Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 42 references

Recent advances in modeling and simulation of biological phenomena in crowded and cellular environments

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-22 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New simulation methods now model biological processes inside crowded cells for up to 200 microseconds.

desk verdict This is a review summarizing simulation methods for crowded cellular environments that reaches 200 microseconds in some cases, but it adds little original analysis or critique of the models' limits. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.26974 v2 pith:PWQXHZYA submitted 2026-03-27 q-bio.BM

Apoorva Mathur , Vanessa Regina Miranda , Ariane Nunes-Alves This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.BM
keywords crowdedcellularenvironmentscytoplasmmodelingmolecularsimulationinvivoconditionscomputationalmethodsbiologicalcrowding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews recent computational approaches developed to study biological phenomena under the dense conditions found inside living cells rather than in the dilute solutions typical of lab experiments. It covers the use of protein crowders, inert crowders, and small molecules to recreate crowding effects, along with full models of the cytoplasm. These advances have extended simulation timescales to 200 microseconds, opening the way to observe how molecular interactions and dynamics actually unfold in the cellular environment.

What carries the argument

Computational methods that incorporate protein crowders, inert crowders, and small molecules into models of the cytoplasm to simulate crowded cellular conditions.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements from live cells showing that key reaction rates or molecular diffusion behaviors differ substantially from the outcomes of these crowded simulations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This review shows that recent computational methods for crowded systems, including cytoplasm models built with protein, inert, and small-molecule crowders, have achieved simulation times up to 200 microseconds. The work argues that these techniques move modeling closer to in vivo conditions and therefore hold substantial potential for clarifying how biological processes occur inside cells.

Load-bearing premise

The selected methods and simulations reviewed here are representative of the field and capture the main features of real cellular crowding without major gaps in accuracy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Longer simulation times allow direct observation of slower cellular processes that shorter runs miss.
  • Cytoplasm models can be used to test how crowding alters protein stability and interactions.
  • These approaches provide a route to predict in vivo behavior from in silico data.
  • The field is positioned to integrate crowding effects into routine studies of cellular function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending these methods to include explicit membrane boundaries could connect cytoplasmic simulations to whole-cell models.
  • Comparing the reviewed approaches against single-molecule tracking data from living cells would test their predictive power.
  • Adopting such simulations earlier in drug discovery might flag compounds whose efficacy changes under crowded conditions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of recent computational methods and simulations for studying biological phenomena in crowded and cellular environments. It covers the use of protein crowders, inert crowders, and small molecules to mimic crowding, models of the cytoplasm, development of new methods achieving simulation times up to 200 microseconds, and notes challenges alongside the field's potential to improve understanding of in vivo processes.

Significance. If the reviewed methods are representative, the paper provides a timely overview of technical progress in cellular simulations, particularly the extension to longer timescales such as 200 μs. This could help researchers bridge in vitro and in vivo studies, though its value hinges on balanced coverage of model limitations.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that these simulations improve understanding of in vivo phenomena depends on the reviewed approaches (protein/inert crowders, cytoplasm models) adequately representing cellular heterogeneity and dynamic interactions. The manuscript should include a dedicated critical assessment of how well simplified crowder models address excluded-volume effects, specific binding, and experimental validation to support the in vivo extrapolation.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from one or two concrete examples of the biological phenomena (e.g., protein folding or diffusion) that have been simulated in crowded conditions.
  2. Ensure all cited works in the review are referenced with full bibliographic details for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the recommendation of minor revision. We agree that strengthening the critical perspective on model limitations will improve the manuscript and have revised accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that these simulations improve understanding of in vivo phenomena depends on the reviewed approaches (protein/inert crowders, cytoplasm models) adequately representing cellular heterogeneity and dynamic interactions. The manuscript should include a dedicated critical assessment of how well simplified crowder models address excluded-volume effects, specific binding, and experimental validation to support the in vivo extrapolation.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit critical assessment of the reviewed models' ability to represent cellular conditions. While the original text already notes challenges in the field and the potential for in vivo insights, we acknowledge that a dedicated discussion of limitations is warranted. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (placed after the review of cytoplasm models) that critically evaluates how protein and inert crowder representations capture excluded-volume effects versus specific binding, discusses the extent of experimental validation available for these simplifications, and addresses implications for extrapolating results to heterogeneous cellular environments. This addition will be concise, literature-based, and will not change the overall scope of the review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: literature review with no derivation chain

