Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 111 references

Non-perturbative effects of short-range spatial correlations at the two-particle level

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Short-range spin fluctuations shift the breakdown of perturbation theory to lower interaction strengths in the two-dimensional Hubbard model.

desk verdict Solid formal extension of the vertex-divergence program to CDMFT, with a credible but not yet cluster-size-converged picture of how short-range AF fluctuations lower the first divergence line. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.17716 v1 pith:6JWQ24FQ submitted 2025-12-19 cond-mat.str-el

Michael Meixner , Matthias Reitner , Thomas Schäfer , Alessandro Toschi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.30.+h71.27.+a71.10.Fd
keywords cellulardynamicalmean-fieldtheoryBethe-SalpeterequationvertexdivergencesHubbardmodelMotttransitionshort-rangecorrelationsspinfluctuationschargesusceptibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that, once short-range spatial correlations are included beyond a purely local description, the breakdown of self-consistent perturbation theory—signalled by a divergence of the two-particle irreducible charge vertex—occurs at smaller Coulomb repulsion U than in dynamical mean-field theory. Using cellular dynamical mean-field theory on a 2x2 cluster, the authors derive the full Bethe-Salpeter formalism in all channels, verify it with Ward identities, and compute the divergence line across the temperature-interaction phase diagram. They further identify the change of sign of an eigenvalue of the generalized charge susceptibility as the essential prerequisite for the Mott metal-insulator transition and for phase-separation instabilities at larger U. If correct, the result reframes the physics of the 2D Hubbard model: non-local antiferromagnetic fluctuations actively prepare the charge sector for the Mott transition, not merely accompany it.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-particle irreducible charge vertex Γ_ch of the cluster impurity, extracted from the cluster generalized susceptibility via the inverse Bethe-Salpeter equation. The authors derive explicit real-space BSE expressions for the charge, spin, and particle-particle channels within CDMFT, together with Ward identities that benchmark the calculation. The divergence of Γ_ch corresponds to a vanishing eigenvalue of the generalized charge susceptibility of the impurity, and the lattice response is built from the same vertex through a cluster-local BSE with a Fourier periodization. A strong-coupling approximation of the lattice bubble difference t²_eff,q is used to turn the

What would settle it

Compute the first vertex-divergence line with a larger cluster (e.g., 4x4 or 8x8 CDMFT) at the same temperatures and interaction range, or with an alternative periodization scheme that enforces momentum conservation in the bubble. If the divergence line shifts back toward the DMFT line, or if the eigenvalue zero-crossing no longer precedes the Mott transition, the central claim would be a finite-cluster artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the first divergence of the two-particle irreducible charge vertex Γ_ch in CDMFT sits systematically below the DMFT divergence line at intermediate and low temperatures, and that this downward shift is caused by short-range transverse spin fluctuations. The authors show that removing the non-local spin-transverse diagrams from the vertex moves the divergence line back toward higher U, flattening its distinctive 'belly' shape. They also find that the eigenvalue of the generalized charge susceptibility that drives the vertex divergence must cross zero and become negative before the Mott transition can occur at larger U; this same eigenvalue then controls the divergenc

Load-bearing premise

The mapping of cluster two-particle quantities onto the lattice assumes that all sites inside the cluster are equivalent, even though the cluster Green's function is not translationally invariant; if this periodization distorts the lattice response, the downward shift of the divergence line could be an artifact of the 2x2 cluster rather than a real physical effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the divergence line is genuinely lower in CDMFT, then perturbation-theory-based methods become unreliable at weaker interactions in two dimensions than previously expected, and the regime of 'strong correlations' is broader than the local picture suggests.
  • The identification of the eigenvalue sign change as a necessary prerequisite for the Mott transition implies that any successful non-perturbative theory of the 2D Hubbard model must reproduce this zero-crossing before the transition, not merely the transition itself.
  • The anti-symmetric frequency structure of the critical eigenvector explains why the uniform charge response stays finite at the half-filled Mott transition even though the generalized susceptibility diverges, resolving a long-standing puzzle.
  • The strong-coupling threshold derived from t²_eff,q provides a practical way to predict the location of the Mott transition from cluster impurity data alone, without full lattice diagonalization.
  • Because the same mechanism drives phase-separation instabilities at finite doping, the result constrains the shape of the coexistence region in cluster DMFT phase diagrams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If short-range spin fluctuations lower the vertex-divergence line, then in the thermodynamic limit the first divergence line may begin at U=T=0 with an exponential onset, as the authors speculate; this could be tested with larger clusters or diagrammatic Monte Carlo in the paramagnetic phase.
  • The finding strengthens the analogy between vertex divergences and local-moment formation: in 2D, the relevant 'local' moment is spatially extended across nearest neighbors, so cluster size should systematically control the divergence scale—a prediction one could verify by comparing 2x2 and 4x4 clusters at fixed temperature.
  • The same eigenvalue crossing that precedes the Mott transition may also enhance electron-phonon coupling in 2D, as the authors hint; a concrete test would be to compute the phonon self-energy using the CDMFT charge vertex and look for a divergent tendency near the vertex-divergence line.
  • The periodization ambiguity suggests that a translation-invariant alternative (e.g., a DCA-like BSE with enforced momentum conservation) should produce a different divergence line; comparing the two periodizations would isolate the true non-local effect from the cluster-geometry artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a two-particle Bethe-Salpeter formalism for cellular dynamical mean-field theory (CDMFT) on a real-space 2×2 cluster, including Ward identities in all channels and a detailed particle-particle BSE derivation. It computes the first divergence line of the two-particle irreducible charge vertex for the 2D Hubbard model at half-filling and finds that, relative to DMFT, the divergence occurs at systematically lower interactions, which it attributes to short-range antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations (analyzed via a single-boson-exchange decomposition). The paper then studies the Mott transition region at the two-particle level, showing that a single eigenvalue of the generalized charge susceptibility diverges at the transition, and argues that a sign change of the corresponding cluster-impurity eigenvalue—the same event as the vertex divergence—is a necessary prerequisite for the Mott transition and phase-separation instabilities. The work also connects the strong-coupling approximation of the lattice bubble to an effective hopping amplitude t2_eff,q.

