Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Sharp bounds for non-trace class noise and applications to SPDEs

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper pins down an exact threshold under which a colored Gaussian series g∑γ_n μ_n f_n converges in Sobolev spaces of negative order, and shows the threshold is optimal.

desk verdict The sharp Sobolev-embedding result is probably right and important, but the general γ-Young inequality (Theorem 3.1) is false as stated, so the proof needs a kernel-specific repair before the main theorem is fully supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.19639 v3 pith:PVSLCSDR submitted 2026-01-27 math.PR math.APmath.FA

Antonio Agresti , Fabian Germ , Mark Veraar This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.APmath.FA MSC 60B1260H1546E3547B1060B1160G15
keywords Gaussianseriesnon-traceclassnoiseγ-radonifyingoperatorsSobolevembeddingsBesselpotentialspacesstochasticheatequationweightedsequenceMatérnrandomfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish exactly when a Gaussian series with a multiplicative weight g, a scalar coloring μ, and an orthonormal system f_n converges in the Bessel potential space H^{-s,q}. It claims one scaling condition, s/d + 1/q ≥ 1/η + 1/2 − 1/ζ, is both necessary and sufficient, where η measures the spatial integrability of g and ζ measures the summability of the coloring in a weighted sequence space weighted by the L^∞ norms of f_n. The significance is that this same threshold transfers to the stochastic heat equation, giving sharp regularity bounds for solutions with non-trace class noise. A sympathetic reader should see the paper as settling the borderline between convergence and divergence for the Gaussian object, and therefore the exact regularity of the associated SPDE solutions.

What carries the argument

Three tools carry the argument. First, the weighted sequence spaces ℓ^ζ(S_f), whose weights are the squared L^∞ norms of the orthonormal system; this interpolation weight is what makes the sharp scaling appear and is essential for the SPDE application. Second, the γ-Young inequality (Theorem 3.1), a γ-radonifying analog of Young's convolution inequality that uses the weak Lebesgue space L^{r,∞} for the kernel rather than L^r; this is what lets the argument handle the singular Bessel potential kernel. Third, bilinear complex interpolation between the two endpoint cases ζ=2 and ζ=∞ (Lemmas 4.4 and 4.5), which yields the full parameter range. For random fields on R^d, a Fourier-multiplier versi

What would settle it

Construct a concrete one-dimensional example for Theorem 3.1: take f(x)=|x|^{−a} with a chosen so that f lies in L^{r,∞} but not in L^r near the origin, and take g a smooth compactly supported bump. Compute the square function (Σ_k |A_{f,g} e_k|²)^{1/2} in L^q. If the result is infinite while weak-type Young places the convolution of |f|² and |g|² in L^{q/2,∞}, then the strong estimate claimed by the γ-Young inequality fails, and with it the ζ=∞ endpoint of the main theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For an open domain O ⊆ R^d, an orthonormal system S_f = (f_n), g ∈ L^η(O), and μ in the weighted sequence space ℓ^ζ(S_f) (with weight ||f_n||²_{L^∞}), the multiplication operator M_g followed by the coefficient operator R_μ is γ-radonifying from L²(O) into H^{-s,q}(O) whenever s/d + 1/q ≥ 1/η + 1/2 − 1/ζ and 1/η − 1/ζ < 1/2. Proposition 4.3 proves the first condition is necessary by applying the estimate only to rank-one operators and then rescaling; on R^d with homogeneous Sobolev spaces the condition becomes an equality. Thus the paper supplies a Sobolev embedding for Gaussian series that is sharp in the scaling sense, and interprets the result as a complete characterization of when colore

