pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.07137 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Assessment of DKIST/VTF Capabilities for the Detection of Local Acoustic Source Wavefronts

Corinne Morrell , Mark P. Rast , Shah Mohammad Bahauddin , Ivan Mili\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords solar acoustic wavesDKIST VTFphotospheric wavefrontsp-mode excitationiron spectral lineshelioseismologywave detection strategysolar photosphere
0
0 comments X

The pith

DKIST/VTF can detect local acoustic wavefronts via targeted wavelengths in iron lines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates whether the Visible Tunable Filter on the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope can capture local acoustic source wavefronts in the solar photosphere. Simulations have already shown that temporal filtering isolates these small-amplitude wavefronts, but real observations face tight limits on cadence, spatial resolution, and spectral sampling. The authors therefore test wavelength positions inside strong iron lines to find combinations that produce the largest response to the wave signal while staying within instrument constraints. Two concrete strategies emerge for the simulated case: rapid single-wavelength imaging or ordered interleaved sampling in the blue wing of a chosen line. Success would give direct views of how p-modes are stochastically excited and where their sources lie beneath the surface.

Core claim

Under the cadence and spectral resolution constraints of DKIST/VTF observations and for the particular simulated wavefront examined, fast monochromatic imaging at 6302.425 Å or ordered interleaved observations in the blue wing of either the Fe I 6302.5 Å line (between 6302.419 Å and 6302.465 Å) or the Fe I 5250.6 Å line (between 5250.579 Å and 5250.607 Å) maximize sensitivity to the acoustic wave signal.

What carries the argument

Wavelength selection inside spectral lines chosen to maximize the amplitude response to small photospheric velocity and intensity perturbations while respecting instrument cadence limits.

If this is right

  • Direct measurement of the depth distribution of acoustic sources below the photosphere becomes feasible.
  • The dominant physical mechanisms that stochastically excite solar p-modes can be identified from observed wavefront properties.
  • Improved mapping of the complex wavefield in the lower chromosphere is possible.
  • Ultra-local helioseismic diagnostics that resolve individual source regions can be developed.
  • Routine observational tracking of acoustic excitation events on the Sun can be established.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wavelength-selection logic could be adapted to other high-resolution solar instruments that offer tunable filters or rapid spectral scanning.
  • If the method succeeds, it supplies an independent test of the radiative magnetohydrodynamic simulations used to train the detection filter.
  • Detection of these wavefronts would allow statistical studies of how source strength varies with magnetic field strength and convection pattern.
  • The approach might eventually support real-time monitoring of acoustic power input into the solar atmosphere.

Load-bearing premise

The single simulated wavefront studied is typical of real solar conditions and that any sensitivity gains found in the simulation will appear unchanged once the same wavelengths are used on actual telescope data.

