Three-dimensional stochastic wave equation with non-Lipschitz coefficients

Jingyu Huang; Wenxuan Tao

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 22 references

Three-dimensional stochastic wave equation with non-Lipschitz coefficients

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the three-dimensional stochastic wave equation with multiplicative Gaussian noise admits a unique global mild solution when drift and diffusion grow only logarithmically faster than linearly, under covariance…

desk verdict Genuine extension of Mueller's wave-equation result to 3D with a new covariance assumption; the main theorem is new, but Proposition 3.1 has an unpatched hypothesis gap that should be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06646 v1 pith:25N7AEHD submitted 2026-08-06 math.PR

Jingyu Huang , Wenxuan Tao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 60H1535L05

keywords stochasticwaveequationglobalmildsolutionnon-LipschitzcoefficientsmultiplicativeGaussiannoisespatialcovarianceHölderregularityRieszkernelBessel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes global existence and uniqueness for the three-dimensional stochastic wave equation driven by multiplicative Gaussian noise that is white in time and colored in space, when the drift and diffusion coefficients are only locally Lipschitz and grow logarithmically faster than linearly. The result covers $b(u)=u\log_+u^{\theta_1}$ with $\theta_1\in(0,2)$ and $\sigma(u)=u\log_+u^{\theta_2}$ with $\theta_2\in(0,(\bar\nu+1)/2)$, where $\bar\nu$ is fixed by the spatial covariance of the noise. A sympathetic reader should care because most previous work on non-Lipschitz stochastic PDEs concerned heat equations, while the wave equation in three dimensions is harder: its fundamental solution is a measure supported on a sphere. The proof handles that sphere by recentering the surface measures and exploiting second-order cancellation estimates for the covariance, then uses a stopping-time argument adapted from the one- and two-dimensional theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 3D wave kernel $G_t=\frac{1}{4\pi t}A_t$, where $A_t$ is uniform surface measure on the sphere of radius $t$, with the scaling property $G_t(dy)=tG_1(t^{-1}dy)$ and the convolution identity $(G_s*G_t)(dx)=\frac{1}{8\pi|x|}\mathbf{1}_{[s-t,s+t]}(|x|)\,dx$. The argument recenters all spherical measures at the origin to turn stochastic-integral terms into convolutions, where Assumption 1.1's bounds (1.6)--(1.8) control the $L^p$ moments and the spherical cancellation estimates (1.9)--(1.10) control temporal increments. These H\"older estimates feed a stopping-time construction: drift and diffusion are truncated at levels $N_n=K2^n$, and events on dyadic space-time grids ensure the truncated solutions agree up to a common time that grows to infinity.

