Reconciling Latent Variables and Networks: Exploring and extending the Psychometric-Toolbox

Augustin Kelava; Kevin Kistermann; Vivato V. Andriamiarana

arxiv: 2603.26116 · v2 · pith:YJTAXBSKnew · submitted 2026-03-27 · 📊 stat.ME · stat.AP

Reconciling Latent Variables and Networks: Exploring and extending the Psychometric-Toolbox

Kevin Kistermann , Vivato V. Andriamiarana , Augustin Kelava This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ME stat.AP

keywords network psychometricslatent variablesIRTSEMGLMpsychometric toolboxmethodological connectionsreview synthesis

0 comments

The pith

Reviewing connections between network psychometrics and classical models like IRT, SEM, and GLM extends the psychometric toolbox and fosters collaboration across fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews links established between network psychometrics and classical psychometric models such as item response theory, structural equation modeling, and generalized linear models, as well as approaches from other research fields. It synthesizes these through an exploratory literature search and presents the results in a visual format to highlight methodological commonalities. A sympathetic reader would care because this suggests psychometrics can incorporate useful statistical methods developed elsewhere to address similar problems. The authors argue that recognizing these ties can promote collaboration among traditionally separate fields and allow a clearer split between creating new methods and implementing them in practical software. This perspective could also support fresh empirical work and help address longstanding questions about psychometric constructs and psychological phenomena.

Core claim

The authors review and advance connections between network psychometrics and classical models including IRT, SEM, and GLM, along with methods from other domains. They present a visual synthesis of these links and argue that incorporating methodologies from outside psychometrics can broaden the available tools, render development more systematic, and enable a division of labor between theoretical work and software implementation for empirical use.

What carries the argument

Exploratory literature search combined with visual synthesis to identify and display methodological commonalities between network models and classical latent variable frameworks.

If this is right

Incorporating statistical methodologies developed in other research domains to address similar problems in psychometrics.
Fostering collaboration across research fields that have traditionally remained largely independent.
Rendering methodological development more systematic and goal-directed.
Enabling a meaningful division of labor between the development of statistical methodology and its practical implementation for empirical research through software tools.
Providing new opportunities for empirical research and contributing to reconciliation with conceptual issues concerning psychometric constructs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Hybrid analysis approaches that combine network structures with latent variable components could emerge as practical extensions for modeling complex psychological data.
Software implementations might eventually automate the selection or integration of methods based on the commonalities identified in the synthesis.
Similar reconciliation efforts could apply to adjacent areas such as educational testing or clinical assessment tools.
The visual presentation format may encourage further mapping of connections that the initial review left unexplored.

Load-bearing premise

That an exploratory literature search combined with visual synthesis is sufficient to accurately identify and extend all relevant connections between network psychometrics and classical models without missing key prior work or introducing selection bias.

What would settle it

A broader literature search that uncovers major overlooked connections or prior developments that change the synthesized picture of how these models relate, or an empirical application where the proposed toolbox extensions fail to improve analysis outcomes compared to existing approaches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.26116 by Augustin Kelava, Kevin Kistermann, Vivato V. Andriamiarana.

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: When estimating the model with mlVAR(...) and plotting the three networks for both groups in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: When applied to the dataset, there actually seems to be interesting patterns for some individuals, but for others this is not the case, at least for the same ϵ (see RecurrenceAnalysis.ipynb). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Statistical Models (1) Item Response Theory (IRT) (1) R-Package ’irt’ (de Ayala, 2009; Embretson & Reise, 2013; Rasch, 1960; Reckase, 2009; van der Linden, 2018) (2) Latent/Residual Network Modeling (LNM/RNM) R-Package ’lvnet’ (Epskamp, Rhemtulla, & Borsboom, 2017) (3) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) & Path Analysis R-Package ’sem’, R-Package ’lavaan’ (Hoyle, 2023) (4) Normal Linear Factor Model (NLFM)… view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Relations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_1.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Since the introduction of network psychometrics, several connections to statistical models in "classical" psychometrics (i.e., IRT, SEM, GLM) as well as to approaches from other research fields have been established. In this paper, these developments have been reviewed and synthesized and, based on an exploratory literature search, further advanced and presented in an accessible visual format. This perspective opens up promising opportunities to extend the psychometric-toolbox by incorporating and learning from statistical methodologies developed in other research domains, which often address similar or even identical problems. Highlighting these methodological commonalities may also foster collaboration across research fields that have traditionally remained largely independent. Moreover, awareness of these connections may render methodological development more systematic and goal-directed and may enable a meaningful division of labor, for example between the development of statistical methodology and its practical implementation for empirical research through software tools. Finally, these methodological advances provide new opportunities for empirical research and may contribute to a reconciliation with longstanding conceptual issues concerning psychometric constructs and, more broadly, psychological phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Review synthesizing known links between network psychometrics and IRT/SEM/GLM via visuals, but the exploratory search lacks documented criteria.

