pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.19240 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-08 · 💻 cs.GR · math.CV

Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of discrete geometric mappings

Zhiyuan Lyu , Gary P. T. Choi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR math.CV
keywords Beltrami coefficientangular distortionquasi-conformal mappingdiscrete geometric mappingtriangle meshconformalitysurface mapping
0
0 comments X

The pith

The norm of the Beltrami coefficient equals the absolute angular distortion of triangles under a discrete mapping.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a direct relationship between the Beltrami coefficient of a geometric mapping and the angular distortion it produces on triangle elements. In quasi-conformal theory the Beltrami coefficient already encodes how much a mapping deviates from conformality. For discrete piecewise-linear maps on triangle meshes this deviation turns out to be exactly the absolute change in angles at each triangle. The result supplies a simple closed-form estimate for the largest possible angular distortion once the Beltrami coefficient is known.

Core claim

For any discrete mapping defined on a triangle mesh the absolute angular distortion of each triangle equals the Euclidean norm of its Beltrami coefficient, and the maximal distortion over the mesh is bounded by a simple function of that norm.

What carries the argument

The Beltrami coefficient, whose norm directly quantifies the local stretching that produces angular change in each triangle.

If this is right

  • Any algorithm that already controls the Beltrami coefficient automatically controls angular distortion without extra checks.
  • Conformal, quasi-conformal, and area-preserving methods can be compared on the same scale using a single scalar.
  • Error bounds derived from the Beltrami coefficient apply uniformly to every triangle in the mesh.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mesh refinement strategies could be guided directly by local Beltrami values rather than by separate angle-error monitors.
  • The same relation may extend to quadrilateral or polygonal meshes once an appropriate discrete Beltrami operator is defined.
  • Applications that tolerate bounded angle error can now set explicit tolerances on the Beltrami coefficient instead of running post-hoc distortion checks.

Load-bearing premise

The Beltrami coefficient can be defined and computed on piecewise-linear triangle meshes while still obeying the same algebraic relation to angle change that holds in the smooth case.

