pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.05665 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: no theorem link

A search for optical counterparts in quiescent black hole X-ray transients

I.V. Yanes-Rizo , J. Casares , M.A.P. Torres , V. S. Dhillon , T. R. Marsh , M. Armas Padilla , P. G. Jonker , T. Mu\~noz-Darias
show 2 more authors
S. Navarro Umpi\'errez D. Steeghs
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords black hole X-ray transientsquiescent optical counterpartsastrometryULTRACAM photometryX-ray binariesdynamical massescompanion stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

Four black hole X-ray transient candidates now have their first optical identifications and precise astrometry in quiescence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports ULTRACAM photometry of nine black-hole X-ray transient candidates that previously lacked known quiescent optical counterparts. Combined with DECaPS and Pan-STARRS survey data, the observations yield detections and accurate positions for four systems while placing 3-sigma magnitude limits on five others. These positions supply the essential starting point for dynamical mass measurements of the compact objects. The work also includes outburst photometry for three targets and refined coordinates for an additional source using archival images. From the new magnitudes and colors the authors derive initial constraints on companion spectral types and orbital periods.

Core claim

The central result is the first optical identifications of MAXI J1348-630, SWIFT J1539.2-6227, XTE J1726-476 and XTE J1817-330 together with 3-sigma quiescent magnitude limits for MAXI J0637-430, 4U 1755-338, MAXI J1803-298, XTE J1818-245 and MAXI J1828-249, plus updated astrometry for XTE J1650-500. Photometric colors and magnitudes are used to place preliminary limits on the orbital periods and spectral types of the companion stars.

What carries the argument

ULTRACAM high-speed photometry combined with public survey catalogs to locate optical sources inside the X-ray error circles and measure their magnitudes and colors.

If this is right

  • The new coordinates enable time-resolved spectroscopy to measure radial-velocity curves and obtain dynamical black-hole masses.
  • The magnitude limits and colors supply first estimates of companion star spectral type and orbital period that can be tested with further photometry.
  • Finding charts are provided so that future observers can target these systems with larger telescopes.
  • The refined astrometry for XTE J1650-500 improves its localization for multi-wavelength follow-up.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adding four more systems with quiescent counterparts expands the sample available for testing whether black-hole masses cluster near 10 solar masses.
  • The same survey-plus-targeted-photometry method could be applied to the remaining unidentified transients to increase the total number of dynamically confirmed black holes.
  • Tight magnitude limits on the five undetected sources may indicate either very low accretion rates or large distances that future deeper imaging could test.

Load-bearing premise

The optical sources detected inside the X-ray error circles are the true counterparts and not unrelated field stars.

