Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Towards the Autonomous Optimization of Urban Logistics: Training Generative AI with Scientific Tools via Agentic Digital Twins and Model Context Protocol

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A language model can orchestrate Gurobi and mapping tools to solve a freight routing request on its own.

desk verdict A plausible MCP-orchestrated freight digital twin that needs a written optimization model and an error-rate evaluation before the 'autonomous' claim carries weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13068 v2 pith:25MQV3WY submitted 2025-06-16 cs.MA

Haowen Xu , Yulin Sun , Jose Tupayachi , Olufemi Omitaomu , Sisi Zlatanova , Xueping Li This is my paper
classification cs.MA
keywords urbanlogisticsdigitaltwinsgenerativeAIModelContextProtocolmulti-agentsystemsretrieval-augmentedgenerationintermodalfreightoptimizationautonomousworkfloworchestration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Urban freight optimization usually requires an expert to translate a business question into a mathematical model, feed it to a solver, and interpret the output. This paper claims that a fine-tuned large language model, connected to scientific tools through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), can do that translation and execution end-to-end from a natural-language request. The system is demonstrated on a freight decarbonization case study: a user asks to move 250 containers from Seattle to Orlando within 36 hours, and the agents orchestrate Gurobi to produce an optimal intermodal route at $75,668.53, solved in under 0.06 seconds. The broader claim is that this architecture turns digital twins from static visualizations into autonomous decision-making systems, lowering the technical barrier for planners without operations-research expertise.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as an integration layer: every scientific tool — Gurobi, the freight simulation/route service, the data retrieval service, the map visualization service — is exposed as an MCP server with a RESTful API schema, and the fine-tuned LLM acts as the MCP client that generates HTTP requests matching those schemas. Around this protocol, the system adds a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline with a Neo4j knowledge graph built from freight literature, software manuals, and dataset documentation, so the LLM can identify which dataset, model, and tool to use. The LLM is fine-tuned with QLoRA on templated dialogues with chain-of-thought prompting so it can parse user intents, generate valid API payloads, and convert solver logs back into plain language. The demonstration route (14 nodes, 250 containers, truck and rail modes) is the proof-of-concept instance that exercises this entire chain without manual intervention.

What would settle it

Present the system with a set of unseen natural-language freight queries that deliberately vary phrasing, add implicit constraints, or combine multiple objectives, and count how many run end-to-end without human intervention. If a substantial fraction fail because the LLM generates an invalid HTTP payload or selects the wrong tool, the claimed autonomy is not yet established. A second check is to scale the network beyond the 14-node instance and observe whether the exact MILP solve time and end-to-end latency remain within interactive bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a digital twin for intermodal freight logistics can be made 'agentic': a knowledge-augmented LLM parses the user's natural-language goal, retrieves relevant datasets and methods from a structured knowledge base, plans a task workflow, and invokes domain tools by generating HTTP requests to MCP servers that wrap each tool as an API. In the demonstrated use case, the LLM, acting as an MCP client, selects the freight network data, configures the optimization problem, calls the Gurobi solver, and then translates the solver log into a plain-language explanation with a route map served through GeoServer. The authors present the Seattle-to-Orlando result with total cost $75,668.53, operational cost $45,065.13, GHG tax $29,371.77, solved optimally in under 0.06 seconds, as evidence that the orchestration works. The stated significance is that the same modular, protocol-based design can be extended to other scientific tools and urban problems, making decision support accessible to users without programming or optimization expertise.

