pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.04006 · v2 · pith:ZHSES4HWnew · submitted 2026-01-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Anomalous minimization for critical velocity of superflow along a step potential

Akihiro Kanjo , Hiromitsu Takeuchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords superfluid critical velocityBose-Einstein condensatestep potentialBogoliubov theorylocal condensationphase transitionsuperflowfinite-size scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superflow critical velocity reaches zero when step potential height equals the chemical potential at a local condensation transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a simplified step-potential model to explain the anomalous drop in critical velocity for superflow in a moving obstacle within a Bose-Einstein condensate. The authors apply semi-classical Bogoliubov theory to show that the lowest-energy excitations lead to a minimized critical velocity that vanishes exactly when the potential height matches the hydrostatic chemical potential. This condition marks the critical point for a local condensation phase transition inside the potential region. In finite systems the critical velocity follows a power-law scaling with system size, matching experimental observations of minimum critical velocities.

Core claim

The critical velocity is minimized and becomes zero when the potential height equals the hydrostatic chemical potential, which corresponds to the critical point of the local condensation phase transition inside the step potential. In a finite-size system, the critical velocity v_c obeys a power-law scaling with the system size L_x as v_c proportional to L_x to the power of -0.963.

What carries the argument

Semi-classical analysis based on Bogoliubov theory for the energy spectrum and wave functions of lowest-energy excitations in the step-potential geometry.

If this is right

  • The minimum critical velocity vanishes at the local condensation critical point.
  • Finite-size scaling of critical velocity follows v_c proportional to L_x to the power of approximately -0.96.
  • The step-potential model accounts for the power-law dependence seen in obstacle experiments.
  • The mechanism originates from the phase transition inside the potential region rather than bulk flow properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tuning the potential height near the chemical potential could allow experimental control over the onset of dissipation in superflows.
  • Similar local transitions may appear in other smooth or stepped potentials used in quantum fluid experiments.
  • The scaling exponent might be tested in larger systems to see if it approaches a specific theoretical value in the thermodynamic limit.

Load-bearing premise

The energy spectrum and wave functions of the lowest-energy excitations are well described by the semi-classical analysis based on the Bogoliubov theory in this step-potential geometry.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of whether the critical velocity reaches exactly zero when the step height is tuned to equal the chemical potential in a Bose-Einstein condensate experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04006 by Akihiro Kanjo, Hiromitsu Takeuchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of our system with a step poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dispersion relations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Typical profiles of the wave functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between the inner mode and interface mode within the semi-classical theory. The top and middle panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Theoretical dispersion relations in an infinite system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Critical velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

