Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 65 references

Discontinuous Wealth-Gradient Transition Driving Cooperation

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scaling payoffs by the poorer partner's wealth lets cooperators dominate at high costs via a discontinuous wealth-gradient transition at the cooperator–defector boundary.

desk verdict We only have the abstract for the wealth-gradient cooperation paper; the supplied full text is the wrong manuscript (YBCO CDW), so the discontinuous-transition claim cannot be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.10488 v1 pith:V5IDSZOH submitted 2026-03-11 physics.soc-ph

Hyun Gyu Lee , Hyeong-Chai Jeong , Deok-Sun Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-ph PACS 87.23.Ge02.50.Le89.75.Fb
keywords cooperationwealthscalingspatialgamesdiscontinuoustransitiongradienttemperatureevolutionarygametheorylatticepopulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a lattice population playing a social dilemma in which each interaction's payoff is multiplied by the minimum of the two players' accumulated wealth. That single rule lets frequent cooperators, who become wealthier over time, out-earn defectors even when the cost of cooperation is high enough that defection would normally win. In one dimension the wealth gradient across the cooperator–defector front undergoes a discontinuous jump at a raised critical cost–benefit ratio. Slowing and eventual stalling of that front produce an explosive accumulation of the gradient, which then drives cooperation to dominate below the critical value. The same promotion of cooperation is stronger when the temperature (noise) is higher, so fluctuations help rather than hinder the transition. The result offers a concrete, history-dependent mechanism that can reconcile the observed prevalence of cooperation with the classic incentive to defect.

What carries the argument

Wealth-scaled payoffs (each pairwise payoff multiplied by the poorer player's accumulated wealth) together with the resulting discontinuous transition of the wealth gradient at the cooperator–defector front; the stalled front then amplifies the gradient that favors cooperators.

What would settle it

Replace the min-wealth multiplier by product, average, or max wealth (or by no wealth scaling) and check whether the discontinuous jump in the boundary wealth gradient and the elevated critical cost–benefit ratio both disappear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When interaction payoffs are scaled by the minimum of the participants' accumulated wealth, the critical cost–benefit ratio at which cooperators can invade is elevated; at that elevated threshold the spatial wealth gradient at the one-dimensional cooperator–defector boundary jumps discontinuously, and the consequent slowing and stalling of the boundary generate an explosive wealth gradient that drives global dominance of cooperation below the critical ratio, with the effect strengthened by higher temperature.

Load-bearing premise

That multiplying every interaction payoff by the minimum of the two players' accumulated wealth is a faithful enough model of real-world heterogeneity and of the influence of past choices that the discontinuous transition and temperature-enhanced cooperation are not artifacts of that particular scaling.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2603.10488 proposes a lattice game-theoretic model in which interaction payoffs are scaled by the minimum of the two participants’ accumulated wealth. It claims that this min-wealth scaling elevates the critical cost–benefit ratio, that the wealth gradient at the one-dimensional cooperator–defector boundary undergoes a discontinuous transition at that elevated critical value, that boundary slowing/stalling produces an explosive wealth-gradient buildup that drives cooperation below the critical ratio, and that this promotion of cooperation is stronger at higher temperatures. The body of the supplied manuscript, however, is an unrelated condensed-matter experiment (time-resolved resonant soft X-ray scattering of charge-density-wave melting in YBa2Cu3O6.67, arXiv:2603.10486). No lattice model, payoff matrix, wealth-update rule, temperature definition, simulation protocol, or derivation of a discontinuous wealth-gradient transition appears in the provided full text.

Significance. If the abstract’s claims were substantiated by a correct manuscript—with a well-specified model, finite-size checks, and a clear mechanism for the discontinuous gradient transition and temperature-enhanced cooperation—the work could be a meaningful contribution to evolutionary game theory on structured populations, especially the constructive role of fluctuations. On the material actually supplied, significance cannot be assessed: the scientific content of 2603.10488 is not present.