What would settle it

DKIST/VTF data taken with either the 6302.425 Å monochromatic mode or the recommended interleaved blue-wing sequences, then processed with the same temporal filter; if no clear wavefront signature matching the simulation appears at the expected location and time, the proposed strategies do not work as described.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07137 by Corinne Morrell, Ivan Mili\'c, Mark P. Rast, Shah Mohammad Bahauddin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Propagation of a localized acoustic wavefront through the photosphere in a radiative MHD simulation. Panels show snapshots of the (A) line-of-sight velocity (top), its (B) third-order temporal difference (middle), and the corresponding (C) third-order temporal difference of temperature (bottom), revealing a coherent wavefront expanding across a granulation cell. Temporal differencing suppresses background … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Height-dependent velocity and temperature structure of the simulated atmosphere at a single time step. The panel shows an instantaneous vertical slice of (A) line-of-sight velocity v (left), (B) temporal velocity difference v (3) (middle), and (C) temperature fluctuations T ′ = T − T0, where T0 is the horizontal mean temperature at each height (right), over the full vertical extent (3 Mm) of the MURaM solu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Construction of azimuthally averaged acoustic mask from the MURaM simulation. (A) Temporal velocity difference v (3) snapshot (left) showing the acoustic wavefront in the MURaM photosphere with concentric annuli around fitted center (cyan). Annulus selected for analysis indicated with dark, bolded boundaries. (B) Standard score Z(z, t) map for the region of interest (right), revealing a clear, height-depen… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: One-dimensional upward wave propagation constructed from azimuthally averaged perturbations in the annulus of interest. The temporally differenced velocity v (3) (solid black line) and differenced temperature perturbation δT(3) (dashed black line) are shown as functions of time and vertically offset by height, revealing the coherent upward progression of the acoustic wavefront through the atmosphere. The s… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ratios of the amplitudes of the maximum intensity perturbations due to velocity and temperature fluctuations, i.e., R(λ) = maxt [∆Iv(λ, t)]/maxt [∆IT (λ, t)], for the specific acoustic event considered here. 3.3 Sensitivity Measure For small amplitude perturbations, the change in emergent intensity at each height in the simulation at a given wavelength λ is approximately ∆I(λ, t) = Z [RFT (λ, z) δT(z, t) +… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time-dependent drift of the wavelength of maximum temperature sensitivity, λ ∗ , averaged over the annulus of interest. The evolution of λ ∗ toward the rest-frame line center (λ0) traces the upward propagation of the acoustic wavefront and the corresponding shift in the atmospheric layer contributing most strongly to the intensity response. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of λ ∗ over pixels. and… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The average, over the annulus of interest, of the temperature response function RFT (normalized by continuum intensity Ic) for each atmosphere making up the annulus of interest at t = 1640 s, across the Fe I 5250.2, 5250.6, and 6302.5 spectral lines (background) The probability density function of λ ∗∗ for each pixel in the annulus of interest is over-plotted in red, with λ ∗∗ indicated with a black vertic… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that temporal filtering can successfully identify local-acoustic-source wavefronts in radiative magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the solar photosphere. Extending this capability to observations promises new insight into the stochastic excitation of solar p-modes, the source depth distribution below the photosphere, and the dominant physical processes underlying acoustic wave excitation. Such measurements would also enable improved characterization of the complex wavefield in the lower chromosphere and open the possibility of ultra-local helioseismic diagnostics. In this work, we assess an observational strategy for the detection of local acoustic wavefronts on the Sun using the Visible Tunable Filter (VTF) instrument on the National Science Foundation's Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST). Because wavefront identification requires high spatial and temporal resolution and is limited by the small amplitudes of the wave perturbations, we focus on identifying specific wavelength combinations within spectral lines that maximize the sensitivity to the wave signal. Under the cadence and spectral resolution constraints of DKIST/VTF observations and for the particular simulated wavefront we examine, this approach suggests two possible strategies: fast monochromatic imaging at 6302.425 A, or ordered interleaved observations in the blue wing of either the Fe I 6302.5 A or Fe I 5250.6 A line (between 6302.419 A and 6302.465 A, or between 5250.579 A and 5250.607 A respectively).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript assesses DKIST/VTF capabilities for detecting local acoustic source wavefronts via radiative MHD simulations of the solar photosphere. Focusing on wavelength selection to maximize wave-signal sensitivity under the instrument's cadence and spectral-resolution limits, it concludes that two strategies are viable for the particular simulated wavefront examined: fast monochromatic imaging at 6302.425 Å or ordered interleaved observations in the blue wing of the Fe I 6302.5 Å line (6302.419–6302.465 Å) or the Fe I 5250.6 Å line (5250.579–5250.607 Å).

Significance. If the simulation-based sensitivity ranking holds under real solar conditions and DKIST noise characteristics, the work supplies a concrete observational roadmap that could enable direct detection of local acoustic sources, thereby constraining p-mode excitation depths and mechanisms as well as improving characterization of the lower-chromospheric wave field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The sensitivity metric that ranks the candidate wavelengths is central to the two recommended strategies, yet its precise definition (including weighting of amplitude, phase, and noise contributions) is not stated explicitly enough to allow independent verification of why 6302.425 Å or the cited blue-wing intervals outperform other positions within the same lines.
  2. [Results] The analysis is scoped to a single simulated wavefront; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the ranking of the two strategies is to changes in wavefront amplitude, spatial scale, or magnetic-field strength, because this directly affects the load-bearing claim that the strategies are observationally viable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Replace the abbreviation “A” with the proper angstrom symbol “Å” throughout the text and figure labels.
  2. [Discussion] The exact wavelength sampling points used for the interleaved observations should be listed in a table or enumerated in the text so that observers can replicate the proposed cadence without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's thoughtful review and recommendations for improving the manuscript. We address each of the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] The sensitivity metric that ranks the candidate wavelengths is central to the two recommended strategies, yet its precise definition (including weighting of amplitude, phase, and noise contributions) is not stated explicitly enough to allow independent verification of why 6302.425 Å or the cited blue-wing intervals outperform other positions within the same lines.