Significance. If the central numerical claims hold, the paper is a significant contribution: it provides a consistent and carefully benchmarked two-particle CDMFT framework, with Ward identities and applied-field checks, and it extends the DMFT vertex-divergence program to include short-range spatial correlations. The formal BSE/Ward-identity sections are carefully derived and the small-cluster results are benchmarked against DiagMC and larger-cluster data, which increases credibility. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction: in CDMFT, the charge-vertex divergence line is shifted to lower U than in DMFT, and the same eigenvalue sign change precedes the Mott transition. The machine-checkable derivations and reproducible benchmarks are notable strengths. However, the numerical support for the 'systematic' shift and the 'essential prerequisite' claim rests entirely on a single 2×2 cluster, and this is load-bearing for the central assertions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 5 and §III.A] The central claim that the vertex divergence line occurs 'systematically' at lower interactions in CDMFT than DMFT is supported only for a single cluster size (Nc=2×2). The paper's own Fig. 4 shows that the 2×2 cluster has a substantially higher Néel temperature than 8×8 CDMFT, so the short-range AF fluctuations invoked to explain the lowering may be quantitatively overestimated by the perfect-nesting geometry of the 2×2 plaquette. Without a cluster-size scaling test (e.g., 4×4 CDMFT at selected temperatures, or at least a systematic discussion of the 8×8 benchmark data), the assertion that this is a robust property of short-range correlations rather than a finite-size artifact is not established. The authors do discuss the isolated-cluster comparison, but that is a different limit and does not control the imprint of the embedding bath on the 2×2 geometry.
  2. [§IV.B, Eqs. (44)–(48)] The derivation of the necessary condition for the MIT relies on projecting onto the leading lattice eigenvector V∞ at Uc2. Equation (47) sums over impurity eigenvalues Ei with projections P∞(Xi). The plot in Fig. 7 shows that one eigenvalue E1 dominates at Uc2, but the subsequent tracking of X1U as a function of U (green line) must be protected against eigenvalue crossing or level repulsion. The authors state that they follow the eigenvector with 'largest overlap' with X1^Uc2, but the numerical value of that overlap is not given. If the overlap is not close to 1, the 'necessary prerequisite' conclusion could be weakened. Please provide the overlap values or a more quantitative tracking criterion. In addition, the inversion leading to Eq. (48), where (t2_q)^{-1} is placed on the left-hand side, should be justified more carefully; the strong-coupling approximation t2_eff,q is introduced in
  3. [§II.B, Eq. (14) and §III.A] The paper notes after Eq. (14) that the reciprocal-lattice mapping 'implicitly assumes an equivalence of each atom, which is strictly speaking an approximation.' The reader's report raised the concern that this periodization could bias the lattice response. In this paper, the central vertex-divergence line (Fig. 5) is computed directly from the impurity cluster before periodization, and the eigenvalue necessary condition in §IV.B also uses the impurity cluster and the superlattice equation without the reciprocal-lattice mapping. Thus the periodization caveat is less load-bearing for the main claims than it could appear. However, the paper should state this explicitly, since the abstract and §IV.A refer to 'two-particle CDMFT' without clarifying that the key divergence line is a cluster (not periodized) quantity. The periodization mainly affects which specific eigenvalue is identified in
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II.C, Fig. 4] The Ward identity check is shown for only one orbital combination and one parameter point. It would be helpful to state that the Ward identity was verified for all orbital combinations and for the parameter range used in the phase diagram, especially in the strong-coupling regime near the MIT.
  2. [§III.B, Eq. (34)] The notation 'w.o. sp' in Fig. 5 is defined in the text, but the orange dashed line's exact construction (subtraction of all non-local spin-transverse SBE diagrams) could be re-stated more clearly in the caption. The same applies to the yellow dot-dashed line in the left panel of Fig. 5.
  3. [§IV.B, Eq. (43)] The strong-coupling approximation t2_eff,q is written as a 16×16 matrix in App. B2. The main text should mention that the approximation is diagonal in Matsubara frequency and that it is valid when the self-energy is large compared to the hopping, as stated in the text, but the limits of this validity for the intermediate-coupling regime T=1/15t, U≈5.9t should be discussed.
  4. [Fig. 6] The labels in Fig. 6c) and d) are small and difficult to read. Consider enlarging the eigenvector plots or providing a separate panel for the leading eigenvector structure.
  5. [General, typos] There are a few typos and small errors: in App. A 'estaimated' should be 'estimated' and 'plance' should be 'plane'; in Fig. 9 caption 'T=0/15t' should presumably be 'T=1/15t'; in the references, some entries are incomplete (e.g., Ref. [29] has missing page numbers).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CDMFT vertex-divergence and eigenvalue-prerequisite results are derived from the BSE formalism and benchmarked against external methods.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical claim—that the first charge-vertex divergence in CDMFT occurs at lower U than in DMFT—is a direct output of the cluster BSE calculation, not an input. The divergence is located from Γ_ch = (1/T^2)[(χ_ch)^-1 − (χ_0)^-1] (Eq. 11), and the CDMFT cluster impurity is solved by CT-INT with the lattice-to-cluster mapping fixed by the CDMFT self-consistency. The interpretation that short-range antiferromagnetic fluctuations cause the shift is tested by a controlled subtraction of non-local spin-transverse SBE diagrams (Eq. 34), which is a diagnostic manipulation, not a fitted prediction. The eigenvalue sign-change that the abstract calls an 'essential prerequisite' is indeed analytically the same event as the vertex divergence through Eq. (11), but the paper does not stop there: it derives a necessary condition for the Mott instability via Eqs. (45)–(47), showing that a diverging lattice charge response at U_c2 forces at least one cluster-impurity eigenvalue to be negative, while the same eigenvalue starts positive at weak coupling and therefore must cross zero. This is a mathematical consequence of the BSE plus the spectral decomposition, not an assumption smuggled in as a result. The determination of U_c2 is anchored to the thermodynamic double-occupancy discontinuity and to the lattice charge response, and the BSE response is benchmarked against applied-field calculations and external DiagMC/8x8-CDMFT data. Self-citations are used for background context (e.g., the Luttinger-Ward interpretation of vertex divergences) and for the SBE framework, but the load-bearing BSE derivation, the numerical CDMFT data, and the eigenvalue analysis are self-contained in this paper. The lack of cluster-size scaling for 2x2 CDMFT is a finite-size/correctness concern, not a circularity: the derivation would be unchanged if the cluster were larger, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Overall, no step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The formal BSE derivation is self-contained, but the numerical claims lean on CDMFT's cluster-locality and periodization assumptions, a strong-coupling expansion near the MIT, and fitted interpretive quantities (T_K, spectral extrapolation). No new physical entities are introduced; the analysis uses existing quantities (vertex, generalized susceptibility, SBE diagrams).