major comments (2)
  1. Manuscript identity failure: the CACHEABLE full text is the YBCO CDW ultrafast-scattering paper (arXiv:2603.10486), not “Discontinuous Wealth-Gradient Transition Driving Cooperation” (arXiv:2603.10488). Every load-bearing claim in the abstract (min-wealth payoff scaling, elevated critical cost–benefit ratio, discontinuous wealth gradient at the 1D C–D boundary, boundary stalling, temperature-enhanced cooperation) is therefore unsupported by any equation, figure, or method in the document under review. The paper cannot be evaluated until the correct full text is provided.
  2. Abstract-only claims that cannot be checked: without the actual methods, one cannot verify (i) the functional form and update rule for accumulated wealth, (ii) the definition of temperature/noise in strategy updates, (iii) the operational definition of the wealth gradient and of “discontinuous transition,” (iv) finite-size and dimensionality dependence, or (v) robustness to alternative scalings (product, average, max). These are load-bearing for the central claim and are absent from the supplied text.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract alone is clear and well written, but that is insufficient for peer review of a theory/simulation paper in physics.soc-ph.
  2. Paper ID / arXiv number mismatch between the header (2603.10488) and the embedded manuscript (2603.10486) should be corrected at the editorial/production stage before re-review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity assessable: full text is the wrong paper (YBCO CDW, 2603.10486); abstract of 2603.10488 shows only ordinary model-to-result construction.

full rationale

The claimed paper (2603.10488) is available only as its abstract. That abstract postulates a lattice game with payoffs scaled by min(wealth), then reports an elevated critical cost-benefit ratio, a discontinuous wealth-gradient transition at the 1D C–D boundary, boundary stalling, and temperature-enhanced cooperation. This is standard model construction followed by claimed consequences, not a self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations, update rules, critical-ratio derivations, or simulation protocols appear in the supplied text, so no reduction of a 'prediction' to its own inputs can be exhibited. The CACHEABLE full-manuscript block is an unrelated condensed-matter paper on ultrafast CDW melting in YBa2Cu3O6+x (arXiv:2603.10486) and contains none of the game-theoretic content. Consequently no circular step of the wealth-gradient paper can be quoted or verified; the honest finding on available material is score 0 with empty steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review of 2603.10488. Load-bearing modeling choices are inferred from the abstract wording. No free parameters with numeric fits are stated. Invented entities are modeling constructs (wealth-scaled payoffs, wealth gradient at the C–D boundary), not new physical particles. Domain assumptions of lattice evolutionary games are standard; the min-wealth scaling is paper-specific.

free parameters (2)
  • critical cost-benefit ratio (elevated)
    Abstract asserts an elevated critical cost-benefit ratio at which the discontinuous transition occurs; no value or fitting procedure is given in the abstract.
  • temperature / noise level in strategy updates
    Promotion of cooperation is said to be stronger at higher temperatures; the temperature scale and update kernel are not specified in the abstract.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Population is structured on a lattice and strategies update via a local game-theoretic process with a temperature-like noise parameter.
    Standard spatial evolutionary-game setting invoked throughout the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Interaction payoffs are scaled by the minimum of the two participants’ accumulated wealth.
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract; not a theorem, chosen to reflect heterogeneity and past choices.
  • domain assumption Accumulated wealth incorporates the influence of past strategic choices and creates real-world-like heterogeneity.
    Interpretive premise linking the min-wealth rule to empirical motivation (abstract).
  • domain assumption In one dimension a cooperator–defector boundary exists whose motion and wealth gradient control macroscopic dominance.
    Boundary picture is load-bearing for the discontinuous-transition claim.
invented entities (2)
  • Min-wealth payoff scaling
    purpose: Make interaction value depend on the poorer player’s wealth so frequent cooperators can out-earn defectors at high cost.
    Functional form is introduced by the paper; independent empirical validation is not provided in the abstract.
  • Discontinuous wealth-gradient transition at the C–D boundary
    purpose: Explain elevated critical cost-benefit ratio and explosive gradient buildup that stalls invasion and favors cooperation.
    Central reported phenomenon; existence is a result claim, not an external entity with independent measurement outside the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discontinuous Wealth-Gradient Transition Driving Cooperation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5IDSZOH

@misc{pith2026260310488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discontinuous Wealth-Gradient Transition Driving Cooperation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5IDSZOH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.10488}
}
read the original abstract

