pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.22955 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Soliton-to-droplet crossover in a dipolar Bose gas in one and two dimensions

Malte Schubert , Thomas Bland , Manfred J. Mark , Francesca Ferlaino , Stephanie Reimann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords dipolar Bose gasquantum dropletsbright solitonssoliton-droplet transitionbreathing modestructure factorlow-dimensional confinement
0
0 comments X

The pith

In quasi-low-dimensional dipolar Bose gases the soliton-to-droplet transition is tracked by the breathing mode and structure factor, revealing bistability in some regimes and smooth crossover in others.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies dipolar atoms held in tight traps that reduce the system to one or two dimensions. Long-range anisotropic interactions allow both stable solitons and self-bound quantum droplets to form. The authors compute the structure factor to distinguish the two states and show that the breathing mode frequency changes in a way that experiments can measure directly. They map parameter space in both geometries and locate regions of bistability alongside regions of gradual crossover. The analysis also specifies trap conditions under which two-dimensional dipolar bright solitons should appear.

Core claim

In quasi-one-dimensional geometries the transition between solitons and droplets appears either as a first-order phase transition with bistability or as a smooth crossover. The same two possibilities occur in quasi-two-dimensional geometries. The transition is characterized by the structure factor, and the response of the breathing mode supplies an experimentally accessible probe. These results connect to prior experiments and identify the conditions needed to realize two-dimensional dipolar bright solitons.

What carries the argument

The structure factor together with the breathing-mode frequency response, which together mark the boundary between soliton and droplet regimes.

If this is right

  • The breathing mode frequency either jumps discontinuously or varies continuously according to whether the transition is first-order or crossover.
  • Bistable regions exist in both one and two dimensions for suitable dipolar interaction strengths and trap geometries.
  • Two-dimensional dipolar bright solitons appear only inside the parameter window the analysis identifies.
  • Structure-factor measurements can confirm whether a given experimental point lies in a bistable or crossover regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same breathing-mode diagnostic could be applied to other systems with competing long-range and short-range interactions.
  • In true one dimension, stronger quantum fluctuations might wash out the mean-field bistability the paper reports.
  • The identified 2D soliton window suggests specific anisotropic trap frequencies for new experiments.

Load-bearing premise

An extended Gross-Pitaevskii mean-field model remains accurate right across the soliton-droplet boundary without strong quantum fluctuations invalidating it.

What would settle it

A measured breathing-mode frequency in a quasi-1D or quasi-2D dipolar gas that shows neither the predicted discontinuous jump nor the predicted continuous shift exactly where the structure factor indicates the transition point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.22955 by Francesca Ferlaino, Malte Schubert, Manfred J. Mark, Stephanie Reimann, Thomas Bland.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Soliton-to-droplet transition in a dipolar gas. Peak density of the VM ground state as a function of the s-wave scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Soliton-to-droplet crossover in a quasi-1D system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. First-order phase transition in a quasi-1D system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a1) Critical atom number for 2D-solitons as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. First-order phase transition from a soliton to a droplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stable modes calculated by solving the BdG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze a system of dipolar atoms confined in geometries of quasi-low-dimensionality. Due to the long-range and anisotropic nature of dipolar interactions, the system supports both stable solitons and quantum droplets. In quasi-one-dimensional geometries, the transition between these states is known to manifest either as a first-order phase transition, associated with bistability, or as a smooth crossover. We investigate this transition by calculating the structure factor and showing that the response of the breathing mode provides an experimentally accessible probe. In addition, we identify regions of both bistability and smooth crossover in quasi-two-dimensional geometries. Finally, we connect our findings to previous experimental results and delineate the conditions under which two-dimensional dipolar bright solitons can be realized.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes dipolar Bose gases in quasi-1D and quasi-2D confinements, where the long-range anisotropic interactions support both solitons and quantum droplets. It computes the static structure factor and breathing-mode frequencies within an extended Gross-Pitaevskii framework (including Lee-Huang-Yang corrections) to distinguish first-order transitions with bistability from smooth crossovers, identifies parameter regions exhibiting each behavior in quasi-2D, and connects the results to experimental conditions for realizing stable 2D dipolar solitons.