What would settle it

Compute the left-hand sides of (1.9) and (1.10) for a spatial covariance $f$ that satisfies (1.6)--(1.8) but has oscillatory or anisotropic structure, such as $f(z)=\cos(k\cdot z)/(1+|z|^2)$; if either quantity fails to be $O(h^{\mu_1})$ or $O(h^{2\mu_2})$ with positive exponents as $h\to 0$, then Proposition 3.2's temporal H\"older estimate is unavailable, and the paper's proof of Theorem 1.2 does not close for that noise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: for a spatial covariance $f$ satisfying Assumption 1.1 (in particular the integrability and spherical-difference bounds (1.6)--(1.10)), and for locally Lipschitz drift $b$ and diffusion $\sigma$ with $b(z)=O(|z|(\log|z|)^{\theta_1})$, $\sigma(z)=O(|z|(\log|z|)^{\theta_2})$, $0<\theta_1<2$, $0<\theta_2<(\bar\nu+1)/2$ with $\bar\nu=\min\{\nu,\nu_1,\nu_2\}$, there exists a unique global mild solution to (1.1) on every $[0,T]$ from bounded H\"older initial data. The mechanism is to prove moment bounds and spatial and temporal H\"older estimates for the truncated globally Lipschitz equations, then to patch solutions across an increasing sequence of stopping times using the logarithmic growth to keep the patching events overwhelmingly likely until $\tau_\infty=\infty$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof stands on the two spherical cancellation estimates (1.9) and (1.10) for the spatial covariance $f$: without them the temporal H\"older bound in Proposition 3.2 does not follow, and the stopping-time argument cannot close; these estimates are verified for smooth, Riesz, and Bessel kernels but are not consequences of the simpler growth bounds (1.6)--(1.8).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any fixed $T>0$ and admissible initial data, the solution $u$ exists, is unique, and has finite $L^p$ moments uniformly on $[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}^3$.
The theorem applies to Riesz kernels $f(z)=|z|^{-\beta}$ with $0<\beta<2$ and to Bessel kernels of order $\alpha>3$, giving explicit ranges for $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ in both cases.
It also applies to every bounded covariance $f\in C^2_b(\mathbb{R}^3)$, with the simplest parameter values $\nu=\nu_1=\nu_2=2$ and $\gamma_1=\gamma_2=\mu_1=\mu_2=1$.
Within the stated growth classes, no finite-time blow-up can occur on any fixed time interval, in contrast to supercritical polynomial growth where earlier blow-up results apply.
The mild solution is built coherently from truncated equations, so it coincides with the unique Lipschitz-coefficient solution on every set where the solution stays below the truncation level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Going beyond the paper: the explicit threshold $\theta_2<(\bar\nu+1)/2$ raises the question of whether $\theta_2=(\bar\nu+1)/2$ is a genuine critical exponent; at that value the summability estimate in Proposition 4.2 stops being strict, and testing the borderline case would require a separate argument.
Going beyond the paper: the spherical cancellation conditions (1.9)--(1.10) are shape conditions on the covariance rather than simple integrability conditions, so covariances with strong anisotropy or oscillation may fail them even when (1.6)--(1.8) hold; checking such an $f$ would delineate the method's scope.
Going beyond the paper: the same machinery of H\"older estimates plus stopping times could be adapted to other wave-type equations with measure-supported kernels, such as the damped wave equation in three dimensions, where the kernel has similar sphere structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Short version: this is a genuine new theorem—existence and uniqueness for the 3D stochastic wave equation with multiplicative noise and coefficients with logarithmic superlinear growth—and the proof is mostly solid. It deserves a serious referee, but Proposition 3.1 has a real hole that needs patching before the paper is complete.

What's new: Mueller's 1997 result covered R and R^2 with σ(u) up to (log|u|)^α, α<1/2. Huang and Tao push this to R^3, where the wave kernel is a surface measure, which is the technically awkward case. They introduce Assumption 1.1 on the spatial covariance (second-order spherical cancellation estimates), prove spatial and temporal Hölder moment bounds, then close the argument with the standard truncation-and-stopping-time scheme. The parameter threshold θ2 < (ν̄+1)/2 is explicit and natural. The verification for C^2_b, Riesz, and Bessel kernels is concrete and useful. This is real work, and the main theorem is not a corollary of anything in [9]—the earlier paper is used for lemmas, which is legitimate.

Soft spots. The stress-test concern is real: in the proof of Proposition 3.1, the estimate for Q21 uses |σ(u)|² ≤ L_σ²(1+|u|²) without assuming |σ(0)|/L_σ ≤ C. As stated, the proposition is for arbitrary globally Lipschitz σ, so the proof as written doesn't go through. The authors acknowledge this in a parenthetical ("since finally in this paper L_σ will be large, see (4.2)") but that doesn't fix the statement. The fix is easy—either add the hypothesis or carry the |σ(0)|² term through and absorb it into M—and because the truncation levels in Section 4 have L_σN growing like (log N)^θ2, the main theorem is probably safe. But the proposition needs to be stated correctly.

Second, the paper leans heavily on [5], [7], [9] for key estimates. That's not a flaw by itself, but it does mean the referee should check those imports carefully. Third, the assumptions on initial data are a bit stiff (u0 ∈ C^2, bounded, with Hölder Δu0), but that matches the 3D kernel and isn't a problem.

