Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Model Predictive Control-Based Optimal Energy Management of Autonomous Electric Vehicles Under Cold Temperatures

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A real-time MPC framework allocates battery energy among propulsion, cabin heating, and battery preconditioning so a cold autonomous EV can reach a charger with the battery ready to charge immediately.

desk verdict Integrated MPC for cold-weather AEV energy management is a real contribution, but the setpoint-as-control assumption makes the results unverified; worth a serious rewrite, not a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10221 v3 pith:25GC6ITT submitted 2025-06-11 eess.SY cs.SY

Shanthan Kumar Padisala , Satadru Dey This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords modelpredictivecontrolenergymanagementautonomouselectricvehiclesbatterypreconditioningcabinthermalcomfortstateofchargecoldtemperatureoperationpowersplit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When an autonomous electric vehicle runs low on charge in cold weather, cabin heating and battery preconditioning compete with propulsion for the same battery energy, and the usual fallback is to starve the thermal loads to protect range. This paper proposes a real-time model predictive controller that instead treats cabin comfort, battery health, and charging readiness as co-equal objectives within a single optimization horizon. The controller decides, at each time step, how much battery power goes to propulsion, to the HVAC heat pump, and to the battery heater, using lookahead road grade and ambient temperature from vehicle sensors. Two simulation case studies, one with synthetic and one with real road-grade data, show the vehicle arriving at the charging station with battery state of charge still above zero and battery temperature in the 313.15-315.15 K range needed for immediate charging. If correct, this is a step toward erasing range anxiety in cold climates by making thermal loads part of the trip plan rather than a threat to it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the receding-horizon MPC with cost $J=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\left[w_1 E_{\mathrm{HVAC}}(T_{\mathrm{CabinReq}}(k)) + w_2 E_{\mathrm{propulsion}}(F_{\mathrm{Propulsion}}(k)) + w_3 E_{\mathrm{heater}}(T_{\mathrm{BattSet}}(k))\right]$ over a horizon of $N$ steps. Instead of commanding compressor speed directly, the system-level controller treats cabin and battery temperature setpoints as control variables, and lower-level proportional controllers track them via compressor RPM and battery-heater current. This decouples the nonlinear refrigerant dynamics from the linear MPC, while HVAC energy is still estimated from the refrigeration-cycle enthalpy balance, so that propulsion, cabin heating, and battery preconditioning are all expressed in the same energy units and can be optimized jointly.