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on a γ-Young inequality that, at the step following Eq. (3.6), derives a strong L^{q/2} bound for a convolution from a weak-type Young inequality which supplies only a weak-type L^{q/2,∞} estimate; if that step cannot be justified, the ζ=∞ endpoint and every interpolated result that uses it lack support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the main theorem is correct, the stochastic heat equation with non-trace class noise has spatial regularity H^{1−s,q} and Besov regularity B^{1−s−2/p}_{q,p} precisely under the same scaling condition, with no extra summability assumptions on eigenvalues or eigenfunctions.
  • The rank-one necessity argument means the threshold is not an artifact of the proof: no other combination of smoothness, integrability, and coloring exponents can be relaxed while keeping the estimate true.
  • For eigenfunction expansions of the Dirichlet Laplacian on bounded smooth domains, the theorem recovers and extends the trace-class and white-noise regimes, and gives bounds in any dimension d without the restriction d < 6 that earlier arguments imposed.
  • The Fourier-multiplier version applies directly to Matérn-type random fields, giving the same scaling condition for the regularity of g times a Matérn field on R^d.
  • On the torus, the periodic analogue holds, and the identity operator is γ-radonifying from L² to H^{−s,q} if and only if s > d/2, which shows the ζ=∞ endpoint cannot be pushed further.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the necessity proof uses only rank-one operators, the threshold is likely universal for any bilinear setting where the coloring acts through an arbitrary bounded operator; one could test this by trying to replace R_μ with a general operator in the complex interpolation space between L(L²,L^∞) and L(L²).
  • The second condition 1/η − 1/ζ < 1/2 is left open: the paper does not prove necessity, and it might be possible to find a counterexample where the series converges even when that inequality fails, as long as the first scaling condition holds.
  • The γ-Young inequality's reliance on weak Lebesgue spaces suggests that the sharp endpoint may be valid only in a weak-type target space; if that is true, the same divergence would show up in the SPDE application as a loss of Besov regularity at criticality, with logarithmic corrections of the kind familiar from Brownian paths.
  • The Fourier-multiplier version hints at a testable extension: replacing the symbol m by a logarithmically modified symbol at criticality should move the random field out of the Bessel scale and into a Besov scale with the same scaling, mirroring the known dichotomy for space-time white noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of Gaussian series of the form g Σ γ_n μ_n f_n with values in Bessel potential spaces H^{-s,q}, generalizing Sobolev embedding for random sums. The main result (Theorem 4.1) gives a sufficient condition s/d + 1/q ≥ 1/η + 1/2 − 1/ζ, with a weighted ℓ^ζ(S_f) norm encoding the L^∞ growth of an orthonormal system, and Proposition 4.3 shows necessity by a rank-one scaling argument. The proof architecture is bilinear interpolation between two endpoints: the ζ=2 endpoint (Lemma 4.4, based on Sobolev embedding) and the ζ=∞ endpoint (Lemma 4.5, based on a claimed γ-Young inequality, Theorem 3.1). Applications are given to stochastic heat equations and Matern-type random fields, with comparisons to prior literature.

