Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Releasing the pressure: High-order surface flow discretizations via discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decompositions

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Any incompressible surface flow on BDM elements can be rewritten with only a streamfunction and a few harmonic coefficients, eliminating pressure.

desk verdict Clean high-order BDM Helmholtz-Hodge on surfaces of any topology that removes the pressure saddle-point while keeping exact tangentiality and pointwise div-free structure; solid and ready for referees. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.27714 v2 pith:HX3MKKXE submitted 2026-03-29 math.NA cs.NAmath.DG

Tim Brüers , Christoph Lehrenfeld , Tim van Beeck , Max Wardetzky This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NAmath.DG MSC 65N3065N1276D0558A14
keywords surfaceNavier-StokesHelmholtz-HodgedecompositionstreamfunctionharmonicfieldsBDMfiniteelementsdivergence-freediscretizationpressure-robustness
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

On a triangulated surface of any topology, the divergence-free part of the high-order BDM finite-element space splits exactly into the rotated gradient of a continuous streamfunction plus a finite-dimensional space of discrete harmonic fields whose dimension equals the first Betti number of the surface. Because of that splitting, every incompressible flow problem that lives in the BDM space can be rewritten with only the streamfunction and a handful of harmonic coefficients as unknowns. The resulting formulation stays exactly tangential, pointwise divergence-free and pressure-robust, yet never solves a velocity-pressure saddle-point system. The paper supplies a randomized algorithm that builds an orthonormal harmonic basis in a few sparse solves, together with hybridization and Schur-complement techniques that keep the extra harmonic unknowns cheap. Numerical experiments on a thick trefoil knot and a pierced sculpture surface show that the harmonic component carries the non-contractible circulation that a pure streamfunction cannot represent.

What carries the argument

Discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of the BDM complex (Theorem 3.2): the L2-orthogonal splitting of the divergence-free subspace into rotated continuous streamfunctions of one degree higher and a harmonic complement of dimension b1(M).

What would settle it

Compute dim(H^k_BDM) by linear algebra on a closed genus-g surface for several polynomial degrees k and mesh sizes; if the dimension is not constantly equal to 2g, the central claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The divergence-free BDM subspace of degree k on a triangulated surface admits the L2-orthogonal splitting J^k_BDM = rot(S^{k+1}_0) ⊕ H^k_BDM, where dim(H^k_BDM) equals the first Betti number of the surface. Consequently every incompressible flow discretized in that subspace can be reformulated with a scalar streamfunction and finitely many harmonic coefficients as the only unknowns, eliminating pressure while retaining exact tangentiality, pointwise divergence-freeness and pressure-robustness.

Load-bearing premise

The dimension count that proves the harmonic space has exactly the right size rests on the Euler-Poincaré formula together with the precise degrees-of-freedom counts of the mapped polynomial spaces; if the geometric mapping or boundary conditions change those counts, the topological exactness fails.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a discrete L2-orthogonal Helmholtz–Hodge decomposition for the divergence-free subspace of H(div)-conforming BDM elements of degree k on triangulated surfaces of arbitrary topology: J^k_BDM = rot(S^{k+1}_0) ⊕_L2 H^k_BDM, with dim(H^k_BDM) equal to the first Betti number b1(M) (Theorem 3.2). The proof is by elementary dimension counting that recovers the Euler–Poincaré formula (Appendix B.1). Consequently any incompressible surface flow discretized in this subspace can be rewritten with a continuous streamfunction and finitely many harmonic coefficients as the only unknowns, eliminating the pressure and the saddle-point structure while retaining exact tangentiality, pointwise divergence-freeness and pressure-robustness. A randomized algorithm constructs an L2-orthonormal harmonic basis; hybridization, a Schur-complement treatment of the few harmonic unknowns, and a post-processed pressure reconstruction are described. Numerical experiments for unsteady surface Navier–Stokes on a trefoil knot and a multiply-connected sculpture surface illustrate the method and the physical role of the harmonic component.

