Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing

As of 5 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 66 of 66 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2601.18061.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2601.18061 v3

Coverage vector

measured 66 of 66 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-16T11:46:09.108129Z

measured 67 of 67 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-05T04:18:54.595022Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-05T04:18:56.704885Z

Reference resolution

66 of 66 outbound references displayed

verified exact1
verified fuzzy57
unresolved8
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 89705895-d623-41a1-9534-e24224803783 · outbound

This paper cites Clinician-Rated Severity of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Clinician-Rated Severity of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.788739Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 0adde6b6-9e29-4ee8-8ce8-dee16e65a5ba · outbound

This paper cites DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.802673Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 1e4bec4c-d8b2-4dc8-90c3-a88efc156446 · outbound

This paper cites DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53330–53342.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53330–53342

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.797026Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 05f8dcd9-93a8-4a4b-b3a1-d00b890fe36c · outbound

This paper cites Truth Is a Lie: Crowd Truth and the Seven Myths of Human Annotation.AI Magazine, 36(1):15–24.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Truth Is a Lie: Crowd Truth and the Seven Myths of Human Annotation.AI Magazine, 36(1):15–24

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.799885Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation e9922f6e-93e3-40d3-b196-7528be7f4d82 · outbound

This paper cites Crowd Truth: Harnessing Disagreement in Crowdsourcing a Relation Extraction Gold Standard.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Crowd Truth: Harnessing Disagreement in Crowdsourcing a Relation Extraction Gold Standard

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.777957Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 4e6e9d3c-fcdb-419a-8271-a99241af5c35 · outbound

This paper cites Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, and Jared Kaplan.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, and Jared Kaplan

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.775559Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation f2e61751-f922-45ee-9b08-979a55795f70 · outbound

This paper cites Bech.Clinical Psychometrics.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bech.Clinical Psychometrics

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.794378Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 0d376012-b765-4928-8354-102339370c21 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.791417Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 55997058-543a-4706-a361-f2c18a69573d · outbound

This paper cites Consensus report of the apa work group on neuroimaging markers of psychiatric disorders.Am Psychiatr Assoc.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Consensus report of the apa work group on neuroimaging markers of psychiatric disorders.Am Psychiatr Assoc

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.771018Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 940f40b0-d336-49c5-9f1a-d098a446facc · outbound

This paper cites Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.785997Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation e77b00b4-e418-4355-9ed3-960f0ca0f5cd · outbound

This paper cites Minton, Abigail Lott, and Jinho D.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Minton, Abigail Lott, and Jinho D

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.780735Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 5c35b276-3251-4a8b-8e82-3ed483f4f883 · outbound

This paper cites Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.692465Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation d5270066-a82f-4590-87f7-3912b967b006 · outbound

This paper cites How people use chatgpt.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing How people use chatgpt

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.641532Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation e7ba2d63-d3bf-49e4-ad8a-1ce5804a2c25 · outbound

This paper cites Predicting Depression via Social Media.International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1):128–137.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Predicting Depression via Social Media.International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1):128–137

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.653085Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 28ab72d8-fa4f-4ac1-9997-2d9a277ac1fd · outbound

This paper cites Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.650228Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 4e60b9a8-85f4-4021-bc97-fbed1d805f31 · outbound

This paper cites Cicchetti.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Cicchetti

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.661356Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 5f765e66-41fa-4f04-b2a7-08f9b4020713 · outbound

This paper cites Hashimoto.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Hashimoto

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.658470Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 793adfb1-7bd6-409d-8b4c-9fad441839d2 · outbound

This paper cites Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Am Psychiatric Assoc, 21(21):591–643.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Am Psychiatric Assoc, 21(21):591–643

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.735587Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 792b627f-be36-4f30-ae29-b1e0dac0468b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.282324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 212b9a9d-18d0-4aca-8802-7d3bbb48e4a0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.624465Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 598aa3da-0aeb-4af6-9d2c-1e2b4133470f · outbound

This paper cites Can AI relate: Testing large language model response for mental health support.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Can AI relate: Testing large language model response for mental health support

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.633249Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation b3d75980-8685-4f1f-b133-7e00f5295efc · outbound

This paper cites Impact of preference noise on the alignment performance of generative language models.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Impact of preference noise on the alignment performance of generative language models

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.704854Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 942edd00-ba09-4dff-8d65-bcc7949576ee · outbound