What would settle it

Add a hard cap on compressor speed and set the ambient temperature to, say, 250 K for both case studies, then re-run the closed loop; if the lower-level HVAC controller can no longer hold the cabin setpoint, the MPC's predicted HVAC energy is understated and the vehicle would arrive with the battery outside the 313.15-315.15 K charging window. A bench test with a real heat-pump compressor driving the same battery pack would give a definitive answer.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of this paper is that a linear, receding-horizon MPC can solve the AEV cold-weather energy management problem without sacrificing thermal comfort or battery health. The MPC's decision variables are the cabin temperature setpoint, the battery temperature setpoint, and the propulsion force; its states are state of charge, battery temperature, and vehicle speed. The cost function is the weighted sum of the HVAC compressor energy, the propulsion energy, and the battery-heater energy over a prediction horizon of N steps, with constraints on SoC, temperatures, and speed. Using refrigerant property lookup data for R134a, the compressor work is computed from the enthalpy rise between evaporator outlet and condenser outlet, so the MPC can trade off cabin heating against battery heating against propulsion in energy terms. The two case studies start the vehicle at 20% SoC and 293 K battery temperature in a roughly 268 K ambient, and both end with the battery heated into the 313.15-315.15 K charging window and the destination reached, with energy and speed profiles that respond to the road grade.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on the premise that the compressor or heat pump can always supply the heating capacity the MPC asks for, so cabin and battery temperatures will track their commanded setpoints; if that capacity is unavailable at very cold ambient temperatures or near compressor limits, the predicted energy split and the promised arrival conditions would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the MPC performs as demonstrated, an autonomous EV at low state of charge can plan heating and battery preconditioning jointly with propulsion, removing the need to choose between range and comfort.
  • Changing the weights $w_1, w_2, w_3$ re-tunes the trade-off: heavier thermal weights keep the cabin and battery warmer at the cost of range, while heavier propulsion weights preserve speed at the cost of thermal readiness.
  • The setpoint-based architecture extends naturally to HVAC cooling mode and to building HVAC systems, since the cost structure separates the thermal plants from the vehicle dynamics.
  • Because the MPC uses only measurements available from cameras, GPS, inertial units, and temperature sensors, it fits within an autonomous vehicle's existing perception stack.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two case studies cover a 600-second trip; a longer trip or a colder ambient would stress the assumption that the compressor can always meet the setpoint, since the MPC does not model compressor saturation.
  • The benefit of the lookahead grade data scales with the quality of the grade and ambient forecast: errors in those inputs would translate directly into suboptimal power splits, suggesting a robust or stochastic extension would be a natural next step.
  • Injecting a hard compressor-speed limit into the simulation is the most direct test of the setpoint assumption; if tracking fails, the controller would need a more detailed HVAC model to preserve its claims.
  • The battery-heater model uses a proportional controller on heater current with no current limit; a real vehicle would need to account for that limit and internal thermal gradients before the approach can be deployed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a model predictive control (MPC) strategy for autonomous electric vehicles (AEVs) operating at low state of charge and cold ambient temperatures. The MPC is designed to split battery energy among propulsion, cabin HVAC heating, and battery preconditioning so that the vehicle reaches a charging station with the battery at a temperature suitable for immediate charging. The authors model the vehicle longitudinal dynamics, a simplified cabin thermal model, a heat-pump HVAC system using CoolProp refrigerant properties, and a first-order equivalent-circuit battery model with thermal dynamics. The system-level MPC commands propulsion force and cabin/battery temperature setpoints; lower-level controllers track these setpoints. Two simulation case studies are presented: one with synthetic sinusoidal road grade and ambient temperature, and one with real-world road grade data from the High Peaks Scenic Byway. The results show the vehicle reaching the destination with the battery temperature near the desired 313.15–315.15 K range while maintaining cabin comfort.

Significance. If the proposed framework were validated against baselines and shown to be robust to actuator limitations, it would address a practically important problem in AEV energy management: the joint optimization of propulsion, cabin heating, and battery preconditioning under low-SoC, cold-weather conditions. The paper's use of an open-source refrigerant library (CoolProp), real-world road grade data, and a clearly stated system architecture are strengths, and the manuscript is generally clearly written. However, the core claim of 'optimal' and 'energy-efficient' energy allocation is currently supported only by trajectories produced by the controller's own cost function, without any baseline comparison or sensitivity analysis, and the feasibility of the temperature-setpoint control assumption is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (13)-(16)]
  2. [Section V, no baseline comparison]
  3. [Section IV and Eq. (13)]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (13)]
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (14)]
  3. [Section III-D, Eq. (10) and Table I]
  4. [Section V, Fig. 4 and Fig. 9]
  5. [Section V-A, Fig. 6]
  6. [Section IV]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MPC trajectories are a self-contained closed-loop simulation of the authors' own cost, and the HVAC setpoint assumption is a fidelity limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the paper's derivation chain: subsystem models are assembled from external sources (CoolProp for refrigerant properties; references [22]-[28] for propulsion, cabin, HVAC, and battery dynamics; RPT-identified cell parameters from [31]); an MPC is then posed with a weighted energy cost and SoC/temperature constraints; and the reported plots are closed-loop simulations of that same MPC. No quantity that is later called a prediction is fitted to the reported outputs: the weights w1-w3 are not tuned to reproduce the trajectories, the battery parameters are presented as RPT measurements, and the cited prior work by the same authors ([7], [17], [31], [37], [38]) supplies background or parameter values rather than a uniqueness argument or a forced ansatz. The one load-bearing simplification, 'assuming that the compressor or heat pump has the ability to provide the heating capacity to achieve the requested temperatures' (Section IV), is an acknowledged model-fidelity gap: without compressor saturation or lower-level tracking limits, the simulated cabin and battery setpoint tracking and the associated energy split may not transfer to hardware. That is a correctness and realism risk, not a circular step, because the plant in the simulation is governed by the same simplified model and the paper makes no claim of independent experimental validation. Accordingly, no step reduces by construction to its input, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on simplified lumped-parameter models and several hand-set assumptions (refrigerant temperature offsets, perfect look-ahead, achievable setpoints), plus unreported tuning parameters (cost weights, horizon, sampling time, gains). These choices determine the simulation outcomes.