read the letter

The paper reviews established connections between network psychometrics and classical models such as IRT, SEM, and GLM. It compiles these through an exploratory literature search, presents them in visual form, and suggests how the psychometric toolbox could be extended by drawing on methods from other fields. The authors also note that clearer awareness of these overlaps might support collaboration and more systematic tool development. What the work does reasonably well is organize existing material into an accessible overview and point out practical implications for software and empirical work. The visuals in particular could serve as a quick reference for readers crossing between these areas. The main limitation is the search process itself. An exploratory approach without stated keywords, databases, date ranges, or inclusion rules makes it hard to assess whether key prior reconciliations were missed or whether the selection tilts toward certain developments. That gap directly affects how much weight the claims about new opportunities for collaboration and conceptual reconciliation can carry. This paper is aimed at psychometric methodologists and applied researchers who want a map of how network and latent-variable traditions relate rather than at readers seeking new derivations or large-scale empirical tests. It shows straightforward engagement with the literature and could be worth referee time if the authors add transparency on the search and clarify what the extensions actually add beyond the reviewed material. I would send it for peer review with those points as the main focus.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews connections between network psychometrics and classical psychometric approaches (IRT, SEM, GLM) as well as related methods from other fields. Drawing on an exploratory literature search, it synthesizes these links, extends them, and presents the results in visual form. The central argument is that recognizing these commonalities can enlarge the psychometric toolbox, promote cross-disciplinary collaboration, support more systematic methodological work, enable division of labor between theory and software implementation, and open new avenues for empirical research while addressing longstanding conceptual questions about psychometric constructs.

Significance. A thorough and balanced synthesis of these methodological overlaps could usefully bridge research communities that have developed in parallel, potentially accelerating the transfer of techniques for handling latent structures, network representations, and measurement models. The visual extensions and forward-looking discussion of collaboration and software tools are constructive if the underlying literature mapping is reliable. The absence of a documented search protocol, however, leaves open the possibility that important prior reconciliations have been overlooked, which would reduce the paper’s utility as a foundation for future integrative work.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract (and any methods or supplementary search description): the synthesis and visual extensions rest on an exploratory literature search, yet no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening process are reported. Without these details it is impossible to evaluate whether the identified connections are representative or whether selection bias has shaped the claimed reconciliation; this directly affects the load-bearing assertion that the work opens “promising opportunities to extend the psychometric-toolbox.”

minor comments (1)

[Introduction] Clarify in the introduction or a dedicated section how the visual format was constructed (e.g., which software or diagramming conventions were used) so that readers can reproduce or extend the diagrams.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and balanced review, which recognizes the manuscript's aim to synthesize connections between network psychometrics and classical approaches while highlighting opportunities for cross-domain extensions. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve transparency.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and any methods or supplementary search description): the synthesis and visual extensions rest on an exploratory literature search, yet no search strings, databases, date ranges, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening process are reported. Without these details it is impossible to evaluate whether the identified connections are representative or whether selection bias has shaped the claimed reconciliation; this directly affects the load-bearing assertion that the work opens “promising opportunities to extend the psychometric-toolbox.”

