Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Influence of bending parameters on crystalline undulator radiation peak stability for 530 MeV positron channelling

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulation shows crystalline undulator peak shifts only 0.0054 MeV when bending amplitude and period are changed, and predicts a 0.515 MeV peak for a four-period undulator.

desk verdict A useful parameter-sensitivity map for crystalline undulator design; the stability conclusion is likely robust, but the headline 5.4 keV shift needs error bars before it is quantitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.06921 v2 pith:42RN7PXC submitted 2026-01-11 physics.acc-ph physics.app-phphysics.atom-ph

Matthew D. Dickers , Felipe Fantuzzi , Nigel J. Mason , Andrei V. Korol , Andrey V. Solov'yov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-phphysics.app-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords crystallineundulatorradiationpositronchannellingchannelingperiodicallybentcrystalscontinuouspotentialapproximationrelativisticmoleculardynamicsgamma-raylightsourcespeakstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the radiation peak from a crystalline undulator—a crystal with a periodic bend, through which fast positrons channel and emit photons—keeps its photon energy when the bending amplitude and period are varied. Relativistic molecular dynamics simulations of 530 MeV positrons in periodically bent diamond (110) show that along a line of constant predicted peak energy, the simulated peak moves by only 5.4×10⁻³ MeV across a range of bending amplitudes from 0.60 Å to 2.48 Å. The paper also finds that increasing the bending amplitude pushes the peak to lower photon energies while shortening the period pushes it higher, and that a four-period undulator matched to a recent experiment should emit at about 0.515 MeV. This matters because real crystals cannot be bent to exact specifications; the work quantifies how much bending error is tolerable before the radiation loses its spectral definition.

What carries the argument

The key objects are the first-harmonic energy formula ℏω₁ = 9.5 ε²/[λ(1+K²/2)] from the continuous potential approximation and the Tsyganov bending parameter C = 4π² ε a/(λ² U′_max). The first generates the isolines of constant peak energy that are tested; the second flags when centrifugal force approaches the inter-planar restoring force, explaining the intensity drop through dechannelling at large amplitude and short period. The relativistic MD simulation acts as the arbiter: it resolves discrete atom–positron collisions, tracks dechannelling and rechannelling, and produces the spectra whose peaks are compared with the isoline predictions.

What would settle it

Recompute the four isoline spectra with a much larger ensemble (e.g., 10,000 trajectories) and fit the peaks with a defined uncertainty; if the peak-to-peak spread is comparable to or smaller than the statistical error, the stability claim is not quantitatively supported. Alternatively, measure the CUR peak energy of two crystals whose (a, λ) lie on the same isoline but whose parameter values span the simulated range: a photon-energy difference near 0.005 MeV would confirm the cancellation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the first-harmonic photon energy of crystalline undulator radiation from 530 MeV positrons channelling in periodically bent C(110) remains stable along lines of constant predicted energy, even when the bending amplitude changes by a factor of four. The authors establish this by computing the continuum-potential formula ℏω₁ = 9.5 ε²/[λ(1+K²/2)] to draw isolines in the (a, λ) plane, then verifying four points on one isoline (ℏω₁ ≈ 0.526 MeV) with fully atomistic relativistic MD simulations of 2000 trajectories per point. The simulated peak positions differ by only 5.4×10⁻³ MeV between the smallest and largest bending amplitudes. They further report that for a four-per

