Reciprocal Quantum Electrodynamics with Bound States in the Continuum

Shoufeng Lan

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Reciprocal Quantum Electrodynamics with Bound States in the Continuum

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that photon-matter interactions in BIC-based open photonic structures constitute 'reciprocal QED' — the momentum-space counterpart of cavity QED, governed by the same Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian.

desk verdict A readable perspective that coins 'reciprocal QED' for BIC-based light-matter interactions; the label is the paper's only new asset and it is not yet earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.20779 v2 pith:LOFCLROB submitted 2025-12-23 physics.optics

Shoufeng Lan This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics

keywords boundstatesinthecontinuumreciprocalquantumelectrodynamicscavityQEDmomentum-spaceconfinementstrongcouplingweaknonlinearopticsangularphasematching

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that bound states in the continuum (BICs) — nonradiative modes trapped inside the radiation continuum — confine photons in momentum space rather than physical space, making them the reciprocal counterpart of the mirrors used in cavity QED. The author designates this regime 'reciprocal QED' and shows that the standard cavity-QED toolbox, including the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, the Purcell factor, and Rabi splitting, applies directly to BIC photons. Quasi-BICs, formed by breaking structural symmetry, offer a tunable quality factor, giving a practical dial for weak and strong coupling in open, boundaryless structures. Nonlinear processes, especially second-harmonic generation and optical vortex generation, are treated with momentum-space conservation rules. If the framing holds, BIC platforms could provide a fabrication-friendly alternative to mirror cavities for quantum optics experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the photonic bound state in the continuum (BIC): an eigenmode with zero linewidth, and hence infinite lifetime, embedded in the radiation continuum, produced by destructive interference among resonances or by symmetry mismatch. It acts as a 'potential well' in momentum space with no physical boundary. The theoretical engine is the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, which the paper applies without modification to BIC photons, treating them as quantized harmonic modes; the Purcell factor and a non-Hermitian two-level model are then used to analyze weak and strong coupling. For nonlinear processes, the key identity is angular phase matching, j_in = j_out, the conservation of tot

What would settle it

Compute the canonical commutator [Â, Â†] for a quasi-BIC mode that includes its coupling to the radiation continuum; if it is not the identity, Eq. (1) is not the correct Hamiltonian. Alternatively, measure the emission spectrum of an emitter coupled to a quasi-BIC in the strong-coupling regime: if the Rabi splitting does not follow √(4g² − (γm − γph)²) or the Fock-ladder spacing 2g√n, the reciprocal-QED mapping is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cavity QED's real-space confinement by mirrors has a legitimate counterpart: confinement in reciprocal, momentum space by bound states in the continuum, achieved in open structures with no physical boundary. The paper defines reciprocal QED as the photon-matter interactions enabled by this reciprocal confinement, and argues that the same quantized-photon description carries over: BIC photons are described by annihilation and creation operators, and the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian governs weak and strong coupling. In the weak-coupling regime, the Purcell factor modifies spontaneous emission; in the strong-coupling regime, Rabi splitting appears when 2g exceeds the em

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, introduced in Section 3, Eq. (1), is that a BIC photon mode can be quantized as a harmonic oscillator with the same creation and annihilation operators as a cavity photon; if that quantization fails, the Jaynes-Cummings description of reciprocal QED collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

BIC-based planar structures could replace distributed Bragg reflectors and other mirror cavities for weak- and strong-coupling studies, using simpler, fabrication-friendly lithography.
Tunable quasi-BICs provide a continuous knob for coupling strength through the asymmetric parameter δ, since the radiative quality factor scales as δ^-2.
The momentum-space viewpoint makes linear and angular momentum explicit control variables, enabling effects such as directional lasing and vortex generation that are awkward in conventional cavities.
Angular phase matching (j_in = j_out) supplies a design rule for efficient harmonic generation and high-harmonic vortex generation in BIC platforms.
Reciprocal QED could extend cavity QED's single-quantum control to open photonic platforms compatible with 2D materials, nanowires, and quantum dots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