Significance. If correct, the results are significant: they give sharp scaling conditions for non-trace-class Gaussian noise in negative Sobolev spaces, allow arbitrary orthonormal systems, treat unbounded domains, and improve several existing bounds. The necessity proof via rank-one scaling and the interpolation framework are attractive. However, the central ζ=∞ endpoint rests on Theorem 3.1, whose proof is invalid and whose statement is false as written. Since Lemma 4.5 and the interpolation proof of Theorem 4.1 depend on it, the main results are not established in the present form. The paper may be repairable by proving a specialized version for Bessel/Riesz kernels, but that work remains to be done.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 3.1 and Eq. (3.6)] The proof of Theorem 3.1 is invalid. After Eq. (3.6), F=|f|^2 ∈ L^{r/2,∞} and G=|g|^2 ∈ L^{η/2} are convolved. The cited weak-type Young inequality gives only F∗G ∈ L^{q/2,∞}, not the claimed strong bound in L^{q/2}. This is not a harmless gap: the asserted strong estimate is false. For example, let 1<p<2, set r=η=2p and 1/q=1/p−1/2 (e.g. p=3/2, r=η=3, q=6). Take a union of N disjoint intervals of length l=N^{-3} with spacing ~N^{-2}, and set f=g=N^{1/p} on each interval. Then ∥f∥_{L^{r,∞}}=∥g∥_{L^{η,∞}}=1, but |f|^2∗|g|^2 is a sum of N^2 disjoint triangles of height ~N^{4/p}l and width ~l, with L^{q/2} norm comparable to N^{2−2/p}, which diverges. Thus A_{f,g} is not in γ(L^2,L^q) under the stated assumptions, contradicting Theorem 3.1.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Section 4.1] Propositions 3.2(1a) and 3.3 rely on Theorem 3.1 to control A_{G_s,g} and A_{R_s,g}, and Lemma 4.5 derives the ζ=∞ endpoint of the main theorem from Proposition 3.2(1a). Since Theorem 3.1 is false, these results are unproved. The Bessel and Riesz kernels have monotone radial decay, so a direct proof for these kernels might still be possible, but no such proof is provided. Consequently, the bilinear interpolation argument in the proof of Theorem 4.1 (§4.2), which uses Lemma 4.5 as one endpoint, does not establish Theorem 4.1 as it stands. The same applies to Theorem 4.2 and the SPDE applications in Section 6 that depend on these results.
  3. [Section 4.3, Proposition 4.8] The abstract interpolation statement in Proposition 4.8 inherits the same defect: its proof references the ζ=∞ endpoint Lemma 4.5. Even if the rest of the interpolation framework is coherent, the proposition is not supported until the endpoint estimate is proved for the relevant operators, or replaced by a correct specialized estimate.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, proof of Theorem 4.1] The existence check for admissible (η_1,q_1) is dense and somewhat informal; a more structured presentation, possibly with a diagram of the parameter regions, would improve readability.
  2. [Section 6.3.2, Eq. (6.15)] The notation B^{1-s}_{q,p}(O) is introduced only in the statement of Theorem 6.3; a forward reference in the comparison section would help readers not familiar with Besov spaces.
  3. [Global] There are a few typographical issues, e.g. 'applications to SPDEs' in the title is repeated in the abstract, and 'F ABIAN GERM' in the author line has inconsistent capitalization. These do not affect the mathematics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main estimate is derived from independent endpoint lemmas and standard harmonic-analysis tools; flagged issues are correctness gaps, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained and non-circular. Theorem 4.1 is obtained by bilinear complex interpolation between two endpoint cases: Lemma 4.4 (ζ=2), proved from Sobolev embeddings and the square-function characterization of γ-radonifying operators, and Lemma 4.5 (ζ=∞), which reduces through the ideal property to Proposition 3.2. Proposition 3.2 in turn reduces the multiplication-operator estimate to the convolution operator A_{G_s,g} via identity (3.11), and the central γ-Young inequality (Theorem 3.1) is proved by the Parseval/square-function reduction (3.6) followed by an application of weak-type Young's inequality. None of these steps defines the target norm in terms of itself, and no parameter is fitted to make the claimed estimate hold. The necessity result (Proposition 4.3) is established independently by rank-one operators and scaling, not derived from the sufficiency argument. Self-citations such as [48] (stochastic maximal L^p regularity), [3], and [49] are used as external tools and do not contain the target estimate as an assumption. The skeptical concern about Theorem 3.1—that the cited weak-type Young theorem may not justify the asserted strong L^{q/2} bound—is a potential correctness or proof-gap issue, not a circularity issue. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters were fitted; the only mathematical objects are standard function spaces and the weighted sequence space defined from the orthonormal system. The paper introduces no new physical entities.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Interpolation identities for L^p spaces, weighted ℓ^p spaces, Bessel potential spaces, and γ-radonifying spaces (Proposition 4.7).
    Accepted results from [38,39,40] used to interpolate the endpoint lemmas into Theorem 4.1.
  • standard math γ-Fubini theorem and the ideal property of γ-radonifying operators.
    Used throughout, from [39], to reformulate Gaussian series as γ-radonifying operators.
  • standard math Weak-type Young inequality for convolutions as cited from [31, Theorem 1.4.25].
    Used in the proof of Theorem 3.1; the paper applies it to obtain a strong L^{q/2} bound, which goes beyond the cited statement.
  • standard math Weyl law and sup-norm bounds for Dirichlet Laplacian eigenfunctions.
    Used in §1.2 and Theorem 6.2 to translate ℓ^ζ(S_f) conditions into eigenvalue-index asymptotics.
  • standard math Stochastic maximal L^p-regularity for the heat semigroup [48].
    External theorem used in §6.2 to turn the γ-radonifying estimates of Theorem 4.1 into SPDE mild-solution estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp bounds for non-trace class noise and applications to SPDEs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVSLCSDR

@misc{pith2026260119639,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp bounds for non-trace class noise and applications to SPDEs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVSLCSDR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.19639}
}
abstract

