Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Effect of Population Imbalance on Vortex Mass in Superfluid Fermi Gases

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Population imbalance and temperature combine to sharply tune the vortex mass in superfluid Fermi gases, with a predicted more-than-doubling near 20% of Tc on the BEC side.

desk verdict Useful EFT extension with a sharp finite-T phase-boundary oversight that likely makes part of Fig. 4 unphysical. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.22099 v2 pith:3VXWELOL submitted 2025-12-26 cond-mat.quant-gas

Lucas Levrouw , Hiromitsu Takeuchi , Jacques Tempere This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords vortexmasssuperfluidFermigasespopulationimbalanceBEC-BCScrossovereffectivefieldtheoryquantizedvorticesspincore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends a previous effective-field-theory calculation of vortex mass to superfluid Fermi gases with unequal spin populations. It argues that population imbalance alone changes the vortex mass only slightly at zero temperature, but in combination with thermal fluctuations it becomes a strong effect: the vortex mass can more than double near 20% of the superfluid critical temperature on the BEC side, and can be sharply suppressed as the critical temperature is approached. The reason is that imbalance modifies the vortex core structure—widening the superfluid core and filling it with excess normal particles—and this modification is amplified by thermal quasiparticles. If true, this gives experimentalists a concrete parameter regime in which the long-sought vortex mass could be observed.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the effective field theory for superfluid Fermi gases, with complex BCS order parameter Φ as the dynamical variable and coefficients computed from the fermionic path integral via gradient expansion. The vortex mass is split into M_a = 2π∫ r (ρ_s,∞ − ρ_s) dr and M_i = 2π∫ r (ρ_n − ρ_n,∞) dr, which measure the expelled superfluid and the core's excess normal density; both scale logarithmically with system size, with core corrections α_a and α_i. Population imbalance enters through the chemical potential ζ, which acts as an effective Zeeman field; the imbalance density accumulates in the core, widening the superfluid core and adding to M_i. The radial order-parameter profil

What would settle it

Recompute the finite-temperature superfluid transition temperature for each imbalance and truncate the vortex-mass curves at the true T_c(ζ); if the high-temperature branch where mass decreases with imbalance lies entirely in the normal phase, that decrease is an artifact. Alternatively, measure vortex trajectories in an imbalanced BEC-side Fermi gas near T/T_c≈0.2 and see whether the inferred vortex mass exceeds the balanced value by about a factor of two.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the vortex mass in a superfluid Fermi gas is a sensitive function of spin polarization plus temperature. Using an effective field theory for the BCS order parameter, the authors derive radial profiles of the superfluid and normal densities around a single vortex and compute the two pieces of the vortex mass: an associated mass from the superfluid expelled from the core, and an internal mass from the excess normal (imbalanced) particles accumulated there. They find that near the critical imbalance, on the BEC side of the BEC-BCS crossover, the total vortex mass rises to more than twice its balanced, zero-temperature value at T/T_c≈0.2, before dropping as T approaches

