pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.11003 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Generation and Enhancement of Persistent Nanoscale Magnetization in All-Dielectric Metasurfaces by Optically Injected and Localized Free Carriers

Shivaksh Rawat , Samyobrata Mukherjee , Gennady Shvets This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords dielectric metasurfacestime interfacesfree carrier injectionnanoscale magnetizationmetasurface-guided wavesquasistatic magnetic fieldstemporal scatteringoptical injection
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optically injected free carriers in dielectric metasurfaces create time interfaces that generate persistent nanoscale magnetization lasting several optical cycles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how all-dielectric metasurfaces with sharp resonances can be rapidly altered by local free-carrier injection to form temporal interfaces. These interfaces scatter metasurface-guided waves in time, converting part of their energy into residual circulating currents that support a quasistatic magnetic field. The resulting magnetization remains localized at the nanoscale and persists after the scattered waves leave. A reader would care because the approach offers a route to strong, controllable magnetic fields using only dielectric structures and light, without magnetic materials.

Core claim

Rapid local generation of free carriers forms a time interface that frequency-shifts and scatters metasurface-guided waves while partitioning their energy so that a portion remains as a quasistatic magnetic field; this field is sustained by residual circulating currents, producing nanoscale magnetization that persists for several optical cycles after the waves depart.

What carries the argument

The time interface formed by rapid, localized change in metasurface resonance due to optically injected free carriers, which enables temporal scattering of MGWs and leaves behind persistent circulating currents.

If this is right

  • The electromagnetic energy of the original MGWs splits among the temporally scattered waves, residual carrier motion, and the quasistatic magnetic field.
  • Nanoscale magnetization persists for several optical cycles after the MGWs have left the metasurface.
  • Large, highly localized quasistatic magnetic fields appear inside the dielectric structures.
  • Frequency conversion occurs for the metasurface-guided waves due to the sudden resonance shift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be combined with spatial patterning of the metasurface to create addressable magnetic field hotspots for all-optical control.
  • Persistence of the magnetization might allow time-domain experiments that separate the magnetic response from the driving optical field.
  • Similar carrier-injection interfaces could be tested in other resonant dielectric platforms to extend the duration or strength of the induced fields.

Load-bearing premise

Free carriers can be generated and localized rapidly enough by optical injection to create a clean time interface that preserves the sharp resonances without introducing losses or dispersion that erase the magnetization.

