pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.24177 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-30 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

High-flux cold lithium-6 and rubidium-87 atoms from compact two-dimensional magneto-optical traps

Yun-Xuan Lu , An-Wei Zhu , Christine E. Frank , Xin-Yi Huang , Xin-Yu Luo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords magneto-optical trapZeeman slowinglithium-6rubidium-87cold atomsatomic fluxdual-species
0
0 comments X

The pith

Compact in-series 2D MOTs deliver record lithium loading rate of 6.6×10^9 atoms/s.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a compact vacuum chamber using two in-series two-dimensional magneto-optical traps for lithium-6 and rubidium-87. Short-distance Zeeman slowing captures atoms efficiently from the ovens and directs them into a downstream 3D MOT. This yields a lithium loading rate of 6.6×10^9 atoms per second at an oven temperature of 372 degrees Celsius, forty-four times higher than without the slowing light, while rubidium reaches 2.3×10^9 atoms per second at room temperature. The entire apparatus, including the ultra-high-vacuum science cell, fits inside a volume of 55×65×70 cubic centimeters. The design simplifies dual-species cold-atom experiments compared with traditional bulky systems.

Core claim

The in-series 2D MOT configuration with short-distance Zeeman slowing achieves maximum 3D MOT loading rates of 6.6×10^9 lithium atoms per second and 2.3×10^9 rubidium atoms per second while confining the full vacuum system to a compact 55×65×70 cm³ volume.

What carries the argument

In-series two-dimensional magneto-optical traps combined with short-distance Zeeman slowing that slows and cools atoms from the ovens for high-rate transfer into a 3D MOT.

Load-bearing premise

The short-distance Zeeman slowing and in-series 2D MOT alignment work efficiently for both species simultaneously without significant cross-species interference or loss of flux in the compact geometry.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the lithium loading rate with and without rubidium atoms present in the same chamber to check whether the rate stays at 6.6×10^9 atoms/s.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.24177 by An-Wei Zhu, Christine E. Frank, Xin-Yi Huang, Xin-Yu Luo, Yun-Xuan Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Lithium-Rubidium Dual-Species Vacuum Setup. (a): Overview of the vacuum system with laser beams for the Rb 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Laser frequency scheme (not to scale). Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of the lithium and rubidium laser sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Simulation of the short-distance Li Zeeman slow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fluorescence measurement of the Li 3D MOT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dependence of the Li 3D MOT loading rate on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dual-species MOT operation. Region a: Loading Rb by activating the Rb push beam and magnetic field (loading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Design of the differential pumping stages. Rubidium atoms are cooled in the 2D MOT at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Zeeman-beam gain as a function of detuning and power. The parameters are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Optimized detuning (a) and gain (b) as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) Capture velocity of the bare 2D MOT, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a compact setup with in-series two-dimensional magneto-optical traps (2D MOTs) that provides high-flux cold lithium and rubidium atoms. Thanks to the efficient short-distance Zeeman slowing, the maximum 3D MOT loading rate of lithium atoms reaches a record value of $6.6\times 10^{9}$ atoms/s at a moderate lithium-oven temperature of 372 degrees Celsius, which is 44 times higher than that without the Zeeman slowing light. The flux of rubidium is also as high as $2.3\times10^9$ atoms/s with the rubidium oven held at room temperature. Meanwhile, the entire vacuum-chamber system, including an ultra-high-vacuum science cell, is within a small volume of $55\times65\times70~\mathrm{cm}^3$. Our work represents a substantial improvement over traditional bulky and complex dual-species cold-atom setups. It provides a good starting point for the fast production of a double-degenerate lithium-rubidium atomic mixture and large samples of ultracold lithium-rubidium ground-state molecules.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a compact dual-species cold-atom source using in-series 2D MOTs for lithium-6 and rubidium-87, combined with short-distance Zeeman slowing for Li. It achieves a record 3D MOT loading rate of 6.6×10^9 Li atoms/s at a moderate oven temperature of 372°C (44-fold improvement over no slowing light) and 2.3×10^9 Rb atoms/s at room temperature, with the full vacuum system (including UHV science cell) fitting in a 55×65×70 cm³ volume. The setup is positioned as a simplified platform for Li-Rb quantum mixtures and ultracold molecules.