Load-bearing premise

The calculation labels finite-temperature results by the zero-temperature critical imbalance ζ_c without specifying the finite-temperature superfluid phase boundary, so for near-critical imbalance some plotted high-temperature points may lie in the normal phase where a vortex mass is not defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, imbalanced box-trapped Fermi gases at low temperature on the BEC side provide a concrete window where vortex inertia becomes observable.
  • Imbalance acts as a new tuning knob, alongside scattering length and temperature, for controlling vortex dynamics.
  • The non-monotonic temperature dependence means experiments must control temperature tightly; near criticality the mass drops, away from it rises.
  • At zero temperature, imbalance changes the vortex mass only locally, so a clear signal requires working at finite temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the finite-temperature plots label imbalance by the zero-temperature critical value ζ_c; if the true superfluid transition temperature for ζ/ζ_c=0.9 lies below T/T_c=1, some high-temperature points are in the normal phase and the predicted decrease with imbalance may be an artifact.
  • Editorial inference: the same machinery could be applied to two-component Bose-Einstein condensates with species imbalance, where core filling by the minority component should produce a similar mass enhancement, offering a testable cross-platform prediction.
  • Editorial inference: a direct experimental probe could be the vortex precession or mutual-friction frequency in a box-trapped Fermi gas: if the mass doubles near T/T_c≈0.2, the vortex trajectory should slow by roughly a factor of two compared with the balanced gas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the effective field theory (EFT) approach of Levrouw, Takeuchi, and Tempere (Ref. [36]) for vortex mass in superfluid Fermi gases to the case of population imbalance. It defines the vortex mass as the sum of an associated mass (expelled superfluid) and an internal mass (excess normal component), computes radial profiles from the EFT coefficients and local-density-approximation densities, and presents results across the BEC–BCS crossover at zero and finite temperature. The central new claim is a strong, non-monotonic interplay between imbalance and temperature: at low but nonzero temperature the vortex mass is enhanced, most dramatically on the BEC side for ζ/ζc = 0.9 (more than doubling near T/Tc ~ 0.2), while at higher temperatures the mass is suppressed by imbalance. The paper identifies these regimes as favorable for future experimental observation of vortex inertia.