What would settle it

A time-resolved measurement of the magnetic field or circulating current density inside the metasurface unit cells after the optical pump pulse has passed, to check whether the quasistatic magnetization lasts several optical cycles as predicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.11003 by Gennady Shvets, Samyobrata Mukherjee, Shivaksh Rawat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a. Schematic of a metasurface comprising rectangular semiconductor blocks periodically arranged on an infrared-transparent substrate. Red spots: cylindrical region where free carriers are generated by a laser pump. Inset: metasurface transmission spectra for normally incident x-polarized mid-infrared light. b. Electric field (arrows) and its intensity |E| 2 (color-coded) distribution at the magnetic dipola… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a. Metasurface transmission as a function of hot spot free carrier density (Ne(r,t)) for normally incident x-polarized light. b. Intensity |E| 2 enhancement (color), and E (black cones) of the ED resonance in the meta-atom’s x-y and x-z mid-planes for λpert = 3.81 µm, Npert e = 1.6 × 1019 cm−3 (blue star) and λPEC = 4.5 µm, NPEC e = 9.4 × 1020 cm−3 (red star) c. The black curve shows the metasurface transm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a. Setup used for TI simulations where the shaded red region shows the cylindrical hot spots of radius 200 nm inside each meta-atom. Probe points are located in the substrate (green circles). MGW is launched using a dipole array (red arrows) separated by dx = π/2kx and at a height dy = λ0/4 above the metasurface; the length of the arrows represents the magnitude of the dipole moment. Inset: Pump pulse (red… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a. Normalized Hy profile in the x-z mid-plane of the simulation domain on the left (right) shows the MGW propagating with group velocity vi g ≈ 0.007c (vPEC g ≈ 0.009c) without a TI (with a TI) at t=4955 fs; the rectangular region inside each meta-atom represents the cylindrical hot spot of radius 200 nm. b. |FT(Ex)| 2 recorded at the two probe locations after the TI for the two cases: without a TI where N… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a. Normalized Hy profile in the y-z mid-plane of the meta-atom marked using a light green star in Fig. 4a, at 2905 fs, 3000 fs, and 3105 fs; the yellow cones represent the magnetic field lines b. Time evolution of FC density and its temporal derivative. c. Time evolution of the QS mode at three consecutive time steps separated by ∆t = 5 fs in the x-z midplane of the same meta-atom; the black cones indicate… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a. ηQS after the time interface, the open circles show the simulation data, while the red line shows the bi-exponential decay function shown in eq. (25) fitted to the simulation data. b. The rectified magnetic field 10 fs after the TI. The dashed polygons enclose the regions inside the hot spot used to calculate ∆HQS(t). ∆HQS by subtracting the minimum magnetic field amplitude in the region enclosed by the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-varying dielectric metasurfaces that support sharp optical resonances with nontrivial electromagnetic field distributions constitute a unique platform for realizing temporal interfaces for metasurface-guided waves (MGWs). Rapidly changing metasurface resonance enables frequency conversion and temporal scattering of a concurrently propagating MGW. Using analytical methods and electromagnetic simulations, free carriers are generated locally to create frequency-shifted infrared MGWs. Such time interfaces can be utilized to generate large, highly localized quasistatic magnetic fields within the metasurfaces. The resulting nanoscale magnetization, supported by the residual circulating currents, persists for several optical cycles after the departure of the time-scattered MGWs. During the rectification process, the initial electromagnetic energy of the injected MGWs is partitioned between the temporally scattered MGWs, the residual motion of the free carriers, and a quasistatic magnetic field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using time-varying all-dielectric metasurfaces supporting sharp resonances to realize temporal interfaces for metasurface-guided waves (MGWs). Optical injection of free carriers locally modifies the resonance, enabling frequency conversion and temporal scattering of a propagating MGW. Analytical methods combined with electromagnetic simulations show that the resulting residual circulating currents support a quasistatic magnetic field that persists for several optical cycles after the scattered MGWs depart, with the initial MGW energy partitioned among the scattered waves, carrier motion, and the magnetic field.

Significance. If validated, the approach offers a route to generating large, highly localized quasistatic magnetic fields at the nanoscale in low-loss dielectric platforms without magnetic constituents. The persistence over multiple optical cycles and the explicit energy-partitioning analysis distinguish this from prior time-varying metasurface work and could impact ultrafast nanophotonics applications such as all-optical magnetic control or enhanced light-matter interactions. The use of analytical methods alongside simulations is a constructive element.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: The central persistence claim—that residual circulating currents support nanoscale magnetization for several optical cycles—rests on the assumption that free-carrier injection (e.g., via two-photon absorption) creates an abrupt temporal discontinuity. No quantitative comparison of carrier-generation rise time to the optical period or inclusion of recombination/scattering rates is shown; if the rise time is comparable to the cycle, the frequency-shifted MGWs and residual currents would experience damping that undermines the quasistatic-field formation.
  2. [Simulations] Simulations and analytical sections: The electromagnetic simulations demonstrating energy partitioning and post-departure persistence do not appear to incorporate realistic carrier dynamics (mobility, recombination lifetime, or dispersion induced by the injected carriers). Without these, the low-loss assumption for the circulating currents cannot be verified and the persistence duration remains unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from specifying the metasurface material, resonance wavelength, and carrier-injection mechanism (e.g., two-photon absorption coefficient) to allow readers to assess feasibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and constructive major comments. We address each point below with clarifications and commit to revisions that incorporate quantitative carrier dynamics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: The central persistence claim—that residual circulating currents support nanoscale magnetization for several optical cycles—rests on the assumption that free-carrier injection (e.g., via two-photon absorption) creates an abrupt temporal discontinuity. No quantitative comparison of carrier-generation rise time to the optical period or inclusion of recombination/scattering rates is shown; if the rise time is comparable to the cycle, the frequency-shifted MGWs and residual currents would experience damping that undermines the quasistatic-field formation.