Load-bearing premise

The framework's autonomy rests on the assumption that the fine-tuned language model will turn a user's natural-language request into a correct, valid HTTP request to the right MCP server; the paper reports no measurement of how often that mapping succeeds for unusual or ambiguous requests.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user without optimization expertise can obtain a solver-verified intermodal freight plan by typing a plain-English request, because the system handles model selection, data retrieval, and solver invocation.
  • Digital twins built this way become executable decision systems, because the same MCP wiring that renders a route map can also trigger optimization and simulation rather than stopping at visualization.
  • Adding a new scientific tool to the system reduces to wrapping it as an MCP server with a documented API schema, making the architecture modular and extensible across urban logistics toolchains.
  • The demonstrated pipeline completes end-to-end in under 15 seconds, which makes conversational, simulation-informed logistics planning practical for interactive use rather than batch analysis.
  • If the approach scales, the same protocol-based orchestration can be applied to other urban operations problems, such as energy, water, and traffic, wherever specialized solvers exist behind APIs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the reported 0.06-second solve is the Gurobi computation time on a small 14-node instance, so it should not be read as evidence that the architecture scales to metropolitan networks of thousands of nodes; the paper itself flags this limitation.
  • Editorial inference: the central risk is the LLM's natural-language-to-HTTP mapping, for which no error rate is reported; a reader should expect that off-template queries will need human fallback or validation hooks until that mapping is measured.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension would be to deploy the same MCP wrapper pattern for other solvers, such as CPLEX or SCIP, and compare the generated payloads to see whether the fine-tuning generalizes across API dialects.
  • Editorial inference: the framework's autonomy is demonstrated on one scripted-sounding dialogue, so a stronger demonstration would run dozens of varied phrasings and measure how many complete without human intervention.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an agentic digital twin framework for urban freight logistics that combines large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, structured knowledge graphs, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to orchestrate scientific tools such as Gurobi and AnyLogic. It describes two workflows (knowledge ingestion and decision support), reports a demonstration in which a chatbot interprets a natural-language request to send 250 containers from Seattle to Orlando within 36 hours, and claims that the system autonomously selected tools, solved the underlying optimization problem optimally in 0.06 seconds at a total cost of $75,668.53, and visualized the route. The central claim is that MCP-based orchestration transforms digital twins from static visualizations into autonomous, decision-capable systems.