In the study of stochastic PDEs with colored, non-trace class space-time noise, one frequently encounters Gaussian series of the form $$g \sum_{n\geq 1} \gamma_n \mu_n f_n, $$ where $(\gamma_n)_{n}$ is a sequence of standard independent Gaussian variables, $g$ is an $L^\eta(\mathcal{O})$ function, $(\mu_n)_{n}$ is a sequence of scalars, and $(f_n)_n$ is an orthonormal system in $L^2(\mathcal{O})$ where $\mathcal{O} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ is an open set. In this manuscript, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the above sum to converge in Bessel potential spaces $H^{-s,q}(\mathcal{O})$. The latter can be interpreted as a Sobolev embedding for Gaussian series. Our main theorem is formulated using weighted sequence spaces that encode the $L^\infty$-growth of the orthonormal system $(f_n)_{n}$, a feature that is crucial for obtaining sharp estimates. We apply our results to the stochastic heat equation with additive non-trace class noise. In this case, our conditions capture the scaling relationship between the heat operator and the coloring of the noise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An optimal local theory for reaction-diffusion equations driven by non-trace-class noise

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Reaction-diffusion SPDEs with non-trace-class multiplicative noise are shown to be locally well-posed in critical Besov spaces of initial data, with regularization, blow-up criteria, and positivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Adler and J.E

    R.J. Adler and J.E. Taylor.Random fields and geometry.Springer Monogr. Math. New York, NY: Springer, 2007

    2007

  2. [2]

    Agresti, F

    A. Agresti, F. Germ, and M.C. Veraar. Stochastic reaction diffusion equations with non-trace class noise: local well-posedness and positivity. 2026

    2026

  3. [3]

    Agresti, N

    A. Agresti, N. Lindemulder, and M.C. Veraar. On the trace embedding and its applications to evolution equations.Mathematische Nachrichten, 296(4):1319–1350, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Stability properties of stochastic maximalL p-regularity.J. Math. Anal. Appl., 482(2):123553, 35, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear parabolic stochastic evolution equations in critical spaces part I. Stochastic maximal regularity and local existence.Nonlinearity, 35(8):4100–4210, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear parabolic stochastic evolution equations in critical spaces part II: Blow-up criteria and instataneous regularization.J. Evol. Equ., 22(2):Paper No. 56, 96, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Reaction-diffusion equations with transport noise and critical superlinear diffusion: Local well-posedness and positivity.J. Differential Equations, 368:247–300, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations for turbulent flows in critical spaces.Comm. Math. Phys., 405(2):Paper No. 43, 57, 2024

    2024

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear SPDEs and maximal regularity: an extended survey.NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 32(6):Paper No. 123, 150, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Auscher, N

    P. Auscher, N. Badr, R. Haller-Dintelmann, and J. Rehberg. The square root problem for second-order, diver- gence form operators with mixed boundary conditions onL p.J. Evol. Equ., 15(1):165–208, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Aziznejad and J

    S. Aziznejad and J. Fageot. Wavelet analysis of the Besov regularity of L´ evy white noise.Electron. J. Probab., 25:38, 2020. Id/No 158

    2020

  4. [12]

    B´ enyi and T

    ´A. B´ enyi and T. Oh. Modulation spaces, Wiener amalgam spaces, and Brownian motions.Adv. Math., 228(5):2943–2981, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Bergh and J

    J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om.Interpolation spaces. An introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223

    1976

  6. [14]

    Bl¨ omker and A

    D. Bl¨ omker and A. Schindler. Stochastic Cahn–Hilliard equation in higher space dimensions: the motion of bubbles.Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 71(2):49, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Cannizzaro and F

    G. Cannizzaro and F. Toninelli. Lecture notes on stationary critical and super-critical SPDEs.arXiv preprint:2403.15006, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Caravenna, R

    F. Caravenna, R. Sun, and N. Zygouras. From disordered systems to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08479, 2025. SHARP BOUNDS FOR NON-TRACE CLASS NOISE 35

    2025

  9. [17]

    S. Cerrai. Stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz reaction term. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 125(2):271–304, 2003

    2003

  10. [18]

    S. Cerrai. A Khasminskii type averaging principle for stochastic reaction–diffusion equations. 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    S. Cerrai. Averaging principle for systems of reaction-diffusion equations with polynomial nonlinearities per- turbed by multiplicative noise.SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 43(6):2482–2518, 2011