To reveal a microscopic mechanism for the anomalous minimization and dependence of the superfluid critical velocity on a moving obstacle potential in a atomic Bose-Einstein condensate [\href{https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.053615}{Phys.~Rev.~A \textbf{91}, 053615 (2015)}], we introduce a considerably simplified model of superflow along a step potential. The energy spectrum and wave functions of the lowest-energy excitations in this system are well described by the semi-classical analysis based on the Bogoliubov theory. We found that the critical velocity is minimized and becomes zero when the potential height equals the hydrostatic chemical potential, which corresponds to the critical point of the local condensation phase transition inside the step potential. In a finite-size system, the critical velocity $v_\mathrm{c}$ obeys a power-law scaling with the system size $L_x$ as $v_\mathrm{c}\propto L_x^{-0.963}$. This criticality provides an explanation of the power-law scaling of the minimum critical velocity observed in the experiment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a simplified model of superflow along a step potential in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate to explain the anomalous minimization of critical velocity for a moving obstacle. Using semi-classical analysis based on Bogoliubov theory, the authors claim that the energy spectrum and wave functions of the lowest-energy excitations are accurately described, that the critical velocity vc is minimized and reaches zero exactly when the step height V equals the hydrostatic chemical potential μ (corresponding to the local condensation critical point inside the step), and that in finite-size systems vc obeys a power-law scaling vc ∝ Lx^{-0.963} that accounts for experimental observations.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a microscopic mechanism linking critical-velocity minimization in superfluids to a local phase-transition threshold, offering a potential explanation for power-law scaling of minimum critical velocities in finite trapped systems. This could aid interpretation of experiments on superflow breakdown in inhomogeneous potentials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the semi-classical Bogoliubov analysis 'well describes' the spectrum and wave functions at V=μ is load-bearing for the zero-velocity result, yet at this point the local effective chemical potential vanishes, equilibrium density →0, and relative density fluctuations diverge. This regime challenges the dilute-gas mean-field assumption and the validity of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes linearization plus WKB-like treatment of excitations; explicit checks or error estimates for the low-energy modes in this limit are needed to support the conclusion that vc=0 exactly at the local critical point.
  2. [finite-size scaling] The finite-size scaling section: The reported exponent -0.963 for vc ∝ Lx^{-0.963} is stated to come from the model; if obtained by fitting data generated within the same semi-classical spectrum (rather than from a parameter-free analytic derivation), this introduces moderate circularity when the scaling is invoked to explain the experimental power-law behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit figure or table showing the excitation energy versus velocity or versus V near the V=μ point to illustrate the claimed minimization.
  2. Notation for the step potential and the definition of the local chemical potential should be introduced with an equation early in the text for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the semi-classical Bogoliubov analysis 'well describes' the spectrum and wave functions at V=μ is load-bearing for the zero-velocity result, yet at this point the local effective chemical potential vanishes, equilibrium density →0, and relative density fluctuations diverge. This regime challenges the dilute-gas mean-field assumption and the validity of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes linearization plus WKB-like treatment of excitations; explicit checks or error estimates for the low-energy modes in this limit are needed to support the conclusion that vc=0 exactly at the local critical point.

    Authors: We agree that the regime V=μ is delicate because the local chemical potential vanishes and relative fluctuations diverge, potentially straining the dilute-gas Bogoliubov assumptions. In the manuscript the semi-classical results are cross-checked against numerical diagonalization of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations for the lowest modes; the agreement remains good for the excitation energies that determine vc. To strengthen the claim we will add a dedicated paragraph with quantitative relative-error estimates for the lowest mode as V approaches μ, together with a brief discussion of the range of validity of the linearization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [finite-size scaling] The finite-size scaling section: The reported exponent -0.963 for vc ∝ Lx^{-0.963} is stated to come from the model; if obtained by fitting data generated within the same semi-classical spectrum (rather than from a parameter-free analytic derivation), this introduces moderate circularity when the scaling is invoked to explain the experimental power-law behavior.

    Authors: The exponent is indeed extracted by a numerical power-law fit to vc(Lx) values computed from the semi-classical spectrum. We acknowledge that this procedure is internal to the model and therefore the link to experiment is model-dependent rather than an independent analytic prediction. Nevertheless the spectrum itself follows directly from Bogoliubov theory with no adjustable parameters other than geometry, so the resulting scaling still supplies a concrete microscopic mechanism. In the revision we will clarify that the exponent is a numerical outcome of the model and will add a short discussion of its sensitivity to the fitting range. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained via standard semi-classical Bogoliubov analysis

full rationale

The paper introduces a step-potential model and applies the established semi-classical analysis based on Bogoliubov theory to obtain the energy spectrum and wave functions of lowest-energy excitations. The central result—that critical velocity minimizes to zero when step height equals hydrostatic chemical potential, coinciding with the local condensation critical point—follows directly from that spectrum under the Landau criterion or equivalent excitation analysis, without the target quantity being used to define the inputs. The reported finite-size scaling vc ∝ Lx^{-0.963} is an outcome of explicit calculations across system sizes within the same framework. No self-definitional reduction, fitted parameter renamed as independent prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain appears in the derivation; the approach remains externally grounded in standard Bogoliubov-de Gennes linearization and is not equivalent to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of Bogoliubov theory to the lowest excitations and on the identification of the step height with the local chemical potential as the condensation threshold. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • scaling exponent = -0.963
    The reported value -0.963 is obtained from finite-size analysis and functions as a fitted or numerically extracted parameter for the power-law dependence.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semi-classical Bogoliubov theory accurately captures the lowest-energy excitations in the step-potential geometry
    Invoked to describe the energy spectrum and wave functions without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1368 out tokens · 43940 ms · 2026-05-22T12:45:16.501570+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Critical speed of a binary superfluid of light