free parameters (5)
  • w1, w2, w3 (MPC cost weights) = not reported
    Weight the HVAC, propulsion, and battery heater energies in Eq. (13). The entire optimal split depends on these values; no tuning method or sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Prediction horizon N = not reported
    Number of steps in the MPC moving horizon. Affects look-ahead performance and computational cost; omitted from Section IV.
  • Sampling time dt = not reported
    Controller update period used to discretize the dynamics. Not specified anywhere in the paper.
  • Proportional gains K_b and K_h = not reported
    Gains for the battery temperature and cabin temperature lower-level controllers in Eqs. (11)-(12). Their values affect tracking of the MPC setpoints.
  • Constraint bounds (SoC_min/max, T_Batt_min/max, v_min/max, F_min/max, T_set_min/max) = not reported
    Inequality constraints in Eqs. (15)-(16) shape the feasible region; numerical values are not given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cabin air is a well-mixed volume with uniform temperature; heat loss through the cabin surface is linear in the cabin-ambient temperature difference.
    Used in Eq. (3); no validation against experimental cabin data is provided, and the linear loss model omits radiation and solar loads.
  • ad hoc to paper The heat pump/compressor can realize any requested cabin and battery temperature setpoint within the MPC bounds.
    Section IV states this assumption explicitly, enabling a linear MPC with temperature setpoints as controls; it bypasses the nonlinear compressor model and any actuation limits.
  • domain assumption Refrigerant State 1 is approximately 5 K below ambient and State 3 is 5-10 K above the target air inlet temperature, with isobaric condensation and isentropic compression.
    Section III-C uses these fixed offsets to compute compressor work from saturation properties; no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • domain assumption Future road grade and ambient temperature are known exactly over the MPC prediction horizon.
    The MPC uses look-ahead sensor information (Section IV); the paper does not model estimation error or uncertainty in these forecasts.
  • domain assumption Battery equivalent circuit and thermal parameters from prior work (Refs. [27], [31]) are representative of the simulated cell.
    Identified parameters for a 4.2-2.5 V, 4 Ah cell are scaled to a 100S56P pack; no uncertainty or pack-level thermal coupling is modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Model Predictive Control-Based Optimal Energy Management of Autonomous Electric Vehicles Under Cold Temperatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25GC6ITT

@misc{pith2026250610221,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Model Predictive Control-Based Optimal Energy Management of Autonomous Electric Vehicles Under Cold Temperatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25GC6ITT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10221}
}
read the original abstract

