Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 33 references

Efficient Scattering Synthesis for Beyond-Diagonal Non-Local RISs Coupled with Passive Load Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a static non-radiating feed network behind a tunable antenna array turns the diagonal load matrix into a full non-diagonal one, yielding near-perfect and superdirective wide-angle reflection at half-wavelength spacing

desk verdict Cascaded co-simulation framework for beyond-diagonal RIS is a useful design recipe, but the headline efficiencies rely on an untested non-radiation assumption and need full-wave validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12815 v1 pith:FLDEEK3I submitted 2026-03-13 physics.app-ph

Sravan K. R. Vuyyuru , Francisco S. Cuesta , Viktar S. Asadchy , Sergei A. Tretyakov , Do-Hoon Kwon This is my paper
classification physics.app-ph
keywords beyond-diagonalRISreconfigurableintelligentsurfaceanomalousreflectionnon-localloadsmultiportnetworksuperdirectivityarrayscatteringsynthesisco-simulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the efficiency bottleneck of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces—high-angle anomalous reflection—can be solved without packing elements closer than half a wavelength. The conventional approach uses a diagonal load impedance matrix, where each element is tuned independently, and strong non-local coupling requires subwavelength element spacing. The proposed architecture terminates the radiating array in a static, non-radiating feed network that connects the element ports to additional tunable loads, effectively replacing the diagonal load matrix with a non-diagonal one. Using a co-simulation workflow that combines full-wave antenna characterization with circuit-level modeling of the feed network, the paper reports nominally perfect reflection efficiency for a periodic supercell and 162–169% efficiencies (relative to an ideal finite-aperture reflector) for a 21-element half-wavelength-spaced array. If these results hold, high-performance non-local RISs could be built at conventional element densities using printed-circuit feed networks.

What carries the argument

The key object is the cascaded multiport network identity that reduces a radiating array plus a static non-radiating feed network plus N tunable loads to an equivalent M-port load matrix Z_O = Z_OO − Z_OI (Z_L + Z_II)^−1 Z_IO. This identity converts conventional diagonal-load synthesis into a non-diagonal matrix optimization, effectively creating a 'virtual array' of additional controllable ports without requiring subwavelength element spacing.

What would settle it

Simulate or measure the complete physical structure—radiating array plus the actual feed network—as one full-wave model, and compare the bistatic scattering patterns against the paper's predictions (e.g., Fig. 9 and Table II). If the efficiency relative to the ideal reflector falls well below the predicted 162–169%, or if specular reflection lobes reappear, the non-radiating and circuit-fidelity assumption on the feed network does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is that the scattering synthesis of a non-local RIS can be recast exactly as a cascaded multiport network: an M-port radiating array is terminated by a static feed network, which is in turn terminated by N isolated tunable loads. Eliminating the intermediate network yields an equivalent full M-port load impedance matrix Z_O = Z_OO − Z_OI (Z_L + Z_II)^−1 Z_IO, so the diagonal load matrix of conventional RIS design becomes a dense matrix with extra degrees of freedom. With this extra freedom, the paper optimizes reactive loads in a three-patch periodic supercell to reach nominally perfect reflection efficiency at a 70° deflection—where the best diagonal non-local design reac