Significance. The paper is a forward computation from a published EFT; no parameters are fitted to the vortex-mass result, and the EFT coefficients, density integrals, and asymptotic forms are given explicitly in Appendix A. If the finite-temperature predictions are valid, they provide concrete, experimentally testable statements about where vortex inertia should be observable in box-trapped imbalanced Fermi gases, a topic of current experimental interest. The main strength is the explicit, transparent derivation of the zero-temperature results and the identification of a non-trivial temperature-dependence mechanism. However, the central finite-temperature predictive claim currently rests on an unstated assumption about the superfluid phase boundary, and the manuscript must address this before the results can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Fig. 4, Appendix B] The finite-temperature curves are labeled by ζ/ζc, where ζc is the zero-temperature critical imbalance, and the horizontal axis is T/Tc without specifying whether Tc is the balanced value or the ζ-dependent superfluid transition temperature. Appendix B provides only the zero-temperature phase diagram. For an imbalanced superfluid the transition temperature is reduced below the balanced value; for ζ/ζc = 0.9 the superfluid domain can end well below the balanced Tc. Portions of the curves in Fig. 4, especially near T/Tc = 1, may therefore lie in the normal or phase-separated region, where the vortex Ansatz (9), the LDA densities (4)–(7), and the mass integrals (1)–(2) are not defined. The qualitative conclusion in §5 that at larger temperatures imbalance suppresses the vortex mass may be an artifact of over-extending the superfluid calculation. The authors should compute and display the fi
  2. [§4.2] Even if the phase-boundary issue is resolved, the manuscript does not state how the radial order-parameter profile f(r) is obtained at finite T and finite ζ. Appendix A, Fig. A1, shows only zero-temperature profiles. Since the EFT coefficients C, G, and the density functionals depend explicitly on T and ζ, the profiles used in Eqs. (1)–(2) at finite temperature must be recomputed. The text should specify the numerical procedure and, ideally, show representative finite-temperature profiles, because the claimed non-monotonic mass enhancement is sensitive to the core structure encoded in f(r).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption mentions 'the mass of the imbalanced component', but this quantity is not defined in the main text. Please define it explicitly (presumably an integral of the imbalance density) and relate it to M_a and M_i.
  2. [§4.2] The phrase 'critical imbalance potential' should be 'critical imbalance chemical potential' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  3. [Declarations] Typo: 'F unding' should be 'Funding'.
  4. [References] Reference [2]: 'Legett' should be 'Leggett'.
  5. [§2] The discussion of the EFT validity would benefit from a sentence stating explicitly that all finite-temperature results are obtained by recomputing the bulk quantities Δ and μ from the finite-temperature saddle-point equations, rather than using zero-temperature values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: forward EFT calculation, no fitted outputs; same-author citations are to published prior derivations that do not assume the imbalance result.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The derivation chain is a forward computation: from the microscopic action (A1) the EFT coefficients (A10–A19) are evaluated with the imbalance parameter ζ, the saddle-point equations (B23) fix µ and ∆, the radial profile is obtained from the stationary equation of motion (A22) for the vortex Ansatz (9), and the masses (1)–(2) are then evaluated numerically — the α factors are computed by evaluating the integrals, not fitted to any target output. Nothing in the input 'assumes' the central claim: the non-monotonic temperature dependence and the factor-of-two enhancement for ζ/ζc = 0.9 in the BEC regime emerge from the calculation and are not contained in the defining equations. The considerable same-author self-citation ([36] for Eqs. (15)–(16), the asymptotic profile (10) and the imaginary-time method; [52,53] for the gradient expansion of the action, with author overlap via J. Tempere) is load-bearing methodology, but under the rubric these citations are independent support: [36] is a published, peer-reviewed derivation whose stated assumptions (balanced gas, EFT validity regime) do not include the population-imbalance result, and the code for the present figures is promised on GitHub. A real caveat, orthogonal to circularity, is that Fig. 4 normalizes temperature by the balanced Tc while ζc is stated to be its zero-temperature value ('The critical imbalance chemical potential ζc is computed at temperature zero'); the finite-temperature superfluid boundary Tc(ζ) is never imposed, so for ζ/ζc = 0.9 parts of the plotted curves, particularly near T/Tc = 1, may lie in the normal phase where the vortex Ansatz (9) has no solution. That is a validity/correctness concern about the high-temperature 'suppression' claim, not an input–output identity, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation relies on a chain of model assumptions from prior work [36] and the mean-field EFT framework. No genuinely new entities are introduced; the 'imbalance chemical potential' ζ is a standard thermodynamic parameter already present in the cited Fermi-gas literature.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The vortex mass is given by M_tot = M_a + M_i with the integrals in Eqs. (1)-(2), as derived in Ref. [36].
    The paper extends this definition without re-deriving it; if the mass definition is incomplete or incorrect, all subsequent mass predictions change.
  • domain assumption The EFT gradient expansion is valid: the pair correlation length is much smaller than the healing length.
    Stated in Sec. 2; the authors acknowledge the EFT is most accurate near Tc or in the BEC regime, and only qualitative in the deep BCS regime.
  • domain assumption The local density approximation (LDA) is used for the total and normal densities in the vortex profile.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. 2; the LDA misses CdGM bound states, which are known to contribute to the internal vortex mass in Fermi superfluids.
  • domain assumption The mean-field (saddle-point) equation of state is used; beyond-mean-field effects (e.g., Gaussian pair fluctuations) are neglected.
    The authors state the mean-field equation of state is chosen for simplicity and could be replaced by a GPF equation of state.
  • domain assumption Zero-temperature analysis is restricted to the unpolarized superfluid phase; polarized superfluid, phase-separated, and FFLO phases are excluded.
    The authors state this restriction; the phase diagram in Appendix B shows these phases exist, and their exclusion limits the parameter regime of the claims.
  • domain assumption The vortex is modeled by a radially symmetric single-quantum ansatz Φ = Δ f(r) e^{iφ}.
    Standard ansatz for an isolated straight vortex; the paper does not consider vortex bending or multi-vortex configurations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of Population Imbalance on Vortex Mass in Superfluid Fermi Gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3VXWELOL

@misc{pith2026251222099,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of Population Imbalance on Vortex Mass in Superfluid Fermi Gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3VXWELOL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.22099}
}
read the original abstract

One of the fundamental parameters associated with quantized vortices in superfluids is the vortex mass, which is the inertia of a vortex. As of yet, this mass has not been observed in a superfluid. However, ultracold Fermi gases provide a promising platform in which recently much experimental progress was made, offering tunability of the interaction as well as control on the single-vortex level. Not only can the scattering length be freely tuned, allowing exploration of the BEC-BCS crossover, but also an imbalance between different pseudospin states can be introduced. We study the effect of introducing this imbalance on the vortex mass, using a method based on an effective field theory for superfluid Fermi gases. We find that it is crucial to consider the imbalance in conjunction with nonzero temperatures; at some temperatures, the vortex mass is significantly enhanced while at others, the vortex mass is diminished. This pronounced temperature dependence highlights the need for careful tuning of experimental conditions and identifies favorable parameter regimes in which the vortex mass is likely to be observed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    Physical Review A112(4) (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/p24p-k59v

