Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperform pairwise strategies in mitigating contagion dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adaptive behaviors that track group-level risk contain epidemics more effectively and at lower social cost than pairwise information-based strategies.

desk verdict A clean and useful model comparison whose headline ranking rests on an unexamined normalization choice and an understated θ-dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.05915 v1 pith:K6FOFLCT submitted 2026-02-05 physics.soc-ph cs.SInlin.AO

Marco Mancastroppa , Márton Karsai , Alain Barrat This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-phcs.SInlin.AO
keywords contagiondynamicshypergraphsadaptivebehaviorriskperceptionhigher-orderinteractionsepidemicmitigationsocialcostmean-fieldapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which kind of local awareness best helps a population curb a spreading contagion: awareness based on one-on-one contacts or awareness based on the groups a person belongs to. Modeling both pairwise and group (higher-order) contagion on hypergraphs, it compares six adaptive strategies that reduce an individual's contagion risk in response to perceived danger. The central finding is that strategies using absolute counts of 'infectious groups'—groups containing a sufficiently large fraction of infected members—outperform strategies based on pairwise information, both in reducing final epidemic prevalence and in lowering the social cost, measured as the average reduction of interaction intensity. The mechanism is a heterogeneous alert pattern: the best strategies concentrate strong caution on high-hyperdegree nodes and large groups, the very nodes and groups that otherwise drive and sustain the spread. This hierarchy is robust across pairwise and higher-order contagion processes and across several empirical and synthetic hypergraphs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the awareness function f_i(t) that exponentially reduces a node's transmission parameter, λ_i(t) = λ_0 e^{-f_i(t)}, encoding self-protection and altruism. Six strategies define f_i from different information: absolute (number) versus relative (fraction) counts of risky interactions, and pairwise, hybrid (weighted), or higher-order (group) sources. The decisive mechanism is the self-reinforcing heterogeneity produced by absolute higher-order strategies: hubs and large groups perceive many infectious events, lower their λ more strongly, and consequently become less susceptible and less infectious, so the spread decouples from the structures that normally sustain it. An in

What would settle it

Run the same six-strategy comparison on a given hypergraph but normalize the absolute strategies by the median—or by each node's own baseline—of degree, strength, and hyperdegree. If ng and nw no longer dominate nn, fg, fw, and fn in both prevalence reduction and social cost, the paper's central conclusion fails for that calibration. A second test: check whether the hierarchy persists when the 'infectious group' threshold θ is set by a per-node adaptive rule rather than a fixed fraction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that, among six local awareness strategies that weaken transmission when risk is perceived, the two grounded in absolute higher-order information—counting how many of a node's groups are 'infectious' (ng) and the weighted count of contacts with infectious individuals (nw)—are the most effective at reducing epidemic prevalence and are also the least costly in terms of average behavioral change. Relative strategies (fractions of infectious neighbors, weights, or groups) and pairwise strategies yield larger reductions in overall activity but smaller reductions in prevalence. The authors attribute this advantage to heterogeneous risk perception: absolute h

Load-bearing premise

To compare absolute-count and fraction-based strategies on equal footing, the paper normalizes absolute counts by the population mean (mean degree, mean strength, mean hyperdegree); if a different reference were used, the reported hierarchy of efficacy and social cost could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, simple local heuristics that focus on group gatherings rather than one-on-one contact counts could provide both stronger epidemic mitigation and less overall social disruption.
  • Targeted-like protection can emerge endogenously, without any central coordination or global topological knowledge, simply by making people aware of how many of their groups are 'infected.'
  • The same strategy hierarchy applies to both pairwise and nonlinear higher-order contagion processes, and adaptive behaviors can tame the explosive, bistable transitions typical of higher-order contagion.
  • The paper's two-dimensional comparison—efficacy in reducing prevalence and social cost as activity reduction—provides a general framework for assessing future adaptive behavioral mechanisms.
  • The differences between strategies amplify with hyperdegree heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap, and vanish when the underlying hypergraph is homogeneous or pairwise, clarifying when higher-order awareness matters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's cost metric averages behavioral change over all individuals; the best strategies actually concentrate the burden on hubs. Whether that uneven distribution is socially acceptable is a policy question the model does not address.
  • The absolute-versus-relative comparison hinges on normalizing absolute counts by the population mean (degree, strength, hyperdegree); normalizing by the median or by each node's own baseline could shrink or alter the reported hierarchy, so the ranking should be read as conditional on that calibration.
  • A testable extension: in temporal hypergraphs or when groups merge and split, the advantage of ng/nw may persist or vanish depending on how group identity evolves; the paper does not test that regime.
  • The mechanism suggests a possible information-campaign design principle: telling people how many risky group exposures they have, rather than what fraction of their contacts are risky, may protect the population while preserving more normal social activity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies SIS contagion on empirical and synthetic hypergraphs, comparing six adaptive strategies in which node transmission parameters λ_i(t) = λ_0 exp(-f_i(t)) are reduced according to an awareness function f_i based on pairwise, hybrid, or higher-order (group) information, each in either absolute or relative form. The central claim is that strategies based on absolute higher-order information (ng and nw) are the most effective at reducing epidemic prevalence and also have the lowest social cost, because they concentrate risk perception on high-hyperdegree nodes and large groups, effectively acting as a targeted immunization mechanism. The paper supports this with 300-run agent-based simulations, an individual-based mean-field (IBMF) approach, and results across six empirical datasets and several synthetic hypergraphs.

