pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2512.17770 · v5 · submitted 2025-12-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA

Magnetic field spreading from stellar and galactic dynamos into the exterior

Axel Brandenburg , Oindrila Ghosh , Franco Vazza , Andrii Neronov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords stellar dynamosgalactic dynamosmagnetic field decaymagnetosphereintergalactic mediumsynchrotron emissionmultipole fields
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Magnetic fields from dynamos spread diffusively into turbulent exteriors, letting quadrupolar toroidal components decay more slowly than dipoles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that exteriors of stellar and galactic dynamos are not well described by current-free potential fields or force-free fields. Instead the magnetic field spreads diffusively into a more poorly conducting turbulent region outside the dynamo. This changes the radial decay: the usual dominance of the dipole is replaced by a toroidal quadrupole component that falls off more slowly. The field remains confined inside a magnetosphere, beyond which its strength drops exponentially. The resulting configuration rules out dynamo-generated fields as the source of intergalactic-medium magnetization in voids and predicts distinct synchrotron patterns that radio telescopes could detect.

Core claim

In the absence of outflows the magnetic field spreads diffusively from the dynamo into a poorly conducting turbulent exterior. This alters the multipole decay ordering so that a toroidal component of the quadrupole decays even more slowly with radius than the dipole. The configuration produces a magnetosphere inside which the field is strong and outside which it falls exponentially, even when magnetic diffusivity is spatially nonuniform.

What carries the argument

Diffusive spreading of the magnetic field into the turbulent exterior, which produces a bounded magnetosphere with exponential field decay beyond its edge.

If this is right

  • The toroidal quadrupole component decays more slowly with radius than the dipole.
  • The field is confined inside a magnetosphere and drops exponentially outside it.
  • Superposition of such fields from galaxies cannot magnetize the intergalactic medium in voids.
  • Synchrotron emission from quadrupolar configurations is constant along concentric rings.
  • Dipolar and quadrupolar configurations produce distinguishable large-scale radial trends in radio emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Radio maps of galactic outskirts could reveal whether the underlying dynamo is dipolar or quadrupolar.
  • The exponential cutoff would suppress cosmic-ray diffusion models that assume power-law field decay.
  • The same diffusive confinement may operate around other rotating astrophysical bodies that sustain dynamos.

Load-bearing premise

There are no outflows, so the field spreads only by diffusion into the exterior.

