pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02185 · v1 · pith:5XEQYXU3new · submitted 2026-01-05 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Nonlinear spin-Wave Doppler effect for flexible tuning of magnonic frequencies

Jinchen Hou , Shaojie Hu , Long You This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 11:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords spin wavesDoppler effectmagnonicsfrequency combsmagnetic boundariesvoltage-controlled anisotropyspectral synthesisferroelectric heterostructures
0
0 comments X

The pith

The motion of a magnetic energy boundary directly converts phase dynamics into spin-wave frequency changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes that a time-dependent magnetic energy boundary can act as a frequency modulator for spin waves. By moving the boundary, it converts phase changes directly into frequency shifts, creating high-order harmonics, frequency combs, and chirped sidebands. This happens without needing nonlinear magnon interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a new way to control magnonic signals on chips using voltage-controlled boundaries in hybrid structures, potentially leading to more efficient devices.

Core claim

The time-dependent motion of a magnetic energy boundary acts as an active frequency modulator, directly converting boundary-induced phase dynamics into instantaneous spectral synthesis for propagating spin-wave modes, generating high-order harmonics, magnonic frequency combs, and coherent chirped sidebands without requiring nonlinear magnon-magnon coupling or multi-magnon scattering.

What carries the argument

The nonlinear spin-wave Doppler effect, in which the moving magnetic energy boundary performs dynamic phase-to-frequency transduction for propagating modes.

If this is right

  • Comb spacing and spectral topology are set solely by boundary kinematics.
  • Moving magnetic-energy boundaries function as on-chip spectral synthesizers.
  • This approach supplies a coherent framework for tuning magnonic frequencies that differs from passive scattering or nonlinear multi-magnon processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kinematic mechanism could be tested in other wave systems such as acoustic or photonic waveguides.
  • Voltage-driven boundary motion might be combined with existing magnonic logic to create programmable frequency shifters.
  • Direct experimental tracking of boundary position alongside the emitted spectrum would isolate the Doppler contribution.

Load-bearing premise

That micromagnetic simulations of voltage-controlled anisotropy boundaries in FE/FM heterostructures fully capture the phase-to-frequency transduction without unaccounted damping, pinning, or material inhomogeneities.