Significance. If the central hierarchy is robust, the paper provides a useful design principle for adaptive behavioral interventions in settings with group interactions: using absolute higher-order information can yield both better epidemic control and lower social cost than relative or pairwise-only strategies. The systematic comparison across multiple strategies, the closed IBMF equations, and the analysis of microscopic mechanisms (first-infection times, hyperdegree-dependent awareness) are valuable contributions. The paper does not fit parameters to data, and the simulations and mean-field agree well, which strengthens the internal validity of the reported phenomenology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV B 4, Fig. 7] The abstract and introduction claim without qualification that 'adaptive behaviors driven by higher-order information are more effective ... than similar mechanisms based on pairwise information.' However, Fig. 7a and the accompanying text state that for θ > 2/3, the higher-order strategies ng and fg are less efficient than the other strategies. This is a direct overstatement of the results. The abstract and conclusions should be qualified to state the range of θ (and possibly the dataset-specific range) for which the hierarchy holds; otherwise the central claim is stronger than the evidence.
  2. [Eqs. (2), (4), (6) and Section II B] The absolute awareness functions are normalized by the population means ⟨k⟩, ⟨s⟩, and ⟨D⟩. This calibration sets the overall scale of the absolute strategies relative to the relative strategies, and the headline comparisons (e.g., ng vs fn, and the 'lower social cost' of ng/nw) depend on this choice. The manuscript states only that this is done 'to make mechanisms ... comparable,' but does not justify why the mean is the appropriate scale nor test sensitivity to alternative normalizations (e.g., median, maximum, or a constant factor). Since a rescaling of the absolute f_i changes every λ_i(t) exponentially, the efficacy/cost hierarchy could flip under another natural normalization. Please provide a robustness analysis or a principled argument for the chosen calibration; otherwise the main claim must be restricted to this specific modeling choice.
  3. [Section VI D, Eqs. (20)-(23)] The IBMF derivation for the hybrid strategies (fw and nw) uses the approximation W_i(n,t) ≈ n ⟨w⟩_I(t), which replaces the exact sum over infected-neighbor configurations by the mean weight of infected neighbors. This is an uncontrolled approximation in what is otherwise presented as a closed analytic derivation. While the simulation–mean-field agreement is good for the parameter values shown, the validity of this approximation for other parameter regimes and for the strategy hierarchy should be discussed. Please at least explicitly state that this is an approximation and, ideally, assess its error against the exact combinatorial expression for small-degree nodes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Section IV A] The sentence 'a clear hierarchy is observed ... which does not depend on the epidemic parameter r' is based on a finite range of r and on specific datasets; the SM shows analogous results but not a systematic scan over r for all datasets. Please soften to 'in the parameter range explored.'
  2. [Section II B, Eqs. (2)-(7)] In the definition of the ng/fg strategies, the threshold θ uses the condition i_e > θ(|e|-1). This is clear, but the notation 1_θ(e,i) is introduced before its definition in the same paragraph. Move the definition of the indicator function to just before Eq. (6).
  3. [Section VI C] The term 'asymptotic state' is used both for the absorbing state and for the endemic steady state. In the Methods, 'asymptotic state' for the integration of mean-field equations refers to Pi(t→∞) while for simulations T is finite. Consider using 'quasi-stationary state' for the finite-time simulation average to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Supplementary Material, Fig. 15-19] The figure captions for synthetic hypergraphs say 'Analogous to Supplementary Fig. 2/3/4...' but do not restate the definition of the r values for each panel. While acceptable for an SM, it would help readability to list the r values in each caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is self-contained and the central hierarchy emerges from simulations of a fixed model, not from a fitted or self-cited input.

