Relating Mahler measures and Dirichlet L-values: new evidence for Chinburg's conjectures
Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 07:08 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Chinburg's conjectures on Mahler measures and L-values gain 26 new numerical examples.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
For many more conductors f, there exist integral bivariate polynomials P such that the Mahler measure m(P) equals a rational multiple of L'(χ_{-f}, -1), and similarly for rational functions in the weak form. The authors' method locates these examples systematically and proves the weak version under relaxed coefficient conditions.
What carries the argument
The Mahler measure m(P) of a bivariate polynomial or rational function P, which is shown to equal a multiple of the L-derivative through explicit construction and numerical verification.
Load-bearing premise
That the numerically observed equalities between Mahler measures and L-values are exact rather than approximate due to limited precision or undetected relations.
What would settle it
A high-precision computation showing that for one of the new examples, m(P) differs from the predicted multiple of L' by more than floating-point error, or finding a conductor where no matching P exists after exhaustive search.
read the original abstract
Let $\chi_{-f}$ be the odd quadratic Dirichlet character of conductor $f$, and let $\mathrm{m}(P)$ denote the Mahler measure of a polynomial $P$. In 1984, Chinburg conjectured that for any such $\chi_{-f}$ there exist an integral bivariate rational function $P$ (and, in the strong form, an integral polynomial) such that $\mathrm{m}(P)$ is a rational multiple of $L'(\chi_{-f},-1)$. The strong form of the conjecture was previously known to hold for $18$ values of $f$. We double the number of numerical examples, giving $8$ new instances of the strong and $18$ new instances of the weak conjecture. Our examples arise from an explicit approach, which also captures almost all of the previously known results, and is based on work of Boyd and Rodriguez-Villegas. Moreover, we prove Chinburg's weak conjecture if we allow cyclotomic coefficients.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims to double the known numerical support for Chinburg's conjectures by exhibiting 8 new instances of the strong form and 18 new instances of the weak form, in which the Mahler measure m(P) of an explicitly constructed integral polynomial (or rational function) equals a rational multiple of L'(χ_{-f}, -1) for odd quadratic characters χ_{-f}. These examples are obtained via a search procedure modeled on the work of Boyd and Rodriguez-Villegas. In addition, the paper supplies a rigorous proof of the weak conjecture when the polynomials are permitted to have cyclotomic coefficients.
Significance. If the reported numerical matches are exact, the work substantially enlarges the body of evidence for both forms of the conjecture and demonstrates that the Boyd–Rodriguez-Villegas search recovers nearly all previously known cases. The separate algebraic proof for the cyclotomic-coefficient variant constitutes a genuine advance that is independent of the numerical search and may serve as a template for further progress.
major comments (2)
- [§4] §4 (New numerical examples): The 26 asserted new instances rest on high-precision floating-point agreement between m(P) and r L'(χ_{-f},-1). No effective lower bound on |m(P) - r L'(χ,-1)| (for example via Baker-type theorems on linear forms in logarithms) is supplied to convert the numerical match into a rigorous proof of equality. This gap is load-bearing for the claim that these are genuine instances of the conjectures rather than close approximations.
- [§5] §5 (Cyclotomic-coefficient proof): The derivation correctly invokes standard properties of cyclotomic polynomials and L-functions, but the manuscript should explicitly record that the argument does not rely on any numerical verification step, thereby confirming its independence from the search procedure used for the new examples.
minor comments (2)
- [Introduction] Introduction: The citation to Boyd and Rodriguez-Villegas should include the precise title, journal, and year rather than a generic reference.
- [Table 1] Table of examples: For each new f, list the explicit polynomial P together with the rational multiplier r so that readers can reproduce the Mahler-measure computation independently.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of the manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: §4 (New numerical examples): The 26 asserted new instances rest on high-precision floating-point agreement between m(P) and r L'(χ_{-f},-1). No effective lower bound on |m(P) - r L'(χ,-1)| (for example via Baker-type theorems on linear forms in logarithms) is supplied to convert the numerical match into a rigorous proof of equality. This gap is load-bearing for the claim that these are genuine instances of the conjectures rather than close approximations.
Authors: We agree that the 26 new instances are supported by high-precision numerical agreement rather than a rigorous proof of equality, since no effective lower bounds (e.g., via Baker-type theorems) are supplied. This approach follows the standard practice in the literature on Chinburg's conjectures, as in the foundational work of Boyd and Rodriguez-Villegas, where such numerical evidence is accepted as support for new instances. We have revised the manuscript to clarify explicitly that these are numerical instances providing evidence for the conjectures, not proven equalities. Deriving rigorous proofs for these specific cases via lower bounds on linear forms in logarithms is a substantial open problem and lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial
-
Referee: §5 (Cyclotomic-coefficient proof): The derivation correctly invokes standard properties of cyclotomic polynomials and L-functions, but the manuscript should explicitly record that the argument does not rely on any numerical verification step, thereby confirming its independence from the search procedure used for the new examples.