As an editorial inference, the framework stands or falls on whether a quasi-BIC mode satisfies canonical commutation relations once coupling to the continuum is included; a rigorous open-system quantization would be the decisive next step.
As an editorial inference, if the Jaynes-Cummings ladder applies, a testable extension is photon blockade or antibunching from a single emitter coupled to a quasi-BIC — a signature the review itself does not predict.
As an editorial inference, the momentum-space confinement idea should generalize beyond photons to any wave system with bound states in the continuum, such as acoustic, mechanical, or electronic systems, producing 'reciprocal' analogues of confined QED.
As an editorial inference, the label 'reciprocal QED' could also be applied to any platform achieving strong coupling through momentum-space localization, not only photonic crystals, so the review's vocabulary may outlive its specific examples.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This is a perspective/review, not a research paper. The only new thing is the term 'reciprocal QED,' and the paper does not yet justify it. That is the first thing to know. The second is that the author seems aware of the gap—Section 5 explicitly says a systematic momentum-language description does not yet exist. The paper is honest about its own limits, which counts in its favor.

What the paper does well is organize the BIC literature around a simple analogy: cavities confine light in real space, BICs confine light in momentum space, so the usual cavity-QED toolbox (Purcell factor, Jaynes-Cummings model, Rabi splitting) should carry over. The survey of BIC types (symmetry-protected, accidental, Friedrich-Wintgen) and the discussion of quasi-BICs with Q ∝ δ^-2 is accurate. The nonlinear-section material on vortex generation and angular phase matching is a useful summary, especially the idea that angular momentum conservation plays the role that phase matching plays in ordinary nonlinear optics. Equations 1-5 are textbook and are used correctly.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader put it: the JC Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is assumed to apply to BIC photons, with canonical operators and a constant coupling g, but no quantization of the BIC mode is provided. A BIC is a non-normalizable state embedded in a continuum; it is not a closed cavity mode. The paper's non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (Eq. 4) adds decay rates by hand, which is not the same as deriving the reduced description from an open-system QED treatment. The 'momentum potential well' is a nice metaphor, but it is not developed into a tool. So the central claim — that we can designate these interactions as 'reciprocal QED' — is a promissory note. That is a serious weakness for a paper whose main contribution is the name.

Still, I would not dismiss the paper. The review is clear, the citations are appropriate, and the author is candid about what is missing. It could be a useful perspective piece for the BIC community, and the term might catch on if someone later fills in the quantization step. As a research paper, it has no new result; as a perspective, it has a thesis that deserves a referee's eyes. I would send it to peer review with one central question for the referee: is the 'reciprocal QED' framing justified, or is it merely a new label on known phenomena? If the author can add a concrete quantization of a quasi-BIC and show the reduction to a single-mode JC model, the paper earns its title. If not, the title and abstract need to be softened to avoid overclaiming.

For my own work, I would not cite it as a technical reference, but I might discuss it as a framing proposal. Bring it to a reading group if you want a debate about naming and substance.

Best.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This perspective/review article proposes the term 'reciprocal QED' for light-matter interactions mediated by photonic bound states in the continuum (BICs), where the photon is confined in momentum space rather than in a physical cavity. It reviews the physical mechanisms of symmetry-protected, accidental, and Friedrich-Wintgen BICs; discusses weak and strong coupling using the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian with phenomenological loss rates; and surveys nonlinear optical processes, including harmonic generation and vortex generation with angular phase matching. The paper argues that BIC platforms provide a fabrication-friendly alternative to mirror cavities and that the momentum-space viewpoint can organize existing results.