full rationale

The model is fully specified by Eqs. (1)-(7): each awareness function is a closed-form function of the infectious neighborhood, with no parameters fitted to the outcomes being predicted. The contagion processes are defined in Sec. II A, and the IBMF equations (8)-(9) are closed via the explicit expressions in Eqs. (12)-(27) for Q, the averaged transmission parameter, and each awareness function; the only approximation (Eq. 20) is a stated computational simplification validated against stochastic simulations. The epidemic-threshold invariance for all six strategies is derived in Eqs. (30)-(35), so the paper does not import that result from the companion paper. The companion paper [44] is cited for context and for the higher-order transition phenomenology, but the efficacy/cost hierarchy at fixed r is produced by independent numerical simulations and MF integrations on six empirical and multiple synthetic hypergraphs. The normalization of absolute strategies by population means (<k>, <s>, <D>) is an explicit modeling choice described in Sec. II B, not a hidden fit; changing it would define different adaptive mechanisms. This is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity. No equation reduces to its inputs by construction, and no output is a renamed fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities; its ingredients are hand-set model parameters (λ0/μ, ν, θ), standard SIS dynamics, and an exponential awareness response. The IBMF rests on the usual independence approximation plus one ad-hoc computational approximation for hybrid strategies. The comparison of absolute vs relative strategies depends on the choice of mean-based normalizations (⟨k⟩, ⟨s⟩, ⟨D⟩), which is a modeling choice rather than a fitted parameter.

free parameters (4)
  • r = λ0²/μ (effective infection rate) = 0.05–0.2 (pairwise); 0.01–0.2 (higher-order), e.g., r=0.05 with μ=10⁻²
    Hand-chosen to study the endemic phase; the paper claims the hierarchy is independent of r (Fig. 2).
  • μ (recovery probability) = 10⁻² (pairwise), 10⁻¹ (higher-order)
    Simulation parameter; r absorbs its value for phase-diagram comparisons.
  • ν (nonlinearity exponent in higher-order contagion) = 4
    Fixed, following standard simplicial-contagion models [37]; not fitted.
  • θ (alert threshold for infectious groups) = 0.3 in main text; swept over [0,1] in Fig. 7
    Defines when a group is perceived at risk; the comparative result is θ-dependent, reversing for θ > 2/3.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Statistical independence of neighboring node states in the individual-based mean-field (IBMF), i.e., Q_e\i(i_e,t) factorizes over nodes (Eq. 12).
    Standard IBMF assumption; validated a posteriori by simulation agreement, but can fail in strongly correlated small systems.
  • domain assumption Awareness acts through λ_i(t)=λ0 e^{−f_i(t)} and infection probability factorizes as λ_iλ_j (pairwise) or λ0 i_e^ν λ_i ⟨λ_j/λ0⟩^ν (higher-order).
    Model choice standard in local-awareness literature [11,13,19]; not derived from behavioral data.
  • ad hoc to paper For hybrid strategies, the approximation W_i(n,t) ≈ n ⟨w_{i,j}⟩_I(t) (Eqs. 20–23).
    Introduced for computational feasibility; its error is not bounded, only indirectly checked by simulation agreement.
  • standard math Epidemic-threshold analysis linearizes the IBMF around the absorbing state and keeps only first-order terms (Sec. VI E).
    Standard linear-stability analysis of SIS mean-field; valid in the limit P→0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperform pairwise strategies in mitigating contagion dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K6FOFLCT

@misc{pith2026260205915,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperform pairwise strategies in mitigating contagion dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K6FOFLCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.05915}
}
read the original abstract

