Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 39 references

The long-term accretion luminosity of V4641 Sgr through binary evolution simulations: implications for its ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Binary evolution shows V4641 Sgr’s long-term accretion power is high enough to drive its PeV gamma rays.

desk verdict Promising MESA-based fix for the V4641 Sgr UHE energy crisis, but we only have the abstract and the load-bearing step (evolutionary L_X as present-day particle power) is not yet secured. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.16714 v2 pith:FBMIATK7 submitted 2026-03-17 astro-ph.HE

Ruo-Yu Liu , Yong Shao , Yu-Dong Nie This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords V4641Sgrblack-holeX-raybinaryultrahigh-energygammaraysevolutionMESAaccretionluminosityPeVacceleratormasstransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

V4641 Sgr is a black-hole X-ray binary now linked to ultrahigh-energy gamma rays up to about 0.8 PeV. Explaining that emission needs a time-averaged particle power much larger than the X-ray luminosity averaged over recent decades, which is usually taken as a stand-in for accretion power—an apparent energy crisis. Detailed MESA binary-evolution calculations constrained by the observed system parameters show that every track that reaches the present state passes through a long, slow mass-transfer phase whose intrinsic time-averaged X-ray luminosity is of order 10^38 erg/s. That intrinsic power sits well above the multi-decade observed average and can supply the energy required for the ultrahigh-energy emission, readily in leptonic models and marginally in hadronic ones, supporting the source as a Galactic PeV accelerator.

What carries the argument

An extensive grid of MESA binary-evolution tracks constrained by the observed system parameters of V4641 Sgr; the load-bearing result is that every matching track shares a long-lasting slow mass-transfer phase with high time-averaged intrinsic accretion luminosity.

What would settle it

A measurement or independent estimate of the true long-term mass-transfer or accretion rate in V4641 Sgr (for example via reprocessed emission, orbital-period change, or multiwavelength continuum) that places the time-averaged accretion luminosity well below ~10^38 erg/s would undermine the resolution of the energy crisis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Across an extensive MESA evolutionary grid, every track that matches the present parameters of V4641 Sgr experiences a long-lasting slow mass-transfer phase whose time-averaged intrinsic X-ray luminosity is of order L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s—far above the observed multi-decade average—thereby furnishing enough accretion power to resolve the energy crisis for the associated ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission.

Load-bearing premise

That the high time-averaged intrinsic X-ray luminosity from the simulated mass-transfer phase is a fair proxy for the non-thermal particle power available to drive the ultrahigh-energy emission, with the lower multi-decade observed average explained by an extended obscuring or reprocessing envelope.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The multi-decade X-ray average is not a reliable proxy for the long-term accretion power available to accelerate particles in V4641 Sgr.
  • Leptonic models of the ultrahigh-energy emission become energetically comfortable; hadronic models become at least marginally viable.
  • V4641 Sgr can be treated as a concrete Galactic PeV particle accelerator powered by binary mass transfer rather than by a short-lived outburst.
  • Similar binary-evolution checks may be needed for other microquasars or black-hole X-ray binaries linked to very-high-energy or ultrahigh-energy gamma rays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the obscuring envelope is the main reason the observed X-ray average is low, multiwavelength continuum and line diagnostics of that envelope should correlate with the duty cycle of the slow mass-transfer phase.
  • Other black-hole X-ray binaries with known orbital and component masses may hide similarly high time-averaged accretion power once full evolutionary tracks are run.
  • A joint leptonic–hadronic modeling campaign that uses L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s as the budget floor would test whether the same source can satisfy both spectral and morphological ultrahigh-energy constraints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that the apparent energy crisis for the LHAASO/HAWC ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission of V4641 Sgr (spectrum to ~0.8 PeV) is resolved by binary-evolution modeling. Using MESA tracks constrained by the system’s observed parameters, the authors report that every track matching the present-day system passes through a long-lasting slow mass-transfer phase whose time-averaged intrinsic X-ray luminosity is of order L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s—far above the multi-decade observed X-ray average. They interpret the discrepancy as consistent with an extended obscuring/reprocessing envelope or outflow, and conclude that the inferred intrinsic accretion power readily powers a leptonic UHE model and is marginally adequate for a hadronic model, supporting V4641 Sgr as a Galactic PeVatron.

