pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.01985 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Pair distribution functions of a superfluid spin-1/2 Fermi gas with contact interactions in the linearized time-dependent BCS theory

Yvan Castin (LKB (Lhomond)) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords pair distribution functionssuperfluid Fermi gastime-dependent BCS theoryfluctuation-dissipation theoremphonon excitationsquantum fluctuationscold atomscontact interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linearized time-dependent BCS theory is required to compute pair distribution functions in superfluid Fermi gases

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that static BCS theory ignores the acoustic phonon branch and pair-breaking fluctuations when calculating pair distribution functions g_σσ'(r, r') in a homogeneous unpolarized spin-1/2 superfluid Fermi gas. The linearized time-dependent BCS theory, applied through the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, incorporates these excitations and produces results that match the superfluid equation of state even at zero temperature. This approach also lets the opposite-spin distribution fall below its asymptotic value at long range and adds specific logarithmic corrections at short range. A reader would care because these functions are observable in cold-atom experiments and directly reveal how collective modes shape spatial correlations.

Core claim

The central claim is that the minimal mean-field theory for the pair distribution functions g_σσ'(r, r') of a spatially homogeneous, unpolarized spin-1/2 superfluid Fermi gas with contact interactions is the linearized time-dependent BCS theory implemented via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem rather than static BCS theory, because only the former includes the acoustic excitation branch and the quantum fluctuations induced by the broken-pair continuum.

What carries the argument

Linearized time-dependent BCS theory via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, which adds the phonon spectrum and pair-breaking continuum to the static mean-field treatment of the distributions.

If this is right

  • The theory reproduces the effect of collective excitations on the equation of state at zero temperature.
  • g_up down(r, r') drops strictly below its long-distance value (density/2)^2 at large separations, consistent with Landau-Khalatnikov hydrodynamics.
  • g_up up(r, r') acquires subdominant short-distance terms |r-r'|^2 ln|r-r'| in three dimensions and |r-r'|^2 ln(-ln|r-r'|) in two dimensions.
  • The predictions apply directly to ongoing cold-atom experiments measuring these distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be tested by measuring how the short-range corrections evolve when the scattering length is tuned across the BEC-BCS crossover.
  • Extending the method to trapped geometries would allow direct comparison with current ENS and MIT data on local pair correlations.
  • If the phonon contribution dominates the long-range behavior, similar corrections should appear in other observables such as the dynamic structure factor.

Load-bearing premise

The linearized time-dependent BCS equations plus the fluctuation-dissipation theorem capture all relevant collective excitations and quantum fluctuations without needing higher-order corrections.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring the opposite-spin pair distribution g_up down(r, r') that remains above or equal to (density/2)^2 at all large separations would show that the phonon contribution is not required.

read the original abstract

We show that the minimal mean-field theory to use for calculating the pair distribution functions $g_{\sigma\sigma'}(\vec{r},\vec{r}\,')$ of a spatially homogeneous, unpolarized spin-1/2 superfluid Fermi gas is not the ordinary static BCS theory, but the linearized time-dependent BCS theory implemented via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Indeed, the former completely ignores the acoustic excitation branch - the phonons - of the superfluid, while the latter explicitly takes it into account, as well as the quantum fluctuations induced by the broken-pair continuum. Unlike the first, the second theory (i) reflects the effect of these collective excitations on the system's equation of state, including at zero temperature, (ii) allows the function $g_{\uparrow\downarrow}(\vec{r},\vec{r}\,')$ to go at sufficiently large distances strictly below its asymptotic value $(\rho/2)^2$ where $\rho$ is the gas density, as expected according to the quantum hydrodynamics of Landau and Khalatnikov at low temperatures, and (iii) predicts in the function $g_{\uparrow\uparrow}(\vec{r},\vec{r}\,')$ at short distances subdominant contributions $|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|^2\ln|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|$ in 3D and $|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|^2\ln(-\ln|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|)$ in 2D, alongside the dominant contributions $|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|$ in 3D and $|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|^2\ln|\vec{r}-\vec{r}\,'|$ in 2D already present in static BCS theory but with a lower coefficient. This discussion is relevant to the recent theoretical work of Obeso-Jureidini and Romero-Rochin, and to the ongoing experiments on cold atomic gases at ENS and MIT.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the minimal mean-field theory for the pair distribution functions g_σσ'(r,r') of a spatially homogeneous, unpolarized spin-1/2 superfluid Fermi gas with contact interactions is the linearized time-dependent BCS theory implemented via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, rather than static BCS theory. The latter ignores the acoustic phonon branch and broken-pair continuum, while the former incorporates them, leading to three consequences: (i) collective excitations affect the equation of state even at T=0, (ii) g_↑↓(r,r') falls strictly below (ρ/2)^2 at large separations consistent with Landau-Khalatnikov hydrodynamics, and (iii) g_↑↑(r,r') acquires subdominant short-distance corrections |r-r'|^2 ln|r-r'| (3D) and |r-r'|^2 ln(-ln|r-r'|) (2D) alongside the dominant static-BCS terms but with reduced coefficients.