Significance. If the proposed nomenclature and framing are accepted, the paper could usefully bridge the cavity-QED and BIC communities and organize a growing body of experimental and theoretical work. The review is well structured, covers a broad range of recent literature, and clearly articulates a conceptual vision. Its main contribution is conceptual rather than technical: it does not present new derivations or experimental data. The strengths are the clarity of the exposition and the explicit identification of open questions. However, as detailed below, the central label 'reciprocal QED' is currently supported more by analogy than by a demonstrated quantization of BIC modes.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (1)] The Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian is presented as the starting point for BIC-enabled reciprocal QED, but the paper does not justify that a BIC mode, being an eigenstate embedded in a radiative continuum, can be quantized as a harmonic mode with canonical operators Â and Â† and a constant coupling g. In a truly open structure, the mode expansion includes the continuum, and the single-mode approximation is valid only in the high-Q quasi-BIC limit. The manuscript should state this condition explicitly and cite relevant works on quantization of open or quasi-normal modes. Without this, the 'reciprocal QED' label remains a metaphor rather than a QED framework.
[Section 5, first paragraph] The Discussion openly admits that 'creating a systematic description of photon-matter interactions in a momentum language' is still missing. This is a direct concession that the central claim—that BIC-based photon-matter interactions constitute a QED framework—is not yet established. The abstract and title should be tempered to propose 'reciprocal QED' as a research program, or the paper should include a concrete outline of how the missing systematic description would be constructed. As written, the claim overstates the present status of the field.
[Section 4, nonlinear QED states] The treatment of nonlinear processes uses photon Fock states |N(k,η)⟩ for BIC modes without specifying how these modes are quantized in an open structure. Since the cited nonlinear phenomena are computed or measured classically, the connection to the QED formalism is not demonstrated. Please clarify whether the Fock-state description is a formal representation, an approximation, or purely heuristic, and provide at least one example where such a state has been used in a BIC context.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] There are several typos and grammatical issues: 'Plank' should be 'Planck' (Section 3), 'mentum' should be 'momentum' (Section 4), 'frar fields' should be 'far fields' (Fig. 3 caption), 'structrural' should be 'structural' (Fig. 3 caption), and 'semiclassical theorem' is likely intended as 'semiclassical theory' (Section 4).
[Reference [77]] The reference is malformed: 'arXiv preprint, pp. arXiv:.04694' is missing the archive identifier. It should be a complete arXiv number such as arXiv:2203.04694 or similar.
[Figure 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'frar fields' should be 'far fields'. Also, the phrase 'quantum dark mode' is used without a definition; it may be helpful to define it in the text.
[Section 2, reciprocal potential well] The concept of a 'reciprocal potential well' is introduced as a phenomenological analogy, but it is not defined mathematically. A brief formal definition (e.g., in terms of the effective Hamiltonian or the band structure) would increase precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: 'reciprocal QED' is an explicit nomenclature proposal, not a derived prediction; the JC Hamiltonian is assumed as standard and the paper concedes the systematic description is still missing.

full rationale

The paper claims no quantitative prediction from fitted parameters; it proposes a name ('reciprocal QED') for BIC-mediated photon-matter interaction with confinement in momentum space. The designation is introduced as a designation: 'We can designate such photon-matter interactions enabled by reciprocal light confinement through BICs with truly open systems as reciprocal QED.' There is no derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs. The only load-bearing physics is the standard Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, Eq. (1), which is imported from the established literature [49,50] rather than derived from BIC properties; the paper assumes BIC photons can be described by the annihilation operator A-hat. This is an assumption that could be invalid for open systems, and the skeptic's objection is a validity/correctness concern, not circularity: the paper nowhere claims to have proved the JC form from BIC physics. Indeed, Section 5 explicitly disclaims the derivation: 'creating a systematic description of photon-matter interactions in a momentum language' is stated as the challenge, not as an accomplished result. The author's self-citations (Ref [44] for quasi-BIC Q proportional to delta^-2 and Ref [75] for vortex high-harmonic generation) are used as illustrative examples of prior results and are not load-bearing for the naming claim. The remaining issue is that the paper renames a known body of BIC phenomena under a new label, but this is a perspective/nomenclature contribution, honestly presented, not a disguised derivation. Score 2 acknowledges the self-definitional flavor and the self-citations without treating them as load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim is a perspective/nomenclature proposal, so it rests on standard QED and BIC physics from the cited literature. The main unsupported step is the implicit quantization of BIC modes as cavity-like modes, and the main invented entity is the term 'reciprocal QED' itself, which carries no independent evidence.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Photonic bound states in the continuum exist and are reproducible physical modes.
Section 2 and Refs [25-27]; the review's call for reciprocal QED presupposes the BIC phenomenon.
domain assumption Photons confined by BICs can be described by standard cavity-QED quantized operators (Â, Â†) and the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian.
Section 3, Eq. (1); the paper applies the JC model to BIC photons without deriving the quantization of BIC modes.
ad hoc to paper BIC confinement can be modeled as a 'reciprocal potential well' in momentum space.
Section 2: 'we can treat this collapsing behavior as a reciprocal potential well for photon confinement.' This is a heuristic metaphor, not a derived result.
domain assumption The Purcell factor formula and angular phase-matching conservation j_in = j_out apply to BICs.
Eq. (2) and Section 4; standard results from prior literature assumed valid for BICs without re-derivation.