When exposed to a contagion phenomenon, individuals may respond to the perceived risk of infection by adopting behavioral changes, aiming to reduce their exposure or their risk of infecting others. The social cost of such adaptive behaviors and their impact on the contagion dynamics have been investigated in pairwise networks, with binary interactions driving both contagion and risk perception. However, contagion and adaptive mechanisms can also be driven by group (higher-order) interactions. Here, we consider several adaptive behaviors triggered by awareness of risk perceived through higher-order and pairwise interactions, and we compare their impact on pairwise and higher-order contagion processes. By numerical simulations and a mean-field analytic approach, we show that adaptive behaviors driven by higher-order information are more effective in limiting the spread of a contagion, than similar mechanisms based on pairwise information. Meanwhile, they also entail a lower social cost, measured as the reduction of the intensity of interactions in the population. Indeed, adaptive mechanisms based on higher-order information lead to a heterogeneous risk perception within the population, producing a higher alert on nodes with large hyperdegree (i.e., participating in many groups), on their neighborhoods, and on large groups. This in turn prevents the spreading process to exploit the properties of these nodes and groups, which tend to drive and sustain the dynamics in the absence of adaptive behaviors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05915 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a shows the distributions ρ(λ∞ i /λ0) of the transmission parameters of the various nodes in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a,b show the epidemic prevalence I∞ and the average transmission parameter ⟨λ∞ i ⟩/λ0 in the asymp￾totic state as a function of θ (for both the IBMF approach and the numerical simulations). For θ = 1 the strate￾gies both coincide with the NAD case, since no group is co…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Vespignani, A

    Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M. & Vespignani, A. Dynami- cal processes on complex networks (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    & Vespignani, A

    Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–979 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    & Ghosh, D

    Majhi, S., Perc, M. & Ghosh, D. Dynamics on higher- order networks: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220043 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Impact of the level of alert All the previous results have been obtained for a given value of the parameter θ, which defines the level of alert for the strategies based on group information, namely, the minimum fraction of infectious nodes that a node i needs to detect in a group to which it belongs to deem it infectious. Lower values of θ means that it is...

  5. [5]

    & Jansen, V

    Funk, S., Salath´ e, M. & Jansen, V. A. A. Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1247–1256 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Wang, W. et al. Epidemic spreading on higher-order net- works. Phys. Rep. 1056, 1–70 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    & Beutels, P

    Verelst, F., Willem, L. & Beutels, P. Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015). J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160820 (2016)

    2010

  8. [8]

    & Vespignani, A

    Perra, N., Balcan, D., Gon¸ calves, B. & Vespignani, A. Towards a characterization of behavior-disease models. PLOS ONE 6, e23084 (2011)

    2011

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    & Paolotti, D

    De Gaetano, A., Barrat, A. & Paolotti, D. Modeling the interplay between disease spread, behaviors, and disease perception with a data-driven approach. Mathematical Biosciences 378, 109337 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    De Bruin, W. B. & Bennett, D. Relationships between initial covid-19 risk perceptions and protective health be- haviors: a national survey. American Journal of Preven- tive Medicine 59, 157–167 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    & Sguanci, L

    Bagnoli, F., Li` o, P. & Sguanci, L. Risk perception in epidemic modeling. Phys. Rev. E 76, 061904 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Gross, T., D’Lima, C. J. D. & Blasius, B. Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    & Barrat, A

    Moinet, A., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Barrat, A. Effect of risk perception on epidemic spreading in temporal net- works. Phys. Rev. E 97, 012313 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    & Dub´ e, L

    Marceau, V., No¨ el, P.-A., H´ ebert-Dufresne, L., Allard, A. & Dub´ e, L. J. Adaptive networks: Coevolution of disease and topology. Phys. Rev. E 82, 036116 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    & Blasius, B

    Gross, T. & Blasius, B. Adaptive coevolutionary net- works: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 259–271 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    & Yanchuk, S

    Berner, R., Gross, T., Kuehn, C., Kurths, J. & Yanchuk, S. Adaptive dynamical networks. Phys. Rep. 1031, 1–59 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    & Jansen, V

    Funk, S., Gilad, E., Watkins, C. & Jansen, V. A. A. The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6872–6877 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Fenichel, E. P. et al. Adaptive human behavior in epi- demiological models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6306–6311 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    & Karsai, M

    ´Odor, G. & Karsai, M. Epidemic-induced local aware- ness behavior inferred from surveys and genetic sequence data. Nature Communications 16, 4758 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Capturing human behaviour

    Ferguson, N. Capturing human behaviour. Nature 446, 733–733 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    & Vezzani, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Burioni, R., Colizza, V. & Vezzani, A. Active and inactive quarantine in epidemic spreading on adaptive activity-driven networks. Phys. Rev. E 102, 020301 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    De Gaetano, A. et al. Behavioral changes associated with covid-19 vaccination: Cross-national online survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e47563 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    & Sayama, H