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis rests on the premise that the feed network beneath the ground plane is non-radiating and is accurately characterized by circuit-level simulation, so the electromagnetic response of the radiating array can be captured independently of it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-efficiency wide-angle anomalous reflection is achievable at half-wavelength element spacing, removing the need for deep subwavelength structuring.
  • For a fixed efficiency target, the required element density can be significantly reduced, easing fabrication, scalability, and calibration.
  • The co-simulation workflow (full-wave for the radiating array, circuit-level for the feed network) makes large-scale non-diagonal RIS design computationally tractable.
  • Superdirective scattering, previously associated with subwavelength current control, can be obtained in conventional half-wavelength-spaced arrays through optimized cascaded load networks.
  • The formulation generalizes to arbitrary radiating geometries and polarizations, since only the array's impedance matrix, open-circuit voltages, and vector effective heights are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cascaded-network identity suggests the static feed network could itself be made reconfigurable, trading fixed complexity for dynamic tuning; the paper leaves this direction unexplored.
  • Because the feed network sits behind the ground plane, the architecture should be robust to environmental perturbations; a natural test is whether measured prototypes preserve the predicted efficiencies under incidence-angle and frequency variations.
  • The 162–169% efficiencies are defined relative to an ideal finite-aperture reflector benchmark; comparing against a rigorous power-conservation bound for finite apertures would clarify how much of the reported gain is inherent vs. benchmark-dependent.
  • If the feed network radiates or exhibits loss, the efficiency gains will erode; a full-wave simulation of the complete array plus feed cascade—not reported in the paper—would be the decisive check of the non-radiating assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper presents a hybrid co-simulation framework for designing beyond-diagonal RISs (BD-RISs). A radiating patch array, characterized once by full-wave CST simulation, is terminated by a static feed network beneath the ground plane which is modeled only at the circuit level in ADS; the feed network is in turn terminated by tunable diagonal reactive loads. The cascade is reduced to an equivalent M-port load matrix Z_O (Eq. (6)), and the scattered field is expressed algebraically via the array's open-circuit parameters and effective heights (Eqs. (14)-(15)). Optimizing the load reactances yields two prototype designs: an infinite periodic three-patch supercell (0.3547\lambda spacing, five load ports) reported to achieve 'nominally perfect' anomalous reflection at \theta_r = 70° (Fig. 7(d)), and a finite 21-element \lambda/2-spaced array (41 load ports) reported to achieve superdirective efficiencies of 162-169% relative to an ideal finite-aperture reflector (Table II). The central claim is that non-local guided-wave coupling through the feed network gives significantly higher reflection efficiencies than diagonal load matrices at the same element density, without deep-subwavelength structuring.

Significance. If the reported efficiencies were established, this would be a valuable contribution: a general, algebraically efficient design path for BD-RISs that accounts for both above-ground EM mutual coupling (via full-wave array characterization) and guided-wave coupling beneath the ground plane (via circuit modeling). The block-matrix cascade derivations (Eqs. (1)-(13)) are internally consistent and follow standard multiport network theory; the framework generalizes the authors' earlier diagonal-load synthesis [7], [8], and the diagonal-versus-beyond-diagonal comparison is meaningful because both are evaluated within the same model. The finite-array results in Table II, if confirmed, would be significant, as they suggest that superdirective anomalous reflection is attainable at half-wavelength spacing. The paper is explicit about its premise in §II-A and uses an analytical benchmark (Eq. (16)), which is good practice. However, the two central performance claims rest on (i) the unverified assumption that the beneath-ground feed network is non-radiating and accurately captured by ADS, and (ii) a periodic 'efficiency' that is defined as an amplitude ratio rather than a power ratio. The abstr