This paper cites Blind spots and biases: Exploring the role of annotator cognitive biases in NLP.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Blind spots and biases: Exploring the role of annotator cognitive biases in NLP

Reference 23

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.619087Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 26db7dd9-5be6-4967-b51f-cec76322a12d · outbound

This paper cites Goodman, Lawrence H.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Goodman, Lawrence H

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.639057Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 027577f7-8577-4fcc-9c3a-e8e95fbf536f · outbound

This paper cites Gordon, Michelle S.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Gordon, Michelle S

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.723443Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 38e14316-48b9-4210-b0e8-dcd5e5fc5685 · outbound

This paper cites Risks from language models for automated mental healthcare: Ethics and structure for implementation.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Risks from language models for automated mental healthcare: Ethics and structure for implementation

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.768121Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation f73d4089-4f83-4d33-ab31-a800c9d1bae7 · outbound

This paper cites Human Feedback is not Gold Standard.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Human Feedback is not Gold Standard

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.689018Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 98fac7e5-2c51-4c5d-a5ba-31b4f65ba2b9 · outbound

This paper cites How LLM counselors violate ethical standards in mental health practice: A practitioner-informed framework.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing How LLM counselors violate ethical standards in mental health practice: A practitioner-informed framework

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.783275Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 33cf71bc-79df-4819-ada5-1bedf766dccc · outbound

This paper cites Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.670029Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 428a34c9-6494-48b3-bc1d-ece9f3437232 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.701487Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation f48788c3-4db0-498f-addc-942c10481929 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.683843Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 65cf5188-ab62-47c4-a72b-a9555075c5e4 · outbound

This paper cites Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations.Human Communication Research, 30(3):411–433.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations.Human Communication Research, 30(3):411–433

Reference 32

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.655706Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 4f915837-2483-460e-bffe-798b41f4a387 · outbound

This paper cites Kunstman, Aaron Lulla, Monika Drummond Roots, Manu Sharma, Aryan Shrivastava, Nina Vasan, and Colleen Waickman.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Kunstman, Aaron Lulla, Monika Drummond Roots, Manu Sharma, Aryan Shrivastava, Nina Vasan, and Colleen Waickman

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.698419Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 257c5123-393b-483e-abc0-32495fe4c450 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.636158Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 8d28453c-fef4-4410-a4be-afee8f1fde6f · outbound

This paper cites Hashimoto.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Hashimoto

Reference 35

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.664401Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 4731ff42-453d-448c-b60a-aea94481133b · outbound

This paper cites Bunyi, Adam C.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bunyi, Adam C

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.627248Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation c6897c9c-874c-422a-8468-6affd4168880 · outbound

This paper cites Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study.Journal of Medical Internet Research AI, 3:e52095.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study.Journal of Medical Internet Research AI, 3:e52095

Reference 37

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.681405Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation bfae3754-10ce-452d-9296-72d1725222a7 · outbound

This paper cites A diagnostic meta-analysis of the patient health questionnaire-9 (phq-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.General hospital psychiatry, 37(1):67–75.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A diagnostic meta-analysis of the patient health questionnaire-9 (phq-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.General hospital psychiatry, 37(1):67–75

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.616428Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation fb3125eb-1f42-49fc-884e-8dea0af2abc7 · outbound

This paper cites McGraw and S.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing McGraw and S

Reference 39

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.678285Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation fc5bb067-0f13-4b44-9a31-6fe731312cf2 · outbound

This paper cites Ong, and Nick Haber.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Ong, and Nick Haber

Reference 40

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.686452Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 4d351919-2dd3-4888-99f0-6bac4c34a7b2 · outbound

This paper cites Moyers, Lauren N.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Moyers, Lauren N

Reference 41

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.647305Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 59346976-8a19-4392-a242-d53521eaf689 · outbound

This paper cites Department of Veterans Affairs.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Department of Veterans Affairs

Reference 42

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.739563Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 7b07b7ee-fa44-4bde-be7d-1099d2d3f527 · outbound

This paper cites NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales

Reference 43

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.720304Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 98ca2986-71ec-40ee-8239-f70dbe2cf385 · outbound

This paper cites Depression.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Depression

Reference 44

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.695200Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation fff6dc70-4901-4d49-8b6a-d778979de163 · outbound