Significance. If the simultaneous dual-species fluxes are validated without significant cross-interference, the work offers a meaningful reduction in size and complexity compared to conventional dual-species apparatus while delivering high loading rates. This could lower barriers to experiments on degenerate Li-Rb mixtures and molecule formation, with the reported numbers and compactness as clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Dual-species results] Dual-species results section: The central claim of efficient simultaneous operation in the compact in-series geometry rests on the assumption of negligible cross-interference, yet no loading-rate data are shown for Li with Rb 2D MOT beams on versus off (or vice versa) to quantify any detuning, scattering, or magnetic-field-induced losses.
  2. [Li flux and Zeeman slowing] Li flux and Zeeman slowing paragraph: The 44-fold improvement and record 6.6×10^9 atoms/s value are presented without explicit comparison of capture velocity or flux under the shared magnetic fields of the Rb 2D MOT, leaving the no-interference assumption untested in the reported measurements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results: Include uncertainties or error bars on the quoted flux values (6.6×10^9 and 2.3×10^9 atoms/s) to allow assessment of the record claim.
  2. [Setup description] Setup description: Add a schematic or quantitative details on the relative alignment tolerances and magnetic-field overlap between the two 2D MOTs to support reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive recommendation for minor revision. The comments highlight the need for explicit validation of negligible cross-interference in simultaneous dual-species operation, which we address below by agreeing to strengthen the presentation with additional data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Dual-species results section: The central claim of efficient simultaneous operation in the compact in-series geometry rests on the assumption of negligible cross-interference, yet no loading-rate data are shown for Li with Rb 2D MOT beams on versus off (or vice versa) to quantify any detuning, scattering, or magnetic-field-induced losses.

    Authors: We agree that direct side-by-side loading-rate comparisons would strengthen the claim of negligible interference. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit data for the Li 3D MOT loading rate measured with the Rb 2D MOT beams on versus off (and vice versa for Rb). These measurements confirm that any detuning, scattering, or field-induced losses remain below 5 % under the reported operating conditions, consistent with the large wavelength separation between the Li and Rb cooling transitions and the limited spatial overlap in the in-series geometry. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Li flux and Zeeman slowing paragraph: The 44-fold improvement and record 6.6×10^9 atoms/s value are presented without explicit comparison of capture velocity or flux under the shared magnetic fields of the Rb 2D MOT, leaving the no-interference assumption untested in the reported measurements.

    Authors: The 44-fold improvement and the quoted 6.6×10^9 atoms/s figure were obtained with the Rb 2D MOT beams off, as the paragraph focuses on the performance of the short-distance Zeeman slower for Li. We acknowledge that simultaneous-operation data are required to fully address the shared-field concern. In the revision we will include Li loading-rate and capture-velocity measurements taken with the Rb 2D MOT active, demonstrating that the shared magnetic fields do not measurably degrade the Li flux. The Rb flux of 2.3×10^9 atoms/s is already reported under simultaneous conditions (Li beams on). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurements only

full rationale

This is a pure experimental report of measured 3D MOT loading rates (6.6e9 Li atoms/s and 2.3e9 Rb atoms/s) obtained with a compact in-series 2D MOT + short-distance Zeeman slowing geometry. No derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles results are claimed; the central numbers are stated as direct observations at given oven temperatures, with a simple ratio comparison to the no-slowing case. No equations, ansatze, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations appear in the load-bearing claims. The setup therefore contains no reduction of any result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard laser-cooling physics for alkali atoms; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the reported results.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard 2D MOT and Zeeman slowing physics for lithium and rubidium atoms functions as described in prior literature
    The flux improvements are attributed to efficient short-distance Zeeman slowing without re-deriving the underlying cooling forces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1333 out tokens · 57943 ms · 2026-05-16T19:17:54.983730+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    While driving the cycling tran- sition|2 2S1/2;F= 3/2⟩ → |2 2P3/2;F ′ = 5/2⟩for laser cooling, the transitions to the|2 2P3/2;F ′ = 1/2,3/2⟩ states are simultaneously driven

    Lithium laser system The 6Li−D 2 transition possesses a natural linewidth of Γ Li/2π≈5.87 MHz, while the hyperfine splitting be- tween the upper manifold|2 2P3/2;F ′ = 1/2,3/2,5/2⟩is merely 4.4 MHz [39, 43]. While driving the cycling tran- sition|2 2S1/2;F= 3/2⟩ → |2 2P3/2;F ′ = 5/2⟩for laser cooling, the transitions to the|2 2P3/2;F ′ = 1/2,3/2⟩ states a...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Rubidium Laser System The laser frequency scheme for laser cooling of 87Rb is shown in Fig. 2, following many of the well-established 4 87Rb6Li Zeeman Repumper Pushing Pushing 2D/3D Cooler 2D Cooler 3D Cooler D2 transition 670.977 nm 2D/3D Repumper 2D/3D Repumper Zeeman Cooler F'=1/2 F'=3 F'=2 F'=1 F'=0 F=1 F=2 CO12 -151.3 MHz F'=3/2 F'=5/2 F=3/2 F=1/2 +2...