    Levrouw, L., Takeuchi, H., Tempere, J.: Vortex mass in superfluid Fermi gases along the BEC-BCS crossover. Physical Review A112(4) (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/p24p-k59v

    work page doi:10.1103/p24p-k59v 2025

  2. [1]

    Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics37(2), 341–345 (1973)

    Popov, V.N.: Quantum vortices and phase transitions in Bose systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics37(2), 341–345 (1973)

    1973

  3. [2]

    Physical Review Letters68(8), 1216–1219 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.68.1216

    Duan, J.-M., Legett, A.J.: Inertial Mass of a Moving Singularity in a Fermi Super- fluid. Physical Review Letters68(8), 1216–1219 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.68.1216

    1992

  4. [3]

    Physical Review B49(17), 12381–12383 (1994) https://doi.org/10

    Duan, J.-M.: Mass of a vortex line in superfluid 4He: Effects of gauge-symmetry breaking. Physical Review B49(17), 12381–12383 (1994) https://doi.org/10. 14 1103/PhysRevB.49.12381

    1994

  5. [4]

    Baym, G., Chandler, E.: The hydrodynamics of rotating superfluids. I. Zero- temperature, nondissipative theory. Journal of Low Temperature Physics50(1), 57–87 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00681839

    doi:10.1007/bf00681839 1983

  6. [5]

    JETP Letters27(7), 390 (1978)

    Kopnin, N.B.: Frequency singularities of the dissipation in the mixed state of pure type-II superconductors at low temperatures. JETP Letters27(7), 390 (1978)

    1978

  7. [6]

    Physical Review Letters81(18), 3952–3955 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3952

    Kopnin, N.B., Vinokur, V.M.: Dynamic Vortex Mass in Clean Fermi Superfluids and Superconductors. Physical Review Letters81(18), 3952–3955 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3952

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3952 1998

  8. [7]

    publ edn

    Donnelly, R.J.: Quantized Vortices in Helium II, 1. publ edn. Cambridge Studies in Low Temperature Physics, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    1991

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Physical Review Letters110(22), 225301 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.225301

    Navarro, R., Carretero-Gonz´ alez, R., Torres, P.J., Kevrekidis, P.G., Frantzeskakis, D.J., Ray, M.W., Altunta¸ s, E., Hall, D.S.: Dynamics of a Few Corotating Vortices in Bose-Einstein Condensates. Physical Review Letters110(22), 225301 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevL...

    2013 doi

  2. [9]

    Physical Review A93(2), 023603 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.93.023603

    Samson, E.C., Wilson, K.E., Newman, Z.L., Anderson, B.P.: Deterministic creation, pinning, and manipulation of quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Physical Review A93(2), 023603 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.93.023603

    2016

  3. [10]

    Physical Review Letters14(7), 226–229 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.226

    Suhl, H.: Inertial Mass of a Moving Fluxoid. Physical Review Letters14(7), 226–229 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.226

    1965 doi

  4. [11]

    Low Temperature Physics33(12), 1019–1022 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2747080

    Fil, V.D., Ignatova, T.V., Burma, N.G., Petrishin, A.I., Fil, D.V., Shitsevalova, N.Yu.: Mass of an Abrikosov vortex. Low Temperature Physics33(12), 1019–1022 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2747080

    2007 doi

  5. [12]

    Physical Review B85(6), 060504 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85

    Golubchik, D., Polturak, E., Koren, G.: Mass of a vortex in a superconducting film measured via magneto-optical imaging plus ultrafast heating and cooling. Physical Review B85(6), 060504 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85. 060504

    2012 doi

  6. [13]

    Scientific Reports11(1), 21708 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00846-x

