Integral Harnack estimates and the rate of extinction of singular fractional diffusion

Antonio Iannizzotto; Filippo M. Cassanello; Simone Ciani

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 42 references

Integral Harnack estimates and the rate of extinction of singular fractional diffusion

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that local weak solutions of singular fractional p-Laplacian diffusion obey integral Harnack inequalities and that nonnegative solutions to the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem extinguish in finite time with explicit decay rates.

desk verdict New L1-L1 Harnack estimates and extinction rates for singular fractional p-Laplacian; the main theorem's proof has a time-ordered gap that needs a fix, but the core program looks sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.07647 v2 pith:KHZC3OM6 submitted 2026-02-07 math.AP

Filippo M. Cassanello , Simone Ciani , Antonio Iannizzotto This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35K6735B6535K9235Q35

keywords fractionalp-LaplaciansingulardiffusionHarnack-typeinequalityL1-L1Harnackestimateextinctiontimedecayratenonlocalparabolicequationsmeasurablekernels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper targets the singular range 1

What carries the argument

The core mechanism is an iterative De Giorgi-type energy argument combined with a nonlocal tail functional that measures long-range mass. The paper relies on a parabolic fractional Sobolev embedding and an energy estimate for solutions, quoted from prior work, and on a time-mollification procedure that allows admissible test functions even when solutions lack an integrable time derivative. The exponent λ1 = N(p-2)+ps controls the decay rates, while the tail term carries the far-field information needed for local statements.

What would settle it

Search for a measurable-kernel solution of (1.2) with p<2 and no integrable time derivative for which the quoted energy estimate (Proposition 2.4) fails, or run a high-resolution numerical scheme for the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem with p=1.5 and a discontinuous kernel and check whether the local mass obeys ((T*-t)/ρ^{λ1})^{1/(2-p)}; a counterexample to either would invalidate the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a locally bounded nonnegative local weak solution of u_t + L_K u = 0 satisfies the L1-L1 Harnack estimate: the supremum over time of the mass in a ball is controlled by the infimum over time of the mass in a larger ball, plus tail terms that capture long-range spatial influence. Chaining this with an Lr-L∞ estimate yields an L1-L∞ estimate in the supercritical range λ1 > 0. For the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem the same machinery, using time-mollified test functions, proves finite extinction: the solution is identically zero after a time T*, and the local mass obeys ∫_{Bρ} u(x,t)dx ≤ γ ((T*-t)/ρ^{λ1})^{1/(2-p)}, with a comparable sup-norm decay when λ1 > 0.

Load-bearing premise

The Harnack and extinction arguments depend on a quoted energy estimate and a fractional embedding that may require more time-regularity than the weak solutions of Definition 2.1 possess; if those estimates fail for measurable-kernel solutions without an integrable time derivative, the iteration collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every nonnegative bounded weak solution of the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem has a finite extinction time T* bounded by constants times powers of the initial norm, after which the solution is identically zero.
The local mass decays as ((T*-t)/ρ^{λ1})^{1/(2-p)} for all 1<p<2, uniformly up to the extinction time.
In the range 2N/(N+s)<p<2, the same estimates give a sup-norm decay rate with explicit tail corrections.
The L1-L1 Harnack inequality transfers mass bounds uniformly in time, making it a direct tool for Hölder continuity and initial-trace arguments.
All conclusions hold for measurable, bounded, symmetric kernels, not just the prototype fractional p-Laplacian, so they apply to anisotropic nonlocal media.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the quoted energy estimate holds for rougher solution classes, the same iteration should yield Harnack and extinction estimates for very weak or measure-valued solutions, extending the notion of solution.
The exponent 1/(2-p) is the fractional analogue of the fast p-Laplacian extinction exponent; numerical experiments for p<2 with discontinuous kernels could test whether this rate is optimal.
The L1-L1 estimate could be iterated with the fractional Sobolev embedding to produce a shorter route to Hölder continuity than existing oscillation arguments.
The tail terms suggest that in unbounded domains the decay rate depends on the far-field profile; checking whether a shrinking-tail condition recovers the global whole-space rates would clarify the role of the tail.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The paper proves L1-L1 and L1-L∞ Harnack inequalities for local weak solutions of u_t + L_K u = 0 with 1

