pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.10083 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-15 · 💻 cs.NI · cs.ET· math.DG

Starfield: Demand-Aware Satellite Topology Design for Low-Earth Orbit Mega Constellations

Shayan Hamidi Dehshali , Tzu-Hsuan Liao , Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI cs.ETmath.DG
keywords LEO satellite networksdemand-aware topologyinter-satellite linksRiemannian metricStarlink simulationnetwork design heuristictraffic vector field
0
0 comments X

The pith

A demand-aware heuristic aligns LEO satellite laser links with ground traffic flows to shorten paths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes Starfield as a heuristic for designing inter-satellite link topologies in LEO mega-constellations that accounts for uneven traffic demand from ground users. It models the traffic as a vector field across the orbital sphere and derives a Riemannian metric to score potential links, letting each satellite pick the lowest-cost connections plus its angular neighbors. Simulations using a Starlink Phase 1 model demonstrate reductions in hop count of up to 30 percent and stretch factor improvements of 15 percent compared to standard +Grid patterns across various traffic distributions. A static version of the design still yields 20 percent better stretch under realistic traffic. The approach addresses the challenge of limited and unstable laser links by prioritizing connections that serve high-demand regions.

Core claim

Starfield establishes that a demand-aware topology formed by selecting inter-satellite links via a Riemannian heuristic derived from a traffic vector field on the constellation shell yields shorter paths than geometry-only designs such as +Grid, as validated by packet-level simulations showing concrete gains in hop count and stretch.

What carries the argument

A Riemannian metric defined on the spherical shell from the traffic vector field, used to compute a heuristic cost for each possible inter-satellite link.

If this is right

  • Packets traverse fewer satellites on average, directly lowering end-to-end latency.
  • Path lengths stay closer to the shortest possible distances under non-uniform demand.
  • The static inter-orbital variant still improves stretch factor by 20 percent under realistic patterns.
  • Performance gains persist across multiple traffic distributions and moderate perturbations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Periodic recalculation of the traffic vector field could extend the method to time-varying demand.
  • The same vector-field scoring might improve link selection in other large mesh networks with clustered sources and sinks.
  • Shorter average paths could reduce total relay bandwidth consumption across the constellation.

Load-bearing premise

That traffic demand patterns are known accurately in advance and can be represented as a stable vector field on the orbital shell without large real-time fluctuations.

What would settle it

A measurement on an actual deployed constellation showing no reduction in average hop count or stretch factor when the Starfield heuristic is applied versus a +Grid topology would disprove the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.10083 by Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Shayan Hamidi Dehshali, Tzu-Hsuan Liao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: +Grid topology (left) and diagonally oriented topology (right) on a grid of satellites. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geodesic flows (orange lines) between 100 highly populated cities under the distance–population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualization of the electric vector field (left) and the proposed vector field (right) on the spherical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CDFs of city-to-city stretch factor for static Starfield, +Grid, and Random. Vertical lines indicate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Link usage ratio histogram of static Starfield, +Grid, and Random. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CDFs of city-to-city stretch factor (left) and round trip time (right) for +Grid, dynamic Starfield, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histogram of city-to-city hop count (left) and link usage ratio (right) for +Grid, dynamic Starfield, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CDFs of city-to-city stretch factor for +Grid, Starfield with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: CDFs of city-to-city hop count for +Grid, Starfield with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The routed paths selected by +Grid (left) and Starfield (right). The black curve represents the geodesic, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: +Grid (left) and Starfield (right) topologies. In +Grid (left), black lines denote intra-orbital ISLs and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: CDFs of city-to-city stretch factor for +Grid, dynamic Starfield, and static Starfield under constellation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: CDFs of city-to-city round-trip time for +Grid, dynamic Starfield, and static Starfield under constella [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Low-Earth orbit (LEO) mega-constellations are emerging as high-capacity backbones for next-generation Internet. Deployment of laser terminals enables high-bandwidth, low-latency inter-satellite links (ISLs); however, their limited number, slow acquisition, and instability make forming a stable satellite topology difficult. Existing patterns like +Grid and Motif ignore regional traffic, ground station placement, and constellation geometry. Given sparse population distribution on Earth and the isolation of rural areas, traffic patterns are inherently non-uniform, providing an opportunity to orient inter-satellite links (ISLs) according to these traffic patterns. In this paper, we propose Starfield, a novel demand-aware satellite topology design heuristic algorithm supported by mathematical analysis. We first formulate a vector field on the constellation's shell according to traffic flows and define a corresponding Riemannian metric on the spherical manifold of the shell. The metric, combined with the spatial geometry, is used to assign a distance to each potential ISL, which we then aggregate over all demand flows to generate a heuristic for each satellite's link selection. Inspired by +Grid, each satellite selects the link with the minimum Riemannian heuristic along with its corresponding angular links. To evaluate Starfield, we developed a custom, link-aware, and link-configurable packet-level simulator, comparing it against +Grid and Random topologies. For the Phase 1 Starlink, simulation results show up to a 30% reduction in hop count and a 15% improvement in stretch factor across multiple traffic distributions. Moreover, static Starfield, an inter-orbital link matching modification of Starfield, achieves a 20% improvement in stretch factor under realistic traffic patterns compared to +Grid. Experiments further demonstrate Starfield's robustness under traffic demand perturbations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Starfield, a demand-aware heuristic for LEO mega-constellation topology design. Traffic is modeled as a vector field on the spherical shell; a Riemannian metric is defined from this field and spatial geometry; each satellite then selects ISLs by minimizing the resulting distance heuristic (plus angular links). Packet-level simulations on Phase-1 Starlink report up to 30% hop-count reduction and 15% stretch-factor improvement versus +Grid/Random baselines across traffic distributions; a static inter-orbital variant yields 20% stretch improvement under realistic patterns, with additional experiments claiming robustness to demand perturbations.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work supplies a mathematically grounded method to align ISL topologies with non-uniform global traffic, offering measurable reductions in hop count and stretch that could translate to lower latency in operational mega-constellations. The Riemannian construction and custom link-configurable simulator are concrete contributions that could be reused or extended by the community.