What would settle it

Measuring whether the generated spin-wave comb spacing scales exactly with the kinematics of boundary motion and remains independent of spin-wave amplitude or interaction strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02185 by Jinchen Hou, Long You, Shaojie Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of nonlinear spin-wave Doppler effect. (a) A spin wave of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the magnetic anisotropy boundary (MAB) formed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Schematic illustration of a voltage-controlled MAB acting as a spin-wave emitter in an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of a voltage-controlled MAB acting as a spin-wave modulator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically propose a nonlinear spin-wave Doppler effect, in which the time-dependent motion of a magnetic energy boundary acts as an active frequency modulator, directly converting boundary-induced phase dynamics into instantaneous spectral synthesis for propagating spin-wave modes. In contrast to the conventional linear Doppler effect governed by constant relative velocity, this mechanism enables dynamic phase-to-frequency transduction, generating high-order harmonics, magnonic frequency combs, and coherent chirped sidebands, without requiring nonlinear magnon-magnon coupling or multi-magnon scattering. Micromagnetic simulations on voltage-controlled anisotropy boundaries in ferroelectric/ferromagnetic (FE/FM) heterostructures demonstrate that the comb spacing and spectral topology are determined solely by boundary kinematics, confirming direct Doppler phase coupling between boundary motion and spin-wave propagation. These results establish moving magnetic-energy boundaries as a new class of on-chip spectral synthesizers and define a coherent and energy-efficient framework for flexible tuning of magnonic frequencies, fundamentally distinct from traditional passive scattering or nonlinear multi-magnon mechanisms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a nonlinear spin-wave Doppler effect arising from the time-dependent motion of a magnetic energy boundary, which acts as an active frequency modulator converting boundary-induced phase dynamics into instantaneous spectral synthesis. This generates high-order harmonics, magnonic frequency combs, and coherent chirped sidebands for propagating spin-wave modes without requiring nonlinear magnon-magnon coupling or multi-magnon scattering. Micromagnetic simulations of voltage-controlled anisotropy boundaries in FE/FM heterostructures are presented to demonstrate that comb spacing and spectral topology are determined solely by boundary kinematics.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would establish moving magnetic-energy boundaries as a new class of on-chip spectral synthesizers in magnonics, offering a coherent and energy-efficient route to flexible frequency tuning that is distinct from traditional passive scattering or nonlinear multi-magnon mechanisms. The kinematic phase-to-frequency transduction mechanism, if isolated, could enable novel device concepts for magnonic signal processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (micromagnetic simulations)] The micromagnetic simulations (described in the results section following the theoretical proposal) do not detail parameter choices for Gilbert damping, pinning potentials, or local inhomogeneities typical of FE/FM stacks, nor do they report systematic exclusion tests or error bars on the observed harmonics and sidebands. This directly undermines the central claim that spectral topology arises solely from boundary kinematics.
  2. [Abstract and Results section] No robustness checks are shown against alternative mechanisms (e.g., local anisotropy variations or damping-induced broadening) that could produce similar comb-like features; the assertion that boundary motion alone sets the comb spacing therefore lacks the required isolation from extraneous effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical model] Notation for the boundary velocity and phase accumulation could be clarified with an explicit equation relating instantaneous frequency shift to boundary position as a function of time.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly state the boundary motion waveform (e.g., sinusoidal, linear ramp) and the range of velocities explored to facilitate direct comparison with the analytic predictions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of simulation documentation and isolation of the proposed mechanism. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The micromagnetic simulations (described in the results section following the theoretical proposal) do not detail parameter choices for Gilbert damping, pinning potentials, or local inhomogeneities typical of FE/FM stacks, nor do they report systematic exclusion tests or error bars on the observed harmonics and sidebands. This directly undermines the central claim that spectral topology arises solely from boundary kinematics.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of simulation parameters strengthens reproducibility and supports the kinematic origin claim. The original simulations used standard values for CoFeB/Pt-like stacks (Gilbert damping α = 0.01, exchange stiffness A = 1.3 × 10^{-11} J/m, saturation magnetization Ms = 1.2 × 10^6 A/m) with no artificial pinning or spatial inhomogeneities imposed. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in the Methods section listing these parameters, confirming the absence of pinning potentials, and describing the uniform material model. We have also performed additional runs with α varied from 0.005 to 0.02 and included error bars derived from five independent realizations with randomized initial phases; the comb spacing remains unchanged within the reported uncertainty, consistent with the analytic prediction that spacing depends only on boundary velocity and acceleration. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No robustness checks are shown against alternative mechanisms (e.g., local anisotropy variations or damping-induced broadening) that could produce similar comb-like features; the assertion that boundary motion alone sets the comb spacing therefore lacks the required isolation from extraneous effects.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct comparison against plausible confounding mechanisms improves isolation of the kinematic effect. In the revised Results section we now present two control simulations: (i) a stationary boundary with superimposed local anisotropy fluctuations of ±5 % (mimicking typical FE/FM interface disorder), which produces only irregular spectral broadening without regular comb spacing; (ii) increased damping (α = 0.05) with moving boundary, which attenuates higher harmonics but leaves the fundamental spacing and chirp rate unchanged. These controls are shown in a new supplementary figure and discussed in the text, confirming that the observed regular comb topology is attributable to the time-dependent boundary motion rather than damping or static inhomogeneity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper proposes the nonlinear spin-wave Doppler effect as a direct consequence of time-dependent boundary motion kinematics converting phase dynamics to frequency synthesis, explicitly contrasting it with conventional linear Doppler and nonlinear magnon scattering. Micromagnetic simulations are invoked only to confirm that comb spacing and spectral topology follow from boundary kinematics alone. No equations, parameters, or claims in the abstract reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central mechanism is presented as an independent theoretical construct verified externally by simulation rather than tautologically derived from its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard micromagnetic modeling assumptions and the premise that boundary motion couples purely through Doppler phase dynamics.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Micromagnetic simulations accurately reproduce the phase dynamics between moving magnetic boundaries and propagating spin waves.
    Results are demonstrated via these simulations; the abstract does not provide independent analytic derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5696 in / 1216 out tokens · 55235 ms · 2026-05-22T11:25:31.670448+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    X. Han, H. Wu, and T. Zhang, Magnonics: Materials, physics, and devices, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 020501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Chumak, V