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The critical speed of a 2D binary superfluid of light is set by the lowest Landau velocity of density and spin Bogoliubov modes or by strong ellipticity of the hydrodynamic equations, with breakdown initiated by vorte...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Superfluidity(Oxford University Press, 2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    L. D. Landau, Theory of the Superfluidity of Helium II, J. Phys. (USSR)5, 71 (1941)

    work page 1941

  3. [3]

    R. P. Feynman and M. Cohen, Energy Spectrum of the Excitations in Liquid Helium, Phys. Rev.102, 1189 (1956)

    work page 1956

  4. [4]

    R. P. Feynman, Application of Quantum Mechanics to Liquid Helium, inProgress in Low Temperature Physics, Vol. 1, edited by C. J. Gorter (Elsevier, New York, 1955) Chap. 2, pp. 17–53

    work page 1955

  5. [5]

    P. W. Anderson, Considerations on the Flow of Super- fluid Helium, Rev. Mod. Phys.38, 298 (1966)

    work page 1966

  6. [6]

    R. J. Donnelly,Quantized Vortices in Helium II, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR)11, 23 (1947)

    work page 1947

  8. [8]

    Raman, M

    C. Raman, M. K¨ ohl, R. Onofrio, D. S. Durfee, C. E. Kuklewicz, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Evidence for a Critical Velocity in a Bose-Einstein Condensed Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2502 (1999)

    work page 1999

  9. [9]

    Onofrio, C

    R. Onofrio, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Super- fluid Flow in a Bose-Einstein Condensed Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2228 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Inouye, S

    S. Inouye, S. Gupta, T. Rosenband, A. P. Chikkatur, A. G¨ orlitz, T. L. Gustavson, A. E. Leanhardt, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Vortex Phase Singularities in Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 080402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    T. W. Neely, E. C. Samson, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Observation of Vortex Dipoles in an Oblate Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 160401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Desbuquois, L

    R. Desbuquois, L. Chomaz, T. Yefsah, J. L´ eonard, J. Beugnon, C. Weitenberg, and J. Dalibard, Superfluid behaviour of a two-dimensional Bose gas, Nature Physics 8, 645 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    W. J. Kwon, G. Moon, J.-y. Choi, S. W. Seo, and Y.-i. Shin, Relaxation of superfluid turbulence in highly oblate Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A90, 063627 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    W. J. Kwon, J. H. Kim, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, Obser- vation of von K´ arm´ an Vortex Street in an Atomic Super- fluid Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 245301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Frisch, Y

    T. Frisch, Y. Pomeau, and S. Rica, Transition to dissipa- tion in a model of superflow, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1644 (1992)

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    Huepe and M.-E

    C. Huepe and M.-E. Brachet, Scaling laws for vortical nucleation solutions in a model of superflow, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena140, 126 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    Rica, A remark on the critical speed for vortex nucle- ation in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena148, 221 (2001)

    S. Rica, A remark on the critical speed for vortex nucle- ation in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena148, 221 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Aftalion, Q

    A. Aftalion, Q. Du, and Y. Pomeau, Dissipative Flow and Vortex Shedding in the Painlev´ e Boundary Layer of a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 090407 (2003)

    work page 2003

  19. [19]

    C.-T. Pham, C. Nore, and M.-E. Brachet, Boundary lay- ers and emitted excitations in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger su- perflow past a disk, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 210, 203 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    Pinsker and N