Significance. If the discrete splitting holds, the work supplies a structure-preserving, pressure-free high-order method for surface Stokes/Navier–Stokes that inherits all geometric exactness properties of the BDM framework while removing the velocity-pressure saddle point. The dimension count is elementary and topology-exact; the lowest-order RT0 component already carries the full harmonic structure (Remark 3.3). The randomized basis construction, hybridization and Schur treatment of the O(b1) harmonic unknowns are practical, and the numerical illustrations on non-trivial topology make the physical content of the harmonic fields transparent. The approach therefore extends classical streamfunction methods from simply-connected flat domains to surfaces of arbitrary genus in a way that is both theoretically clean and implementable.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3] Section 3.3 and Remark 3.5: the discussion of incomplete decompositions and the obstruction for curved triangulations is interesting but somewhat peripheral; a short forward pointer that the main applications only need the complete splitting of J^k_BDM would help the reader.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1: the hybrid-unknown counts appear in gray parentheses; a one-sentence clarification in the caption that these are the condensed facet unknowns would improve readability.
  3. [Figures 5, 7] Figures 5 and 7: the color scale is stated in the caption but the absolute magnitude of the harmonic component is hard to judge visually; a brief remark on relative L2 norms of u_rot versus u_H at selected times would strengthen the physical interpretation.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “hol(e)y” in the caption of Figure 1, occasional missing spaces around operators). A final copy-edit pass would be beneficial.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: discrete splitting and dim(H)=b1(M) follow from independent DOF counting plus Euler-Poincaré, not from self-referential definitions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 3.2) defines Hk_BDM as the L2-orthogonal complement of rot(Sk+1_0) inside Jk_BDM and then proves dim(Hk_BDM)=b1(M) by an elementary dimension count (Appendix B.1) that uses only the standard DOF tallies for mapped BDM and continuous Lagrange spaces together with the Euler-Poincaré formula. That count is self-contained and does not invoke the continuous Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition or any prior result of the authors as a premise. Continuous background [12] and flat-domain BDM results [29] supply motivation and context but are not load-bearing for the discrete identity. There are no fitted parameters, no data-driven predictions, and no uniqueness theorems imported from the authors that force the splitting. Implementation details (randomized basis, hybridization, Schur complement, pressure reconstruction) and the numerical illustrations are consequences of the algebraic splitting, not inputs to it. The derivation is therefore free of the circular patterns listed in the instructions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on standard finite-element exterior calculus, the continuous surface Helmholtz-Hodge theory of the authors' prior work, and elementary combinatorial topology. No free parameters are fitted; the only new algorithmic entity is the randomized harmonic basis, which is fully specified and has independent probabilistic justification.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Continuous L2-orthogonal Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of H1 vector fields on a C1,1 surface into gradient, rotated streamfunction and harmonic fields of dimension b1(M) (Eq. 11, taken from [12]).
    Used as the continuous model that the discrete complex is required to mimic; invoked throughout Section 3.
  • standard math Euler-Poincaré formula χ(M)=b0-b1+b2 together with b0=1 and b2=δ_Γ,∅ for a connected surface.
    Appears in the dimension-counting proof of Theorem Appendix B.1 that establishes dim(H^k_BDM)=b1(M).
  • domain assumption Shape-regular admissible triangulation of a piecewise-smooth surface with Piola-mapped polynomial spaces of degree k.
    Standard FEM hypothesis needed for the degrees-of-freedom counts and for the inclusion rot(S^{k+1}_0)⊂BDM^k_0.
invented entities (1)
  • Randomized Algorithm 4.1 for an L2-orthonormal basis of the discrete harmonic space H^k_BDM independent evidence
    purpose: Constructs the finite-dimensional harmonic component that cannot be obtained from local streamfunction degrees of freedom.
    The algorithm is fully specified, terminates with probability one after b1(M) successful samples, and is a straightforward adaptation of a known randomized strategy [50]; it does not introduce new physical entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Releasing the pressure: High-order surface flow discretizations via discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decompositions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HX3MKKXE

