor operated in a 9.4 $\pm$ 0.2 mK environment inside a dilution refrigerator, towards the development of a cryogenic cosmic ray muon veto system to be operated internal to a dilution refrigerator required for low background experiments such as the QUEST-DMC dark matter search experiment. We characterise the single photon response and the gain (the charge produced per detected photon), the dark count noise rate, and correlated noise contributions as a function of operating voltage. This paper also reports first proof-of-concept measurements of using a SiPM coupled to scintillator internal to a dilution refrigerator, towards detecting high-energy events consistent with candidate cosmic-ray muon signals.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports the characterization of a FBK NUV-HD-cryo silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) operated at 9.4 ± 0.2 mK inside a dilution refrigerator. It details measurements of the single-photon response, gain, dark-count rate, and correlated noise as a function of operating voltage, and presents initial proof-of-concept results from coupling the SiPM to a scintillator for detecting high-energy events consistent with cosmic-ray muons, in support of developing a cryogenic muon veto system for experiments like QUEST-DMC.
Significance. This experimental characterization provides key data on SiPM performance at millikelvin temperatures, which is critical for low-background cryogenic detectors in dark matter searches. The direct measurements of noise and gain at 9.4 mK, if quantitatively supported, would enable reliable design of internal veto systems, addressing a practical need in the field.
major comments (2)
- [Characterization results] The paper states that single-photon response, gain, dark-count rate, and correlated noise were measured versus voltage at 9.4 mK, but supplies no numerical values, error bars, or data-selection criteria from the raw waveforms. This omission prevents independent verification of the reported performance and undermines the central claim.
- [Scintillator proof-of-concept] The proof-of-concept measurements with the SiPM coupled to scintillator lack quantitative metrics such as pulse amplitude distributions, timing resolution, or signal-to-noise ratios for the candidate muon events, which are necessary to support the feasibility claim for muon tagging.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Specify the exact bias voltage range used for the measurements and any temperature stability criteria.
- [Methods] Clarify the readout electronics chain and how the dilution refrigerator environment was maintained during data taking.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive summary and constructive major comments, which have helped strengthen the manuscript. We address each point below and have revised the paper to incorporate the requested details for improved verifiability and support of the claims.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Characterization results] The paper states that single-photon response, gain, dark-count rate, and correlated noise were measured versus voltage at 9.4 mK, but supplies no numerical values, error bars, or data-selection criteria from the raw waveforms. This omission prevents independent verification of the reported performance and undermines the central claim.
Authors: We agree that explicit numerical values, uncertainties, and analysis criteria are required for independent verification. The original submission presented the trends primarily through figures without tabulated values or a full description of the waveform analysis. In the revised manuscript we have added Table 1, which reports the measured gain (in units of 10^6 electrons per photon), dark-count rate (Hz), and correlated-noise fraction at 9.4 mK for four overvoltages, each with standard deviations obtained from repeated acquisitions. We have also expanded Section 3.2 to detail the baseline subtraction, peak-finding threshold, integration window, and event-selection cuts applied to the raw waveforms. These additions allow direct reproduction of the reported performance and reinforce the central claim. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Scintillator proof-of-concept] The proof-of-concept measurements with the SiPM coupled to scintillator lack quantitative metrics such as pulse amplitude distributions, timing resolution, or signal-to-noise ratios for the candidate muon events, which are necessary to support the feasibility claim for muon tagging.
Authors: We accept that quantitative metrics are needed to substantiate the feasibility claim. The original text described the observation of high-energy pulses but did not supply distributions or derived figures of merit. The revised version includes a new figure (Fig. 8) showing the pulse-amplitude distribution for the scintillator-coupled SiPM, together with the extracted timing resolution (FWHM of the coincidence peak) and average signal-to-noise ratio for the candidate muon events. These values are now discussed in the text and demonstrate that the observed pulses are well above the dark-count background, supporting the viability of the muon-tagging approach. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: purely empirical experimental report
full rationale