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on methodological transparency. The search underlying the synthesis was exploratory rather than systematic, with the goal of identifying and visually extending prominent, established links across psychometrics and related fields rather than exhaustively cataloguing every possible connection. In the revised version we have added a concise 'Literature Search Approach' subsection (placed after the abstract and before the main synthesis) that describes the process: keyword searches were conducted in Google Scholar using combinations such as 'network psychometrics AND latent variable models', 'IRT network equivalence', 'SEM and graphical models', and 'psychometric networks and factor models', with emphasis on publications from approximately 2010 onward that explicitly discuss overlaps, equivalences, or extensions. Initial screening was performed on titles and abstracts, followed by forward and backward citation checks on key papers. No formal PRISMA protocol or pre-registered inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, as the intent was illustrative synthesis rather than meta-analytic completeness. This documentation now allows readers to assess the scope and potential biases while preserving the paper's core argument that the identified commonalities open avenues for extending the psychometric toolbox. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review paper synthesizes external literature without self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review and visual synthesis paper that reviews established connections between network psychometrics and classical models (IRT, SEM, GLM) drawn from an exploratory search of external sources. It advances no new equations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions within its own framework that could reduce to its inputs by construction. The central claims about fostering cross-field collaboration and extending the psychometric toolbox rest on the reviewed external developments rather than any self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of results as novel derivations. No load-bearing step equates a claimed output to a fitted input or prior self-work by definition, making the synthesis self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on background assumptions from psychometrics and statistics literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. The synthesis depends on the validity of prior connections established in the cited works.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Psychometric constructs can be equivalently represented through both latent variable models and network structures.
Invoked in the abstract when discussing reconciliation of latent variables and networks.
domain assumption Methodological commonalities across independent research fields can be identified through literature search and visual synthesis.
Central to the paper's approach of extending the psychometric toolbox.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1353 out tokens · 51384 ms · 2026-05-19T17:17:58.446891+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

exploratory literature search... diagram of relations between statistical models... IRT and the Ising Model... GGM... VAR... GIMME... Recurrence Plot & Network
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Formal equivalences between the IM and certain IRT models... GGM reparameterization... Latent Network Modeling (LNM)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

J., & Zacharias, H

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20890-5 Altenbuchinger, M., Weihs, A., Quackenbush, J., Grabe, H. J., & Zacharias, H. U. (2020). Gaussian and mixed graphical models as (multi-)omics data analysis tools. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms,1863(6), 194418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194418 Anderson, C. J., & Vermunt, J. ...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20890-5 2020
[2]

56 Cabello, J

https://doi.org/10.1214/23-SS145 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 - THIS PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PEER REVIEWED. 56 Cabello, J. G. (2022). Time-dynamic markov random fields for price outcome prediction in the presence of lobbying.Applied Intelligence,52(4), 3846–3866. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10489-021-02599-6 Cai, H. (2017). A note on jointly modeling edges and node att...

work page doi:10.1214/23-ss145 2026
[3]

https://doi.org/10.2307/2346482 Cox, D., & Wermuth, N. (2002). On some models for multivariate binary variables parallel in complexity with the multivariate gaussian distribution.Biometrika,89(2), 462–

work page doi:10.2307/2346482 2002
[4]

https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/89.2.462 Cramer, A. O. J., van Borkulo, C. D., Giltay, E. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Kendler, K. S., Scheffer, M., & Borsboom, D. (2016). Major depression as a complex dynamic system.PLOS ONE,11(12), e0167490. https ://doi . org/10 . 1371/journal . pone . 0167490 Crawford, C. M., Park, J. J., Chow, S.-M., Ernst, A. F., Pipi...

work page doi:10.1093/biomet/89.2.462 2016
[5]

Curtiss, J

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721005183. Curtiss, J. E., Pinaire, M., Fulford, D., McNally, R. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2022). Temporal and contemporaneous network structures of affect and physical activity in emotional disorders.Journal of affective disorders,315, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jad.2022.07.061 Das, R., & Soylu, M. (2023). A key revie...

work page doi:10.1017/s0033291721005183 2022
[6]