Significance. If the derivations are sound, the work supplies a concrete, parameter-free improvement within mean-field theory for computing pair correlations that includes the effects of phonons and quantum fluctuations. This is directly relevant to ongoing cold-atom experiments and to recent calculations by Obeso-Jureidini and Romero-Rochin; the explicit short-distance functional forms and the asymptotic undershoot in g_↑↓ constitute falsifiable predictions that could be tested numerically or experimentally.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of short-distance expansion (around Eq. (short-distance forms) and gap equation)] The central claim that linearized TD-BCS plus FDT already encodes the full effect of phonons and broken-pair continuum on g_σσ' without higher-order corrections is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the ultraviolet regularization of the gap equation and the short-distance expansion of g_↑↑(r) remain consistent with the exact Tan contact parameter; any fluctuation-induced shift in the contact would retroactively alter the coefficient of the leading |r| (3D) or |r|^2 ln|r| (2D) term already present in static BCS. No such consistency check is visible in the provided derivations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the three consequences but supplies no explicit equations or numerical checks; the functional forms |r-r'|^2 ln|r-r'| and |r-r'|^2 ln(-ln|r-r'|) cannot be verified from the given text alone.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the pair-distribution functions g_σσ'(r,r') and the density ρ should be introduced with a brief definition in the introduction for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the need for an explicit consistency check with the Tan contact parameter. We address this point below and will revise the manuscript to include the requested demonstration.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that linearized TD-BCS plus FDT already encodes the full effect of phonons and broken-pair continuum on g_σσ' without higher-order corrections is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the ultraviolet regularization of the gap equation and the short-distance expansion of g_↑↑(r) remain consistent with the exact Tan contact parameter; any fluctuation-induced shift in the contact would retroactively alter the coefficient of the leading |r| (3D) or |r|^2 ln|r| (2D) term already present in static BCS. No such consistency check is visible in the provided derivations.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check is warranted. In the linearized TD-BCS framework the gap equation and its ultraviolet regularization are identical to those of static BCS theory, because the time-dependent equations reduce to the static gap equation for the equilibrium order parameter. The Tan contact is therefore unchanged and is fixed by the same high-momentum tail. The additional phonon and broken-pair contributions appear only in sub-dominant terms of the short-distance expansion of g_↑↑(r) (the |r|^2 ln|r| term in 3D and the |r|^2 ln(-ln|r|) term in 2D). We will add a short paragraph (or appendix) that explicitly recomputes the leading coefficient from the gap equation and confirms it matches the static-BCS/Tan expression, thereby verifying that no retroactive shift occurs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard FDT applied to linearized TD-BCS yields independent predictions

full rationale

The paper derives pair distribution functions by applying the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to the linearized time-dependent BCS equations. This explicitly incorporates the acoustic phonon branch and broken-pair continuum, which are absent by definition from static BCS. The resulting subdominant short-distance terms and equation-of-state corrections follow from the fluctuation spectrum rather than from any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the provided claims; the comparison to static BCS rests on the known omission of time dependence, not on a reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to the linearized time-dependent BCS equations for a homogeneous unpolarized Fermi gas and on the assumption that this framework already encodes the acoustic phonon branch and broken-pair continuum.