This paper cites Enhancing mental health with artificial intelligence: Current trends and future prospects.Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 3:100099.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Enhancing mental health with artificial intelligence: Current trends and future prospects.Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 3:100099

Reference 45

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.732269Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 00113e04-ee5f-4e6f-ab52-b7563cfa53ba · outbound

This paper cites Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe

Reference 46

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.675515Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation d4b3fcbe-96fb-417e-9b84-6d5f98ee1736 · outbound

This paper cites Inherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:677–694.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Inherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:677–694

Reference 47

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.644545Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 70a2be2c-e2e5-49c6-b176-fb9157ec16cd · outbound

This paper cites Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models

Reference 48

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.672570Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 7ad7fdb4-d134-4f39-a202-dfbe0a93e440 · outbound

This paper cites Posner, D.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Posner, D

Reference 49

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.630361Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation ba9f5582-3a8e-4bf6-ba85-08a669a79415 · outbound

This paper cites Prochaska, Erin A.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Prochaska, Erin A

Reference 50

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.729386Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation e65ef78c-0a0e-4f46-a5cf-4677acdf2c8a · outbound

This paper cites Manning, and Chelsea Finn.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Manning, and Chelsea Finn

Reference 51

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.621831Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation b76de69a-9338-4b1e-b092-3f5d05798da4 · outbound

This paper cites Regier, William E.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Regier, William E

Reference 52

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.742505Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 04ef73ce-2388-4902-93be-9bdb52f0d312 · outbound

This paper cites Large language models as mental health resources: Patterns of use in the united states.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Large language models as mental health resources: Patterns of use in the united states

Reference 53

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.711024Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 98307c84-6c72-4814-8ecf-597ffa8652cd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 54

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.745311Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 50d4e86b-a636-44a0-a658-f91e3e379ab1 · outbound

This paper cites Lin, Adam S.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Lin, Adam S

Reference 55

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.762597Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation db133a62-4faa-41a7-82f7-d4b4065e615f · outbound

This paper cites A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Support.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Support

Reference 56

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.667265Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 752050e8-e4d8-4045-8ed3-b4cbd6a81428 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 57

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.707700Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 54393a32-3d9c-4bc0-aca0-aa974f33a79c · outbound

This paper cites Clinical Practice Guidelines on using artificial intelligence and gadgets for mental health and well-being.Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2):S414–S419.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Clinical Practice Guidelines on using artificial intelligence and gadgets for mental health and well-being.Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2):S414–S419

Reference 58

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.726521Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 6ab45c2b-2947-46ac-9713-ec7a1e4f1c37 · outbound

This paper cites Pfohl, Heather Cole-Lewis, Darlene Neal, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Schaekermann, Amy Wang, Dev Dash, Jonathan H.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Pfohl, Heather Cole-Lewis, Darlene Neal, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Schaekermann, Amy Wang, Dev Dash, Jonathan H

Reference 59

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.757209Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation f99fe2f6-d891-48eb-958a-008a368e67a1 · outbound

This paper cites Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano

Reference 60

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.717393Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation b4f3a450-f6f0-4bea-ae9a-071ef5658955 · outbound

This paper cites A Practical Guide to Fine-Tuning Language Models with Limited Data.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A Practical Guide to Fine-Tuning Language Models with Limited Data

Reference 61

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.714235Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation d00a5e5b-2d99-4f8a-987b-5806e4dab1c6 · outbound

This paper cites Lukoff, Keith Nuechterlein, R.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Lukoff, Keith Nuechterlein, R

Reference 62

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.754158Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 0d9e7534-5b1d-422a-a024-16efb4896549 · outbound

This paper cites Wang, Patricia Berglund, Mark Olfson, Harold A.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Wang, Patricia Berglund, Mark Olfson, Harold A

Reference 63

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.759924Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 750f9970-3b04-4c32-a787-ab37a9b73f95 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work

Reference 64

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.765353Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation e29dff42-8874-474f-8a6e-480b1e3c836b · outbound

This paper cites Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E

Reference 65

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.748254Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Observation 6c6a7069-3c34-4aa4-80cd-17125693c22f · outbound

This paper cites Cold plunges cure psychosis—stop your medication.

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Cold plunges cure psychosis—stop your medication

Reference 66

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.751327Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.

Pith citing papers

Observation cdf42a1e-2a34-4555-8b2b-3949d90c5286 · inbound

Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation cites this paper.

Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing

Reference 35

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T04:18:56.830854Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00.