Significance. If the MESA result and the accretion-to-particle-power mapping hold, the work would remove a major energetic objection to associating the extended UHE emission with this BHXRB and would strengthen the case for microquasars as Galactic PeV accelerators. The approach of using an observationally constrained evolutionary grid rather than the recent X-ray light curve as the accretion-power proxy is a useful methodological contribution for other systems with suspected long-term obscuration. The abstract’s claim that the result is robust across an extensive grid is, in principle, falsifiable and therefore scientifically valuable if documented with clear selection criteria and published tracks.

major comments (3)
  1. The abstract’s central step equates the evolutionary-timescale average intrinsic L_X (~10^38 erg/s) with the non-thermal particle power available to produce the presently observed UHE spectrum. That identification requires (i) that a sufficient fraction of the long-term accretion power is converted into non-thermal particles on the same timescales that set the UHE energy budget, and (ii) that the multi-decade low observed X-ray luminosity reflects obscuration/reprocessing rather than a true drop in accretion rate. The abstract only cites ‘earlier suggestions’ of an envelope/outflow; it does not demonstrate that the system is currently accreting near the MESA average. If the present-day intrinsic accretion rate is substantially lower, the evolutionary average does not power the emission we detect, and the energy crisis remains. This proxy assumption is load-bearing and needs explicit just
  2. The claim that ‘all tracks that match the current system parameters’ share L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s is the paper’s main result, but the abstract alone does not define the matching criteria, the initial-condition grid, the mass-transfer and wind prescriptions, or how L_X is computed from the mass-transfer rate (efficiency, beaming, duty cycle). Without those details, the robustness of the ‘all matching tracks’ statement cannot be assessed, nor can free parameters in the evolutionary setup be distinguished from genuine predictions. The manuscript must document the selection cuts, the size of the matching subset, and the distribution of time-averaged L_X (not only the order-of-magnitude scale).
  3. The abstract states that the inferred power is ‘readily’ sufficient for the leptonic model and ‘marginally consistent’ with the hadronic model. The UHE energy budget, the required non-thermal power, and the assumed radiative efficiencies for both models must be stated quantitatively (including the integration timescale for the extended emission) so that ‘marginal’ can be evaluated. Without that comparison, the resolution of the energy crisis for the hadronic channel remains uncheckable.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract uses both ‘long-term observed X-ray luminosity’ and ‘observed luminosity average over the last few decades’; a single clear definition of the observational baseline (band, duty cycle, upper limits vs detections) would help readers compare to the MESA average.
  2. Clarify whether L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s is bolometric accretion luminosity, 0.1–100 keV X-ray luminosity, or a mass-transfer rate converted with a fixed efficiency; the distinction matters for the particle-power budget.
  3. The phrase ‘over evolutionary timescales of order L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s’ is slightly awkward; rephrase to separate the timescale from the luminosity value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MESA tracks constrained by external system parameters independently predict high long-term L_X, then compared to an externally derived UHE energy budget.

full rationale

From the abstract, the load-bearing chain is: (i) LHAASO/HAWC UHE spectrum implies a high required time-averaged non-thermal power that exceeds the multi-decade observed X-ray average (external observational inputs); (ii) MESA binary-evolution simulations are constrained by known system parameters inferred from observation (masses, orbital period, etc.—also external); (iii) every track that matches those current parameters passes through a long-lasting slow mass-transfer phase with evolutionary-timescale average L_X ~ 10^38 erg/s; (iv) that intrinsic power is then compared to the UHE requirement and found sufficient (leptonic) or marginally so (hadronic). Step (iii) is a genuine model output, not forced by construction from the UHE spectrum or from a fit to the observed X-ray light curve. The appeal to “earlier suggestions” of an obscuring/reprocessing envelope is used only to reconcile the high intrinsic L_X with the low observed multi-decade average; it is not a self-citation uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives, nor does it redefine the MESA result. Whether the evolutionary-timescale average is a valid proxy for the particle power available to the presently observed UHE emission is a physical-assumption / correctness question, not a circularity of definition, fit, or self-citation. No equation or selection criterion in the provided abstract reduces the claimed L_X prediction to the UHE energy budget by construction. Score 1 only for the residual (unproven from the abstract alone) possibility that track selection could have been informed by the required power; nothing in the text exhibits that reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review of 2603.16714. Free parameters and invented entities cannot be exhaustively listed without the methods and results sections. The load-bearing domain assumptions visible in the abstract are listed; standard MESA/stellar physics is treated as domain assumption rather than ad hoc invention. No new particle or force is introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Time-averaged intrinsic L_X scale (~10^38 erg/s)
    Reported as the order-of-magnitude outcome of the evolutionary grid; without the paper we cannot tell how much of this scale is fixed by observed system parameters versus choices of mass-transfer efficiency, wind mass loss, or averaging window.
  • Evolutionary-grid initial conditions and selection cuts for 'matching' tracks
    Abstract states an extensive grid constrained by known system parameters; the precise priors and acceptance criteria are free modeling choices that determine which tracks enter the 'all tracks' claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Long-term observed X-ray luminosity is commonly used as a proxy for accretion power, and the multi-decade average for V4641 Sgr understates the true time-averaged accretion power.
    Stated in the abstract as the source of the energy crisis and as resolved by the evolutionary L_X; depends on prior observational literature and on the envelope/outflow interpretation.
  • domain assumption MESA binary-evolution physics (mass transfer, winds, angular momentum loss) adequately captures the long-term accretion history of V4641 Sgr when constrained by current system parameters.
    Central methodological premise of the abstract; not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption UHE gamma-ray emission requires a very high time-averaged non-thermal particle power that can be compared directly to the evolutionary accretion luminosity under leptonic and hadronic models.
    Links L_X to the LHAASO/HAWC spectrum; efficiency and duty-cycle factors are not specified in the abstract.
  • domain assumption An extended obscuring/reprocessing envelope or outflow can hide most of the intrinsic X-ray luminosity while still allowing the accretion power to feed particle acceleration.
    Abstract says this is consistent with earlier suggestions; it is load-bearing for reconciling high intrinsic L_X with low observed X-rays.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The long-term accretion luminosity of V4641 Sgr through binary evolution simulations: implications for its ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBMIATK7