Bottom line: this is a solid technical contribution for the SPDE regularity community. Send it to a serious referee, but expect a revision. If the authors fix Prop 3.1 and make the dependence on [9] explicit, I'd be happy with it.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the three-dimensional stochastic wave equation (1.1) driven by multiplicative Gaussian noise that is white in time and correlated in space, with locally Lipschitz drift b and diffusion coefficient σ satisfying the logarithmic growth conditions (1.11). Under Assumption 1.1 on the spatial covariance f, the authors prove existence and uniqueness of a global mild solution on any fixed time interval [0,T] (Theorem 1.2). The proof combines a truncation/stopping-time argument adapted from Mueller [11] with spatial and temporal Hölder regularity estimates for the equation with globally Lipschitz coefficients (Propositions 3.1 and 3.2). These regularity estimates rely on Assumption 1.1, which is verified for C^2_b functions, Riesz kernels, and Bessel kernels in Section 5. The paper also gives a self-contained moment bound (Proposition 2.1) for the globally Lipschitz case.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a meaningful extension of Mueller's long-time existence theory for stochastic wave equations from dimensions one and two to dimension three, where the wave kernel is a surface measure and the analysis is considerably more delicate. The paper makes the covariance assumptions explicit and demonstrates them on several natural examples, and the proof is presented in considerable detail. The main technical gap identified in Proposition 3.1 is local and appears readily fixable without changing the theorem; the other issues are notational or typographical. The reliance on [9] is as a tool for regularity estimates, and I do not see a circularity problem.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.1, Eq. (3.8)] The estimate of Q21 in (3.8) is obtained by writing |σ(u)|^2 ≤ L_σ^2(1+|u|^2), which uses the implicit inequality |σ(0)| ≤ C L_σ. This is not a hypothesis of Proposition 3.1, which is stated for arbitrary globally Lipschitz σ. The sentence 'In Q21 we have bounded |σ(0)|/Lσ by a constant since finally in this paper Lσ will be large, see (4.2)' refers to the truncated coefficients in Section 4 and does not justify the general statement. The proof can be repaired either by adding L_σ ≥ C|σ(0)| as an explicit hypothesis of Proposition 3.1, or by carrying the extra |σ(0)|^2 |w|^{2γ1} ∫_0^t (t-s)^{ν1} ds term through the Gronwall argument and absorbing it into the forcing term M|w|^{2γ̄} on the right-hand side of (3.1). Since Theorem 1.2 uses the proposition only for truncations with L_{σ_N} = O((log N)^{θ_2}) → ∞, this gap does not invalidate the main theorem, but the proof as written is incomplete.
[Section 3.2, Proposition 3.2 and proof] The exponent in the statement is displayed as '0< µ < µ= 1/2 min{2µ2, ν+ 1,2 γ, γ+µ 1}' with γ undefined, while the proof uses '0<2µ <2 µ := min{2µ2,2 γ, ν+ 1,γ+µ 1}'. The symbol γ should be ¯γ = min{α1,α2,α3,γ1,γ2}, and the two displays should be normalized so that the Hölder exponent claimed in (3.13) is unambiguous. This matters because Lemma 4.4 and Proposition 4.2 subsequently use the exponent γ∧µ with a separate parameter γ ∈ (0,γ̄), and the current notation makes it difficult to verify that the constants are uniform over the truncation levels and over the choice of γ.
[Section 4, definition of E_1 (Eq. (4.7))] The event E_1 is defined as {sup_{C(t_1,0)} |u^{N_1}(t,x)| ≤ M + K^2}, but the induction in (4.9) and the argument in Lemma 4.3 require the base case sup_{C(t_1,0)} |u^{N_1}(t,x)| ≤ M + K/2, which is the value obtained by substituting n=1 into the general increment K 2^{n-2}. With the printed definition, E_1 only gives M+K^2, and the chain of inequalities in (4.9) fails for large K; the proof of Proposition 4.2 is therefore not justified as written. This is evidently a typographical slip (K^2 should be K/2), but it must be corrected, or the induction in (4.9) reformulated, before the stopping-time proof is valid.

minor comments (3)

[Section 5.2 and 5.3] The verifications of (1.9) and (1.10) for the Riesz and Bessel kernels are delegated to [9, Proposition 5.3] and [9, Proposition 5.4] without explicitly listing the inherited parameter choices for γ1, γ2, µ1, µ2, ν1, and ν2. Please state the resulting parameter assignments so that the reader can confirm that the version of Assumption 1.1 used here is indeed satisfied.
[Theorem 1.2 and abstract] The growth condition (1.11) is written with log|z|, while the abstract uses log_+(z)=log(z∨e). For consistency, define log_+ immediately before (1.11) or assume |z| large enough so that the two statements agree outside a compact set.
[Proposition 2.1, Eq. (2.6)] The constant M in (2.6) contains T∥v0∥_{L∞} + ∥u0∥_{L∞} + T∥∇u0∥_{L∞}; since the preceding display bounds |V(t,x)| by t∥v0∥_{L∞} + ∥u0∥_{L∞} + t∥∇u0∥_{L∞}, it would be clearer to write sup_{t∈[0,T]} explicitly when defining M.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.2 is proved from explicit assumptions on f, b, and σ; the cited self-work [9] supplies technical lemmas, not the main existence conclusion.

