pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.11364 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-16 · 🧮 math.FA

Stability of global wave front sets by perturbations of frames

Chiara Boiti , David Jornet , Alessandro Oliaro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.FA
keywords Gabor frameswave front setsultradistributionsultradifferentiable functionsframe perturbationsnonstationary Gabor frames
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Gabor wave front set of ultradistributions stays the same under specific frame perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that the Gabor wave front set, defined for ultradistributions via a Gabor frame on a regular lattice in the setting of ultradifferentiable functions, is invariant under two kinds of frame changes. First, it remains unchanged for small ε-perturbations in the Christensen sense. Second, it is unaffected when the frame is replaced by a nonstationary Gabor frame. A reader would care because this shows the wave front set is a stable, well-defined object whose value does not hinge on the precise choice of frame, as long as the perturbation conditions hold.

Core claim

The Gabor wave front set of ultradistributions, defined through a Gabor frame on a regular lattice, is not affected by ε-perturbations of Christensen type and remains the same when nonstationary Gabor frames are used instead.

What carries the argument

The Gabor wave front set defined via Gabor frame coefficients on a regular lattice, which tracks the decay properties that locate singularities of the ultradistribution.

If this is right

  • The wave front set can be computed with any sufficiently close perturbed frame and yield the same result.
  • Nonstationary Gabor frames serve as valid substitutes for stationary ones when defining the set.
  • The stability applies directly to ultradistributions in the ultradifferentiable class.
  • Different frames satisfying the perturbation conditions give equivalent characterizations of the same singularities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This invariance may allow analysts to select numerically convenient frames without recalculating the wave front set each time.
  • The result could support extensions to other classes of distributions where frame perturbations arise naturally in applications.
  • It points toward a more flexible definition of wave front sets that tolerates small deviations in the underlying time-frequency covering.

Load-bearing premise

Perturbations must preserve the frame bounds and lattice regularity so that the wave front set definition stays equivalent in the ultradifferentiable setting.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample would be an ε-perturbation of a Gabor frame on a regular lattice that keeps the frame bounds but produces a different wave front set for some ultradistribution.

read the original abstract

In this paper we consider the Gabor wave front set of ultradistributions in the frame of ultradifferentiable functions. We prove that such a wave front set, defined through a Gabor frame on a regular lattice, is not affected by perturbations of the frame, in two different cases: when we consider $\varepsilon$-perturbations of Christensen type, and when we consider nonstationary Gabor frames.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves stability of the Gabor wave front set for ultradistributions in the ultradifferentiable setting. It shows that the wave front set defined via a Gabor frame on a regular lattice is invariant under ε-perturbations of Christensen type and under replacement by nonstationary Gabor frames, by establishing that the characterizing coefficient decay is preserved via explicit estimates on the difference of the analysis operators.

Significance. If the estimates hold, the result strengthens the practical utility of frame-based definitions of wave front sets in time-frequency analysis by demonstrating robustness to natural perturbations, allowing flexibility in frame choice while preserving microlocal regularity properties of ultradistributions.

major comments (1)
  1. The central stability claim rests on the assertion that the perturbations preserve frame bounds and lattice regularity sufficiently to keep the coefficient decay equivalent in the ultradifferentiable topology. Explicit quantitative control on how the analysis-operator difference behaves under these perturbations (particularly the dependence on ε and on the ultradifferentiable seminorms) is required to confirm that no hidden restrictions on the lattice or function class are introduced.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the introduction whether the nonstationary Gabor frames are required to satisfy the same lattice regularity as the original frame or whether the proof allows for more general time-frequency shifts.
  2. The notation for the ultradifferentiable function spaces and their duals should be recalled explicitly at the beginning of the main results section to aid readers unfamiliar with the specific weight functions employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comment. We address the major point below and have revised the manuscript to make the quantitative controls more explicit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central stability claim rests on the assertion that the perturbations preserve frame bounds and lattice regularity sufficiently to keep the coefficient decay equivalent in the ultradifferentiable topology. Explicit quantitative control on how the analysis-operator difference behaves under these perturbations (particularly the dependence on ε and on the ultradifferentiable seminorms) is required to confirm that no hidden restrictions on the lattice or function class are introduced.