Significance. If the architecture were shown to reliably map arbitrary natural-language requests to valid tool invocations and to produce correct, reproducible optimization results, it would be a useful step toward lowering the barrier to using scientific solvers and simulators in logistics planning. The paper is timely in its adoption of MCP, and it integrates several nontrivial components (fine-tuned LLMs, RAG, Neo4j knowledge graphs, GeoServer visualization, and containerized MCP servers). It also publishes a portion of the FAF dataset. However, the current evidence base is a single templated 14-node demonstration with no evaluation of the LLM-to-MCP request mapping, no specification of the optimization model, and no measurement methodology for the reported performance numbers. These gaps are load-bearing for the 'autonomous' and 'decision-capable' claims, so the contribution is not yet established at the level claimed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.5 vs. Section 3.6] There is a direct contradiction about which component invokes external tools. Section 3.5 states that the LLM 'operates solely as a domain-aware planner and workflow generator' and 'does not directly invoke external APIs or execute simulations,' while Section 3.6 states that the LLM is API-competent and 'generate[s] complete HTTP requests—including proper parameterization and payload construction—for invoking scientific tools hosted as MCP services.' This is load-bearing because the paper's autonomy claim depends on who actually issues the HTTP calls. Please clarify the exact control flow: if the LLM only produces a plan and a separate executor issues requests, describe that executor and its reliability; if the LLM does issue requests, reconcile the Section 3.5 statement.
  2. [Sections 4.2 and 4.3] The claim that the Seattle-to-Orlando problem was 'solved optimally' cannot be verified because no mathematical optimization model is specified. The paper does not define the decision variables, objective function coefficients (e.g., per-mode costs and GHG tax rates), constraints (e.g., time windows, container capacity, network topology), or the actual dataset used. Without this information, the reported total cost of $75,668.53 and the optimality assertion are not reproducible. Please provide the complete MILP formulation, the input data (or a public link to it), solver version, hardware, and the method used to measure the 0.06-second solve time, including whether this is a single run or an average over multiple runs.
  3. [Section 3.6] The central claim of autonomous orchestration rests on the fine-tuned LLM's ability to translate natural-language user requests into valid HTTP requests that conform to each MCP service's API templates, yet no evaluation of this mapping is reported. The only demonstration uses a single, pre-defined templated request ('send 250 containers from Seattle to Orlando within 36 hours'), which is compatible with a scripted pipeline. The paper's own Section 5 acknowledges that 'misinterpretation of ambiguous queries... may result in suboptimal tool selection or workflow planning.' Please add a systematic evaluation with a varied query set that includes off-template, ambiguous, and multi-intent inputs, and report metrics for correct MCP server selection, payload validity, and end-to-end task completion rate. Without such measurements, the 'autonomous' property is unsubstantiated.
  4. [Section 4.3] The performance claims—1.2-second average RAG response, end-to-end workflow under 15 seconds, and response times below 3 seconds for up to 50 concurrent optimization requests—are reported without any experimental methodology. The paper does not state the hardware, software versions, number of repetitions, the load-testing tool, the problem size used in the concurrency test, or any measure of statistical dispersion. These numbers cannot be reproduced or assessed. Please provide a description of the test environment, the workload configuration, and the raw results (e.g., mean, median, and percentiles over multiple runs).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.3] Calling a 14-node instance a 'notorious NP-hard problem' is an overstatement; NP-hardness of the general problem class does not imply that a particular small instance is hard to solve. Please rephrase to avoid implying that the size of this instance is computationally challenging.
  2. [Section 3.4] The knowledge-base construction section mentions benchmarking cosine similarity against Jaccard similarity, Euclidean distance, and word embeddings, but no results of this benchmark are presented. Please either report the comparison or remove the claim.
  3. [Section 3.6] There is a typo in the first sentence: 'digitsal' should be 'digital.'
  4. [Figure 4] The example WMS query contains a duplicated CQL_FILTER parameter with the same route_id value twice; this appears to be a copy-and-paste error and should be corrected.
  5. [Section 4.1] The paper states that user-uploaded PDFs are processed with Sentence Transformer models to extract entities and relationships, but it does not describe how entity extraction is performed (e.g., which model, whether it is prompted or fine-tuned). A brief clarification would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Seattle-Orlando demo runs real Gurobi and GeoServer calls, and the self-citations support a peripheral RAG component; the main weakness is an unmeasured generalization gap, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper is a systems-architecture demonstration rather than a derivation of a quantitative prediction. The central demonstration in Section 4.2 executes a real Gurobi solve on a 14-node multimodal network and renders the result through GeoServer; the reported cost, route, and solve time are outputs of an external solver, not quantities defined by the LLM's training templates, so they are not circular. The closest concern is that the fine-tuned LLM was trained on templated dialogues and API payload templates (Section 3.3, Section 3.6), and the single end-to-end demo in Section 4.2 uses a natural-language request, 'send 250 containers from Seattle to Orlando within 36 hours,' that instantiates the same template pattern; however, the paper frames this as a feasibility demonstration rather than as a fitted prediction, and the authors explicitly acknowledge the generalization risk in Section 5: 'Misinterpretation of ambiguous queries, incomplete specification of constraints, or over-reliance on pre-trained embeddings may result in suboptimal tool selection or workflow planning.' That is an unmeasured generalization limitation, not a reduction by construction. The knowledge-base rationale is partly justified by self-citation in Section 3.2: 'The rationale of the process have been proved by our previous studies (Xu et al., 2024a; Tupayachi et al., 2024),' but this supports a peripheral RAG/knowledge-graph component, is not used to forbid alternative approaches, and does not force the central MCP-orchestration result. No uniqueness theorem is imported, no known result is merely renamed, and the central architectural claim retains independent content. Overall, no load-bearing circularity is present; the score of 2 reflects only the minor self-referential support for the RAG pipeline.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The system's autonomy rests on several undisclosed assumptions: the reliability of the fine-tuned LLM's API-call generation, the sufficiency of the knowledge graph for tool selection, and the representativeness of the FAF-based case-study data. No free parameters are fitted because no quantitative model is specified.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The fine-tuned LLM, trained on templated dialogues and API templates, reliably translates arbitrary natural-language logistics requests into valid, executable MCP/HTTP calls to domain tools.
    Section 3.6 states the LLM is fine-tuned using API templates so it can generate conforming HTTP requests; the whole autonomous workflow depends on this.
  • domain assumption The knowledge graph built from academic papers, manuals, and datasets contains sufficient information to select correct methods and tools for unseen user scenarios.
    Section 3.4 describes the RAG-based knowledge base; the success of solution generation rests on it.
  • standard math Gurobi's reported optimality on the small MILP instances is trusted, and the FAF-based network data is an adequate representation of the real corridor.
    Section 4.2 and 4.3 rely on Gurobi solving to optimality; no formulation or data-cleaning details are provided to check this.
  • domain assumption The reported performance numbers (0.06 s solve, 1.2 s RAG, under 15 s end-to-end, under 3 s for 50 users) are measured in a reproducible environment.
    Section 4.3 presents these numbers without experimental setup, hardware, or error bars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards the Autonomous Optimization of Urban Logistics: Training Generative AI with Scientific Tools via Agentic Digital Twins and Model Context Protocol." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25MQV3WY

