pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.23658 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-29 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

A Review of Community-Centric Power System Resilience: Strategies, Data-Driven Methods, and Techno-Legal Perspectives

Masoud H. Nazari , Hamid Varmazyari , Antar Kumar Biswas , Umit Cali , Hollis Belnap , Masood Parvania This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords community-centric resiliencepower system resiliencehigh-impact low-probability eventsdata-driven methodstechno-legal frameworksresilience hubsAI analyticsEU-US regulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Power system resilience to extreme events requires integrating community interdependencies with engineering strategies, AI methods, and EU-US regulatory frameworks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how power systems can better withstand high-impact low-probability events by combining traditional engineering upgrades with community-level considerations and legal governance. It shows that outages often cascade beyond wires to hit vulnerable populations and linked urban services, so purely technical fixes fall short without socioeconomic and regulatory angles. The review covers network hardening, resource scheduling, system reconfiguration, the rising use of AI for planning decisions, community resilience hubs, and cross-infrastructure links, while comparing how EU and US rules shape implementation. A reader would care because recent major blackouts demonstrated disproportionate harm to critical services and equity gaps that technical models alone miss. The work ends by flagging research gaps and next steps for more integrated approaches.

Core claim

By analyzing state-of-the-art engineering-based, AI-driven, and techno-legal methods for assessing and mitigating the impacts of high-impact, low-probability events, the review identifies critical research gaps and outlines promising directions for future investigation while emphasizing the integration of community-level resilience considerations and techno-legal governance frameworks with engineering-based resilience enhancement strategies and data-driven approaches.

What carries the argument

The community-centric perspective on resilience, which links power system engineering techniques such as hardening and reconfiguration, data-driven AI analytics, socioeconomic interdependencies, resilience hubs, and comparative EU-US regulatory frameworks to handle extreme events.

If this is right

  • Engineering strategies like network hardening and optimal scheduling must factor in community vulnerabilities to reduce disproportionate impacts on critical services.
  • AI and data-driven analytics become essential for real-time resilience planning and operational decisions during high-impact events.
  • Cross-infrastructure interconnections and behavioral dimensions require explicit modeling to capture full system effects.
  • Resilience hubs serve as practical mechanisms for delivering community support and reducing socioeconomic fallout from outages.
  • Regulatory comparisons between the EU and US highlight transferable practices for policy design and implementation across regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Equity-focused policies could emerge by prioritizing resilience investments in socioeconomically vulnerable areas identified through the community lens.
  • Hybrid models that merge physics-based simulations with machine learning might fill the identified gaps in predicting HILP event cascades.
  • Pilot testing of integrated frameworks in specific urban or rural settings would provide concrete validation data for scaling.
  • Extending the techno-legal analysis beyond EU-US cases could surface additional governance models applicable in other countries.

Load-bearing premise

The selected literature on engineering strategies, community interdependencies, and EU-US regulations supplies a sufficiently comprehensive and unbiased picture of current practices.

What would settle it

Empirical data showing that community interdependencies and regulatory differences produce no measurable improvement in outage recovery outcomes beyond standard engineering measures alone would undermine the integrated approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23658 by Antar Kumar Biswas, Hamid Varmazyari, Hollis Belnap, Masood Parvania, Masoud H. Nazari, Umit Cali.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Frequency and associated economic loss of U.S. extreme weather events. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fragility curve vs extreme event intensity as a function of wind speed (a), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the resilience triangle. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic diagram of the resilience trapezoid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Interdependency of critical infrastructure systems as a SoS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematics of a Resilience Hub. Beyond these community-facing roles, resilience hubs reflect the interdependence of community and grid resilience, addressing both immediate individual social vul￾nerability concerns and technical system-level performance issues [123]. A resilience hub may focus on supporting medically vulnerable populations, stabilizing public health services, ensuring access to cooling or … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Techno-legal framework for critical infrastructures as a part of SoS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of community-centric power system resilience, emphasizing the integration of community-level resilience considerations and techno-legal governance frameworks with engineering-based resilience enhancement strategies and data-driven approaches to address extreme events. Recent large-scale outages have demonstrated that power disruptions can cascade beyond electrical infrastructure and disproportionately affect vulnerable communities, critical services, and interconnected urban systems, highlighting the need for resilience approaches that integrate technical, social, and regulatory dimensions. Within this community-centric perspective, the review first summarizes state-of-the-art strategies for enhancing power system resilience, including network hardening, resource allocation, optimal scheduling, and system reconfiguration techniques, while highlighting the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven analytics in supporting resilience planning and operational decision-making. It then examines the interdependencies between power system resilience and community resilience, addressing socioeconomic and behavioral dimensions, cross-infrastructure interconnections, and the emerging role of resilience hubs. The paper further examines the techno-legal frameworks governing resilient energy systems by comparing the regulatory landscapes of the European Union (EU) and the United States, highlighting key similarities and distinctions that shape resilience planning and implementation. By analyzing state-of-the-art engineering-based, AI-driven, and techno-legal methods for assessing and mitigating the impacts of high-impact, low-probability (HILP) events, the review identifies critical research gaps and outlines promising directions for future investigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review synthesizes community-centric power system resilience by covering engineering strategies (network hardening, resource allocation, optimal scheduling, reconfiguration), AI/data-driven analytics for HILP event mitigation, interdependencies with community resilience (socioeconomic, behavioral, cross-infrastructure, resilience hubs), and techno-legal frameworks comparing EU and US regulatory landscapes. It identifies research gaps and future directions for integrating technical, social, and governance dimensions.