invented entities (1)

reciprocal QED
purpose: A new name/label for photon-matter interactions enabled by momentum-space confinement via BICs.
Introduced in the abstract and Section 1 as a designation. No new physical content, no falsifiable prediction, and no formalism is attached beyond reusing standard cavity-QED equations.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reciprocal Quantum Electrodynamics with Bound States in the Continuum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LOFCLROB

@misc{pith2026251220779,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reciprocal Quantum Electrodynamics with Bound States in the Continuum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LOFCLROB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.20779}
}

read the original abstract

Quantum electrodynamics (QED) accurately describes all known forms of modern optics and photonics regarding interactions between photons and matter. While matter ranges widely from atoms, particles, to solids, photons are predominantly in a confined physical space, such as a pair of mirrors, for enhanced photon-matter interactions known as cavity QED. Since position and momentum are canonically conjugate variables governed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, a fundamental question arises - what if light confinement is in the not-so-intuitive momentum or reciprocal space? The realization of photonic bound states in the continuum (BICs) has made this exotic scenario possible. Here, we summarize the most recent advancements at this research frontier in optics and photonics, covering weak coupling, strong coupling, and nonlinear optics. We can designate such photon-matter interactions enabled by reciprocal light confinement through BICs with truly open systems as reciprocal QED, which holds great promise to comprehend and extend cavity QED for optics, photonics, and related fields.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references

[1]

The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,

P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 114, no. 767, pp. 243-265, 1927

1927
[2]

Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,

W. E. Lamb, and R. C. Retherford, “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,” Physical Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 241-243, 1947

1947
[3]

On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields,

S. Tomonaga, “On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27-42, 1946

1946
[4]

Quantum electrodynamics .1. A covariant formulation,

J. Schwinger, “Quantum electrodynamics .1. A covariant formulation,” Physical Review, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1439-1461, 1948

1948
[5]

Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics,

R. P. Feynman, “Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 769-789, 1949

1949
[6]

The radiation theories of tomonaga, schwinger, and feynman,

F. J. Dyson, “The radiation theories of tomonaga, schwinger, and feynman,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 486-502, 1949

1949
[7]

Quantum rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali et al., “Quantum rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1800 -1803, 1996

1996
[8]

Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,

D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1796-1799, 1996

1996

Show all 78 references

[9]

Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary,

S. Haroche, “Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 1083-1102, 2013

2013
[10]

Colloquium: Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity,

J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, “Colloquium: Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 565-582, 2001

2001
[11]

Cavity quantum electrodynamics: Coherence in context,

H. Mabuchi, and A. C. Doherty, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics: Coherence in context,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5597, pp. 1372-1377, 2002

2002
[12]

Trapped atoms in cavity qed: Coupling quantized light and matter,

R. Miller, T. E. Northup, K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, and H. J. Kimble, “Trapped atoms in cavity qed: Coupling quantized light and matter,” Journal of Physics B- Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. S551-S565, 2005

2005
[13]

Cavity quantum electrodynamics,

H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B. G. Englert, and T. Becker, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1325-1382, 2006

2006
[14]

Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures,

M. Pelton, “Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures,” Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 427-435, 2015

2015
[15]

Cavity qed with quantum gase s: New paradigms in many-body physics,

F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, “Cavity qed with quantum gase s: New paradigms in many-body physics,” Advances in Physics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1-153, 2021

2021
[16]

Strong coupling, energy splitting, and level crossings: A classical perspective,

L. Novotny, “Strong coupling, energy splitting, and level crossings: A classical perspective,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1199-1202, 2 010
[17]

Physics and device applications of optical microcavities,

H. Yokoyama, “Physics and device applications of optical microcavities,” Science, vol. 256, no. 5053, pp. 66-70, 1992

1992
[18]

Optical microcavities,

K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6950, pp. 839-846, 2003

2003
[19]

Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: A review of principles and applications,

R. Halir, P. J. Bock, P. Cheben et al., “Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: A review of principles and applications,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25-49, 2015

2015
[20]

Light-matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles,

N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, “Light-matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 538-561, 2020. 18

2020
[21]

Photonic band -gap structures,

E. Yablonovitch, “Photonic band -gap structures,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B-Optical Physics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 283-295, 1993

1993
[22]

Visible light from localized surface charges moving across a grating,

S. J. Smith, and E. M. Purcell, “Visible light from localized surface charges moving across a grating,” Physical Review, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1069-1069, 1953

1953
[23]

On some peculiar discrete eigenvalues,

J. Von Neumann, and E. Wigner, “On some peculiar discrete eigenvalues,” Phys. Z., vol. 30, pp. 465-467, 1929

1929
[24]