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 5.4×10⁻³ MeV spread between simulated peak positions is a real physical trend rather than statistical noise: the paper does not quote error bars on the peak positions, and 2000 trajectories with finite spectral binning could conceal a comparable numerical scatter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Manufacturers can tolerate bending amplitude errors of up to ~2 Å along an isoline and still produce radiation with a peak energy stable to a few thousandths of an MeV.
  • The 0.515 MeV prediction gives a specific search band for upcoming 530 MeV positron channelling experiments, narrowing the energy range that detectors must scan.
  • Because intensity grows with bending amplitude (until dechannelling dominates), the isoline framework lets designers pick the highest stable amplitude for maximum flux without moving the peak.
  • The same continuous-potential-plus-MD procedure transfers directly to other beam energies and crystal types, providing a parameter map for future light-source designs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper demonstrates stability on a single isoline; a natural but unproven extension is that every isoline in the (a, λ) plane behaves similarly, which would make the whole design space a set of nearly flat energy contours.
  • The quoted 5.4×10⁻³ MeV stability is derived from one emission cone (θ₀ = 0.139/γ); the paper notes that cone size shifts the absolute peak energy, so the isoline pattern may be cone-dependent—testing two cones at the same isoline points would settle this.
  • If stability persists for beams with finite divergence and energy spread, the isoline approach becomes a practical tolerance specification tool; the present zero-divergence, mono-energetic simulations are an idealized limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the stability of the crystalline undulator radiation (CUR) peak for 530 MeV positrons channeling in periodically bent C(110) crystals. Two methods are used: the continuous potential approximation to compute isolines of constant first harmonic energy ℏω1, and relativistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations performed with MBN Explorer for a grid of bending amplitudes (0.60–2.50 Å) and periods (3.5–8.0 μm). The main claims are: (i) along the ℏω1 ≈ 0.526 MeV isoline, the MD-simulated peak position shifts by only 5.4×10^-3 MeV across the four studied amplitude–period combinations, indicating peak stability; (ii) decreasing the bending period or increasing the amplitude shifts the CUR peak to higher or lower energies, respectively, with enhanced dechanneling at large amplitude and short period; and (iii) for a four-period undulator with parameters close to the MAMI setup (a ≈ 1.38 Å, λ = 5.0 μm), the predicted CUR peak is approximately 0.515 MeV.

Significance. If the central stability claim survives scrutiny, the paper provides a valuable design tool for crystalline undulator gamma-ray sources: a closed-form analytical recipe for identifying amplitude–period combinations that keep the CUR peak energy fixed, validated by independent atomistic MD simulations that are not fitted to the analytical isolines. The work is timely given the MAMI positron beamline and the ongoing experimental effort in crystal-based light sources. The MD simulations are a genuine independent check, and the analytical estimate is parameter-free in the sense that it uses standard expressions for K^2 and the first harmonic. The main weakness is the absence of any uncertainty quantification on the key simulated peak positions, which directly affects the credibility of the stability claim and the quantitative predictions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Fig. 6] The central quantitative result—the 5.4×10^-3 MeV total shift in the CUR peak along the ℏω1 ≈ 0.526 MeV isoline—is reported without any estimate of statistical or systematic uncertainty. The spectra are computed from N0 = 2000 trajectories, the spectral bin width is not given, and the peak-extraction algorithm is not described. With peak widths of order 0.05 MeV in Fig. 6, the sampling error on a peak centroid can easily be comparable to the quoted shift; the monotonic ordering of the four points could therefore be numerical noise. This is load-bearing because the stability conclusion, the 'does not change noticeably' statement, the manufacturing-tolerance estimates, and the 0.515 MeV prediction all depend on this number. Please report the bin width, the peak-fitting procedure, and the propagated uncertainties (e.g., bootstrap over trajectories or multiple independent MD runs).
  2. [§3.3, Fig. 6] The four peak positions along the isoline are not tabulated. The reader cannot verify the 5.4×10^-3 MeV shift or the trend from the figure markers alone. Please provide a table listing the four bending amplitudes, periods, extracted peak positions, and their uncertainties. This is essential for reproducibility and for comparing the atomistic results to the analytical ℏω1 values from Eq. (5).
  3. [§3.4, Fig. 7] The predicted MAMI-relevant CUR peak energy, 'approximately 0.515 MeV', is the average of only two simulated cases with a = 1.23 Å and 1.44 Å. No uncertainty is given for this average, and the two amplitudes differ by only 0.21 Å, which is a small portion of the studied amplitude range. Even a simple half-range or standard error of the two values would provide a much-needed quantitative precision estimate. As written, the three-significant-figure presentation implies a certainty that the statistics do not support.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.1, text] Typo: 'dehcannelling' should be 'dechannelling'.
  2. [§3.2, text] The sentence 'shorter bending periods and larger bending amplitudes increase the transverse acceleration of the particle increases' contains a duplicated verb; rephrase to 'increase the transverse acceleration of the particle'.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The notation 'θ0 = 5/γ4821 µrad' is missing the approximation sign; it should be 'θ0 ≈ 5/γ = 4821 µrad' (and similarly in the text if it appears).
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (5) discussion] In the sentence about a periodically bent C(110) crystal, the phrase 'C(110) crystal' is repeated; one occurrence should be removed.
  5. [Table S2, Supplementary Information] Table S2 is labeled 'Undulator Parameter K_u^2', but the listed values are actually K_u, not K_u^2. For example, for a = 1.44 Å and λ = 5.0 μm, K_u = (2πγa/λ) ≈ 0.188 and K_u^2 ≈ 0.035, yet the table lists 0.188. This appears to be a labeling error; the subsequent Table S3 uses the correct squared values. Please correct the table header or entries.
  6. [Table S1, Supplementary Information] One entry appears to be a typo: for a = 1.23 Å and λ = 6.0 μm, the bending parameter is listed as 0.199, but evaluation of Eq. (1) gives C ≈ 0.119 (consistent with the neighboring entries such as a = 1.44 Å, λ = 6.5 μm). Please verify and correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MD spectra are independent outputs; the 0.515 MeV value is a simulation result, not a fit to the target.