    F. Pinsker and N. G. Berloff, Transitions and excitations in a superfluid stream passing small impurities, Phys. Rev. A89, 053605 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Kunimi and Y

    M. Kunimi and Y. Kato, Metastability, excitations, fluc- tuations, and multiple-swallowtail structures of a super- fluid in a Bose-Einstein condensate in the presence of a uniformly moving defect, Phys. Rev. A91, 053608 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Kiehn, V

    H. Kiehn, V. P. Singh, and L. Mathey, Superfluidity of a laser-stirred Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043317 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    H. Kwak, J. H. Jung, and Y. Shin, Minimum critical velocity of a Gaussian obstacle in a Bose-Einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. A107, 023310 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Huynh, F

    J. Huynh, F. H´ ebert, M. Albert, and P.-E. Larr´ e, Criti- cal velocity of a two-dimensional superflow past a poten- tial barrier of arbitrary penetrability, Phys. Rev. A109, 013317 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    M. T. M. Christenhusz, A. Safavi-Naini, H. Rubinsztein- Dunlop, T. W. Neely, and M. T. Reeves, Emergent Uni- versal Drag Law in a Model of Superflow, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066001 (2025). 9

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    W. J. Kwon, G. Moon, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, Critical velocity for vortex shedding in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A91, 053615 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Hakim, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger flow past an obstacle in one dimension, Phys

    V. Hakim, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger flow past an obstacle in one dimension, Phys. Rev. E55, 2835 (1997)

    work page 1997

  28. [28]

    Albert, T

    M. Albert, T. Paul, N. Pavloff, and P. Leboeuf, Dipole Oscillations of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in the Pres- ence of Defects and Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 250405 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Huynh, M

    J. Huynh, M. Albert, and P.-E. Larr´ e, Critical velocity for superfluidity in the one-dimensional mean-field regime: From matter to light quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. A105, 023305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Exact Solution of Bogoliubov Equations for Bosons in One-Dimensional Piecewise Constant Potential

    D. Takahashi, Exact Solution of Bogoliubov Equa- tions for Bosons in One-Dimensional Piecewise Constant Potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.1068 10.48550/arXiv.0909.1068 (2009)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0909.1068 2009

  31. [31]

    Watanabe, F

    G. Watanabe, F. Dalfovo, F. Piazza, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Critical velocity of superfluid flow through single-barrier and periodic potentials, Phys. Rev. A80, 053602 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Paris-Mandoki, J

    A. Paris-Mandoki, J. Shearring, F. Mancarella, T. Fromhold, A. Trombettoni, and P. Kr¨ uger, Su- perfluid flow above the critical velocity, Scientific Reports7, 9070 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Huynh, F

    J. Huynh, F. H´ ebert, P.-E. Larr´ e, and M. Albert, Sta- tionary transport above the critical velocity in a one- dimensional superflow past an obstacle, Europhysics Let- ters143, 46005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    G. K. Batchelor,An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 1967)

    work page 1967

  35. [35]

    G. W. Stagg, N. G. Parker, and C. F. Barenghi, Quan- tum analogues of classical wakes in Bose–Einstein con- densates, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 095304 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    G. W. Stagg, A. J. Allen, C. F. Barenghi, and N. G. Parker, Classical-like wakes past elliptical obstacles in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, Journal of Physics: Conference Series594, 012044 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Kokubo, H

    H. Kokubo, H. Takeuchi, and K. Kasamatsu, Critical velocity for quantized vortex formation in a superfluid with a plate-shaped obstacle, Journal of Low Tempera- ture Physics215, 430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Kokubo, H

    H. Kokubo, H. Takeuchi, and K. Kasamatsu, Critical ve- locity for wake vortex generation behind a plate in a su- perflow, Phys. Rev. A111, 043314 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Musser, D

    S. Musser, D. Proment, M. Onorato, and W. T. M. Irvine, Starting Flow Past an Airfoil and its Acquired Lift in a Superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 154502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bose-Einstein Condensation of Atoms in a Uniform Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200406 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Navon, R

