Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Microscopic Rydberg electron orbit manipulation with optical tweezers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tightly focused laser beam reshapes a Rydberg electron's orbit into a giant, rapidly tunable dipole.

desk verdict Tight-focus tweezer tuning of Rydberg orbitals is real and worth reviewing, but the MHz-dipole-modulation claim needs non-adiabatic numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.15723 v3 pith:VK66VQ52 submitted 2026-02-17 physics.atom-ph

Homar Rivera-Rodríguez , Matthew T. Eiles , Tilman Pfau , Florian Meinert This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords Rydbergatomsopticaltweezersponderomotivepotentialelectricdipolemomentselectronwavefunctionsculptingadiabaticcurvestrilobitestatesultralong-rangemolecules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes using a tightly focused optical tweezer—whose beam waist is smaller than the Rydberg electron's orbit—to locally sculpt the electron's wavefunction. By computing the adiabatic eigenstates in the presence of the laser's ponderomotive potential, the authors find that the beam strongly mixes Rydberg states, creating permanent electric dipole moments of up to a few kilo-Debye. The same mechanism produces oscillatory potential-energy curves that can trap the atom in a sub-orbital region of space, and the dipole can be modulated at megahertz rates by varying the laser intensity. If correct, this would give single-atom control over a giant, rapidly reconfigurable electric dipole, with potential uses in sensing, quantum information, and Rydberg-atom arrays.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the adiabatic ponderomotive potential V_P(r;R_c) = e^2 I(X)/(2 m_e c ε0 ω^2) generated by the Gaussian tweezer beam, with the ratio η = w0/sν controlling the regime. In the tight-waist limit (η≪1) the potential becomes effectively a transverse delta function, making the coupling within the degenerate hydrogenic manifold low-rank; as a result, only a small set of axis-overlapping superpositions acquire large shifts, while the remaining states stay weakly perturbed. A semiclassical analysis yields universal scalings for the low-ℓ energy shifts—U_i ∼ C_1 P_0 NA_eff^2 η^{-2} F_i(R_c/(a0ν^2))—independent of ν at fixed η, with the dipole moment scaling as D_x ∼ P_0 η^2 ν^5. Th

What would settle it

Measure the dc Stark shift or the electric dipole moment of a Rydberg atom in a tightly focused tweezer as a function of the core's position relative to the beam; the predicted oscillatory potential curves and the ~ν^5 scaling of the dipole would be directly falsified if the observed shifts or dipoles deviate significantly. A time-resolved probe of the dipole under MHz intensity modulation would additionally test the adiabatic assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a focused optical tweezer with waist w0 smaller than the Rydberg orbital radius sν acts through the static ponderomotive potential to admix opposite-parity Rydberg states, yielding a permanent electric dipole in the core frame. For low-ℓ states (e.g., f-states), even a tiny symmetry breaking—relative asymmetry ~10^-3—produces dipole moments of order 1000 Debye because the orbit is microns in size; the dipole scales approximately as P0 η^2 ν^5, where η = w0/sν. For the quasi-degenerate high-ℓ hydrogenic manifold, the tight-waist limit reduces the coupling to a low-rank one-dimensional overlap, selecting strongly axis-localized 'trilobite-like' states with dipoles