Significance. If the literature coverage is representative, the synthesis could usefully highlight how power outages cascade into community impacts and how regulatory differences shape implementation, providing a structured starting point for interdisciplinary work on resilience hubs and data-driven planning.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The manuscript provides no explicit literature search protocol (databases, search strings, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening process). This directly undermines the central claim that the selected works on engineering strategies, AI methods, community interdependencies, and EU-US regulations constitute a sufficiently complete and unbiased sample for gap identification.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Clarify the precise scope of 'community-centric' versus 'community resilience' early in the introduction to avoid interchangeable usage that blurs the paper's framing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the manuscript's synthesis of engineering strategies, data-driven methods, community interdependencies, and techno-legal perspectives on power system resilience. We agree that greater transparency on literature selection will strengthen the review and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript provides no explicit literature search protocol (databases, search strings, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening process). This directly undermines the central claim that the selected works on engineering strategies, AI methods, community interdependencies, and EU-US regulations constitute a sufficiently complete and unbiased sample for gap identification.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not include an explicit literature search protocol. The review was structured as a narrative synthesis of influential and recent works rather than a formal systematic review with PRISMA-style documentation. To address this concern directly, we will add a new subsection (e.g., in the Introduction) that explicitly describes the literature selection approach. This will include the primary databases consulted (IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science), representative search strings (such as combinations of “power system resilience”, “community-centric”, “HILP events”, “resilience hubs”, and “techno-legal frameworks”), the time window (primarily post-2015 with emphasis on 2020–2024), and inclusion criteria focused on works that integrate technical, socioeconomic, and regulatory dimensions. We will also clarify that the selection prioritizes highly cited contributions and emerging themes to identify gaps, while noting that it is not intended to be exhaustive. This addition will improve transparency without altering the review’s scope or claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: literature review with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper is a literature review that summarizes existing engineering strategies, AI-driven methods, community interdependencies, and EU-US regulatory frameworks without any original equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, self-definition, or renamed input. Claims about research gaps rest on analysis of externally cited works rather than internal construction. The absence of a detailed search protocol affects verifiability of completeness but does not create circularity in the derivation sense.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the work relies entirely on cited prior literature for its content and does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5573 in / 1019 out tokens · 17456 ms · 2026-05-16T19:00:01.850741+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters,

    National Center for Environment Information, “Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters,” , 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    A multi- hazard approach to assess severe weather-induced major power outage risks in the us,

    Mukherjee, Sayanti and Nateghi, Roshanak and Hastak, Makarand, “A multi- hazard approach to assess severe weather-induced major power outage risks in the us,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Weather-related power outages and electric system resiliency,

    Campbell, Richard J. and Lowry, Sean, “Weather-related power outages and electric system resiliency,” , 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Boosting the power grid resilience to extreme weather events using defensive islanding,

    Panteli, Mathaios and Trakas, Dimitris N and Mancarella, Pierluigi and Hatziargyriou, Nikos D, “Boosting the power grid resilience to extreme weather events using defensive islanding,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    A warning indicator for distribution network to extreme weather events,