free parameters (2)
  • Kondo temperature T_K = T_K ≈ 0.14t at U=4.8t; estimated per (U,T)
    Determined by fitting the impurity on-site magnetic response to the universal Kondo response (Appendix A). Used to label the low-T regime in Fig. 5, but not used to adjust the central divergence-line calculation.
  • A(ω=0) extrapolation polynomial = third-order polynomial in Matsubara frequency
    The spectral weight at zero frequency is obtained by a third-order polynomial extrapolation of G(iν) (footnote, Sec. III B). This is an interpretive numerical procedure, not a load-bearing physical parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CDMFT is a Φ-derivable, conserving approximation: the superlattice and the impurity problem share the same Baym-Kadanoff functional, so one- and two-particle quantities satisfy Ward identities.
    Sec. II B; this is the foundation for using the impurity vertex in the lattice BSE and for the Ward-identity benchmarks.
  • domain assumption Cluster-local two-particle approximation: the lattice irreducible vertex equals the 2x2 impurity vertex, and the periodization of Eq. (14) assumes equivalence of each atom even though the cluster Green's function is not translational invariant.
    Sec. II B, after Eq. (13); the authors explicitly note this is an approximation.
  • domain assumption The CT-INT impurity solver produces converged, unbiased estimates of the two-particle quantities over the Matsubara grids used.
    Sec. II A and App. C; no sign-problem or truncation-error analysis is shown.
  • domain assumption The first divergence of Γ_ch marks the breakdown of self-consistent perturbation theory and is a reliable indicator of strong correlations.
    Sec. III, citing Refs. [1,7,8,21,27]; the paper relies on this established interpretation to define its central object of study.
  • domain assumption The strong-coupling expansion of the lattice bubble to second order in the hopping ε_k gives a valid approximation for t2_eff near the Mott transition.
    App. B 2, Eqs. (B14-B22); the expansion assumes the self-energy dominates the hopping in the lattice Green's function.
  • standard math The eigenvalues of the generalized charge susceptibility evolve continuously with U, so a sign change implies a crossing through zero.
    Used in Sec. IV to equate the change-of-sign prerequisite with a vertex divergence; assumes no discontinuous eigenvalue jump over the parameter range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-perturbative effects of short-range spatial correlations at the two-particle level." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6JWQ24FQ