    Gross, T. & Sayama, H. Adaptive networks. In Adap- tive networks: Theory, models and applications , 1–8 (Springer, 2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    & Tang, S

    Liu, L., Zheng, H., Han, Z., Wang, X. & Tang, S. Higher-order network adaptivity: co-evolution of higher- order structure and spreading dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15445 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    & Burioni, R

    Mancastroppa, M., Vezzani, A., Colizza, V. & Burioni, R. Preserving system activity while controlling epidemic spreading in adaptive temporal networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033159 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Sayama, H. et al. Modeling complex systems with adap- tive networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applica- tions 65, 1645–1664 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    D., Klinkenberg, D., Heesterbeek, H

    Hollingsworth, T. D., Klinkenberg, D., Heesterbeek, H. & Anderson, R. M. Mitigation strategies for pandemic in- fluenza a: Balancing conflicting policy objectives. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001076 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    The absorbing state is thus stable if and only if the largest eigenvalue of {Ji,j} is negative, i.e

    around the absorbing state P = [0, 0, ..., 0] leads to the Jacobian matrix with element Ji,j = −µδi,j + λ2 0wi,j. The absorbing state is thus stable if and only if the largest eigenvalue of {Ji,j} is negative, i.e. if: r = λ2 0/µ < 1/Λw ≡ rN AD,p C , (29) where Λ w is the larg...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Kolok, C. m. H. B., ´Odor, G., Keliger, D. & Karsai, M. Epidemic paradox induced by awareness driven network dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012061 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    & Vespig- nani, A

    Massaro, E., Ganin, A., Perra, N., Linkov, I. & Vespig- nani, A. Resilience management during large-scale epi- demic outbreaks. Sci. Rep. 8, 1859 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Fenichel, E. P. Economic considerations for social dis- tancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic. J. Health Econ. 32, 440–451 (2013). 16

    2013

  24. [32]

    Fraser, C., Riley, S., Anderson, R. M. & Ferguson, N. M. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak control- lable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6146–6151 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Colosi, E. et al. Screening and vaccination against covid- 19 to minimise school closure: a modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 22, 977–989 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    & Van Mieghem, P

    Guo, D., Trajanovski, S., van de Bovenkamp, R., Wang, H. & Van Mieghem, P. Epidemic threshold and topo- logical structure of susceptible-infectious-susceptible ep i- demics in adaptive networks. Phys. Rev. E 88, 042802 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    & Latora, V

    Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Barrat, A. & Latora, V. Simplicial models of social contagion. Nature Communications 10, 2485 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Ferraz de Arruda, G., Petri, G., Rodriguez, P. M. & Moreno, Y. Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs. Nature Communications 14, 1375 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    & Moreno, Y

    Ferraz de Arruda, G., Tizzani, M. & Moreno, Y. Phase transitions and stability of dynamical processes on hy- pergraphs. Communications Physics 4, 24 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    & G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, J

    Malizia, F., Lamata-Ot ´ ın, S., Frasca, M., Latora, V. & G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, J. Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions. Na- ture Communications 16, 555 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    St-Onge, G. et al. Influential groups for seeding and sustaining nonlinear contagion in heterogeneous hyper- graphs. Communications Physics 5, 25 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Iacopini, I., Petri, G. & Barrat, A. Hyper-cores promote localization and efficient seeding in higher-order processes. Nature Communications 14, 6223 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Battiston, F. et al. The physics of higher-order interac- tions in complex systems. Nature Physics 17, 1093–1098 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Battiston, F. et al. Networks beyond pairwise interac- tions: Structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 874, 1–92 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    & Burioni, R

    Mancastroppa, M., Guizzo, A., Castellano, C., Vezzani, A. & Burioni, R. Sideward contact tracing and the con- trol of epidemics in large gatherings. J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220048 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    & H´ ebert-Dufresne, L

    Burgio, G., St-Onge, G. & H´ ebert-Dufresne, L. Charac- teristic scales and adaptation in higher-order contagions. Nature Communications 16, 4589 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    & Barrat, A

    Iacopini, I., Karsai, M. & Barrat, A. The temporal dy- namics of group interactions in higher-order social net- works. Nature Communications 15, 7391 (2024)

    2024

  38. [47]