    Sadeghi Khomami, Masoud and Tourandaz Kenari, Meghdad and Sepasian, Mohammad Sadegh, “A warning indicator for distribution network to extreme weather events,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2019. 30

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Resilience Metrics for the Electric Power System: A Performance-Based Ap- proach.,

    Vugrin, Eric D and Castillo, Andrea R and Silva-Monroy, Cesar Augusto, “Resilience Metrics for the Electric Power System: A Performance-Based Ap- proach.,” , 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities,

    Bruneau, Michel and Chang, Stephanie E and Eguchi, Ronald T and Lee, George C and O’Rourke, Thomas D and Reinhorn, Andrei M and Shinozuka, Masanobu and Tierney, Kathleen and Wallace, William A and Von Winter- feldt, Detlof, “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities,” Earthquake spectra, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Metrics and quantification of op- erational and infrastructure resilience in power systems,

    Panteli, Mathaios and Mancarella, Pierluigi and Trakas, Dimitris N and Kyr- iakides, Elias and Hatziargyriou, Nikos D, “Metrics and quantification of op- erational and infrastructure resilience in power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Frameworks, quan- titative indicators, characters, and modeling approaches to analysis of energy system resilience: A review,

    Ahmadi, Somayeh and Saboohi, Yadollah and Vakili, Ali, “Frameworks, quan- titative indicators, characters, and modeling approaches to analysis of energy system resilience: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    State-of-the- art review on power grid resilience to extreme weather events: Definitions, frameworks, quantitative assessment methodologies, and enhancement strate- gies,

    Jufri, Fauzan Hanif and Widiputra, Victor and Jung, Jaesung, “State-of-the- art review on power grid resilience to extreme weather events: Definitions, frameworks, quantitative assessment methodologies, and enhancement strate- gies,” Applied energy, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Power system resilience: Current practices, challenges, and future directions,

    Bhusal, Narayan and Abdelmalak, Michael and Kamruzzaman, Md and Benidris, Mohammed, “Power system resilience: Current practices, challenges, and future directions,” Ieee Access, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    A review on resilience studies in active distribution systems,

    Mishra, Dillip Kumar and Ghadi, Mojtaba Jabbari and Azizivahed, Ali and Li, Li and Zhang, Jiangfeng, “A review on resilience studies in active distribution systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021. 31

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters,

    Hossain, Eklas and Roy, Shidhartho and Mohammad, Naeem and Nawar, Nafiu and Dipta, Debopriya Roy, “Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters,” Applied energy, 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Resilience assess- ment of distribution systems integrated with distributed energy resources,

    Gautam, Prajjwal and Piya, Prasanna and Karki, Rajesh, “Resilience assess- ment of distribution systems integrated with distributed energy resources,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Multi-phase assessment and adaptation of power systems resilience to natural hazards,

    Espinoza, Sebasti, “Multi-phase assessment and adaptation of power systems resilience to natural hazards,” Electric Power Systems Research, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Battling the extreme: A study on the power system resilience,

    Bie, Zhaohong and Lin, Yanling and Li, Gengfeng and Li, Furong, “Battling the extreme: A study on the power system resilience,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Electrical power system resilience assessment: A compre- hensive approach,

    Sabouhi, Hamed and Doroudi, Aref and Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud and Bashiri, Mahdi, “Electrical power system resilience assessment: A compre- hensive approach,” IEEE Systems Journal, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Applicationofhardeningstrategiesanddgplacementtoimprovedistri- bution network resilience against earthquakes,

    Ahmadi, Mehdi and Bahrami, Mahdi and Vakilian, Mehdi and Lehtonen, Matti, “Applicationofhardeningstrategiesanddgplacementtoimprovedistri- bution network resilience against earthquakes,” 2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition-Latin America (T&D LA), 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Resiliency-oriented planning of transmission systems and distributed energy resources,

    Ranjbar, Hossein and Hosseini, Seyed Hamid and Zareipour, Hamidreza, “Resiliency-oriented planning of transmission systems and distributed energy resources,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Conceptualizing and measuring re- silience: A key to disaster loss reduction,

    Tierney, Kathleen and Bruneau, Michel, “Conceptualizing and measuring re- silience: A key to disaster loss reduction,” TR news, 2007

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Multi-dimensional hurricane re- silience assessment of electric power systems,

    Ouyang, Min and Duenas-Osorio, Leonardo, “Multi-dimensional hurricane re- silience assessment of electric power systems,” Structural Safety, 2014. 32