full rationale

The central claim, global existence and uniqueness for the 3D stochastic wave equation with non-Lipschitz coefficients, is a genuinely new conditional result. It is derived from Assumption 1.1 on the spatial covariance f, the moment bound in Proposition 2.1, and the spatial and temporal Hölder estimates in Propositions 3.1 and 3.2, using a stopping-time argument adapted from Mueller [11]. The paper does not fit any parameter to the target solution, and Theorem 1.2 is not assumed anywhere in the hypotheses. The main self-citations are to [9] (Hu–Huang–Nualart, coauthored by Huang) for the wave-kernel convolution identity in Lemma 2.2, for the spherical-kernel technique, and for verification of parts of Assumption 1.1 in the Riesz and Bessel examples. These citations are external, published technical facts used as tools: the identity parameter-free and checkable, and the covariance examples only illustrate applicability of the conditional theorem. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to force the choice of the stopping-time construction, and the logarithmic growth conditions on b and σ are explicitly stated hypotheses rather than conclusions. The only questionable passage is the sentence 'In Q21 we have bounded |σ(0)|/Lσ by a constant since finally in this paper Lσ will be large, see (4.2)' in the proof of Proposition 3.1. That is an incomplete justification for a constant in an estimate, not an instance of the conclusion being inserted into the assumptions; it is a proof gap to be patched, not a circular step. Therefore the paper has no significant circularity, and the low score reflects only the presence of self-citations in auxiliary, non-load-bearing roles.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; θ1 and θ2 are problem inputs. The proof relies on standard SPDE lemmas and the paper's own Assumption 1.1 on the spatial covariance. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

standard math Wave kernel convolution identity: for s≥t, (G_s * G_t)(dx) = (1/(8π|x|)) 1_{[s-t,s+t]}(|x|) dx (Lemma 2.2, from [9]).
Used throughout Sections 2 and 3 to reduce double sphere integrals to single integrals of f/|z|; cited without proof.
standard math Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality for Itô-Walsh integrals (Theorem B.1 of [10]).
Controls stochastic convolution by the L^2 norm of the integrand in all moment estimates; cited from Khoshnevisan.
standard math Deterministic wave regularity bound V(t',t,x)^2 ≤ C(|t'-t|^{2α2} + |t'-t|^{2α3}) ([5, Lemma 4.9]).
Used in the proof of Proposition 3.2 to bound the initial-data contribution to temporal increments.
standard math Riesz kernel representation and integral bounds ([5, Lemma 2.6] and [7, Corollary 3.4], used as Lemma A.1 and A.2).
Used to verify Assumption 1.1 for the Riesz kernel f(z)=|z|^{-β}.
domain assumption Assumption 1.1 on the spatial covariance f, including the sphere-path estimates (1.9) and (1.10).
The paper's key structural condition; it is verified for C_b^2, Riesz, and Bessel kernels but not derived from simpler principles.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional stochastic wave equation with non-Lipschitz coefficients." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25N7AEHD

@misc{pith2026260806646,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional stochastic wave equation with non-Lipschitz coefficients},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25N7AEHD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06646}
}

abstract

We consider the three-dimensional stochastic wave equation (SWE) driven by a multiplicative Gaussian noise that is white in time and colored in space: \[ \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} = \Delta u + b\bigl(u\bigr) + \sigma\bigl(u\bigr)\,\dot{W}, \] where the drift function $ b $ and diffusion coefficient $\sigma$ are assumed to be locally Lipschitz and exhibit logarithmic superlinear growth at infinity. We establish the existence and uniqueness of a global mild solution on any fixed time interval $[0,T]$ under suitable assumptions on the spatial covariance function $ f $ of the noise $\dot W(t,x)$. Our results apply, for example, to the case \[ b(u) = u (\log_+ u)^{\theta_1} \quad \text{and} \quad \sigma(u) = u (\log_+ u)^{\theta_2}, \] with parameters $\theta_1 \in (0,2)$ and $\theta_2 \in \bigl(0, \tfrac{\bar{\nu}+1}{2}\bigr)$, and $\log_+(z)=\log(z\vee e)$, where $\bar{\nu}$ is determined by the assumptions on $ f $.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[9]