What would settle it

A spectrum of any of the four detected sources that lacks the emission lines or radial-velocity signature expected for an X-ray binary companion, or proper-motion measurements showing the optical source is not co-moving with the X-ray position.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.05665 by D. Steeghs, I.V. Yanes-Rizo, J. Casares, M.A.P. Torres, M. Armas Padilla, P. G. Jonker, S. Navarro Umpi\'errez, T. Mu\~noz-Darias, T. R. Marsh, V. S. Dhillon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Limiting magnitudes as a function of the seeing cut-off for the X-ray transient SWIFT J1539.2-6227. The red and green dots represent the values obtained for the r and g-band, respectively. The red and green numbers indicate the number of combined frames. The deepest magni￾tude is obtained by selecting images with a seeing up to 1.25 arcsec. ing our observations. Clearly the maximum SNR and depth that can b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Deepest r-band images for the sample of the nine BH candidates. The location of the objects are indicated by red ellipses, taking into account the positional errors reported in the literature (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PSF residual r-band images. Object locations are indicated by red ellipses, except for J1828, which is marked with red tick marks due to its small positional error. The field of view is 10 x 10 arcsec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Best identifications from DECaPS2 images, with each field of view measuring 20 × 20 arcsec. The positions of the objects are marked with red ellipses, accounting for the positional uncertainties reported in the literature (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dynamical mass measurements of compact stars in X-ray transients demand the detection of optical/near infrared counterparts in quiescence. Out of the 73 black-hole candidates in X-ray transients, optical and near-infrared quiescent counterparts have only been identified for 34 objects. We present ULTRACAM photometric observations of nine candidate black hole X-ray transients with no reported counterparts in quiescence, complemented with data from the public surveys DECaPS and Pan-STARRS. In addition, we analyze photometry of three sources (SWIFT J1539.2-6227, XTE J1817-330 and XTE J1818-245) obtained during their discovery outburst. The data provide the first optical identifications and precise astrometry of four targets (MAXI J1348-630, SWIFT J1539.2-6227, XTE J1726-476 and XTE J1817-330) plus $3\sigma$ lower limits to the quiescent optical magnitudes for an additional five (MAXI J0637-430, 4U 1755-338, MAXI J1803-298, XTE J1818-245 and MAXI J1828-249). Of these five, 4U 1755-338 was found to be active during our ULTRACAM observations and we use our images to derive refined astrometric coordinates. We use the photometric magnitudes and colors to place preliminary constraints on the orbital periods and spectral types of the companion stars. Finding charts of all the targets are also provided to facilitate future follow-up studies. Finally, we present updated astrometry for XTE J1650-500 using archival FORS2 images.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents ULTRACAM photometric observations of nine candidate black hole X-ray transients with no previously reported quiescent counterparts, supplemented by public survey data from DECaPS and Pan-STARRS. It claims the first optical identifications and precise astrometry for four targets (MAXI J1348-630, SWIFT J1539.2-6227, XTE J1726-476 and XTE J1817-330), 3σ lower limits to the quiescent optical magnitudes for five additional sources (MAXI J0637-430, 4U 1755-338, MAXI J1803-298, XTE J1818-245 and MAXI J1828-249), analysis of outburst photometry for three sources, refined astrometry for 4U 1755-338, preliminary constraints on orbital periods and spectral types of the companion stars, provision of finding charts, and updated astrometry for XTE J1650-500 from archival FORS2 images.

Significance. If the identifications hold, this work meaningfully expands the sample of black-hole X-ray transients with known quiescent optical counterparts (from 34 to 38), directly enabling future dynamical mass measurements and companion-star studies. The empirical approach—relying on direct imaging, public catalogs, and explicit finding charts—avoids modeling assumptions that could affect the central results. The provision of precise positions and charts is a practical contribution that will support immediate follow-up observations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] A summary table listing the new identifications, 3σ limits, coordinates, and error-circle radii for all nine targets would improve readability and allow quick reference to the key results.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract notes preliminary constraints on orbital periods and spectral types; a brief statement of the method (e.g., color-magnitude comparison or period-luminosity relations) would clarify the basis of these constraints without requiring the reader to consult the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, for the accurate summary of our results, and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the work is viewed as a practical contribution that expands the sample of black-hole X-ray transients with known quiescent optical counterparts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reports direct observational results from ULTRACAM photometry and public survey data (DECaPS, Pan-STARRS), including positional identifications, astrometry, and magnitude limits for quiescent black-hole X-ray transients. No derivations, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the central claims. All results are empirical measurements of positions and fluxes with standard error-circle coincidence checks; the derivation chain is absent and the work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a purely observational report of photometric detections and magnitude limits; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 1047 out tokens · 37714 ms · 2026-05-15T14:36:46.954489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    M., Lewis, F., et al

    Al Yazeedi, A., Russell, D. M., Lewis, F., et al. 2019, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 13188, 1

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    & White, N

    Angelini, L. & White, N. E. 2003, ApJ, 586, L71

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

    Appenzeller, I., Fricke, K., Fürtig, W., et al. 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    C., Bramich, D

    Baglio, M. C., Bramich, D. M., Russell, D. M., et al. 2020, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13454, 1

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    C., Russell, D

    Baglio, M. C., Russell, D. M., Bramich, D., & Lewis, F. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 12491, 1

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    M., Bailyn, C

    Buxton, M. M., Bailyn, C. D., Capelo, H. L., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 130

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, L21

    Carotenuto, F., Corbel, S., & Tzioumis, A. 2022, MNRAS, 517, L21

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    2015, ApJ, 808, 80

    Casares, J. 2015, ApJ, 808, 80

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    2016, ApJ, 822, 99

    Casares, J. 2016, ApJ, 822, 99

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 5195

    Casares, J. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5195

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    & Jonker, P

    Casares, J. & Jonker, P. G. 2014, Space Sci. Rev., 183, 223

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2023

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Casares, J., Torres, M. A. P., & Navarro Umpiérrez, S. 2025, A&A, 700, A29