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the laser's influence on the Rydberg electron is fully captured by a static, single-active-electron ponderomotive potential, with no significant non-adiabatic transitions and no dynamical response from the ionic core beyond a scalar polarizability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rydberg atoms can be trapped by the local reshaping of their electron orbit, even with the ionic core far from the beam focus, creating a new kind of ponderomotive atom trap.
  • The predicted universal scaling means that properties at large principal quantum numbers (ν≈200), where calculations are intractable, can be reliably extrapolated from smaller-ν results.
  • Adiabatic manipulation of the tweezer intensity allows MHz-bandwidth modulation of a giant permanent dipole, enabling a single-atom, locally controlled dipole antenna.
  • Adjacent Rydberg atoms can act as resonant receivers for the modulated dipole, opening a route to Rydberg-based sensing or communication.
  • Spectroscopic access via microwave coupling from low-ℓ states makes the strongly dipolar axis-localized states observable in current experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scaling holds beyond the studied parameter range, the same mechanism could be extended to even larger ν or to structured light fields (e.g., vortex beams), where the beam's orbital angular momentum might produce chiral or higher-multipole orbitals.
  • Multiple tweezers or tweezer arrays could create a lattice of coupled giant dipoles, enabling anisotropic, long-range dipole-dipole interactions that depend on the orientation of each reshaped orbital.
  • Because the trapping potential arises from the electron's reshaped orbit rather than the core polarizability, hybrid traps combining core-tweezer and electron-tweezer potentials could allow simultaneous control over both the atom's center of mass and its electronic configuration.
  • The MHz modulation bandwidth suggests that the dipole's phase and amplitude could be manipulated faster than typical Rydberg decay times (~100 μs), which might be exploited in quantum protocols or in the coherent control of dipole-dipole interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using a tightly focused optical tweezer, with waist smaller than the Rydberg orbit, to create a local ponderomotive potential that reshapes the Rydberg electron wavefunction. The authors set up a single-active-electron Hamiltonian with a static ponderomotive potential (Eqs. 1-2), diagonalize it in a Rydberg basis for 88Sr, and classify the resulting adiabatic potential-energy curves into low-ℓ quantum-defect states and the quasi-degenerate high-ℓ manifold. They report two central predictions: (i) the high-ℓ states become strongly localized near the tweezer axis and develop permanent dipole moments of order 1000 Debye at ν=60 and a few kilo-Debye at ν=200 after scaling; (ii) the low-ℓ PECs support oscillatory wells analogous to ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, allowing trapping of the Rydberg atom, and the dipole moments can be modulated at MHz bandwidth by fast tweezer-intensity control. The End Matter supplies the beam profile, matrix-element details, a tight-waist δ-function reduction, semiclassical scaling laws, and adiabatic state preparation in a magnetic field.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the paper would introduce a genuinely new tool for local orbital engineering in Rydberg systems, extending the physics of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules to a fully tunable optical perturbation. The numerical calculations appear internally coherent, and the semiclassical scaling law of Eq. (3) is derived rather than fitted, which is a strength. The paper also makes specific, falsifiable predictions: the shape of the PECs, the magnitude of the dipole moments, the existence of a trap minimum with ~20 kHz level spacing, and the possibility of MHz-bandwidth modulation. However, the dynamical modulation claim is not backed by a time-dependent or Landau-Zener analysis, and the basis-convergence statement for the central dipole numbers is asserted rather than demonstrated. These gaps are fixable, but they currently limit the certainty with which the headline claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, paragraph beginning 'In a second scenario...'; End Matter, 'Adiabatic state preparation and dipole moment mod] The central claim that the tweezer intensity can be modulated 'at MHz-scale bandwidth without detrimental non-adiabatic transfer between the eigenstates' is unsupported. The manuscript provides no Landau-Zener estimate, no time-dependent Schrödinger simulation, and no quantitative statement of the minimum gap vs. sweep rate for the proposed parameters. Figures 7 and 8 only address a slow ramp and the B-field dependence of the dipole moment, not a MHz modulation. Since the PEC splittings in Figs. 2 and 4 are of order MHz or smaller, the adiabatic condition is not obvious at MHz bandwidth, especially in the dense high-ℓ manifold. The authors should compute LZ exponents (or solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation) for the specific B-field, intensity-modulation amplitude, and frequency they recommend, and state the resulting upper bound on the modulation bandwidth.
  2. [End Matter, 'Numerical details'] The magnitudes of the dipole moments are central, but the basis-truncation convergence is asserted rather than shown. The statement that 'it suffices to consider only states within the target ν-manifold' for energies and 'requires including neighboring manifolds ν±1' for dipole moments is not accompanied by convergence data. Given that the high-ℓ dipole moments rely on near-degenerate manifolds and that only the nearest adjacent manifolds are included, a plot of D_x versus basis size or ℓmax would quantify the error bars on the kilo-Debye values and the extrapolated few-kilo-Debye estimate for ν=200. Without this, the quantitative central predictions are not fully established.
  3. [Eqs. (1)-(2) and following paragraph] The effective Hamiltonian is introduced phenomenologically; the paper keeps only the A² (ponderomotive) term for the Rydberg electron and only the scalar polarizability for the core. Under the stated adiabatic approximation this is standard, but the Letter should explicitly justify the neglect of the p·A term, the laser electric field's direct effect on the Rydberg electron, and any vector/tensor contributions to the core potential, especially in the tight-focus regime with strong field gradients. A short derivation, or a clear reference to Ref. [12] with the relevant approximations spelled out, would remove a load-bearing assumption from the formalism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure captions, Figs. 2 and 4] The vertical axes of the dipole-moment panels are unlabeled in the text/captions. Please state the units (presumably Debye) explicitly, and define the energy-axis units for U_{νℓ} as well.
  2. [End Matter, 'Tight-waist limit', Eq. (8)] In the definition of f_{ii′}(z), both wavefunctions carry the primed indices ν′ℓ′m′; this appears to be a typo. The matrix element should involve ψ_{νℓm}(-R_c,0,z) and ψ_{ν′ℓ′m′}(-R_c,0,z), or the notation should be clarified.
  3. [Numerical details and Sec. II] The paper should state explicitly which ℓ values are included in the 'high-ℓ manifold' and how the quantum-defect states with ℓ≤5 are handled within the full ν-manifold. The basis-size formula ν²+2(ℓmaxQD+1)² suggests this, but it is not stated in the main text.
  4. [End Matter, 'Adiabatic state preparation and dipole moment modulation'] The sentence 'This persists until the Zeeman splitting becomes large enough to bring the f and g blocks into near-degeneracy, where additional resonant mixing can strongly modify the state's character' is important but not quantified. A brief statement of the B-field range over which the single-PEC isolation is valid would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained numerical diagonalization plus analytically derived scaling; extrapolations are predictions, not renamed fits.