J., & Nelson, J

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001401000836 Gibberd, A. J., & Nelson, J. D. B. (2017). Regularized estimation of piecewise constant gaussian graphical models: The group-fused graphical lasso.Journal of Computa- tional and Graphical Statistics,26(3), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600. 2017.1302340 Gilbert, J. B., Domingue, B. W., & Kim, J. S. (2025)....

work page doi:10.1142/s0218001401000836 2017
[7]

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1640103 Hamaker, E. L. (2025). Analysis of intensive longitudinal data: Putting psychological pro- cesses in perspective.Annual review of clinical psychology,21(1), 379–405. https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-022947 Hamilton, J. D. (1994).Time series analysis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/ ...

work page doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1640103 2019
[8]

Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data

https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1898410 Jacobs, P. A., & Lewis, P. A. W. (1978). Discrete time series generated by mixtures. i: Correlational and runs properties.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological),40(1), 94–105. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984870 Jia, C.-X., & Liu, R.-R. (2025). Cascading dynamics in double-layer hy...

work page doi:10.1080/01621459.2021.1898410 2021
[9]

https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1555692 Kelava, A., Kilian, P., Glaesser, J., Merk, S., & Brandt, H. (2022). Forecasting intra- individual changes of affective states taking into account inter-individual differ- ences using intensive longitudinal data from a university student dropout study in math.Psychometrika,87(2), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.10...

work page doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1555692 2018
[10]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.007 Li, Y ., Wood, J., Ji, L., Chow, S.-M., & Oravecz, Z. (2022). Fitting multilevel vector au- toregressive models in stan, jags, and mplus.Structural Equation Modeling: A Mul- tidisciplinary Journal,29(3), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021. 1911657 Li, Y ., Xu, X., & Li, J. (2018). High-dimensional s...

work page doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.007 2023
[11]

beyond g

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02471-8 Marken, R. S. (2025). Behavioral illusions as obstacles to a science of purpose and how to get around them.Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,63, 101507. https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101507 Marsman, M., Borsboom, D., Kruis, J., Epskamp, S., van Bork, R., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Ma...

work page doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02471-8 2025
[12]

https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1437735 Muolo, R., Giambagli, L., Nakao, H., Fanelli, D., & Carletti, T. (2024). Turing patterns on discrete topologies: From networks to higher-order structures.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,480(2302). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0235 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 -...

work page doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1437735 2018
[13]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 Ploeger, A., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Hartelman, P. A. I. (2002). Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion.Psychonomic bulletin& review,9(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196255 Porter, M., & Gleeson, J. (2016).Dynamical systems on networks(V ol. 4). Springer Inter- n...

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 2019
[14]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0726-0 Reckase, M. D. (2009).Multidimensional item response theory. Springer New York. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89976-3 Renjaän, D., Vervoort, L., Ha, T., Hasselman, F., & Otten, R. (2026). Emotion coupling across socialization contexts in adolescence: Differences in parent-child and peer interactions.Developme...

work page doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0726-0 2009
[15]

https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.59 Uhler, C. (2017). Gaussian graphical models: An algebraic and geometric perspective. http: //arxiv.org/pdf/1707.04345v1 Ulitzsch, E., Khanna, S., Rhemtulla, M., & Domingue, B. W. (2023). A graph theory based similarity metric enables comparison of subpopulation psychometric net- works.Psychological methods. https://doi.o...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.2333/bhmk.29.59 2017
[16]

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842 van der Maas, H. L. J., Kan, K.-J., Marsman, M., & Stevenson, C. E. (2017). Network models for cognitive development and intelligence.Journal of Intelligence,5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020016 van der Maas, H. L. J., Kolstein, R., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Sudden transitions in atti- tudes.Soci...

work page doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842 2017
[17]

F., Burger, J., Reichert, J., Scholten, S., & Klintwall, L

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.101 V ogel, F., Blanken, T. F., Burger, J., Reichert, J., Scholten, S., & Klintwall, L. (2025). How perceived causal networks can complement case conceptualization, diagnos- tic classification, and data-based networks: An introduction to a method for con- structing personalized networks.Journal of psychopathology and ...

