pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.18748 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-19 · 🧮 math.PR

Recognition: no theorem link

Invariance principles for rough walks in random conductances

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR
keywords random walksrandom conductancesrough pathsinvariance principlesquenched convergencecorrector potentialp-variationhomogenization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Random walks in random conductances converge in rough path topology under moment conditions on the corrector.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes annealed and quenched invariance principles for random walks in random conductances when the paths are lifted to the p-variation rough path topology. The results apply even when the conductances are degenerate or permit long-range jumps. The proof uses a structural framework that upgrades classical invariance principles by separating the martingale lift from integrals involving the corrector and its quadratic covariations. In the quenched setting the key input is the existence of a stationary potential for the corrector that possesses moments strictly greater than two; this forces the corrector contribution to vanish in p-variation for every p greater than two. A transfer lemma converts spatial moment bounds into the required stationary potential, isolating the precise analytic condition needed for the pathwise result.

Core claim

Under the assumption that a stationary potential for the corrector exists with 2 plus epsilon moments for some epsilon greater than zero, both annealed and quenched invariance principles hold for the random walks lifted to p-variation rough paths, for any p greater than two. The corrector term then vanishes in p-variation, so that the rough path is controlled solely by the martingale part together with its quadratic covariations. The argument works for degenerate conductances and long-range jumps and supplies a modular route from existing spatial moment estimates to the rough-path convergence via an auxiliary transfer lemma that constructs the stationary potential.

What carries the argument

The stationary potential of the corrector, whose 2 plus epsilon moments guarantee that the corrector vanishes in p-variation for every p greater than two, thereby decoupling the rough-path limit from corrector fluctuations.

If this is right

  • Rough-path convergence permits pathwise solutions of differential equations driven by the random walks.
  • Classical homogenization results extend directly to rough-path settings for processes with jumps.
  • The decoupling of martingale and corrector terms yields a reusable template for proving rough-path limits in related random-media models.
  • Quenched statements follow from moment assumptions alone once the transfer lemma supplies the potential.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same moment condition could be checked numerically in finite-volume approximations to test convergence rates.
  • Links may exist to large-deviation estimates for the rough-path distance in random conductances.
  • The transfer lemma invites verification in long-range or non-elliptic conductance models beyond nearest-neighbor cases.

Load-bearing premise

The existence of a stationary potential for the corrector that possesses moments strictly greater than two.

What would settle it

An explicit environment in which the corrector admits a stationary potential with exactly two moments yet the lifted path fails to converge in p-variation to the Brownian rough path, or in which the corrector does not vanish in p-variation.

