Hausdorff dimension of reflected Bedford--McMullen carpets
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:25 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Reflected Bedford-McMullen carpets obey an explicit McMullen-type Hausdorff dimension formula precisely when their weak projection is separated.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The Hausdorff dimension of a reflected Bedford-McMullen carpet equals the entropy of its weak-coordinate projection. When the weak projection is separated, this entropy admits an explicit McMullen-type formula. The formula is invariant under arbitrary horizontal reflections and under row-compatible weak reflections, and it supplies concrete values for signed row-branch systems, interval-window systems, and finite-block separated systems. Without separation the dimension reduces to a general projection-entropy quantity that lacks an explicit expression.
What carries the argument
The entropy of the weak-coordinate projection, which supplies the dimension value once the projected set meets the separation condition.
If this is right
- The dimension formula remains unchanged under any horizontal reflection of the rectangles.
- Row-compatible weak reflections leave the explicit McMullen-type expression intact.
- Signed row-branch systems, interval-window systems, and finite-block separated systems all admit direct numerical evaluation of the dimension.
- When separation fails, dimension calculation becomes a general projection-entropy problem without a closed form.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The separation criterion may allow the same entropy approach to be applied to other self-affine sets that incorporate reflections.
- Non-separated examples could be handled by developing efficient numerical schemes to estimate projection entropy.
- The stability under horizontal reflections suggests that dimension is insensitive to certain global symmetries of the grid construction.
Load-bearing premise
The weak-coordinate projection must satisfy a separation condition; without it the dimension reverts to an unresolved projection-entropy problem.
What would settle it
For a concrete reflected carpet whose weak projection violates separation, compute its numerical Hausdorff dimension and compare the value against the number given by the McMullen-type formula; any discrepancy falsifies the explicit-formula claim.
Figures
read the original abstract
We study Bedford--McMullen type carpets whose selected grid rectangles may be reflected in one or both coordinates. The organizing principle is that the Hausdorff dimension is controlled by the entropy of the weak-coordinate projection. When this weak projection is separated, we obtain an explicit McMullen-type formula. This yields stability under arbitrary horizontal reflections and row-compatible weak reflections, and it gives several computable mixed-sign classes, including signed row-branch systems, interval-window systems and finite-block separated systems. We also explain why fully arbitrary weak-coordinate reflection patterns lead instead to a projection-entropy problem.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript studies Hausdorff dimensions of Bedford-McMullen carpets in which selected rectangles may be reflected horizontally, vertically, or both. It claims that the dimension is governed by the entropy of the weak-coordinate projection; when this projection satisfies a separation condition, the dimension equals an explicit McMullen-type formula. This is used to establish stability under arbitrary horizontal reflections and row-compatible weak reflections, and to identify several explicitly computable classes (signed row-branch systems, interval-window systems, finite-block separated systems). Fully arbitrary weak reflections reduce to a general projection-entropy problem without an explicit formula.
Significance. If the separation condition is shown to survive the allowed reflections and the entropy-to-dimension equality is rigorously established, the results would extend the classical Bedford-McMullen theory to signed and reflected self-affine sets, supplying new explicit formulas and stability statements in a class of systems that arise in applications with orientation-reversing maps.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract and organizing principle: the claim that separation of the weak-coordinate projection yields an exact McMullen-type formula requires an explicit derivation (including the precise relation between the projection entropy and the Hausdorff dimension) together with error bounds or a proof that equality holds. The abstract states the principle but supplies no derivation or counter-example verification.
- [Section on weak projections and reflections] Stability under row-compatible weak reflections: the assertion that the separation condition persists after reflections needs a concrete argument or example showing that reflected intervals cannot overlap in a way invisible to the weak-projection entropy. Reflections flip signs and can map projected intervals onto each other even when absolute positions are separated; without an overlap-control lemma, the dimension may drop below the claimed formula and the stability statements fail.
minor comments (2)
- [Introduction] Notation for the weak projection and the signed IFS should be introduced with a single consistent definition early in the paper rather than piecemeal.
- [Section 2] The distinction between 'row-compatible' and 'arbitrary' weak reflections would benefit from a short table or diagram illustrating the allowed sign patterns.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions that will appear in the next version of the manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and organizing principle: the claim that separation of the weak-coordinate projection yields an exact McMullen-type formula requires an explicit derivation (including the precise relation between the projection entropy and the Hausdorff dimension) together with error bounds or a proof that equality holds. The abstract states the principle but supplies no derivation or counter-example verification.
Authors: The abstract is a high-level summary. The precise relation between the entropy of the weak-coordinate projection and the Hausdorff dimension, together with the proof that equality holds under the separation condition (including the relevant estimates), is established in Theorem 3.2 and the surrounding arguments in Section 3. We have revised the abstract to include a concise outline of this relation and the main steps of the proof. revision: partial
-
Referee: [Section on weak projections and reflections] Stability under row-compatible weak reflections: the assertion that the separation condition persists after reflections needs a concrete argument or example showing that reflected intervals cannot overlap in a way invisible to the weak-projection entropy. Reflections flip signs and can map projected intervals onto each other even when absolute positions are separated; without an overlap-control lemma, the dimension may drop below the claimed formula and the stability statements fail.
Authors: We agree that an explicit control on overlaps is required. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new Lemma 4.3 that proves row-compatible weak reflections preserve separation of the weak-coordinate projection. The argument tracks the absolute positions of the projected intervals and shows that sign flips cannot produce overlaps invisible to the entropy; this directly supports the stability claims under arbitrary horizontal reflections and row-compatible weak reflections. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: dimension controlled by external projection entropy
full rationale
The paper's organizing principle treats the entropy of the weak-coordinate projection as an independent input quantity. When the separation condition holds, this yields the McMullen-type formula directly from standard entropy-dimension relations for the projected IFS. No equation reduces the claimed dimension to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity; the separation assumption is external and the stability claims under reflections follow from preservation of that entropy control. No self-citation chains or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. The derivation is self-contained against the external benchmark of projection entropy.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Hausdorff dimension of self-affine sets is controlled by projection entropy under separation
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Bárány,On the Ledrappier-Young formula for self-affine measures, Math
B. Bárány,On the Ledrappier-Young formula for self-affine measures, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.159(2015), 405–432
work page 2015
-
[2]
Bedford,Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimension in self-similar sets, Ph.D
T. Bedford,Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimension in self-similar sets, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick, 1984
work page 1984
-
[3]
C.J. Bishop and Y. Peres,Fractals in Probability and Analysis, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2017
work page 2017
-
[4]
J.M.Fraser,The geometry of Bedford-McMullen carpets, in: FractalGeometryandStochastics V, Progress in Probability70, Birkhäuser, 2015, pp. 11–36
work page 2015
-
[5]
McMullen,The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpinski carpets, Nagoya Math
C. McMullen,The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpinski carpets, Nagoya Math. J.96 (1984), 1–9
work page 1984
-
[6]
Peres,The self-affine carpets of McMullen and Bedford have infinite Hausdorff measure, Math
Y. Peres,The self-affine carpets of McMullen and Bedford have infinite Hausdorff measure, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.116(1994), 513–526. 7
work page 1994
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.