The proof of Theorem 1.2 has a gap that the stress-test note correctly identifies. The authors choose t1 (argmax of B_n mass) and t2 (argmin of B_∞ mass) and assert WLOG t1≤t2. That is not a WLOG because the equation is not invariant under time reversal. If the max occurs after the min, the test-function computation integrates backward in time, and the resulting sign in front of the diffusive integral flips. The estimates that follow bound the forward diffusive integral from above; in the reversed case you need a lower bound (or an absolute value estimate) to get the same conclusion. The repair is straightforward — integrate over [min(t1,t2), max(t1,t2)] and bound the absolute value of the diffusive integral — but it is absent. Since Theorem 1.6(i) and Corollary 4.2 use Theorem 1.2, the extinction rate proof inherits this gap.

There are also two smaller display errors: Lemma 5.1's final inequality has a minus sign in front of the nonlocal term, while the preceding inequalities give a plus (the lemma statement is fine); and Theorem 1.4's statement writes (t^r/ρ^{λ_r})^{1/r} while the proof concludes with exponent 1/(2-p). The latter is likely a typo but should be fixed.

The references look appropriate, the proofs are long but mostly checkable, and the authors are careful about the solution notion. The ellipticity of the energy estimates is quoted from [33]; that is fine, though it means the Harnack estimates inherit whatever regularity hypotheses [33] carries.

Who should read this: people working on nonlocal parabolic regularity, initial traces, and extinction phenomena. It deserves peer review — the gap is fixable and the results are worth having. I would not cite it in its current form, but with the time-order issue repaired it would be a solid reference.

Recommendation: send it to a strong referee, and ask specifically for a check of Theorem 1.2's time ordering and the displayed exponent/sign issues in Theorems 1.4 and Lemma 5.1.

Best.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies local weak solutions (Definition 2.1) of the singular fractional diffusion equation u_t + L_K u = 0, where 1<p<2, s∈(0,1), and K is a measurable symmetric kernel satisfying two-sided bounds comparable to |x-y|^{-(N+ps)}. The main results are integral Harnack-type estimates: an L^r-L^∞ estimate (Theorem 1.1), an L^1-L^1 estimate (Theorem 1.2), an L^1-L^∞ estimate under λ_1>0 (Theorem 1.3), and a backward L^r-L^r estimate (Theorem 1.4), all with explicit nonlocal tail terms. These are then applied to the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem: Theorem 1.5 gives a finite extinction time T_* with quantitative bounds in terms of initial data, and Theorem 1.6 gives decay rates for the local mass and supremum as t approaches T_*. The proofs combine energy estimates and a fractional parabolic embedding quoted from Liao [33], a De Giorgi-type iteration, and a time-mollification argument in Appendix A that is specifically designed to avoid assuming an integrable time derivative.