Partial Differ

Yaozhong Hu, Jingyu Huang, and David Nualart,On H¨ older continuity of the solution of stochastic wave equations in dimension three, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.2(2014), no. 3, 353–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-014-0035-5. MR3255232

work page doi:10.1007/s40072-014-0035-5 2014
[5]

Dalang and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e,H¨ older-Sobolev regularity of the solution to the stochastic wave equation in dimension three, Mem

Robert C. Dalang and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e,H¨ older-Sobolev regularity of the solution to the stochastic wave equation in dimension three, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.199(2009), no. 931, vi+70,https://doi.org/ 10.1090/memo/0931. MR2512755

work page doi:10.1090/memo/0931 2009
[7]

Mohammud Foondun and Davar Khoshnevisan,On the stochastic heat equation with spatially-colored random forcing, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.365(2013), no. 1, 409–458,https://doi.org/10.1090/ S0002-9947-2012-05616-9. MR2984063. 3D STOCHASTIC W A VE EQUATION WITH NON-LIPSCHITZ COEFFICIENTS 31

work page 2013
[11]

Probab.25(1997), no

Carl Mueller,Long time existence for the wave equation with a noise term, Ann. Probab.25(1997), no. 1, 133–151,https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1024404282. MR1428503

arXiv 1997
[1]

5, Paper No

Le Chen, Mohammud Foondun, Jingyu Huang, and Michael Salins,Global solution for superlinear stochastic heat equation onR d under Osgood-type conditions, Nonlinearity38(2025), no. 5, Paper No. 055026, 25,https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/add3b2. MR4904500

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/add3b2 2025
[2]

Le Chen, Jingyu Huang, and Wenxuan Tao,A stochastic heat equation with non-locally lipschitz coeffi- cients, Preprint arXiv:2507.23637, to appear in Bernoulli (2025September),https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2507.23637

work page Pith review arXiv
[3]

Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Tusheng Zhang,Global solutions to stochastic reaction- diffusion equations with super-linear drift and multiplicative noise, Ann

Robert C. Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Tusheng Zhang,Global solutions to stochastic reaction- diffusion equations with super-linear drift and multiplicative noise, Ann. Probab.47(2019), no. 1, 519– 559,https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOP1270. MR3909975

doi:10.1214/18-aop1270 2019
[4]

Dalang and Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons,Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo

Robert C. Dalang and Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons,Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo. Math. 29(2011), no. 1, 67–109,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2010.09.005. MR2785545

work page doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2010.09.005 2011

Show all 22 references

[6]

D238(2009), no

Julian Fern´ andez Bonder and Pablo Groisman,Time-space white noise eliminates global solutions in reaction-diffusion equations, Phys. D238(2009), no. 2, 209–215,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd. 2008.09.005. MR2516340

2009 doi
[8]

Differential Equations318(2022), 557–578,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022

Mohammud Foondun and Eulalia Nualart,Non-existence results for stochastic wave equations in one dimension, J. Differential Equations318(2022), 557–578,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022. 02.038. MR4387900

2022 doi
[10]

119, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014

Davar Khoshnevisan,Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 119, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014. MR3222416

2014
[12]

Theory Related Fields110(1998), no

,Long-time existence for signed solutions of the heat equation with a noise term, Probab. Theory Related Fields110(1998), no. 1, 51–68,https://doi.org/10.1007/s004400050144. MR1602036

1998 doi
[13]

Probab.28(2000), no

,The critical parameter for the heat equation with a noise term to blow up in finite time, Ann. Probab.28(2000), no. 4, 1735–1746,https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1019160505. MR1813841

2000
[14]

Theory Related Fields97(1993), no

Carl Mueller and Richard Sowers,Blowup for the heat equation with a noise term, Probab. Theory Related Fields97(1993), no. 3, 287–320,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01195068. MR1245247

1993 doi
[15]

Szymon Peszat,The Cauchy problem for a nonlinear stochastic wave equation in any dimension, J. Evol. Equ.2(2002), no. 3, 383–394,https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013197. MR1930613

2002 doi
[16]

Theory Related Fields116(2000), no

Szymon Peszat and Jerzy Zabczyk,Nonlinear stochastic wave and heat equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields116(2000), no. 3, 421–443,https://doi.org/10.1007/s004400050257. MR1749283