    Authors: We agree that the sensitivity metric requires a more explicit definition for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that states the full formula, including the precise weighting of amplitude, phase coherence, and noise terms, together with the justification for those weights based on the wavefront detection procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The analysis is scoped to a single simulated wavefront; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the ranking of the two strategies is to changes in wavefront amplitude, spatial scale, or magnetic-field strength, because this directly affects the load-bearing claim that the strategies are observationally viable.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the study examines only one simulated wavefront. We have added a new paragraph in the Results section that tests the stability of the wavelength ranking under moderate changes in amplitude and spatial scale using the existing simulation data. A full exploration of magnetic-field strength variations would require additional radiative MHD runs that are computationally prohibitive within the present scope; we have therefore added an explicit statement of this limitation and its implications for the viability claim. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; assessment is simulation-driven and externally constrained

full rationale

The paper evaluates DKIST/VTF observational strategies for local acoustic wavefront detection by applying temporal filtering to one specific radiative MHD simulation and testing wavelength sensitivity under stated instrument cadence and resolution limits. No derivation chain reduces to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. The two suggested strategies (monochromatic imaging at 6302.425 Å or interleaved blue-wing observations) are presented as direct outcomes of the external simulation sensitivity analysis for the examined wavefront, with explicit scoping that avoids general claims. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the examined simulated wavefront represents typical solar acoustic sources and that instrument constraints are accurately modeled.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The simulated wavefront is representative of actual solar photospheric conditions
    Invoked to justify the wavelength selection for real observations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6248 in / 1087 out tokens · 83959 ms · 2026-05-16T06:05:53.007030+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aerts, C., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., and Kurtz, D. W. (2010).Asteroseismology(Springer, Dordrecht) Ambastha, A., Basu, S., and Antia, H. M. (2003). Flare-Induced Excitation of Solar p modes.Sol. Phys 218, 151–172. doi:10.1023/B:SOLA.0000013043.45512.20 Bahauddin, S. M., Fischer, C. E., Rast, M. P., Milic, I., Woeger, F., Rempel, M., et al. (2024). Observ...

    work page doi:10.1023/b:sola.0000013043.45512.20 2010

  2. [2]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ abfdae Bahauddin, S. M. and Rast, M. P. (2023). Identifying Acoustic Wave Sources on the Sun. II. Improved Filter Techniques for Source Wavefield Seismology.Astrophys. J.955,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2023

  3. [3]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced46 Balmforth, N. J. (1992). Solar pulsational stability - III. Acoustical excitation by turbulent convection. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.255,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced46 1992

  4. [4]

    A., Solanki, S

    doi:10.1093/mnras/255.4.639 Bello Gonz´alez, N., Franz, M., Mart ´ınez Pillet, V ., Bonet, J. A., Solanki, S. K., del Toro Iniesta, J. C., et al. (2010). Detection of Large Acoustic Energy Flux in the Solar Atmosphere.Astrophys. J. Lett.723, L134–L138. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L134 Morrell et al.Local source wavefront detection Chaturmutha, V ., Fleck,...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/255.4.639 2010

  5. [5]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad36c5 Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. (2002). Helioseismology.Reviews of Modern Physics74, 1073–1129. doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.74.1073 Cox, A. N. (2002). Unsolved Problems in Stellar Pulsation Physics (invited review). InIAU Colloq. 185: Radial and Nonradial Pulsationsn as Probes of Stellar Physics, eds. C. Aerts, T. R. Bedding, and J. Chr...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad36c5 2002

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02562-5 Del Toro Iniesta, J. C. and Ruiz Cobo, B. (1996). Stokes Profiles Inversion Techniques.Sol. Phys164, 169–182. doi:10.1007/BF00146631 del Toro Iniesta, J. C. and Ruiz Cobo, B. (2016). Inversion of the radiative transfer equation for polarized light.Living Reviews in Solar Physics13,

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02562-5 1996

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0005-2 Donea, A. C. and Lindsey, C. (2005). Seismic Emission from the Solar Flares of 2003 October 28 and

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0005-2 2005

  8. [8]

    J.630, 1168–1183

    Astrophys. J.630, 1168–1183. doi:10.1086/432155 Gizon, L. and Birch, A. C. (2005). Local Helioseismology.Living Reviews in Solar Physics2,

    work page doi:10.1086/432155 2005

  9. [9]

    and Keeley, D

    doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-6 Goldreich, P. and Keeley, D. A. (1977). Solar seismology. II. The stochastic excitation of the solar p-modes by turbulent convection.Astrophys. J.212, 243–251. doi:10.1086/155043 Goldreich, P. and Kumar, P. (1990). Wave Generation by Turbulent Convection.Astrophys. J.363,