full rationale

This paper is a survey of existing computational methods for modeling macromolecular crowding in cellular environments. It summarizes prior literature on protein/inert crowders, small-molecule mimics, cytoplasm models, and simulation techniques that achieve up to 200 μs timescales. No original equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are introduced that could reduce to self-definitions or self-citations by construction. All substantive claims are attributed to external publications, rendering the work self-contained as a review without any load-bearing circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review article that does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it summarizes existing work in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recent advances in modeling and simulation of biological phenomena in crowded and cellular environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PWQXHZYA

@misc{pith2026260326974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recent advances in modeling and simulation of biological phenomena in crowded and cellular environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PWQXHZYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.26974}
}
read the original abstract

While experiments and computer simulations to study biological phenomena are usually performed in diluted in vitro conditions, such phenomena happen inside the cell, an environment densely packed with diverse macromolecules. Here, we revise recent computational methods to investigate crowded and cellular environments. Protein crowders, inert crowders and small molecules were used to mimic crowding. Simulations were performed for models of the cytoplasm. New methods were developed to simulate crowded systems, reaching up to 200 microseconds of simulation time. Apart from the challenges, modeling and simulations to investigate biological phenomena inside cells is a growing field, and has a lot of potential to improve our understanding of how such phenomena happen in vivo.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.26974 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simulation length depends on the size of the system and molecular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the effects of macromolecular crowding on proteins and biomolecular condensates. (a) Increasing concentration of crowding agents (pink-blue proteins surrounded by excluded volume in green) generally promotes phase separation, stabilizes proteins, and lowers the diffusion rates of target proteins. (b) Higher interaction between crowder agent and target molecules leads to lower substrate channeling, stabil… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    References and recommended reading

    The authors acknowledge bioicons for the pr eparation of Figure 2, under creative commons licenses CC -BY 3.0/4.0: (Protein_quaternary_structure icon and Protein_colored icon by DBCLS (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), modified 7helix-receptor-membrane icon by Servier (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/); modified biocondensate -con...

    work page

  2. [2]

    J Mol Biol 1991, 222:599–620

    Zimmerman SB, Trach SO: Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 1991, 222:599–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-V

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-v 1991

  3. [3]

    J Chem Inf Model 2024, 64:9063–

    Mathur A, Ghosh R, Nunes-Alves A: Recent Progress in Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecular Crowding and Condensation Inside Cells. J Chem Inf Model 2024, 64:9063–

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01520

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01520

  5. [5]

    PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000694

    McGuffee SR, Elcock AH: Diffusion, Crowding & Protein Stability in a Dynamic Molecular Model of the Bacterial Cytoplasm. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000694

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000694 2010

  6. [6]

    Cell 2024, 187:545–62

    Beck M, Covino R, Hänelt I, Müller-McNicoll M: Understanding the cell: Future views of structural biology. Cell 2024, 187:545–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.017 2024

  7. [7]

    Chem Rev 2024, 124:3932–77

    Grassmann G, Miotto M, Desantis F, Di Rienzo L, Tartaglia GG, Pastore A, Ruocco G, Monti M, Milanetti E: Computational Approaches to Predict Protein–Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments. Chem Rev 2024, 124:3932–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00550. 12

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00550 2024

  8. [8]

    In (Macro)Molecular Crowding

    Coskuner-Weber O, Koca M, Uversky VN: Molecular Crowding by Computational Approaches. In (Macro)Molecular Crowding. Edited by Uversky VN. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025:471–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03370-3_21

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03370-3_21 2025

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    J Phys Chem B 2024, 128:11676–93

    Wozniak S, Feig M: Diffusion and Viscosity in Mixed Protein Solutions. J Phys Chem B 2024, 128:11676–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c06877

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.12.002

    Kompella VPS, Romano MC, Stansfield I, Mancera RL: What determines sub-diffusive behavior in crowded protein solutions? Biophys J 2024, 123:134–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.12.002

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    J Chem Phys 2024, 161:095101

    Singh A, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA: Diffusion of proteins in crowded solutions studied by docking-based modeling. J Chem Phys 2024, 161:095101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0220545