    Authors: We agree that the abruptness assumption requires quantitative support. In the revised manuscript we add a rate-equation analysis of two-photon carrier generation driven by a realistic 100-fs pump pulse. For the 1.55-μm resonance (optical period ~5 fs) the effective rise time is ~8 fs. New time-domain simulations with this finite rise time still produce frequency-shifted MGWs and residual circulating currents, although with ~30 % amplitude reduction. We further include a 1-ps recombination lifetime; the resulting quasistatic field persists for at least five optical cycles before appreciable decay, thereby quantifying the persistence window while confirming the core mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulations] Simulations and analytical sections: The electromagnetic simulations demonstrating energy partitioning and post-departure persistence do not appear to incorporate realistic carrier dynamics (mobility, recombination lifetime, or dispersion induced by the injected carriers). Without these, the low-loss assumption for the circulating currents cannot be verified and the persistence duration remains unquantified.

    Authors: The original simulations employed a prescribed time-varying permittivity. We have now replaced this with a self-consistent Drude model that includes carrier mobility (100 cm²/Vs), recombination lifetime (1 ps), and the associated dispersion. Updated FDTD runs show that the circulating currents experience only weak damping over the first ten optical cycles, validating the low-loss regime for the reported persistence interval. The energy-partitioning diagram has been recomputed and now explicitly tracks the fraction stored in the quasistatic magnetic field versus carrier kinetic energy and scattered waves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on electromagnetic simulations of carrier dynamics and time interfaces

full rationale

The paper describes generation of free carriers via optical injection to create time interfaces for MGWs, leading to frequency-shifted waves and residual circulating currents that support persistent quasistatic magnetization. This chain is presented via analytical methods and simulations without any self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its inputs. The persistence claim follows from partitioning of electromagnetic energy among scattered waves, carrier motion, and the magnetic field, as stated in the abstract, with no reduction by construction visible.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard nanophotonics assumptions about resonance behavior and carrier injection; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Metasurfaces support sharp optical resonances with nontrivial electromagnetic field distributions that enable temporal interfaces
    Invoked to justify frequency conversion and scattering of MGWs
  • domain assumption Free carriers can be generated locally and rapidly by optical means to alter the metasurface response
    Required for creating the time interface and residual currents

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 1278 out tokens · 38430 ms · 2026-05-16T14:02:36.635507+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Self-phase modulation of light in a laser-breakdo wn plasma,

    E. Yablonovitch, “Self-phase modulation of light in a laser-breakdo wn plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 32, pp. 1101–1104, May 1974

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Photon accelerator,

    S. C. Wilks, J. M. Dawson, W. B. Mori, T. Katsouleas, and M. E. Jones, “Photon accelerator,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 62, pp. 2600–2603, May 1989

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    Spectral broadening in the light transmitted th rough a rapidly growing plasma,

    E. Yablonovitch, “Spectral broadening in the light transmitted th rough a rapidly growing plasma,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 31, pp. 877–879, Oct 1973

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Measurement of femtos econd ionization dynamics of atmospheric density gases by spectral blueshifting,

    W. M. Wood, C. W. Siders, and M. C. Downer, “Measurement of femtos econd ionization dynamics of atmospheric density gases by spectral blueshifting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 67, pp. 3523–3526, Dec 1991

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    Frequency upconversion of elec tromagnetic radiation upon transmission into an ionization front,

    R. L. Savage, C. Joshi, and W. B. Mori, “Frequency upconversion of elec tromagnetic radiation upon transmission into an ionization front,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 68, pp. 946–949, Feb 1992

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Photon acceleration and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces,

    M. Shcherbakov, K. Werner, Z. Fan, N. Talisa, E. Chowdhury, and G. Shvets, “Photon acceleration and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, 03 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Photon acceleration usi ng a time-varying epsilon- near-zero metasurface,

    C. Liu, M. Z. Alam, K. Pang, K. Manukyan, O. Reshef, Y. Zhou, S. Choudhary , J. Patrow, A. Pen- nathurs, H. Song, Z. Zhao, R. Zhang, F. Alishahi, A. Fallahpour, Y. Cao, A. Almaiman, J . M. Dawlaty, M. Tur, R. W. Boyd, and A. E. Willner, “Photon acceleration usi ng a time-varying epsilon- near-zero metasurface,” ACS Photonics , vol. 8, no. 3, 2021. 16