read the original abstract

We establish annealed and quenched invariance principles for random walks in random conductances lifted to the p-variation rough path topology, allowing for degenerate environments and long-range jumps. Our proof is based on a unified structural strategy where pathwise convergence is viewed as a natural upgrade of the classical theory. This approach decouples the martingale lift from terms involving the integrals with respect to the corrector and the quadratic covariations. In the quenched regime, we show that the existence of a stationary potential for the corrector with $2+\epsilon$ moments is sufficient to ensure the vanishing of the corrector in $p$-variation for any $p>2$. This input, combined with our structural framework, provides a direct and modular pathway to rough path convergence. We further provide a transfer lemma to construct this potential from spatial moment bounds. While presently verified in the literature primarily for nearest-neighbor settings, our formulation isolates the exact analytic input required for pathwise convergence in more general environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes annealed and quenched invariance principles for random walks in random conductances lifted to the p-variation rough path topology. It handles degenerate environments and long-range jumps via a structural upgrade of classical invariance principles that decouples the martingale lift from corrector integrals and quadratic covariations. The quenched result relies on the existence of a stationary corrector potential with 2+ε moments being sufficient for the scaled corrector path to vanish in p-variation for any p>2, together with a transfer lemma constructing this potential from spatial moment bounds.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a modular framework for rough-path convergence in random media that extends beyond nearest-neighbor settings. The explicit isolation of the moment input required for pathwise convergence is a clear strength and could streamline future applications in stochastic homogenization and disordered systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (quenched regime): the assertion that a stationary potential with only 2+ε moments guarantees vanishing of the corrector in p-variation for arbitrary p>2 is load-bearing for the quenched invariance principle. Standard ergodic theorems control averages of |Δφ_k|^r only for r≤2+ε; for p>2+ε the term n^{1-p/2} times the p-average need not vanish, and long-range jumps can exacerbate large increments. The manuscript must supply a self-contained argument (or counter-example exclusion) showing why the bound still holds in this range.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1, transfer lemma: the reduction from spatial moment bounds to the existence of a stationary potential with 2+ε moments is stated but the quantitative dependence on the range of the jumps is not made explicit. If the lemma requires stronger spatial integrability when jumps are long-range, this would tighten the overall moment hypothesis and affect the scope of the quenched result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the p-variation norm is introduced without a displayed definition; a short displayed equation would improve readability.
  2. [Theorem 2.3] The statement of the annealed result (Theorem 2.3) does not explicitly list the moment assumptions on the conductances; cross-reference to the quenched hypotheses would clarify the comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important points on the quenched regime that we will clarify in the revision. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (quenched regime): the assertion that a stationary potential with only 2+ε moments guarantees vanishing of the corrector in p-variation for arbitrary p>2 is load-bearing for the quenched invariance principle. Standard ergodic theorems control averages of |Δφ_k|^r only for r≤2+ε; for p>2+ε the term n^{1-p/2} times the p-average need not vanish, and long-range jumps can exacerbate large increments. The manuscript must supply a self-contained argument (or counter-example exclusion) showing why the bound still holds in this range.

    Authors: We agree that a fully self-contained argument is needed to justify the vanishing of the scaled corrector in p-variation for all p>2 under only 2+ε moments. The current §4 sketch relies on ergodic averaging combined with a Hölder-type interpolation to control the p-variation norm, but this step is not expanded sufficiently for long-range jumps. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new lemma (placed after the definition of the stationary potential) that supplies the missing estimates: we bound the p-variation increment directly via the 2+ε integrability, using a truncation argument that isolates the contribution of large jumps and shows the n^{1-p/2} factor still tends to zero uniformly in the environment. This will also explicitly treat the long-range case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1, transfer lemma: the reduction from spatial moment bounds to the existence of a stationary potential with 2+ε moments is stated but the quantitative dependence on the range of the jumps is not made explicit. If the lemma requires stronger spatial integrability when jumps are long-range, this would tighten the overall moment hypothesis and affect the scope of the quenched result.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the lack of explicit dependence. The transfer lemma (Lemma 5.1) is proved via a standard averaging procedure over the environment that does not require stronger integrability when the jump range increases; the 2+ε moment bound is preserved uniformly because the spatial averaging is taken with respect to the stationary measure and the jump kernel is assumed integrable. Nevertheless, to remove any ambiguity we will revise the statement of Lemma 5.1 to display the precise constants (which remain independent of the range under our standing assumptions) and add a short remark explaining why long-range jumps do not force higher moments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation upgrades classical inputs via independent structural lemmas

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from the existence of a stationary corrector potential (with 2+ε moments) to p-variation vanishing, then to rough-path invariance, via an explicit transfer lemma that constructs the potential from spatial moment bounds. This input is treated as an external analytic condition (verified in nearest-neighbor cases in the literature) rather than derived from the target convergence statement. No equation equates the output to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the structural decoupling of martingale lifts from corrector integrals is presented as a modular upgrade of classical invariance principles without reducing to those principles by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard results from martingale theory, rough path theory, and homogenization, plus one key domain assumption on the corrector potential.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a stationary potential for the corrector with 2+ε moments
    Invoked in the quenched regime to guarantee vanishing of the corrector in p-variation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1152 out tokens · 40719 ms · 2026-05-15T08:48:57.657572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A rough functional breuer-major theorem

    Henri Elad Altman, Tom Klose, and Nicolas Perkowski. A rough functional breuer-major theorem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16615, 2026