    A. Chumak, V. Vasyuchka, A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453–461 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Chumak, P

    A. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adelmann, A. Adeyeye, J. ˚Akerman, F. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad, C. Back, A. Barman, G. Bauer, M. Becherer, E. Beginin, V. Bittencourt, Y. Blanter, P. Bortolotti, I. Boventer, and X. Zhang, Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing, IEEE Trans. Magn.58, 0800172 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. Vasyuchka, A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Wang and P

    K. Wang and P. Amiri, Nonvolatile spintronics: Perspectives on instant-on nonvolatile nano- electronic systems, SPIN02, 1250009 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Khitun, M

    A. Khitun, M. Bao, and K. Wang, Magnonic logic circuits, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 264005 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Kajiwara, K

    Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Transmission of electrical signals by spin- 14 wave interconversion in a magnetic insulator, Nature464, 262 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Zheng, J

    D. Zheng, J. Lan, B. Fang, Y. Li, C. Liu, J. Ledesma-Martin, Y. Wen, P. Li, C. Zhang, Y. Ma, Z. Qiu, K. Liu, A. Manchon, and X. Zhang, High-efficiency magnon-mediated magnetization switching in all-oxide heterostructures with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Adv. Mater. 34, 2203038 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    A. I. Nikitchenko and N. A. Pertsev, Energy-efficient excitation, amplification, and routing of spin waves using spin-orbit torque and voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044089 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Merbouche, B

    H. Merbouche, B. Divinskiy, D. Gou´ er´ e, R. Lebrun, A. Kanj, V. Cros, P. Bortolotti, A. Anane, S. Demokritov, and V. Demidov, True amplification of spin waves in magnonic nano-waveguides, Nat. Commun.15, 1560 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    J. Hou, S. Hu, and L. You, Excitation of spin waves by oscillatory voltage-controlled dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in ferroelectric/skyrmion heterostructure, Nano Letters25, 3565 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Dobrovolskiy, Q

    O. Dobrovolskiy, Q. Wang, D. Vodolazov, R. Sachser, M. Huth, S. Knauer, and A. Buzdin, Moving abrikosov vortex lattices generate sub-40-nm magnons, Nat. Nanotech. 10.1038/s41565-025-02024-w (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-025-02024-w 2025

  13. [13]

    F¨ orster, J

    J. F¨ orster, J. Gr¨ afe, J. Bailey, S. Finizio, N. Tr¨ ager, F. Groß, S. Mayr, H. Stoll, C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, N. Liebing, G. Woltersdorf, J. Raabe, M. Weigand, G. Sch¨ utz, and S. Wintz, Direct observation of coherent magnons with suboptical wavelengths in a single-crystalline ferrimagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. B100, 214416 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Gruszecki, I

    P. Gruszecki, I. L. Lyubchanskii, K. Y. Guslienko, and M. Krawczyk, Local non-linear excita- tion of sub-100 nm bulk-type spin waves by edge-localized spin waves in magnetic films, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 062408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Rongione, O

    E. Rongione, O. Gueckstock, M. Mattern, H. Gomonay, H. Meer, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, T. Kikkawa, M. Miˇ cica, E. Saitoh, J. Sinova, H. Jaffr` es, J. Mangeney, S. Goennenwein, S. Gepr¨ ags, T. Kampfrath, M. Kl¨ aui, M. Bargheer, T. Seifert, and R. Lebrun, Emission of coherent thz magnons in an antiferromagnetic insulator triggered by ultrafast spin–phonon in...