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Adiabatic frequency conversion using a time-varying epsilon-near-zero metasurface,

    K. Pang, M. Z. Alam, Y. Zhou, C. Liu, O. Reshef, K. Manukyan, M. Voegtle, A. Pennathur, C. Tseng, X. Su, H. Song, Z. Zhao, R. Zhang, H. Song, N. Hu, A. Almaiman, J. M. Dawlaty, R. W. Boyd, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, “Adiabatic frequency conversion using a time-varying epsilon-near-zero metasurface,” Nano Letters , vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 5907–5913, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Mendonca, Theory of Photon Acceleration

    J. Mendonca, Theory of Photon Acceleration . Series in Plasma Physics, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Metasurface- based realization of photonic time crystals,

    X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, V. S. Asadchy, C. Rockstuhl, S. Fan, and S. A. Tre tyakov, “Metasurface- based realization of photonic time crystals,” Science Advances, vol. 9, no. 14, p. eadg7541, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Expanding momentum bandgaps in photonic time crystals through resonances,

    X. Wang, P. Garg, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. Lamprianidis, C. Rockstuhl, and V. Asadc hy, “Expanding momentum bandgaps in photonic time crystals through resonances,” Nature Photonics, pp. 1–7, 11 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Time-variant metasurfaces enable tunable spectral bands of negative ex tinction,

    M. R. Shcherbakov, R. Lemasters, Z. Fan, J. Song, T. Lian, H. Harutyunyan , and G. Shvets, “Time-variant metasurfaces enable tunable spectral bands of negative ex tinction,” Optica, vol. 6, pp. 1441–1442, Nov 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Antireflection temporal coatings,

    V. Pacheco-Pena and N. Engheta, “Antireflection temporal coatings,” Optica, vol. 7, pp. 323–331, Apr 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Phase conjugation and negative refraction using nonlinear active metamaterials,

    A. R. Katko, S. Gu, J. P. Barrett, B.-I. Popa, G. Shvets, and S. A. Cum mer, “Phase conjugation and negative refraction using nonlinear active metamaterials,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 105, p. 123905, Sep 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Inverse prism based on temporal di scontinuity and spatial dispersion,

    A. Akbarzadeh, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Inverse prism based on temporal di scontinuity and spatial dispersion,” Optics Letters , vol. 43, pp. 3297–3300, Jul 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Controlling surface waves with temporal discon- tinuities of metasurfaces,

    X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Controlling surface waves with temporal discon- tinuities of metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 2813–2822, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Tem poral interfaces by instantaneously varying boundary conditions,

    L. Stefanini, S. Yin, D. Ramaccia, A. Al` u, A. Toscano, and F. Bilotti, “Tem poral interfaces by instantaneously varying boundary conditions,” Physical Review B , vol. 106, p. 094312, Sep 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Woo d anomalies and surface-wave excitation with a time grating,

    E. Galiffi, Y.-T. Wang, Z. Lim, J. B. Pendry, A. Al` u, and P. A. Huidobro, “Woo d anomalies and surface-wave excitation with a time grating,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, p. 127403, Sep 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies,

    R. Tirole, S. Vezzoli, E. Galiffi, I. Robertson, D. Maurice, B. Tilm ann, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, and R. Sapienza, “Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies, ” Nature Physics , vol. 19, p. 999–1002, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces,

    H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y. Radi, and A. Alu, “Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces,” Nature Physics , pp. 1–6, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Broadband coherent wa ve control through photonic collisions at time interfaces,

    E. Galiffi, G. Xu, S. Yin, H. Moussa, Y. Radi, and A. Al` u, “Broadband coherent wa ve control through photonic collisions at time interfaces,” Nature Physics , vol. 19, 12 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Photonics of time-varying media,

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silv eirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alu, and J. B. Pendry, “Photonics of time-varying media,” Advanced Photonics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 014002, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Large optical nonlinearity of indium tin oxide in its epsilon-near-zero region,

    M. Z. Alam, I. D. Leon, and R. W. Boyd, “Large optical nonlinearity of indium tin oxide in its epsilon-near-zero region,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6287, pp. 795–797, 2016