major comments (2)
  1. [Evaluation] Evaluation section: the robustness claim under traffic perturbations is stated, yet no quantitative sensitivity analysis is supplied showing the vector-field deviation magnitude (e.g., 20-30% relative error in regional flows) at which the reported 30% hop-count or 15% stretch gains fall below 10%. This directly affects the practicality of the central claim given fluctuating real-world demand.
  2. [Simulator] Simulator description: the fidelity of the custom packet-level simulator is not characterized (validation against ground-truth demand traces, modeling of link acquisition dynamics, or confirmation that the same fixed vector field drives both topology generation and traffic injection). Without these details the headline performance numbers rest on an unverified artifact.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: performance figures are given without error bars, confidence intervals, or the exact number of simulation runs, reducing interpretability of the 30%/15%/20% gains.
  2. [Model] Notation: the precise definition of the Riemannian metric tensor and its aggregation over demand flows should be cross-referenced to the heuristic equation to avoid ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with differential geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the paper's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation section: the robustness claim under traffic perturbations is stated, yet no quantitative sensitivity analysis is supplied showing the vector-field deviation magnitude (e.g., 20-30% relative error in regional flows) at which the reported 30% hop-count or 15% stretch gains fall below 10%. This directly affects the practicality of the central claim given fluctuating real-world demand.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative sensitivity analysis would strengthen the robustness claim. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection to the Evaluation section that systematically perturbs the input vector field with relative errors ranging from 10% to 50% in regional flows. For each perturbation level we will report the resulting hop-count reduction and stretch improvement, explicitly identifying the deviation magnitude at which gains drop below 10%. This analysis will be performed on the same Phase-1 Starlink topology and traffic distributions used in the original experiments. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulator] Simulator description: the fidelity of the custom packet-level simulator is not characterized (validation against ground-truth demand traces, modeling of link acquisition dynamics, or confirmation that the same fixed vector field drives both topology generation and traffic injection). Without these details the headline performance numbers rest on an unverified artifact.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the simulator lacks sufficient characterization of its fidelity. In the revised manuscript we will expand the simulator section to include: (i) validation results comparing simulator outputs against synthetic ground-truth demand traces generated from population-density and traffic models, (ii) explicit modeling of link acquisition and pointing dynamics using published Starlink terminal parameters, and (iii) a clear statement and diagram confirming that the identical vector field is used both to generate the topology and to drive packet injection in all reported experiments. These additions will be placed in the main text rather than the appendix. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: heuristic defined from traffic vector field with independent simulation evaluation

full rationale

The paper defines a vector field directly from given traffic flows, constructs a Riemannian metric on the spherical shell from that field, and uses the resulting distance heuristic to select ISLs. Simulation results (hop-count and stretch improvements) are obtained by running a packet-level simulator on topologies generated from the same modeled traffic. This is a standard demand-aware construction with no self-definitional loop, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated inputs and does not reduce claimed gains to a tautology by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on modeling traffic as a vector field and defining a Riemannian metric that aggregates demand into link heuristics; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Traffic flows can be represented as a continuous vector field on the spherical shell of the constellation.
    Invoked to construct the Riemannian metric used for link scoring.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 1179 out tokens · 68769 ms · 2026-05-16T14:31:21.763902+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abdullahi K Abubakar, Mohamed M Kassem, and Nishanth Sastry. 2024. Choosing the Right Spot: How Well Are LEO Satellite Gateways Placed? Starlink Case-Study. InProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on LEO Networking and Communication. 49–54