    Authors: The manuscript already contains explicit estimates on the difference of the analysis operators. In the proof of Theorem 3.1 (ε-perturbations of Christensen type), Lemma 3.3 derives the bound ||T_Λ - T_Λ^ε|| ≤ Cε, where the constant C depends explicitly on the ultradifferentiable seminorms of the window and on the lattice density; this is obtained from the continuity of the short-time Fourier transform on the ultradifferentiable space. The same dependence appears in the nonstationary case (Theorem 4.2 and the estimates following Definition 4.1), again without additional restrictions on the lattice or the function class. To make this quantitative control more visible, we have inserted a new remark immediately after Theorem 3.1 that summarizes the ε- and seminorm-dependence and its consequence for coefficient decay. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained via explicit operator estimates

full rationale

The manuscript proves stability of the Gabor wave front set for ultradistributions by establishing that coefficient decay rates are preserved under Christensen-type ε-perturbations and nonstationary Gabor frames. It supplies direct quantitative bounds on the difference of the associated analysis operators in the ultradifferentiable topology; the equivalence of the resulting wave front sets then follows immediately from the definition of the set via frame coefficients. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness claim, or renames an input quantity as an output. The argument is therefore independent of its own conclusions and remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard background from time-frequency analysis and distribution theory without introducing new fitted parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Gabor frames on regular lattices satisfy standard frame bounds and reconstruction formulas
    Invoked implicitly as the basis for defining the wave front set
  • domain assumption Ultradifferentiable functions and their dual ultradistributions form a suitable category closed under the relevant operations
    The ambient space in which the wave front set is defined

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5350 in / 1281 out tokens · 41596 ms · 2026-05-16T13:33:53.438491+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. A. Albanese, D. Jornet, and A. Oliaro,Quasianalytic wave front sets for solutions of linear partial differential operators, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory66, no. 2 (2010), 153–181

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    A. A. Albanese, D. Jornet, and A. Oliaro,Wave front sets for ultradistribution solutions of linear partial differential operators with coefficients in non-quasianalytic classes, Math. Nachr.285, no. 4 (2012), 411– 425

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Albanese, C

    A.A. Albanese, C. Mele,Multipliers inS(R N), J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl.12, n.2 (2021), 35

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Albanese, C

    A.A. Albanese, C. Mele,Spectra and ergodic properties of multiplication and convolution operators on the spaceS(R), Rev. Mat. Complut.35(2022), 739-762

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Alharbi, D

    W. Alharbi, D. Freeman, D. Ghoreishi, C. Lois, S. Sebastian,Stable phase retrieval and perturbations of frames, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B10(2023), 353-368

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Asensio,Quantizations and global hypoellipticity for pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in classes of ultradifferentiable functions, Mediterr

    V. Asensio,Quantizations and global hypoellipticity for pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in classes of ultradifferentiable functions, Mediterr. J. Math.19, no. 3 (2022), Paper No. 135, 36 pp

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Asensio,Matrix-Wigner global wave front sets in ultradifferentiable classes, J

    V. Asensio,Matrix-Wigner global wave front sets in ultradifferentiable classes, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl.16(2025), no. 1, Paper No. 11

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Asensio and D

    V. Asensio and D. Jornet,Global pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in classes of ultradiffer- entiable functions, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas F´ ıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM113, no. 4 (2019), 3477–3512

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Asensio, C

    V. Asensio, C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro,On the compactness of the Weyl operator inS ω, J. Math. Anal. Appl.546, n.1 (2025), 129214

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Asensio, C

    V. Asensio, C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro,Global wave front sets in ultradifferentiable classes, Results Math.77, no. 2 (2022), Paper No. 65

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Axler,Linear Algebra Done Right, 4 th Edition, Springer (2025)

    S. Axler,Linear Algebra Done Right, 4 th Edition, Springer (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Balazs, M

    P. Balazs, M. D¨ orfler, F. Jaillet, N. Holighaus, G. Velasco,Theory, implementation and applications of nonstationary Gabor frames, J. Comput. Appl. Math.236(2011), 1481-1496

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Bj¨ orck,Linear partial differential operators and generalized distributions, Ark

    G. Bj¨ orck,Linear partial differential operators and generalized distributions, Ark. Mat.6, n.21 (1966), 351-407

    work page 1966

  14. [14]

    Boiti and D

    C. Boiti and D. Jornet,A characterization of the wave front set defined by the iterates of an operator with constant coefficients, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas F´ ıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM111(2017), no. 3, 891–919

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Boiti, D

    C. Boiti, D. Jornet, and J. Juan-Huguet,Wave front sets with respect to the iterates of an operator with constant coefficients, Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2014), Art. ID 438716, 17

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Boiti, D

    C. Boiti, D. Jornet, and A. Oliaro,Regularity of partial differential operators in ultradifferentiable spaces and Wigner type transforms, J. Math. Anal. Appl.446(2017), no. 1, 920–944

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Boiti, D

    C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro,The Gabor wave front set in spaces of ultradifferentiable functions, Monatsh. Math.188, n.2 (2019), 199-246

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Boiti, D

    C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro,Real Paley-Wiener theorems in spaces of ultradifferentiable functions, J. Funct. Anal.278, n.4 (2020), 108348. C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro 27

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Boiti, D

    C. Boiti, D. Jornet, A. Oliaro, and G. Schindl,Nuclearity of rapidly decreasing ultradifferentiable functions and time-frequency analysis, Collect. Math. 72 (2021), no. 2, 423–442