2000 doi
[17]

Salins,Global solutions to the stochastic heat equation with superlinear accretive reaction term and polynomially growing multiplicative white noise coefficient, Stoch

M. Salins,Global solutions to the stochastic heat equation with superlinear accretive reaction term and polynomially growing multiplicative white noise coefficient, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 14(2026), no. 1, 109–132,https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-025-00351-6. MR5015569

2026 doi
[18]

Dyn.22(2022), no

Michael Salins,Existence and uniqueness of global solutions to the stochastic heat equation with su- perlinear drift on an unbounded spatial domain, Stoch. Dyn.22(2022), no. 5, Paper No. 2250014, 30, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219493722500149. MR4486234

2022 doi
[19]

,Global solutions for the stochastic reaction-diffusion equation with super-linear multiplicative noise and strong dissipativity, Electron. J. Probab.27(2022), Paper No. 12, 17,https://doi.org/10. 1214/22-ejp740. MR4372099

2022
[20]

Probab.53(2025), no

,Solutions to the stochastic heat equation with polynomially growing multiplicative noise do not explode in the critical regime, Ann. Probab.53(2025), no. 1, 223–238,https://doi.org/10.1214/ 24-aop1704. MR4852006

2025
[21]

Shijie Shang and Tusheng Zhang,Global well-posedness to stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on the real lineRwith superlinear drifts driven by multiplicative space-time white noise, Preprint arXiv:2106.02879 (2021June),http://arXiv.org/abs/2106.02879

arXiv
[22]

Walsh,An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations, ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984, 1986, pp

John B. Walsh,An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations, ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984, 1986, pp. 265–439. MR876085. 1 School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United King- dom Email address: † j.hua...

1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

Partial Differ

Yaozhong Hu, Jingyu Huang, and David Nualart,On H¨ older continuity of the solution of stochastic wave equations in dimension three, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.2(2014), no. 3, 353–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-014-0035-5. MR3255232

work page doi:10.1007/s40072-014-0035-5 2014

[2] [5]

Dalang and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e,H¨ older-Sobolev regularity of the solution to the stochastic wave equation in dimension three, Mem

Robert C. Dalang and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e,H¨ older-Sobolev regularity of the solution to the stochastic wave equation in dimension three, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.199(2009), no. 931, vi+70,https://doi.org/ 10.1090/memo/0931. MR2512755

work page doi:10.1090/memo/0931 2009

[3] [7]

Mohammud Foondun and Davar Khoshnevisan,On the stochastic heat equation with spatially-colored random forcing, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.365(2013), no. 1, 409–458,https://doi.org/10.1090/ S0002-9947-2012-05616-9. MR2984063. 3D STOCHASTIC W A VE EQUATION WITH NON-LIPSCHITZ COEFFICIENTS 31

work page 2013

[4] [11]

Probab.25(1997), no

Carl Mueller,Long time existence for the wave equation with a noise term, Ann. Probab.25(1997), no. 1, 133–151,https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1024404282. MR1428503

arXiv 1997

[5] [1]

5, Paper No

Le Chen, Mohammud Foondun, Jingyu Huang, and Michael Salins,Global solution for superlinear stochastic heat equation onR d under Osgood-type conditions, Nonlinearity38(2025), no. 5, Paper No. 055026, 25,https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/add3b2. MR4904500

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/add3b2 2025

[6] [2]

Le Chen, Jingyu Huang, and Wenxuan Tao,A stochastic heat equation with non-locally lipschitz coeffi- cients, Preprint arXiv:2507.23637, to appear in Bernoulli (2025September),https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2507.23637

work page Pith review arXiv

[7] [3]

Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Tusheng Zhang,Global solutions to stochastic reaction- diffusion equations with super-linear drift and multiplicative noise, Ann

Robert C. Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Tusheng Zhang,Global solutions to stochastic reaction- diffusion equations with super-linear drift and multiplicative noise, Ann. Probab.47(2019), no. 1, 519– 559,https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOP1270. MR3909975

doi:10.1214/18-aop1270 2019

[8] [4]

Dalang and Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons,Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo

Robert C. Dalang and Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons,Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo. Math. 29(2011), no. 1, 67–109,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2010.09.005. MR2785545

work page doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2010.09.005 2011