major comments (3)
  1. [§II-A, §III-A/B, Table II] The premise that the beneath-ground feed network is non-radiating and accurately characterized by circuit simulation (stated in §II-A) is never tested. All reported efficiencies (100% periodic; 162-169% finite, Table II) are computed by cascading a CST model of the radiating array with an ADS model of the feed network through Eq. (6). The physical feed layout in Fig. 7(c) contains microstrip cross junctions, bends, open sections, and vias through the ground plane—the structures most likely to radiate or couple parasitically. No full-wave simulation of the complete array+feed cascade, of the feed layer alone, or any measurement is reported. This is load-bearing: if the feed network radiates or its ADS model is inaccurate, Z_O in Eq. (6) and all subsequent efficiency values do not describe the physical structure. Please add a full-wave verification of the complete loaded structure (or at l
  2. [§III-A, Eq. (14), Fig. 7(d)] The periodic 'efficiency' is defined in the text as the ratio of the reflected Bloch harmonic amplitude to the incident-wave amplitude, i.e., an amplitude-conversion ratio, not a power efficiency. For \theta_i = 0° and \theta_r = 70°, the power flux normal to the surface scales as |E|² cos \theta_r; an amplitude ratio of unity therefore corresponds to a power efficiency of only cos 70° ≈ 34%, whereas a genuinely 100%-power-efficient reflector would require |E_{+1}|/|E_i| = 1/√cos 70° ≈ 1.71. The 'nominally perfect reflection efficiency' in Fig. 7(d) and the abstract is thus overstated, and comparing these values with the power-efficiency bound of Ref. [33] mixes two different metrics. Note that Eq. (17) for the finite array is correctly power-normalized through the r_n factor in Eq. (16), so the two examples use inconsistent efficiency definitions. Please define and report a consistent p
  3. [§III-B, Table II] The finite-array example that produces the headline 162-169% efficiencies is under-specified. The '62-port non-radiating feed network' is described in a single sentence, with no schematic, physical layout, port/load arrangement, or transmission-line parameters (in contrast to the periodic case, Fig. 7(b)-(c)). The optimized reactive load values are also not reported for either example. Consequently, the Table II results cannot be reproduced or independently checked even within the same hybrid model. Please specify the finite feed-network topology and either tabulate the optimized Z_L or provide a data-availability statement.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§II-B] The load voltage and current vectors V_L and I_L are written with M components, but the load network has N ports (Z_L ∈ C^{N×N}); they should have N components.
  2. [§II-B] Typo: 'mulitport' should be 'multiport'.
  3. [Table I] The column 'Total elements (N)' uses N for the number of patches, which is M in the formulation in §II; N already denotes the number of load ports. Please rename to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'numerically validated' overstates the evidence: the loaded response is computed algebraically from the hybrid model, and only the unloaded array is full-wave simulated. Recommend rewording or adding full-wave validation of the loaded structure.
  5. [§III] The model is entirely lossless (lossless substrate, ideal reactive loads, PEC conductors). Realistic substrate/conductor loss and finite varactor Q will reduce the reported efficiencies; a loss-budget or sensitivity estimate would help position the results.
  6. [Table II] The beam-pointing error (BPE) is discussed in the text but not quantified; adding a BPE column would strengthen the comparison.
  7. [§III-B, Eq. (17)] For the superdirective results (ζ > 1), a power-balance check (e.g., total scattered power versus the incident power available to the aperture) or reported directivity would confirm that the enhanced peak power density is consistent with passive, lossless scattering.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BD-RIS results follow from a self-contained multiport derivation using independently characterized EM and circuit parameters; the main caveat is an untested modeling assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The load-bearing derivation is self-contained. Equation (6) is the standard Schur-complement expression for the equivalent load matrix seen by the array; Eqs. (10), (12), and (13) follow from the same multiport algebra; Eqs. (14) and (15) combine independently obtained full-wave quantities (Z_A, V_oc^A, h^A) with the circuit-level Z_F. The reported efficiencies in Table II and the 'nominally perfect reflection efficiency' for the periodic case are values of the objective function in Eqs. (14)/(17) evaluated after optimizing the reactive loads Z_L. That is a design-synthesis result, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Prior-work self-citations [7], [8], [11] are used for the underlying scattering-synthesis framework and for comparison baselines, but the BD-RIS extension is derived in the paper rather than imported from those citations; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The most serious limitation is the explicit assumption in Section II-A that the feed network is 'non-radiating (i.e., no radiation leakage or unwanted EM coupling) and accurately characterized by circuit simulation'; this is never checked by full-wave simulation of the complete array-plus-feed cascade or by measurement. That is a validation gap and a correctness risk, but it is a stated modeling premise, not a circularity in the derivation chain. Accordingly, no circular step is identified and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities such as particles or forces. The 'non-radiating tunable load network' is an engineering structure with measurable ports and is therefore not an unexplained invented entity. The free parameters are the optimized load impedances and the partly unspecified feed-network geometry. The key ad hoc premise is that the feed network is non-radiating and exactly captured by circuit-level simulation.

free parameters (2)
  • Reactive load impedances Z_L,n (N=5 for the periodic supercell; N=41 for the finite array) = not reported
    These are the optimization variables in the MATLAB fmincon runs. All reported efficiencies (Table II) are evaluated at these fitted values, making them the central fitted parameters of the paper.
  • Feed network microstrip geometry (segment lengths, widths, cross-junction model) = not fully specified
    The ADS transmission-line model in Fig. 7(b) is shown schematically, but exact dimensions and junction parameters needed to reproduce ZF are not given in the text.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The feed network beneath the ground plane is non-radiating and accurately characterized by circuit-level simulation
    Stated in Section II-A ('Provided that the feed network is non-radiating ... and accurately characterized by circuit simulation'). The entire co-simulation decomposition relies on this premise, and no full-wave or measured verification of the complete array+feed structure is provided.
  • domain assumption The M-port antenna array is fully characterized by ZA, V_A_oc, and hA extracted from Tx/Rx full-wave simulations, with linear superposition of structural and port-current scattering
    Used in Sections II-B/II-C and Eqs. (14)-(15). This is standard antenna-network theory, but it requires the loads not to alter the antenna radiation mechanism and requires linearity.
  • standard math The periodic 3-patch supercell with Dx=λ/sinθr supports exactly three propagating Bloch harmonics, all higher orders being evanescent
    Invoked in Section III-A to define the periodic reflection efficiency; follows from the grating equation and Bloch theory.
  • domain assumption The physical-optics expression (16) with r_n=sqrt(cosθi/cosθr) is a valid benchmark for the ideal finite anomalous reflector
    Used as the denominator in the efficiency definition (17). For finite and truncated apertures this expression is approximate, which directly affects the superdirectivity values >100% in Table II.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient Scattering Synthesis for Beyond-Diagonal Non-Local RISs Coupled with Passive Load Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FLDEEK3I