full rationale

The central results are obtained by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with the standard ponderomotive potential (Eq. 2), using an explicitly stated 88Sr basis. The scaling law (Eq. 3) is derived from a semiclassical analysis of the matrix elements in the w0→0 limit (End Matter, Eqs. 8-10), not fitted to the target data. The extrapolation to nu=200 in Fig. 3(b) and the inferred kilo-Debye dipole moments follow from these analytic scalings and are predictions beyond the computed nu=40-80 data; they are not inputs. The few self-citations (e.g., [15], [24], [28], [33], [35]-[37]) are contextual or forward-looking and are not load-bearing for the claimed dipole/trapping results. The assertion of MHz-scale adiabatic modulation is not supported by a non-adiabatic estimate, but that is a correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity; it does not make any prediction equal to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; it uses standard quantum mechanics. The main assumptions are the single-active-electron and adiabatic approximations, and the choice of realistic laser parameters. These are reasonable but not rigorously proven from first principles.

free parameters (3)
  • Laser power P0 = 100 mW
    Fixed to a typical experimental value, but used to compute all energies and dipoles. Not fitted, but a chosen input.
  • Effective numerical aperture NAeff = 0.3
    Chosen to be realistic, but directly determines the beam waist and thus the parameter η.
  • Wavelength λ and waist w0 = e.g., 460 nm and 480 nm for ν=200
    Chosen to achieve η~0.1; these values enter the potential and scaling.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Single-active-electron approximation
    Assumed to reduce the two-electron problem to a single Rydberg electron interacting with a frozen core.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic approximation for the Rydberg electron and center-of-mass motion
    Justified by frequency disparity, but used to replace the time-dependent laser field with a static ponderomotive potential (Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption The ponderomotive potential is the dominant electron-light interaction
    Neglects other light-induced couplings like the ac Stark shift beyond the ponderomotive term, which is standard for Rydberg electrons.
  • ad hoc to paper Basis truncation: target ν-manifold plus adjacent manifolds for dipole moments
    Numerical method; convergence is asserted but not rigorously proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microscopic Rydberg electron orbit manipulation with optical tweezers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VK66VQ52