What would settle it

Compute both the Beltrami norm and the measured angle changes on a single triangle for any given linear map; the two quantities must match within floating-point error.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.19240 by Gary P. T. Choi, Zhiyuan Lyu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The relationship between the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of discrete geometric mappings. (a)–(b) Given a discrete surface such as a brain cortical surface, one can utilize surface parameterization methods to map it onto another domain. Here, the surface is parameterized onto the unit disk using the method in [46]. (c) To assess the conformal distortion of the map, one way is to compute the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration of quasi-conformal maps. Under a quasi-conformal map, an infinitesimal circle is mapped to an infinitesimal ellipse with bounded eccentricity. for some complex-valued function µ with ∥µ∥∞ < 1, where ∂f ∂z is given by Eq. (2) and ∂f ∂z is defined as ∂f ∂z = fz = 1 2  ∂f ∂x − i ∂f ∂y  . (6) In particular, the complex-valued function µ is called the Beltrami coefficient of f, which serves as… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An illustration for the proof of Theorem 3. After a rotation, the angle induced by two curves is unchanged. Then we use an affine transformation to approximate the quasi-conformal mapping and obtain the relationship between the angles in terms of the Beltrami coefficient. where ξ = Re(ζ), η = Im(ζ), and: λx = |A| + |B|, (18) λy = |A| − |B|, (19) Kz = λx λy . (20) In the new coordinates, the principal direc… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An illustration of angular distortion. Here, we show the angles θ and ϕ in their local neighborhood. (Left) The original angle θ obtained by the intersection of curves. (Right) The result angle ϕ after the affine transformation. Let the original angle be θ and set n = tan θ. Let α be the signed angle from the x−axis (maximal stretch direction) to one side of the angle, and write b = tan α. And the other si… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of different mappings for open surfaces. Each row shows one example. (a) Rectangle conformal map [58] of the Human face model. (b) Annulus conformal map [59] of the Sophie model. (c) Density-equalizing map [22] of the Square model. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the mapping result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µ… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of spherical conformal parameterization [8] of genus-0 surfaces. Each row shows one example. (a) The David model. (b) The brain model. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the parameterization result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular distortion ϵangleT . the mapping into t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of spherical density-equalizing map [24] for genus-0 closed surfaces. Each row shows one example. (a) The Max Planck model. (b) The brain model. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the parameterization result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular distortion ϵangleT . be flexi… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of ellipsoidal conformal map [47] for genus-0 closed surfaces. Each row shows one example. (a) The Buddha model. (b) The hippocampus model. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the parameterization result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular distortion ϵangleT . 4.3 Further a… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion of ellipsoidal density-equalizing map [53] for genus-0 closed surfaces. Each row shows one example. (a) The hippocampus model. (b) The twisted ball model. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the parameterization result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular distortion ϵangleT … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion for meshes with different quality. Each row shows one example. (a) A Delaunay mesh with highly regular triangle elements. (b) A non-Delaunay mesh with a large number of sharp triangles. Left to right: The input mesh, the mapping result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular dist… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion for meshes with different resolutions. Each row shows one example. (a) A coarse mesh with around 900 elements. (b) A denser mesh with around 3600 elements. Left to right: The input surface mesh, the mapping result, the histogram of the norm of the Beltrami coefficient |µT |, and the histogram of the face-based angular distortion ϵangleT . [4] X… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Over the past several decades, geometric mapping methods have been extensively developed and utilized for many practical problems in science and engineering. To assess the quality of geometric mappings, one common consideration is their conformality. In particular, it is well-known that conformal mappings preserve angles and hence the local geometry, which is beneficial in many applications. Therefore, many existing works have focused on the angular distortion as a measure of the conformality of mappings. More recently, quasi-conformal theory has attracted increasing attention in the development of geometric mapping methods, in which the Beltrami coefficient has also been considered as a representation of the conformal distortion. However, the precise connection between these two concepts has not been analyzed. In this work, we study the connection between the two concepts and establish a series of theoretical results. In particular, we discover a simple relationship between the norm of the Beltrami coefficient of a mapping and the absolute angular distortion of triangle elements under the mapping. We can further estimate the maximal angular distortion using a simple formula in terms of the Beltrami coefficient. We verify the developed theoretical results and estimates using numerical experiments on multiple geometric mapping methods, covering conformal mapping, quasi-conformal mapping, and area-preserving mapping algorithms, for a variety of surface meshes in biology and engineering. Altogether, by establishing the theoretical foundation for the relationship between the angular distortion and Beltrami coefficient, our work opens up new avenues for the quantification and analysis of surface mapping algorithms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to establish a direct algebraic relationship between the norm of the Beltrami coefficient of a discrete piecewise-linear mapping and the absolute angular distortion of the triangles under that mapping. It further derives a simple formula for estimating the maximal angular distortion from the Beltrami coefficient and supports both the relationship and the estimate with numerical experiments on conformal, quasi-conformal, and area-preserving mappings applied to multiple surface meshes from biology and engineering.