@misc{pith2026251217716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-perturbative effects of short-range spatial correlations at the two-particle level},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6JWQ24FQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.17716}
}
read the original abstract

By means of cellular dynamical mean-field theory (CDMFT) we study how short-range correlations drive the breakdown of the self-consistent perturbation theory in two-dimensional systems and the most relevant physical consequences associated to it. To this aim, we first derive in a structured and consistent way the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism at the CDMFT level in all physical channels, explicitly addressing the important aspect of the related Ward identities. In this context, we perform systematic calculations of the BSE for the two-dimensional Hubbard model at half-filling at intermediate coupling. Our study illustrates how the divergence of a fundamental building block of the BSE in the charge channel, the two-particle irreducible vertex, systematically occurs at lower interactions than in the (purely local) DMFT case, due to short-range antiferromagnetic fluctuations. Further, the change of sign of the eigenvalues of the generalized charge susceptibility associated to the vertex divergences is identified as the essential prerequisite to drive, at larger interaction values, the physics of the Mott transition in two dimensions, as well as of the adjacent phase-separation instabilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The unit cell of the superlattice with a four-atomic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Examples of lattice modulations encoded in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Representation of the ph-BSE Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Benchmarking. Upper panel: Comparison of the anti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left: Location of the first vertex divergence line in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. a) Interaction scan over the MIT of the double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Left panel: Projections of eigenvalues of the impurity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Analysis of the real-space charge response on the reciprocal superlattice for the full Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Suppression of the uniform charge response at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Analysis of the low temperature magnetic response. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Comparison between the two-particle irreducible [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Phase diagram of the vertex divergences for the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    outgoing|incoming

    Derivation of the particle-particle Bethe-Salpeter equation For the numeric computation of the real-space BSE, a matrix form is necessary. To obtain the particle-particle BSE in this form as given in Sec. II, frequency- and in- dex shifts are necessary, which we discuss here in detail. We define the generalized susceptibility in the particle- particle (pp...

  2. [2]

    the Supplemental of Ref

    Strong coupling expression for the cluster Bethe-Salpeter equation At strong coupling, when the dispersion relationε ij k in the denominator of the Green’s functionG ij k (ν) becomes small in respect to its self-energy Σ ij(ν) (or when iνbe- comes large forν→ ±∞), the BSE can be brought into an approximate form (cf. the Supplemental of Ref. [28] for the c...

  3. [3]

    real-space single boson exchange decomposition To analyze the fluctuations on the impurity level, we employ the single-boson exchange decomposition for the full vertexF[82] and the two-particle irreducible vertex [72], to the real-space cluster quantities for the SU(2)- symmetric case. To that end, we define the bosonic prop- agators as12 wmn ch =U δmn −U...

  4. [4]

    A. Stan, P. Romaniello, S. Rigamonti, L. Reining, and J. A. Berger, Unphysical and physical solutions in many- body theories: from weak to strong correlation, New J. Phys.17, 093045 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Both methods should yield the same result [64]

    Benchmarking of the lattice response to applied field calculations We benchmark the BSE particle-hole calculations set- ting the static anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) correlator χq=0,Q=(π,π) sp (ωm) =T 2 X νn,ν′n χq=0,Q=(π,π) sp (νn, ν′ n, ωm) (C1) into contrast to calculations with the linear response to an applied AFM field for different cluster sizes, namely...

  6. [6]

    B 3) in the three channels Fig

    Benchmarking of the two-particle irreducible vertexΓto the SBE In the following, benchmarking plots of the Bethe- Salpeter equations to the SBE decomposition of Γ (see App. B 3) in the three channels Fig. 11 are presented in the weak couplingU= 1t, βt= 5t, particle-hole asym- metric caset ′ =−0.25t, n= 0.95. Here, all three SBE contributions are significa...

  7. [7]

    Otherwise, the qualitative picture would remain the same, although the response would be slightly underestimated by the BSE

    W ard identities for real-space Ward identities relate lower point correlation functions with higher order correlation functions by an equation of 13 As described in the main text, a tail treatment has been per- formed. Otherwise, the qualitative picture would remain the same, although the response would be slightly underestimated by the BSE. 21 0.0 0.5 1...

  8. [8]

    Sch¨ afer, G

    T. Sch¨ afer, G. Rohringer, O. Gunnarsson, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Divergent Precursors of the Mott-Hubbard Transition at the Two-Particle Level, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 246405 (2013)

    2013

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    Janiˇ s and V

    V. Janiˇ s and V. Pokorn´ y, Critical metal-insulator tran- sition and divergence in a two-particle irreducible vertex in disordered and interacting electron systems, Phys. Rev. B90, 045143 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Kozik, M

    E. Kozik, M. Ferrero, and A. Georges, Nonexistence of the Luttinger-Ward Functional and Misleading Con- vergence of Skeleton Diagrammatic Series for Hubbard- Like Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 156402 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Thunstr¨ om, O