Interfering resonances and bound-states in the continuum,

H. Friedrich, and D. Wintgen, “Interfering resonances and bound-states in the continuum,” Physical Review A, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 3231-3242, 1985

1985
[25]

Bound states in the continuum in photonics,

D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov, “Bound states in the continuum in photonics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 18, pp. 183902, 2008

2008
[26]

Experimental observation of optical bound states in the continuum,

Y. Plotnik, O. Peleg, F. Dreisow et al., “Experimental observation of optical bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 18, pp. 183901, 2011

2011
[27]

Observation of trapped l ight within the radiation continuum,

C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, J. Lee et al. , “Observation of trapped l ight within the radiation continuum,” Nature, vol. 499, no. 7457, pp. 188-191, 2013

2013
[28]

Bound states in the continuum,

C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, “Bound states in the continuum,” Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 16048, 2016

2016
[29]

Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum,

A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, and B. Kante, “Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum,” Nature, vol. 541, no. 7636, pp. 196-199, 2017

2017
[30]

Giant nonlinear resp onse at the nanoscale driven by bound states in the continuum,

L. Carletti, K. Koshelev, C. De Angelis, and Y. Kivshar, “Giant nonlinear resp onse at the nanoscale driven by bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 033903, 2018

2018
[31]

Dimerized high contrast gratings,

A. C. Overvig, S. Shrestha, and N. F. Yu, “Dimerized high contrast gratings,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1157-1168, 2018

2018
[32]

Bound states in the continuum through environmental design,

A. Cerjan, C. W. Hsu, and M. C. Rechtsman, “Bound states in the continuum through environmental design,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 023902, 2019

2019
[33]

Subwavelength dielectric reso nators for nonlinear nanophotonics,

K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik -Gaykazyan et al. , “Subwavelength dielectric reso nators for nonlinear nanophotonics,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6475, pp. 288-292, 2020

2020
[34]

Photonic bound states in the continuum: From basics to applications,

S. I. Azzam, and A. V. Kildishev, “Photonic bound states in the continuum: From basics to applications,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2001469, 2021

2021
[35]

Bound states in the continuum in resonant nanostructures: An overview of engineered materials for tailored applications,

S. Joseph, S. Pandey, S. Sarkar, and J. Joseph, “Bound states in the continuum in resonant nanostructures: An overview of engineered materials for tailored applications,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 4175-4207, 2021

2021
[36]

Low-threshold bound state in the continuum lasers in hybrid lattice resonance metasurfaces,

J. H. Yang, Z. T. Hua ng, D. N. Maksimov et al. , “Low-threshold bound state in the continuum lasers in hybrid lattice resonance metasurfaces,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2100118, 2021

2021
[37]

Hybrid 2d-material photonics with bound states in the continuum,

Z. J. Yu, Y. Wang, B. L. Sun et al., “Hybrid 2d-material photonics with bound states in the continuum,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 1901306, 2019

2019
[38]

Nonlinear polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to optical bound states in the continuum,

V. Kravtsov, E. Khestanova, F. A. Benimetskiy et al., “Nonlinear polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to optical bound states in the continuum,” Light-Science & Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56, 2020

2020
[39]

Quasi-bic resonant enhancement of second-harmonic generation in ws2 monolayers,

N. Bernhardt, K. Koshelev, S. J. U. White et al. , “Quasi-bic resonant enhancement of second-harmonic generation in ws2 monolayers,” Nano Letters, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 5309 - 5314, 2020

2020
[40]

Enhanced strong coupling of tmdc monolayers by bound state in the continu um,

I. A. M. Al -Ani, K. As'Ham, L. J. Huang, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and H. T. Hattori, “Enhanced strong coupling of tmdc monolayers by bound state in the continu um,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2100240, 2021. 19

2021
[41]

Steering nonlinear twisted valley photons of monolayer ws2 by vector beams,

H. W. Yang, J. T. Pan, S. Zhang et al. , “Steering nonlinear twisted valley photons of monolayer ws2 by vector beams,” Nano Letters, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 7261-7269, 2021

2021
[42]

S. Cao, H. G. Dong, J. L. He, E. Forsberg, Y. Jin, and S. L. He, “Normal-incidence-exc ited strong coupling between excitons and symmetry -protected quasi -bound states in the continuum in silicon nitride -ws2 heterostructures at room temperature,” Journal of Physical Chemistr...