full rationale

The paper's central stability claim rests on relativistic MD spectra evaluated from recorded trajectories via Eq. (6) and the MBN Explorer radiation algorithm, not on inserting the analytical first-harmonic formula Eq. (5) into the simulation. The four MD points on the ℏω1 ≈ 0.526 MeV isoline are inputs chosen from the continuum model, but the simulated peak positions are independent outputs; the small 5.4e-3 MeV spread is not a fit residual. The 0.515 MeV MAMI estimate is the average of two simulated peak positions. The analytical corrections (K^2 = K_u^2 + K_ch^2(1−C), Eqs. 2–3) and the MBN Explorer code come from the authors' prior work, but these are cited methodological/theoretical building blocks, not an unverified uniqueness theorem or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The absence of reported statistical uncertainties on peak positions is a precision/robustness concern, not a circularity. Hence no derivation step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to the target quantities: the amplitude and period grid are inputs, and the potential parameters are taken from literature. The central claims rest on the standard analytical undulator theory, the classical relativistic MD model, and the diamond potential data. The main unquantified assumption is that the MD spectra resolve small peak shifts (~0.005 MeV) with sufficient precision.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Lindhard continuum potential approximation
    Used to derive the analytical estimates of CUR peak position and to identify isolines in §2.1.
  • domain assumption Classical relativistic MD with Molière potential
    The atomistic simulations in §2.2 treat each positron trajectory classically and neglect quantum effects on the dynamics, which is standard for this energy and channeling regime.
  • standard math First harmonic undulator formula ℏω1 = 9.5 ε² / [λ(1+K²/2)]
    Equation (5) from undulator theory, cited to Refs. [45,48]; used to compute the isolines and to guide the MD analysis.
  • domain assumption Diamond potential parameters U'_max ≈ 6 GeV/cm, U0 ≈ 20 eV, d=1.2611 Å at 300 K
    Taken from prior literature and used in Eqs. (1), (3), (4); if these values are inaccurate, the computed C, K², and ℏω1 values shift.
  • domain assumption K² = K_u² + K_ch²(1-C) correction for curved channels
    The form of the combined undulator parameter, introduced in Ref. [46], is assumed; it affects the isoline positions and the peak-energy estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of bending parameters on crystalline undulator radiation peak stability for 530 MeV positron channelling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/42RN7PXC