    P. Thunstr¨ om, O. Gunnarsson, S. Ciuchi, and G. Rohringer, Analytical investigation of singularities in two-particle irreducible vertex functions of the Hub- bard atom, Phys. Rev. B98, 235107 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Rossi and F

    R. Rossi and F. Werner, Skeleton series and multival- uedness of the self-energy functional in zero space-time dimensions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 485202 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Rossi, F

    R. Rossi, F. Werner, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Shifted-action expansion and applicability of dressed diagrammatic schemes, Phys. Rev. B93, 161102(R) (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Sch¨ afer, S

    T. Sch¨ afer, S. Ciuchi, M. Wallerberger, P. Thunstr¨ om, O. Gunnarsson, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer, and A. Toschi, Non-perturbative landscape of the Mott- Hubbard transition: Multiple divergence lines around the critical endpoint, Phys. Rev. B94, 235108 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Gunnarsson, G

    O. Gunnarsson, G. Rohringer, T. Sch¨ afer, G. Sangio- vanni, and A. Toschi, Breakdown of Traditional Many- Body Theories for Correlated Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 056402 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Tarantino, B

    W. Tarantino, B. S. Mendoza, P. Romaniello, J. A. Berger, and L. Reining, Many-body perturbation theory and non-perturbative approaches: screened interaction as the key ingredient, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 135602 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Chalupa, P

    P. Chalupa, P. Gunacker, T. Sch¨ afer, K. Held, and A. Toschi, Divergences of the irreducible vertex func- tions in correlated metallic systems: Insights from the Anderson impurity model, Phys. Rev. B97, 245136 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Springer, P

    D. Springer, P. Chalupa, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Interplay between local response and vertex divergences in many-fermion systems with on-site at- traction, Phys. Rev. B101, 155148 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Vuˇ ciˇ cevi´ c, N

    J. Vuˇ ciˇ cevi´ c, N. Wentzell, M. Ferrero, and O. Par- collet, Practical consequences of the Luttinger-Ward functional multivaluedness for cluster DMFT methods, Phys. Rev. B97, 125141 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    A. J. Kim and V. Sacksteder, Multivaluedness of the Luttinger-Ward functional in the fermionic and bosonic system with replicas, Phys. Rev. B101, 115146 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Reitner, L

    M. Reitner, L. Crippa, D. R. Fus, J. C. Bu- dich, A. Toschi, and G. Sangiovanni, Protection of correlation-induced phase instabilities by exceptional susceptibilities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022031 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    H. Eßl, M. Reitner, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Gen- eral Shiba mapping for on-site four-point correlation functions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033061 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    H. Eßl, M. Reitner, E. Kozik, and A. Toschi, How to stay on the physical branch in self-consistent many-electron approaches (2025), arXiv:2502.01420

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gunnarsson, T

    O. Gunnarsson, T. Sch¨ afer, J. P. F. LeBlanc, J. Merino, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer, and A. Toschi, Parquet decomposition calculations of the electronic self-energy, Phys. Rev. B93, 245102 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    smoking gun

    S. Adler, F. Krien, P. Chalupa-Gantner, G. Sangio- vanni, and A. Toschi, Non-perturbative intertwining be- tween spin and charge correlations: A “smoking gun” single-boson-exchange result, SciPost Phys.16, 054 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Melnick and G

    C. Melnick and G. Kotliar, Fermi-liquid theory and di- vergences of the two-particle irreducible vertex in the periodic Anderson lattice, Phys. Rev. B101, 165105 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Reitner, P

    M. Reitner, P. Chalupa, L. Del Re, D. Springer, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Attractive Effect of a Strong Electronic Repulsion: The Physics of Vertex Divergences, Physical Review Letters125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.196403 (2020)

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    Chalupa, T

    P. Chalupa, T. Sch¨ afer, M. Reitner, D. Springer, S. An- dergassen, and A. Toschi, Fingerprints of the Local Mo- ment Formation and its Kondo Screening in the Gen- eralized Susceptibilities of Many-Electron Problems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 056403 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    T. B. Mazitov and A. A. Katanin, Local magnetic mo- ment formation and Kondo screening in the half-filled single-band Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B105, L081111 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    T. B. Mazitov and A. A. Katanin, Effect of local mag- netic moments on spectral properties and resistivity near interaction- and doping-induced Mott transitions, Phys. Rev. B106, 205148 (2022). 26

    2022

  23. [31]

    M. Pelz, S. Adler, M. Reitner, and A. Toschi, Highly nonperturbative nature of the Mott metal-insulator transition: Two-particle vertex divergences in the co- existence region, Phys. Rev. B108, 155101 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    J. Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  25. [33]

    Kowalski, M

    A. Kowalski, M. Reitner, L. Del Re, M. Chatzielefthe- riou, A. Amaricci, A. Toschi, L. de’ Medici, G. Sangio- vanni, and T. Sch¨ afer, Thermodynamic stability at the two-particle level, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 066502 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Reitner, L

    M. Reitner, L. Del Re, M. Capone, and A. Toschi, Non- perturbative feats in the physics of correlated antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033264 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Moghadas, M