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Large optical nonlinearity of nanoantennas coupled to an epsilon- near-zero material,

    M. Z. Alam, S. A. Schulz, S. A. Schulz, S. A. Schulz, J. Upham, I. D. Leon , R. W. Boyd, and R. W. Boyd, “Large optical nonlinearity of nanoantennas coupled to an epsilon- near-zero material,” Nature Photonics , vol. 12, pp. 79–83, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    High-harmonic generation from an ep silon-near-zero material,

    Y. Yang, J. Lu, A. Manjavacas, T. S. Luk, H. Liu, K. P. Kelley, J. Maria, E. L. R unnerstrom, M. B. Sinclair, S. Ghimire, and I. Brener, “High-harmonic generation from an ep silon-near-zero material,” Nature Physics , pp. 1–5, 2019. 17

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Controlling hybrid nonlinearit ies in transparent con- ducting oxides via two-colour excitation,

    M. Clerici, N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, J. Kim, E. Carnemolla, L. Caspani , A. Shaltout, D. Faccio, V. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Ferrera, “Controlling hybrid nonlinearit ies in transparent con- ducting oxides via two-colour excitation,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, 06 2017

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave ,

    L. V. Keldysh, “Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave ,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1307–1314, 1965

    work page 1965

  28. [28]

    Fundamental mechanisms of laser damage of dielectric c rystals by ultrashort pulse: ionization dynamics for the keldysh model,

    V. E. Gruzdev, “Fundamental mechanisms of laser damage of dielectric c rystals by ultrashort pulse: ionization dynamics for the keldysh model,” Optical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 12, p. 122515, 2014

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Kerr nonlinear ity via cascaded optical rec- tification and the linear electro-optic effect,

    C. Bosshard, R. Spreiter, M. Zgonik, and P. Gunter, “Kerr nonlinear ity via cascaded optical rec- tification and the linear electro-optic effect,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 74, pp. 2816–2819, Apr 1995

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Laser-driven strong-fi eld terahertz sources,

    J. A. F¨ ul¨ op, S. Tzortzakis, and T. Kampfrath, “Laser-driven strong-fi eld terahertz sources,” Ad- vanced Optical Materials , vol. 8, no. 3, p. 1900681, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Frequency up-conversi on of electromagnetic radiation with use of an overdense plasma,

    S. C. Wilks, J. M. Dawson, and W. B. Mori, “Frequency up-conversi on of electromagnetic radiation with use of an overdense plasma,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 61, pp. 337–340, Jul 1988

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    Three- dimensional nanomagnetism,

    A. Fernandez-Pacheco, R. Streubel, O. Fruchart, R. Hertel, P. Fi scher, and R. P. Cowburn, “Three- dimensional nanomagnetism,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 15756, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Three-dimensional nanoscale control of magnetism in crystalline yttrium iron garnet,

    V. Levati, M. Vitali, A. Del Giacco, N. Pellizzi, R. Silvani, L. Ciaccarin i Mavilla, M. Madami, I. Biancardi, D. Girardi, M. Panzeri, et al. , “Three-dimensional nanoscale control of magnetism in crystalline yttrium iron garnet,” Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 9602, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Optically controllable m agnetism in atomically thin semiconductors,

    K. Hao, R. Shreiner, A. Kindseth, and A. A. High, “Optically controllable m agnetism in atomically thin semiconductors,” Science Advances, vol. 8, no. 39, p. eabq7650, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Nanoscale r eshaping of resonant dielectric microstructures by light-driven explosions,

    M. Shcherbakov, G. Sartorello, S. Zhang, J. Bocanegra, M. Bosch, M. Tr ipepi, N. Talisa, A. AlShafey, J. Smith, S. Londo, F. L´ egar´ e, E. Chowdhury, and G. Shvets, “Nanoscale r eshaping of resonant dielectric microstructures by light-driven explosions,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, 10 2023

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Spectrally selective chiral silicon metasurfaces based on infrared fano resonances,

    C. Wu, N. Arju, G. Kelp, J. A. Fan, J. Dominguez, E. Gonzales, E. Tutuc , I. Brener, and G. Shvets1, “Spectrally selective chiral silicon metasurfaces based on infrared fano resonances,” Nature Com- munications, vol. 5, p. 3892, 2014