In autonomous electric vehicles (AEVs), battery energy must be judiciously allocated to satisfy primary propulsion demands and secondary auxiliary demands, particularly the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system. This becomes especially critical when the battery is in a low state of charge under cold ambient conditions, and cabin heating and battery preconditioning (prior to actual charging) can consume a significant percentage of available energy, directly impacting the driving range. In such cases, one usually prioritizes propulsion or applies heuristic rules for thermal management, often resulting in suboptimal energy utilization. There is a pressing need for a principled approach that can dynamically allocate battery power in a way that balances thermal comfort, battery health and preconditioning, along with range preservation. This paper attempts to address this issue using real-time Model Predictive Control to optimize the power consumption between the propulsion, HVAC, and battery temperature preparation so that it can be charged immediately once the destination is reached.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10221 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example architecture of Autonomous Electric Vehicle (AEV). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic of the HVAC architecture. The energy balance equation is given by [26]: WCompressor = ˙mf (h2 − h1), (4) where m˙ f = Vcompηcompflow ωcompρref 2π/60 , WCompressor is the work done by the compressor in J/s, m˙ f is the refrigerant flow in kg/s, and h1 and h2 are the enthalpies of the refrigerant entering and exiting the compressor in J/kg. Vcomp is the volume rate of refrigerant pumped in m3/s, ηcompflow… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Refrigeration Cycle Illustration in the P-H diagram, adopted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ambient temperature and road grade profiles used for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Energy consumption of the individual subsystems under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Battery, air inlet and cabin temperature response under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ambient temperature and road grade profiles used for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Battery, air inlet and cabin temperature response under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Vehicle velocity response under Case Study 2, as dictated by the proposed MPC-based scheme. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time [s] 65 65.5 66 66.5 67 Vehicle Speed [mph] Vehicle Speed Speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Vehicle velocity response under Case Study 2, as dictated by the proposed MPC-based scheme. VI. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK Range anxiety is one of the critical challenges affecting the smoother transition of EV adoption. Therefore, every mile increment in the range is…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy-saving optimization and control of autonomous electric vehicles with consider- ing multiconstraints,

    Y . Zhang, Z. Ai, J. Chen, T. You, C. Du, and L. Deng, “Energy-saving optimization and control of autonomous electric vehicles with consider- ing multiconstraints,”IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 10 869–10 881, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Chapter 1 - introduction to autonomous vehicles,

    H. Faghihian, J. Holland, and A. Sargolzaei, “Chapter 1 - introduction to autonomous vehicles,” inHandbook of Power Electronics in Autonomous and Electric V ehicles, M. H. Rashid, Ed. Academic Press, 2024, pp. 1–16. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978032399545000018X

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    A review of optimal energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicle,

    A. Panday and H. O. Bansal, “A review of optimal energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicle,”International Journal of V ehicular Technology, vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 160510, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Onori, L

    S. Onori, L. Serrao, and G. Rizzoni,Hybrid electric vehicles: Energy management strategies. Springer, 2016, vol. 13

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles,

    S. F. Tie and C. W. Tan, “A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles,”Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 20, pp. 82–102, 2013. 10

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    A review of recent research on automotive hvac systems for evs,

    B. H. Kang and H. J. Lee, “A review of recent research on automotive hvac systems for evs,”International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, vol. 25, no. 04, p. 1730003, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Online detection and identification of cathode cracking in lithium-ion battery cells,

    S. K. Padisala, S. Sattarzadeh, and S. Dey, “Online detection and identification of cathode cracking in lithium-ion battery cells,”Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 95, p. 112441, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X24020279

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    An optimal energy management system for battery electric vehicles,

    B. Sakhdari and N. Azad, “An optimal energy management system for battery electric vehicles,”IF AC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 86– 92, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Control trajectory optimisation and optimal control of an electric vehicle hvac system for favourable efficiency and thermal comfort,

    I. Cvok, B. ˇSkugor, and J. Deur, “Control trajectory optimisation and optimal control of an electric vehicle hvac system for favourable efficiency and thermal comfort,”Optimization and Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Optimal management of thermal comfort and driving range in electric vehicles,

    A. Lahlou, F. Ossart, E. Boudard, F. Roy, and M. Bakhouya, “Optimal management of thermal comfort and driving range in electric vehicles,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 4471, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Energy management system in battery electric vehicle based on fuzzy logic control to optimize the energy consumption in hvac system,