    2011

  12. [20]

    Cerrai, G

    S. Cerrai, G. Guatteri, and G. Tessitore. Nonlinear random perturbations of reaction-diffusion equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17094, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Cerrai and A

    S. Cerrai and A. Lunardi. Averaging principle for nonautonomous slow-fast systems of stochastic reaction- diffusion equations: the almost periodic case.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 49(4):2843–2884, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    Cerrai and M

    S. Cerrai and M. R¨ ockner. Large deviations for invariant measures of general stochastic reaction–diffusion systems.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 337(9):597–602, 2003

    2003

  15. [23]

    Cerrai and M

    S. Cerrai and M. R¨ ockner. Large deviations for stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz reaction term.Ann. Probab., 32(1B):1100–1139, 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    Cerrai and M

    S. Cerrai and M. R¨ ockner. Large deviations for invariant measures of stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz reaction term.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 41(1):69–105, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    Cioica, S

    P.A. Cioica, S. Dahlke, N. D¨ ohring, S. Kinzel, F. Lindner, T. Raasch, K. Ritter, and R.L. Schilling. Adaptive wavelet methods for the stochastic Poisson equation.BIT, 52(3):589–614, 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    Dahlke, S

    P.A Cioica, S. Dahlke, S. Kinzel, F. Lindner, T. Raasch, K. Ritter, and R.L. Schilling. Spatial Besov regularity for stochastic partial differential equations on Lipschitz domains.arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.1814, 2010

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. Cwikel. Weak type estimates for singular values and the number of bound states of Schr¨ odinger operators. Ann. of Math. (2), 106(1):93–100, 1977

    1977

  20. [28]

    R.C. Dalang. Extending martingale measure stochastic integral with applications to spatially homogeneous S.P.D.E’s.Electron. J. Probab., 4:29, 1999. Id/No 6

    1999

  21. [29]

    Daubechies.Ten lectures on wavelets, volume 61 ofCBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics

    I. Daubechies.Ten lectures on wavelets, volume 61 ofCBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1992

    1992

  22. [30]

    Fageot, A

    J. Fageot, A. Fallah, and M. Unser. Multidimensional L´ evy white noise in weighted Besov spaces.Stochastic Processes Appl., 127(5):1599–1621, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    L. Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

    2014

  24. [32]

    Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    L. Grafakos.Modern Fourier analysis, volume 250 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    D. Grieser. Uniform bounds for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on manifolds with boundary.Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 27(7-8):1283–1299, 2002

    2002

  26. [34]

    M. Hairer. An introduction to stochastic PDEs.arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.4178, 2009

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    H¨ ormander

    L. H¨ ormander. Estimates for translation invariant operators inL p spaces.Acta Math., 104:93–140, 1960

    1960

  28. [36]

    H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators III: Pseudo-differential operators

    L. H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators III: Pseudo-differential operators. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  29. [37]

    L. Hornung. Quasilinear parabolic stochastic evolution equations via maximalL p-regularity.Potential Anal., 50(2):279–326, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M

    T.P. Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach spaces. Vol. I. Martin- gales and Littlewood-Paley theory, volume 63 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. Springer, 2016

    2016

  31. [39]

    Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M

    T.P. Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach spaces. Vol. II. Prob- abilistic Methods and Operator Theory., volume 67 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge.Springer, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M

    T.P. Hyt¨ onen, J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach spaces. Vol. III. Har- monic analysis and spectral theory, volume 76 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. Springer, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Khoshnevisan.Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations, volume 119 ofCBMS Reg

    D. Khoshnevisan.Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations, volume 119 ofCBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math.Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    N.V. Krylov. An analytic approach to SPDEs. InStochastic partial differential equations: six perspectives, volume 64 ofMath. Surveys Monogr., pages 185–242. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  35. [43]

    Lang and C

    A. Lang and C. Schwab. Isotropic Gaussian random fields on the sphere: regularity, fast simulation and stochastic partial differential equations.Ann. Appl. Probab., 25(6):3047–3094, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Levitina, F

    G. Levitina, F. Sukochev, and D. Zanin. Cwikel estimates revisited.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 120(2):265– 304, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Lindgren, H

    F. Lindgren, H. Rue, and J. Lindstr¨ om. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach.J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, Stat. Methodol., 73(4):423– 498, 2011