    Tesaˇ r, R.,ˇSindler, M., Kadlec, C., Lipavsk´ y, P., Skrbek, L., Kol´ aˇ cek, J.: Mass of abrikosov vortex in high-temperature superconductor yba 2cu3o7−δ. Scientific Reports11(1), 21708 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00846-x

    2021 doi

  7. [14]

    Physical Review Letters133(3), 036004 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.036004 15

    Nakamura, S., Matsumoto, H., Ogawa, H., Kobayashi, T., Nabeshima, F., Maeda, A., Shimano, R.: Picosecond trajectory of two-dimensional vortex motion in fese0.5te0.5 visualized by terahertz second harmonic generation. Physical Review Letters133(3), 036004 (2024) https://doi.org...

    2024 doi

  8. [15]

    Nature499(7459), 426–430 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12338

    Yefsah, T., Sommer, A.T., Ku, M.J.H., Cheuk, L.W., Ji, W., Bakr, W.S., Zwier- lein, M.W.: Heavy solitons in a fermionic superfluid. Nature499(7459), 426–430 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12338

    2013 doi

  9. [16]

    Physical Review Letters113(6), 065301 (2014) https://doi.org/10

    Ku, M.J.H., Ji, W., Mukherjee, B., Guardado-Sanchez, E., Cheuk, L.W., Yef- sah, T., Zwierlein, M.W.: Motion of a Solitonic Vortex in the BEC-BCS Crossover. Physical Review Letters113(6), 065301 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.113.065301

    2014

  10. [17]

    Nature600(7887), 64–69 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Kwon, W.J., Del Pace, G., Xhani, K., Galantucci, L., Muzi Falconi, A., Inguscio, M., Scazza, F., Roati, G.: Sound emission and annihilations in a programmable quantum vortex collider. Nature600(7887), 64–69 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-021-04047-4

    2021

  11. [18]

    Physical Review X12(4), 041037 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.041037

    Del Pace, G., Xhani, K., Muzi Falconi, A., Fedrizzi, M., Grani, N., Hernan- dez Rajkov, D., Inguscio, M., Scazza, F., Kwon, W.J., Roati, G.: Imprinting Persistent Currents in Tunable Fermionic Rings. Physical Review X12(4), 041037 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.041037

    2022 doi

  12. [19]

    Nature Physics20(6), 939–944 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02466-4 arXiv:2303.12631 [cond-mat]

    Hernandez-Rajkov, D., Grani, N., Scazza, F., Pace, G.D., Kwon, W.J., Ingus- cio, M., Xhani, K., Fort, C., Modugno, M., Marino, F., Roati, G.: Connecting shear-flow and vortex array instabilities in annular atomic superfluids. Nature Physics20(6), 939–944 (2024) https://doi.org...

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    arXiv (2025)

    Grani, N., Hern´ andez-Rajkov, D., Daix, C., Pieri, P., Pini, M., Magierski, P., Wlaz lowski, G., Fern´ andez, M.F., Scazza, F., Pace, G.D., Roati, G.: Mutual fric- tion and vortex Hall angle in a strongly interacting Fermi superfluid. arXiv (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ar...

    2025 doi arXiv

  14. [21]

    Physical Review A101(1), 013630 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013630

    Richaud, A., Penna, V., Mayol, R., Guilleumas, M.: Vortices with massive cores in a binary mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A101(1), 013630 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013630

    2020 doi

  15. [22]

    Physical Review A103(2), 023311 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.023311

    Richaud, A., Penna, V., Fetter, A.L.: Dynamics of massive point vortices in a binary mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A103(2), 023311 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.023311

    2021 doi

  16. [23]

    The European Physical Journal Plus138(8), 676 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04294-6

    Bellettini, A., Richaud, A., Penna, V.: Relative dynamics of quantum vortices and massive cores in binary BECs. The European Physical Journal Plus138(8), 676 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04294-6

    2023 doi

  17. [24]