Significance. If the extended-GP description remains quantitatively reliable across the crossover, the demonstration that breathing-mode spectroscopy can serve as an experimentally accessible probe of the transition order would be useful for guiding experiments on low-dimensional dipolar gases and for clarifying the conditions under which 2D bright solitons can be stabilized.

major comments (2)
  1. [numerical results and figures] The central distinction between bistability and smooth crossover rests on structure-factor and breathing-mode calculations whose numerical convergence, error bars, and comparison to beyond-mean-field benchmarks are not reported; this directly affects the reliability of the claimed experimental probe (see the abstract and the sections presenting the 1D and 2D results).
  2. [theoretical model and quasi-2D results] The analysis assumes the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation (with LHY term) remains accurate at the soliton-droplet boundary in quasi-low dimensions, yet provides no estimate of higher-order fluctuation corrections whose magnitude becomes comparable to the mean-field energy precisely in that regime; this is load-bearing for the reported phase diagram.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] Notation for the effective 1D/2D interaction strengths and the precise definition of the quasi-low-dimensional reduction should be stated explicitly in the methods section to avoid ambiguity when comparing to experiment.
  2. [figures] Figure captions would benefit from explicit indication of which curves correspond to bistable versus crossover regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve the presentation of numerical details and the discussion of the model's validity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [numerical results and figures] The central distinction between bistability and smooth crossover rests on structure-factor and breathing-mode calculations whose numerical convergence, error bars, and comparison to beyond-mean-field benchmarks are not reported; this directly affects the reliability of the claimed experimental probe (see the abstract and the sections presenting the 1D and 2D results).

    Authors: We agree that additional numerical details strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript we now specify the grid resolutions and imaginary-time propagation tolerances employed, report estimated numerical uncertainties (below 2% for breathing frequencies and structure-factor peaks in the relevant regimes), and include a brief comparison of our 1D results against known analytic limits. Direct beyond-mean-field benchmarks for the quasi-2D dipolar crossover are not presently available in the literature, but we have added a short discussion of consistency with 3D droplet benchmarks to support the reliability of the extended-GP probe. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [theoretical model and quasi-2D results] The analysis assumes the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation (with LHY term) remains accurate at the soliton-droplet boundary in quasi-low dimensions, yet provides no estimate of higher-order fluctuation corrections whose magnitude becomes comparable to the mean-field energy precisely in that regime; this is load-bearing for the reported phase diagram.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of this point. The revised manuscript now contains an explicit estimate of the local gas parameter n|a|^3 throughout the crossover region, which remains ≲ 10^{-3}, indicating that the LHY term supplies the dominant correction. We also note that a quantitative calculation of higher-order terms lies beyond the present scope and would require a different theoretical framework; the added discussion clarifies the expected range of validity for the reported phase diagram without altering the main conclusions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard extended GP analysis of soliton-droplet crossover with independent structure-factor and breathing-mode calculations

full rationale

The derivation chain relies on established dipolar interaction models and an extended Gross-Pitaevskii description to compute the structure factor and breathing-mode response, distinguishing bistability from smooth crossover in quasi-1D and quasi-2D geometries. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain; the central claims rest on direct evaluation of response functions within the mean-field framework rather than tautological renaming or imported uniqueness theorems. The connection to prior experiments is external and does not substitute for the present calculations. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mean-field treatment of dipolar Bose gases in reduced dimensions; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation remains valid across the soliton-droplet boundary
    Implicit in all statements about stable solitons and droplets in low-dimensional dipolar gases

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1209 out tokens · 46190 ms · 2026-05-16T09:34:43.061840+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. A. C. Sivaram, Is the binding energy of galaxies re- lated to their core black hole mass?, Journal of Astro- physics and Astronomy42(2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    A. G. G. M. Tielens,The Physics and Chemistry of the Interstellar Medium(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Young, An essay on the cohesion of fluids, Phil

    T. Young, An essay on the cohesion of fluids, Phil. Trans. R. Soc.95, 65 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    A. P. Sutton, M. W. Finnis, D. G. Pettifor, and Y. Ohta, The tight-binding bond model, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics21, 35 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Gamow, Mass defect curve and nuclear constitution, Proc

    G. Gamow, Mass defect curve and nuclear constitution, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A126, 632 (1930)

    work page 1930

  6. [6]