free parameters (1)
  • superfluid gap parameter
    Determined self-consistently from the contact interaction strength in the underlying BCS theory; its value enters the pair-distribution calculation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The fluctuation-dissipation theorem applies directly to the linearized time-dependent BCS equations
    Invoked to obtain the pair distribution functions from the dynamic response.
  • domain assumption The gas is spatially homogeneous and unpolarized
    Stated explicitly in the abstract as the setting for the calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5669 in / 1500 out tokens · 126175 ms · 2026-05-16T18:22:55.369999+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conclusion générale Nous avons étudié à basse température les fonctions de distribution de paires gσσ′(r, r′) d’un gaz bidimensionnel ou tridimensionnel de fermions de spin 1/2 en interaction de contact, non polarisé et spatialement homogène, dans ce qui nous paraît être la théorie de champ moyen minimale acceptable pour leur calcul, la théorie BCS dépend...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ˜φ(q) − C (q2 + q2 0)2 − Dq (q2 + q2 0)3 # − r 2 6 Z Q 0 q2dq 2π2 q2

    Ensuite, on remarque que le numérateur et le dénominateur de la fraction sous le logarithme dans la définition (190) deF (Z ) sont des carrés, par exemple p 1 − 2Z + iZ = ( p 1 − 2Z + i)2/(2i). Ceci permet d’écrireF (−ϵ) sous la forme F (−ϵ) = π2 2 + iπ £ ln(t + iα) + ln(t − iβ) − ln(t − iα) − ln(t + iβ) ¤ où α = β−1 = p 2 + p 6 2 (206) On ramène donc (20...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. C. Obeso-Jureidini, V . Romero-Rochín, « Density correlation functions and the spatial structure of the two- dimensional BEC-BCS crossover »,Phys. Rev. A105 (2022), p. 043307, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.043307

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.043307 2022

  4. [4]

    J. C. Obeso-Jureidini, V . Romero-Rochín, « Spatial structure of the pair wave function and the density correlation functions throughout the BEC-BCS crossover »,Phys. Rev. A101 (2020), p. 033619, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 101.033619

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2020

  5. [5]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, « Theory of Superconductivity », Phys. Rev. 108 (1957), p. 1175-1204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 1957

  6. [6]

    Bogolioubov, « K teorii sverkhtekuchesti »,Izv

    N. Bogolioubov, « K teorii sverkhtekuchesti »,Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser . Fiz.11 (1947), p. 77, version anglaise « On the theory of superfluidity », J. Phys. (URSS) 11, 23 (1947)

    work page 1947

  7. [7]

    Castin, Condensats de Bose-Einstein – La théorie, des fondements aux applications, Tome II , EDP Sciences/CNRS Éditions, Les Ulis/Paris, 2025

    Y. Castin, Condensats de Bose-Einstein – La théorie, des fondements aux applications, Tome II , EDP Sciences/CNRS Éditions, Les Ulis/Paris, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Penrose, L

    O. Penrose, L. Onsager, « Bose-Einstein Condensation and Liquid Helium », Phys. Rev. 104 (1956), p. 576-584, https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.576

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.104.576 1956

  9. [9]

    Leggett, Quantum Liquids – Bose Condensation and Cooper Pairing in Condensed-Matter Systems, Oxford Univer- sity Press, Oxford, 2006

    A. Leggett, Quantum Liquids – Bose Condensation and Cooper Pairing in Condensed-Matter Systems, Oxford Univer- sity Press, Oxford, 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Kurkjian, Y

    H. Kurkjian, Y. Castin, A. Sinatra, « Phase operators and blurring time of a pair-condensed Fermi gas »,Phys. Rev. A88 (2013), p. 063623, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.063623

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.063623 2013

  11. [11]

    Bogoliubov, V

    N. Bogoliubov, V . Tolmachev, D. Shirkov,New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Académie des Sciences de l’U.R.S.S., Moscou, 1958

    work page 1958

  12. [12]

    P . W . Anderson, « Random-Phase Approximation in the Theory of Superconductivity »,Phys. Rev. 112 (1958), p. 1900- 1916, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1900