The universal prevalence of cooperation is puzzling, as defection typically yields higher payoffs than cooperation, motivating searches for hidden pathways to cooperation. Here we study a game-theoretic model on a lattice structured population in which interaction payoffs are scaled by the minimum of participants' accumulated wealth, reflecting real-world heterogeneity and incorporating the influence of past strategic choices. This wealth scaling allows frequent cooperators to surpass defectors in payoffs through their greater wealth even at high cooperation costs where defection would otherwise dominate. At the elevated critical cost-benefit ratio, the wealth gradient at the cooperator-defector boundary in one dimension exhibits a discontinuous transition. We show that slowing and effective stalling of the boundary trigger an explosive buildup of the wealth gradient, driving the dominance of cooperation below the critical ratio. Remarkably, this promotion of cooperation is stronger at higher temperatures, revealing a constructive role of fluctuations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    a sudden increase of stability to photo-excitation for the CDW as a function of correlation length. To further corroborate this two-component interpreta- tion, beyond the specific details of the model adopted, we considered the scattering data collected by the small detector in our experiment. Such detector, while hav- ing lower x-ray counts, can provide ...

  2. [2]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Re- views of Modern Physics��, 457 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature���, 647 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Gr¨ uner, Reviews of modern physics��, 1129 (1988)

    G. Gr¨ uner, Reviews of modern physics��, 1129 (1988)

    1988

  5. [5]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature���, 179 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Castellani, C

    C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and M. Grilli, Physical re- view letters��, 4650 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    Caprara, C

    S. Caprara, C. Di Castro, G. Seibold, and M. Grilli, Phys- ical Review B��, 224511 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, S. Blanco-Canosa, N. Brookes, G. De Luca, A. Frano, D. Hawthorn, F. He, et al., Science���, 821 (2012)

    2012

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Chang, A

    J. Chang, A. Holmes, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, A. Watenphul,et al., Nature Physics�, 871 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Gerber, H

    S. Gerber, H. Jang, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Ya- sumura, D. Bonn, R. Liang, W. Hardy, Z. Islam, A. Mehta,et al., Science���, 949 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Comin and A

    R. Comin and A. Damascelli, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics�, 369 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, O. Ivashko, A. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, M. H¨ ucker, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, U. R¨ utt,et al., Nature Communications�, 11494 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    W.-S. Lee, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Yasumura, L. Nie, A. Maharaj, S. Gerber, Y.-J. Liu, A. Mehta,et al., Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences���, 14645 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    H.-H. Kim, S. Souliou, E. Lefran¸ cois, M. Tortora,et al., Science���, 1040 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    J. Choi, O. Ivashko, E. Blackburn, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, A. Holmes, N. Christensen, M. Huecker, S. Gerber,et al., Nature Communications��, 990 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Vinograd, S

    I. Vinograd, S. Souliou, A.-A. Haghighirad, T. Lac- mann, Y. Caplan, M. Frachet, M. Merz, G. Garbarino, Y. Liu, S. Nakata,et al., Nature Communications��, 3277 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Porter, L

    Z. Porter, L. Shen, R. Plumley, N. G. Burdet, A. N. Petsch, J. Wen, N. C. Drucker, C. Peng, X. M. Chen, A. Fluerasu,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences���, e2412182121 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Arpaia and G

    R. Arpaia and G. Ghiringhelli, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan��, 111005 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, A. Frano, and F. Boschini, Frontiers in Electronic Materials�, 1473324 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Giannetti, M

    C. Giannetti, M. Capone, D. Fausti, M. Fabrizio, F. Parmigiani, and D. Mihailovic, Advances in Physics ��, 58 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    A. Zong, B. R. Nebgen, S.-C. Lin, J. A. Spies, and M. Zuerch, Nature Reviews Materials�, 224 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Zonno, and A. Damascelli, Reviews of Modern Physics��, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. H. Torchinsky, F. Mahmood, A. T. Bollinger, I. Boˇ zovi´ c, and N. Gedik, Nature Materials��, 387 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Hinton, J

    J. Hinton, J. Koralek, Y. Lu, A. Vishwanath, J. Oren- stein, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, and R. Liang, Physical Review B��, 060508 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    G. L. Dakovski, W.-S. Lee, D. G. Hawthorn, N. Garner, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, R. Liang, M. C. Hoffmann, and J. J. Turner, Physical Review B��, 220506 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    F¨ orst, A