    E. Moghadas, M. Reitner, T. Wehling, G. Sangio- vanni, S. Ciuchi, and A. Toschi, Effective enhance- ment of the electron-phonon coupling driven by non- perturbative electronic density fluctuations (2025), arXiv:2503.12113

    2025

  28. [36]

    Badr,Efficiently solving the parquet equations using a sparse representation, Master’s thesis, TU Wien (2024)

    S. Badr,Efficiently solving the parquet equations using a sparse representation, Master’s thesis, TU Wien (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, G. P´ alsson, and G. Biroli, Cellular Dynamical Mean Field Approach to Strongly Correlated Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 186401 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    A. I. Lichtenstein and M. I. Katsnelson, Antiferromag- netism andd-wave superconductivity in cuprates: A cluster dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B62, R9283 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    T. A. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke, and M. Hettler, Quantum Cluster Theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1027 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands

    J. Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands. III. An Improved Solution, Proc R. Soc. London 281, 401 (1964)

    1964

  33. [41]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Effect of Correlation on the Ferro- magnetism of Transition Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 159 (1963)

    1963

  34. [42]

    J. Kanamori, Electron Correlation and Ferromagnetism of Transition Metals, Progress of Theoretical Physics 30, 275 (1963), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/30/3/275/5278869/30-3-275.pdf

    1963

  35. [43]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard Model: A Computational Per- spective, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-090921-033948 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 090921-033948

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13, 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620- 102024 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-031620-102024

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, and G. Kotliar, Finite-temperature magnetism of transition metals: An ab initiodynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067205 (2001)

    2001

  38. [46]

    Meixner, H

    M. Meixner, H. Menke, M. Klett, S. Heinzelmann, S. Andergassen, P. Hansmann, and T. Sch¨ afer, Mott transition and pseudogap of the square-lattice Hubbard model: Results from center-focused cellular dynamical mean-field theory, SciPost Phys.16, 059 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Rohringer, A

    G. Rohringer, A. Katanin, T. Sch¨ afer, A. Hau- soel, K. Held, and A. Toschi, LadderDΓA code, github.com/ladderDGA (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Metzner and D

    W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Correlated Lattice Fermions ind=∞Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 324 (1989)

    1989

  41. [49]

    Georges and G

    A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B45, 6479 (1992)

    1992

  42. [51]

    Ayral, J

    T. Ayral, J. Vuˇ ciˇ cevi´ c, and O. Parcollet, Fierz Conver- gence Criterion: A Controlled Approach to Strongly In- teracting Systems with Small Embedded Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 166401 (2017)

    2017

  43. [52]

    Klett, N

    M. Klett, N. Wentzell, T. Sch¨ afer, F. Simkovic, O. Par- collet, S. Andergassen, and P. Hansmann, Real-space cluster dynamical mean-field theory: Center-focused ex- trapolation on the one- and two particle-levels, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033476 (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    C. B. David S´ en´ echal, Andr´ e-Marie Tremblay,Theoreti- cal Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons(Springer, New York, 2004)

    2004

  45. [54]

    A. N. Rubtsov, V. V. Savkin, and A. I. Lichten- stein, Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions, Phys. Rev. B72, 035122 (2005)

    2005

  46. [55]

    E. Gull, P. Werner, O. Parcollet, and M. Troyer, Continuous-time auxiliary-field Monte Carlo for quan- tum impurity models, EPL (Europhysics Letters)82, 57003 (2008)

    2008

  47. [56]

    Parcollet, M

    O. Parcollet, M. Ferrero, T. Ayral, H. Hafermann, I. Krivenko, L. Messio, and P. Seth, Triqs: A toolbox for research on interacting quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications196, 398 (2015)

    2015

  48. [57]

    Baym, Self-consistent approximations in many-body systems, Phys

    G. Baym, Self-consistent approximations in many-body systems, Phys. Rev.127, 1391 (1962)

    1962

  49. [58]

    M. H. Hettler, M. Mukherjee, M. Jarrell, and H. R. Kr- ishnamurthy, Dynamical cluster approximation: Nonlo- cal dynamics of correlated electron systems, Phys. Rev. B61, 12739 (2000)

    2000

  50. [59]

    Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach to systems of correlated electrons, Eur

    M. Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach to systems of correlated electrons, Eur. Phys. J. B32, 429 (2003)

    2003

  51. [60]

    N. E. Bickers, Theoretical methods for strongly corre- lated electrons (Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Hei- delbert, 2004) Chap. 6, pp. 237–296

    2004

  52. [61]

    Potthoff, Cluster extensions of dynamical mean- field theory, inDMFT:From Infinite Dimensions to Real Materials, Vol

    M. Potthoff, Cluster extensions of dynamical mean- field theory, inDMFT:From Infinite Dimensions to Real Materials, Vol. 8 (Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich, 2018) Chap. 5

    2018

  53. [62]

    Jarrell, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys

    M. Jarrell, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 168 (1992)

    1992

  54. [63]

    Mußhoff, A

    J. Mußhoff, A. Kiani, and E. Pavarini, Magnetic re- sponse trends in cuprates and thet−t ′ hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B103, 075136 (2021)

    2021

  55. [64]