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Toward a consensus on the definition and taxonomy of power system resilience,

    Gholami, Amin and Shekari, Tohid and Amirioun, Mohammad Hassan and Aminifar, Farrokh and Amini, M Hadi and Sargolzaei, Arman, “Toward a consensus on the definition and taxonomy of power system resilience,” IEEE Access, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Frame- work for analytical quantification of disaster resilience,

    Cimellaro, Gian Paolo and Reinhorn, Andrei M and Bruneau, Michel, “Frame- work for analytical quantification of disaster resilience,” Engineering struc- tures, 2010

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems,

    Ouyang, Min and Due, “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems,” Structural safety, 2012

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Power systems resilience assessment: Hardening and smart operational enhancement strategies,

    Panteli, Mathaios and Trakas, Dimitris N and Mancarella, Pierluigi and Hatziargyriou, Nikos D, “Power systems resilience assessment: Hardening and smart operational enhancement strategies,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Mod- eling and optimizing recovery strategies for power distribution system re- silience,

    Arjomandi-Nezhad, Ali and Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud and Moeini-Aghtaie, Moein and Safdarian, Amir and Dehghanian, Payman and Wang, Fei, “Mod- eling and optimizing recovery strategies for power distribution system re- silience,” IEEE Systems Journal, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    A three-level planning model for optimal sizing of networked microgrids considering a trade- off between resilience and cost,

    Wang, Yi and Rousis, Anastasios Oulis and Strbac, Goran, “A three-level planning model for optimal sizing of networked microgrids considering a trade- off between resilience and cost,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Milp method based network reconfiguration considering customer sensitivity to the service interruptions,

    Song, Zitong and Zhang, Jianhua and Zhou, Qin, “Milp method based network reconfiguration considering customer sensitivity to the service interruptions,” 2016 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Con- ference (ISGT), 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    State-of-the-art review on power 33 system resilience and assessment techniques,

    Afzal, Suhail and Mokhlis, Hazlie and Illias, Hazlee Azil and Mansor, Nu- rulafiqah Nadzirah and Shareef, Hussain, “State-of-the-art review on power 33 system resilience and assessment techniques,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspec- tive of generation, network, and load,

    Wang, Chong and Ju, Ping and Wu, Feng and Pan, Xueping and Wang, Zhaoyu, “A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspec- tive of generation, network, and load,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    The effect of decision analysis on power system resilience and economic value during a severe weather event,

    Wu, Yuan-Kang and Chen, Yu-Chih and Chang, Hui-Ling and Hong, Jing- Shan, “The effect of decision analysis on power system resilience and economic value during a severe weather event,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Appli- cations, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    A comprehensive review and comparison of the fragility curves used for re- silience assessments in power systems,

    Serrano-Fontova, Alexandre and Li, Haiyu and Liao, Zhiyu and Jamieson, Magnus R and Serrano, Rosa and Parisio, Alessandra and Panteli, Mathaios, “A comprehensive review and comparison of the fragility curves used for re- silience assessments in power systems,” IEEE Access, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Power system resilience to extreme weather: Fragility modeling, probabilistic impact assessment, and adaptation measures,

    Panteli, Mathaios and Pickering, Cassandra and Wilkinson, Sean and Daw- son, Richard and Mancarella, Pierluigi, “Power system resilience to extreme weather: Fragility modeling, probabilistic impact assessment, and adaptation measures,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Fragility curves for assessing the resilience of electric- ity networks constructed from an extensive fault database,

    Dunn, Sarah and Wilkinson, Sean and Alderson, David and Fowler, Hayley and Galasso, Carmine, “Fragility curves for assessing the resilience of electric- ity networks constructed from an extensive fault database,” Natural Hazards Review, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Earthquake risk assessment: Certitudes, fallacies, uncer- tainties and the quest for soundness,

    Pitilakis, Kyriazis, “Earthquake risk assessment: Certitudes, fallacies, uncer- tainties and the quest for soundness,” Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology: Volume 2, 2015. 34

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Power outage prediction for natural hazards using syn- thetic power distribution systems,

    Zhai, Chengwei and Chen, Thomas Ying-jeh and White, Anna Grace and Guikema, Seth David, “Power outage prediction for natural hazards using syn- thetic power distribution systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Controlling weather field synthesis using variational autoencoders,