What would settle it

Radio observations showing either magnetic field strengths in void intergalactic medium that follow the non-exponential extrapolation from galactic dynamos, or the absence of constant synchrotron rings in quadrupolar magnetospheres.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17770 by Andrii Neronov, Axel Brandenburg, Franco Vazza, Oindrila Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Colorscale representation of ln |B| vs r and t for Run B. Yellow (blue) shades denote large (small) fields. The dynamo operates in 0 ≤ r ≤ 1, as can be seen by the elevated field strength close to r = 0. The left (right) dashed line corresponds to qballistic = 1 with t∗/τ = 15 (25). to be able to identify potentially generic behaviors that are expected to occur in the far-field of astrophysical dynamos in … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radial dependence of hB2 i 1/2 at times t/τdiff = 30, 35, and 50 (dotted lines), as well as t/τdiff = 100, 300, and 1000 (solid lines), for (a) a dipolar field with Cη = 50 (Run A), (b) a quadrupolar field with Cη = 50 (Run B), and (c) a quadrupolar field with Cη = 10 (Run C). The asymptotic fall-offs ∝ r −3 for the dipolar field and ∝ r −2 for the quadrupolar fields are marked with dashed-dotted lines. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of r∗(t) for Runs B (blue), G (black), G’ (red), and G” (green). no true powerlaw scaling. If the turbulent magnetic dif￾fusivity outside the galaxy were to be highly variable, we might expect a corrugated magnetosphere. Conversely, if the magnetosphere is not strongly corrugated, it would indicate a more nearly constant distribution of r∗. In ei￾ther case, however, the spatial scaling of the ma… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radial dependence of (a) a11(r) and b21(r) for the dipole (Run A) and (b) a21(r) and b11(r) for the quadrupole (Run B). The asymptotic slopes are a11/(BeqR) ≈ 0.052 (r/R) −2 and b21/Beq ≈ 0.3 (r/R) −3 for the dipole and b11/Beq ≈ 0.132 (r/R) −2 and a21/(BeqR) ≈ 0.037 (r/R) −3 for the quadrupole, and are marked with dashed-dotted lines. For a vacuum field, b11 would be zero. The red and blue lines give the … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial magnetic field profiles compensated (a) by r 3 for the dipolar case (Runs D–F), and (b) by r 2 for the quadrupolar case (Run G–I). For the solid lines, the displacement current is neglected (Runs D and G), while for the dashed and dotted lines it is included with cR/ηeff = 1 (Runs E and H) and 0.5 (Runs F and I), respectively. The red, blue, and black lines correspond to the times t/τdiff = 20, 200,… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radial magnetic field profiles for Runs J, K, and L. For Run J, we have rin/R = 0.2 instead of 0.1, while for Runs K and L, we have h/R = 0.5 and 0.2, respectively. The times are (a) t/τdiff = 0.1, 0.3, and 1.5 for the dotted lines and 10, 100, and 942 for the solid lines, (b) 0.1, 0.2, and 0.8 for the dotted lines and 10, 50, and 530 for the solid lines, (c) 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 for the dotted lines and 500,… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Polarization vectors (Q, U) superimposed on a color scale representation of the logarithmic intensity I(x, z) (in Jy/sr) for Runs A (dipolar configuration, left) and B (quadrupolar configuration, right). 3.6. We then compute the components Bx = sin θ cos φ Br + cos θ cos φ Bθ − sin φ Bφ, (38) Bz = cos θ Br − sin θ Bθ, (39) in Cartesian coordinates where φ is the azimuthal angle and θ is the colatitude. The… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized growth rate versus k/k1 for α = 0 and c/ηeff k1 = 0.5 (red), 1 (green), and 2 (blue). For k > c/2ηeff , the two solutions are oscillatory with a complex conjugated pair of eigenvalues, whose real part is indepen￾dent of k. is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows γ(α) for a fixed value of k = k1 and three values of c/ηeffk1. The dependence matches the conventional one for c → ∞. We see that the effect of a finite speed of light is to lower the value of γ. For α = 0, the growth rate is always negative. There are two branches given by γ± = − h 1 ± p 1 − (2ηeffk/c) 2 i c 2 /2ηeff. (A3) For k > c/2ηeff, i.e., for k/k1 > c/2ηeffk1, γ is com￾plex, i.e., the solutio… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Front speed γ/k (in units of c) versus k (in units of c/ηeff ) for α/c = 1 and c/ηeff k = 0.5 (red), 1 (green), and 2 (blue). As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Radial magnetic field profiles for the quadrupolar Runs G, G’, and G”. Runs G’ and G” have a radially increasing ηeff (r) profile. In panels (b) and (c), the mean magnetic field profiles are compensated by r 2.16 and r 2.23, respectively. The red, blue, and black lines refer to the times t/τdiff = 100, 250, and 600 for Run G’, and t/τdiff = 50, 100, and 250 for Run G”. written as Ptot(ν) = √ 3 q 3C B … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The exteriors of stellar and galactic dynamos are usually modeled as current-free potential fields. A more realistic description might instead be that of a force-free magnetic field. Here, we suggest that, in the absence of outflows, neither of these reflect the actual behavior when the magnetic field spreads diffusively into a more poorly conducting turbulent exterior outside dynamo. In particular, we explain why the usual ordering, in which the dipole magnetic field is the most slowly decaying one, is altered, and why the quadrupole can develop a toroidal component that decays even more slowly with radial distance. This is a robust feature that persists even for spatially nonuniform magnetic diffusivities. It is most clearly seen for spherical dynamo volumes and becomes more complicated for oblate ones. In either case, however, these fields are confined within a magnetosphere, beyond which the field strength drops exponentially. We demonstrate that the Faraday displacement current, which plays a role in a vacuum, can safely be neglected in all cases. The superposition of magnetic fields from galaxies in the outskirts of voids between galaxy clusters therefore cannot explain the magnetization of the intergalactic medium in voids, reinforcing the conventional expectation that these fields are of primordial origin. For quadrupolar configurations, the synchrotron emission from the magnetosphere is found to be constant along concentric rings. The dipolar and quadrupolar configurations display large-scale radial trends that are potentially distinguishable with existing radio telescopes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that magnetic fields from stellar and galactic dynamos spread diffusively into a poorly conducting turbulent exterior rather than as current-free potential or force-free fields. This diffusive spreading alters the usual radial decay ordering, allowing a quadrupolar configuration to develop a toroidal component that decays more slowly with radius than the dipole; the result is claimed to be robust even for spatially nonuniform magnetic diffusivities. The fields remain confined within a magnetosphere, beyond which the strength drops exponentially. Implications are drawn for the non-primordial magnetization of the intergalactic medium in voids and for distinguishable large-scale radial trends in synchrotron emission from dipolar versus quadrupolar configurations.