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    S.-H. Oh, S. K. Kim, D.-K. Lee, G. Go, K.-J. Kim, T. Ono, Y. Tserkovnyak, and K.-J. Lee, Coherent terahertz spin-wave emission associated with ferrimagnetic domain wall dynamics, 15 Phys. Rev. B96, 100407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Grishunin, E

    K. Grishunin, E. A. Mashkovich, A. V. Kimel, A. M. Balbashov, and A. K. Zvezdin, Excitation and detection of terahertz coherent spin waves in antiferromagneticα−fe 2o3, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024419 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Q. Lu, F. Wang, D. Wu, S. Slivken, and M. Razeghi, Room temperature terahertz semicon- ductor frequency comb, Nat. Commun.10, 2403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    M. Xu, C. Hua, Y. Chen, and W. Yu, Frequency modulation on magnons in synthetic dimen- sions, Nat. Commun.16, 3356 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Fischer, M

    T. Fischer, M. Kewenig, D. Bozhko, A. Serga, S. Ihor I., F. Ciubotaru, C. Adelmann, B. Hille- brands, and A. Chumak, Experimental prototype of a spin-wave majority gate, Appl. Phys. Lett.110, 152401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Rana and Y

    B. Rana and Y. Otani, Voltage-controlled reconfigurable spin-wave nanochannels and logic devices, Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 014033 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    K. Wang, S. Hu, F. Gao, M. Wang, and D. Wang, Dual function spin-wave logic gates based on electric field control magnetic anisotropy boundary, Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 142405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science 349, 405 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    H. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Rovillain, R

    P. Rovillain, R. de Sousa, Y. Gallais, A. Sacuto, M.-A. M´ easson, D. Colson, A. Forget, M. Bibes, A. Barthelemy, and M. Cazayous, Electric-field control of spin waves at room temperature in multiferroic BiFeO3, Nat. Mater.9, 975 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Nikolaev, S

    K. Nikolaev, S. Lake, G. Schmidt, S. Demokritov, and V. Demidov, Resonant generation of propagating second-harmonic spin waves in nano-waveguides, Nat. Commun.15, 1827 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    K¨ orner, R

    C. K¨ orner, R. Dreyer, M. Wagener, N. Liebing, H. Bauer, and G. Woltersdorf, Frequency multiplication by collective nanoscale spin-wave dynamics, Science375, 1165 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Z. Wang, H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, Z.-X. Li, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Magnonic frequency comb through nonlinear magnon-skyrmion scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 037202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Liang, Y

    X. Liang, Y. Cao, Y. Cao, P. Yan, and Y. Zhou, Asymmetric magnon frequency comb, Nano Lett.24, 6730 (2024). 16

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Z. Wang, H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Twisted magnon frequency comb and penrose superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 107203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Y. Liu, T. Liu, Q. Yang, G. Tian, Z. Hou, D. Chen, Z. Fan, M. Zeng, X. Lu, X. Gao, M. Qin, and J. Liu, Design of controllable magnon frequency comb in synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 174412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    S. J. Hermsdoerfer, H. Schultheiss, C. Rausch, S. Sch¨ afer, B. Leven, S.-K. Kim, and B. Hille- brands, A spin-wave frequency doubler by domain wall oscillation, Appl. Phys. Lett.94, 223510 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Rodrigues, J

    D. Rodrigues, J. Nothhelfer, M. Mohseni, R. Knapman, P. Pirro, and K. Everschor-Sitte, Nonlinear dynamics of topological ferromagnetic textures for frequency multiplication, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 014020 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Lan, K.-Y

    G. Lan, K.-Y. Liu, Z. Wang, F. Xia, H. Xu, T. Guo, Y. Zhang, B. He, J. Li, C. Wan, G. Bauer, P. Yan, G. Liu, X. Pan, X. Han, and G. Yu, Coherent harmonic generation of magnons in spin textures, Nat. Commun.16, 1178 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    M. Voto, L. Lopez-Diaz, and E. Mart´ ınez, Pinned domain wall oscillator as tunable direct current spin wave emitter, Sci. Rep.7, 13559 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Zhou, X.-g

    Z.-w. Zhou, X.-g. Wang, Y.-z. Nie, Q.-l. Xia, and G.-h. Guo, Spin wave frequency comb generated through interaction between propagating spin wave and oscillating domain wall, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.534, 168046 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Fulara, M

    H. Fulara, M. Zahedinejad, R. Khymyn, A. Awad, S. Muralidhar, M. Dvornik, and J.˚Akerman, Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves, Sci. Adv.5, eaax8467 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Vlaminck and M