@misc{pith2026260106921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of bending parameters on crystalline undulator radiation peak stability for 530 MeV positron channelling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/42RN7PXC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.06921}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the stability of crystalline undulator radiation (CUR) peaks emitted by 530 MeV positron channelling in periodically bent C(110) crystals with varying bending amplitudes and bending periods. Relativistic molecular dynamics simulations were performed to quantify how these parameters affect the intensity and position of the CUR peak. The continuous potential approximation was used to identify isolines of constant peak energy, providing a reference for regions of spectral stability. MD results show that increasing the bending amplitude shifts the CUR peak to lower photon energies, while decreasing the period shifts it to higher energies, with both trends accompanied by enhanced dechannelling. For crystal parameters similar to recent experiments conducted at the MAinz MIkrotron (MAMI), the simulated CUR peak appears near 0.515 MeV. These results demonstrate that the CUR peak remains stable across a broad range of bending amplitudes and periods, providing quantitative estimates of the sensitivity of the emitted radiation to variations in the crystal bending parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V.: Crystal-based Intensive Gamma-ray Light Sources. Europ. Phys. J. D. 74(10), 201 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjd/e2020-10239-8

    doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-10239-8 2020

  2. [2]

    Kon- gel

    Lindhard, J.: Influence Of Crystal Lattice On Motion Of Energetic Charged Particles. Kon- gel. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., Mat.-Fys. Medd. 34(14), 1–64 (1965)

    1965

  3. [3]

    Kumakhov, M.A.: On the Theory of Electro- magnetic Radiation of Charged Particles in a Crystal. Phys. Lett. A57(1), 17–18 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(76) 90438-2 12

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76 1976

  4. [4]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: Coherent Radiation of an Ultrarelativis- tic Charged Particle Channelled in a Periodically Bent Crystal. J. Phys. G 24(5), 45 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0954-3899/24/5/001

    1998

  5. [5]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: Channeling of positrons through periodically bent crystals: On the feasibility of crystalline undulator and gamma-laser. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 13, 867–916 (2004) https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S0218301304002557

    doi:10.1142/s0218301304002557 2004

  6. [6]

    Thin Solid Films520(3), 1074–1079 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.09

    Guidi, V., Lanzoni, L., Mazzolari, A.: Pat- terning and Modeling of Mechanically Bent Silicon Plates Deformed through Coactive Stresses. Thin Solid Films520(3), 1074–1079 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.09. 008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2011.09 2011

  7. [7]

    Guidi, V., Lanzoni, L., Mazzolari, A., Mar- tinelli, G., Tralli, A.: Design of a Crystalline Undulator Based on Patterning by Tensile Si3N4 Strips on a Si Crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(11), 114107 (2007) https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.2712510

    doi:10.1063/1.2712510 2007

  8. [8]

    Malagutti, L., Bandiera, L., Bonafè, F., Canale, N., De Salvador, D., Fedeli, P., Gar- rido, J.R., Guidi, V., Lanzoni, L., Korol, A.V., Mancarella, F., Negrello, R., Paternò, G., Romagnoni, M., Sgarbossa, F., Solov’yov, A.V., Sytov, A., Valzani, D., Mazzolari, A.: From simulation to fabrication: Realiz- ing silicon crystalline undulators with sili- con ni...

    doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025 2025

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Bellucci, S., Bini, S., Biryukov, V.M., Chesnokov, Y.A., Dabagov, S., Giannini, G., Guidi, V., Ivanov, Y.M., Kotov, V.I., Maisheev, V.A., Malagù, C., Martinelli, G., Petrunin, A.A., Skorobogatov, V.V., Stefan- cich, M., Vincenzi, D.: Experimental Study for the Feasibility of a...