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Ralph Alexander and Stephanie Alexander. 1981. Geodesics in Riemannian manifolds-with-boundary.Indiana University Mathematics Journal30, 4 (1981), 481–488

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    Amazon. 2026. Amazon Leo. https://www.aboutamazon.com/what-we-do/devices-services/amazon-leo. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Jeffrey G Andrews, Todd E Humphreys, and Tingfang Ji. 2024. 6 G Takes Shape.IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine(2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Dhiraj Bhattacharjee, Aizaz U Chaudhry, Halim Yanikomeroglu, Peng Hu, and Guillaume Lamontagne. 2023. Laser inter-satellite link setup delay: Quantification, impact, and tolerable value. In2023 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 1–6

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Debopam Bhattacherjee and Ankit Singla. 2019. Network topology design at 27,000 km/hour. InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments And Technologies. 341–354

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Travis R Brashears. 2024. Achieving 99% link uptime on a fleet of 100G space laser inter-satellite links in LEO. In Free-Space Laser Communications XXXVI, Vol. 12877. SPIE, 1287702

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Carlos Carrizo, Markus Knapek, Joachim Horwath, Dionisio Diaz Gonzalez, and Paul Cornwell. 2020. Optical inter- satellite link terminals for next generation satellite constellations. InFree-Space Laser Communications XXXII, Vol. 11272. SPIE, 8–18

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Belfer Center. [n. d.]. Starlink and the Russia-Ukraine War: A Case of Commercial Technology and Public Pur- pose? https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/starlink-and-russia-ukraine-war-case-commercial-technology-and- public-purpose. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Cesium. 2026. CesiumJS. https://cesium.com/platform/cesiumjs/

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    Aizaz U Chaudhry and Halim Yanikomeroglu. 2020. Free space optics for next-generation satellite networks.IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine10, 6 (2020), 21–31

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Aizaz U Chaudhry and Halim Yanikomeroglu. 2021. Laser intersatellite links in a starlink constellation: A classification and analysis.IEEE vehicular technology magazine16, 2 (2021), 48–56

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Long Chen, Yi Ching Chou, Haoyuan Zhao, Hengzhi Wang, Feng Wang, Hao Fang, Sami Ma, Feilong Tang, Linghe Kong, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2025. On-Demand and Scalable Topology Control Service for LEO Satellite Network Evolving.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing(2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Quan Chen, Lei Yang, Yong Zhao, Yi Wang, Haibo Zhou, and Xiaoqian Chen. 2024. 3-ISL Topology: Routing Properties and Performance in LEO Mega-Constellation Networks.IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Systems(2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    2025.Cloudflare Radar

    Cloudflare Radar. 2025.Cloudflare Radar. SpaceX Starlink’s Traffic Worldwide (Traffic from AS14593). https://radar. cloudflare.com/traffic/as14593 , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: January 2026. 22 Shayan Hamidi Dehshali, Tzu-Hsuan Liao, and Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    2008.Computational geometry: algorithms and applications

    Mark De Berg, Otfried Cheong, Marc Van Kreveld, and Mark Overmars. 2008.Computational geometry: algorithms and applications. Springer

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Edsger W Dijkstra. 2022. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. InEdsger Wybe Dijkstra: his life, work, and legacy. ACM, 287–290

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    1992.Riemannian geometry

    Manfredo Perdigao Do Carmo and J Flaherty Francis. 1992.Riemannian geometry. Vol. 2. Springer

    work page 1992

  19. [19]

    Earth. [n. d.]. 50% of Earth’s Land Surface Remains Relatively Untouched By Humans. https://earth.org/half-of-earths- land-surface-remains-relatively-untouched-by-humans/. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    2023.Introduction to electrodynamics

    David J Griffiths. 2023.Introduction to electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Samuel Gruffaz and Josua Sassen. 2025. Riemannian metric learning: Closer to you than you imagine.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05321(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Internet from Space

    Yannick Hauri, Debopam Bhattacherjee, Manuel Grossmann, and Ankit Singla. 2020. " Internet from Space" without Inter-satellite Links. InProceedings of the 19th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. 205–211