  2. [2]

    Andres, J.-D

    S. Andres, J.-D. Deuschel, and M. Slowik. Invariance principle for the random conductance model in a degenerate ergodic environment.Ann. Probab., 43(4):1866–1891, 2015

  3. [3]

    Andres and S

    S. Andres and S. Neukamm. Berry–esseen theorem and quantitative homogenization for the ran- dom conductance model with degenerate conductances.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 7(2):184–296, 2019

  4. [4]

    M. T. Barlow. Random walks on supercritical percolation clusters.Ann. Probab., 32(4):3024– 3084, 2004

  5. [5]

    Berger and M

    N. Berger and M. Biskup. Quenched invariance principle for simple random walk on percolation clusters.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 137(1-2):83–120, 2007. 52 JOHANNES B ¨AUMLER, NOAM BERGER, TAL ORENSHTEIN, AND M. SLOWIK

  6. [6]

    Convergence of probability measures.Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 1999

    Patrick Billingsley . Convergence of probability measures.Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 1999

  7. [7]

    M. Biskup. Recent progress on the random conductance model.Probab. Surv., 8:294–373, 2011

  8. [8]

    Biskup and T

    M. Biskup and T. M. Prescott. Functional CLT for random walk among bounded random conduc- tances.Electron. J. Probab., 12:no. 49, 1323–1348, 2007

  9. [9]

    Breuillard, P

    E. Breuillard, P. K. Friz, and M. Huesmann. From random walks to rough paths.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 137(10):3487–3496, 2009

  10. [10]

    Periodic homogenisation for two dimensional generalised parabolic anderson model: Y

    Yilin Chen, Benjamin Fehrman, and Weijun Xu. Periodic homogenisation for two dimensional generalised parabolic anderson model: Y. chen et al.Probability Theory and Related Fields, pages 1–52, 2026

  11. [11]

    Chevyrev and P

    I. Chevyrev and P. K. Friz. Canonical RDEs and general semimartingales as rough paths.Ann. Probab., 47(1):420–463, 2019

  12. [12]

    Random walks and l ´evy processes as rough paths.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 170(3):891–932, 2018

    Ilya Chevyrev. Random walks and l ´evy processes as rough paths.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 170(3):891–932, 2018

  13. [13]

    Superdiffusive limits for deterministic fast–slow dynamical systems.Probability theory and related fields, 178(3):735–770, 2020

    Ilya Chevyrev, Peter K Friz, Alexey Korepanov, and Ian Melbourne. Superdiffusive limits for deterministic fast–slow dynamical systems.Probability theory and related fields, 178(3):735–770, 2020

  14. [14]

    Characteristic functions of measures on geometric rough paths

    Ilya Chevyrev and Terry Lyons. Characteristic functions of measures on geometric rough paths. Annals of Probability, 44(6):4049–4082, 2016

  15. [15]

    P. Dario. Optimal corrector estimates on percolation cluster.Ann. Appl. Probab., 31(1):377–431, 2021

  16. [16]

    De Masi, P

    A. De Masi, P. A. Ferrari, S. Goldstein, and W. D. Wick. An invariance principle for reversible Markov processes. Applications to random motions in random environments.J. Stat. Phys., 55(3- 4):787–855, 1989

  17. [17]

    Deuschel, T

    J.-D. Deuschel, T. A. Nguyen, and M. Slowik. Quenched invariance principles for the random conductance model on a random graph with degenerate ergodic weights.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 170(1-2):363–386, 2018

  18. [18]

    Deuschel, T

    J.-D. Deuschel, T. Orenshtein, and N. Perkowski. Additive functionals as rough paths.Ann. Probab., 49(3):1450–1479, 2021

  19. [19]

    Rough homogenization for langevin dynamics on fluctuating helfrich surfaces.Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 43(3):423–445, 2025

    Ana Djurdjevac, Helena Kremp, and Nicolas Perkowski. Rough homogenization for langevin dynamics on fluctuating helfrich surfaces.Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 43(3):423–445, 2025