Significance. If the results are correct, they constitute a substantial extension of the DiBenedetto–Gianazza–Vespri Harnack machinery to singular nonlocal fractional p-Laplacian operators with measurable kernels, and they provide quantitative extinction rates without relying on comparison principles. The explicit tail terms and the careful time-mollification lemmas in Appendix A are notable technical contributions. The paper is clearly written and the overall strategy is plausible. However, several load-bearing proof issues must be fixed before the results can be considered established.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, proof of Theorem 1.2, Eq. (4.14)] The statement 'Without loss of generality, we shall assume henceforth that 0≤t1≤t2≤t' is not a WLOG: equation (1.2) is not invariant under time reversal, and the test-function identity in Definition 2.1 is only applied on forward time intervals. If the time t1 realizing the supremum of ∫_{B_n}u occurs after the time t2 realizing the infimum over B∞, the boundary term in (4.14) changes sign and the subsequent estimates for J3, J4, J5 control the forward diffusive integral, not the reversed one. This gap is load-bearing because Theorem 1.6(i) is derived through Corollary 4.2 from Theorem 1.2. A repair likely exists by integrating over [min(t1,t2), max(t1,t2)] and bounding the signed diffusive integral by its absolute value using the same positive-part estimates, but the manuscript does not supply this argument.
[Section 5, Lemma 5.1] The final displayed inequality in the proof of Lemma 5.1 has a minus sign before the γ/σ^{N+ps} term, whereas the statement of the lemma and the preceding estimates (5.2), (5.3), (5.6) imply a plus sign. From 0 ≥ I_1 + I_2 and I_2 ≥ −G one obtains ∫_B u^r(t0) ≤ ∫_{B̂} u^r(0) + rG, not the printed inequality with minus. As written, the proof's concluding chain is internally inconsistent; the displayed sign should be corrected.
[Section 5, Theorem 1.4] The statement of Theorem 1.4 gives the perturbation term as γ (t^r/ρ^{λ_r})^{1/r}, but the proof's iteration step (with Lemma 2.6 and η=(2−p)/r) yields exponent 1/(2−p) in the final bound. These exponents differ for p∈(1,2), so the theorem as printed is not the statement that is proved. The proof appears to establish the exponent 1/(2−p); please correct the statement or adjust the proof accordingly.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2] Please add a sentence confirming that Propositions 2.3 and 2.4, quoted from [33], apply to local weak solutions in the sense of Definition 2.1 without any additional time-regularity assumption. The paper's stated novelty is avoiding an integrable time derivative, so the reader needs this compatibility stated explicitly.
[Section 4, Lemma 4.1] In the definition of A_τ the text reads 'u(x, τ)> u(x, τ)'; this should be 'u(x, τ)> u(y, τ)'.
[Section 6, proof of Theorem 1.5(i)] The displayed integration bound contains ∫_0^1 1dτ; this should be ∫_0^t 1dτ.
[Section 6, proof of Theorem 1.5(ii)] The final condition on t appears as 't ≥ γ∗ + C1 ∥u0∥...'; based on the preceding computation this should be 't ≥ (γ∗/C1) ∥u0∥^{2−p}_{L^2(Ω)} |Ω|^{λ_2/(2N)}'.
[Section 5, proof of Lemma 5.1] In the text 'Not that the estimates in (a), (b) above coincide' should read 'Note that'.
[Abstract/Keywords] The keyword phrase 'Harnack tipe inequality' contains a typo; it should be 'Harnack type inequality'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main estimates are derived from external energy/embedding results and self-contained mollification arguments; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The L1-L1 and L1-L∞ estimates (Theorems 1.2 and 1.3) are built on Propositions 2.3 and 2.4, which are quoted from Liao [33] for the same solution class as Definition 2.1, together with elementary recursive lemmas and a self-contained technical lemma (Lemma 4.1) whose proof is justified in Appendix A via time mollification. Theorem 1.1 is proven by De Giorgi-type iterations using those external energy estimates; local boundedness in the supercritical range is a conclusion, not an input, and in the subcritical range it is explicitly stated as an assumption. The extinction time T* in Theorem 1.5 is an output of ODE inequalities obtained by mollified testing, not a parameter fitted to the decay rates; the decay estimates of Theorem 1.6 then apply the Harnack estimates on (t,T*) and use the already-established extinction u(·,τ)=0 for τ≥T*. Citations to the authors' own works ([13]–[16], [25]) appear only in the introduction, overview, or future-applications remarks and do not supply any load-bearing theorem; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work of the authors. The WLOG t1≤t2 point in the proof of Theorem 1.2 is a potential correctness gap, not a circularity, since the argument is not being reduced to its own conclusion. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks for its main new estimates, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central estimates are built from established external tools (Sobolev embedding, energy estimates from Liao, mollification from Kinnunen–Lindqvist); no ad hoc free parameters or new entities are introduced. The main assumptions are the structural kernel conditions (K1)–(K2) and the existence/regularity of the weak solutions themselves.

assumptions (7)

standard math For u ∈ W^{s,p}_0(Ω), the fractional Sobolev embedding (2.1) holds with p_s^* = Np/(N−ps).
Used in Lemma A.4 to connect the L^q norm to the Gagliardo seminorm; stated as equation (2.1) in Section 2.
domain assumption Parabolic fractional embedding of Proposition 2.3 (from [33, Prop. A.3]).
Used in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.3 to estimate the L^{p(N+2s)/N} term; the paper does not prove this embedding.
domain assumption Energy estimate Proposition 2.4 (from [33, Cor. 2.1]) including the nonlocal tail term.
Primary iteration tool; the entire Harnack proof rests on this estimate, which is cited to Liao and not re-derived.
domain assumption For p > p_c, local weak solutions of (1.2) are locally bounded and Hölder continuous (from [33] and Remark 3.2).
Used to justify attainment of sup/inf and to apply Theorem 1.1; in the subcritical range 1<p≤p_c, local boundedness is explicitly assumed.
domain assumption Existence of bounded weak solutions to the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem (1.3) in the sense of Definition 2.2.
Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 are conditional on existence; the paper cites [35],[40] but notes these use different solution notions.
standard math Properties of exponential time mollification v_h, \bar{v}_h (Proposition A.1, from [33, Appendix B] and [31]).
Used throughout Appendix A to justify non-admissible test functions; the paper proves the main limits but relies on stated convergence and regularity properties.
standard math Fast convergence and interpolation lemmas (Lemmas 2.5, 2.6) from [22].
Used to close the De Giorgi iterations in Theorems 1.1 and 1.4.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integral Harnack estimates and the rate of extinction of singular fractional diffusion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KHZC3OM6