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    Guidi, V., Antonini, A., Baricordi, S., Logallo, F., Malagù, C., Milan, E., Ron- zoni, A., Stefancich, M., Martinelli, G., Vomiero, A.: Tailoring of Silicon Crystals for Relativistic-particle Channeling. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B234(1), 40– 46 (2005) https://doi.org/...

    2005 doi

  3. [11]

    Balling, P., Esberg, J., Kirsebom, K., Le, D.Q.S., Uggerhøj, U.I., Connell, S.H., Härtwig, J., Masiello, F., Rommeveaux, A.: Bending diamonds by femtosecond laser abla- tion. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267(17), 2952–2957 (2009) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.109

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    Bagli, E., Bandiera, L., Bellucci, V., Berra, A., Camattari, R., De Salvador, D., Ger- mogli, G., Guidi, V., Lanzoni, L., Lietti, D., Mazzolari, A., Prest, M., Tikhomirov, V.V., Vallazza, E.: Experimental evidence of pla- nar channeling in a periodically bent crystal. Eur. Phy...

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Camattari, R., Paternò, G., Romagnoni, M., Bellucci, V., Mazzolari, A., Guidi, V.: Homogeneous self-standingcurved monocrys- tals, obtained using sandblasting, to be used as manipulators of hard X-rays and charged particle beams. J. Appl. Crystal- logr. 50(1), 145–151 (2017) h...

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Bellucci, V., Camattari, R., Guidi, V., Maz- zolari, A., Paternò, G., Mattei, G., Scian, C., Lanzoni,L.:Ionimplantationformanufactur- ing bent and periodically bent crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(6), 064102 (2015) https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.4928553

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Breese, M.B.H.: Beam bending using graded composition strained layers. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 132(3), 540–547 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0168-583X(97)00455-2

    1997

  8. [16]

    Mikkelsen, U., Uggerhøj, E.: A Crys- talline Undulator Based on Graded Com- position Strained Layers in a Superlat- tice. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 160(3), 435–439 (2000) https://doi.org/10. 13 1016/S0168-583X(99)00637-0

    2000

  9. [17]

    Krause, W., Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: Photon emission by ultra-relativistic positrons in crys- talline undulators: the high-energy regime. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 483(1), 455–460 (2002) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)00361-3

    2002 doi

  10. [19]

    Thi, T.N.T., Morse, J., Caliste, D., Fernan- dez, B., Eon, D., Härtwig, J., C., C.B., Mer- Calfati, C., Tranchant, N., Arnault, J.C., Laf- ford, T.A., Baruchel, J.: Synchrotron bragg diffraction imaging characterization of syn- thetic diamond crystals for optical and elec- tro...

    2017 doi

  11. [20]

    Physics Letters A 77, 61–64 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9601(80)90637-4

    Baryshevsky, V.G., Dubovskaya, I.Y., Gru- bich, A.O.: Generation of γ-quanta by channeled particles in the presence of a variable external field. Physics Letters A 77, 61–64 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9601(80)90637-4

    1980

  12. [21]

    Ikezi, H., Lin-Liu, Y., Ohkawa, T.: Chan- neling Radiation in a Periodically Distorted Crystal. Phys. Rev. B 30(3), 1567–1569 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 30.1567

    1984 doi

  13. [22]

    Dedkov, G.V.: Channeling Radiation in a Crystal Undergoing an Action of Ultrasonic or Electromagnetic Waves. Phys. Stat. Sol. 184(2), 535–542 (1994) https://doi.org/10. 1002/pssb.2221840227

    1994

  14. [23]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: Photon Emission by an Ultra- relativistic Particle Channeling in a Periodically Bent Crystal. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 08(01), 49–100 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0218301399000069

    1999 doi

  15. [24]

    Kaleris, K., Kaselouris, E., Dimitriou, V., Kaniolakis-Kaloudis, E., Bakarezos, M., Tatarakis, M., Papadogiannis, N.A., Sushko, G.B., Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V.: Narrowband γ-ray radiation gen- eration by acoustically driven crystalline undulators. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28...