    Landry, N. W. & Restrepo, J. G. The effect of hetero- geneity on hypergraph contagion models. Chaos: An In- terdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 30, 103117 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    & Kiss, I

    Malizia, F., Guzm´ an, A., Iacopini, I. & Kiss, I. Z. Disen - tangling the role of heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap in explosive contagion on higher-order networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 207401 (2025)

    2025

  40. [49]

    & Vespignani, A

    Barrat, A., Barth´ elemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3747–3752 (2004)

    2004

  41. [50]

    URL http://www

    Sociopatterns collaboration (2008). URL http://www. sociopatterns.org/

    2008

  42. [51]

    Vanhems, P. et al. Estimating potential infection trans- mission routes in hospital wards using wearable proximity sensors. PLOS ONE 8, e73970 (2013)

    2013

  43. [52]

    & Barrat, A

    G´ enois, M. & Barrat, A. Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts? EPJ Data Science 7, 11 (2018)

    2018

  44. [53]

    Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A case of four science conferences

    G´ enois, M.et al. Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A case of four science conferences. Personality Science 4, e9957 (2023)

    2023

  45. [54]

    High-resolution measurements of face-to- face contact patterns in a primary school

    Stehl´ e, J.et al. High-resolution measurements of face-to- face contact patterns in a primary school. PLOS ONE 6, e23176 (2011)

    2011

  46. [55]

    & Barrat, A

    Mastrandrea, R., Fournet, J. & Barrat, A. Contact pat- terns in a high school: A comparison between data col- lected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friend- ship surveys. PLOS ONE 10, e0136497 (2015)

    2015

  47. [56]

    & ben Avraham, D

    Cohen, R., Havlin, S. & ben Avraham, D. Efficient im- munization strategies for computer networks and popu- lations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 247901 (2003)

    2003

  48. [57]

    A., Cencetti, G

    Contreras, D. A., Cencetti, G. & Barrat, A. Infection patterns in simple and complex contagion processes on networks. PLOS Comput. Biol. 20, e1012206 (2024)

    2024

  49. [58]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Iacopini, I., Petri, G. & Barrat, A. The structural evolution of temporal hypergraphs through the lens of hyper-cores. EPJ Data Science 13, 50 (2024)

    2024

  50. [59]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Cencetti, G. & Barrat, A. Emerging activity temporal hypergraph: A model for generating realistic time-varying hypergraphs. Phys. Rev. E 112, 054305 (2025)

    2025

  51. [61]

    & Strohmaier, M

    G´ enois, M., Schaible, J., Zens, M., Oliveira, M. & Strohmaier, M. Sociopatterns conferences dataset - con- tact data. GESIS, Cologne (2022). URL https://doi. org/10.7802/2351. Supplementary Material for ”Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperfor m pairwise strategies in miti...

    2022 doi

  52. [62]

    Vanhems, P. et al. Estimating potential infection transmission routes in hospit al wards using wearable proximity sensors. PLOS ONE 8, e73970 (2013)

    2013

  53. [63]

    URL http://www.sociopatterns.org/

    Sociopatterns collaboration (2008). URL http://www.sociopatterns.org/

    2008

  54. [64]

    High-resolution measurements of face-to-face contact patterns i n a primary school

    Stehl´ e, J.et al. High-resolution measurements of face-to-face contact patterns i n a primary school. PLOS ONE 6, e23176 (2011)

    2011

  55. [65]

    & Barrat, A

    Mastrandrea, R., Fournet, J. & Barrat, A. Contact patterns in a h igh school: A comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveys. PLOS ONE 10, e0136497 (2015)

    2015

  56. [66]

    G´ enois, M. et al. Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A c ase of four science conferences. Personality Science 4, e9957 (2023)

    2023

  57. [67]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Iacopini, I., Petri, G. & Barrat, A. Hyper-c ores promote localization and efficient seeding in higher-order processes. Nature Communications 14, 6223 (2023)

    2023

  58. [68]

    & Barrat, A

    Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Baronchelli, A. & Barrat, A. Group int eractions modulate critical mass dynamics in social convention. Communications Physics 5, 64 (2022)

    2022

  59. [69]

    & Barrat, A

    Agostinelli, C., Mancastroppa, M. & Barrat, A. Higher-order d issimilarity measures for hypergraph comparison. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16959 (2025)

    2025

  60. [70]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Karsai, M. & Barrat, A. Adaptive behaviors n eutralize bistable explosive transitions in higher- order contagion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05801 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.