    M. F¨ orst, A. Frano, S. Kaiser, R. Mankowsky, C. R. Hunt, J. Turner, G. Dakovski, M. Minitti, J. Robinson, T. Loew,et al., Physical Review B��, 184514 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Bostedt, S

    C. Bostedt, S. Boutet, D. M. Fritz, Z. Huang, H. J. Lee, H. T. Lemke, A. Robert, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, and G. J. Williams, Reviews of Modern Physics ��, 015007 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Lee, A. A. Husain, M. Zhu, G. de la Pe˜ na Munoz, S. X.-L. Sun, Y. I. Joe, A. H. Reid, S. F. Wandel, G. Coslovich,et al., Physical Review B���, 205125 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Lee, A. A. Husain, L. Delacretaz, M. Zhu, G. de la Pe˜ na Munoz, S. X.-L. Sun, Y. I. Joe, A. H. Reid, S. F. Wandel,et al., Science Advances�, eaax3346 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Wandel, F

    S. Wandel, F. Boschini, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Shen, M. X. Na, S. Zohar, Y. Wang, S. B. Welch, M. H. Seaberg, J. D. Koralek,et al., Science���, 860 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    H. Jang, S. Song, T. Kihara, Y. Liu, S.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Park, M. Kim, H.-D. Kim, G. Coslovich, S. Nakata,et al., Science Advances�, eabk0832 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Padma, F

    H. Padma, F. Glerean, S. F. TenHuisen, Z. Shen, 8 H. Wang, L. Xu, J. D. Elliott, C. C. Homes, E. Skoropata, H. Ueda,et al., Nature Materials��, 1584 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Arpaia, S

    R. Arpaia, S. Caprara, R. Fumagalli, G. De Vec- chi, Y. Peng, E. Andersson, D. Betto, G. De Luca, N. Brookes, F. Lombardi,et al., Science���, 906 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Arpaia, L

    R. Arpaia, L. Martinelli, M. M. Sala, S. Caprara, A. Nag, N. B. Brookes, P. Camisa, Q. Li, Q. Gao, X. Zhou,et al., Nature Communications��, 7198 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    See supplementary informations for further details

  28. [36]

    W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, M. Rowen, P. Heimann, M. Holmes, O. Krupin, M. Messerschmidt, S. Moeller, J. Krzywinski, R. Soufli,et al., Review of Scientific In- struments��(2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    W.-S. Lee, Y. Chuang, R. Moore, Y. Zhu, L. Patthey, M. Trigo, D. Lu, P. Kirchmann, O. Krupin, M. Yi,et al., Nature Communications�, 838 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y.-Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Bal- dini, E. Erge¸ cen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, et al., Nature Physics��, 27 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Jang, H.-D

    H. Jang, H.-D. Kim, M. Kim, S. H. Park, S. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, S.-Y. Park, G. Park, S. Kim, H. Hyun,et al., Review of Scientific Instruments��, 083904 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Yusupov, T

    R. Yusupov, T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, S. Brazovskii, P. Kusar, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and D. Mihailovic, Nature Physics�, 681 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Y. D. Chuang, W. S. Lee, Y. F. Kung, A. P. Sorini, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, L. Patthey, M. Trigo, D. H. Lu, P. S. Kirchmann,et al., Physical Review Letters���, 127404 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Beaud, A

    P. Beaud, A. Caviezel, S. Mariager, L. Rettig, G. Ingold, C. Dornes, S. Huang, J. Johnson, M. Radovic, T. Huber, et al., Nature Materials��, 923 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Esposito, M

    V. Esposito, M. Fechner, R. Mankowsky, H. Lemke, M. Chollet, J. M. Glownia, M. Nakamura, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, U. Staub,et al., Physical review letters���, 247601 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Kusar, V

    P. Kusar, V. V. Kabanov, J. Demsar, T. Mertelj, S. Sugai, and D. Mihailovic, Physical Review Letters���, 227001 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Stojchevska, P

    L. Stojchevska, P. Kusar, T. Mertelj, V. Kabanov, Y. Toda, X. Yao, and D. Mihailovic, Physical Review B��, 180507 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Coslovich, C

    G. Coslovich, C. Giannetti, F. Cilento, S. Dal Conte, G. Ferrini, P. Galinetto, M. Greven, H. Eisaki, M. Raichle, R. Liang,et al., Physical Review B��, 064519 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Tomeljak, H