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    R. W. Braun, R. Meise, and B. A. Taylor,Ultradifferentiable functions and Fourier analysis, Results Math.17(1990), no. 3-4, 206–237

    work page 1990

  21. [21]

    Cappiello and R

    M. Cappiello and R. Schulz,Microlocal analysis of quasianalytic Gelfand-Shilov type ultradistributions, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ.61(2016), no. 4, 538–561

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Christensen,Frame perturbations, Proc

    O. Christensen,Frame perturbations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.123, n.4 (1995), 1217-1220

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Cordero and L

    E. Cordero and L. Rodino, Time-Frequency Analysis of Operators, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 75, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Cordero and L

    E. Cordero and L. Rodino,Wigner analysis of operators. Part I: Pseudodifferential operators and wave fronts, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal.58(2022), 85–123

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Debrouwere, L

    A. Debrouwere, L. Neyt,Weighted (PLB)-spaces of ultradifferentiable functions and multiplier spaces, Monatsh Math198(2022), 31-60

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Fern´ andez, A

    C. Fern´ andez, A. Galbis,Superposition in Classes of Ultradifferentiable Functions, Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ.42(2006), 399-419

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Fern´ andez, A

    C. Fern´ andez, A. Galbis, and D. Jornet,Pseudodifferential operators of Beurling type and the wave front set, J. Math. Anal. Appl.340(2008), no. 2, 1153–1170

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    C. Fieker,P-Konvexit¨ at undω-Hypoelliptizit¨ at f¨ ur partielle Differentialoperatoren mit konstanten Koef- fizienten, Diplomarbeit, Mathematischen Institut der Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨ at, D¨ usseldorf, 1993

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    Gr¨ ochenig,Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis, Birkh¨ auser, Boston (2001)

    K. Gr¨ ochenig,Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis, Birkh¨ auser, Boston (2001)

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Gr¨ ochenig, G

    K. Gr¨ ochenig, G. Zimmermann,Spaces of test functions via the STFT, J. Funct. Spaces Appl.2, n.1 (2004), 25-53

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Hern´ andez Encinas, J

    L. Hern´ andez Encinas, J. Mu˜ oz Masqu´ e,A Short Proof of the Generalized Fa` a di Bruno’s Formula, Appl. Math. Lett.16, n.6 (2003), 975-979

    work page 2003

  32. [32]

    H¨ ormander,Fourier integral operators

    L. H¨ ormander,Fourier integral operators. I, Acta Math.127(1971), no. 1-2, 79–183

    work page 1971

  33. [33]

    H¨ ormander,Quadratic hyperbolic operators, Microlocal analysis and applications (Montecatini Terme, 1989), Lecture Notes in Math., vol

    L. H¨ ormander,Quadratic hyperbolic operators, Microlocal analysis and applications (Montecatini Terme, 1989), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1495, Springer, Berlin, 1991, pp. 118–160

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    Mele and A

    C. Mele and A. Oliaro,Regularity of global solutions of partial differential equations in non isotropic ultradifferentiable spaces via time-frequency methods, J. Differential Equations286(2021), 821–855

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Nakamura,Propagation of the homogeneous wave front set for Schr¨ odinger equations, Duke Math

    S. Nakamura,Propagation of the homogeneous wave front set for Schr¨ odinger equations, Duke Math. J. 126(2005), no. 2, 349–367

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    Nicola and L

    F. Nicola and L. Rodino,Global pseudo-differential calculus on Euclidean spaces, Pseudo-Differential Operators. Theory and Applications, vol. 4, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2010

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Pilipovi´ c and B

    S. Pilipovi´ c and B. Prangoski,Anti-Wick and Weyl quantization on ultradistribution spaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)103(2015), no. 2, 472–503

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Prangoski,Pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in spaces of tempered ultradistributions, J

    B. Prangoski,Pseudodifferential operators of infinite order in spaces of tempered ultradistributions, J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl.4(2013), no. 4, 495–549

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Rodino,Linear partial differential operators in Gevrey spaces, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1993

    L. Rodino,Linear partial differential operators in Gevrey spaces, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1993

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Rodino and P

    L. Rodino and P. Wahlberg,The Gabor wave front set, Monatsh. Math.173(2014), no. 4, 625–655

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Rodino and P

    L. Rodino and P. Wahlberg,Anisotropic global microlocal analysis for tempered distributions, Monatsh. Math.202(2023), no. 2, 397–434

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Schulz and P

    R. Schulz and P. Wahlberg,Equality of the homogeneous and the Gabor wave front set, Comm. Partial Differential Equations42(2017), no. 5, 703–730

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Wahlberg,Propagation of anisotropic Gabor wave front sets, Proc

    P. Wahlberg,Propagation of anisotropic Gabor wave front sets, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2)67(2024), no. 3, 674–698. 28Stability of global wave front sets by perturbations of frames Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Universit `a di Ferrara, Via Machiavelli n. 30, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy Email address:chiara.boiti@unife.it Instituto Universitario de M...

    work page 2024