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    J Mol Biol 2025, 437:169085

    Singh A, Tytarenko AM, Ambati VK, Copeland MM, Kundrotas PJ, Kasyanov PO, Feinberg EA, Vakser IA: GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource. J Mol Biol 2025, 437:169085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169085

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, doi:10.1101/2025.01.28.635259

    Dindo M, Metson J, Ren W, Chatzittofi M, Yagi K, Sugita Y, Golestanian R, Laurino P: Enzymes can activate and mobilize the cytoplasmic environment across scales. 2025, doi:10.1101/2025.01.28.635259. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.28.635259

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    J Phys Chem B 2025, 129:11168–82

    Fasihianifard P, Wu KY, Kaushik S, Chang CA: Multiscale Modeling of Enzymatic Efficiency in Multienzyme Complex: Effect of Interenzyme Distance, Crowding Effect and Side Reactions. J Phys Chem B 2025, 129:11168–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c04831

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    Protein Sci 2025, 34:e5235

    Haas‐Neill L, Joron K, Lerner E, Rauscher S: PEG–MCHERRY interactions beyond classical macromolecular crowding. Protein Sci 2025, 34:e5235. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5235

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Protein Sci 2025, 34:e70232

    Rauh AS, Tesei G, Lindorff‐Larsen K: A coarse‐grained model for disordered proteins under crowded conditions. Protein Sci 2025, 34:e70232. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70232

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    axXiv 2025

    Bülow S von, Yasuda I, Cao F, Schulze TK, Trolle AI, Rauh AS, Crehuet R, Lindorff-Larsen K, Tesei G: Software package for simulations using the coarse-grained CALVADOS model. axXiv 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.10408

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    bioRxiv 2024

    Roychowdhury S, Menon S, Mandal N, Mondal J, Chattopadhyay K: Crowder induced conformational fluctuations modulate the phase separation of yeast SUP35 NM domain. bioRxiv 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.610075

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    J Biol Chem 2020, 295:11729–41

    Goett-Zink L, Klocke JL, Bögeholz LAK, Kottke T: In-cell infrared difference spectroscopy of LOV photoreceptors reveals structural responses to light altered in living cells. J Biol Chem 2020, 295:11729–41. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.013091

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    Protein Sci 2025, 34:e70128

    Tahir U, Davis CM: Weak, specific chemical interactions dictate barnase stability in diverse cellular environments. Protein Sci 2025, 34:e70128. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70128

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    eLife 2016, 5:e19274

    Yu I, Mori T, Ando T, Harada R, Jung J, Sugita Y, Feig M: Biomolecular interactions modulate macromolecular structure and dynamics in atomistic model of a bacterial cytoplasm. eLife 2016, 5:e19274. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19274. 13

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Gen Subj 2025, 1869:130798

    Kompella VPS, Romano MC, Stansfield I, Mancera RL: Diffusion properties of transfer RNAs in the yeast cytoplasm under normal and osmotic stress conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Gen Subj 2025, 1869:130798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2025.130798

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    J Phys Chem Lett 2024, 15:940–6

    Samuel Russell PP, Maytin AK, Rickard MM, Russell MC, Pogorelov TV, Gruebele M: Metastable States in the Hinge-Bending Landscape of an Enzyme in an Atomistic Cytoplasm Simulation. J Phys Chem Lett 2024, 15:940–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03134

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Proc Natl Acad Sci 2025, 122:e2414206122

    Samuel Russell PP, Rickard MM, Pogorelov TV, Gruebele M: Enzymes in a human cytoplasm model organize into submetabolon complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2025, 122:e2414206122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414206122

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Curr Res Struct Biol 2024, 7:100121

    Goodsell DS, Autin L: Integrative modeling of JCVI-Syn3A nucleoids with a modular approach. Curr Res Struct Biol 2024, 7:100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crstbi.2023.100121

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    The Biophysicist 2025, 6:37–52

    Wu T, Thornburg ZR, Tan K, Kenkel S, Boppart SA, Bhargava R, Luthey-Schulten Z: Visualizing Cell Structures with Minecraft. The Biophysicist 2025, 6:37–52. https://doi.org/10.35459/tbp.2024.000275

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    Proc Natl Acad Sci 2022, 119:e2210249119