    N. E. Bickers, Self-consistent many-body theory for condensed matter systems, inTheoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons. CRM Series in Mathe- matical Physics, edited by D. S´ en´ echal, A.-M. Tremblay, and C. Bourbonnais (Springer, 2004)

    2004

  56. [65]

    Tagliavini, S

    A. Tagliavini, S. Hummel, N. Wentzell, S. Andergassen, A. Toschi, and G. Rohringer, Efficient bethe-salpeter 27 equations’ treatment in dynamical mean-field theory, arXiv:1803.03036 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Rohringer, A

    G. Rohringer, A. Valli, and A. Toschi, Local electronic correlation at the two-particle level, Phys. Rev. B86, 125114 (2012)

    2012

  58. [67]

    Rohringer,New routes towards a theoretical treat- ment of nonlocal electronic correlations, Ph.D

    G. Rohringer,New routes towards a theoretical treat- ment of nonlocal electronic correlations, Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology (2013)

    2013

  59. [68]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon and H. U. R. Strand, Dual Bethe- Salpeter equation for the multiorbital lattice suscepti- bility within dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155157 (2024)

    2024

  60. [69]

    S´ en´ echal, Cluster Perturbation Theory, inStrongly Correlated Systems: Theoretical Methods, edited by F

    D. S´ en´ echal, Cluster Perturbation Theory, inStrongly Correlated Systems: Theoretical Methods, edited by F. Mancini and A. Avella (Springer series, 2011) Chap. 8

    2011

  61. [70]

    Parcollet, G

    O. Parcollet, G. Biroli, and G. Kotliar, Cluster Dynam- ical Mean Field Analysis of the Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 226402 (2004)

    2004

  62. [71]

    Hafermann, E

    H. Hafermann, E. G. C. P. van Loon, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, and O. Parcollet, Collective charge excitations of strongly correlated electrons, vertex cor- rections, and gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. B90, 235105 (2014)

    2014

  63. [72]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    T. Sch¨ afer, N. Wentzell, F.ˇSimkovic, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang, V. Harkov, F. Le R´ egent, A. Kirsch, Y. Wang, A. J. Kim, E. Kozik, E. A. Stepanov, A. Kauch, S. Andergassen, P. Hans- mann, D. Rohe, Y. M. Vilk, J. P. F. LeBlanc, S. Zhang, A.-M....

    2021

  64. [73]

    Rohringer, A

    G. Rohringer, A. Toschi, H. Hafermann, K. Held, V. I. Anisimov, and A. A. Katanin, One-particle irreducible functional approach: A route to diagrammatic exten- sions of the dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 88, 115112 (2013)

    2013

  65. [74]

    Fratino, P

    L. Fratino, P. S´ emon, M. Charlebois, G. Sordi, and A.- M. S. Tremblay, Signatures of the Mott transition in the antiferromagnetic state of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B95, 235109 (2017)

    2017

  66. [75]

    J. C. Ward, An Identity in Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.78, 182 (1950)

    1950

  67. [76]

    Behn, On the Ward Identities for the Hubbard Model

    U. Behn, On the Ward Identities for the Hubbard Model. Particle-Number Conservation and the Analyti- cal Structure of the Self-Energy, Phys. Stat. Sol. B88, 699 (1978)

    1978

  68. [77]

    Krien, E

    F. Krien, E. G. C. P. van Loon, H. Hafermann, J. Ot- suki, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Conserva- tion in two-particle self-consistent extensions of dynam- ical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B96, 075155 (2017)

    2017

  69. [78]

    N. Ritz, A. Ge, M. Frankenbach, M. Pelz, J. von Delft, and F. B. Kugler, Testing the parquet equations and the U(1) Ward identity for real-frequency correlation functions from the multipoint numerical renormaliza- tion group, Physical Review Research7, 10.1103/3jtq- 5wf5 (2025)

    2025 doi

  70. [79]

    Krien, A

    F. Krien, A. Kauch, and K. Held, Tiling with trian- gles: parquet andGW γmethods unified, Phys. Rev. Research3, 013149 (2021)

    2021

  71. [80]

    Klett,Cellular Dynamical Mean-field Theory in large Impurity Clusters, Ph.D

    M. Klett,Cellular Dynamical Mean-field Theory in large Impurity Clusters, Ph.D. thesis, University of T¨ ubingen (2020)

    2020

  72. [81]

    full” CDMFT vertex. Second, the prominent, “belly shape

    and to DMFT [21] (see App. A). This indicates the progressive onset of screening of the cluster impurity by bath electrons. This picture is coherent with the ob- served behavior of the spectral function: The initial, weakly linearTdependence ofA(ω= 0) changes quan- titatively ...