    A. A. Abulifa, A. C. Soh, M. K. Hassan, R. M. K. R. Ahmad, and M. A. M. Radzi, “Energy management system in battery electric vehicle based on fuzzy logic control to optimize the energy consumption in hvac system,”International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    A-ecms: An adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management,

    C. Musardo, G. Rizzoni, Y . Guezennec, and B. Staccia, “A-ecms: An adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management,” European journal of control, vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 509–524, 2005

    2005

  5. [13]

    Mpc-based real-time energy management of freight hybrid locomotives **this research was supported by the u.s. department of energy through arpae grant number 148068

    N. Ahuja, K. Bhaskar, J. D. Martin, C. D. Rahn, and H. C. Pangborn, “Mpc-based real-time energy management of freight hybrid locomotives **this research was supported by the u.s. department of energy through arpae grant number 148068.”IF AC- PapersOnLine, vol. 58, no. 28, pp. ...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Model predictive climate control of electric vehicles for improved battery lifetime,

    D. Rong, B. Yang, and C. Chen, “Model predictive climate control of electric vehicles for improved battery lifetime,” in2019 Chinese automation congress (CAC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 5457–5462

    2019

  7. [15]

    An improved intelligent model predictive controller for cooling system of electric vehicle,

    Y . Xie, Z. Liu, K. Li, J. Liu, Y . Zhang, D. Dan, C. Wu, P. Wang, and X. Wang, “An improved intelligent model predictive controller for cooling system of electric vehicle,”Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 182, p. 116084, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Model predictive control of hvac system in a battery electric vehicle with fan power adaptation for improved efficiency and online estimation of ambient temperature,

    M. Alizadeh, S. Dhale, and A. Emadi, “Model predictive control of hvac system in a battery electric vehicle with fan power adaptation for improved efficiency and online estimation of ambient temperature,” in IECON 2021–47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics ...

    2021

  9. [17]

    Feedback-based fault-tolerant and health-adaptive optimal charging of batteries,

    S. Sattarzadeh, S. K. Padisala, Y . Shi, P. P. Mishra, K. Smith, and S. Dey, “Feedback-based fault-tolerant and health-adaptive optimal charging of batteries,”Applied Energy, vol. 343, p. 121187, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Batteries, battery management, and battery charging technology,

    R. S. Balog and A. Davoudi, “Batteries, battery management, and battery charging technology,” inElectric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell V ehicles. Springer, 2021, pp. 315–352

    2021

  11. [19]

    Battery charging technologies and standards for electric vehicles: A state-of-the-art review, challenges, and future research prospects,

    M. T. Shahed and A. H.-u. Rashid, “Battery charging technologies and standards for electric vehicles: A state-of-the-art review, challenges, and future research prospects,”Energy Reports, vol. 11, pp. 5978–5998, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Research on the battery charging strategy with charging and temperature rising control awareness,

    M. Ye, H. Gong, R. Xiong, and H. Mu, “Research on the battery charging strategy with charging and temperature rising control awareness,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 64 193–64 201, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on optimal charging methods of lithium ion batteries,

    Q. Lin, J. Wang, R. Xiong, W. Shen, and H. He, “Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on optimal charging methods of lithium ion batteries,” Energy, vol. 183, pp. 220–234, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03...

    2019

  14. [22]

    A vehicle longitudinal dynamical model for propulsion system tailoring,

    T. Ghandriz and B. J. Jacobson, “A vehicle longitudinal dynamical model for propulsion system tailoring,”Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Report, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/reader/304702920

    2020

  15. [23]

    Transient thermal model of a vehicle’s cabin validated under variable ambient conditions,

    B. Torregrosa-Jaime, F. Bjurling, J. M. Corber ´an, F. Di Sciullo, and J. Pay ´a, “Transient thermal model of a vehicle’s cabin validated under variable ambient conditions,”Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 45–53, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Advances on air conditioning and heat pump system in electric vehicles–a review,