    2025

  16. [25]

    Kaniolakis-Kaloudis, E., Papadogiannis, N.A., Orphanos, Y., Bakarezos, M., Kaleris, K.: Precise control of high-frequency ultra- sounds in thin crystals for the development of tunable narrowband and directional γ- ray sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.158, 4007 (2025) https://doi.or...

    2025 doi

  17. [26]

    Tomin, S., Kaiser, J., Lockmann, N.M., Wohlenberg, T., Zagorodnov, I.: Undulator linear taper control at the european x-ray free-electron laser facility. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 042801 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.042801

    2024

  18. [27]

    https://mbnresearch.com/TECHNO-CLS/ Main

  19. [28]

    Backe, H., Lauth, W., Drexler, P., Heil, P., Klag, P., Ledroit, B., Stieler, F.: Design study for a 500 mev positron beam at the mainz microtron mami. Eur. Phys. J. D 76(8), 150 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjd/s10053-022-00465-9

    2022

  20. [29]

    Backe, H.: On planar (110) channeling of 500 mev positrons and electrons in silicon semi- conductor detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1059, 168998 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2023.168998

    2024

  21. [30]

    Mazzolari, A., Backe, H., Bandiera, L., Canale, N., De Salvador, D., Drexler, P., Guidi, V., Klag, P., Lauth, W., Malagutti, L., Negrello, R., Paternò, G., Romagnoni, M., Sgarbossa, F., Sytov, A., Tikhomirov, V., Valzani, D.: Observation of fine structure in channeling of part...

    2025 doi

  22. [31]

    Pavlov, A.V., Korol, A.V., Ivanov, V.K., 14 Solov’yov, A.V.: Channeling of electrons and positrons in straight and periodically bent diamond(110) crystals. Eur. Phys. J. D 74(2), 21 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjd/e2019-100224-3

    2020

  23. [32]

    Korol, A.V., Sushko, G.B., Solov’yov, A.V.: All-atom relativistic molecular dynamics sim- ulations of channeling and radiation pro- cesses in oriented crystals. Eur. Phys. J. D 75(3), 107 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjd/s10053-021-00111-w

    2021

  24. [33]

    Sushko, G.B., Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V.: Atomistic modeling of the channeling process with and without account for ionizing colli- sions: A comparative study. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 569, 165911 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2025.165911

    2025

  25. [34]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V.: Electron and positron channelling and photon emission processes in boron doped periodically bent diamond. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1083, 171160 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nima.2025.171160

    2026

  26. [35]

    Backe, H., Baruchel, J., Bénichou, S., Dowek, R., Eon, D., Everaere, P., Kirste, L., Klag, P., Lauth, W., Straňák, P., Caliste, T.N.T.: Observation of narrow-bandγ radiation from a boron-doped diamond superlattice with an 855 MeV electron beam (2025)

    2025

  27. [36]

    Channeling 2012

    Backe, H., Krambrich, D., Lauth, W., Ander- sen, K.K., Lundsgaard Hansen, J., Uggerhøj, U.I.:Radiationemissionatchannelingofelec- trons in a strained layer si1-xgex undulator crystal. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interac- tions with Mater...