2020
[43]

Coherent momentum control of forbidden excitons,

X. Ma, K. Kudtarkar, Y. Chen et al., “Coherent momentum control of forbidden excitons,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6916, 2022

2022
[44]

Dark plasmonic modes in diatomic gratings for plasmoelectronics,

S. Lan, S. P. Rodrigues, M. Taghinejad, and W. Cai, “Dark plasmonic modes in diatomic gratings for plasmoelectronics,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1600312, 2017

2017
[45]

High-q supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators,

M. V. Rybin, K. L. Koshelev, Z. F. Sadrieva et al. , “High-q supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 119, no. 24, 2017

2017
[46]

Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum,

W. H. Wang, Y. K. Srivastava, T. C. Tan, Z. M. Wang, and R. Singh, “Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2811, 2023

2023
[47]

Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum,

A. C. Overvig, S. C. Malek, M. J. Carter, S. Shrestha, and N. F. Yu, “Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum,” Physical Review B, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 035434, 2020

2020
[48]

M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum optics , Cambridge: Cambridge Universi ty Press, 1997

1997
[49]

Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to beam maser,

E. T. Jaynes, and F. W. Cummings, “Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to beam maser,” Proceedings of the Ieee, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 89- 109, 1963

1963
[50]

Novel nanostructures and materials for strong light matter interactions,

D. G. Baranov, M. Wersall, J. Cuadra, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. Shegai, “Novel nanostructures and materials for strong light matter interactions,” Acs Photonics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24-42, 2018

2018
[51]

Engineering photonic environments for two - dimensional materials,

X. Ma, N. Youngblood, X. Liu et al. , “Engineering photonic environments for two - dimensional materials,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1031-1058, 2021

2021
[52]

Signatures of the ultrastrong light- matter coupling regime,

A. A. Anappara, S. De Liberato, A. Tredicucci et al., “Signatures of the ultrastrong light- matter coupling regime,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 20, 2009

2009
[53]

Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,

P. Forn-Diaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, “Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 91, no. 2, 2019

2019
[54]

Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,

A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Sav asta, and F. Nori, “Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19-40, 2019

2019
[55]

Quantum electrodynamical metamaterials,

J. J. Yu, J. Sloan, N. Rivera, and M. Soljačić, “Quantum electrodynamical metamaterials,” Physical Review A, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 033509, 2023

2023
[56]

Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Physical Review, vol. 69, no. 11-1, pp. 681-681, 1946

1946
[57]

Theory of the spontaneous optical emission of nanosize photonic and plasmon resonators,

C. Sauvan, J. P. Hugonin, I. S. Maksymov, and P. Lalanne, “Theory of the spontaneous optical emission of nanosize photonic and plasmon resonators,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 23, pp. 237401, 2013

2013
[58]

Strongly enhanced light–matter coupling of monolayer ws2 from a bound state in the continuum,

E. Maggiolini, L. Polimeno, F. Todisco et al., “Strongly enhanced light–matter coupling of monolayer ws2 from a bound state in the continuum,” Nature Materials, vol. 22, pp. 964-969, 2023. 20

2023
[59]

Quantum electrodynamics in modern optics and photonics: Tutorial,

D. L. Andrews, D. S. Bradshaw, K. A. Forbes, and A. Salam, “Quantum electrodynamics in modern optics and photonics: Tutorial,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B - Optical Physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1153-1172, 2020

2020
[60]

Efficient second-harmonic generation from silicon slotted nanocubes with bound states in the continuum,

C. Z. Fang, Q. Y. Yang, Q. C. Yuan et al., “Efficient second-harmonic generation from silicon slotted nanocubes with bound states in the continuum,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2022

2022
[61]

Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,

T. Santiago-Cruz, S. D. Gennaro, O. Mitrofa nov et al. , “Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,” Science, vol. 377, no. 6609, pp. 991-+, 2022

2022
[62]

Realizing symmetry -guaranteed pairs of bound states in the continuum in metasurfaces,

C. F. Doiron, I. Brener, and A. Cerjan, “Realizing symmetry -guaranteed pairs of bound states in the continuum in metasurfaces,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, 2022

2022
[63]

Doubly resonant second-harmonic generation of a vortex beam from a bound state in the continuum,

J. Wang, M. Clementi, M. Minkov et al., “Doubly resonant second-harmonic generation of a vortex beam from a bound state in the continuum,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1126 - 1132, 2020