    Oliveira, Dario AB and Diaz, Jorge G and Zadrozny, Bianca and Watson, Campbell D and Zhu, Xiao Xiang, “Controlling weather field synthesis using variational autoencoders,” IGARSS 2022-2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    A deep reinforcement learning-based multi-agent framework to enhance power systemresilienceusingshuntresources,

    Kamruzzaman, Md and Duan, Jiajun and Shi, Di and Benidris, Mohammed, “A deep reinforcement learning-based multi-agent framework to enhance power systemresilienceusingshuntresources,” IEEETransactionsonPowerSystems, 2021

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Tri-level optimal hardening plan for a re- silient distribution system considering reconfiguration and DG islanding,

    Lin, Yanling and Bie, Zhaohong, “Tri-level optimal hardening plan for a re- silient distribution system considering reconfiguration and DG islanding,” Ap- plied Energy, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Ap- proaches for optimal planning of energy storage units in distribution network and their impacts on system resiliency,

    Venkateswaran, V Balaji and Saini, Devender K and Sharma, Madhu, “Ap- proaches for optimal planning of energy storage units in distribution network and their impacts on system resiliency,” CSEE Journal of power and energy systems, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Optimal resource allocation to enhance power grid resilience against hurricanes,

    Yang, Zejun and Mart, “Optimal resource allocation to enhance power grid resilience against hurricanes,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    The local team: Leveraging distributed resources to improve resilience,

    Arghandeh, Reza and Brown, Merwin and Del Rosso, Alberto and Ghatikar, Girish and Stewart, Emma and Vojdani, Ali and von Meier, Alexandra, “The local team: Leveraging distributed resources to improve resilience,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2014. 35

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Algorith- mic formulation for network resilience enhancement by optimal der hosting and placement,

    Dharmasena, Shamini and Olowu, Temitayo O and Sarwat, Arif I, “Algorith- mic formulation for network resilience enhancement by optimal der hosting and placement,” IEEE Access, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Proactive repair crew deployment to improve transmission system resilience against hurricanes,

    Bian, Yiheng and Bie, Zhaohong and Li, Gengfeng, “Proactive repair crew deployment to improve transmission system resilience against hurricanes,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Power distribution system outage management with co-optimization of repairs, re- configuration, and DG dispatch,

    Arif, Anmar and Wang, Zhaoyu and Wang, Jianhui and Chen, Chen, “Power distribution system outage management with co-optimization of repairs, re- configuration, and DG dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    A review of machine learning applications in power system resilience,

    Xie, Jian and Alvarez-Fernandez, Inalvis and Sun, Wei, “A review of machine learning applications in power system resilience,” 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Machine learning based occupant behavior prediction in smart building to improve energy efficiency,

    Fatehi, Nina and Politis, Alexander and Lin, Li and Stobby, Martin and Nazari, Masoud H, “Machine learning based occupant behavior prediction in smart building to improve energy efficiency,” 2023 IEEE Power & Energy So- ciety Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Enhancing weather-related power outage prediction by event severity classification,

    Yang, Feifei and Watson, Peter and Koukoula, Marika and Anagnostou, Em- manouil N, “Enhancing weather-related power outage prediction by event severity classification,” IEEE Access, 2020

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    AdaBoost+ = An ensemble learning approach for estimating weather-related outages in dis- tribution systems,

    Kankanala, Padmavathy and Das, Sanjoy and Pahwa, Anil, “AdaBoost+ = An ensemble learning approach for estimating weather-related outages in dis- tribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Leveraging de- centralizedartificialintelligencetoenhanceresilienceofenergynetworks,

    Imteaj, Ahmed and Amini, M Hadi and Mohammadi, Javad, “Leveraging de- centralizedartificialintelligencetoenhanceresilienceofenergynetworks,” 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 2020. 36

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Machine learning based power grid outage prediction in response to extreme events,

    Eskandarpour, Rozhin and Khodaei, Amin, “Machine learning based power grid outage prediction in response to extreme events,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Autoregressive modeling of utility customer outages with deep neural networks,

    Udeh, Kingsley and Wanik, David W and Cerrai, Diego and Aguiar, Derek and Anagnostou, Emmanouil, “Autoregressive modeling of utility customer outages with deep neural networks,” 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2022

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Improved quantitative prediction of power outages caused by extreme weather events,