work page doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.101 2025
[18]

83 Waller, N

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1938959 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 - THIS PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PEER REVIEWED. 83 Waller, N. G. (2023). Breaking our silence on factor score indeterminacy.Journal of Ed- ucational and Behavioral Statistics,48(2), 244–261. https :/ /doi . org/10 . 3102/ 10769986221128810 Wallot, S. (2019). Multidimensional cross-recurrence qua...

work page doi:10.1080/00273171.2021.1938959 2021
[19]

https://doi.org/10.1214/23-BA1364 Zhang, S., & Chen, Y . (2024). A note on ising network analysis with missing data.Psy- chometrika,89(4), 1186–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09985-2 Zhao, F., Ye, M., & Huang, S.-L. (2021). Exact recovery of stochastic block model by ising model.Entropy,23(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010065 Zheng, C., Huang, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1214/23-ba1364 2024

[1] [1]

J., & Zacharias, H

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20890-5 Altenbuchinger, M., Weihs, A., Quackenbush, J., Grabe, H. J., & Zacharias, H. U. (2020). Gaussian and mixed graphical models as (multi-)omics data analysis tools. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms,1863(6), 194418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194418 Anderson, C. J., & Vermunt, J. ...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20890-5 2020

[2] [2]

56 Cabello, J

https://doi.org/10.1214/23-SS145 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 - THIS PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PEER REVIEWED. 56 Cabello, J. G. (2022). Time-dynamic markov random fields for price outcome prediction in the presence of lobbying.Applied Intelligence,52(4), 3846–3866. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10489-021-02599-6 Cai, H. (2017). A note on jointly modeling edges and node att...

work page doi:10.1214/23-ss145 2026

[3] [3]

https://doi.org/10.2307/2346482 Cox, D., & Wermuth, N. (2002). On some models for multivariate binary variables parallel in complexity with the multivariate gaussian distribution.Biometrika,89(2), 462–

work page doi:10.2307/2346482 2002

[4] [4]

https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/89.2.462 Cramer, A. O. J., van Borkulo, C. D., Giltay, E. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Kendler, K. S., Scheffer, M., & Borsboom, D. (2016). Major depression as a complex dynamic system.PLOS ONE,11(12), e0167490. https ://doi . org/10 . 1371/journal . pone . 0167490 Crawford, C. M., Park, J. J., Chow, S.-M., Ernst, A. F., Pipi...

work page doi:10.1093/biomet/89.2.462 2016

[5] [5]

Curtiss, J

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721005183. Curtiss, J. E., Pinaire, M., Fulford, D., McNally, R. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2022). Temporal and contemporaneous network structures of affect and physical activity in emotional disorders.Journal of affective disorders,315, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jad.2022.07.061 Das, R., & Soylu, M. (2023). A key revie...

work page doi:10.1017/s0033291721005183 2022

[6] [6]

J., & Nelson, J

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001401000836 Gibberd, A. J., & Nelson, J. D. B. (2017). Regularized estimation of piecewise constant gaussian graphical models: The group-fused graphical lasso.Journal of Computa- tional and Graphical Statistics,26(3), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600. 2017.1302340 Gilbert, J. B., Domingue, B. W., & Kim, J. S. (2025)....

work page doi:10.1142/s0218001401000836 2017

[7] [7]

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1640103 Hamaker, E. L. (2025). Analysis of intensive longitudinal data: Putting psychological pro- cesses in perspective.Annual review of clinical psychology,21(1), 379–405. https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-022947 Hamilton, J. D. (1994).Time series analysis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/ ...

work page doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1640103 2019

[8] [8]

Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data

https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1898410 Jacobs, P. A., & Lewis, P. A. W. (1978). Discrete time series generated by mixtures. i: Correlational and runs properties.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological),40(1), 94–105. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984870 Jia, C.-X., & Liu, R.-R. (2025). Cascading dynamics in double-layer hy...