2020
[64]

Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum,

B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljacic, “Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 25, pp. 257401, 2014

2014
[65]

Recent advances in 2d, 3d and higher -order topological photonics,

M. Kim, Z. Jacob, and J. Rho, “Recent advances in 2d, 3d and higher -order topological photonics,” Light-Science & Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020

2020
[66]

Topological photonics,

T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo et al. , “Topological photonics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 91, no. 1, 2019

2019
[67]

Active topological photonics,

Y. Ota, K. Takata, T. Ozawa et al., “Active topological photonics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 547-567, 2020

2020
[68]

Nonlinear topological photonics,

D. Smirnova, D. Leykam, Y. D. Chong, and Y. Kivshar, “Nonlinear topological photonics,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020

2020
[69]

Generating optical vortex beams by momentum- space polarization vortices centred at bound states in the continuum,

B. Wang, W. Z. Liu, M. X. Zhao et al., “Generating optical vortex beams by momentum- space polarization vortices centred at bound states in the continuum,” Nature Photonics, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 623-628, 2020

2020
[70]

Observation of polarization vortices in momentum space,

Y. W. Zhang, A. Chen, W. Z. Liu et al., “Observation of polarization vortices in momentum space,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 18, pp. 186103, 2018

2018
[71]

Topological control of 2d perovskite emission in the strong coupling regime,

S. Kim, B. H. Woo, S. C. An et al., “Topological control of 2d perovskite emission in the strong coupling regime,” Nano Letters, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 10076-10085, 2021

2021
[72]

Polariton bose-einstein condensate from a bound state in the continuum,

V. Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, S. Zanotti et al., “Polariton bose-einstein condensate from a bound state in the continuum,” Nature, vol. 605, no. 7910, pp. 447-452, 2022

2022
[73]

Realization of polaritonic topological charge at room temperat ure using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskite metasurface,

N. H. Dang, S. Zanotti, E. Drouard et al., “Realization of polaritonic topological charge at room temperat ure using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskite metasurface,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 10, no. 6, 2022

2022
[74]

Doubly resonant chi((2)) nonlinear photonic crystal cavity based on a bound state in the continuum,

M. Minkov, D. Gerace, and S. H. Fan, “Doubly resonant chi((2)) nonlinear photonic crystal cavity based on a bound state in the continuum,” Optica, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1039-1045, 2019

2019
[75]

High-harmonic optical vortex generation from photonic bound states in the continuum,

L. Kang, Y. H. Wu, X. Z. Ma, S. F. Lan, and D. H. Werner, “High-harmonic optical vortex generation from photonic bound states in the continuum,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2101497, 2022

2022
[76]

Continuous control of the nonlinearity phase for harmonic generations,

G. X. Li, S. M. Chen, N. Pholchai et al., “Continuous control of the nonlinearity phase for harmonic generations,” Nature Materials, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 607-612, 2015

2015
[77]

Imaging with an ultra-thin reciprocal lens,

W. Liu, J. Chen, T. Li et al., “Imaging with an ultra-thin reciprocal lens,” arXiv preprint, pp. arXiv:.04694, 2022. 21

2022
[78]

Floquet vortex states induced by light carrying an orbital angular momentum,

H. Kim, H. Dehghani, I. Ahmadabadi, I. Martin, and M. Hafezi, “Floquet vortex states induced by light carrying an orbital angular momentum,” Physical Review B, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. L081301, 2022

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,

P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 114, no. 767, pp. 243-265, 1927

1927

[2] [2]

Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,

W. E. Lamb, and R. C. Retherford, “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,” Physical Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 241-243, 1947

1947

[3] [3]

On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields,

S. Tomonaga, “On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27-42, 1946

1946

[4] [4]

Quantum electrodynamics .1. A covariant formulation,

J. Schwinger, “Quantum electrodynamics .1. A covariant formulation,” Physical Review, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1439-1461, 1948

1948

[5] [5]

Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics,

R. P. Feynman, “Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 769-789, 1949

1949

[6] [6]

The radiation theories of tomonaga, schwinger, and feynman,

F. J. Dyson, “The radiation theories of tomonaga, schwinger, and feynman,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 486-502, 1949

1949

[7] [7]

Quantum rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali et al., “Quantum rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1800 -1803, 1996

1996

[8] [8]

Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,

D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1796-1799, 1996

1996