Authors: We thank the referee for this helpful suggestion. We have added an explicit statement in the revised Section 5 noting that the proof relies solely on algebraic properties of cyclotomic polynomials and L-functions and is entirely independent of the numerical search procedure and any floating-point verification. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: numerical matches and proof use independent definitions and external prior work
full rationale
The paper computes Mahler measures m(P) and L'(χ_{-f}, -1) directly from their standard definitions for candidate polynomials found via an explicit search method based on external prior work (Boyd and Rodriguez-Villegas). The new instances are reported as numerical agreements, and the proof of the weak conjecture under cyclotomic coefficients invokes only standard properties of cyclotomic polynomials and Dirichlet L-functions. No equation or claim reduces the asserted equality to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central results remain independent of the target conjecture itself.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Mahler measure of a polynomial equals the integral of log |P| over the unit torus
- standard math Dirichlet L-function L(χ,s) has a meromorphic continuation and functional equation
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M.-J. Bertin and M. Mehrabdollahei,An exact family of bivariate polynomials and Variants of Chinburg’s Conjectures, arXiv:2407.20634, 22 pp., 2025. To appear in Annales mathématiques du Québec
-
[2]
D. W. Boyd,Kronecker’s theorem and Lehmer’s problem for polynomials in several variables, J. Number Theory13(1981), no. 1, 116–121
work page 1981
-
[3]
D. W. Boyd,Mahler’s measure and special values of𝐿-functions, Experiment. Math.7(1998), no. 1, 37–82
work page 1998
-
[4]
D. W. Boyd and F. Rodriguez-Villegas,Mahler’s measure and the dilogarithm. I, Canad. J. Math.54(2002), no. 3, 468–492
work page 2002
-
[5]
D. W. Boyd and F. Rodriguez-Villegas,Mahler’s Measure and the Dilogarithm (II), arXiv:math/0308041, 37 pp., with an appendix by N. M. Dunfield, 2005
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[6]
F.BrunaultandW.Zudilin,ManyvariationsofMahlermeasures—alastingsymphony,AustralianMathemat- ical Society Lecture Series28, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020
work page 2020
-
[7]
T.Chinburg,Mahlermeasuresandderivativesof𝐿-functionsatnon-positiveintegers,unpublishedmanuscript, 9 pp., 1984
work page 1984
-
[8]
Deninger,Deligne periods of mixed motives,𝐾-theory and the entropy of certainZ𝑛-actions, J
C. Deninger,Deligne periods of mixed motives,𝐾-theory and the entropy of certainZ𝑛-actions, J. Amer. Math. Soc.10(1997), no. 2, 259–281
work page 1997
-
[9]
A. Guilloux and J. Marché,Volume function and Mahler measure of exact polynomials, Compos. Math.157 (2021), no. 4, 809–834
work page 2021
- [10]
-
[11]
H. Liu, and H. Qin,Code for Mahler measure of polynomials defining genus 2 and 3 curves,https: //github.com/liuhangsnnu/mahler-measure-of-genus-2-and-3-curves/, accessed March 19th, 2026
work page 2026
-
[12]
Maillot,Géométrie d’Arakelov des variétés toriques et fibrés en droites intégrables, Mém
V. Maillot,Géométrie d’Arakelov des variétés toriques et fibrés en droites intégrables, Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.)80(2000)
work page 2000
-
[13]
G. A. Ray,Relations between Mahler’s measure and values of𝐿-series, Canad. J. Math.39(1987), no. 3, 694–732
work page 1987
-
[14]
C. J. Smyth,A Kronecker-type theorem for complex polynomials in several variables, Canad. Math. Bull.24 (1981), no. 4, 447–452
work page 1981
-
[15]
Bordeaux),PARI/GP version2.17.2, 2025
The PARI Group (Univ. Bordeaux),PARI/GP version2.17.2, 2025. Available athttp://pari.math. u-bordeaux.fr/
work page 2025
-
[16]
Vandervelde,The Mahler measure of parametrizable polynomials, J
S. Vandervelde,The Mahler measure of parametrizable polynomials, J. Number Theory128(2008), no. 8, 2231–2250
work page 2008
-
[17]
Zudilin,Apéry limits and Mahler measures, arXiv:2109.12972, 6 pp., 2021
W. Zudilin,Apéry limits and Mahler measures, arXiv:2109.12972, 6 pp., 2021. DH: Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus 80.010, 3508 TA Utrecht, Nederland Email address:d.p.t.hokken@uu.nl MM: Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany Email address:mehrabdollahei@mpim-bonn.mpg.de BR: Département de mathématiques...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.