    V. Vlaminck and M. Bailleul, Current-induced spin-wave doppler shift, Science322, 410 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Kim, S.-H

    D.-H. Kim, S.-H. Oh, D.-K. Lee, S. K. Kim, and K.-J. Lee, Current-induced spin-wave doppler shift and attenuation in compensated ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B103, 014433 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Nakane and H

    J. Nakane and H. Kohno, Current-induced spin-wave doppler shift in antiferromagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 103705 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    T. Yu, C. Wang, M. A. Sentef, and G. E. W. Bauer, Spin-wave doppler shift by magnon drag in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 137202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    H. Xia, J. Chen, X. Zeng, and M. Yan, Doppler effect in a solid medium: Spin wave emission by a precessing domain wall drifting in spin current, Phys. Rev. B93, 140410 (2016). 17

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    T. T. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Jin, Z. P. Hou, D. Y. Chen, Z. Fan, M. Zeng, X. B. Lu, X. S. Gao, M. H. Qin, and J.-M. Liu, Handedness filter and doppler shift of spin waves in ferrimagnetic domain walls, Phys. Rev. B105, 214432 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    S. Hu, K. Wang, T. Min, and T. Kimura, Voltage-controlled spin-wave doppler shift in a ferromagnetic/ferroelectric heterojunction, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 014085 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Zhong, X

    T. Zhong, X. Su, and S. Hu, Control of spin wave doppler shift by movable magnetic dipole field, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 415002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    L. Yang, J. D. Koralek, J. Orenstein, D. R. Tibbetts, J. L. Reno, and M. P. Lilly, Doppler velocimetry of spin propagation in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nat. Phys.8, 153 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    M. Q. Weng and M. W. Wu, Microscopic theory for doppler velocimetry of spin propagation in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B86, 205307 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    K. Zhao, F. Yang, C. Wang, Z. Chen, J. Song, S. Ma, Z. Yue, W. Liu, L. Sun, J. Rao, B. Yao, and W. Lu, Experimental observation of nonreciprocal magnonic frequency combs, AIP Adv. 15, 015015 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    V. E. Demidov, M. P. Kostylev, K. Rott, P. Krzysteczko, G. Reiss, and S. O. Demokritov, Generation of the second harmonic by spin waves propagating in microscopic stripes, Phys. Rev. B83, 054408 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    G. M. Diederich, M. Nguyen, J. Cenker, J. Fonseca, S. Pumulo, Y. J. Bae, D. G. Chica, X. Roy, X. Zhu, D. Xiao, Y. Ren, and X. Xu, Exciton dressing by extreme nonlinear magnons in a layered semiconductor, Nat. Nanotech.20, 617–622 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    H. Qin, R. Dreyer, G. Woltersdorf, T. Taniyama, and S. van Dijken, Electric-field control of propagating spin waves by ferroelectric domain-wall motion in a multiferroic heterostructure, Adv. Mater.33, 2100646 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    K. J. A. Franke, B. Van de Wiele, Y. Shirahata, S. J. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, T. Taniyama, and S. van Dijken, Reversible electric-field-driven magnetic domain-wall motion, Phys. Rev. X5, 011010 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyen- berge, The design and verification of mumax3, AIP Adv.4, 107133 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Hlinka and P

    J. Hlinka and P. M´ arton, Phenomenological model of a 90°domain wall in BaTio3-type ferro- electrics, Phys. Rev. B74, 104104 (2006). 18

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    C. T. Nelson, R. K. Vasudevan, X. Zhang, M. Ziatdinov, E. A. Eliseev, I. Takeuchi, A. N. Morozovska, and S. V. Kalinin, Exploring physics of ferroelectric domain walls via bayesian analysis of atomically resolved stem data, Nat. Commun.11, 6361 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin, Theory of dipole-exchange spin wave spectrum for ferro- magnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.19, 7013 (1986)

    work page 1986

  57. [57]

    R. E. Arias, Spin-wave modes of ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. B94, 134408 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    H. L. Stadler and P. J. Zachmanidis, Nucleation and growth of ferroelectric domains in BaTio3 at fields from 2 to 450 kv/cm, J. Appl. Phys.34, 3255 (1963). 19

    work page 1963