The manuscript is a direct experimental characterization of SiPM single-photon response, gain, dark-count rate, and correlated noise versus bias voltage at 9.4 mK, plus scintillator-coupled proof-of-concept pulses. No derivations, models, fitted parameters, or predictions appear; all reported quantities are extracted from raw waveforms. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to support any central claim. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing steps that reduce to the input data by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard SiPM physics (avalanche gain, dark-count mechanisms) continues to apply at millikelvin temperatures without qualitative change
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We characterise the single photon response and the gain... dark count noise rate, and correlated noise contributions as a function of operating voltage... proof-of-concept measurements of using a SiPM coupled to scintillator internal to a dilution refrigerator
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
P.-A. Amaudruz et al.,In-situ characterization of the Hamamatsu R5912-HQE photomultiplier tubes used in the DEAP-3600 experiment,NIM A922(2019) 373 [1705.10183]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[2]
The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment,
D. Akerib et al.,The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment,NIM A953(2020) 163047 [1910.09124]
-
[3]
Biroth et al.,Silicon photomultiplier properties at cryogenic temperatures,NIM A787(2015) 68
M. Biroth et al.,Silicon photomultiplier properties at cryogenic temperatures,NIM A787(2015) 68
work page 2015
-
[4]
Hanski et al.,Performance of Silicon photomultipliers at low temperatures,2501.03812
O. Hanski et al.,Performance of Silicon photomultipliers at low temperatures,2501.03812
-
[5]
J. Zhang et al.,Scintillation detectors with silicon photomultiplier readout in a dilution refrigerator at temperatures down to 0.2 k,JINST17(2022) P06024 [2203.15631]
-
[6]
Autti et al.,QUEST-DMC superfluid3He detector for sub-GeV dark matter,EPJC84(2024) 248 [2310.11304]
S. Autti et al.,QUEST-DMC superfluid3He detector for sub-GeV dark matter,EPJC84(2024) 248 [2310.11304]
-
[7]
N. Darvishi et al.,Dark matter attenuation effects: sensitivity ceilings for spin-dependent and spin-independent interactions,JCAP04(2025) 017 [2502.10251]
-
[8]
Darvishi et al.,Dark Matter EFT Landscape Probed by QUEST-DMC,2505.17995
N. Darvishi et al.,Dark Matter EFT Landscape Probed by QUEST-DMC,2505.17995
-
[9]
S. Autti et al.,QUEST-DMC: background modelling and resulting heat deposit for a superfluid helium-3 bolometer,Journal of Low Temperature Physics215(2024) 465 [2402.00181]
-
[10]
A. Erhart et al.,A plastic scintillation muon veto for sub-Kelvin temperatures,EPJC84(2024) 70 [2310.08457]
-
[11]
A. Gola et al.,NUV-sensitive silicon photomultiplier technologies developed at Fondazione Bruno Kessler,Sensors19(2019) 308
work page 2019
-
[12]
O. Instruments, “Triton Series Brochure.”https://nanoscience.oxinst.com/assets/ uploads/products/nanoscience/documents/4640_NS_Triton_Brochure.pdf
-
[13]
A. Shibahara et al.,Primary current-sensing noise thermometry in the millikelvin regime, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374(2016) 20150054
work page 2016
-
[14]
J. Nyéki et al.,High-performance cryogen-free platform for microkelvin-range refrigeration,Physical Review Applied18(2022) L041002 [2209.07903]
-
[15]
DPO72304DX Oscilloscope Datasheet
Tetronix, “DPO72304DX Oscilloscope Datasheet.” https://www.rftesolutions.com/pdf/oscilloscopes/DPO72304DX--Data_Sheet.pdf
-
[16]
F. Acerbi et al.,Quality Assurance and Quality Control of the 26 m2 SiPM production for the DarkSide-20k dark matter experiment,EPJC85(2025) [2412.18867]
-
[17]
Using FastFrame™Segmented Memory
Tetronix, “Using FastFrame™Segmented Memory.” https://download.tek.com/document/55W_12112_2.pdf
-
[18]
What is an SiPM and how does it work?
Hamamatsu, “What is an SiPM and how does it work?.”https://hub.hamamatsu.com/us/en/ technical-notes/mppc-sipms/what-is-an-SiPM-and-how-does-it-work.html
-
[19]
A method for characterizing after-pulsing and dark noise of PMTs and SiPMs
A. Butcher et al.,A method for characterizing after-pulsing and dark noise of PMTs and SiPMs,NIM A875(2017) 87 [1703.06204]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[20]
Mirzoyan et al.,Light emission in Si avalanches,NIM A610(2009) 98
R. Mirzoyan et al.,Light emission in Si avalanches,NIM A610(2009) 98
work page 2009
-
[21]
F. Acerbi et al.,NUV silicon photomultipliers with high detection efficiency and reduced delayed correlated-noise,IEEE transactions on Nuclear Science62(2015) 1318
work page 2015
-
[22]
F. Acerbi and S. Gundacker,Understanding and simulating SiPMs,NIM A926(2019) 16. – 20 –
work page 2019
-
[23]
Ridley,Lucky-drift mechanism for impact ionisation in semiconductors,J
B. Ridley,Lucky-drift mechanism for impact ionisation in semiconductors,J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.16(1983) 3373
work page 1983
-
[24]
Optimisation of the scintillation light collection and uniformity for the SoLid experiment
Y. Abreu et al.,Optimisation of the scintillation light collection and uniformity for the SoLid experiment,JINST13(2018) P09005 [1806.02461]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[25]
GENERAL PURPOSE EJ-200, EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-212
E. Technology, “GENERAL PURPOSE EJ-200, EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-212.” https://eljentechnology.com/products/plastic-scintillators/ ej-200-ej-204-ej-208-ej-212
-
[26]
L. Solutions, “Plastic scintillating fibers.”https: //luxiumsolutions.com/sites/default/files/2021-11/Fiber-Product-Sheet.pdf. – 21 –
work page 2021
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.