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    V ., Torres, M

    Casares, J., Yanes-Rizo, I. V ., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 5209

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    J., Kilmartin, P., Gilmore, A., et al

    Castro-Tirado, A. J., Kilmartin, P., Gilmore, A., et al. 2001, IAU Circ., 7707, 3

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Chauhan, J., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Raja, W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, L60

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    P., Tomsick, J

    Corbel, S., Fender, R. P., Tomsick, J. A., Tzioumis, A. K., & Tingay, S. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1272

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    M., Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., et al

    Corral-Santana, J. M., Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A61

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    M., Rodriguez-Gil, P., Torres, M

    Corral-Santana, J. M., Rodriguez-Gil, P., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A225

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    M., Torres, M

    Corral-Santana, J. M., Torres, M. A. P., Shahbaz, T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 1036

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    R., Ivezi´c, Ž., Schlegel, D., et al

    Covey, K. R., Ivezi´c, Ž., Schlegel, D., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 2398

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 2692 D’Avanzo, P., Campana, S., Covino, S., et al

    Dai, X., Kong, L., Bu, Q., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2692 D’Avanzo, P., Campana, S., Covino, S., et al. 2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5559, 1

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al

    Dhillon, V . S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 350

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    S., Marsh, T

    Dhillon, V . S., Marsh, T. R., Stevenson, M. J., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 825

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    2011, PASP, 123, 288

    Dressler, A., Bigelow, B., Hare, T., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 288

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 365

    Fortin, F., Kalsi, A., Chaty, S., García, F., & Simaz-Bunzel, A. 2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 365

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition (Cambridge) Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1 Article number, page 11 of 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa57696-25 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    G., & Tomsick, J

    Gallo, E., Homan, J., Jonker, P. G., & Tomsick, J. A. 2008, ApJ, 683, L51

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Garcia, M. R. & Wilkes, B. J. 2002, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 104, 1

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    1972, ApJ, 178, 281

    Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., et al. 1972, ApJ, 178, 281

    work page 1972

  33. [33]

    A., Prosvetov, A

    Grebenev, S. A., Prosvetov, A. V ., Burenin, R. A., Krivonos, R. A., & Mesch- eryakov, A. V . 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 69 Güver, T. & Özel, F. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2050

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    J., Myers, G., Monard, L

    Hambsch, F. J., Myers, G., Monard, L. A. G., & Patterson, J. 2019, The As- tronomer’s Telegram, 13278, 1

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    A., Hynes, R

    Haswell, C. A., Hynes, R. I., King, A. R., & Schenker, K. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 928

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    Hynes, R. I. 2005, ApJ, 623, 1026

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    K., et al

    Jana, A., Naik, S., Jaisawal, G. K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 3922

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 2633

    John, C., De, K., Lucchini, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 2633

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    G., Kaur, K., Stone, N., & Torres, M

    Jonker, P. G., Kaur, K., Stone, N., & Torres, M. A. P. 2021, ApJ, 921, 131

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Jonker, P. G. & Nelemans, G. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 355

    work page 2004

  41. [41]

    A., et al

    Kaaret, P., Corbel, S., Tomsick, J. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 641, 410

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    1999, Infor- mation Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4777, 1

    Kato, T., Uemura, M., Stubbings, R., Watanabe, T., & Monard, B. 1999, Infor- mation Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4777, 1

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    A., Linares, M., Krimm, H

    Kennea, J. A., Linares, M., Krimm, H. A., et al. 2013, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 5478, 1

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    A., Barthelmy, S

    Krimm, H. A., Barthelmy, S. D., Baumgartner, W., et al. 2008, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 1855, 1

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    A., Kennea, J

    Krimm, H. A., Kennea, J. A., Schady, P., & Evans, P. A. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 1893, 1

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    A., Tomsick, J

    Krimm, H. A., Tomsick, J. A., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 104

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    2013, A&A, 552, A32

    Kuulkers, E., Kouveliotou, C., Belloni, T., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A32

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    D., Predehl, P., et al

    Lamer, G., Schwope, A. D., Predehl, P., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A7