Significance. If the claimed relationship holds exactly for discrete mappings, the work supplies a theoretically grounded link between quasi-conformal distortion measures and the angular-distortion quantities already used in geometry-processing pipelines. The breadth of the numerical verification across mapping types and mesh classes is a concrete strength that would make the formula immediately usable for algorithm analysis and comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical results] The central claim (abstract and theoretical results) asserts that the continuous quasi-conformal relation between ||μ|| and angular distortion carries over exactly to per-triangle affine Jacobians on a triangulated surface. The manuscript does not supply an explicit proof that the chosen local coordinate charts are isometric to the tangent plane or that angular distortion is measured intrinsically rather than in the ambient embedding; without this step the discrete-to-continuous transfer remains an assumption rather than a derivation.
  2. [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section: the reported verification shows agreement but does not quantify residual deviations or isolate their sources (chart construction, discrete metric, or floating-point evaluation of the formula). Because the skeptic concern is precisely that such deviations may appear on non-flat surfaces, the experiments as described do not yet confirm that the claimed formula is free of systematic mismatch.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Theoretical results] Notation for the discrete Beltrami coefficient per triangle should be introduced with an explicit equation (e.g., Eq. (X)) that shows how the affine Jacobian is normalized by the local metric; this would make the subsequent claims easier to follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions to strengthen the theoretical derivation and the quantitative analysis of the experiments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical results] The central claim (abstract and theoretical results) asserts that the continuous quasi-conformal relation between ||μ|| and angular distortion carries over exactly to per-triangle affine Jacobians on a triangulated surface. The manuscript does not supply an explicit proof that the chosen local coordinate charts are isometric to the tangent plane or that angular distortion is measured intrinsically rather than in the ambient embedding; without this step the discrete-to-continuous transfer remains an assumption rather than a derivation.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. In the revised version, we will add a subsection detailing the local coordinate setup. Specifically, each source and target triangle is isometrically mapped to the plane via its own metric, making the charts isometric to the tangent planes by construction. The angular distortion is then computed using the intrinsic metrics of these planes, ensuring it is independent of the ambient 3D embedding. This establishes that the Beltrami coefficient, derived from the affine Jacobian in these coordinates, directly relates to the intrinsic angular distortion via the same algebraic formula as in the continuous case. We will include the explicit steps of this derivation to remove any ambiguity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section: the reported verification shows agreement but does not quantify residual deviations or isolate their sources (chart construction, discrete metric, or floating-point evaluation of the formula). Because the skeptic concern is precisely that such deviations may appear on non-flat surfaces, the experiments as described do not yet confirm that the claimed formula is free of systematic mismatch.

    Authors: We concur that quantifying the residuals is important for addressing potential skeptic concerns. We will revise the numerical experiments section to include detailed error metrics, such as the maximum, mean, and standard deviation of the differences between the formula-based estimates and the directly measured angular distortions for each mapping type and mesh. Additionally, we will provide an analysis showing that any small residuals are attributable to numerical precision in computing the singular values for the Beltrami coefficient and the angle measurements, with no evidence of systematic bias related to surface curvature, as the computations are performed locally per triangle. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relation derived from standard quasi-conformal identities applied to per-triangle Jacobians

full rationale

The paper applies the classical formula relating |μ| to angular distortion (from continuous quasi-conformal theory) to the affine map on each triangle. The discrete Beltrami coefficient is defined directly from the Jacobian matrix of the piecewise-linear map in local coordinates; the angular-distortion expression follows algebraically from the same matrix without fitting parameters or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the same authors, and the numerical verification uses independent mesh examples rather than re-deriving the input quantities. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external quasi-conformal benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The contribution rests on standard quasi-conformal theory applied to discrete triangle meshes; no free parameters, new axioms beyond standard math, or invented entities are indicated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard properties of the Beltrami coefficient in quasi-conformal mappings
    The work relies on well-established definitions from complex analysis and quasi-conformal theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1264 out tokens · 42568 ms · 2026-05-16T06:59:33.930324+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Surface parameterization: A tutorial and survey,

    M. S. Floater and K. Hormann, “Surface parameterization: A tutorial and survey,” inAdvances in Multiresolution for Geometric Modelling, pp. 157–186, Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Mesh parameterization methods and their applications,

    A. Sheffer, E. Praun, and K. Rose, “Mesh parameterization methods and their applications,”Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–171, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    M. P. Do Carmo,Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Courier Dover Publications, 2016. 23 (a) (b) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Angular distortion (radian) 0 100 200 300 400Number of triangles 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Angular distortion (radian) 0 20 40 60 80 100Number of triangles Figure 11:Evaluation of the Beltrami coefficient and angular distortion for meshe...

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping,

    X. Gu, Y. Wang, T. F. Chan, P. M. Thompson, and S.-T. Yau, “Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 949–958, 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Folding-free global conformal mapping for genus-0 surfaces by harmonic energy minimization,

    R. Lai, Z. Wen, W. Yin, X. Gu, and L. M. Lui, “Folding-free global conformal mapping for genus-0 surfaces by harmonic energy minimization,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 705–725, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    On the Laplace- Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening,

    S. Angenent, S. Haker, A. Tannenbaum, and R. Kikinis, “On the Laplace- Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 700–711, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Conformal surface parameterization for texture mapping,