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1900 1958

  13. [13]

    Minguzzi, G

    A. Minguzzi, G. Ferrari, Y. Castin, « Dynamic structure factor of a superfluid Fermi gas », The European Physi- cal Journal D - Atomic, Molecular , Optical and Plasma Physics 17 (2001), n o 1, p. 49-55, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s100530170036

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    Kurkjian, Y

    H. Kurkjian, Y. Castin, A. Sinatra, « Brouillage thermique d’un gaz cohérent de fermions », Comptes Rendus Physique 17 (2016), no 7, p. 789-801, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631070516000062, version anglaise « Thermal blurring of a coherent Fermi gas », hal-01118346 v4 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Kurkjian, Cohérence, brouillage et dynamique de phase dans un condensat de paires de fermions , Thèse, ENS - Université PSL, 2016, https://theses.hal.science/tel-01469344

    H. Kurkjian, Cohérence, brouillage et dynamique de phase dans un condensat de paires de fermions , Thèse, ENS - Université PSL, 2016, https://theses.hal.science/tel-01469344

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Carusotto, Y

    I. Carusotto, Y. Castin, « Coherence and correlation properties of a one-dimensional attractive Fermi gas », Optics Communications 243 (2004), p. 81-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2004.04.062

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2004.04.062 2004

  17. [17]

    Gaudin, La fonction d’onde de Bethe, Masson, Paris, 1983

    M. Gaudin, La fonction d’onde de Bethe, Masson, Paris, 1983

    work page 1983

  18. [18]

    Blaizot, G

    J.-P . Blaizot, G. Ripka,Quantum Theory Of Finite Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985. Yvan Castin 53

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Castin, Basic theory tools for degenerate Fermi gases , in Ultra-cold Fermi Gases, Proceedings of the International School of Physics « Enrico Fermi » - Course CLXIV , M

    Y. Castin, Basic theory tools for degenerate Fermi gases , in Ultra-cold Fermi Gases, Proceedings of the International School of Physics « Enrico Fermi » - Course CLXIV , M. Inguscio, W . Ketterle, C. Salomon ed., IOS Press/Società italiana di fisica, Amsterdam/Bologne, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3254/978-1-58603-846-5-289, en accès libre ici

    work page doi:10.3254/978-1-58603-846-5-289 2007

  20. [20]

    C. Mora, Y. Castin, « Extension of Bogoliubov theory to quasicondensates », Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003), p. 053615, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.053615

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.67.053615 2003

  21. [21]

    Marini, F

    M. Marini, F . Pistolesi, G. C. Strinati, « Evolution from BCS superconductivity to Bose condensation : analytic results for the crossover in three dimensions »,The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems1 (1998), no 2, p. 151-159, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050165

    work page doi:10.1007/s100510050165 1998

  22. [22]

    Castin, H

    Y. Castin, H. Kurkjian, « Branche d’excitation collective du continuum dans les gaz de fermions condensés par paires : étude analytique et lois d’échelle », Comptes Rendus. Physique 21 (2020), n o 3 (fr), p. 253-310, https://doi.org/10. 5802/crphys.1, version anglaise « Collective excitation branch in the continuum of pair-condensed Fermi gases: analytica...

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Gradshteyn, I

    I. Gradshteyn, I. Ryzhik, Tables of integrals, series, and products, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994

    work page 1994

  24. [24]

    Randeria, J.-M

    M. Randeria, J.-M. Duan, L.-Y. Shieh, « Superconductivity in a two-dimensional Fermi gas : Evolution from Cooper pairing to Bose condensation », Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990), p. 327-343, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.327

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.327 1990

  25. [25]

    Combescot, M

    R. Combescot, M. Y. Kagan, S. Stringari, « Collective mode of homogeneous superfluid Fermi gases in the BEC-BCS crossover », Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006), p. 042717, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042717

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.74.042717 2006

  26. [26]

    Van Loon, C

    S. Van Loon, C. A. R. Sá de Melo, « Effects of Quantum Fluctuations on the Low-Energy Collective Modes of Two- Dimensional Superfluid Fermi Gases from the BCS to the Bose Limit », Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), p. 113001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.113001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.113001 2023