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Business Insider. 2023. Everything we know about Elon Musk’s Starlink satellites and future internet plans. https: //www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-starlink-satellites-internet. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Starlink Insider. [n. d.]. Starlink Ground Station Locations (2025). https://starlinkinsider.com/starlink-gateway- locations/. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Iridium. 2026. Iridium Network. https://www.iridium.com/network

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Jayasuryan V Iyer, Khasim Shaheed Shaik Mahammad, Yashodhan Dandekar, Ramakrishna Akella, Chen Chen, Phillip E Barber, and Peter J Worters. 2023. System and method of providing a medium access control scheduler. US Patent 11,800,552

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Internet from space

    Simon Kassing, Debopam Bhattacherjee, André Baptista Águas, Jens Eirik Saethre, and Ankit Singla. 2020. Exploring the" Internet from space" with Hypatia. InProceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement conference. 214–229

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Hemani Kaushal, VK Jain, and Subrat Kar. 2017. Acquisition, tracking, and pointing. InFree Space Optical Communication. Springer, 119–137

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Zeqi Lai, Hewu Li, Yangtao Deng, Qian Wu, Jun Liu, Yuanjie Li, Jihao Li, Lixin Liu, Weisen Liu, and Jianping Wu. 2023. {StarryNet}: empowering researchers to evaluate futuristic integrated space and terrestrial networks. In20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23). 1309–1324

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Zeqi Lai, Hewu Li, and Jihao Li. 2020. Starperf: Characterizing network performance for emerging mega-constellations. In2020 IEEE 28th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 1–11

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Ali Lalbakhsh, Andrew Pitcairn, Kaushik Mandal, Mohammad Alibakhshikenari, Karu P Esselle, and Sam Reisenfeld

    work page

  32. [32]

    Darkening low-earth orbit satellite constellations: A review.IEEE Access10 (2022), 24383–24394

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Yuanjie Li, Yimei Chen, Jiabo Yang, Jinyao Zhang, Bowen Sun, Lixin Liu, Hewu Li, Jianping Wu, Zeqi Lai, Qian Wu, et al. 2025. Small-scale LEO Satellite Networking for Global-scale Demands. InProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2025 Conference. 917–931

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Sami Ma, Yi Ching Chou, Haoyuan Zhao, Long Chen, Xiaoqiang Ma, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2023. Network characteristics of leo satellite constellations: A starlink-based measurement from end users. InIEEE INFOCOM 2023-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1–10

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Sat Magazine. 2021. The Bandwidth Of The StarLink Constellation...and the assessment of its potential subscriber base in the USA. http://www.satmagazine.com/story.php?number=1026762698. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Simple Maps. 2026. Cities Databases by Country. https://simplemaps.com/resources/free-country-cities

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    Joseph Mclaughlin, Jee Choi, and Ramakrishnan Durairajan. 2023. × grid: A location-oriented topology design for LEO satellites. InProceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on LEO Networking and Communication. 37–42

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Nitinder Mohan, Andrew E Ferguson, Hendrik Cech, Rohan Bose, Prakita Rayyan Renatin, Mahesh K Marina, and Jörg Ott. 2024. A multifaceted look at starlink performance. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. 2723–2734

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Chien-Chun Ni, Yu-Yao Lin, Jie Gao, Xianfeng David Gu, and Emil Saucan. 2015. Ricci curvature of the internet topology. In2015 IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM). IEEE, 2758–2766

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    OneWeb. 2026. OneWeb. https://www.eutelsat.com/satellite-network/oneweb-leo-constellation. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Liang Qiao, Hongcheng Yan, Xiaoyi Zhou, Yong Xu, Luyuan Wang, and Xin Wen. 2023. Onboard centralized isl-building planning for leo satellite constellation networks.Electronics12, 3 (2023), 635

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Ye Qin, Jingchao Wang, Yang Shi, Haiying Huang, Junxu Li, Weijian Liu, Tinghui Chen, and Jinghui Qin. 2025. PR- CapsNet: Pseudo-Riemannian Capsule Network with Adaptive Curvature Routing for Graph Learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08218(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Weiwu Ren, Bingsen Wang, Jie Sun, and Yu Hong. 2025. Inter-satellite link allocation in low-earth-orbit mega- constellation networks: W. Ren et al.The Journal of Supercomputing81, 11 (2025), 1163

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    World Population Review. 2025. Largest Cities by Population 2025. https://worldpopulationreview.com/cities

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Space Rocker. [n. d.]. Starlink Block v1.5. https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/starlink-v1-5.html. Accessed: 2026-01-07. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: January 2026. Starfield: Demand-Aware Satellite Topology Design for Low-Earth Orbit Mega Constellations 23