    S. Haker, S. Angenent, A. Tannenbaum, R. Kikinis, G. Sapiro, and M. Halle, “Conformal surface parameterization for texture mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 2000. 24

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    FLASH: Fast landmark aligned spherical harmonic parameterization for genus-0 closed brain surfaces,

    P. T. Choi, K. C. Lam, and L. M. Lui, “FLASH: Fast landmark aligned spherical harmonic parameterization for genus-0 closed brain surfaces,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–94, 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Discrete conformal mappings via circle patterns,

    L. Kharevych, B. Springborn, and P. Schr¨ oder, “Discrete conformal mappings via circle patterns,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 412–438, 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Conformal equivalence of triangle meshes,

    B. Springborn, P. Schr¨ oder, and U. Pinkall, “Conformal equivalence of triangle meshes,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Discrete surface Ricci flow,

    M. Jin, J. Kim, F. Luo, and X. Gu, “Discrete surface Ricci flow,”IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1030–1043, 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Generalized discrete Ricci flow,

    Y.-L. Yang, R. Guo, F. Luo, S.-M. Hu, and X. Gu, “Generalized discrete Ricci flow,”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2005–2014, 2009

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Slit map: Conformal parameterization for multiply connected surfaces,

    X. Yin, J. Dai, S.-T. Yau, and X. Gu, “Slit map: Conformal parameterization for multiply connected surfaces,” inInternational Conference on Geometric Modeling and Processing, pp. 410–422, Springer, 2008

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Can mean-curvature flow be modified to be non-singular?,

    M. Kazhdan, J. Solomon, and M. Ben-Chen, “Can mean-curvature flow be modified to be non-singular?,”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1745– 1754, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Robust fairing via conformal curvature flow,

    K. Crane, U. Pinkall, and P. Schr¨ oder, “Robust fairing via conformal curvature flow,”ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    An efficient energy min- imization for conformal parameterizations,

    M.-H. Yueh, W.-W. Lin, C.-T. Wu, and S.-T. Yau, “An efficient energy min- imization for conformal parameterizations,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 203–227, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    A robust Hessian-based trust region algorithm for spherical conformal parameterizations,

    Z.-H. Tan, T. Li, W.-W. Lin, and S.-T. Yau, “A robust Hessian-based trust region algorithm for spherical conformal parameterizations,”Science China Mathematics, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1461–1486, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Parallelizable global conformal parameterization of simply-connected surfaces via partial welding,

    G. P. T. Choi, Y. Leung-Liu, X. Gu, and L. M. Lui, “Parallelizable global conformal parameterization of simply-connected surfaces via partial welding,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1049–1083, 2020. 25

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Convergence analysis of Dirichlet energy minimization for spherical conformal parameterizations,

    W.-H. Liao, T.-M. Huang, W.-W. Lin, and M.-H. Yueh, “Convergence analysis of Dirichlet energy minimization for spherical conformal parameterizations,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 98, no. 29, pp. 1–28, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Authalic parameterization of general surfaces using Lie advection,

    G. Zou, J. Hu, X. Gu, and J. Hua, “Authalic parameterization of general surfaces using Lie advection,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2005–2014, 2011

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Area- preservation mapping using optimal mass transport,

    X. Zhao, Z. Su, X. D. Gu, A. Kaufman, J. Sun, J. Gao, and F. Luo, “Area- preservation mapping using optimal mass transport,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2838–2847, 2013

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Density-equalizing maps for simply connected open surfaces,

    G. P. T. Choi and C. H. Rycroft, “Density-equalizing maps for simply connected open surfaces,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1134–1178, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Area-preserving mapping of 3D carotid ultrasound images using density-equalizing reference map,

    G. P. T. Choi, B. Chiu, and C. H. Rycroft, “Area-preserving mapping of 3D carotid ultrasound images using density-equalizing reference map,”IEEE Trans- actions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 2507–2517, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Spherical density-equalizing map for genus-0 closed surfaces,

    Z. Lyu, L. M. Lui, and G. P. T. Choi, “Spherical density-equalizing map for genus-0 closed surfaces,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2110–2141, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Toroidal density-equalizing map for genus-one surfaces,