  27. [27]

    Randeria, Crossover from BCS Theory to Bose-Einstein Condensation , in Bose-Einstein Condensation, A

    M. Randeria, Crossover from BCS Theory to Bose-Einstein Condensation , in Bose-Einstein Condensation, A. Griffin, D.W . Snoke, S. Stringari ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  28. [28]

    D. S. Petrov, C. Salomon, G. V . Shlyapnikov, « Weakly Bound Dimers of Fermionic Atoms »,Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004), p. 090404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.090404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.090404 2004

  29. [29]

    I. V . Brodsky, A. V . Klaptsov, M. Y. Kagan, R. Combescot, X. Leyronas, « Bound states of three and four resonantly interacting particles », Pis’ma v ZhETF82 (2005) (en), p. 306, http://jetpletters.ru/ps/0/article_15608.shtml

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    R. B. Diener, R. Sensarma, M. Randeria, « Quantum fluctuations in the superfluid state of the BCS-BEC crossover », Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008), p. 023626, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023626

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.77.023626 2008

  31. [31]

    Schick, « Two-Dimensional System of Hard-Core Bosons », Phys

    M. Schick, « Two-Dimensional System of Hard-Core Bosons », Phys. Rev. A 3 (1971), p. 1067-1073, https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.3.1067

    work page 1971

  32. [32]

    Popov,Functional Integrals in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983, chap

    V . Popov,Functional Integrals in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983, chap. 6

    work page 1983

  33. [33]

    L. He, H. Lü, G. Cao, H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, « Quantum fluctuations in the BCS-BEC crossover of two-dimensional Fermi gases », Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015), p. 023620, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023620

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.023620 2015

  34. [34]

    C. A. R. Sá de Melo, M. Randeria, J. R. Engelbrecht, « Crossover from BCS to Bose superconductivity : Transition temperature and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory », Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), p. 3202-3205, https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.3202 1993

  35. [35]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifchitz, Physique statistique – Première partie, Éditions Mir, Moscou, 1984

    work page 1984

  36. [36]

    H. B. Callen, T . A. Welton, « Irreversibility and Generalized Noise »,Phys. Rev. 83 (1951), p. 34-40, https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRev.83.34

    work page 1951

  37. [37]

    Lévy, Magnétisme et supraconductivité, InterÉditions/CNRS Éditions, Paris, 1997

    L. Lévy, Magnétisme et supraconductivité, InterÉditions/CNRS Éditions, Paris, 1997

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    Kurkjian, J

    H. Kurkjian, J. Tempere, S. N. Klimin, « Linear response of a superfluid Fermi gas inside its pair-breaking continuum », Scientific Reports 10 (2020), no 1, p. 11591, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65371-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65371-9 2020

  39. [39]

    Castin, « Spectroscopie de Bragg et mode du continuum de paire brisée dans un gaz de fermions superfluide », Comptes Rendus

    Y. Castin, « Spectroscopie de Bragg et mode du continuum de paire brisée dans un gaz de fermions superfluide », Comptes Rendus. Physique21 (2020), no 3 (fr), p. 203-219, https://doi.org/10.5802/crphys.33, version anglaise « Bragg spectroscopy and pair-breaking-continuum mode in a superfluid Fermi gas », hal-02377014 (2020)

    work page doi:10.5802/crphys.33 2020

  40. [40]

    L. He, « Dynamic density and spin responses of a superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS–BEC crossover : Path integral formulation and pair fluctuation theory », Annals of Physics 373 (2016), p. 470-511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2016.07.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop 2016

  41. [41]

    Stenger, S

    J. Stenger, S. Inouye, A. P . Chikkatur, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, D. E. Pritchard, W . Ketterle, « Bragg Spectroscopy of a Bose- Einstein Condensate », Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), p. 4569-4573, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4569

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4569 1999

  42. [42]

    Castin, I

    Y. Castin, I. Ferrier-Barbut, C. Salomon, « La vitesse critique de Landau d’une particule dans un superfluide de fermions », Comptes Rendus. Physique 16 (2015), n o 2 (fr), p. 241-253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2015.01.005, version anglaise « The Landau critical velocity for a particle in a Fermi superfluid », hal-01053706 v3 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2015.01.005 2015