    A. Tomeljak, H. Sch¨ afer, D. St¨ adter, M. Beyer, K. Bil- jakovic, and J. Demsar, Physical review letters���, 066404 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    J. M. Shen, A. Stangel, S. H. Sung, N. Agarwal, G. Ye, C. Nnokwe, L. Zhao, Y. Zhang, R. He, I. El Baggari, et al., Matter (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    Chaix, G

    L. Chaix, G. Ghiringhelli, Y. Peng, M. Hashimoto, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, Y. He, S. Chen, S. Ishida,et al., Nature Physics��, 952 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    da Silva Neto, M

    E. da Silva Neto, M. Minola, B. Yu, W. Tabis, M. Bluschke, D. Unruh, H. Suzuki, Y. Li, G. Yu, D. Betto,et al., Physical Review B��, 161114 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    B. Yu, W. Tabis, I. Bialo, F. Yakhou, N. Brookes, Z. An- derson, Y. Tang, G. Yu, and M. Greven, Physical Review X��, 021059 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    H. Miao, J. Lorenzana, G. Seibold, Y. Peng, A. Amorese, F. Yakhou-Harris, K. Kummer, N. Brookes, R. Konik, V. Thampy,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.00022 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    H. Miao, R. Fumagalli, M. Rossi, J. Lorenzana, G. Sei- bold, F. Yakhou-Harris, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, G. Gu, L. Braicovich,et al., Physical Review X�, 031042 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    J. Li, A. Nag, J. Pelliciari, H. Robarts, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Eisaki, D. Song, H. Ding, S. Johnston,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences���, 16219 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Lee, K.-J

    W.-S. Lee, K.-J. Zhou, M. Hepting, J. Li, A. Nag, A. Wal- ters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Robarts, M. Hashimoto, H. Lu,et al., Nature Physics��, 53 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Minola, R. Sutarto, E. Schierle, M. Bluschke, S. Das, Y. Yang, M. Michiardi, Y. Shao, X. Feng,et al., Nature communications��, 597 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Huang, A

    H. Huang, A. Singh, C. Mou, S. Johnston, A. Kemper, J. van den Brink, P. Chen, T. Lee, J. Okamoto, Y. Chu, et al., Physical Review X��, 041038 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    H. Lu, M. Hashimoto, S.-D. Chen, S. Ishida, D. Song, H. Eisaki, A. Nag, M. Garcia-Fernandez, R. Arpaia, G. Ghiringhelli,et al., Physical Review B���, 155109 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Scott, E

    K. Scott, E. Kisiel, T. J. Boyle, R. Basak, G. Jar- got, S. Das, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Choi, J. Pelliciari,et al., Science Advances�, eadg3710 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Bluschke, N

    M. Bluschke, N. K. Gupta, H. Jang, A. A. Husain, B. Lee, M. Kim, M. Na, B. Dos Remedios, S. Smit, P. Moen, et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ���, e2400727121 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Schmitt, P

    F. Schmitt, P. S. Kirchmann, U. Bovensiepen, R. G. Moore, L. Rettig, M. Krenz, J.-H. Chu, N. Ru, L. Per- fetti, D. Lu,et al., Science , 1649 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    Huber, S

    T. Huber, S. O. Mariager, A. Ferrer, H. Sch¨ afer, J. A. Johnson, S. Gr¨ ubel, A. L¨ ubcke, L. Huber, T. Kubacka, C. Dornes,et al., Physical review letters���, 026401 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    Boschini, E

    F. Boschini, E. da Silva Neto, E. Razzoli, M. Zonno, R. Day, M. Michiardi, M. Schneider, B. Zwartsenberg, P. Nigge,et al., Nature Materials��, 416 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Dal Conte, C

    S. Dal Conte, C. Giannetti, G. Coslovich, F. Cilento, D. Bossini, T. Abebaw, F. Banfi, G. Ferrini, H. Eisaki, M. Greven,et al., Science���, 1600 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Maklar, Y

    J. Maklar, Y. W. Windsor, C. W. Nicholson, M. Pup- pin, P. Walmsley, V. Esposito, M. Porer, J. Rittmann, D. Leuenberger, M. Kubli,et al., Nature communications ��, 2499 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.