    Physical Review A92(5), 053602 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Wacker, L., Jørgensen, N.B., Birkmose, D., Horchani, R., Ertmer, W., Klempt, C., Winter, N., Sherson, J., Arlt, J.J.: Tunable dual-species bose-einstein condensates of 39K and 87Rb. Physical Review A92(5), 053602 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.92.053602 16

    2015

  18. [25]

    Physical Review Research4(4), 043072 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.043072

    Franzen, T., Guttridge, A., Wilson, K.E., Segal, J., Frye, M.D., Hutson, J.M., Cornish, S.L.: Observation of magnetic feshbach resonances between cs and 173Yb. Physical Review Research4(4), 043072 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.043072

    2022

  19. [26]

    Physical Review A106(3), 033319 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033319

    Wilson, K.E., Samson, E.C., Newman, Z.L., Anderson, B.P.: Generation of high- winding-number superfluid circulation in Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A106(3), 033319 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033319

    2022 doi

  20. [27]

    In: APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meet- ing Abstracts

    Wilson, K., Moutamani, O., Despard, I.: Vortex Dynamics in Binary Super- fluids. In: APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meet- ing Abstracts. APS Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2024, pp. 09–007 (2024). https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024APS..DMPR09007W

    2024

  21. [28]

    Physical Review A105(1), 013328 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA

    Takeuchi, H.: Spin-current instability at a magnetic domain wall in a ferro- magnetic superfluid: A generation mechanism of eccentric fractional skyrmions. Physical Review A105(1), 013328 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 105.013328

    2022 doi

  22. [29]

    Nature Physics21(9), 1398–1403 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02982-x

    Huh, S., Yun, W., Yun, G., Hwang, S., Kwon, K., Hur, J., Lee, S., Takeuchi, H., Kim, S.K., Choi, J.-y.: Stable singular fractional skyrmion spin texture from the quantum Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Nature Physics21(9), 1398–1403 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02982-x

    2025 doi

  23. [30]

    Physical Review A110(6), 063311 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.063311

    Kanjo, A., Takeuchi, H.: Universal description of massive point vortices and verifi- cation methods of vortex inertia in superfluids. Physical Review A110(6), 063311 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.063311

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    Science311(5760), 492–496 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122318

    Zwierlein, M.W., Schirotzek, A., Schunck, C.H., Ketterle, W.: Fermionic Super- fluidity with Imbalanced Spin Populations. Science311(5760), 492–496 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122318

    2006 doi

  25. [32]

    Science311(5760), 503–505 (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1122876

    Partridge, G.B., Li, W., Kamar, R.I., Liao, Y.-a., Hulet, R.G.: Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas. Science311(5760), 503–505 (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1122876

    2006 doi

  26. [33]

    Physical Review Letters118(12), 123401 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123401

    Mukherjee, B., Yan, Z., Patel, P.B., Hadzibabic, Z., Yefsah, T., Struck, J., Zwier- lein, M.W.: Homogeneous Atomic Fermi Gases. Physical Review Letters118(12), 123401 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123401

    2017 doi

  27. [34]

    Physical Review Letters98(6), 060406 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060406

    Hu, H., Liu, X.-J., Drummond, P.D.: Visualization of Vortex Bound States in Polarized Fermi Gases at Unitarity. Physical Review Letters98(6), 060406 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060406

    2007 doi

  28. [35]

    Physical Review Letters 97(18), 180407 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.180407 17

    Takahashi, M., Mizushima, T., Ichioka, M., Machida, K.: Vortex-Core Structure in Neutral Fermion Superfluids with Population Imbalance. Physical Review Letters 97(18), 180407 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.180407 17

    2006 doi

  29. [37]

    Physical Review A97(2), 023609 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.023609

    Simula, T.: Vortex mass in a superfluid. Physical Review A97(2), 023609 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.023609

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    Magnetized

    Sheehy, D.E., Radzihovsky, L.: BEC-BCS Crossover in “Magnetized” Feshbach- Resonantly Paired Superfluids. Physical Review Letters96(6), 060401 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.060401

    2006 doi

  31. [39]

    Nature Physics3(2), 124–128 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys520