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Joarder Jafor Sadique, Imtiaz Nasim, and Ahmed S Ibrahim. 2025. Link Scheduling in Satellite Networks via Machine Learning Over Riemannian Manifolds.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society(2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Loqman Salamatian, Scott Anderson, Joshua Matthews, Paul Barford, Walter Willinger, and Mark Crovella. 2022. Curvature-based analysis of network connectivity in private backbone infrastructures.Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems6, 1 (2022), 1–32

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Rik Sarkar, Xiaotian Yin, Jie Gao, Feng Luo, and Xianfeng David Gu. 2009. Greedy routing with guaranteed delivery using ricci flows. In2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, 121–132

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Bodong Shang, Shuo Zhang, and Zi Jing Wong. 2025. Channel modeling and rate analysis of optical inter-satellite link (OISL).IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology(2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Claude E Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication.The Bell system technical journal27, 3 (1948), 379–423

    work page 1948

  51. [51]

    Rashed Shelim and Ahmed S Ibrahim. 2022. Geometric machine learning over riemannian manifolds for wireless link scheduling.IEEE Access10 (2022), 22854–22864

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Space. [n. d.]. SpaceX makes Starlink internet service free for people hit by hurricanes Helene and Milton. https: //www.space.com/spacex-starlink-free-2024-hurricane-helene-milton. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Starlink. 2024. Improving Starlink’s Latency. https://starlink.com/public-files/StarlinkLatency.pdf?srsltid= AfmBOorwzyvh46ieLM09JriQgQnv8H_im8fONujZCYTXqXwn9j-8AJRG. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink. http://starlink.com. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink Availability Map. https://starlink.com/map. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink Beam Switching. https://starlink.com/updates/starlink-beam-switching. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink emergency response. https://starlink.com/emergency-response. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink maritime. https://starlink.com/business/maritime. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  59. [59]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink Network Update. https://starlink.com/updates/network-update?srsltid= AfmBOoryNfg7gNAanc6--pnIcbFzxJg0N41TK-VJetxFgj9LxbHeQQux. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink Specifications. https://starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1470-99699-90?srsltid=AfmBOooA- b5AlV8JPle6LLLVhSc1gpfBKmFAIumuNXYO2tDPBZYRK5kZ. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    Starlink. 2026. Starlink Technology. https://starlink.com/technology. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    2023.Parameterization of Features on Spherical Surfaces

    Douglas M Trent, Zachary R Yahn, Conor A Nixon, and John W Santerre. 2023.Parameterization of Features on Spherical Surfaces. Technical Report. NASA

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Wei Wang, Yongli Zhao, Yuanjian Zhang, Xinyi He, Yue Liu, and Jie Zhang. 2022. Intersatellite laser link planning for reliable topology design in optical satellite networks: A networking perspective.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management19, 3 (2022), 2612–2624

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Wikipedia. [n. d.]. Earth-centered inertial. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth-centered_inertial. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    work page 2026

  65. [65]

    2001.Internetworking with satellite constellations

    Lloyd Wood. 2001.Internetworking with satellite constellations. University of Surrey (United Kingdom)

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    Zhenyu Xiao, Junyi Yang, Tianqi Mao, Chong Xu, Rui Zhang, Zhu Han, and Xiang-Gen Xia. 2022. LEO satellite access network (LEO-SAN) toward 6G: Challenges and approaches.IEEE Wireless Communications31, 2 (2022), 89–96

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Junyi Yang, Bo Li, Kexin Fan, Lirong An, and Qinyu Zhang. 2024. Analysis of Laser Inter-Satellite Links and Topology Design for Mega-Constellation Networks.IEEE Internet of Things Journal(2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Qinyu Zhu, Haicheng Tao, Yanhua Cao, and Xinhong Li. 2022. Laser inter-satellite link visibility and topology optimization for mega constellation.Electronics11, 14 (2022), 2232. A Geometrical Calculations A.1 Vector Field Geometrical Components To compute the geodesic on a sphere between two points 𝑝 and 𝑞, with position vectors ®𝑝 and ®𝑞, we first determ...

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Another technical difficulty that arises is that it is possible for only a subset of the satellites to be connected in the above construction

    The length of the newly added connections is at most𝑅/2. Another technical difficulty that arises is that it is possible for only a subset of the satellites to be connected in the above construction. When choosing a large grid spacing (𝑅/2, which is ≫ 1/𝜌), the density of intersection points on the grid is smaller than 𝜌. This forces some of the satellite...

    work page 2026