@misc{pith2026260312815,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient Scattering Synthesis for Beyond-Diagonal Non-Local RISs Coupled with Passive Load Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FLDEEK3I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12815}
}
read the original abstract

Realizing advanced functionalities with high efficiencies via reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) and reflectarrays requires configurations with strong electromagnetic non-local responses. The traditional approach to achieving strong non-locality has relied on modeling and synthesizing RISs with diagonal load impedance matrices composed of highly dense subwavelength structuring of arrays. In such designs, non-locality is not directly tunable, thereby limiting design flexibility and operational efficiency. This work proposes a rigorous co-simulation-based design and optimization framework for beyond-diagonal RISs with directly controllable non-locality. The co-simulation approach is based on non-local load and coupling networks, integrating electromagnetic antenna characterization with circuit-level modeling of cascaded load networks. The method benefits from additional degrees of freedom by generalizing the conventional diagonal load impedance matrix to a non-diagonal form through a non-local coupling network model. Wide-angle anomalous reflectors based on finite linear and infinite periodic arrays are designed and numerically validated, demonstrating that the proposed non-local loads embedded in realistic cascaded load networks with associated circuitry achieve significantly higher reflection efficiencies than diagonal load matrices at the given element density. Alternatively, for a fixed efficiency target, the required element density can be significantly reduced for efficient synthesis of beyond-diagonal RIS without compromising the performance of wave manipulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12815 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) 3D schematic of the multilayer BD-RIS structure composed of loaded radiating elements, illustrating plane-wave incidence at angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Conceptual cascaded multiport network representation of the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of a cascaded multiport network formed by interconnecting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the composite load network (the feed network and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representing the interaction of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Equivalent configuration in which the M-element array is terminated by a load network characterized by the impedance matrix ZOO for determin￾ing the structural scattering term for the equivalent N-element array. the array when the feed network is terminated in N open￾c…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Periodic RIS with a three-patch supercell illustrating anomalous reflection from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Top view of the 21-element linear array. (b) Side view with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of 1-D (ϕ = 0) scattering cross section (SCS) patterns for (a) 55◦, (b) 60◦, (c) 65◦, (d) 70◦ designs of the linear anomalous reflector with a λ/2 element spacing in the xz-plane, expressed in dB after normalization. “Analytical” (solid black curve) denote…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [7]

    Efficient synthesis of large finite patch arrays for scanning wide-angle anomalous reflectors,

    S. K. R. Vuyyuru, R. Valkonen, S. A. Tretyakov, and D.-H. Kwon, “Efficient synthesis of large finite patch arrays for scanning wide-angle anomalous reflectors,”IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–87, Feb. 2025

    2025

  2. [8]

    Efficient anomalous reflector design using array antenna scattering synthesis,

    S. K. R. Vuyyuru, R. Valkonen, D.-H. Kwon, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Efficient anomalous reflector design using array antenna scattering synthesis,”IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1711–1715, Jul. 2023

    2023

  3. [33]

    Elim- inating scattering loss in anomalously reflecting optical metasurfaces,

    V . S. Asadchy, A. Wickberg, A. D ´ıaz-Rubio, and M. Wegener, “Elim- inating scattering loss in anomalously reflecting optical metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1264–1270, Apr. 2017

    2017

  4. [1]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, Nov. 2020

    2020

  5. [2]