  20. [20]

    Cambridge University Press, 4th edition,

    Richard Durrett.Probability: Theory and Examples. Cambridge University Press, 4th edition,

  21. [21]

    Jan 2010 preprint/early version

  22. [22]

    Engel, P

    M. Engel, P. K. Friz, and T. Orenshtein. Nonlinear effects within invariance principles.Commu- nications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2026

  23. [23]

    An ergodic theorem with weights and applications to random measures, homogenization and hydrodynamics.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 180:104522, 2025

    Alessandra Faggionato. An ergodic theorem with weights and applications to random measures, homogenization and hydrodynamics.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 180:104522, 2025

  24. [24]

    Flegel, M

    F. Flegel, M. Heida, and M. Slowik. Homogenization theory for the random conductance model with degenerate ergodic weights and unbounded-range jumps.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar ´e Probab. Stat., 55(3):1226–1257, 2019

  25. [25]

    P. K. Friz and H. Zhang. Differential equations driven by rough paths with jumps.J. Differential Equations, 264(10):6226–6301, 2018

  26. [26]

    P. K. Friz and P. Zorin-Kranich. Rough semimartingales andp-variation estimates for martingale transforms.Ann. Probab., 51(2):397–441, 2023

  27. [27]

    Functional limit theorems for volterra pro- cesses and applications to homogenization.Nonlinearity, 35(4):1521–1557, 2022

    Johann Gehringer, Xue-Mei Li, and Julian Sieber. Functional limit theorems for volterra pro- cesses and applications to homogenization.Nonlinearity, 35(4):1521–1557, 2022

  28. [28]

    Gloria and F

    A. Gloria and F. Otto. An optimal variance estimate in stochastic homogenization of discrete elliptic equations.Ann. Probab., 39(3):779–856, 2011. ROUGH WALKS IN RANDOM CONDUCTANCES 53

  29. [29]

    Time-reversibility and nonvanishing l´evy area.Nonlinear- ity, 37(7):075018, 2024

    Georg A Gottwald and Ian Melbourne. Time-reversibility and nonvanishing l´evy area.Nonlinear- ity, 37(7):075018, 2024

  30. [30]

    Gubinelli and N

    M. Gubinelli and N. Perkowski. Energy solutions of KPZ are unique.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 31(2):427–471, 2018

  31. [31]

    Generating diffusions with fractional brownian motion.Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, 396(1):91–141, 2022

    Martin Hairer and Xue-Mei Li. Generating diffusions with fractional brownian motion.Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, 396(1):91–141, 2022

  32. [32]

    I. S. Helland. Central limit theorems for martingales with discrete or continuous time.Scand. J. Statist., 9(2):79–94, 1982

  33. [33]

    Ishiwata, H

    S. Ishiwata, H. Kawabi, and R. Namba. Central limit theorems for non-symmetric random walks on nilpotent covering graphs: Part i.Electronic Journal of Probability, 25:1–46, 2020

  34. [34]

    Ishiwata, H

    S. Ishiwata, H. Kawabi, and R. Namba. Central limit theorems for non-symmetric random walks on nilpotent covering graphs: Part ii.Potential Analysis, 55(1):127–166, 2021

  35. [35]

    Friz and Yuri Kifer

    Peter K. Friz and Yuri Kifer. Almost sure diffusion approximation in averaging via rough paths theory .Electronic Journal of Probability, 29:1–56, 2024

  36. [36]

    Rough path recursions and diffusion approximations.The Annals of Applied Proba- bility, 26(1):425–461, 2016

    David Kelly . Rough path recursions and diffusion approximations.The Annals of Applied Proba- bility, 26(1):425–461, 2016

  37. [37]

    Smooth approximation of stochastic differential equations.An- nals of Probability, 44(1):479–520, 2016

    David Kelly and Ian Melbourne. Smooth approximation of stochastic differential equations.An- nals of Probability, 44(1):479–520, 2016

  38. [38]