@misc{pith2026260215723,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microscopic Rydberg electron orbit manipulation with optical tweezers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VK66VQ52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.15723}
}
read the original abstract

Laser cooling and trapping of atomic matter waves in optical potentials has enabled rapid progress in quantum science, particularly when combined with Rydberg excitation of the atoms to induce long-range interactions. Here, we propose the local manipulation and spatio-temporal sculpting of the electronic matter wave of a Rydberg atom by a laser field focused so that its beam width is smaller than the Rydberg electron orbit. We compute the electronic eigenstates in the presence of a sharply focused Gaussian laser beam, and find strong Rydberg state mixing leading to large kilo-Debye dipole moments. These can be modulated with high bandwidth controlled by the local tweezer intensity. Oscillations in the position-dependent level shifts, analogous to the potential wells allowing ultralong-range Rydberg molecules to form, provide opportunities for eccentric radial trapping of the Rydberg electron via ponderomotive forces acting on sub-orbital length scales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15723 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental scheme and definition of coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Ponderomotive energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Electron density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. PECs for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dipole moment of the perturbed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Energy splitting evolution while ramping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal response of Rydberg manifolds to standing light waves from the microwave to the X-ray regime

    physics.atom-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rydberg atoms show five universal regimes of electron density response to standing light waves, with transitions at critical wavelengths determined from lattice spectrum bandwidth and density organization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [12]

    S. K. Dutta, J. R. Guest, D. Feldbaum, A. Walz- Flannigan, and G. Raithel, Ponderomotive optical lattice for Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5551 (2000)

    2000

  2. [1]

    Schr¨ odinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem, Annalen der Physik384, 361 (1926)

    E. Schr¨ odinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem, Annalen der Physik384, 361 (1926)

    1926

  3. [2]

    Heitler and F

    W. Heitler and F. London, Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und hom¨ oopolare Bindung nach der Quanten- mechanik, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik44, 455 (1927)

    1927

  4. [3]

    Bloch, ¨Uber die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik52, 555 (1929)

    F. Bloch, ¨Uber die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik52, 555 (1929)

    1929

  5. [4]

    F. J. Giessibl, Advances in atomic force microscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 949 (2003)

    2003

  6. [5]

    D. Wang, T. Haposan, J. Fan, Arramel, and A. T. S. Wee, Recent progress of imaging chemical bonds by scan- ning probe microscopy: A review, ACS Nano18, 30919 (2024)

    2024

  7. [6]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics, Vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    1994

  8. [7]

    J. B. Balewski, A. T. Krupp, A. Gaj, D. Peter, H. P. B¨ uchler, R. L¨ ow, S. Hofferberth, and T. Pfau, Coupling a single electron to a Bose-Einstein condensate, Nature 502, 664 (2013)

    2013

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    K. S. Kleinbach, F. Engel, T. Dieterle, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Ionic impurity in a Bose-Einstein con- densate at submicrokelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 193401 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    F. B. Dunning, J. J. Mestayer, C. O. Reinhold, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Engineering atomic Ryd- berg states with pulsed electric fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics42, 022001 (2009)

    2009

  3. [10]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    K. C. Younge, B. Knuffman, S. E. Anderson, and G. Raithel, State-dependent energy shifts of Rydberg atoms in a ponderomotive optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 173001 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Boulier, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Three- dimensional trapping of individual Rydberg atoms in ponderomotive bottle beam traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 023201 (2020). 6

    2020

  7. [15]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-lived circular Rydberg qubits of alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021024 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range Rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    J. P. Shaffer, S. T. Rittenhouse, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultracold Rydberg molecules, Nature Communications9, 1965 (2018)

    1965

  10. [18]

    M. T. Eiles, Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic spec- imens of long-range rydberg molecules, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.52, 113001 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    F. B. Dunning, S. K. Kanungo, and S. Yoshida, Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 212002 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, Ryd- berg atom quantum technologies, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012002 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    See End Matter for details and to see howF i ℓ can be expressed in terms of Elliptic Integrals

  14. [22]

    B. J. DeSalvo, J. A. Aman, F. B. Dunning, T. C. Kil- lian, H. R. Sadeghpour, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Ultra-long-range Rydberg molecules in a divalent atomic system, Phys. Rev. A92, 031403 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    A. Gaj, A. T. Krupp, J. B. Balewski, R. L¨ ow, S. Hof- ferberth, and T. Pfau, From molecular spectra to a den- sity shift in dense Rydberg gases, Nat Commun5, 4546 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    M. T. Eiles, Z. Tong, and C. H. Greene, Theoretical pre- diction of the creation and observation of a ghost trilo- bite chemical bond, Physical review letters121, 113203 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth Rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033201 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Pendse, S

    A. Pendse, S. W¨ uster, M. T. Eiles, and A. Eisfeld, Trans- ferring vibrational states of trapped atoms via a Rydberg electron, New Journal of Physics27, 043010 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    J. D. Rodrigues, L. G. Marcassa, and J. T. Mendon¸ ca, Excitation of high orbital angular momentum Rydberg states with Laguerre–Gauss beams, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 074007 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Mukherjee, S

    K. Mukherjee, S. Majumder, P. K. Mondal, and B. Deb, Interaction of a Laguerre–Gaussian beam with trapped Rydberg atoms, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics51, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    E. L. Hamilton, C. H. Greene, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular Rydberg states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics35, L199 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and J. M. Rost, Dressed ion-pair states of an ultralong-range Ryd- berg molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 123401 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    M. T. Eiles, H. Lee, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, and C. H. Greene, Anisotropic blockade using pendular long-range Rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A95, 052708 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Rivera-Rodr ´ ıguez and R

    H. Rivera-Rodr ´ ıguez and R. J´ auregui, On the elec- trostatic interactions involving long-range Rydberg molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics54, 175101 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    trilobite

    Physikalisches Institut and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology, Universit¨ at Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany (Dated: April 7, 2026) Laser cooling and trapping of atomic matter waves in optical potentials has enabled rapid progress in ...

    2026 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A. L. Hunter, M. T. Eiles, A. Eisfeld, and J. M. Rost, Rydberg composites, Phys. Rev. X10, 031046 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    M. T. Eiles, A. Eisfeld, and J. M. Rost, Anderson local- ization of a Rydberg electron, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033032 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    M. T. Eiles, C. W. W¨ achtler, A. Eisfeld, and J. M. Rost, Topological edge states in a Rydberg composite, Phys. Rev. B109, 075422 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Patsch,Control of Rydberg atoms for quantum tech- nologies, Ph.D

    S. Patsch,Control of Rydberg atoms for quantum tech- nologies, Ph.D. thesis, Freien Universit at Berlin, Berlin (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Kiruga, C

    A. Kiruga, C. Cheung, D. Filin, P. Barakhshan, A. Bhos- ale, V. Badhan, B. Arora, R. Eigenmann, and M. S. Safronova, Portal for high-precision atomic data and computation (2025), arXiv:2506.08170 [physics.atom- ph]. 7 End Matter Details of the ponderomotive potential The inten...

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    (8) gives the effective potential of Eq

    The leading term of Eq. (8) gives the effective potential of Eq. (4). Using the symmetry ofψ νℓm(φ=π) underm→ −m, the interaction matrix can be diagonalized ex- actly within each low-ℓblock by working with real com- binations ofmstates defined, form>0, as|c m⟩ := (|m⟩+ (−1) m ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.