    Reflectarrays and metasurface reflectors as diffraction gratings: A tutorial,

    F. Liu, D.-H. Kwon, and S. Tretyakov, “Reflectarrays and metasurface reflectors as diffraction gratings: A tutorial,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 21–32, Jun. 2023

    2023

  6. [3]

    Extreme beam-forming with impedance metasurfaces featuring embedded sources and auxiliary surface wave optimization,

    G. Xu, V . G. Ataloglou, S. V . Hum, and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Extreme beam-forming with impedance metasurfaces featuring embedded sources and auxiliary surface wave optimization,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 28 670–28 684, Mar. 2022

    2022

  7. [4]

    Non-local reconfig- urable sparse metasurface: Efficient near-field and far-field wavefront manipulations,

    V . Popov, B. Ratni, S. N. Burokur, and F. Boust, “Non-local reconfig- urable sparse metasurface: Efficient near-field and far-field wavefront manipulations,”Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 2001316, Feb. 2021

    2021

  8. [5]

    All-angle scanning perfect anomalous reflection by using passive aperiodic gratings,

    Y . Li, X. Ma, X. Wang, G. Ptitcyn, M. Movahediqomi, and S. A. Tretyakov, “All-angle scanning perfect anomalous reflection by using passive aperiodic gratings,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 877–889, Jan. 2024

    2024

Show all 33 references
  1. [6]

    Modeling RIS from electromagnetic principles to communication systems—part I: Synthesis and characterization of a scalable anomalous reflector,

    S. K. R. Vuyyuru, L. Hao, M. Rupp, S. A. Tretyakov, and R. Valko- nen, “Modeling RIS from electromagnetic principles to communication systems—part I: Synthesis and characterization of a scalable anomalous reflector,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1743–1755, ...

    2025

  2. [9]

    Reconfigurable su- perdirective and superabsorptive aperiodic metasurfaces,

    Y . Li, X. Ma, X. Wang, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Reconfigurable su- perdirective and superabsorptive aperiodic metasurfaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07608, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    All-angle scanning leaky-wave antennas and surface-wave routing by reconfigurable meta- surfaces,

    Y . Li, X. Ma, V . Asadchy, and S. A. Tretyakov, “All-angle scanning leaky-wave antennas and surface-wave routing by reconfigurable meta- surfaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14954, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Design and analysis of reconfigurable patch arrays for angle-of-arrival sensing and perfect anomalous reflection,

    M. Movahediqomi, S. K. R. Vuyyuru, G. Ptitcyn, R. Valkonen, V . S. Asadchy, D.-H. Kwon, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Design and analysis of reconfigurable patch arrays for angle-of-arrival sensing and perfect anomalous reflection,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 423...

    2026

  5. [12]

    Lossless scalar metasurfaces for anomalous reflection based on efficient surface field optimization,

    D.-H. Kwon, “Lossless scalar metasurfaces for anomalous reflection based on efficient surface field optimization,”IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1149–1152, Jul. 2018

    2018

  6. [13]

    From the generalized reflection law to the realization of perfect anomalous reflectors,

    A. D ´ıaz-Rubio, V . S. Asadchy, A. Elsakka, and S. A. Tretyakov, “From the generalized reflection law to the realization of perfect anomalous reflectors,”Sci. Adv., vol. 3, no. 8, p. e1602714, Aug. 2017

    2017

  7. [14]

    A design framework for reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces enabling full-space beamforming using auxiliary surface waves,

    T. Qiu and G. V . Eleftheriades, “A design framework for reconfigurable intelligent metasurfaces enabling full-space beamforming using auxiliary surface waves,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 51 969–51 977, Mar. 2025

    2025

  8. [15]

    Macroscopic modeling of anoma- lously reflecting metasurfaces: Angular response and far-field scatter- ing,

    A. D ´ıaz-Rubio and S. A. Tretyakov, “Macroscopic modeling of anoma- lously reflecting metasurfaces: Angular response and far-field scatter- ing,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6560–6571, Oct. 2021

    2021

  9. [16]

    Network-based design of reactive beamforming metasurfaces,

    M. Almunif, F. Alsolamy, and A. Grbic, “Network-based design of reactive beamforming metasurfaces,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 5970–5980, Aug. 2025

    2025

  10. [17]