    S. Yao and G. P. T. Choi, “Toroidal density-equalizing map for genus-one surfaces,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 472, p. 116844, 2026

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    A novel stretch energy minimization algorithm for equiareal parameterizations,

    M.-H. Yueh, W.-W. Lin, C.-T. Wu, and S.-T. Yau, “A novel stretch energy minimization algorithm for equiareal parameterizations,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1353–1386, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Theoretical foundation of the stretch energy minimization for area- preserving simplicial mappings,

    M.-H. Yueh, “Theoretical foundation of the stretch energy minimization for area- preserving simplicial mappings,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1142–1176, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Riemannian gradient descent for spherical area- preserving mappings,

    M. Sutti and M. H. Yueh, “Riemannian gradient descent for spherical area- preserving mappings,”AIMS Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 19414–19445, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Convergent authalic energy minimization for disk area-preserving parameterizations,

    S.-Y. Liu and M.-H. Yueh, “Convergent authalic energy minimization for disk area-preserving parameterizations,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 100, no. 2, p. 43, 2024. 26

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Spherical area-preserving parameterization via energy minimization,

    S.-Y. Liu and M.-H. Yueh, “Spherical area-preserving parameterization via energy minimization,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 207–235, 2026

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    A local/global approach to mesh parameterization,

    L. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Xu, C. Gotsman, and S. J. Gortler, “A local/global approach to mesh parameterization,”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1495–1504, 2008

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    A novel local/global approach to spherical parameterization,

    Z. Wang, Z. Luo, J. Zhang, and E. Saucan, “A novel local/global approach to spherical parameterization,”Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 329, pp. 294–306, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Bijective density-equalizing quasiconformal map for multiply connected open surfaces,

    Z. Lyu, G. P. T. Choi, and L. M. Lui, “Bijective density-equalizing quasiconformal map for multiply connected open surfaces,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 706–755, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Hemispheroidal parameterization and harmonic decomposition of simply connected open surfaces,

    G. P. T. Choi and M. Shaqfa, “Hemispheroidal parameterization and harmonic decomposition of simply connected open surfaces,”Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 461, p. 116455, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Lehto,Quasiconformal mappings in the plane, vol

    O. Lehto,Quasiconformal mappings in the plane, vol. 126. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1973

    work page 1973

  36. [36]

    F. P. Gardiner and N. Lakic,Quasiconformal Teichm¨ uller theory, vol. 76. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    L. V. Ahlfors,Lectures on quasiconformal mappings, vol. 38. American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Computing extremal quasiconformal maps,

    O. Weber, A. Myles, and D. Zorin, “Computing extremal quasiconformal maps,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1679–1689, 2012

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Planar morphometry, shear and optimal quasi- conformal mappings,

    G. W. Jones and L. Mahadevan, “Planar morphometry, shear and optimal quasi- conformal mappings,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 469, no. 2153, p. 20120653, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Landmark-and intensity-based registration with large deformations via quasi-conformal maps,

    K. C. Lam and L. M. Lui, “Landmark-and intensity-based registration with large deformations via quasi-conformal maps,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2364–2392, 2014

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Data-driven quasi-conformal morphodynamic flows,

    S. Mosleh, G. P. T. Choi, and L. Mahadevan, “Data-driven quasi-conformal morphodynamic flows,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 481, no. 2314, p. 20240527, 2025. 27

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Local versus global in quasi-conformal mapping for medical imaging,

    E. Saucan, E. Appleboim, E. Barak-Shimron, R. Lev, and Y. Y. Zeevi, “Local versus global in quasi-conformal mapping for medical imaging,”Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 293–311, 2008

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Supine and prone colon registration using quasi-conformal mapping,

    W. Zeng, J. Marino, K. C. Gurijala, X. Gu, and A. Kaufman, “Supine and prone colon registration using quasi-conformal mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1348–1357, 2010

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Registration for 3D surfaces with large deformations using quasi-conformal curvature flow,

    W. Zeng and X. D. Gu, “Registration for 3D surfaces with large deformations using quasi-conformal curvature flow,” inCVPR 2011, pp. 2457–2464, IEEE, 2011