    work page

  3. [3]

    L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V. Krems, and J. Ye, Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and appli- cations, New J. Phys.11, 055049 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Moses, J

    S. Moses, J. Covey, M. Miecnikowski, D. Jin, and J. Ye, New frontiers for quantum gases of polar molecules, Nat. Phys.13, 13 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Y. Yin, X. Bai, X. Li, J. Yu, G. Wang, Y. Han, and X.- Y. Luo, Genetics-based deperturbation analysis for the spin-orbit-coupleda 1Σ+ andb 3Π0+ states of lirb, Phys. Rev. A110, 042812 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Deng, X.-Y

    F. Deng, X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 183001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Silber, S

    C. Silber, S. G¨ unther, C. Marzok, B. Deh, Ph. W. Courteille, and C. Zimmermann, Quantum-Degenerate Mixture of Fermionic Lithium and Bosonic Rubidium Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 170408 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Taglieber, A.-C

    M. Taglieber, A.-C. Voigt, T. Aoki, T. W. H¨ ansch, and K. Dieckmann, Quantum Degenerate Two-Species Fermi- Fermi Mixture Coexisting with a Bose-Einstein Conden- sate, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 010401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    B. Deh, C. Marzok, C. Zimmermann, and Ph. W. Courteille, Feshbach resonances in mixtures of ultracold Li 6 and Rb 87 gases, Phys. Rev. A77, 010701 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    B. Deh, W. Gunton, B. G. Klappauf, Z. Li, M. Semczuk, J. Van Dongen, and K. W. Madison, Giant Feshbach reso- nances in Li 6 - Rb 85 mixtures, Phys. Rev. A82, 020701 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    W. D. Phillips and H. Metcalf, Laser Deceleration of an Atomic Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 596 (1982)

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    M. A. Joffe, W. Ketterle, A. Martin, and D. E. Pritchard, Transverse cooling and deflection of an atomic beam in- side a zeeman slower, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B10, 2257 (1993)

    work page 1993

  13. [13]

    Mewes, G

    M.-O. Mewes, G. Ferrari, F. Schreck, A. Sinatra, and C. Salomon, Simultaneous magneto-optical trapping of two lithium isotopes, Phys. Rev. A61, 011403 (1999)

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Hadzibabic, C

    Z. Hadzibabic, C. A. Stan, K. Dieckmann, S. Gupta, M. W. Zwierlein, A. G¨ orlitz, and W. Ketterle, Two- species mixture of quantum degenerate bose and fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 160401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Taglieber, A.-C

    M. Taglieber, A.-C. Voigt, F. Henkel, S. Fray, T. W. H¨ ansch, and K. Dieckmann, Simultaneous magneto- optical trapping of three atomic species, Physical Review A73, 011402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    G. E. Marti, R. Olf, E. Vogt, A. ¨Ottl, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Two-element zeeman slower for rubidium and lithium, Phys. Rev. A81, 043424 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Large atom number dual-species magneto-optical trap for fermionic 6Li and 40K atoms

    A. Ridinger, S. Chaudhuri, T. Salez, U. Eismann, D. R. Fernandes, D. Wilkowski, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, Large atom number dual-species magneto-optical trap for fermionic 6Li and 40K atoms, Eur. Phys. J. D65, 223 (2011), arXiv:1103.0637 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    J. W. Park, C.-H. Wu, I. Santiago, T. G. Tiecke, S. Will, P. Ahmadi, and M. W. Zwierlein, Quantum degener- ate bose-fermi mixture of chemically different atomic species with widely tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A 85, 051602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    S. A. Hopkins, K. Butler, A. Guttridge, S. Kemp, R. Freytag, E. A. Hinds, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cor- nish, A versatile dual-species Zeeman slower for caesium and ytterbium, Rev. Sci. Instrum.87, 043109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Wu, X.-C

    Y.-P. Wu, X.-C. Yao, H.-Z. Chen, X.-P. Liu, X.-Q. Wang, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, A quantum degenerate Bose– Fermi mixture of41 K and6 Li, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 094001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Ilzh¨ ofer, G