@misc{pith2026250613068,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards the Autonomous Optimization of Urban Logistics: Training Generative AI with Scientific Tools via Agentic Digital Twins and Model Context Protocol},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25MQV3WY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13068}
}
read the original abstract

Optimizing urban freight logistics is critical for developing sustainable, low-carbon cities. Traditional methods often rely on manual coordination of simulation tools, optimization solvers, and expert-driven workflows, limiting their efficiency and scalability. This paper presents an agentic system architecture that leverages the model context protocol (MCP) to orchestrate multi-agent collaboration among scientific tools for autonomous, simulation-informed optimization in urban logistics. The system integrates generative AI agents with domain-specific engines - such as Gurobi for optimization and AnyLogic for agent-based simulation - forming a generative digital twin capable of reasoning, planning, and acting across multimodal freight networks. By incorporating integrated chatbots, retrieval-augmented generation, and structured memory, the framework enables agents to interpret user intent from natural language conversations, retrieve relevant datasets and models, coordinate solvers and simulators, and execute complex workflows. We demonstrate this approach through a freight decarbonization case study, showcasing how MCP enables modular, interoperable, and adaptive agent behavior across diverse toolchains. The results reveal that our system transforms digital twins from static visualizations into autonomous, decision-capable systems, advancing the frontiers of urban operations research. By enabling context-aware, generative agents to operate scientific tools automatically and collaboratively, this framework supports more intelligent, accessible, and dynamic decision-making in transportation planning and smart city management.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13068 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of a Large Language Model (LLM)-Driven Agentic Digital Twin Framework [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The concept of building an agentic digital twin for optimizing integrated freight transpi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The technical framework for developing incorporating foundation models to enhance digi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exemplified WMS query including OpenStreetMap, FAF data, and simulation-selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A prototyping interface of the proposed foundation model developed using open-source [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A demonstration of the prototype’s learning and knowledge extraction capabilities, show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A demonstration of the chatbot providing specialized AI assistance to help digital twin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative AI as a Pillar for Predicting 2D and 3D Wildfire Spread: Beyond Physics-Based Models and Traditional Deep Learning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of eleven generative-AI wildfire studies finds promising accuracy and speed gains, but several counted models are not actually generative and none yet unifies 2D and 3D prediction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Al Najjar, A., Anantharaj, V., Asthagiri, D., Badalassi, V., Balaprakash, P., Beck, T., Brewer, W., Cabrera, A., Cheng, J., De, D., et al. (2024). Oak ridge national laboratory's strategic research and development insights for digital twins. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Aljadiri, R., Sundarakani, B., and El Barachi, M. (2023). Evaluating the impact of covid-19 on multimodal cargo transport performance: A mixed-method study in the uae context. Sustainability , 15(22):15703

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Ambra, T., Caris, A., and Macharis, C. (2019a). The digital twin concept and its role in reducing uncertainty in synchromodal transport. Proceedings of the IPIC

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ambra, T., Caris, A., and Macharis, C. (2019b). Towards freight transport system unification: reviewing and combining the advancements in the physical internet and synchromodal transport research. International Journal of Production Research , 57(6):1606--1623

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    and Macharis, C

    Ambra, T. and Macharis, C. (2020). Agent-based digital twins (abm-dt) in synchromodal transport and logistics: The fusion of virtual and pysical spaces. In 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) , pages 159--169. IEEE

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Archetti, C., Peirano, L., and Speranza, M. G. (2022). Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research , 299(1):1--20

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M

    Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    C., Poschmann, P., Werner, J., and Zarnitz, S