@misc{pith2026260316714,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The long-term accretion luminosity of V4641 Sgr through binary evolution simulations: implications for its ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBMIATK7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.16714}
}
abstract

Recent observations by LHAASO and HAWC have revealed extended ultrahigh-energy (UHE; $E>100$ TeV) gamma-ray emission associated with the black-hole X-ray binary (BHXRB) V4641 Sgr, with a spectrum extending up to $\sim0.8$ PeV. Interpreting this emission requires a very high time-averaged non-thermal particle power, significantly exceeding {the long-term observed X-ray luminosity which is commonly used as a proxy for the accretion power}, leading to an apparent ``energy crisis''. To address this, we perform detailed binary-evolution simulations with \textit{MESA}, constrained by the known system parameters inferred from observation. Across an extensive evolutionary grid, all tracks that match the current system parameters pass through a long-lasting, slow mass-transfer phase, with a time-averaged intrinsic X-ray luminosity of over evolutionary timescales of order $L_X\sim10^{38}$erg/s, far above the observed luminosity average over the last few decades. This is consistent with earlier suggestions of an extended obscuring/reprocessing envelope or outflow in V4641 Sgr. The inferred intrinsic accretion power can then readily supply the energy required to explain the UHE emission under the leptonic model, and is also marginally consistent with the requirement from the hadronic model, resolving the energy crisis. This supports V4641 Sgr as a Galactic PeV particle accelerator.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Blees, Arthur W

    Melina K. Blees, Arthur W. Barnard, Peter A. Rose, Samantha P. Roberts, Kathryn L. McGill, Pinshane Y. Huang, Alexander R. Ruyack, Joshua W. Kevek, Bryce Kobrin, David A. Muller, and Paul L. McEuen. Graphene kirigami.Nature, 524(7564):204–207, August 2015. Pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2015

  2. [2]

    Hydrodynamic phonon transport in suspended graphene.Nature Communications, 6:6290, February 2015

    Sangyeop Lee, David Broido, Keivan Esfarjani, and Gang Chen. Hydrodynamic phonon transport in suspended graphene.Nature Communications, 6:6290, February 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Ef- fects of four-phonon scattering on phonon hydrody- namics in monolayer graphene.Physical Review B, 112(10):L100302, September 2025

    Xun Li, Zherui Han, Xiulin Ruan, and Li Shi. Ef- fects of four-phonon scattering on phonon hydrody- namics in monolayer graphene.Physical Review B, 112(10):L100302, September 2025. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  4. [4]

    Thermal conductivity of monolayer graphene: Convergent and lower than dia- mond.Physical Review B, 108(12):L121412, September

    Zherui Han and Xiulin Ruan. Thermal conductivity of monolayer graphene: Convergent and lower than dia- mond.Physical Review B, 108(12):L121412, September

  5. [5]

    Publisher: American Physical Society

  6. [6]

    Fischetti and William G

    Massimo V. Fischetti and William G. Vandenberghe. Mermin-Wagner theorem, flexural modes, and degraded carrier mobility in two-dimensional crystals with bro- ken horizontal mirror symmetry.Physical Review B, 93(15):155413, April 2016. Publisher: American Phys- ical Society