  73. [82]

    H. Park, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Cluster Dynamical Mean Field Theory of the Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 186403 (2008)

    2008

  74. [83]

    A. J. Kim, F. Simkovic, and E. Kozik, Spin and Charge Correlations across the Metal-to-Insulator Crossover in the Half-Filled 2D Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 117602 (2020)

    2020

  75. [84]

    A. E. Antipov and I. Krivenko, pomerol: 1.1 (2015)

    2015

  76. [85]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1307 (1966)

    1966

  77. [86]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  78. [87]

    V. M. Galitskii and A. B. Migdal, Application of quan- tum fiel theoretical methods to the many-body problem, Sov. Phys. JETP34, 139 (1958)

    1958

  79. [88]

    H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wil- son, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B21, 1003 (1980)

    1980

  80. [89]

    Krien, A

    F. Krien, A. Valli, and M. Capone, Single-boson ex- change decomposition of the vertex function, Phys. Rev. B100, 155149 (2019)

    2019

  81. [90]

    Meixner, M

    M. Meixner, M. Kr¨ amer, N. Wentzell, P. M. Bonetti, S. Andergassen, A. Toschi, and T. Sch¨ afer, Disentan- gling real space fluctuations: the diagnostics of metal- insulator transitions beyond single-particle spectral functions (2025), arXiv:2501.18325v1 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly corre- lated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimen- sions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  83. [92]

    Sordi, K

    G. Sordi, K. Haule, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Mott physics and first-order transition between two metals in the normal-state phase diagram of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B84, 075161 (2011)

    2011

  84. [93]

    H. U. R. Strand, A. Sabashvili, M. Granath, B. Hells- ing, and S. ¨Ostlund, Dynamical mean field theory phase- space extension and critical properties of the finite tem- perature Mott transition, Phys. Rev. B83, 205136 (2011)

    2011

  85. [94]

    Walsh, P

    C. Walsh, P. S´ emon, D. Poulin, G. Sordi, and A.- M. S. Tremblay, Thermodynamic and information- theoretic description of the Mott transition in the two- dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B99, 075122 (2019)

    2019

  86. [95]

    Reymbaut, M

    A. Reymbaut, M. Boulay, L. Fratino, P. S´ emon, W. Wu, G. Sordi, and A. M. S. Tremblay, Mott transition and high-temperature crossovers at half-filling (2020), arXiv:2004.02302 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Reitner,Dychotomy between local and uniform com- pressibility in correlated systems: the role of the irre- ducible vertex, Master thesis, Technischen Universit¨ at Wien (2020)

    M. Reitner,Dychotomy between local and uniform com- pressibility in correlated systems: the role of the irre- ducible vertex, Master thesis, Technischen Universit¨ at Wien (2020)

    2020

  88. [97]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Murthy, and M. J. Rozenberg, Compress- ibility divergence and the finite temperature mott tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 046401 (2002). 28

    2002

  89. [98]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon, F. Krien, and A. A. Katanin, Bethe-salpeter equation at the critical end point of the mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 136402 (2020)

    2020

  90. [99]

    Kotliar, E

    G. Kotliar, E. Lange, and M. J. Rozenberg, Landau the- ory of the finite temperature mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5180 (2000)

    2000

  91. [100]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon, Two-particle correlations and the metal-insulator transition: Iterated perturbation theory revisited, Phys. Rev. B105, 245104 (2022)

    2022

  92. [101]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon, Second-order phase transitions and divergent linear response in dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B109, L241110 (2024)

    2024

  93. [102]

    Sordi, C

    G. Sordi, C. Walsh, P. S´ emon, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Specific heat maximum as a signature of Mott physics in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 121105 (2019)

    2019

  94. [103]

    Harland, S

    M. Harland, S. Brener, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Josephson lattice model for phase fluctu- ations of local pairs in copper oxide superconductors, Phys. Rev. B100, 024510 (2019)

    2019

  95. [104]

    Walsh, M

    C. Walsh, M. Charlebois, P. S´ emon, A.-M. S. Tremblay, and G. Sordi, Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with cellular dynamical mean-field the- ory: A quantum impurity model analysis, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075163 (2023)

    2023

  96. [105]

    H. R. Krishna-murthy, K. G. Wilson, and J. W. Wilkins, Temperature-Dependent Susceptibility of the Symmet- ric Anderson Model: Connection to the Kondo Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1101 (1975)

    1975

  97. [106]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  98. [107]

    Del Re and G

    L. Del Re and G. Rohringer, Fluctuations analysis of spin susceptibility: N´ eel ordering revisited in dynamical mean field theory, Phys. Rev. B104, 235128 (2021)

    2021

  99. [108]

    Krien,Conserving dynamical mean-field approaches to strongly correlated systems, Ph.D

    F. Krien,Conserving dynamical mean-field approaches to strongly correlated systems, Ph.D. thesis, Universit¨ at Hamburg (2018)

    2018

  100. [109]

    Kopietz, L

    P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Sch¨ utz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group, Lecture Notes in Physics 798(Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  101. [110]

    P. M. Bonetti, Local Ward identities for collective exci- tations in fermionic systems with spontaneously broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. B106, 155105 (2022)

    2022

  102. [111]

    C. J. Bolech, S. S. Kancharla, and G. Kotliar, Cellular dynamical mean-field theory for the one-dimensional ex- tended hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B67, 075110 (2003)

    2003

  103. [112]

    H. U. R. Strand, N. Wentzell, and O. Parcollet, tprf - two-particle response function tools based on the TRIQS library (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.