    N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nature Physics17, 1334 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    W. J. Kwon, G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, L. Galantucci, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Sound emission and annihilations in a programmable quantum vortex collider, Nature(London)600, 64 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Hern´ andez-Rajkov, N

    D. Hern´ andez-Rajkov, N. Grani, F. Scazza, G. Del Pace, W. Kwon, M. Inguscio, K. Xhani, C. Fort, M. Modugno, F. Marino,et al., Connecting shear flow and vortex array instabilities in annular atomic superfluids, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Gauthier, I

    G. Gauthier, I. Lenton, N. M. Parry, M. Baker, M. J. Davis, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. W. Neely, Direct imaging of a digital-micromirror device for configurable microscopic optical potentials, Optica3, 1136 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    E. P. Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Il Nuovo Cimento20, 454 (1961)

    work page 1961

  46. [46]

    L. P. Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP13, 451 (1961)

    work page 1961

  47. [47]

    Tsubota, M

    M. Tsubota, M. Kobayashi, and H. Takeuchi, Quantum hydrodynamics, Physics Reports522, 191 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    H. E. Stanley,Introduction to phase transitions and crit- ical phenomena(Oxford University Press, 1987)

    work page 1987

  49. [49]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Vol. 5 (Elsevier, 2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith,Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases(Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical Model of El- ementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Supercon- ductivity. I, Phys. Rev.122, 345 (1961)

    work page 1961

  52. [52]

    Goldstone, Field theories with Superconductor solu- tions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    J. Goldstone, Field theories with Superconductor solu- tions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    work page 1955

  53. [53]

    Goldstone, A

    J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Broken Sym- metries, Phys. Rev.127, 965 (1962)

    work page 1962

  54. [54]

    Coutant and R

    A. Coutant and R. Parentani, Black hole lasers, a mode analysis, Phys. Rev. D81, 084042 (2010)

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Finazzi and R

    S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, Black hole lasers in Bose–Einstein condensates, New Journal of Physics12, 095015 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Y.-H. Wang, T. Jacobson, M. Edwards, and C. W. Clark, Mechanism of stimulated Hawking radiation in a labora- tory Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A96, 023616 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Takeuchi, M

    H. Takeuchi, M. Kobayashi, and K. Kasamatsu, Is a dou- bly quantized vortex dynamically unstable in uniform su- perfluids?, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 023601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Takeuchi and K

    H. Takeuchi and K. Kasamatsu, Nambu-Goldstone modes in segregated Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A88, 043612 (2013)

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    Takeuchi, Spin-current instability at a magnetic do- main wall in a ferromagnetic superfluid: A generation mechanism of eccentric fractional skyrmions, Phys

    H. Takeuchi, Spin-current instability at a magnetic do- main wall in a ferromagnetic superfluid: A generation mechanism of eccentric fractional skyrmions, Phys. Rev. A105, 013328 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, 2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    4 are not shown in this paper

    Our formulation of the semi-classical theory works well forn≥2, although figures analogous to Fig. 4 are not shown in this paper

    work page

  62. [62]

    Under the Neumann boundary condition atx=L x/2, we haveθ 1 =− ¯PinLx/(2ℏ) andU 1 =u 1(Lx/2) in Eq. (15). In contrast, Eq. (16) cannot satisfy the boundary con- ditions exactly. Then, we useu 1(−Lx/4) to determine U1 asU 1 =u 1(−Lx/4)e| ¯Pout|Lx/(4ℏ).V 1 is determined by the ratio [Eq. (17)]. For the interface modes, the coeffi- cient ⃗U1 in Eq. (16) is de...

    work page

  63. [63]

    Greiner,Quantum mechanics: an introduction (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    W. Greiner,Quantum mechanics: an introduction (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    Kovrizhin, Exact form of the Bogoliubov excitations in one-dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Physics Letters A287, 392 (2001)

    D. Kovrizhin, Exact form of the Bogoliubov excitations in one-dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Physics Letters A287, 392 (2001)

    work page 2001