    2016

  7. [7]

    Fasolino, J

    A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, and M. I. Katsnelson. Intrinsic ripples in graphene.Nature Materials, 6(11):858–861, November 2007. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2007

  8. [8]

    Bowick, Andrej Koˇ smrlj, David R

    Mark J. Bowick, Andrej Koˇ smrlj, David R. Nelson, and Rastko Sknepnek. Non-Hookean statistical mechan- ics of clamped graphene ribbons.Physical Review B, 95(10):104109, March 2017. Publisher: American Physi- cal Society

    2017

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Flexural phonons in free-standing graphene.Physical Review Letters, 100(7):076801, February 2008

    Eros Mariani and Felix von Oppen. Flexural phonons in free-standing graphene.Physical Review Letters, 100(7):076801, February 2008. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2008

  2. [10]

    Broido, Luis J

    Jes´ us Carrete, Wu Li, Lucas Lindsay, David A. Broido, Luis J. Gallego, and Natalio Mingo. Physically founded phonon dispersions of few-layer materials and the case of borophene.Materials Research Letters, 4(4):204–211, October 2016. Publisher: Taylor & Francis eprint: https:...

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Bending rigidities and universality of flexural modes in 2D crystals.Journal of Physics: Mate- rials, 3(2):02LT03, June 2020

    Alexander Croy. Bending rigidities and universality of flexural modes in 2D crystals.Journal of Physics: Mate- rials, 3(2):02LT03, June 2020. Publisher: IOP Publish- ing

    2020

  4. [12]

    Gen- eral invariance and equilibrium conditions for lattice dy- namics in 1D, 2D, and 3D materials.npj Computational Materials, 8(1):236, November 2022

    Changpeng Lin, Samuel Ponc´ e, and Nicola Marzari. Gen- eral invariance and equilibrium conditions for lattice dy- namics in 1D, 2D, and 3D materials.npj Computational Materials, 8(1):236, November 2022. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  5. [13]

    P. C. Hohenberg. Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions.Physical Review, 158(2):383–386, June 1967. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1967

  6. [14]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner. Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models.Physical Review Letters, 17(22):1133–1136, November 1966. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1966

  7. [15]

    J. H. Los, A. Fasolino, and M. I. Katsnelson. Scaling be- havior and strain dependence of in-plane elastic proper- ties of graphene.Physical Review Letters, 116(1):015901, January 2016. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  8. [16]

    Correlation between charge inhomo- geneities and structure in graphene and other elec- tronic crystalline membranes.Physical Review B, 80(16):161406, October 2009

    Doron Gazit. Correlation between charge inhomo- geneities and structure in graphene and other elec- tronic crystalline membranes.Physical Review B, 80(16):161406, October 2009. Publisher: American Phys- ical Society

    2009

  9. [17]

    K. V. Zakharchenko, R. Rold´ an, A. Fasolino, and M. I. Katsnelson. Self-consistent screening approximation for flexible membranes: Application to graphene.Physical Review B, 82(12):125435, September 2010. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2010

  10. [18]

    Andrej Koˇ smrlj and David R. Nelson. Response of ther- malized ribbons to pulling and bending.Physical Re- view B, 93(12):125431, March 2016. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  11. [19]

    Ravichandran and David Broido

    Navaneetha K. Ravichandran and David Broido. Unified first-principles theory of thermal properties of insulators. Physical Review B, 98(8):085205, August 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, A.M. Kosevich, and L.P. Pitaevskii.Theory of Elasticity: Volume 7. Course of theoretical physics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986

    1986

  13. [21]

    Hellner, Sabrina D

    Martin Tømterud, Simen K. Hellner, Sabrina D. Eder, Stiven Forti, Domenica Convertino, Joseph R. Manson, Camilla Coletti, Thomas Frederiksen, and Bodil Holst. Observation of increasing bending rigidity of graphene with temperature.Carbon, 238:120150, May 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Flexural mode of graphene on a substrate.Physical Review B, 88(11):115418, September 2013

    Bruno Amorim and Francisco Guinea. Flexural mode of graphene on a substrate.Physical Review B, 88(11):115418, September 2013. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2013

  15. [23]

    WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2nd edition, 2004

    D Nelson, T Piran, and S Weinberg.Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2nd edition, 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    Aronovitz and T

    Joseph A. Aronovitz and T. C. Lubensky. Fluctuations of solid membranes.Physical Review Letters, 60(25):2634– 2637, June 1988. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1988

  17. [25]