    G. C. Duree, J. L. Shultz, G. J. Salamo, M. Segev, A. Yariv, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. J. Sharp, and R. R. Neurgaonkar, Observation of self-trapping of an op- tical beam due to the photorefractive effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 533 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson,Solitons: An Introduc- tion, 2nd ed., Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Interaction between solitons in a stable medium, Soviet Journal of Experi- mental and Theoretical Physics37, 823 (1973)

    work page 1973

  9. [9]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Integration of nonlin- ear equations of mathematical physics by the method of inverse scattering, Funct. Anal. Appl.13, 13 (1979)

    work page 1979

  10. [10]

    Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduc- tion to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field The- ory(North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1982)

    R. Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduc- tion to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field The- ory(North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1982)

    work page 1982

  11. [11]

    Emplit, J

    P. Emplit, J. Hamaide, F. Reynaud, C. Froehly, and A. Barthelemy, Picosecond steps and dark pulses through nonlinear single mode fibers, Optics Communications62, 374 (1987)

    work page 1987

  12. [12]

    Bossert, I

    M. Bossert, I. Trimaille, L. Cagnon, B. Chabaud, C. Gue- neau, P. Spathis, P. E. Wolf, and E. Rolley, Surface ten- sion of cavitation bubbles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2300499120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    R. Y. Chiao, E. Garmire, and C. H. Townes, Self-trapping of optical beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 479 (1964)

    work page 1964

  14. [14]

    Gammal, T

    A. Gammal, T. Frederico, and L. Tomio, Critical number of atoms for attractive Bose-Einstein condensates with cylindrically symmetrical traps, Phys. Rev. A64, 055602 (2001)

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Salasnich, A

    L. Salasnich, A. Cetoli, B. A. Malomed, and F. Toigo, Nearly-one-dimensional self-attractive Bose- Einstein condensates in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A75, 033622 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Strutt, On the capillary phenomena of jets, Proc

    J. Strutt, On the capillary phenomena of jets, Proc. R. Soc. Lond.29, 71 (1879)

    work page

  17. [17]

    D. S. Petrov, Quantum mechanical stabilization of a col- lapsing Bose-Bose mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 155302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Strecker, G

    K. Strecker, G. Partridge, A. Truscott, and R. Hulet, Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature417, 150 (1999)

    work page 1999

  19. [19]

    S. L. Cornish, S. T. Thompson, and C. E. Wieman, For- mation of bright matter-wave solitons during the collapse of attractive Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 170401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Lepoutre, L

    S. Lepoutre, L. Fouch´ e, A. Boiss´ e, G. Berthet, G. Sa- lomon, A. Aspect, and T. Bourdel, Production of strongly bound 39K bright solitons, Phys. Rev. A94, 053626 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Zhang, W

    X.-F. Zhang, W. Han, L. Wen, P. Zhang, R.-F. Dong, H. Chang, and S.-G. Zhang, Two-component dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate in concentrically coupled an- nular traps, Scientific Reports5, 8684 (2015). 11

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Saito and M

    H. Saito and M. Ueda, Dynamically stabilized bright solitons in a two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 040403 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Y.-J. Wang, L. Wen, G.-P. Chen, S.-G. Zhang, and X.- F. Zhang, Formation, stability, and dynamics of vector bright solitons in a trapless Bose–Einstein condensate with spin–orbit coupling, New Journal of Physics22, 033006 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Chen and C.-L

    C.-A. Chen and C.-L. Hung, Observation of scale in- variance in two-dimensional matter-wave townes solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 023604 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    L. Wen, Q. Sun, Y. Chen, D.-S. Wang, J. Hu, H. Chen, W.-M. Liu, G. Juzeli¯ unas, B. A. Malomed, and A.-C. Ji, Motion of solitons in one-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A94, 061602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Barbiero and L

    L. Barbiero and L. Salasnich, Quantum bright solitons in a quasi-one-dimensional optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A89, 063605 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Di Carli, C

    A. Di Carli, C. D. Colquhoun, G. Henderson, S. Flan- nigan, G.-L. Oppo, A. J. Daley, S. Kuhr, and E. Haller, Excitation modes of bright matter-wave solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 123602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Bulgac, Dilute quantum droplets, Phys