work page doi:10.1080/01621459.2021.1898410 2021

[9] [9]

https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1555692 Kelava, A., Kilian, P., Glaesser, J., Merk, S., & Brandt, H. (2022). Forecasting intra- individual changes of affective states taking into account inter-individual differ- ences using intensive longitudinal data from a university student dropout study in math.Psychometrika,87(2), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.10...

work page doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1555692 2018

[10] [10]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.007 Li, Y ., Wood, J., Ji, L., Chow, S.-M., & Oravecz, Z. (2022). Fitting multilevel vector au- toregressive models in stan, jags, and mplus.Structural Equation Modeling: A Mul- tidisciplinary Journal,29(3), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021. 1911657 Li, Y ., Xu, X., & Li, J. (2018). High-dimensional s...

work page doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.007 2023

[11] [11]

beyond g

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02471-8 Marken, R. S. (2025). Behavioral illusions as obstacles to a science of purpose and how to get around them.Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,63, 101507. https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101507 Marsman, M., Borsboom, D., Kruis, J., Epskamp, S., van Bork, R., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Ma...

work page doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02471-8 2025

[12] [12]

https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1437735 Muolo, R., Giambagli, L., Nakao, H., Fanelli, D., & Carletti, T. (2024). Turing patterns on discrete topologies: From networks to higher-order structures.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,480(2302). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0235 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 -...

work page doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1437735 2018

[13] [13]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 Ploeger, A., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Hartelman, P. A. I. (2002). Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion.Psychonomic bulletin& review,9(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196255 Porter, M., & Gleeson, J. (2016).Dynamical systems on networks(V ol. 4). Springer Inter- n...

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 2019

[14] [14]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0726-0 Reckase, M. D. (2009).Multidimensional item response theory. Springer New York. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89976-3 Renjaän, D., Vervoort, L., Ha, T., Hasselman, F., & Otten, R. (2026). Emotion coupling across socialization contexts in adolescence: Differences in parent-child and peer interactions.Developme...

work page doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0726-0 2009

[15] [15]

https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.59 Uhler, C. (2017). Gaussian graphical models: An algebraic and geometric perspective. http: //arxiv.org/pdf/1707.04345v1 Ulitzsch, E., Khanna, S., Rhemtulla, M., & Domingue, B. W. (2023). A graph theory based similarity metric enables comparison of subpopulation psychometric net- works.Psychological methods. https://doi.o...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.2333/bhmk.29.59 2017

[16] [16]

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842 van der Maas, H. L. J., Kan, K.-J., Marsman, M., & Stevenson, C. E. (2017). Network models for cognitive development and intelligence.Journal of Intelligence,5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020016 van der Maas, H. L. J., Kolstein, R., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Sudden transitions in atti- tudes.Soci...

work page doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842 2017

[17] [17]

F., Burger, J., Reichert, J., Scholten, S., & Klintwall, L

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.101 V ogel, F., Blanken, T. F., Burger, J., Reichert, J., Scholten, S., & Klintwall, L. (2025). How perceived causal networks can complement case conceptualization, diagnos- tic classification, and data-based networks: An introduction to a method for con- structing personalized networks.Journal of psychopathology and ...

work page doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.101 2025

[18] [18]

83 Waller, N

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1938959 PREPRINT - 26.03.2026 - THIS PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PEER REVIEWED. 83 Waller, N. G. (2023). Breaking our silence on factor score indeterminacy.Journal of Ed- ucational and Behavioral Statistics,48(2), 244–261. https :/ /doi . org/10 . 3102/ 10769986221128810 Wallot, S. (2019). Multidimensional cross-recurrence qua...

work page doi:10.1080/00273171.2021.1938959 2021

[19] [19]

https://doi.org/10.1214/23-BA1364 Zhang, S., & Chen, Y . (2024). A note on ising network analysis with missing data.Psy- chometrika,89(4), 1186–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09985-2 Zhao, F., Ye, M., & Huang, S.-L. (2021). Exact recovery of stochastic block model by ising model.Entropy,23(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010065 Zheng, C., Huang, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1214/23-ba1364 2024