  43. [43]

    S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, H. Kurkjian, « Collective excitations of superfluid Fermi gases near the transition tempera- ture », Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021), p. 043336, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.043336

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.043336 2021

  44. [44]

    Kurkjian, Y

    H. Kurkjian, Y. Castin, A. Sinatra, « Concavity of the collective excitation branch of a Fermi gas in the BEC-BCS crosso- ver », Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016), p. 013623, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.013623, version française : « Concavité de la branche d’excitation collective d’un gaz de fermions dans la zone de raccordement CBE-BCS », hal-01228798 v2 (2...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.013623 2016

  45. [45]

    Hu, X.-J

    H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, P . D. Drummond, « Equation of state of a superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS-BEC crossover », Europhysics Letters 74 (2006), no 4, p. 574, https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2006-10023-y

    work page doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10023-y 2006

  46. [46]

    Fetter, J

    A. Fetter, J. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Dover, Mineola, 2003

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Holzmann, Y

    M. Holzmann, Y. Castin, « Pair correlation function of an inhomogeneous interacting Bose-Einstein condensate », The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular , Optical and Plasma Physics 7 (1999), n o 3, p. 425-432, https: //doi.org/10.1007/s100530050586

    work page doi:10.1007/s100530050586 1999

  48. [48]

    M. A. Escobedo, C. Manuel, « Effective field theory and dispersion law of the phonons of a nonrelativistic superfluid », Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010), p. 023614, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.023614

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.023614 2010

  49. [49]

    Castin, A

    Y. Castin, A. Serafin, A. Sinatra, « Amortissement des phonons dans un superfluide 2D : insuffisance de la règle d’or de Fermi à basse température », Comptes Rendus. Physique 24 (2023), n o S3 (fr), p. 187-239, https://doi.org/ 10.5802/crphys.169, version anglaise « Phonon damping in a 2D superfluid: insufficiency of Fermi’ s golden rule at low temperatur...

    work page doi:10.5802/crphys.169 2023

  50. [50]

    Landau, I

    L. Landau, I. Khalatnikov, « Teoriya vyazkosti Geliya-II », Zh. Eksp. Teor . Fiz.19 (1949), p. 637, version anglaise dans Collected papers of L.D. Landau, chapitre 69, p.494, édité par D. ter Haar (Pergamon, New York, 1965)

    work page 1949

  51. [51]

    Y. Castin, « Questions ouvertes pour les gaz de fermions en interaction forte et de portée nulle/Open questions for strongly interacting Fermi gases with zero-range interactions », Comptes Rendus. Physique 26 (2025) (fr/en), p. 393- 461, https://doi.org/10.5802/crphys.244

    work page doi:10.5802/crphys.244 2025

  52. [52]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, J. Boronat, J. Casulleras, S. Giorgini, « Equation of State of a Fermi Gas in the BEC-BCS Crossover : A Quantum Monte Carlo Study », Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004), p. 200404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93. 200404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93 2004

  53. [53]

    Giorgini , author L

    S. Giorgini, L. P . Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, « Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases »,Rev. Mod. Phys.80 (2008), p. 1215- 1274, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1215

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1215 2008

  54. [54]

    C. Daix, M. Dixmerias, Y.-Y. He, J. Verstraten, T . de Jongh, B. Peaudecerf, S. Zhang, T . Yefsah, « Observing Spatial Charge and Spin Correlations in a Strongly-Interacting Fermi Gas », 13 pages, 11 figures, 2025, https://hal.science/ hal-05046046

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Schirotzek, Y.-i

    A. Schirotzek, Y.-i. Shin, C. H. Schunck, W . Ketterle, « Determination of the Superfluid Gap in Atomic Fermi Gases by Quasiparticle Spectroscopy »,Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008), p. 140403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.140403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.140403 2008

  56. [56]

    M. J. H. Ku, A. T . Sommer, L. W . Cheuk, M. W . Zwierlein, « Revealing the Superfluid Lambda Transition in the Universal Thermodynamics of a Unitary Fermi Gas », Science 335 (2012), n o 6068, p. 563-567, https://www.science.org/doi/ abs/10.1126/science.1214987