    Watson, Peter L and Spaulding, Aaron and Koukoula, Marika and Anagnos- tou, Emmanouil, “Improved quantitative prediction of power outages caused by extreme weather events,” Weather and Climate Extremes, 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Deep Reinforcement Learning for Distribution Power Sys- tem Cyber-Resilience via Distributed Energy Resource Control,

    Corrado, Nicholas E and Livesay, Michael and Bailey, Tyson and Johnson, Jay and Levin, Drew, “Deep Reinforcement Learning for Distribution Power Sys- tem Cyber-Resilience via Distributed Energy Resource Control,” 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Tech- nologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Deep reinforcement learning-based model-free on-line dynamic multi- microgrid formation to enhance resilience,

    Zhao, Jin and Li, Fangxing and Mukherjee, Srijib and Sticht, Christo- pher, “Deep reinforcement learning-based model-free on-line dynamic multi- microgrid formation to enhance resilience,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Reconfiguration of distribu- tion networks for resilience enhancement: A deep reinforcement learning-based approach,

    Gautam, Mukesh and Abdelmalak, Michael and MansourLakouraj, Moham- mad and Benidris, Mohammed and Livani, Hanif, “Reconfiguration of distribu- tion networks for resilience enhancement: A deep reinforcement learning-based approach,” 2022 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Network reconfigu- 37 ration for enhanced operational resilience using reinforcement learning,

    Abdelmalak, Michael and Gautam, Mukesh and Morash, Sean and Snyder, Aaron F and Hotchkiss, Eliza and Benidris, Mohammed, “Network reconfigu- 37 ration for enhanced operational resilience using reinforcement learning,” 2022 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST), 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Post-Disaster Microgrid Formation for Enhanced Distribu- tion System Resilience,

    Gautam, Mukesh and Abdelmalak, Michael and Ben-Idris, Mohammed and Hotchkiss, Eliza, “Post-Disaster Microgrid Formation for Enhanced Distribu- tion System Resilience,” 2022 Resilience Week (RWS), 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Resilience microgrid as power system in- tegrity protection scheme element with reinforcement learning based manage- ment,

    Tightiz, Lilia and Yang, Hyosik, “Resilience microgrid as power system in- tegrity protection scheme element with reinforcement learning based manage- ment,” IEEE Access, 2021

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Integrating reinforcement learning and optimal power dispatch to enhance power grid resilience,

    Li, Qingming and Zhang, Xi and Guo, Jianbo and Shan, Xiwen and Wang, Zuowei and Li, Zhen and Chi, K Tse, “Integrating reinforcement learning and optimal power dispatch to enhance power grid resilience,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2021

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Postdis- aster Routing of Movable Energy Resources for Enhanced Distribution System Resilience: A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Approach,

    Gautam, Mukesh and Bhusal, Narayan and Ben-Idris, Mohammed, “Postdis- aster Routing of Movable Energy Resources for Enhanced Distribution System Resilience: A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Approach,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 2023

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Towards mi- crogrid resilience enhancement via mobile power sources and repair crews: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,

    Wang, Yi and Qiu, Dawei and Teng, Fei and Strbac, Goran, “Towards mi- crogrid resilience enhancement via mobile power sources and repair crews: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE transactions on power systems, 2023

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Weather-driven predictive control of a battery storage for improved microgrid resilience,

    Gutierrez-Rojas, Daniel and Mashlakov, Aleksei and Brester, Christina and Niska, Harri and Kolehmainen, Mikko and Narayanan, Arun and Honkapuro, Samuli and Nardelli, Pedro HJ, “Weather-driven predictive control of a battery storage for improved microgrid resilience,” IEEE Access, 2021. 38

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    A Com- parative Study between Bayesian Network and hybrid Statistical Predictive models for Proactive Power System Network Resilience Enhancement Opera- tional Planning,

    Omogoye, Samuel O and Folly, Komla A and Awodele, Kehinde O, “A Com- parative Study between Bayesian Network and hybrid Statistical Predictive models for Proactive Power System Network Resilience Enhancement Opera- tional Planning,” IEEE Access, 2023

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    A Transductive Graph Neural Network learning for Grid Resilience Analy- sis,

    Gautam, Priyanka and Sreejith, Amulya and Natarajan, Balasubramaniam, “A Transductive Graph Neural Network learning for Grid Resilience Analy- sis,” 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), 2023