    Busse, A., Gerlach, B., Lengeling, J. C., Poschmann, P., Werner, J., and Zarnitz, S. (2021). Towards digital twins of multimodal supply chains. Logistics , 5(2):25

    work page 2021

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, Z., Xu, L., Zheng, H., Chen, L., Tolba, A., Zhao, L., Yu, K., and Feng, H. (2024). Evolution and prospects of foundation models: From large language models to large multimodal models. Computers, Materials & Continua , 80(2)

    2024

  2. [10]

    L., Jain, R., Emami, P., Wadsack, K., Ding, F., Sun, H., Gruchalla, K., Hong, J., Zhang, H., Zhu, X., and Kroposki, B

    Choi, S. L., Jain, R., Emami, P., Wadsack, K., Ding, F., Sun, H., Gruchalla, K., Hong, J., Zhang, H., Zhu, X., and Kroposki, B. (2024). egridgpt: Trustworthy ai in the control room. Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-87440, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    2024

  3. [11]

    Demir, E., Hru s ovsk \`y , M., Jammernegg, W., and Van Woensel, T. (2019). Green intermodal freight transportation: bi-objective modelling and analysis. International Journal of Production Research , 57(19):6162--6180

    2019

  4. [12]

    Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36:10088--10115

    2023

  5. [13]

    Dorofeev, A., Kurganov, V., Filippova, N., Petrov, A., Zakharov, D., and Iarkov, S. (2024). Improving transportation management systems (tmss) based on the concept of digital twins of an organization. Applied Sciences , 14(4):1330

    2024

  6. [14]

    and Sinha, D

    Dua, A. and Sinha, D. (2019). Quality of multimodal freight transportation: a systematic literature review. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research , 8(2):167--194

    2019

  7. [15]

    J., Foropon, C., Tiwari, M., and Gunasekaran, A

    Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Tiwari, M., and Gunasekaran, A. (2022). How frugal innovation shape global sustainable supply chains during the pandemic crisis: lessons from the covid-19. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal , 27(2):295--311

    2022

  8. [16]

    and Weiss, G

    Ferber, J. and Weiss, G. (1999). Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence , volume 1. Addison-wesley Reading

    1999

  9. [17]

    Gamage, G., Mills, N., De Silva, D., Manic, M., Moraliyage, H., Jennings, A., and Alahakoon, D. (2024). Multi-agent rag chatbot architecture for decision support in net-zero emission energy systems. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) , pages ...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Giusti, R., Manerba, D., Bruno, G., and Tadei, R. (2019). Synchromodal logistics: An overview of critical success factors, enabling technologies, and open research issues. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , 129:92--110

    2019

  11. [19]

    S., Jernegan, L

    Golan, M. S., Jernegan, L. H., and Linkov, I. (2020). Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the covid-19 pandemic. Environment Systems and Decisions , 40(2):222--243

    2020

  12. [20]

    F., Connor, D., Fotheringham, A

    Goodchild, M. F., Connor, D., Fotheringham, A. S., Frazier, A., Kedron, P., Li, W., and Tong, D. (2024). Digital twins in urban informatics. Urban Informatics , 3(1):16

    2024

  13. [21]

    P., Fung, Y

    Huang, K.-H., Chan, H. P., Fung, Y. R., Qiu, H., Zhou, M., Joty, S., Chang, S.-F., and Ji, H. (2024). From pixels to insights: A survey on automatic chart understanding in the era of large foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12027

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (peft) — hugging face documentation

    Hugging Face (2025a). Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (peft) — hugging face documentation. https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/en/index. Accessed: 2025-06-14

    2025

  15. [23]

    Supervised fine-tuning trainer — hugging face trl documentation

    Hugging Face (2025b). Supervised fine-tuning trainer — hugging face trl documentation. https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/en/sft_trainer. Accessed: 2025-06-14

    2025

  16. [24]

    Issa, M., Chartrain, A., Viguier, F., Landes, B., Dessagne, G., Haddad, N., and Hill, D. R. (2024). Railway system digital twin: a tool for extended enterprises to perform multimodal transportation in a decarbonization context. In Transport Research Arena 2024 (TRA'24)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Kengpol, A., Tuammee, S., and Tuominen, M. (2014). The development of a framework for route selection in multimodal transportation. The International Journal of Logistics Management , 25(3):581--610