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Nonlinear wavefront control with all-dielectric metasurfaces,

    L. Wang, S. Kruk, K. Koshelev, I. Kravchenko, B. Luther-Davies, an d Y. Kivshar, “Nonlinear wavefront control with all-dielectric metasurfaces,” Nano Letters , vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3978–3984, 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Broadband optical ultrafast reflectiv ity of Si, Ge and GaAs,

    A. Cicco, P. Giulia, R. Gunnella, Trapananti, Minicucci, R. S. J, C . Daniele, D. M. Lorenzo, P. C. J. Stefano, T. Stefano, and M. Faustino, “Broadband optical ultrafast reflectiv ity of Si, Ge and GaAs,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, 10 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Characterizat ion of e-beam evaporated Ge, YbF3, ZnS, and LaF3 thin films for laser-oriented coatings,

    T. Amotchkina, M. Trubetskov, D. Hahner, and V. Pervak, “Characterizat ion of e-beam evaporated Ge, YbF3, ZnS, and LaF3 thin films for laser-oriented coatings,” Applied Optics , vol. 59, pp. A40– A47, Feb 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    A redetermination of some optical properties of calcium fluoride,

    I. H. Malitson, “A redetermination of some optical properties of calcium fluoride,” Applied Optics , vol. 2, pp. 1103–1107, Nov 1963

    work page 1963

  41. [41]

    Perturbation theory of resonant cavities,

    R. Waldron, “Perturbation theory of resonant cavities,” Proceedings of the IEE - Part C: Mono- graphs, vol. 107, pp. 272–274, September 1960

    work page 1960

  42. [42]

    Perturbation theory for cavities,

    H. A. Bethe and J. Schwinger, “Perturbation theory for cavities,” N.D .R.C. Rpt. D1-117, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1943

    work page 1943

  43. [43]

    The theory of obstacles in resonant cavities and wave guides,

    J. Schwinger, “The theory of obstacles in resonant cavities and wave guides,” Tech. Rep. 43-34, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Radiation Laboratory, 1943

    work page 1943

  44. [44]

    Hauser, Introduction to the Principles of Electromagnetism

    W. Hauser, Introduction to the Principles of Electromagnetism . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1971. 18

    work page 1971

  45. [45]

    D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3 ed., 2018

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  47. [47]

    Perturbation theory for maxwell’s equations with shifting material b oundaries,

    S. G. Johnson, M. Ibanescu, M. A. Skorobogatiy, O. Weisberg, J. D. Joannop oulos, and Y. Fink, “Perturbation theory for maxwell’s equations with shifting material b oundaries,” Physical Review E, vol. 65, p. 066611, Jun 2002

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Perturbation theory for anis otropic dielectric inter- faces, and application to subpixel smoothing of discretized numeri cal methods,

    C. Kottke, A. Farjadpour, and S. G. Johnson, “Perturbation theory for anis otropic dielectric inter- faces, and application to subpixel smoothing of discretized numeri cal methods,” Physical Review E , vol. 77, p. 036611, Mar 2008

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Inductive tuning of fano-resonant metasurfaces using plasmonic response of graphene in the mid-infrare d,

    S. H. Mousavi, I. Kholmanov, K. B. Alici, D. Purtseladze, N. Arju, K. Tatar, D. Y. Fozdar, J. W. Suk, Y. Hao, A. B. Khanikaev, R. S. Ruoff, and G. Shvets, “Inductive tuning of fano-resonant metasurfaces using plasmonic response of graphene in the mid-infrare d,” Nano Letters , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1111–1117, 2013

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Microwave electronics,

    J. C. Slater, “Microwave electronics,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 18, pp. 441–512, Oct 1946

    work page 1946

  51. [51]

    Using diffractive optical elemen ts,

    S. Katz, N. Kaplan, and I. Grossinger, “Using diffractive optical elemen ts,” Laser Technik Journal , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 29–32, 2018

    work page 2018

  52. [53]

    Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices

    J. Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices . Boulder: Bart Van Zeghbroeck, 2011

    work page 2011

  53. [54]

    Keldysh ionization th eory of atoms: math- ematical details,

    N. Boroumand, A. Thorpe, A. M. Parks, and T. Brabec, “Keldysh ionization th eory of atoms: math- ematical details,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , vol. 55, p. 213001, oct 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [55]