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Increasing resilience of power systems using intentional islanding; a comparison of Binary genetic algorithm and deep learning based method,

    Paradell, Pol and Spyridis, Yannis and Colet, Alba and Ivanova, Anzhelika and Dom, “Increasing resilience of power systems using intentional islanding; a comparison of Binary genetic algorithm and deep learning based method,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR), 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Machine Learning-Aided Enhancement of Power Grid Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulse Strikes,

    Zhang, Ruotan and Li, Yifu and Hijazi, Maeshal and Su, Jinshun and Dehgha- nian, Payman and Etemadi, Amir H, “Machine Learning-Aided Enhancement of Power Grid Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulse Strikes,” 2022 North Amer- ican Power Symposium (NAPS), 2022

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Resilience-Oriented Restoration Strategy of Networked Microgrids Considering Grid Topology Against Data Intrusion Attacks,

    A. Yaldiz, T. Gökçek, O. Erdinç, and Y. Ateş “Resilience-Oriented Restoration Strategy of Networked Microgrids Considering Grid Topology Against Data Intrusion Attacks,” 2023 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST), 2023

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    A deep learning based multiobjective opti- mization for the planning of resilience oriented microgrids in active distribu- tion system,

    Vilaisarn, Youthanalack and Rodrigues, Yuri R and Abdelaziz, Morad Mo- hamed Abdelmageed and Cros, “A deep learning based multiobjective opti- mization for the planning of resilience oriented microgrids in active distribu- tion system,” IEEE Access, 2022. 39

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Adata-drivenapproachtoquantifysocial vulnerability to power outages: California case study,

    Loni, AbdolahandAsadi, Somayeh, “Adata-drivenapproachtoquantifysocial vulnerability to power outages: California case study,” Applied Energy, 2024

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Do renewable en- ergy communities deliver energy justice? Exploring insights from 71 European cases,

    Hanke, Florian and Guyet, Rachel and Feenstra, Marielle, “Do renewable en- ergy communities deliver energy justice? Exploring insights from 71 European cases,” Energy Research & Social Science, 2021

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Power outage preparedness and concern among vulnerable New York City residents,

    Dominianni, Christine and Ahmed, Munerah and Johnson, Sarah and Blum, Micheline and Ito, Kazuhiko and Lane, Kathryn, “Power outage preparedness and concern among vulnerable New York City residents,” Journal of urban health, 2018

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Power outages and community health: a narrative review,

    Casey, Joan A and Fukurai, Mihoka and Hern, “Power outages and community health: a narrative review,” Current environmental health reports, 2020

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Resilience enhancement strategies for power distribution network coupled with urban transportation system,

    Wang, Xu and Shahidehpour, Mohammad and Jiang, Chuanwen and Li, Zhiyi, “Resilience enhancement strategies for power distribution network coupled with urban transportation system,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Seismic resilience assessment of interdependent urban transportation-electric power system under uncertainty,

    Zhang, Wangxin and Han, Qiang and Shang, Wen-Long and Xu, Chengshun, “Seismic resilience assessment of interdependent urban transportation-electric power system under uncertainty,” Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Integrated planning of electricity and natu- ral gas transportation systems for enhancing the power grid resilience,

    Shao, Chengcheng and Shahidehpour, Mohammad and Wang, Xifan and Wang, Xiuli and Wang, Biyang, “Integrated planning of electricity and natu- ral gas transportation systems for enhancing the power grid resilience,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    On the rising interdependency between the power grid, ICT network, and E-mobility: modeling and analysis,

    Mohamed, Ahmed Ali A, “On the rising interdependency between the power grid, ICT network, and E-mobility: modeling and analysis,” Energies, 2019. 40

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    EXECUTIVE ORDER EO 13010 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION,

    President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, “EXECUTIVE ORDER EO 13010 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION,” , 2025

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Computational social science in smart power systems: Reliability, resilience, and restoration,

    Valinejad, Jaber and Mili, Lamine and Yu, Xinghuo and Van Der Wal, C Natalie and Xu, Yijun, “Computational social science in smart power systems: Reliability, resilience, and restoration,” Energy Conversion and Economics, 2023

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    Understanding cascading risks through real-world interdependent urban infrastructure,

    Brunner, Logan G and Peer, RAM and Zorn, C and Paulik, R and Logan, TM, “Understanding cascading risks through real-world interdependent urban infrastructure,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.