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    Wistisen, T.N., Andersen, K.K., Yilmaz, S., Mikkelsen, R., Hansen, J.L., Uggerhøj, U.I., Lauth, W., Backe, H.: Experimental realiza- tion of a new type of crystalline undulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 254801 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.254801

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    The European Physical Journal D 71(5), 124 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2017-70720-y

    Wistisen, T.N., Uggerhøj, U.I., Hansen, J.L., Lauth, W., Klag, P.: Radiation collimation in a thick crystalline undulator. The European Physical Journal D 71(5), 124 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2017-70720-y

    2017 doi

  30. [39]

    Springer, Cham (2022)

    Korol, A., Solov’yov, A.V.: Novel Light Sources Beyond Free Elec- tron Lasers. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04282-9

    2022 doi

  31. [40]

    Sushko, G.B., Bezchastnov, V.G., Solov’yov, I.A., Korol, A.V., Greiner, W., Solov’yov, A.V.: Simulation of ultra-relativistic elec- trons and positrons channeling in crystals with MBN Explorer. J. Comput. Phys.252, 404–418 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcp.2013.06.028

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    Solov’yov, I.A., Yakubovich, A.V., Nikolaev, P.V., Volkovets, I., Solov’yov, A.V.: Meso- BioNano Explorer–a Universal Program for MultiscaleComputer SimulationsofComplex Molecular Structure and Dynamics. J. Com- put. Chem. 33(30), 2412–2439 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23086

    2012 doi

  33. [42]

    Sushko, G.B., Solov’yov, I.A., Solov’yov, A.V.: Modeling MesoBioNano Systems with MBN Studio Made Easy. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 88, 247–260 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.02.003

    2019 doi

  34. [43]

    Dickers, M.D., Fantuzzi, F., Mason, N.J., Sushko, G.B., Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V.: Structural effects of boron doping in diamond crystals for gamma-ray light-source appli- cations: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations (2025)

    2025

  35. [44]

    Technical Report TM-682, Fermi National Acceler- ator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois (1976)

    Tsyganov, E.N.: Some aspects of the mechanism of a charged particle pene- tration through a monocrystal. Technical Report TM-682, Fermi National Acceler- ator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois (1976). https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/test-tm/0000/ fermilab-tm-0682.pdf

    1976

  36. [45]

    Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: Channeling and Radiation in Periodically 15 Bent Crystals. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54933-5

    2014 doi

  37. [46]

    Korol, A.V., Solov’yov, A.V., Greiner, W.: The influence of the dechannelling process on the photon emission by an ultra-relativistic positron channelling in a periodically bent crystal. J. Phys. G 27(1), 95 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/27/1/307

    2001 doi

  38. [47]

    Saotome, T., Ohashi, K., Sato, T., Maeta, H., Haruna, K., Ono, F.: Thermal expansion of a boron-doped diamond single crystal at low temperatures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter10, 1267–1272 (1998)

    1998

  39. [48]

    Elleaume, P.: Insertion devices for the new generation of synchrotron sources: A review (invited). Rev. Sci. Instrum.63(1), 321–326 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1142744

    1992 doi

  40. [49]

    einzelstreuung am abgeschirmten coulomb-feld

    Moliere, G.: Theorie der streuung schneller geladener teilchen i. einzelstreuung am abgeschirmten coulomb-feld. Zeitschrift für NaturforschungA 2(3),133–145(1947)https: //doi.org/10.1515/zna-1947-0302

    1947 doi

  41. [50]

    Korol, A.V., Bezchastnov, V.G., Solov’yov, A.V.: Channeling and radiation of the 855 mev electrons enhanced by the re-channeling in a periodically bent diamond crystal. Eur. Phys. J. D71(6), 174 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjd/e2017-80113-y

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998)

    Jackson, J.D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998)

    1998

  43. [52]

    (eds.) The Proper- ties of Undulator Radiation, pp

    Howells, M.R., Kincaid, B.M.: In: Schlachter, A.S., Wuilleumier, F.J. (eds.) The Proper- ties of Undulator Radiation, pp. 315–358. Springer, Dordrecht (1994). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-011-0868-3_13

    1994 doi

  44. [53]

    Schmüser, P., Dohlus, M., Dohlus, J.: Undu- lator Radiation, pp. 11–22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-79572-8_2 16 Supplemental Information for: Influence of bending parameters on crystalline undulator radiation peak stability for 530 ...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.