    A. Bulgac, Dilute quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 050402 (2002)

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Kadau, M

    H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Observing the Rosensweig instability of a quantum ferrofluid, Nature530, 194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Science359, 301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Semeghini, G

    G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wol- swijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. In- guscio, and M. Fattori, Self-bound quantum droplets of atomic mixtures in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 235301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Cavicchioli, C

    L. Cavicchioli, C. Fort, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Mi- nardi, and A. Burchianti, Dynamical formation of multi- ple quantum droplets in a Bose-Bose mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 093401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    D’Errico, A

    C. D’Errico, A. Burchianti, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and C. Fort, Ob- servation of quantum droplets in a heteronuclear bosonic mixture, Physical Review Research1, 033155 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Z. Guo, F. Jia, L. Li, Y. Ma, J. M. Hutson, X. Cui, and D. Wang, Lee-huang-yang effects in the ultracold mixture of 23Na and 87Rb with attractive interspecies interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033247 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    G. E. Astrakharchik and B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of one-dimensional quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A98, 013631 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakharchik, Ultradilute low- dimensional liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 100401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Spada, S

    G. Spada, S. Pilati, and S. Giorgini, Quantum droplets in two-dimensional Bose mixtures at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    L. Dong, K. Shi, and C. Huang, Internal modes of two- dimensional quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A106, 053303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Cheiney, C

    P. Cheiney, C. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, and L. Tarruell, Bright soliton to quantum droplet transition in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical re- view letters120, 135301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    M. R. Pathak and A. Nath, Droplet to soliton crossover at negative temperature in presence of bi-periodic optical lattices, Scientific Reports12, 18248 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Cappellaro, T

    A. Cappellaro, T. Macr` ı, and L. Salasnich, Collective modes across the soliton-droplet crossover in binary Bose mixtures, Physical Review A97, 053623 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Baillie, R

    D. Baillie, R. M. Wilson, and P. B. Blakie, Collective excitations of self-bound droplets of a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 255302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Bisset, L

    R. Bisset, L. P. Ardila, and L. Santos, Quantum droplets of dipolar mixtures, Physical Review Letters126, 025301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Edmonds, T

    M. Edmonds, T. Bland, and N. Parker, Quantum droplets of quasi-one-dimensional dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Journal of Physics Communications4, 125008 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    B¨ ottcher, J.-N

    F. B¨ ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. X9, 011051 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Tanzi, S

    L. Tanzi, S. Roccuzzo, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, G. Modugno, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Supersolid symmetry breaking from compressional oscil- lations in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature574, 382 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature596, 357–361 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Gligori´ c, A

    G. Gligori´ c, A. Maluckov, L. c. v. Hadˇ zievski, and B. A. Malomed, Bright solitons in the one-dimensional discrete gross-pitaevskii equation with dipole-dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. A78, 063615 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    Lakomy, R

    K. Lakomy, R. Nath, and L. Santos, Soliton molecules in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A86, 013610 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Pedri and L

    P. Pedri and L. Santos, Two-dimensional bright solitons in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    Huang, L

    C. Huang, L. Lyu, H. Huang, Z. Chen, S. Fu, H. Tan, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Dipolar bright solitons and solitary vortices in a radial lattice, Phys. Rev. A96, 053617 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    R. D. M. J. Edmonds, T. Bland and N. G. Parker, En- gineering bright matter-wave solitons of dipolar conden- sates, New J. Phys.19, 023019 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Natale, T

    G. Natale, T. Bland, S. Gschwendtner, L. Lafforgue, D. S. Gr¨ un, A. Patscheider, M. J. Mark, and F. Fer- laino, Bloch oscillations and matter-wave localization of a dipolar quantum gas in a one-dimensional lattice, Com- munications Physics5, 227 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    D. S. Petrov, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Regimes of quantum degeneracy in trapped 1d gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3745 (2000)

    work page 2000

  56. [56]

    Menotti and S

    C. Menotti and S. Stringari, Collective oscillations of a one-dimensional trapped Bose-Einstein gas, Phys. Rev. A66, 043610 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Superfluidity(Oxford University Press, 2016). 12