    Kipnis and S

    C. Kipnis and S. R. S. Varadhan. Central limit theorem for additive functionals of reversible Markov processes and applications to simple exclusions.Comm. Math. Phys., 104(1):1–19, 1986

  39. [39]

    Komorowski, C

    T. Komorowski, C. Landim, and S. Olla.Fluctuations in Markov processes, volume 345 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sci- ences]. Springer, Heidelberg, 2012. Time symmetry and martingale approximation

  40. [40]

    K ¨unnemann

    R. K ¨unnemann. The diffusion limit for reversible jump processes onZ d with ergodic random bond conductivities.Commun. Math. Phys., 90(1):27–68, 1983

  41. [41]

    T. G. Kurtz and P. Protter. Weak limit theorems for stochastic integrals and stochastic differential equations.Ann. Probab., 19(3):1035–1070, 1991

  42. [42]

    Lopusanschi and T

    O. Lopusanschi and T. Orenshtein. Ballistic random walks in random environment as rough paths: convergence and area anomaly .ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 18(1):945–962, 2021

  43. [43]

    Lopusanschi and D

    O. Lopusanschi and D. Simon. L´evy area with a drift as a renormalization limit of Markov chains on periodic graphs.Stochastic Process. Appl., 128(7):2404–2426, 2018

  44. [44]

    Area anomaly in the rough path brownian scaling limit of hidden markov walks.Bernoulli, 26(4):3111–3138, 2020

    Olga Lopusanschi and Damien Simon. Area anomaly in the rough path brownian scaling limit of hidden markov walks.Bernoulli, 26(4):3111–3138, 2020

  45. [45]

    Mathieu and A

    P. Mathieu and A. Piatnitski. Quenched invariance principles for random walks on percolation clusters.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 463(2085):2287–2307, 2007

  46. [46]

    J.-C. Mourrat. A quantitative central limit theorem for the random walk among random conduc- tances.Electron. J. Probab., 17(97):1–17, 2012

  47. [47]

    Orenshtein

    T. Orenshtein. Rough invariance principle for delayed regenerative processes.Electron. Commun. Probab., 26:Paper No. 37, 13, 2021

  48. [48]

    M. D. Penrose and A. Pisztora. Large deviations for discrete and continuous percolation.Adv. in Appl. Probab., 28(1):29–52, 1996

  49. [49]

    L. C. G. Rogers and D. Williams.Diffusions, Markov processes, and martingales. Vol. 2. Cambridge Mathematical Library . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. Itˆo calculus, Reprint of the second (1994) edition

  50. [50]

    Sidoravicius and A.-S

    V. Sidoravicius and A.-S. Sznitman. Quenched invariance principles for walks on clusters of percolation or among random conductances.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 129(2):219–244, 2004

  51. [51]

    ¨Uber stochastische Asymptoten und Grenzwerte.Metron, 5(3):3–89, 1925

    E Slutsky . ¨Uber stochastische Asymptoten und Grenzwerte.Metron, 5(3):3–89, 1925. 54 JOHANNES B ¨AUMLER, NOAM BERGER, TAL ORENSHTEIN, AND M. SLOWIK

  52. [52]

    On the relation between ordinary and stochastic differential equations.International Journal of Engineering Science, 3(2):213–229, 1965

    Eugene Wong and Moshe Zakai. On the relation between ordinary and stochastic differential equations.International Journal of Engineering Science, 3(2):213–229, 1965

  53. [53]

    Weighted l´epingle inequality .Bernoulli, 26(3):2311–2318, 2020

    Pavel Zorin-Kranich. Weighted l´epingle inequality .Bernoulli, 26(3):2311–2318, 2020. UNIVERSITY OFCALIFORNIA, LOSANGELES Current address: 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, USA Email address:jbaeumler@math.ucla.edu TECHNISCHEUNIVERSIT ¨ATM ¨UNCHEN Current address: Boltzmannstraße 3, 85748 Garching Email address:noam.berger@tum.de UNIVERSIT `A DEGLISTUDI...