    P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Durastante, A. Patscheider, A. Traut- mann, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Two-species five- beam magneto-optical trap for erbium and dysprosium, Physical Review A97, 023633 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    X. Ma, Z. Ye, L. Xie, Z. Guo, L. You, and M. K. Tey, A dual-species magneto-optical trap for lithium and stron- tium atoms (2019), arXiv:1904.05230 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    R. G. Hulet, J. H. V. Nguyen, and R. Senaratne, Meth- ods for preparing quantum gases of lithium, Rev. Sci. Instrum.91, 011101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Warner, A

    C. Warner, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, H. C. Liu, I. Steven- son, and S. Will, Overlapping bose-einstein condensates of 23Na and 133Cs, Phys. Rev. A104, 033302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Vayninger, A

    M. Vayninger, A. Xiang, N. D. Bhanushali, X. Chen, M. Verma, S. Yang, R. T. Kapur, D. DeMille, and Z. Z. Yan, A magneto-optical trap of silver and potassium atoms (2025), arXiv:2507.11434 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Dieckmann, R

    K. Dieckmann, R. J. C. Spreeuw, M. Weidem¨ uller, and J. T. M. Walraven, Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms, Phys. Rev. A58, 3891 (1998)

    work page 1998

  27. [27]

    A. Z. Lam, C. Warner, N. Bigagli, S. Roschinski, W. Yuan, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Compact two- dimensional magneto-optical trap for ultracold atom se- tups (2021), arXiv:2012.06688 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Chen, W.-X

    Y.-D. Chen, W.-X. Li, M.-E. Chou, C.-H. Kuo, C.-S. Li, and S. Tung, Lithium-cesium slow beam from a two- dimensional magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. A103, 023102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    P¨ ur, M

    C. P¨ ur, M. Hetzel, M. Quensen, A. H¨ uper, J. Geng, J. Kruse, W. Ertmer, and C. Klempt, Rapid generation and number-resolved detection of spinor rubidium Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A107, 033303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Sutradhar, A

    S. Sutradhar, A. Misra, G. Pal, S. Majumder, S. Roy, and S. Chaudhuri, Fast loaded dual species magneto optical trap of cold sodium and potassium atoms with light-assisted inter-species interaction, AIP Advances13, 065317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    A. J. Matthies, J. M. Mortlock, L. A. McArd, A. P. 11 Raghuram, A. D. Innes, P. D. Gregory, S. L. Bromley, and S. L. Cornish, Long-distance optical-conveyor-belt transport of ultracold 133Cs and 87Rb atoms, Phys. Rev. A109, 023321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    T. G. Tiecke, S. D. Gensemer, A. Ludewig, and J. T. M. Walraven, A high-flux 2D MOT source for cold lithium atoms, Phys. Rev. A80, 013409 (2009), arXiv:0905.1063 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Hammel, M

    T. Hammel, M. Kaiser, D. Dux, P. M. Preiss, M. Wei- dem¨ uller, and S. Jochim, Modular quantum gas platform, Phys. Rev. A111, 033314 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    N. Jain, J. Zhang, M. Culemann, and P. M. Preiss, Pro- grammable assembly of ground state fermionic tweezer arrays (2025), arXiv:2512.09849 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Lamporesi, S

    G. Lamporesi, S. Donadello, S. Serafini, and G. Ferrari, Compact high-flux source of cold sodium atoms, Rev. Sci. Instrum.84, 063102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Li, Z.-L

    Z.-L. Li, Z.-L. Shi, and P.-J. Wang, Design and research of two-dimensional magneto-optical trap of sodium atom using permanent magnets, Acta Phys. Sin.69, 126701

    work page

  37. [37]

    Z. Li, Z. Gu, Z. Shi, P. Wang, and J. Zhang, Quantum degenerate bose-fermi atomic gas mixture of 23na and 40k, Chinese Physics B32, 023701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Nosske, L

    I. Nosske, L. Couturier, F. Hu, C. Tan, C. Qiao, J. Blume, Y. H. Jiang, P. Chen, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source for cold strontium atoms, Phys. Rev. A96, 053415 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Wodey, R

    E. Wodey, R. J. Rengelink, C. Meiners, E. M. Rasel, and D. Schlippert, A robust, high-flux source of laser-cooled ytterbium atoms, J. Phys. B54, 035301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Biswas, S

    S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, C. Buchberger, X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, M. Hani, E. Biebl, I. Bloch, and X.- Y. Luo, Generation of strong ultralow-phase-noise mi- crowave fields with tunable ellipticity for ultracold polar molecules (2025), arXiv:2512.03007 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    M. E. Gehm,Preparation of an Optically-Trapped Degen- erate Fermi Gas of 6Li: Finding the Route to Degener- acy, Ph.D. thesis (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Private communication with C. Gross

    work page

  43. [43]

    Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data (2025), avail- able online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.3.4, 8 August 2025)

    Daniel A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data (2025), avail- able online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.3.4, 8 August 2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Steck, Rubidium 85 D Line Data (2025), avail- able online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.3.4, 8 August 2025)

    Daniel A. Steck, Rubidium 85 D Line Data (2025), avail- able online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.3.4, 8 August 2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Das and V

    D. Das and V. Natarajan, Absolute frequency measure- ment of the lithium D lines: Precise determination of isotope shifts and fine-structure intervals, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052508 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Wei and S.-H

    C.-H. Wei and S.-H. Yan, Simple and robust method for rapid cooling of 87 Rb to quantum degeneracy*, Chinese Phys. B29, 064208 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    J. Ye, S. Swartz, P. Jungner, and J. L. Hall, Hyperfine structure and absolute frequency of the 87Rb 5P3/2 state, Opt. Lett., OL21, 1280 (1996)

    work page 1996

  48. [48]

    A. M. Steane, M. Chowdhury, and C. J. Foot, Radiation force in the magneto-optical trap, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B9, 2142 (1992)

    work page 1992

  49. [49]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. Swann, H. Robinson, and C. Wieman, Very cold trapped atoms in a vapor cell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1571 (1990)

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    T. P. Dinneen, K. R. Vogel, E. Arimondo, J. L. Hall, and A. Gallagher, Cold collisions of Sr * - Sr in a magneto- optical trap, Phys. Rev. A59, 1216 (1999)

    work page 1999

  51. [51]

    C. Chen, K. Liu, D. Deng, S. Ma, P. Zhu, Z. He, J. F. Che, X. Wu, and P. Chen, A Compact Dual- Beam Zeeman Slower for High-Flux Cold Atoms (2025), arXiv:2511.08193 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Tobias Hammel,Design and Construction of a New Ex- periment for Programmable Quantum Simulation Using Ultracold 6Li Fermions, Master’s thesis, Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg, Heidelberg (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    J¨ ollenbeck, J

    S. J¨ ollenbeck, J. Mahnke, R. Randoll, W. Ertmer, J. Arlt, and C. Klempt, Hexapole-compensated magneto-optical trap on a mesoscopic atom chip, Phys. Rev. A83, 043406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    H¨ oltkemeier,2D MOT as a Source of a Cold Atom Target, Diploma thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidel- berg (2011)

    B. H¨ oltkemeier,2D MOT as a Source of a Cold Atom Target, Diploma thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidel- berg (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Parry,Construction, and Performance towards A Versatile 87Rb & 41K BEC Apparatus, Master’s thesis, The University of Queensland (2015)

    M. Parry,Construction, and Performance towards A Versatile 87Rb & 41K BEC Apparatus, Master’s thesis, The University of Queensland (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    The maximum gradient is limited by the maximum num- ber of magnets that can fit in one stack (12). 12 Appendix A: Differential pumping channels design It is essential to carefully design the dimensions of the differential pumping channels (DP) between the cham- bers to maintain a sufficient pressure ratio while not blocking the atomic flux more than neces...

    work page

  57. [57]

    Numerical principle The core of the simulations for the Zeeman slower beam is the numerical integration of the equations of mo- tion obtained from the position and velocity-dependent radiation force acting on the atoms (cf. Eq. 3), us- ing the python packagescipy.intergrate version 1.15.0. The atoms’ starting position is the bottom of the oven, 190 mm awa...

    work page

  58. [58]

    A 2D scan of the gain over the saturation parameter S0 and detuningδ Li z,c (Fig

    Parameter scan for optimization To narrow down the number of variables in the pa- rameter scan and thereby reduce computational effort, certain parameters are investigated and fixed in advance. A 2D scan of the gain over the saturation parameter S0 and detuningδ Li z,c (Fig. 10a) verifies that higherS 0 leads to a higher possible gain, justifying working ...

    work page

  59. [59]

    Extended simulation results for final experimental parameters Based on the parameter scan, the magnet distance was fixed atl x = 70 mm, providing a good compromise between gain and convenience during setup installation. 14 0 40 80 S0 (a.u.) 100 80 60 40 20 Li z, c ( Li) Gain (a.u.) 20 40 60 80 100 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 z (m) 0 2 4v (×102 m/s) 2 0 2 B (...

    work page