    2014

  18. [26]

    Krishnan, N. (2025). Advancing multi-agent systems through model context protocol: Architecture, implementation, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21030

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Li, X., Xu, H., Huang, X., Guo, C., Kang, Y., and Ye, X. (2021). Emerging geo-data sources to reveal human mobility dynamics during covid-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. Computational Urban Science , 1:1--9

    2021

  20. [28]

    Lv, B., Yang, B., Zhu, X., and Li, J. (2019). Operational optimization of transit consolidation in multimodal transport. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 129:454--464

    2019

  21. [29]

    Mai, G., Huang, W., Sun, J., Song, S., Mishra, D., Liu, N., Gao, S., Liu, T., Cong, G., Hu, Y., et al. (2024). On the opportunities and challenges of foundation models for geoai (vision paper). ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems

    2024

  22. [30]

    Mazzetto, S. (2024). A review of urban digital twins integration, challenges, and future directions in smart city development. Sustainability , 16(19):8337

    2024

  23. [31]

    Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., and Rajpurkar, P. (2023). Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature , 616(7956):259--265

    2023

  24. [32]

    Morra, E., Damiani, L., Revetria, R., Rozhok, A., and Olten, S. (2019). A case study of a digital twin for designing intermodal railways operations for a maritime terminal. In 17th International Industrial Simulation Conference , pages 98--101

    2019

  25. [33]

    I., Sathvik, A

    Myers, D., Mohawesh, R., Chellaboina, V. I., Sathvik, A. L., Venkatesh, P., Ho, Y.-H., Henshaw, H., Alhawawreh, M., Berdik, D., and Jararweh, Y. (2024). Foundation and large language models: fundamentals, challenges, opportunities, and social impacts. Cluster Computing , 27(1):1--26

    2024

  26. [34]

    K., and Grover, A

    Nguyen, T., Brandstetter, J., Kapoor, A., Gupta, J. K., and Grover, A. (2023). Climax: A foundation model for weather and climate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10343

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Niloofar, P., Lazarova-Molnar, S., Omitaomu, F., Xu, H., and Li, X. (2023). A general framework for human-in-the-loop cognitive digital twins. In 2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) , pages 3202--3213. IEEE

    2023

  28. [36]

    Pencheva, V., Asenov, A., Sladkowski, A., Ivanov, B., and Georgiev, I. (2022). Current issues of multimodal and intermodal cargo transportation. Modern trends and research in intermodal transportation , pages 51--124

    2022

  29. [37]

    and Mac \'a rio, R

    Reis, V. and Mac \'a rio, R. (2019). Intermodal freight transportation . Elsevier

    2019

  30. [38]

    Rossolov, A., Kopytkov, D., Kush, Y., and Zadorozhna, V. (2017). Research of effectiveness of unimodal and multimodal transportation involving land modes of transport. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies , (5 (3)):60--69

    2017

  31. [39]

    and Gecan, R

    Shirley, C. and Gecan, R. (2022). Emissions of carbon dioxide in the transportation sector

    2022

  32. [40]

    Staff, I. E. A. (2012). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion . OECD

    2012

  33. [41]

    Sun, M., Liang, C., and Chang, D. (2024). Enhancing shipyard transportation efficiency through dynamic scheduling using digital twin technology. Plos one , 19(2):e0297069

    2024

  34. [42]

    C., et al

    Tian, S., Jin, Q., Yeganova, L., Lai, P.-T., Zhu, Q., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Chen, Q., Kim, W., Comeau, D. C., et al. (2024). Opportunities and challenges for chatgpt and large language models in biomedicine and health. Briefings in Bioinformatics , 25(1):bbad493

    2024

  35. [43]

    A., Camur, M

    Tupayachi, J., Xu, H., Omitaomu, O. A., Camur, M. C., Sharmin, A., and Li, X. (2024). Towards next-generation urban decision support systems through ai-powered construction of scientific ontology using large language models—a case in optimizing intermodal freight transportatio...