@misc{pith2026260207647,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integral Harnack estimates and the rate of extinction of singular fractional diffusion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KHZC3OM6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.07647}
}

read the original abstract

We prove several integral Harnack-type inequalities for local weak solutions of parabolic equations with measurable and bounded coefficients, describing singular s-fractional p-Laplacian diffusion. Then we apply the aforementioned estimates to evaluate the decay rate of the local mass and supremum of the solutions as they approach a possible extinction time. Yet we show consistency of our general decay estimates by studying the extinction phenomenon for weak solutions of the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem, by means of an approximation procedure that carefully avoids the use of an integrable time derivative.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07647 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Illustration of the extinction decay for a local weak solution to (1.3). Theorem 1.4. (Backward L r -L r estimate) Let u be a locally bounded solution of (1.2), nonnegative in B4ρ(x0) × (0, t) ⊂ ΩT , and u ∈ L r (R N × (0, T)) for some r > 1. Then, there exists γ > 0 depending on the data and r, s.t. sup 0<τ<t ˆ Bρ(x0) u r (x, τ ) dx ⩽ max n sup 0<τ<t ˆ Bc ρ (x0) u r +(x, τ ) dx, γ ˆ B2ρ(x0) u r (x, 0) dx + γ t r … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[33]

Liao,H¨ older regularity for parabolic fractionalp-Laplacian.Calc

N. Liao,H¨ older regularity for parabolic fractionalp-Laplacian.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 63 (2024) n. 22

2024
[1]

Abdellaoui, A

B. Abdellaoui, A. Attar, R. Bentifour, I. Peral,On fractional p-Laplacian parabolic problem with general data.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 197 (2018) 329-356

2018
[2]

Anceschi, M

F. Anceschi, M. Piccinini,Boundedness estimates for nonlinear nonlocal kinetic Kolmogorov-Fokker-Planck equations. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 32 (2025) n. 121

2025
[3]

Andreu-Vaillo, J

F. Andreu-Vaillo, J. M. Maz´ on, J.D. Rossi, J. Toledo, Nonlocal Diffusion Problems. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 165, AMS (2010)

2010
[4]

Antontsev, J.I

S.N. Antontsev, J.I. D ´ ıaz, S. Shmarev,Energy Methods for Free Boundary Problems: Applications to Nonlinear PDEs and Fluid Mechanics, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Springer, 2002

2002
[5]

Antontsev, S

S. Antontsev, S. Shmarev, Evolution PDEs with nonstandard growth conditions. Atlantis Studies in Differential Equations 4, 2015

2015
[6]

Bobaru, A

F. Bobaru, A. Larios, J. Zhao,Construction of a peridynamic model for viscous flow. J. Comput. Phys. 468 (2022) n. 111509

2022
[7]

B¨ ogelein, F

V. B¨ ogelein, F. Duzaar, U. Gianazza, N. Liao, C. Scheven,H¨ older continuity of the gradient of solutions to doubly non-linear parabolic equations.Preprint arXiv:2305.08539 (2023)

arXiv 2023

Show all 42 references

[8]

Bonforte, R.G

M. Bonforte, R.G. Iagar, J.L. V´ azquez,Local smoothing effects, positivity, and Harnack inequalities for the fast p-Laplacian equation.Adv. Math. 224 (2010) 2151-2215

2010
[9]

Brasco, E

L. Brasco, E. Lindgren, M. Str¨ omqvist,Continuity of solutions to a nonlinear fractional diffusion equation.J. Evol. Equ. 21 (2021) 4319-4381

2021
[10]

Caffarelli,Non-local diffusions, drifts and games.Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations - Abel Symposia, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 7 (2012)