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Teichm¨ uller mapping (T-map) and its applications to landmark matching registration,

    L. M. Lui, K. C. Lam, S.-T. Yau, and X. Gu, “Teichm¨ uller mapping (T-map) and its applications to landmark matching registration,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 391–426, 2014

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Fast disk conformal parameterization of simply- connected open surfaces,

    P. T. Choi and L. M. Lui, “Fast disk conformal parameterization of simply- connected open surfaces,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1065– 1090, 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Fast ellipsoidal conformal and quasi-conformal parameterization of genus-0 closed surfaces,

    G. P. T. Choi, “Fast ellipsoidal conformal and quasi-conformal parameterization of genus-0 closed surfaces,”Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 447, p. 115888, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Recent developments of surface parameterization methods using quasi-conformal geometry,

    G. P. T. Choi and L. M. Lui, “Recent developments of surface parameterization methods using quasi-conformal geometry,”Handbook of Mathematical Models and Algorithms in Computer Vision and Imaging, pp. 1483–1523, 2023

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Planar morphometrics using Teichm¨ uller maps,

    G. P. T. Choi and L. Mahadevan, “Planar morphometrics using Teichm¨ uller maps,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 474, no. 2217, p. 20170905, 2018

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Tooth morphometry using quasi-conformal theory,

    G. P. T. Choi, H. L. Chan, R. Yong, S. Ranjitkar, A. Brook, G. Townsend, K. Chen, and L. M. Lui, “Tooth morphometry using quasi-conformal theory,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 99, p. 107064, 2020

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Automatic landmark detection and registration of brain cortical surfaces via quasi-conformal geometry and convolutional neural networks,

    Y. Guo, Q. Chen, G. P. T. Choi, and L. M. Lui, “Automatic landmark detection and registration of brain cortical surfaces via quasi-conformal geometry and convolutional neural networks,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 163, p. 107185, 2023. 28

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Restoration of atmospheric turbulence- distorted images via RPCA and quasiconformal maps,

    C. P. Lau, Y. H. Lai, and L. M. Lui, “Restoration of atmospheric turbulence- distorted images via RPCA and quasiconformal maps,”Inverse Problems, vol. 35, no. 7, p. 074002, 2019

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Ellipsoidal density-equalizing map for genus-0 closed surfaces,

    Z. Lyu, L. M. Lui, and G. P. T. Choi, “Ellipsoidal density-equalizing map for genus-0 closed surfaces,”Advances in Computational Mathematics, in press

    work page

  54. [54]

    Low-rank parameterization of planar domains for isogeometric analysis,

    M. Pan, F. Chen, and W. Tong, “Low-rank parameterization of planar domains for isogeometric analysis,”Computer Aided Geometric Design, vol. 63, pp. 1–16, 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Constructing planar domain parameterization with HB- splines via quasi-conformal mapping,

    M. Pan and F. Chen, “Constructing planar domain parameterization with HB- splines via quasi-conformal mapping,”Computer Aided Geometric Design, vol. 97, p. 102133, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    G1-smooth planar parame- terization of complex domains for isogeometric analysis,

    M. Pan, R. Zou, W. Tong, Y. Guo, and F. Chen, “G1-smooth planar parame- terization of complex domains for isogeometric analysis,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 417, p. 116330, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Texture map and video compression using Beltrami representation,

    L. M. Lui, K. C. Lam, T. W. Wong, and X. Gu, “Texture map and video compression using Beltrami representation,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1880–1902, 2013

    work page 1902

  58. [58]

    TEMPO: feature-endowed Te- ichm¨ uller extremal mappings of point clouds,

    T. W. Meng, G. P.-T. Choi, and L. M. Lui, “TEMPO: feature-endowed Te- ichm¨ uller extremal mappings of point clouds,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sci- ences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1922–1962, 2016

    work page 1922

  59. [59]

    Efficient conformal parameterization of multiply-connected surfaces using quasi-conformal theory,

    G. P. T. Choi, “Efficient conformal parameterization of multiply-connected surfaces using quasi-conformal theory,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 87, no. 3, p. 70, 2021. 29

    work page 2021