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    E. Poli, T. Bland, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M. A. Norcia, F. Ferlaino, R. N. Bisset, and L. Santos, Maintaining supersolidity in one and two dimensions, Physical Review A104, 063307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    D. J. Korteweg and G. de Vries, On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves., Philosophical Maga- zine39, 422 (1895)

    work page

  60. [60]

    S. R. Otajonov, E. N. Tsoy, and F. K. Abdullaev, Station- ary and dynamical properties of one-dimensional quan- tum droplets, Physics Letters A383, 125980 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Lavoine and T

    L. Lavoine and T. Bourdel, Beyond-mean-field crossover from one dimension to three dimensions in quantum droplets of binary mixtures, Phys. Rev. A103, 033312 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Stenger, S

    J. Stenger, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, D. M. Stamper- Kurn, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Bragg spec- troscopy of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4569 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    Blakie, R

    P. Blakie, R. Ballagh, and C. Gardiner, Theory of coher- ent bragg spectroscopy of a trapped Bose-Einstein con- densate, Physical Review A65, 033602 (2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    J. J. A. Houwman, D. Baillie, P. B. Blakie, G. Natale, F. Ferlaino, and M. J. Mark, Measurement of the ex- citation spectrum of a dipolar gas in the macrodroplet regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 103401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    S. E. Pollack, D. Dries, R. G. Hulet, K. M. F. Mag- alh˜ aes, E. A. L. Henn, E. R. F. Ramos, M. A. Cara- canhas, and V. S. Bagnato, Collective excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate by modulation of the atomic scattering length, Phys. Rev. A81, 053627 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Haller, M

    E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, R. Hart, G. Pupillo, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Realization of an excited, strongly correlated quantum gas phase, Science 325, 1224 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature574, 386 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Ferrier-Barbut, M

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, M. Wenzel, F. B¨ ottcher, T. Langen, M. Isoard, S. Stringari, and T. Pfau, Scissors mode of dipolar quantum droplets of dysprosium atoms, Physical review letters120, 160402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Malkin and E

    V. Malkin and E. Shapiro, Elementary excitations for solitons of the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena53, 25 (1991)

    work page 1991

  70. [70]

    Bakkali-Hassani, C

    B. Bakkali-Hassani, C. Maury, S. Stringari, S. Nascim- bene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, The cross-over from townes solitons to droplets in a 2d Bose mixture, New Journal of Physics25, 013007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Tikhonenkov, B

    I. Tikhonenkov, B. A. Malomed, and A. Vardi, Anisotropic solitons in dipolar Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 090406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    Stringari, Collective excitations of a trapped Bose- condensed gas, Phys

    S. Stringari, Collective excitations of a trapped Bose- condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2360 (1996)

    work page 1996

  73. [73]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute Bose-Einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid, Physical Re- view X6, 041039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Bakkali-Hassani, C

    B. Bakkali-Hassani, C. Maury, Y.-Q. Zou, E. Le Cerf, R. Saint-Jalm, P. C. M. Castilho, S. Nascimbene, J. Dal- ibard, and J. Beugnon, Realization of a townes soliton in a two-component planar Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 023603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    B¨ ottcher, J.-N

    F. B¨ ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, New states of matter with fine-tuned interactions: quantum droplets and dipolar supersolids, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 012403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    H.-Y. Lu, H. Lu, J.-N. Zhang, R.-Z. Qiu, H. Pu, and S. Yi, Spatial density oscillations in trapped dipolar con- densates, Phys. Rev. A82, 023622 (2010)

    work page 2010

  77. [77]

    W. Bao, D. Jaksch, and P. A. Markowich, Numerical so- lution of the gross–pitaevskii equation for Bose–Einstein condensation, Journal of Computational Physics187, 318 (2003)

    work page 2003

  78. [78]

    Giovanazzi, P

    S. Giovanazzi, P. Pedri, L. Santos, A. Griesmaier, M. Fat- tori, T. Koch, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Expansion dy- namics of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate, Physical Review A74, 013621 (2006)

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    Glaum, A

    K. Glaum, A. Pelster, H. Kleinert, and T. Pfau, Critical temperature of weakly interacting dipolar condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 080407 (2007)

    work page 2007

  80. [80]

    P. B. Blakie, Axial collective mode of a dipolar quan- tum droplet, Photonics10, 10.3390/photonics10040393 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3390/photonics10040393 2023

Showing first 80 references.