    2024

  36. [44]

    S., Iqbal Nur, H., and Pertiwi, A

    Turbaningsih, O., Buana, I. S., Iqbal Nur, H., and Pertiwi, A. (2022). The multimodal transport analysis for project logistics: Export of indonesia’s train manufacturer. Cogent Social Sciences , 8(1):2095081

    2022

  37. [45]

    Department of Transportation , F

    U.S. Department of Transportation , F. H. A. (2024). Freight analysis framework (faf). https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/. Version 5.6, accessed June 2025

    2024

  38. [46]

    A., Gehlhoff, F., Dogan, A., and Fay, A

    Vogel-Heuser, B., Seitz, M., Cruz Salazar, L. A., Gehlhoff, F., Dogan, A., and Fay, A. (2020). Multi-agent systems to enable industry 4.0

    2020

  39. [47]

    M., Glassy, E

    Waqas, A., Bui, M. M., Glassy, E. F., El Naqa, I., Borkowski, P., Borkowski, A. A., and Rasool, G. (2023). Revolutionizing digital pathology with the power of generative artificial intelligence and foundation models. Laboratory Investigation , page 100255

    2023

  40. [48]

    V., Zhou, D., et al

    Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., Zhou, D., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems , 35:24824--24837

    2022

  41. [49]

    Wooldridge, M. (2009). An introduction to multiagent systems . John wiley & sons

    2009

  42. [50]

    A., Ravulaparthy, S

    Xu, H., Berres, A., Tennille, S. A., Ravulaparthy, S. K., Wang, C., and Sanyal, J. (2021). Continuous emulation and multiscale visualization of traffic flow using stationary roadside sensor data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 23(8):10530--10541

    2021

  43. [51]

    B., Sorensen, H., Nugent, P

    Xu, H., Berres, A., Yoginath, S. B., Sorensen, H., Nugent, P. J., Severino, J., Tennille, S. A., Moore, A., Jones, W., and Sanyal, J. (2023). Smart mobility in the cloud: Enabling real-time situational awareness and cyber-physical control through a digital twin for traffic. IE...

    2023

  44. [52]

    J., and Omitaomu, O

    Xu, H., Li, X., Tupayachi, J., Lian, J. J., and Omitaomu, O. A. (2024a). Automating bibliometric analysis with sentence transformers and retrieval-augmented generation (rag): A pilot study in semantic and contextual search for customized literature characterization for high-im...

    2024

  45. [53]

    Xu, H., Omitaomu, F., Sabri, S., Li, X., and Song, Y. (2024b). Leveraging generative ai for smart city digital twins: A survey on the autonomous generation of data, scenarios, 3d city models, and urban designs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19464

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Xu, H., Windsor, M., Muste, M., and Demir, I. (2020). A web-based decision support system for collaborative mitigation of multiple water-related hazards using serious gaming. Journal of environmental management , 255:109887

    2020

  47. [55]

    Xu, H., Yuan, J., Zhou, A., Xu, G., Li, W., Ye, X., et al. (2024c). Genai-powered multi-agent paradigm for smart urban mobility: Opportunities and challenges for integrating large language models (llms) and retrieval-augmented generation (rag) with intelligent transportation s...

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    T., and Huang, G

    Yang, X., Kong, X. T., and Huang, G. Q. (2024). Synchronizing crowdsourced co-modality between passenger and freight transportation services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , 184:103490

    2024

  49. [57]

    C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P

    Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Selvi, G. C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Raj, G. D., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., Wang, W., et al. (2024). Gpt (generative pre-trained transformer)--a comprehensive review on enabling technologies, potential applications, ...

    2024

  50. [58]

    Zhang, Q., Ding, K., Lyv, T., Wang, X., Yin, Q., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Li, X., Xiang, Z., et al. (2024a). Scientific large language models: A survey on biological & chemical domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14656

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Zhang, W., Han, J., Xu, Z., Ni, H., Liu, H., and Xiong, H. (2024b). Urban foundation models: A survey. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages 6633--6643

    2024

  52. [60]

    Zhang, Y., Gao, J., Tan, Z., Zhou, L., Ding, K., Zhou, M., Zhang, S., and Wang, D. (2024c). Data-centric foundation models in computational healthcare: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02458

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.