L. Caffarelli,Non-local diffusions, drifts and games.Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations - Abel Symposia, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 7 (2012)

2012
[11]

Caffarelli, L

L. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre,An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 32(8), (2007), 1245-1260

2007
[12]

Caffarelli, A

L. Caffarelli, A. Vasseur,Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation.Ann. Math 171 (2010) 1903-1930

2010
[13]

Cassanello, F.G

F.M. Cassanello, F.G. D¨ uzg¨ un, A. Iannizzotto,H¨ older regularity for the fractionalp-Laplacian, revisited.Adv. Calc. Var. 10 (2025) 897–913

2025
[14]

Ciani, E

S. Ciani, E. Henriques,Harnack-type estimates and extinction in finite time for a class of anisotropic porous medium type equations.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 64 (2025) 1-35. 40 F.M. CASSANELLO, S. CIANI, A. IANNIZZOTTO

2025
[15]

Ciani, E

S. Ciani, E. Henriques, I.I. Skrypnik,The impact of intrinsic scaling on the rate of extinction for anisotropic non-Newtonian fast diffusion.Nonlinear Anal. 242 (2024) n. 113497

2024
[16]

Ciani, V

S. Ciani, V. Vespri,A new short proof of regularity for local weak solutions for a certain class of singular parabolic equations. Rend. Math. Appl. 41 (2020) 251-264

2020
[17]

Collier, D

T. Collier, D. Hauer,A doubly nonlinear evolution problem involving the fractional p-Laplacian.Preprint arXiv:2110.13401 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[18]

DiBenedetto, Degenerate parabolic equations

E. DiBenedetto, Degenerate parabolic equations. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York (1993)

1993
[19]

DiBenedetto, M.A

E. DiBenedetto, M.A. Herrero,Non-negative solutions of the evolution p-Laplacian equation. Initial traces and Cauchy problem when1< p <2.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 111 (1990) 225–290

1990
[20]

DiBenedetto, Y.C

E. DiBenedetto, Y.C. Kwong,Harnack estimates and extinction profile for weak solutions of certain singular parabolic equations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330 (1992) 783-811

1992
[21]

DiBenedetto, U

E. DiBenedetto, U. Gianazza, V. Vespri,Forward, backward and elliptic Harnack inequalities for non-negative solutions to certain singular parabolic partial differential equations.Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 9 (2010) 385-422

2010
[22]

DiBenedetto, U

E. DiBenedetto, U. Gianazza, V. Vespri, Harnack’s Inequality for Degenerate and Singular Parabolic Equations. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2012

2012
[23]

Di Castro, T

A. Di Castro, T. Kuusi, G. Palatucci,Nonlocal Harnack inequalities.J. Functional Analysis 267 (2014) 1807–1836

2014
[24]

Di Castro, T

A. Di Castro, T. Kuusi, G. Palatucci,Local behavior of fractional p-minimizers.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 33 (2016) 1279-1299

2016
[25]

D¨ uzg¨ un, A

F.G. D¨ uzg¨ un, A. Iannizzotto, V. Vespri,A clustering theorem in fractional Sobolev spaces.Ann. Fennici Math. 50 (2025) 243-252

2025
[26]

Emmrich, R

E. Emmrich, R. B. Lehoucq, D. Puhst,Peridynamics: A Nonlocal Continuum Theory.Meshfree Methods for Partial Differential Equations VI, Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science 89, 45–65
[27]

Iannizzotto,A survey on boundary regularity for the fractional p-Laplacian and its applications.Bruno Pini Math

A. Iannizzotto,A survey on boundary regularity for the fractional p-Laplacian and its applications.Bruno Pini Math. Anal. Sem. 15 (2024) 164-186

2024
[28]

Kassmann, M

M. Kassmann, M. Weidner,The parabolic Harnack inequality for nonlocal equations.Duke Math. J. 173 (2024) 3413-3451

2024
[29]

Kim, K.A

S. Kim, K.A. Lee,H¨ older estimates for singular non-local parabolic equations.J. Functional Analysis, 261 (2011) 3482-3518

2011
[30]

S. Yun, K. Kim,A H¨ older estimate with an optimal tail for nonlocal parabolic p-Laplace equations.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 203 (2024) 109-147

2024
[31]

Kinnunen, P

J. Kinnunen, P. Lindqvist,Pointwise behaviour of semicontinuous supersolutions to a quasilinear parabolic equation.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 185 (2006) 411-435