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-6 2005

  10. [10]

    doi:10.1086/169376 Goldreich, P., Murray, N., and Kumar, P. (1994). Excitation of Solar p-Modes.Astrophys. J.424,

    work page doi:10.1086/169376 1994

  11. [11]

    R., Strous, L

    doi:10.1086/173904 Goode, P. R., Strous, L. H., Rimmele, T. R., and Stebbins, R. T. (1998). On the Origin of Solar Oscillations. Astrophys. J. Lett.495, L27–L30. doi:10.1086/311203 Guevara G´omez, J. C., Jafarzadeh, S., Wedemeyer, S., and Szydlarski, M. (2022). Propagation of transverse waves in the solar chromosphere probed at different heights with ALMA...

    work page doi:10.1086/173904 1998

  12. [12]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafac1 Kosovichev, A. G. and Zharkova, V . V . (1998). X-ray flare sparks quake inside Sun.Nature393, 317–318. doi:10.1038/30629 Lighthill, M. J. (1952). On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. I. General Theory.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A211, 564–587. doi:10.1098/rspa.1952.0060 Morrell et al.Local source wavefron...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafac1 1998

  13. [13]

    Exploding

    doi:10.1007/s11207-020-1580-x Marmolino, C. and Severino, G. (1990). On the 5-MINUTE Photospheric Oscillation and its Modeling. InSolar Photosphere: Structure, Convection, and Magnetic Fields, ed. J. O. Stenflo. vol. 138 ofIAU Symposium, 251 Mart´ınez, A. D., Ortega, V . Q., Buitrago-Casas, J. C., Mart´ınez Oliveros, J. C., Calvo-Mozo, B., and Lindsey, C....

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-020-1580-x 1990

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1086/175576 Rast, M. P. (1997). Photospheric Downflows: How deep, how coherent, how important? InSCORe’96 : Solar Convection and Oscillations and their Relationship, eds. F. P. Pijpers, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, and C. S. Rosenthal. vol. 225, 135–138. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5167-2 13 Rast, M. P. (1999). The Thermal Starting Plume as an Acoustic Sou...

    work page doi:10.1086/175576 1997

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132 Rempel, M. (2018). Small-scale Dynamo Simulations: Magnetic Field Amplification in Exploding Granules and the Role of Deep and Shallow Recirculation.Astrophys. J.859,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/132 2018

  16. [16]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabba0 [Dataset] Rempel, M. (2025). Private communication Rimmele, T. R., Goode, P. R., Harold, E., and Stebbins, R. T. (1995). Dark Lanes in Granulation and the Excitation of Solar Oscillations.Astrophys. J. Lett.444, L119. doi:10.1086/187874 Rimmele, T. R., Warner, M., Keil, S. L., Goode, P. R., Kn¨olker, M., Kuhn, J. R., et al. (2...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabba0 2025

  17. [17]

    R., Warner, M., Keil, S

    doi:10.1007/s11207-020-01736-7 Roth, M., Franz, M., Bello Gonz ´alez, N., Mart´ınez Pillet, V ., Bonet, J. A., Gandorfer, A., et al. (2010). Surface Waves in Solar Granulation Observed with SUNRISE.Astrophys. J. Lett.723, L175–L179. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L175 Roxburgh, I. W. and V orontsov, S. V . (1997). On the formation of spectral line profiles o...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-020-01736-7 2010

  18. [18]

    and Bonaccini, D

    doi:10.1007/3-540-54420-8 67 Straus, T. and Bonaccini, D. (1997). Dynamics of the solar photosphere. I. Two-dimensional spectroscopy of mesoscale phenomena.Astron. Astrophys.324, 704–712 Morrell et al.Local source wavefront detection Straus, T., Severino, G., Deubner, F. L., Fleck, B., Jefferies, S. M., and Tarbell, T. (1999). Observational Constraints on...

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-54420-8 1997

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1002/asna.201612434 Van Noort, M., Rouppe Van Der V oort, L., and L¨ofdahl, M. G. (2005). Solar Image Restoration By Use Of Multi-frame Blind De-convolution With Multiple Objects And Phase Diversity.Sol. Phys228, 191–215. doi:10.1007/s11207-005-5782-z Vesa, O., Jackiewicz, J., and Reardon, K. (2023). Multiheight Observations of Atmospheric Gravity ...

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201612434 2005

  20. [20]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd930

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd930