Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Diversity in Lyman Continuum Escape at $z\sim0.3$ Revealed by WISE Infrared Observations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Mid-infrared photometry separates local strong Lyman-continuum leakers into two physically distinct populations with different escape mechanisms.

desk verdict A credible WISE-based split of local LyC leakers into IR-bright and IR-faint populations, with the IR-bright ones showing surprisingly low O32 despite high f_esc; the two-mechanism interpretation is plausible but not yet nailed down due to mass selection and small numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.01472 v2 pith:IRICLJVC submitted 2026-03-02 astro-ph.GA

Fang-Ting Yuan , Zhen-Ya Zheng , Chunyan Jiang , Shuairu Zhu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Lymancontinuumescapecosmicreionizationstar-forminggalaxiesinfraredemissionO32ratiofractioninterstellarmediumgeometrydusty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses space-based mid-infrared photometry to split 20 strong Lyman-continuum (LyC) leakers at z~0.3 into 8 infrared-detected and 12 infrared-undetected galaxies. The two groups differ systematically: infrared-undetected leakers have high O32 ratios, blue UV slopes, low masses, and fit a density-bound, dust-poor escape; infrared-detected leakers have ordinary O32 and UV slopes yet still escape at a median f_esc~12%, pointing to a clumpy, ionization-bound ISM with low-column-density channels. The authors argue that significant LyC escape can coexist with substantial infrared emission, so dusty star-forming galaxies may contribute meaningfully to cosmic reionization. Why it matters: the result challenges the widespread assumption that strong leakers are necessarily extreme, metal-poor dwarfs, and suggests that standard UV/optical diagnostics miss a class of dusty leakers.

What carries the argument

The argument turns on the binary classification of each galaxy as infrared-detected or infrared-undetected using 2σ detections in at least one of the four mid-infrared passbands. That split correlates with a set of independent diagnostics: O32 (the [Oiii]5007/[Oii]3727 ratio) as a proxy for global ionization, the UV continuum slope β1200, stellar mass, E(B−V), Lyα line-profile shape (peak separation and asymmetry, e.g., v_peak and v_sep), and 3/6 GHz radio continuum. The proposed physical mechanism is a 'picket-fence' geometry: in a clumpy, ionization-bound medium, LyC photons leak through low-column-density holes while dust in dense clumps radiates in the infrared; because the escape is ani

What would settle it

Deep mid-infrared or submillimeter imaging of the 12 IR-undetected strong leakers that reveals dust masses comparable to the IR-detected group (currently ~10^7.2 solar masses) would falsify the dust-poor, density-bound interpretation; conversely, spatially resolved spectroscopy showing the IR-detected leakers do not possess low-column-density channels (e.g., no ionized sightlines with reduced neutral hydrogen column) would falsify the picket-fence mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that infrared emission reveals two coexisting escape pathways among local strong LyC leakers. The infrared-undetected population (12 galaxies) shows high O32, blue β1200, low stellar masses, and low extinction, consistent with a density-bound ISM where the entire galaxy is highly ionized and nearly dust-free. The infrared-detected population (8 galaxies) shows O32 and β1200 comparable to non-leakers, yet retains a median escape fraction of ~12%, with low nebular extinction despite strong infrared luminosity. The paper interprets these as ionization-bound systems with a porous, clumpy ISM where LyC photons escape through localized low-column-density channels, a picture su

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that mid-infrared detection at the fixed survey sensitivity marks a physical difference in dust content and ISM geometry, rather than largely tracking galaxy mass, star formation rate, or distance — the IR-detected strong leakers are more massive and have higher star formation rates, so the split could partly be a selection effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the two-mechanism picture is right, high-O32-based selection and UV-slope diagnostics will miss a substantial fraction of strong leakers, biasing census estimates of the ionizing photon budget.
  • Dusty, more massive star-forming galaxies, including mergers, should be added to reionization models as non-negligible contributors alongside low-mass dwarfs.
  • The IR-detected leakers' escape fraction stays at ~12% even after accounting for IR-based SFR corrections, so the claim withstands the main systematic check.
  • Lyα profile criteria for identifying leakers will need to be expanded to cover the anisotropic, clumpy-ISM case, where large peak separations or red asymmetries may still accompany strong escape.
  • The correspondence between IR, radio, and merger morphology suggests that interaction-driven gas fragmentation creates the channels, linking local observations to high-redshift leakers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: stacking the mid-infrared images of the IR-undetected strong leakers should reveal whether their non-detection is truly due to low dust mass or merely to sensitivity limits; if deep stacking finds substantial dust, the two-population claim would need revision.
  • If the picket-fence mechanism holds, spatially resolved spectroscopy and narrowband LyC imaging of IR-detected leakers should locate escaping radiation in regions offset from the dusty cores, analogous to the spatially offset LyC seen in some high-redshift sources.
  • The merger-driven interpretation implies that merger fraction should rise with IR detection among leakers; measuring this in a larger, selection-controlled sample would test the claimed dichotomy.
  • The paper's ionizing budget fractions (67% vs 20%) rest on a potentially non-representative sample; a volume-limited local survey would be needed to see if IR-detected dusty leakers are truly common enough to matter for reionization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. Using the Low-redshift Lyman Continuum Survey (LzLCS), the paper studies WISE 3.4–22 μm data for 89 z~0.3 star-forming galaxies and divides the 20 strong LyC leakers (f_esc>5%) into 8 IR-detected and 12 IR-undetected sources. It reports that IR-undetected strong leakers have high O32, blue β1200, low stellar mass, and low E(B−V), while IR-detected strong leakers have O32 and β1200 comparable to non-leakers but maintain median f_esc≈12%, have higher stellar mass and SFR, and are more likely to show merger morphology in HST images. The paper interprets these two groups as density-bound and ionization-bound porous ('picket-fence') escape mechanisms and connects them to compact starbursts and merger-driven leakers at z>3.

Significance. If established, the result broadens the types of galaxies that can contribute to reionization and questions the use of extreme UV/optical properties as universal leaker diagnostics. The paper is empirically driven, uses a well-defined sample, cross-checks O32 against Flury et al. (90% agreement), and includes permutation/bootstrap tests and a CIGALE-based f_esc robustness check. The weaknesses are the unaddressed confounding between IR detection and stellar mass/SFR and the small, partially selected subsets used for morphology/Lyα arguments.

major comments (3)
  1. [2.2, 3.2, Table 2] The central dichotomy rests on O32 (§3.2), but the two samples are not matched in the properties known to drive O32. Table 2 shows IR-detected strong leakers have log M* = 9.22 versus 8.45 for IR-undetected, log SFR_Hβ = 1.40 versus 1.13, and redder β1200. Because O32 is strongly anti-correlated with stellar mass/metallicity, the permutation test (p=0.002) on raw O32 medians may simply reflect this known scaling. The paper neither reports WISE non-detection upper limits nor performs a mass/SFR/metallicity-matched comparison. Please add such a control (e.g., stratified comparison, partial correlation, or regression with M*, SFR, 12+log(O/H)) and show the O32 difference is not driven by these covariates. This is load-bearing because the 'two mechanisms' conclusion depends on the O32 contrast being a signature of ISM geometry rather than a selection artifact.
  2. [3.3, 4.1] The interpretation of IR-detected leakers as having a global porous/picket-fence ISM is affected by the COS/WISE aperture mismatch. The COS LyC aperture samples a small line of sight, while WISE measures galaxy-integrated 12/22 μm emission. The observed combination—substantial f_esc, low nebular reddening, high mid-IR luminosity—could arise from a locally clear sightline in a globally dusty galaxy without requiring a global low-column-density channel. The paper should explicitly discuss this scale mismatch and either support the global geometry claim with spatially resolved IR/optical data or soften the interpretation.
  3. [4.2, Figure 3] The morphological dichotomy is inferred from HST imaging of only 11 of 20 strong leakers, with no stated classification criteria or blind rating, and the Lyα profile analysis uses only 9 strong leakers (2 IR-detected). The claim that IR-detected leakers are merger-driven and IR-undetected are compact starbursts is therefore supported by a handful of objects. Please provide either quantitative morphology (e.g., Gini/M20, concentration) for the full sample or explicitly label this as suggestive rather than a result. This affects the high-z connection made in §4.2.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs §2.1] The abstract states 'S/N_LyC > 3', while §2.1 defines secure LyC detection as S/N>5. Please reconcile.
  2. [Figure 2] The legend contains 'Total Trend (1- )' with an incomplete expression. Please also specify how the detection fraction and its bins are computed.
  3. [Table 2] Add units and sample sizes per line. The entry 'logM_dust' is undefined for non-detections; also give the WISE detection threshold used in §2.2 and the redshift distribution of the two subsamples.
  4. [Section 2.2] Cite the AllWISE catalog (Cutri et al. 2013) for the sensitivity limits, not only Wright et al. 2010.
  5. [Section 1] The phrase 'we find it imperative' is editorializing; consider rephrasing. Also note the paper title and abstract differ ('Diversity...' vs 'Two Lyman Continuum Escape Mechanisms...'); please harmonize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WISE-based IR split, O32 measurements, and f_esc values are independent empirical inputs, and the high-z analogies are interpretive rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central comparison is empirical rather than derived: strong leakers are split by WISE detection (Section 2.2), O32 is measured from SDSS spectra and cross-checked against Flury et al. (2022a) (Section 2.3), and f_esc is taken from the LzLCS catalog. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; the CIGALE SED check only adjusts f_esc modestly. The inference of two escape mechanisms rests on independent observables: O32 differences, UV slopes, Lyα profile shapes, radio detections, and HST morphologies. The citations to Yuan et al. (2024) and Zhu et al. (2025) provide a high-redshift interpretive analogy ('could potentially align with'), but the low-redshift classification and the O32/f_esc contrast do not depend on those papers. Thus the self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper itself flags the main non-circular concern in Section 5: 'This work is limited by the small sample size and a potential selection bias toward extreme star-forming systems' and 'the sensitivity and resolution of WISE data restrict our investigation of the IR-faint population.' That limitation points to possible mass/SFR confounding, not to circularity. No equation or quantity reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's inference rests on a chain of observational assumptions rather than mathematical derivation. Most important are the reliability of LzLCS f_esc values, WISE detection as a proxy for dust content, the representativeness of SDSS-fiber reddening for the LyC sightline, and the mapping from Lyα/radio/morphology to escape geometry. No free parameters are fitted in a predictive sense; the hand-chosen thresholds are the WISE detection and strong-leaker definitions. The 'picket-fence' channel geometry is an interpretive construct without direct independent evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • WISE IR detection threshold
    >2σ detection in at least one WISE band after visual screening defines the two populations that form the central claim; chosen by hand, not derived.
  • Strong-leaker definition thresholds
    S/N_LyC>5 and f_esc>0.05 (body text; S/N>3 in abstract) adopted from Flury et al. 2022b / Saldana-Lopez et al. 2022; determines the 20-object sample.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption LzLCS LyC escape fractions and the strong/weak/non-leaker classification are accurate.
    The sample and f_esc values are adopted wholesale from Flury et al. 2022a,b; the central split uses these classifications.
  • domain assumption WISE IR detection at the fixed sensitivity threshold is a meaningful dichotomy for dust content.
    IR-undetected leakers are treated as dust-poor and IR-detected as dusty; no distance/luminosity matching is applied (Section 2.2, Table 2).
  • domain assumption SDSS-fiber E(B−V) is representative of the line of sight through which LyC escapes.
    Low E(B−V) in IR-bright leakers is interpreted as spatial decoupling from dust; aperture mismatch between SDSS fiber and WISE beam is not quantified (Section 3.3).
  • ad hoc to paper Escape through low-column-density channels in a clumpy ISM explains low O32 with high f_esc.
    The picket-fence/porous geometry is introduced to reconcile the surprising IR-detected leaker properties; it is not directly measured.
  • domain assumption Verhamme et al. (2015) Lyα criteria and Kakiichi & Gronke (2021) asymmetry diagnostics trace HI column density and escape geometry at z~0.3.
    Used to classify the 9 strong leakers with COS G160M Lyα profiles (Section 4.1).
  • domain assumption CIGALE SED fitting with Draine et al. (2014) dust models gives reliable dust masses and adjusted f_esc.
    Dust masses for 25 IR-detected galaxies and the f_esc revision depend on these model choices (Sections 3.1 and Table 2).
  • domain assumption HST morphologies of 11 strong leakers correctly distinguish merger from compact systems and map to escape modes.
    The merger/starburst correspondence is based on visual classification of a subsample (Section 4.2, Figure 3).
invented entities (1)
  • Low-column-density escape channels ('picket-fence' holes) in a clumpy, dusty ISM
    purpose: To explain how IR-bright leakers have high f_esc (~12%) despite low O32 and high dust luminosity; allows LyC to escape anisotropically while most photons are absorbed and re-emitted in IR.
    No direct imaging or spectroscopy of such channels is provided; support is indirect (low fiber E(B−V), Lyα profiles, radio/IR brightness, morphology). The paper itself calls this a 'plausible explanation' (Section 3.2) and says these systems 'could potentially be described by' an ionization-bound porous geometry (Section 4.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diversity in Lyman Continuum Escape at $z\sim0.3$ Revealed by WISE Infrared Observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IRICLJVC

@misc{pith2026260301472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diversity in Lyman Continuum Escape at $z\sim0.3$ Revealed by WISE Infrared Observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IRICLJVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.01472}
}
abstract

The escape of Lyman continuum (LyC) radiation from star-forming galaxies plays a key role in cosmic reionization. While strong LyC leakers are commonly identified through ultraviolet (UV) and optical diagnostics, their infrared (IR) emission remains poorly explored. We use data from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) to investigate a sample of local star-forming galaxies, which contains 20 strong LyC leakers ($S/N_\mathrm{LyC} > 3$ and $f_{\rm esc}>5\%$) and 69 non-leakers. Among the strong leakers, 8 are classified with mid-IR detections. Comparing the IR-detected and IR-undetected subsamples, we find that the IR-undetected strong leakers exhibit higher [\ion{O}{3}]5007/[\ion{O}{2}]3726,3729 (O32) ratios, bluer UV slopes, and lower metallicities than the other subsamples. In contrast, the IR-detected strong leakers show O32 ratios, UV slopes, and metallicities comparable to those of non-leakers, while maintaining a median escape fraction of $f_{\rm esc}\sim12\%$. These results indicate that significant LyC escape is not limited to galaxies with the most extreme UV and optical properties and can coexist with substantial IR emission. The Ly$\alpha$ profiles and the morphology of the IR-detected and IR-undetected strong leakers imply that LyC photon escape in these two classes may be driven by different mechanisms. Our results highlight the diversity of LyC leakers and suggest that dusty star-forming galaxies may contribute a considerable amount to the ionizing photon budget during cosmic reionization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.01472 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (top). Within the strong leaker population, IR￾undetected sources exhibit systematically higher escape fractions than IR-detected ones (median fesc = 32.6% vs. 12.4%). Despite this internal difference, IR-detected strong leakers still maintain fesc values significantly ex￾ceeding those of the weak leakers, whose fesc remain consistently low (median ≤ 3%) regardless of IR detec￾tion. To check for potential fesc overe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. LyC detection fraction as a function of logO32. The IR-undetected systems (blue squares) show a rising LyC detection fraction with increasing O32 (blue dashed line), consistent with O32 tracing globally high ionization condi￾tions. In contrast, the IR-detected strong leakers (red dots) exhibit an approximately constant detection fraction across the full O32 range (red dashed line), indicating that their LyC escape i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. HST images for strong LyC leakers (fesc > 5%). Top: IR-detected strong leakers. Bottom: IR-undetected strong leakers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023, A&A, 671, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245400

    ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Crespo G´ omez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245400

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245400 2023

  2. [2]

    2024, A&A, 688, A198, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348416

    Bait, O., Borthakur, S., Schaerer, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A198, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348416

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348416 2024

  3. [3]

    2006, A&A, 448, 513, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053788

    Bergvall, N., Zackrisson, E., Andersson, B.-G., et al. 2006, A&A, 448, 513, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053788

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053788 2006

  4. [4]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  5. [5]

    M., Leitherer, C., & Overzier, R

    Borthakur, S., Heckman, T. M., Leitherer, C., & Overzier, R. A. 2014, Science, 346, 216, doi: 10.1126/science.1254214

    doi:10.1126/science.1254214 2014

  6. [6]

    2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    2020, A&A, 637, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937143

    Burgarella, D., Nanni, A., Hirashita, H., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937143

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937143 2020

  8. [8]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    doi:10.1086/167900 1989

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    Chisholm, J., Saldana-Lopez, A., Flury, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    C., et al

    Cormier, D., Lebouteiller, V., Madden, S. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219818

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2013, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release

    2013

  4. [12]

    Products, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products, by R. M. Cutri et al. de Barros, S., Vanzella, E., Amor ´ ın, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527046

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    2001, A&A, 375, 805, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010920

    Deharveng, J.-M., Buat, V., Le Brun, V., et al. 2001, A&A, 375, 805, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010920

    2001 doi

  6. [14]

    T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al

    Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Jaskot, A

    Flury, S. R., Jaskot, A. E., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2022a, ApJS, 260, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5331 —. 2022b, ApJ, 930, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac61e4

    doi

  8. [16]

    A., Schouws, S., et al

    Fudamoto, Y., Oesch, P. A., Schouws, S., et al. 2021, Nature, 597, 489, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03846-z

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    P., Heckman, T., Aloisi, A., et al

    Grimes, J. P., Heckman, T., Aloisi, A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 272, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/272

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Jaiswar, R., et al

    Gupta, A., Trott, C. M., Jaiswar, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.13285, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.13285

    2024 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    M., Sembach, K

    Heckman, T. M., Sembach, K. R., Meurer, G. R., et al. 2001, ApJ, 558, 56, doi: 10.1086/322475

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Borthakur, S., Overzier, R., et al

    Heckman, T. M., Borthakur, S., Overzier, R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/5

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    L., Gronke, M., et al

    Hu, W., Martin, C. L., Gronke, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceefd

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    I., Orlitov´ a, I., Schaerer, D., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Orlitov´ a, I., Schaerer, D., et al. 2016a, Nature, 529, 178, doi: 10.1038/nature16456

    doi

  15. [23]

    I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T. X., et al. 2016b, MNRAS, 461, 3683, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1205

    doi

  16. [24]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2018a, MNRAS, 474, 4514, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3115

    doi

  17. [25]

    I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2018b, MNRAS, 478, 4851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1378

    doi

  18. [26]

    E., Silveyra, A

    Jaskot, A. E., Silveyra, A. C., Plantinga, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad58b9

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    Ji, Z., Alberts, S., Zhu, Y., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2d9

    Kakiichi, K., & Gronke, M. 2021, ApJ, 908, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc2d9

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Wisotzki, L., et al

    Kerutt, J., Oesch, P. A., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346656

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    S., Boone, F., et al

    Laporte, N., Ellis, R. S., Boone, F., et al. 2017, ApJL, 837, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa62aa Le Reste, A., Jaskot, A. E., Brazie, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.06922, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.06922 Le Reste, Alexandra. 2025, Source data for LaCOS (LeReste+202...

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    Leitet, E., Bergvall, N., Hayes, M., Linn´ e, S., & Zackrisson, E. 2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    Lowenthal, J. D. 1995, ApJL, 454, L19, doi: 10.1086/309760

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 524, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2187

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 524, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2187

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, A&A, 691, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451667

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451667

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2025, A&A, 701, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553760

    Mascia, S., Pentericci, L., Llerena, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553760

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.17746, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.17746

    Maulick, S., & Saha, K. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.17746, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.17746

    2026 doi

  29. [37]

    Maulick, S., Saha, K., & Rutkowski, M. J. 2025, ApJ, 984, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc10e

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    2018, astroscrappy: Speed-optimized L.A.Cosmic, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1482018, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1482018

    McCully, C., & others. 2018, astroscrappy: Speed-optimized L.A.Cosmic, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1482018, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1482018

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Stark, D. P. 2020, ApJ, 889, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6604

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497 10Yuan et al

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497 10Yuan et al

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    A., Heckman, T

    Overzier, R. A., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 203, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/203

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    C., et al

    Pahl, A., Shapley, A., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 212, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad725d

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    J., Shapley, A., Steidel, C

    Pahl, A. J., Shapley, A., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 3247, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad774

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    E., Le Reste, A., Hayes, M

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Le Reste, A., Hayes, M. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.19967, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.19967

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    2025, ApJ, 992, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adff5e

    Roy, N., Heckman, T., Henry, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adff5e

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    N., Simmonds, C., et al

    Saha, K., Tandon, S. N., Simmonds, C., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1185, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1173-5

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    2022, A&A, 663, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141864

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Schaerer, D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141864

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    2011, A&A, 531, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116709

    Schaerer, D., Hayes, M., Verhamme, A., & Teyssier, R. 2011, A&A, 531, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116709

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Benford, D

    Stern, D., Assef, R. J., Benford, D. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/30

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.06418, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.06418 van Dokkum, P

    Sun, F., Yang, J., Wang, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.06418, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.06418 van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113, 1420, doi: 10.1086/323894

    2025 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    2016, ApJ, 825, 41, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/41

    Vanzella, E., de Barros, S., Vasei, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 825, 41, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/41

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    2015, A&A, 578, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423978

    Verhamme, A., Orlitov´ a, I., Schaerer, D., & Hayes, M. 2015, A&A, 578, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423978

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Leitherer, C., et al

    Wang, B., Heckman, T. M., Leitherer, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab418f

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    A., et al

    Wang, S., Wang, X., Malkan, M. A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.23202, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.23202

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    K., et al

    Watson, D., Christensen, L., Knudsen, K. K., et al. 2015, Nature, 519, 327, doi: 10.1038/nature14164

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., & et al. 2019, AllWISE Source Catalog, IPAC/IRSA, doi: 10.26131/IRSA1

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  50. [58]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75ff

    Yuan, F.-T., Zheng, Z.-Y., Jiang, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75ff

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Yuan, F.-T., Zheng, Z.-Y., Lin, R., Zhu, S., & Rahna, P. T. 2021, ApJL, 923, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4170

    2021 doi

  52. [60]

    2024, ApJL, 974, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7b18

    Zhu, S., Yuan, F.-T., Jiang, C., Zheng, Z.-Y., & Lin, R. 2024, ApJL, 974, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7b18

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    2025, ApJL, 982, L58, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc125

    Zhu, S., Zheng, Z.-Y., Yuan, F.-T., Jiang, C., & Lin, R. 2025, ApJL, 982, L58, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc125

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.