Subcubic graphs without eigenvalues in (-1, 1)
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:51 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Connected subcubic graphs without eigenvalues in (-1,1) consist of two infinite families and seven sporadic examples at most 18 vertices large.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We show that exactly two infinite families and seven sporadic examples occur, and that every sporadic graph has at most 18 vertices. As a consequence, (-1,1) is a maximal spectral gap set for the class of connected subcubic graphs.
What carries the argument
The complete list of non-cubic connected subcubic graphs avoiding eigenvalues in (-1,1), obtained via structural analysis and exhaustive enumeration up to 18 vertices.
Load-bearing premise
That no additional infinite families or larger sporadic graphs without eigenvalues in (-1,1) exist beyond those found.
What would settle it
A connected subcubic graph with 19 or more vertices, not in the two families, that has no eigenvalues in the interval (-1,1) would contradict the classification.
Figures
read the original abstract
Guo and Royle recently classified the connected cubic graphs without eigenvalues of their adjacency matrix in the open interval $(-1, 1)$, and raised the question of extending their classification to graphs of maximum degree at most $3$. They carried out a preliminary investigation of the subcubic case, exhibiting both infinite families and sporadic examples. In this paper, we complete this investigation by determining all connected subcubic graphs that are not cubic and have no eigenvalues in $(-1,1)$. We show that exactly two infinite families and seven sporadic examples occur, and that every sporadic graph has at most $18$ vertices. As a consequence, we prove that $(-1,1)$ is a maximal spectral gap set for the class of connected subcubic graphs. Guo and Royle, answering a question of Koll\'ar and Sanark, established this maximality for connected cubic graphs. Our result generalizes their conclusion to the subcubic setting.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript classifies all connected subcubic graphs (maximum degree ≤3) whose adjacency matrices have no eigenvalues in the open interval (-1,1). It identifies exactly two infinite families together with seven sporadic examples, each on at most 18 vertices. As a direct consequence, (-1,1) is shown to be a maximal spectral gap set for the class of all connected subcubic graphs, extending the cubic-graph result of Guo and Royle.
Significance. If the classification holds, the result supplies a complete, explicit description of the subcubic graphs avoiding eigenvalues in (-1,1), with concrete infinite families and a sharp bound on the size of exceptions. This generalizes the cubic case and yields a clean maximality statement for the spectral gap, which is useful for further work on eigenvalue gaps in bounded-degree graphs. The standard combination of structural families plus bounded enumeration is executed here without introducing free parameters or ad-hoc reductions.
major comments (1)
- [§4] §4 (enumeration step): the claim that the seven sporadic graphs are the only ones up to 18 vertices rests on an exhaustive computer search; the manuscript must state the precise algorithm, the software used, and the verification that every connected subcubic graph on ≤18 vertices was tested for eigenvalues in (-1,1). This check is load-bearing for the “exactly seven” assertion.
minor comments (3)
- [§3] The statement of the two infinite families would be clearer if their adjacency matrices or characteristic polynomials were displayed explicitly in a single proposition.
- [Table 1] Table 1 (list of sporadic graphs) should include the exact number of vertices and the multiplicity of eigenvalue 0 for each example to facilitate independent verification.
- [§5] A brief remark on why the maximality proof does not extend immediately to disconnected graphs would avoid a minor scope ambiguity in the final corollary.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the enumeration procedure. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§4] §4 (enumeration step): the claim that the seven sporadic graphs are the only ones up to 18 vertices rests on an exhaustive computer search; the manuscript must state the precise algorithm, the software used, and the verification that every connected subcubic graph on ≤18 vertices was tested for eigenvalues in (-1,1). This check is load-bearing for the “exactly seven” assertion.
Authors: We agree that the current description of the enumeration in §4 is insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to specify the exact algorithm (a depth-first generation of all connected graphs with maximum degree 3, filtered by connectivity and order), the software employed (SageMath 9.5 together with its nauty interface for isomorphism-free generation), and the verification steps (eigenvalue computation via numpy.linalg.eigvals on the adjacency matrix for each generated graph, followed by an explicit interval check). We will also note that the search was run exhaustively for all orders from 1 to 18 and that the seven graphs listed are the only ones satisfying the spectral condition. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The derivation proceeds by structural arguments that extend the independent classification of cubic graphs by Guo and Royle (external citation) to the subcubic non-cubic case. The two infinite families and seven sporadic examples are identified via case analysis on maximum degree 3 graphs, with an exhaustive bound of 18 vertices established by direct verification rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. The maximality of the spectral gap (-1,1) follows immediately from the completeness of this list without reducing any new claim to a prior result by the same authors or to an input by construction. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Adjacency matrix of an undirected graph is real symmetric, hence has real eigenvalues
- standard math Eigenvalue interlacing holds for induced subgraphs
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Median eigenvalues of subcubic graphs, 2025
Hricha Acharya, Benjamin Jeter, and Zilin Jiang. Median eigenvalues of subcubic graphs, 2025. arXiv:2502.13139 [math.CO]
-
[2]
Lowell W. Beineke. Characterizations of derived graphs. J. Combinatorial Theory , 9:129–135, 1970
work page 1970
-
[3]
P. J. Cameron, J.-M. Goethals, J. J. Seidel, and E. E. Shult. Line graphs, root systems, and elliptic geometry. J. Algebra, 43(1):305–327, 1976. 30
work page 1976
-
[4]
Large regular bipartite graphs with median eigenvalue 1
Krystal Guo and Bojan Mohar. Large regular bipartite graphs with median eigenvalue 1. Linear Algebra Appl., 449:68–75, 2014. arXiv:1309.7025 [math.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[5]
Krystal Guo and Gordon F. Royle. Cubic graphs with no eigenvalues in the interval ( −2, 0),
- [6]
- [7]
-
[8]
Alan J. Hoffman. On graphs whose least eigenvalue exceeds −1 − √
-
[9]
Linear Algebra Appl., 16(2):153–165, 1977
work page 1977
-
[10]
Multiple Kronecker covering graphs.European J
Wilfried Imrich and Tomaˇ z Pisanski. Multiple Kronecker covering graphs.European J. Combin., 29(5):1116–1122, 2008. arXiv:0505135 [math.CO]
work page 2008
-
[11]
Alicia J. Koll´ ar and Peter Sarnak. Gap sets for the spectra of cubic graphs. Commun. Am. Math. Soc., 1:1–38, 2021. arXiv:2005.05379 [math-ph]
-
[12]
Median eigenvalues of bipartite subcubic graphs
Bojan Mohar. Median eigenvalues of bipartite subcubic graphs. Combin. Probab. Comput., 25(5):768–790, 2016. arXiv:1309.7395 [math.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[13]
Congruent Graphs and the Connectivity of Graphs
Hassler Whitney. Congruent Graphs and the Connectivity of Graphs. Amer. J. Math. , 54(1):150–168, 1932. 31
work page 1932
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.