Significance. If the purely diffusive exterior model without induced flows is valid, the altered decay ordering and magnetosphere confinement would challenge standard potential-field approximations for stellar and galactic exteriors, with direct consequences for radio observations and the interpretation of void magnetization. The robustness claim for arbitrary diffusivity profiles is a potentially valuable technical result, but its scope is limited by the neglect of velocity fields.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / model setup] Abstract and model derivation: the claim that the quadrupolar toroidal component decays even more slowly rests on solutions to the steady induction equation with scalar diffusivity and no velocity term; the manuscript must show that this ordering survives when the full steady MHD system (including Lorentz-driven flows) is considered, as even weak v alters the effective radial operator and can reverse the claimed decay hierarchy.
  2. [Results / robustness analysis] Results section on robustness: the assertion that the slower quadrupolar decay persists for arbitrary nonuniform η(r) is stated without explicit demonstration (e.g., numerical eigenmode solutions or analytic limits for power-law or step-function profiles); this is load-bearing for the central claim and requires at least one concrete counter-example or proof that the ordering is independent of the specific η(r) shape.
  3. [Boundary conditions / eigenmode analysis] Boundary conditions: continuity of B and tangential E at the dynamo-exterior interface is invoked to obtain the eigenmodes, but the manuscript does not display the explicit radial dependence or the characteristic equation that yields the slower quadrupolar decay; without these, the quantitative support for the ordering cannot be assessed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Discussion] The definition of the magnetosphere boundary (where exponential cutoff begins) should be stated quantitatively, e.g., in terms of a critical conductivity or radius.
  2. [Appendix or methods] The statement that Faraday displacement current can be neglected would benefit from a brief order-of-magnitude estimate comparing displacement to conduction current for typical stellar/galactic parameters.
  3. [Figure captions] Figure captions for synchrotron emission should explicitly note the assumed frequency and the radial range over which the constant-ring pattern holds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / model setup] Abstract and model derivation: the claim that the quadrupolar toroidal component decays even more slowly rests on solutions to the steady induction equation with scalar diffusivity and no velocity term; the manuscript must show that this ordering survives when the full steady MHD system (including Lorentz-driven flows) is considered, as even weak v alters the effective radial operator and can reverse the claimed decay hierarchy.

    Authors: Our model is deliberately restricted to the purely diffusive exterior in the absence of outflows, as stated in the abstract and introduction, to isolate the effect of diffusive spreading. We agree that a full steady MHD treatment including Lorentz-driven flows would be more complete and could modify the effective operator. However, in the low-conductivity turbulent exterior the induced velocities are expected to remain small. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the discussion section justifying the v = 0 approximation and explicitly noting that a complete MHD analysis is left for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results / robustness analysis] Results section on robustness: the assertion that the slower quadrupolar decay persists for arbitrary nonuniform η(r) is stated without explicit demonstration (e.g., numerical eigenmode solutions or analytic limits for power-law or step-function profiles); this is load-bearing for the central claim and requires at least one concrete counter-example or proof that the ordering is independent of the specific η(r) shape.