    Metagratings for efficient wavefront manipula- tion,

    Y . Ra’di and A. Al `u, “Metagratings for efficient wavefront manipula- tion,”IEEE Photon. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Feb. 2022

    2022

  11. [18]

    Constructing the near field and far field with reactive metagratings: Study on the degrees of freedom,

    V . Popov, F. Boust, and S. N. Burokur, “Constructing the near field and far field with reactive metagratings: Study on the degrees of freedom,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, Feb. 2019, Art. No. 024074

    2019

  12. [19]

    Experimental demon- stration and in-depth investigation of analytically designed anomalous reflection metagratings,

    O. Rabinovich, I. Kaplon, J. Reis, and A. Epstein, “Experimental demon- stration and in-depth investigation of analytically designed anomalous reflection metagratings,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, p. 125101, Mar. 2019

    2019

  13. [20]

    Multi- functional passive metacrystals for enhancing wireless communications,

    M. M. Asgari, P. B. Catrysse, H. Wang, S. Fan, and V . Asadchy, “Multi- functional passive metacrystals for enhancing wireless communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05699, 2024. 11

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Modeling and architecture design of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces using scattering parameter network analysis,

    S. Shen, B. Clerckx, and R. Murch, “Modeling and architecture design of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces using scattering parameter network analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1229–1243, Feb. 2022

    2022

  15. [22]

    Beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From transmitting and reflecting modes to single-, group-, and fully-connected architectures,

    H. Li, S. Shen, and B. Clerckx, “Beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From transmitting and reflecting modes to single-, group-, and fully-connected architectures,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2311–2324, Apr. 2023

    2023

  16. [23]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces 2.0: Beyond diagonal phase shift matrices,

    H. Li, S. Shen, M. Nerini, and B. Clerckx, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces 2.0: Beyond diagonal phase shift matrices,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 102–108, Mar. 2024

    2024

  17. [24]

    A tutorial on beyond- diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Modeling, architectures, system design and optimization, and applications,

    H. Li, M. Nerini, S. Shen, and B. Clerckx, “A tutorial on beyond- diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Modeling, architectures, system design and optimization, and applications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 28, pp. 4086–4126, Jan. 2026

    2026

  18. [25]

    Beyond diag- onal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with mutual coupling: Modeling and optimization,

    H. Li, S. Shen, M. Nerini, M. Di Renzo, and B. Clerckx, “Beyond diag- onal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with mutual coupling: Modeling and optimization,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 937–941, Apr. 2024

    2024

  19. [26]

    A physics-compliant diagonal representation for wireless channels parametrized by beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    P. del Hougne, “A physics-compliant diagonal representation for wireless channels parametrized by beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5871– 5884, Jul. 2025

    2025

  20. [27]

    Beyond-diagonal RIS prototype and performance evaluation,

    J. Tapie, M. Nerini, B. Clerckx, and P. del Hougne, “Beyond-diagonal RIS prototype and performance evaluation,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1–5, 2026

    2026

  21. [28]

    A hybrid transmitting and reflecting beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surface with independent beam control and power splitting,

    Z. Ming, S. Shen, J. Rao, Z. Li, J. Zhang, C.-Y . Chiu, and R. Murch, “A hybrid transmitting and reflecting beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surface with independent beam control and power splitting,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 10 865–10 ...

    2025

  22. [29]

    Energy efficiency optimization in ris-aided wireless networks: Active versus nearly-passive ris with global reflection constraints,

    R. K. Fotock, A. Zappone, and M. D. Renzo, “Energy efficiency optimization in ris-aided wireless networks: Active versus nearly-passive ris with global reflection constraints,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 257–272, Jan. 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    Retrodirective arrays for wireless communi- cations,

    R. Miyamoto and T. Itoh, “Retrodirective arrays for wireless communi- cations,”IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–79, Mar. 2002

    2002

  24. [31]

    A retrodirective microstrip antenna array,

    S.-J. Chung and K. Chang, “A retrodirective microstrip antenna array,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1802–1809, Dec. 1998

    1998

  25. [32]

    Effective heights for radiation, reception, and scattering characterization of antennas and arrays: Expanded defi- nitions using different termination conditions

    J.-H. Kim and D.-H. Kwon, “Effective heights for radiation, reception, and scattering characterization of antennas and arrays: Expanded defi- nitions using different termination conditions.”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 2025, Early Access

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.