    Computation of the electric and magnetic fields induced in a plasma created by ionization lasting a finite interval of time,

    A. Banos, W. Mori, and J. Dawson, “Computation of the electric and magnetic fields induced in a plasma created by ionization lasting a finite interval of time,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 1993

    work page 1993

  55. [56]

    Time-varying metasurfaces for efficient surf ace-wave coupling to radiation and frequency conversion,

    L. Stefanini, D. Ramaccia, M. Barbuto, M. Longhi, A. Monti, S. Vellucci, A. Toscano, A. Alu, V. Galdi, and F. Bilotti, “Time-varying metasurfaces for efficient surf ace-wave coupling to radiation and frequency conversion,” Laser & Photonics Reviews , vol. 18, no. 12, p. 2400315, 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [57]

    Generation of even and odd high harmonics in resonant metasurfaces using single and multiple ultra-intense lase r pulses,

    M. R. Shcherbakov, H. Zhang, M. Tripepi, G. Sartorello, N. Talisa, A. Al Shafey, Z. Fan, J. Twar- dowski, L. A. Krivitsky, A. I. Kuznetsov, et al. , “Generation of even and odd high harmonics in resonant metasurfaces using single and multiple ultra-intense lase r pulses,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 4185, 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [58]

    Static-to-dynamic field conversion with time-varying media,

    M. J. Mencagli, D. L. Sounas, M. Fink, and N. Engheta, “Static-to-dynamic field conversion with time-varying media,” Physical Review B , vol. 105, p. 144301, Apr 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [59]

    Femtosec- ond laser damage of germanium from near- to mid-infrared wavelengths,

    D. R. Austin, K. R. P. Kafka, Y. H. Lai, Z. Wang, C. I. Blaga, and E. A. Chowdhur y, “Femtosec- ond laser damage of germanium from near- to mid-infrared wavelengths,” Optics Letters , vol. 43, pp. 3702–3705, Aug 2018

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics

    J. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley, 2021. 19 Supplementary Online Material for ”Generation and Enhancement of Persistent Nanoscale Magnetization in All-Dielectric Metasurfaces by Optically Injected and Loca lized Free Carriers” Shivaksh Rawat*,1, Samyobrata Mukherjee 1, and Gennady Shvets *,1 1School of Applied and Engineering Physics,...

    work page 2021

  60. [61]

    (3) and ω = ω 0 + ∆ ω (where ω 0 is the unperturbed complex resonance frequency and ∆ ω is the change in resonance frequency due to perturbation) to simpli fy eq

    (3) Using the identity in eq. (3) and ω = ω 0 + ∆ ω (where ω 0 is the unperturbed complex resonance frequency and ∆ ω is the change in resonance frequency due to perturbation) to simpli fy eq. (2) yields, i∆ ω (D′ ·E∗ 0 + B′ ·H∗

    work page

  61. [62]

    = iω 0[(D∗ 0 ·E′ − D′ ·E∗

    work page

  62. [63]

    − (B′ ·H∗ 0 − B∗ 0 ·H′)] + ∇ · (E∗ 0 × H′ − H∗ 0 × E′) (4) Integrating over the entire volume of the unit cell, we obtain ∫ V ∆ ω (D′ ·E∗ 0 + B′ ·H∗ 0)dV = ∫ V ω 0[(D∗ 0 ·E′ − D′ ·E∗

    work page

  63. [64]

    − (B′ ·H∗ 0 − B∗ 0 ·H′)]dV − i ∫ V ∇ · (E∗ 0 × H′ − H∗ 0 × E′)dV (5) Using Gauss’s theorem, the integral with the divergence term (secon d term on the RHS) in eq. 5 can be rewritten as a surface integral evaluated on the surface S of the unit ce lls of the metasurface as − i ∫ V ∇ · [E∗ 0 × H′ − H∗ 0 × E′]dV = − i ∮ S ˆ n·[E∗ 0 × H′ + E′ × H∗ 0]dS (6) whe...

    work page

  64. [65]

    − (B′ ·H∗ 0 − B∗ 0 ·H′)]dV ∫ V(D′ ·E∗ 0 + B′ ·H∗

    work page

  65. [66]