    Vakser IA, Grudinin S, Jenkins NW, Kundrotas PJ, Deeds EJ: Docking-based long timescale simulation of cell-size protein systems at atomic resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2022, 119:e2210249119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210249119

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992, 89:2195–9

    Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA: Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992, 89:2195–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.6.2195

    1992 doi

  21. [29]

    Nat Commun 2024, 15:3370

    Jung J, Tan C, Sugita Y: GENESIS CGDYN: large-scale coarse-grained MD simulation with dynamic load balancing for heterogeneous biomolecular systems. Nat Commun 2024, 15:3370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47654-1

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    J Phys Chem B 2024, 128:6028–48

    Jung J, Yagi K, Tan C, Oshima H, Mori T, Yu I, Matsunaga Y, Kobayashi C, Ito S, Ugarte La Torre D, et al.: GENESIS 2.1: High-Performance Molecular Dynamics Software for Enhanced Sampling and Free-Energy Calculations for Atomistic, Coarse-Grained, and Quantum Mechanics/Molecula...

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    J Comput Chem 2024, 45:498–505

    Yu I, Mori T, Matsuoka D, Surblys D, Sugita Y: SPANA : Spatial decomposition analysis for cellular‐scale molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2024, 45:498–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.27260

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region

    Ugarte La Torre D, Jung J, Sugita Y: Scaling molecular dynamics for large-scale simulation of biological systems on AMD CPU/GPU supercomputers: Lessons from LUMI: Optimizing GENESIS for maximizing the computational efficiency of CPU and GPU kernels on the LUMI supercomputer. I...

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Cell 2026

    Thornburg ZR, Maytin A, Kwon J, Brier TA, Gilbert BR, Fu E, Gao Y-L, Quenneville J, Wu T, Li H, et al.: Bringing the genetically minimal cell to life on a computer in 4D. Cell 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.009. 14

    2026 doi

  26. [34]

    J Phys Chem B 2022, 126:7400–08

    Beck C, Grimaldo M, Lopez H, Da Vela S, Sohmen B, Zhang F, Oettel M, Barrat J-L, Roosen-Runge F, Schreiber F, et al.: Short-Time Transport Properties of Bidisperse Suspensions of Immunoglobulins and Serum Albumins Consistent with a Colloid Physics Picture. J Phys Chem B 2022, ...

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Cell 2019, 176:419–34

    Alberti S, Gladfelter A, Mittag T: Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid- Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates. Cell 2019, 176:419–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    JACS Au 2025, 5:4916–35

    Zhang G, Feng C, Chu X: Repulsive vs Attractive Crowding Distinctly Regulate TDP-43 Condensates through Region-specific Structural Dynamics. JACS Au 2025, 5:4916–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.5c00876

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    eLife 2024, 13:RP95180

    Wasim A, Menon S, Mondal J: Modulation of α-synuclein aggregation amid diverse environmental perturbation. eLife 2024, 13:RP95180. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95180

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    J Bacteriol 2010, 192:4535–40

    Nenninger A, Mastroianni G, Mullineaux CW: Size Dependence of Protein Diffusion in the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2010, 192:4535–40. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00284-10

    2010 doi

  31. [39]

    iScience 2022, 25:105088

    Dey D, Nunes-Alves A, Wade RC, Schreiber G: Diffusion of small molecule drugs is affected by surface interactions and crowder proteins. iScience 2022, 25:105088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105088

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    eLife 2024, 13:RP97255

    Dey D, Marciano S, Poryval A, Groborz O, Wohlrabova L, Slanina T, Schreiber G: Reversing protonation of weakly basic drugs greatly enhances intracellular diffusion and decreases lysosomal sequestration. eLife 2024, 13:RP97255. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97255.3

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Sci Adv 2023, 9:eadg9141

    Wang M, Song X, Chen J, Chen X, Zhang X, Yang Y, Liu Z, Yao L: Intracellular environment can change protein conformational dynamics in cells through weak interactions. Sci Adv 2023, 9:eadg9141. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg9141

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Front Chem 2023, 11:1106495

    Stevens JA, Grünewald F, Van Tilburg PAM, König M, Gilbert BR, Brier TA, Thornburg ZR, Luthey-Schulten Z, Marrink SJ: Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell. Front Chem 2023, 11:1106495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1106495

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 22, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.