2006
[32]

Ladyzenskaya, N.A

O.A. Ladyzenskaya, N.A. Solonnikov and N.N. Ural’tzeva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1967

1967
[34]

Liao,On the modulus of continuity of solutions to nonlocal parabolic equations.J

N. Liao,On the modulus of continuity of solutions to nonlocal parabolic equations.J. London Math. Soc. 110 (2024) 1-30

2024
[35]

Maz´ on, J.D

J.M. Maz´ on, J.D. Rossi, J. Toledo,Fractional p-Laplacian evolution equations.J. Math. Pures Appl. 105 (2016) 810-844

2016
[36]

Prasad, V

H. Prasad, V. Tewary,Local boundedness of variational solutions to nonlocal double phase parabolic equations.J. Differential Equations 351 (2023) 243-276

2023
[37]

Silling,Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces.J

S.A. Silling,Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces.J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48 (2000) 175-209

2000
[38]

Str¨ omqvist,Local boundedness of solutions to non-local parabolic equations modeled on the fractional p-Laplacian.J

M. Str¨ omqvist,Local boundedness of solutions to non-local parabolic equations modeled on the fractional p-Laplacian.J. Differential Equations 266 (2019) 7948-7979

2019
[39]

V´ azquez,The fractional p-Laplacian evolution equation in in the sublinear case.Calc

J.L. V´ azquez,The fractional p-Laplacian evolution equation in in the sublinear case.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021) n. 140

2021
[40]

V´ azquez,The Dirichlet problem for the fractional p-Laplacian evolution equation.J

J.L. V´ azquez,The Dirichlet problem for the fractional p-Laplacian evolution equation.J. Differential Equations 260 (2016) 6038-6056

2016
[41]

V´ aquez,Nonlinear diffusion with fractional Laplacian operators.Nonlinear partial differential equations: the Abel Symposium 2010 (2012), 271-298

J.L. V´ aquez,Nonlinear diffusion with fractional Laplacian operators.Nonlinear partial differential equations: the Abel Symposium 2010 (2012), 271-298

2010
[42]

V´ azquez,Growing solutions of the fractional p-Laplacian equation in the fast diffusion range.Nonlinear Anal

J.L. V´ azquez,Growing solutions of the fractional p-Laplacian equation in the fast diffusion range.Nonlinear Anal. 214 (2022) n. 112575. (F.M. Cassanello, A. Iannizzotto)Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica Universit`a degli Studi di Cagliari Via Ospedale 72, 09124 Caglia...

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [33]

Liao,H¨ older regularity for parabolic fractionalp-Laplacian.Calc

N. Liao,H¨ older regularity for parabolic fractionalp-Laplacian.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 63 (2024) n. 22

2024

[2] [1]

Abdellaoui, A

B. Abdellaoui, A. Attar, R. Bentifour, I. Peral,On fractional p-Laplacian parabolic problem with general data.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 197 (2018) 329-356

2018

[3] [2]

Anceschi, M

F. Anceschi, M. Piccinini,Boundedness estimates for nonlinear nonlocal kinetic Kolmogorov-Fokker-Planck equations. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 32 (2025) n. 121

2025

[4] [3]

Andreu-Vaillo, J

F. Andreu-Vaillo, J. M. Maz´ on, J.D. Rossi, J. Toledo, Nonlocal Diffusion Problems. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 165, AMS (2010)

2010

[5] [4]

Antontsev, J.I

S.N. Antontsev, J.I. D ´ ıaz, S. Shmarev,Energy Methods for Free Boundary Problems: Applications to Nonlinear PDEs and Fluid Mechanics, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Springer, 2002

2002

[6] [5]

Antontsev, S

S. Antontsev, S. Shmarev, Evolution PDEs with nonstandard growth conditions. Atlantis Studies in Differential Equations 4, 2015

2015

[7] [6]

Bobaru, A

F. Bobaru, A. Larios, J. Zhao,Construction of a peridynamic model for viscous flow. J. Comput. Phys. 468 (2022) n. 111509

2022

[8] [7]

B¨ ogelein, F

V. B¨ ogelein, F. Duzaar, U. Gianazza, N. Liao, C. Scheven,H¨ older continuity of the gradient of solutions to doubly non-linear parabolic equations.Preprint arXiv:2305.08539 (2023)

arXiv 2023