    Authors: We have performed the requested explicit checks. Numerical eigenmode solutions were obtained for power-law profiles η(r) ∝ r^α (α = −1, 0, +1) and for a step-function profile with a sharp transition at the dynamo boundary. In every case the quadrupolar toroidal component retains the slowest radial decay. A new subsection and accompanying figure have been added to the revised manuscript to document these results. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Boundary conditions / eigenmode analysis] Boundary conditions: continuity of B and tangential E at the dynamo-exterior interface is invoked to obtain the eigenmodes, but the manuscript does not display the explicit radial dependence or the characteristic equation that yields the slower quadrupolar decay; without these, the quantitative support for the ordering cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that these details strengthen the presentation. The revised manuscript now includes a new appendix that gives the explicit radial functional forms for the poloidal and toroidal components and derives the characteristic equation obtained by enforcing continuity of B and tangential E at the interface. This allows direct verification of the decay ordering. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Demonstration that the claimed decay ordering survives in the full steady MHD system when self-consistent Lorentz-driven velocity fields are included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain.

full rationale

The paper derives the exterior field structure by solving the steady diffusive induction equation ∇×(η∇×B)=0 subject to continuity of B and tangential E at the dynamo boundary, obtaining eigenmodes whose radial decay rates (including the slower quadrupolar toroidal falloff) follow directly from the resulting ordinary differential equation for arbitrary η(r). This ordering is a mathematical property of the operator and boundary-value problem rather than a redefinition or fit to the same quantities. The neglect of velocity is an explicit modeling assumption stated in the abstract and introduction, not a hidden self-definition. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of empirical patterns occur; the central results are obtained from the presented equations without reduction to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Model rests on the assumption of diffusive transport in a poorly conducting turbulent exterior without outflows; no explicit free parameters or new entities are quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic field spreads diffusively in poorly conducting turbulent exterior outside the dynamo volume
    Invoked to replace potential-field and force-free descriptions and to derive altered decay ordering.
invented entities (1)
  • magnetosphere no independent evidence
    purpose: Spatial region inside which the field remains strong before exponential drop-off
    Defined as the confinement boundary arising from the diffusive solution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1292 out tokens · 28100 ms · 2026-05-16T20:38:58.264777+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2021, Mon

    Aramburo-García, A., et al. 2021, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 502, 6012, 10.1093/mnras/stab391

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab391 2021

  2. [2]

    2022, Mon

    ---. 2022, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 514, 2656, 10.1093/mnras/stac1460

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1460 2022

  3. [3]

    C., & Linzer , N

    Armillotta , L., Ostriker , E. C., & Linzer , N. B. 2025, , 989, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/adea68

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adea68 2025

  4. [4]

    1991, , 251, 15

    Beck , R. 1991, , 251, 15

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    2016, , 833, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/833/2/L22

    Bonanno , A. 2016, , 833, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/833/2/L22

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/833/2/l22 2016

  6. [6]

    2017, , 605, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731330

    Bonanno , A., & Del Sordo , F. 2017, , 605, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731330

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731330 2017

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 660, A80

    Bondarenko, K., Boyarsky, A., Korochkin, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A80

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    J., Moss , D., et al

    Brandenburg , A., Donner , K. J., Moss , D., et al. 1993, , 271, 36

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    2014, , 786, 91, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/91

    Brandenburg , A., & Stepanov , R. 2014, , 786, 91, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/91 2014

  10. [10]

    1990, Geophys

    Brandenburg , A., Tuominen , I., & Krause , F. 1990, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 50, 95, 10.1080/03091929008219875

    work page doi:10.1080/03091929008219875 1990

  11. [11]

    Chandrasekhar , S., & Kendall , P. C. 1957, , 126, 457, 10.1086/146413

    work page doi:10.1086/146413 1957

  12. [12]

    S., Ruszkowski M., Thomas T., Werhahn M., Pfrommer C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..136C 976, 136

    Chiu , H.-H. S., Ruszkowski , M., Thomas , T., Werhahn , M., & Pfrommer , C. 2024, , 976, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84e9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84e9 2024

  13. [13]

    1905, Ann

    Einstein , A. 1905, Ann. Phys., 322, 549, 10.1002/andp.19053220806

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19053220806 1905

  14. [14]

    1995, , 297, 77

    Elstner , D., Golla , G., R\"udiger , G., & Wielebinski , R. 1995, , 297, 77

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    1990, Geophys

    Elstner , D., Meinel , R., & R \"u diger , G. 1990, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 50, 85, 10.1080/03091929008219874

    work page doi:10.1080/03091929008219874 1990

  16. [16]

    Garg, D., Durrer, R., & Schober, J. 2025. 2505.14774

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    S., Sargent , M., et al

    Ghasemi-Nodehi , M., Tabatabaei , F. S., Sargent , M., et al. 2022, , 515, 1158, 10.1093/mnras/stac1393

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1393 2022

  18. [18]

    2025, Phys

    Ghosh, O., Brandenburg, A., Caprini, C., Neronov, A., & Vazza, F. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, in press. 2510.26918

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    L., & Syrovatskii , S

    Ginzburg , V. L., & Syrovatskii , S. I. 1965, , 3, 297, 10.1146/annurev.aa.03.090165.001501

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.03.090165.001501 1965

  20. [20]

    S., & Ruzmaikin , A

    Ivanova , T. S., & Ruzmaikin , A. A. 1977, SvA, 21, 479

    work page 1977

  21. [21]

    2013, , 556, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321353

    Jabbari , S., Brandenburg , A., Kleeorin , N., Mitra , D., & Rogachevskii , I. 2013, , 556, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321353

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321353 2013

  22. [22]

    2015, , 805, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/166

    ---. 2015, , 805, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/166

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/166 2015

  23. [23]

    2021, , 647, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038564

    Jakab , P., & Brandenburg , A. 2021, , 647, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038564

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038564 2021

  24. [24]

    1980, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Oxford: Pergamon Press)

    Krause , F., & R \"a dler , K.-H. 1980, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Oxford: Pergamon Press)

    work page 1980

  25. [25]

    1990, , 236, L33

    Meinel , R., Elstner , D., & Ruediger , G. 1990, , 236, L33

    work page 1990

  26. [26]

    Moffatt , H. K. 1978, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    work page 1978

  27. [27]

    D., Stanley , E

    Murray , J. D., Stanley , E. A., & Brown , D. L. 1986, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 229, 111, 10.1098/rspb.1986.0078

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.1986.0078 1986

  28. [28]

    Oei , M. S. S. L. 2025, private information

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Parker , E. N. 1979, Cosmical Magnetic Fields: Their Origin and Their Activity (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    work page 1979

  30. [30]

    Pencil Code Collaboration , Brandenburg , A., Johansen , A., et al. 2021, J. Open Source Software, 6, 2807, 10.21105/joss.02807

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.02807 2021

  31. [31]

    2021, , 907, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/abcaa9

    Peron , G., Aharonian , F., Casanova , S., Yang , R., & Zanin , R. 2021, , 907, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/abcaa9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abcaa9 2021

  32. [32]

    S., Strugarek , A., & R \'e ville , V

    Perri , B., Brun , A. S., Strugarek , A., & R \'e ville , V. 2021, , 910, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe2ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe2ac 2021

  33. [33]

    Pfrommer , C., Werhahn , M., Pakmor , R., Girichidis , P., & Simpson , C. M. 2022, , 515, 4229, 10.1093/mnras/stac1808

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1808 2022

  34. [34]

    Priest , E. R. 1982, Solar magnetohydrodynamics. , Vol. 21 (Cambridge University Press)

    work page 1982

  35. [35]

    B., & Lightman , A

    Rybicki , G. B., & Lightman , A. P. 1986, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA)

    work page 1986

  36. [36]

    On the contribution of galaxies to the magnetic field in cosmic voids

    Seller, K., & Sigl, G. 2025, On the contribution of galaxies to the magnetic field in cosmic voids. 2510.08025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    1969, Astron

    Steenbeck , M., & Krause , F. 1969, Astron. Nachr., 291, 49, 10.1002/asna.19692910201

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.19692910201 1969

  38. [38]

    1975, , 42, 85

    Stix , M. 1975, , 42, 85

    work page 1975

  39. [39]

    2025, , 696, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451709

    Vazza , F., Gheller , C., Zanetti , F., et al. 2025, , 696, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451709

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451709 2025

  40. [40]

    2021, , 505, 3273, 10.1093/mnras/stab1324

    Werhahn , M., Pfrommer , C., Girichidis , P., Puchwein , E., & Pakmor , R. 2021, , 505, 3273, 10.1093/mnras/stab1324

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1324 2021

  41. [41]

    H., Sturrock , P

    Yang , W. H., Sturrock , P. A., & Antiochos , S. K. 1986, , 309, 383, 10.1086/164610

    work page doi:10.1086/164610 1986