    2011

  38. [46]

    Lunardi.Interpolation theory

    A. Lunardi.Interpolation theory. Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, second edition, 2009. 36 ANTONIO AGRESTI, F ABIAN GERM, AND MARK VERAAR

    2009

  39. [47]

    Mart ´ ınez Carracedo and M

    C. Mart ´ ınez Carracedo and M. Sanz Alix.The theory of fractional powers of operators, volume 187 ofNorth- Holland Math. Stud.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001

    2001

  40. [48]

    van Neerven, M.C

    J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L.W. Weis. Stochastic maximalL p-regularity.Ann. Probab., 40(2):788–812, 2012

    2012

  41. [49]

    van Neerven, M.C

    J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L.W. Weis. Stochastic integration in Banach spaces—a survey. In Stochastic analysis: a series of lectures, volume 68 ofProgr. Probab., pages 297–332. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Rasmussen and C.K.I

    C.E. Rasmussen and C.K.I. Williams.Gaussian processes for machine learning.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006

    2006

  43. [51]

    Rue and L

    H. Rue and L. Held.Gaussian Markov random fields. Theory and applications., volume 104 ofMonogr. Stat. Appl. Probab.Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2005

    2005

  44. [52]

    M. Salins. Existence and uniqueness for the mild solution of the stochastic heat equation with non-Lipschitz drift on an unbounded spatial domain.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ., Anal. Comput., 9(3):714–745, 2021

    2021

  45. [53]

    M. Salins. Global solutions for the stochastic reaction-diffusion equation with super-linear multiplicative noise and strong dissipativity.Electron. J. Probab., 27:17, 2022. Id/No 12

    2022

  46. [54]

    M. Salins. Global solutions to the stochastic reaction-diffusion equation with superlinear accretive reaction term and superlinear multiplicative noise term on a bounded spatial domain.Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 375(11):8083– 8099, 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    Sanz-Sol´ e and M

    M. Sanz-Sol´ e and M. Sarr` a. H¨ older continuity for the stochastic heat equation with spatially correlated noise. InSeminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications III: Centro Stefano Franscini, Ascona, September 1999, pages 259–268. Springer, 2002

    1999

  48. [56]

    Sawano.Theory of Besov spaces, volume 56 ofDevelopments in Mathematics

    Y. Sawano.Theory of Besov spaces, volume 56 ofDevelopments in Mathematics. Springer, Singapore, 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    Schnaubelt and M.C

    R. Schnaubelt and M.C. Veraar. Structurally damped plate and wave equations with random point force in arbitrary space dimensions.Differ. Integral Equ., 23(9-10):957–988, 2010

    2010

  50. [58]

    Schnaubelt and M.C

    R. Schnaubelt and M.C. Veraar. Stochastic equations with boundary noise. InParabolic problems. The Herbert Amann Festschrift. Based on the conference on nonlinear parabolic problems held in celebration of Herbert Amann ’s 70th birthday at the Banach Center in B¸ edlewo, Poland...

    2009

  51. [59]

    B. Simon. Analysis with weak trace ideals and the number of bound states of Schr¨ odinger operators.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 224(2):367–380, 1976

    1976

  52. [60]

    Simon.Trace ideals and their applications, volume 120 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs

    B. Simon.Trace ideals and their applications, volume 120 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2005

    2005

  53. [61]

    Stein.Interpolation of spatial data

    M.L. Stein.Interpolation of spatial data. Some theory for kriging. Springer Ser. Stat. New York, NY: Springer, 1999

    1999

  54. [62]

    Triebel.Theory of function spaces, volume 78 ofMonographs in Mathematics

    H. Triebel.Theory of function spaces, volume 78 ofMonographs in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1983

    1983

  55. [63]

    Triebel.Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators

    H. Triebel.Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators. Johann Ambrosius Barth, Heidelberg, second edition, 1995

    1995

  56. [64]

    M.C. Veraar. Regularity of Gaussian white noise on thed-dimensional torus. InMarcinkiewicz centenary volume, volume 95 ofBanach Center Publ., pages 385–398. Polish Acad. Sci. Inst. Math., Warsaw, 2011. Department of Mathematics Guido Castelnuovo, Sapienza University of Rome, P...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.