    Self-consistent theory of polymerized membranes.Physical Review Let- ters, 69(8):1209–1212, August 1992

    Pierre Le Doussal and Leo Radzihovsky. Self-consistent theory of polymerized membranes.Physical Review Let- ters, 69(8):1209–1212, August 1992. Publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society

    1992

  18. [26]

    D. R. Nelson and L. Peliti. Fluctuations in membranes 12 with crystalline and hexatic order.Journal de Physique, 48(7):1085–1092, July 1987. Publisher: Soci´ et´ e Fran¸ caise de Physique

    1987

  19. [27]

    Structure of physical crystalline membranes within the self-consistent screening approximation.Phys- ical Review E, 80(4):041117, October 2009

    Doron Gazit. Structure of physical crystalline membranes within the self-consistent screening approximation.Phys- ical Review E, 80(4):041117, October 2009. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2009

  20. [28]

    Andrej Koˇ smrlj and David R. Nelson. Mechanical properties of warped membranes.Physical Review E, 88(1):012136, July 2013. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2013

  21. [29]

    Za- kharchenko, and Mikhail I

    Rafael Rold´ an, Annalisa Fasolino, Kostyantyn V. Za- kharchenko, and Mikhail I. Katsnelson. Suppression of anharmonicities in crystalline membranes by exter- nal strain.Physical Review B, 83(17):174104, May 2011. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2011

  22. [30]

    J. H. Los, M. I. Katsnelson, O. V. Yazyev, K. V. Za- kharchenko, and A. Fasolino. Scaling properties of flex- ible membranes from atomistic simulations: Application to graphene.Physical Review B, 80(12):121405, Septem- ber 2009. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2009

  23. [31]

    Paolo Giannozzi, Stefano Baroni, Nicola Bonini, Mat- teo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Guido L. Chiarotti, Matteo Cococcioni, Is- maila Dabo, Andrea Dal Corso, Stefano de Giron- coli, Stefano Fabris, Guido Fratesi, Ralph Gebauer, Uwe Gerstmann, Chris...

    2009

  24. [32]

    Lindsay, W

    L. Lindsay, W. Li, J. Carrete, N. Mingo, D. A. Broido, and T. L. Reinecke. Phonon thermal transport in strained and unstrained graphene from first principles.Phys. Rev. B, 89, April 2014. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2014

  25. [33]

    Moore, Lucas Lindsay, Zachary H

    Jae Hun Seol, Insun Jo, Arden L. Moore, Lucas Lindsay, Zachary H. Aitken, Michael T. Pettes, Xuesong Li, Zhen Yao, Rui Huang, David Broido, Natalio Mingo, Rod- ney S. Ruoff, and Li Shi. Two-dimensional phonon trans- port in supported graphene.Science, 328(5975):213–216, April ...

    2010

  26. [34]

    Xavier Alvarez

    Jordi Tur-Prats, Zherui Han, Albert Beardo, Xiulin Ruan, and F. Xavier Alvarez. High-order anharmonic- ities shape phonon hydrodynamic effects in graphene. Nano Letters, 25(29):11203–11209, July 2025. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2025

  27. [35]

    Ravichandran and David Broido

    Navaneetha K. Ravichandran and David Broido. Phonon-phonon interactions in strongly bonded solids: Selection rules and higher-order processes.Physical Re- view X, 10(2):021063, June 2020. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  28. [36]

    Statistical mechanics of nanotubes, May 2023

    Siddhartha Sarkar, Mohamed El Hedi Bahri, and Andrej Koˇ smrlj. Statistical mechanics of nanotubes, May 2023. arXiv:2305.14602 [cond-mat]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Thibault Sohier, Matteo Calandra, and Francesco Mauri. Two-dimensional Fr¨ ohlich interaction in transition- metal dichalcogenide monolayers: Theoretical model- ing and first-principles calculations.Physical Review B, 94(8):085415, August 2016. Publisher: American Physi- cal Society

    2016

  30. [38]

    Breakdown of optical phonons’ splitting in two-dimensional materials

    Thibault Sohier, Marco Gibertini, Matteo Calandra, Francesco Mauri, and Nicola Marzari. Breakdown of optical phonons’ splitting in two-dimensional materials. Nano Letters, 17(6):3758–3763, June 2017. Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2017

  31. [39]

    Burmistrov, V.Yu

    I.S. Burmistrov, V.Yu. Kachorovskii, M.J. Klug, and J. Schmalian. Emergent continuous symmetry in anisotropic flexible two-dimensional materials.Physical Review Letters, 128(9):096101, March 2022. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.