    Z. Qi, “Advances on air conditioning and heat pump system in electric vehicles–a review,”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 38, pp. 754–764, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Optimal operation of refrigeration cycles,

    J. B. Jensen, “Optimal operation of refrigeration cycles,”PhD Thesis, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Power and thermal management with bat- tery degradation for hybrid electric vehicles,

    S. Park and H. C. Pangborn, “Power and thermal management with bat- tery degradation for hybrid electric vehicles,” in2021 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 832–838

    2021

  19. [27]

    A systematic review of lumped- parameter equivalent circuit models for real-time estimation of lithium- ion battery states,

    S. Nejad, D. Gladwin, and D. Stone, “A systematic review of lumped- parameter equivalent circuit models for real-time estimation of lithium- ion battery states,”Journal of Power Sources, vol. 316, pp. 183–196, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Single-particle model for a lithium-ion cell: Thermal behavior,

    M. Guo, G. Sikha, and R. E. White, “Single-particle model for a lithium-ion cell: Thermal behavior,”Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 158, no. 2, p. A122, dec 2010. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.3521314

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    Pure and pseudo- pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library coolprop,

    I. H. Bell, J. Wronski, S. Quoilin, and V . Lemort, “Pure and pseudo- pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library coolprop,”Industrial & engineering chemistry research, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2498–2508, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in mat- lab,

    J. Lofberg, “Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in mat- lab,” in2004 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37508). IEEE, 2004, pp. 284–289

    2004

  23. [31]

    Exploring adversarial threat models in cyber physical battery systems,

    S. K. Padisala, S. D. Vyas, and S. Dey, “Exploring adversarial threat models in cyber physical battery systems,”IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics, pp. 1–11, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Batteries and battery management systems for electric vehicles,

    M. Brandl, H. Gall, M. Wenger, V . Lorentz, M. Giegerich, F. Baronti, G. Fantechi, L. Fanucci, R. Roncella, R. Saletti, S. Saponara, A. Thaler, M. Cifrain, and W. Prochazka, “Batteries and battery management systems for electric vehicles,” in2012 Design, Automation & Test in E...

    2012

  25. [33]

    Xu and Z

    B. Xu and Z. Arjmandzadeh, “Parametric study on thermal management system for the range of full (tesla model s)/compact-size (tesla model

  26. [34]

    electric vehicles,”Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 278, p. 116753, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Quantifying the state of the art of electric powertrains in battery electric vehicles: Comprehensive analysis of the tesla model 3 on the vehicle level,

    N. Rosenberger, P. Rosner, P. Bilfinger, J. Sch ¨oberl, O. Teichert, J. Schneider, K. Abo Gamra, C. Allg ¨auer, B. Dietermann, M. Schreiber et al., “Quantifying the state of the art of electric powertrains in battery electric vehicles: Comprehensive analysis of the tesla model...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org ,

    OpenStreetMap contributors, “Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org ,” https://www.openstreetmap.org , 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Shuttle radar topography mission (srtm) global,

    NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), “Shuttle radar topography mission (srtm) global,” Distributed by OpenTopography, 2013, accessed: 2025-05-20. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5069/G9445JDF

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    Development of frameworks for environment dependent traffic simulation and adas algorithm testing,

    S. K. Padisala, “Development of frameworks for environment dependent traffic simulation and adas algorithm testing,” Master’s thesis, The Ohio State University, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Environmental traffic modeling and simulation sil toolset for electrified vehicles,

    S. K. Padisala and B. Yurkovich, “Environmental traffic modeling and simulation sil toolset for electrified vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper, Tech. Rep., 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Assessing geographical and seasonal influences on energy efficiency of electric drayage trucks,

    A. Shiledar, M. Villani, J. N. Lucero, R. Sun, V . A. Sujan, S. Onori, and G. Rizzoni, “Assessing geographical and seasonal influences on energy efficiency of electric drayage trucks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02575, 2025. Shanthan Kumar Padisalareceived B.E. in Man- ufacturin...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.