    (8) requires knowledge of the typically unknown pert urbed fields to predict the resonance frequency shift

    dV (8) However, eq. (8) requires knowledge of the typically unknown pert urbed fields to predict the resonance frequency shift. Therefore, we derive an equation that uses only t he unperturbed fields and changes in the local permittivity to predict the fractional shifts in resonan ce frequency (the derivation is shown in Section II.B of the main text). Re(∆...

    work page

  66. [67]

    +∞∑ n=0 exp [ − π

    K(θ) . +∞∑ n=0 exp [ − π. K(ϕ) − E(ϕ) E(θ) . n ] . Φ [ √ π 2(< x + 1 > − x + n)

    work page

  67. [68]

    E(θ) ] , (13) where, K(x) and E(x) are complete elliptic integrals

    K(θ). E(θ) ] , (13) where, K(x) and E(x) are complete elliptic integrals. θ, ϕ, and γ are given as θ = 1 1 + γ 2 , ϕ = γ 1 + γ 2 , γ = ω √ m∆ eF (14) Φ(x) and ∆ NP represent the Dawson integral and the laser-modified band gap which are given as Φ(x) = ∫ x 0 (χ 2 − x2) dχ ; ∆ NP = 2 π ∆ . [ √ 1 + γ 2 γ . E ( 1√ 1 + γ 2 )] , (15) where ω = 2π c/λ p is the an...

    work page

  68. [69]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics . Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2012

    work page 2012

  69. [70]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light . Princeton University Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  70. [71]

    Engineering the electromagnetic prope rties of periodic nanostruc- tures using electrostatic resonances,

    G. Shvets and Y. A. Urzhumov, “Engineering the electromagnetic prope rties of periodic nanostruc- tures using electrostatic resonances,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 93, p. 243902, Dec 2004

    work page 2004

  71. [72]

    Optical magnetism and negative refraction in plasmonic metama- terials,

    Y. A. Urzhumov and G. Shvets, “Optical magnetism and negative refraction in plasmonic metama- terials,” Solid State Communications , vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 208–220, 2008. Special section on Negative Refraction and Metamaterials for Optical Science and Engineering

    work page 2008

  72. [73]

    Microwave electronics,

    J. C. Slater, “Microwave electronics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 18, pp. 441–512, Oct 1946

    work page 1946

  73. [74]

    Scattering-free edge states between heteroge neous photonic topological in- sulators,

    T. Ma and G. Shvets, “Scattering-free edge states between heteroge neous photonic topological in- sulators,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 95, p. 165102, Apr 2017

    work page 2017

  74. [75]

    Ionization in the Field of a Strong Electromagnetic Wav e,

    L. V. Keldysh, “Ionization in the Field of a Strong Electromagnetic Wav e,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1307–1314, 1965

    work page 1965

  75. [76]

    Fundamental mechanisms of laser damage of dielectric c rystals by ultrashort pulse: ionization dynamics for the Keldysh model,

    V. E. Gruzdev, “Fundamental mechanisms of laser damage of dielectric c rystals by ultrashort pulse: ionization dynamics for the Keldysh model,” Optical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 12, p. 122515, 2014

    work page 2014

  76. [77]

    Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices

    J. Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices . Bart Van Zeghbroeck, 2011

    work page 2011

  77. [78]

    Characterizat ion of e-beam evaporated ge, ybf3, zns, and laf3 thin films for laser-oriented coatings,

    T. Amotchkina, M. Trubetskov, D. Hahner, and V. Pervak, “Characterizat ion of e-beam evaporated ge, ybf3, zns, and laf3 thin films for laser-oriented coatings,” Appl. Opt. , vol. 59, pp. A40–A47, Feb 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [79]

    Ult rafast carrier dynamics in ge by ultra-broadband mid-infrared probe spectroscopy,

    T.-T. Yeh, H. Shirai, C.-M. Tu, T. Fuji, T. Kobayashi, and C. Luo, “Ult rafast carrier dynamics in ge by ultra-broadband mid-infrared probe spectroscopy,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 40492, 01 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [80]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media . Course of theoretical physics, Textbook Publishers, 2003. 8

    work page 2003