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1214987 2012

  57. [57]

    Hadzibabic, S

    Z. Hadzibabic, S. Gupta, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, M. W . Zwierlein, K. Dieckmann, W . Ketterle, « Fiftyfold Impro- vement in the Number of Quantum Degenerate Fermionic Atoms », Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), p. 160401, https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.160401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.160401 2003

  58. [58]

    Nishida, D

    Y. Nishida, D. T . Son, «ϵ Expansion for a Fermi Gas at Infinite Scattering Length »,Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006), p. 050403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.050403 2006

  59. [59]

    R. Yao, S. Chi, M. Wang, R. J. Fletcher, M. Zwierlein, « Measuring Pair Correlations in Bose and Fermi Gases via Atom- Resolved Microscopy »,Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), p. 183402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.183402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.183402 2025

  60. [60]

    M. F . Parsons, A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, D. Greif, M. Greiner, « Site-resolved measurement of the spin-correlation function in the Fermi-Hubbard model », Science 353 (2016), no 6305, p. 1253-1256, https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aag1430, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aag1430

    work page doi:10.1126/science 2016

  61. [62]

    L. W . Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, K. R. Lawrence, M. Okan, H. Zhang, E. Khatami, N. Trivedi, T . Paiva, M. Rigol, M. W . Zwierlein, « Observation of spatial charge and spin correlations in the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model », Science 353 (2016), no 6305, p. 1260-1264, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3349, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.science. org/doi/pdf/10.1...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aag3349 2016

  62. [63]

    Lecomte, A

    J. Verstraten, K. Dai, M. Dixmerias, B. Peaudecerf, T . de Jongh, T . Yefsah, « In Situ Imaging of a Single-Atom Wave Packet in Continuous Space »,Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), p. 083403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134. 083403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134 2025

  63. [64]

    Xiang, E

    J. Xiang, E. Cruz-Colón, C. C. Chua, W . R. Milner, J. de Hond, J. F . Fricke, W . Ketterle, « In Situ Imaging of the Thermal de Broglie Wavelength in an Ultracold Bose Gas », Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), p. 183401, https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.183401

    work page 2025

  64. [65]

    Bertaina, S

    G. Bertaina, S. Giorgini, « BCS-BEC Crossover in a Two-Dimensional Fermi Gas »,Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011), p. 110403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.110403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.110403 2011

  65. [66]

    H. Shi, S. Chiesa, S. Zhang, « Ground-state properties of strongly interacting Fermi gases in two dimensions », Phys. Rev. A 92 (2015), p. 033603, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.033603

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.033603 2015

  66. [67]

    Boettcher, L

    I. Boettcher, L. Bayha, D. Kedar, P . A. Murthy, M. Neidig, M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Zürn, S. Jochim, T . Enss, Yvan Castin 55 « Equation of State of Ultracold Fermions in the 2D BEC-BCS Crossover Region »,Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016), p. 045303, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.045303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.045303 2016

  67. [68]

    Werner, Y

    F . Werner, Y. Castin, « General relations for quantum gases in two and three dimensions : Two-component fermions », Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012), p. 013626, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.013626

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013626 2012

  68. [69]

    Olshanii, V

    M. Olshanii, V . Dunjko, « Short-Distance Correlation Properties of the Lieb-Liniger System and Momentum Distri- butions of Trapped One-Dimensional Atomic Gases », Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), p. 090401, https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.090401

    work page 2003

  69. [70]

    Tan, « Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas »,Annals of Physics 323 (2008), no 12, p

    S. Tan, « Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas »,Annals of Physics 323 (2008), no 12, p. 2971-2986, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2008.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.03.005 2008

  70. [71]

    Pitaevskii, S

    L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016

    work page 2016

  71. [72]

    I. V . Brodsky, A. V . Klaptsov, M. Y. Kagan, R. Combescot, X. Leyronas, « Bound states of three and four resonantly interacting particles », Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 82 (2005), n o 5, p. 273-278, https: //doi.org/10.1134/1.2130911

    work page doi:10.1134/1.2130911 2005