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    X., Huang, Y ., Bu, Q

    Liu, H. X., Huang, Y ., Bu, Q. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 108 López, K. M., Jonker, P. G., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2149

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    2005, The As- tronomer’s Telegram, 628, 1

    Maitra, D., Cobb, B., Bailyn, C., Nelan, J., & Gonzalez, D. 2005, The As- tronomer’s Telegram, 628, 1

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    O., Parmar, A

    Mason, K. O., Parmar, A. N., & White, N. E. 1985, MNRAS, 216, 1033 Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Casares, J., Corral-Santana, J. M., & Shah- baz, T. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2199 Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Cúneo, V . A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, L10

    work page 1985

  52. [52]

    McClintock, J. E. & Remillard, R. A. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, V ol. 39 (Cambridge), 157–213

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    2020, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 13606, 1

    Mereminskiy, I., Semena, A., Pavlinsky, M., et al. 2020, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 13606, 1

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Madej, O. K., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2011, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 3358, 1

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    W., et al

    Mowlavi, N., Rimoldini, L., Evans, D. W., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A44

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5474, 1

    Nakahira, S., Tomida, H., Negoro, H., et al. 2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5474, 1

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13256, 1

    Negoro, H., Miike, K., Nakajima, M., et al. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13256, 1

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    A., McClintock, J

    Orosz, J. A., McClintock, J. E., Remillard, R. A., & Corbel, S. 2004, ApJ, 616, 376

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    Pecaut, M. J. & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5482, 1

    Rau, A., Tanga, M., & Greiner, J. 2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5482, 1

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    2001, IAU Circ., 7707, 1

    Remillard, R. 2001, IAU Circ., 7707, 1

    work page 2001

  62. [62]

    M., Morgan, E

    Remillard, R., Levine, A. M., Morgan, E. H., Markwardt, C. B., & Swank, J. H. 2006, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 714, 1

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    Roberts, M. S. E., Michelson, P. F., Cominsky, L. R., et al. 1996, IAU Circ., 6302, 2

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    P., Dhawan, V ., & Mioduszewski, A

    Rupen, M. P., Dhawan, V ., & Mioduszewski, A. J. 2005, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 589, 1

    work page 2005

  65. [65]

    P., Dhawan, V ., & Mioduszewski, A

    Rupen, M. P., Dhawan, V ., & Mioduszewski, A. J. 2006, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 721, 1

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    M., Maitra, D., Dunn, R

    Russell, D. M., Maitra, D., Dunn, R. J. H., & Fender, R. P. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2311

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    M., Baglio, M

    Saikia, P., Russell, D. M., Baglio, M. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 38

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    M., Baglio, M

    Saikia, P., Russell, D. M., Baglio, M. C., Bramich, D. M., & Lewis, F. 2021, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 14706, 1

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    2007, Ap&SS, 309, 315

    Sala, G., Greiner, J., Bottacini, E., & Haberl, F. 2007, Ap&SS, 309, 315

    work page 2007

  70. [70]

    2002, IAU Circ., 7989, 1

    Sanchez-Fernandez, C., Zurita, C., Casares, J., et al. 2002, IAU Circ., 7989, 1

    work page 2002

  71. [71]

    2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 12447, 1

    Sanna, A., Uttley, P., Altamirano, D., et al. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 12447, 1

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    K., Schlafly, E

    Saydjari, A. K., Schlafly, E. F., Lang, D., et al. 2023, ApJS, 264, 28

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    2021, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 14587, 1

    Serino, M., Negoro, H., Nakajima, M., et al. 2021, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 14587, 1

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    & Kuulkers, E

    Shahbaz, T. & Kuulkers, E. 1998, MNRAS, 295, L1

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 3105

    Soria, R., Ma, R., Tao, L., & Zhang, S.-N. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3105

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191

    work page 1987

  78. [78]

    2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13260, 1

    Strader, J., Aydi, E., Sokolovsky, K., & Shishkovsky, L. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13260, 1

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    E., Shaw, A

    Tetarenko, B. E., Shaw, A. W., Manrow, E. R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3406

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    2020, ApJ, 899, L20

    Tominaga, M., Nakahira, S., Shidatsu, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, L20

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.