    Parish, M.M., Marchetti, F.M., Lamacraft, A., Simons, B.D.: Finite-temperature phase diagram of a polarized Fermi condensate. Nature Physics3(2), 124–128 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys520

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    Reports on Progress in Physics73(7), 076501 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/73/7/076501

    Radzihovsky, L., Sheehy, D.E.: Imbalanced Feshbach-resonant Fermi gases. Reports on Progress in Physics73(7), 076501 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/73/7/076501

    2010

  33. [41]

    Physical Review135(3A), 550–563 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135

    Fulde, P., Ferrell, R.A.: Superconductivity in a Strong Spin-Exchange Field. Physical Review135(3A), 550–563 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135. A550

    1964 doi

  34. [42]

    Larkin, A., Ovchinnikov, Y.N.: Nonuniform state of superconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP20(3), 762–770 (1965)

    1965

  35. [43]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics59(3), 195–211 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00683774

    Nozi` eres, P., Schmitt-Rink, S.: Bose condensation in an attractive fermion gas: From weak to strong coupling superconductivity. Journal of Low Temperature Physics59(3), 195–211 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00683774

    1985 doi

  36. [44]

    Europhysics Letters74(4), 574 (2006) https://doi

    Hu, H., Liu, X.-J., Drummond, P.D.: Equation of state of a superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS-BEC crossover. Europhysics Letters74(4), 574 (2006) https://doi. org/10.1209/epl/i2006-10023-y

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    New Journal of Physics14(10), 103044 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103044

    Klimin, S.N., Tempere, J., Devreese, J.T.: Pseudogap and preformed pairs in the imbalanced Fermi gas in two dimensions. New Journal of Physics14(10), 103044 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103044

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    Physical Review A93(1), 013614 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.013614

    Lombardi, G., Van Alphen, W., Klimin, S.N., Tempere, J.: Soliton-core filling in superfluid Fermi gases with spin imbalance. Physical Review A93(1), 013614 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.013614

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems1(2), 151–159 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050165 18

    Marini, M., Pistolesi, F., Strinati, G.C.: Evolution from BCS superconductivity to Bose condensation: Analytic results for the crossover in three dimensions. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems1(2), 151–159 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1007/s100...

    1998 doi

  40. [48]

    Physical Review B89(22), 224508 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89

    Palestini, F., Strinati, G.C.: Temperature dependence of the pair coherence and healing lengths for a fermionic superfluid throughout the BCS-BEC crossover. Physical Review B89(22), 224508 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89. 224508

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    Physics Letters9(4), 307–309 (1964) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)90375-0

    Caroli, C., De Gennes, P.G., Matricon, J.: Bound Fermion states on a vortex line in a type II superconductor. Physics Letters9(4), 307–309 (1964) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)90375-0

    1964 doi

  42. [50]

    Physical Review Letters96(4), 040404 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.040404

    Botelho, S.S., S´ a de Melo, C.A.R.: Vortex-Antivortex Lattice in Ultracold Fermionic Gases. Physical Review Letters96(4), 040404 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.040404

    2006 doi

  43. [51]

    Physical Review A79(5), 053637 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79

    Tempere, J., Klimin, S.N., Devreese, J.T.: Effect of population imbalance on the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transition in a superfluid Fermi gas. Physical Review A79(5), 053637 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79. 053637

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    The European Physical Journal B88(5), 122 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2015-60213-4

    Klimin, S.N., Tempere, J., Lombardi, G., Devreese, J.T.: Finite tempera- ture effective field theory and two-band superfluidity in Fermi gases. The European Physical Journal B88(5), 122 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2015-60213-4

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (June 2017)

    Lombardi, G.: Effective field theory for superfluid Fermi gases: Application to polarons and solitons. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (June 2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    In: Gabovich, A

    Tempere, J., Devreese, J.P.A.: Path-Integral Description of Cooper Pairing. In: Gabovich, A. (ed.) Superconductors - Materials, Properties and Applications. InTech, London (2012). https://doi.org/10.5772/48458 19

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.