@misc{pith2026260327714,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Releasing the pressure: High-order surface flow discretizations via discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decompositions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HX3MKKXE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.27714}
}
read the original abstract

We present a discrete Helmholtz--Hodge decomposition for H(div)-conforming Brezzi--Douglas--Marini (BDM) finite elements on triangulated surfaces of arbitrary topology. The divergence-free BDM subspace is split L2-orthogonally into rotated gradients of a continuous streamfunction space and a finite-dimensional space of discrete harmonic fields whose dimension equals the first Betti number of the surface. Consequently, any incompressible flow discretized on this subspace can be reformulated with a scalar streamfunction and finitely many harmonic coefficients as the only unknowns. This eliminates the pressure and the saddle-point structure while ensuring exact tangentiality, pointwise divergence-freeness, and pressure-robustness. We present a randomized algorithm for constructing the harmonic basis and discuss implementation aspects including hybridization, efficient treatment of the harmonic unknowns, and pressure reconstruction. Numerical experiments for unsteady surface Navier--Stokes equations on a trefoil knot and a multiply-connected sculpture surface demonstrate the method and illustrate the physical role of the harmonic velocity component.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stabilized Morley FEM for surface Stokes in stream-function formulation: Optimal convergence via a new geometric estimate

    math.NA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A parameter-free stabilized Morley method for surface Stokes in stream-function form achieves first-order broken-H2 and second-order broken-H1 convergence under H3 regularity, via a new normal-separated geometric estimate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Finite element exterior calculus: from Hodge theory to numerical stability.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47(2):281–354, 2010

    Douglas Arnold, Richard Falk, and Ragnar Winther. Finite element exterior calculus: from Hodge theory to numerical stability.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47(2):281–354, 2010

    2010

  2. [2]

    Arnold.Finite Element Exterior Calculus

    Douglas N. Arnold.Finite Element Exterior Calculus. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications.Acta Numerica, 15:1–155, 2006

    Douglas N Arnold, Richard S Falk, and Ragnar Winther. Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications.Acta Numerica, 15:1–155, 2006

    2006

  4. [4]

    Boffi, F

    D. Boffi, F. Brezzi, and M. Fortin.Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013

    2013

  5. [5]

    A divergence-conforming finite element method for the surface Stokes equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 58(5):2764– 2798, 2020

    Andrea Bonito, Alan Demlow, and Martin Licht. A divergence-conforming finite element method for the surface Stokes equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 58(5):2764– 2798, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Philip Brandner, Thomas Jankuhn, Simon Praetorius, Arnold Reusken, and Axel Voigt. Fi- nite element discretization methods for velocity-pressure and stream function formulations 22 of surface Stokes equations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 44(4):A1807–A1832, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Brenner and Michael Neilan

    Susanne C. Brenner and Michael Neilan. AC0 interior penalty method for a fourth order elliptic singular perturbation problem.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 49(2):869–892, 2011

    2011

  8. [8]

    Brenner and Li-Yeng Sung.C0 interior penalty methods for fourth order elliptic boundary value problems on polygonal domains.Journal of Scientific Computing, 22/23:83–118, 2005

    Susanne C. Brenner and Li-Yeng Sung.C0 interior penalty methods for fourth order elliptic boundary value problems on polygonal domains.Journal of Scientific Computing, 22/23:83–118, 2005

    2005

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Bringmann, Jonas W

    P. Bringmann, Jonas W. Ketteler, and M. Schedensack. Discrete Helmholtz decompositions of piecewise constant and piecewise affine vector and tensor fields.Found. Comput. Math., 25:417–461, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Brüning and M

    J. Brüning and M. Lesch. Hilbert complexes.Journal of Functional Analysis, 108(1):88– 132, 1992

    1992

  3. [11]

    Releasing the pressure: High-order surface flow discretizations via discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decompositions

    Tim Brüers, Christoph Lehrenfeld, Tim van Beeck, and Max Wardetzky. Replication Data for: “Releasing the pressure: High-order surface flow discretizations via discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decompositions”.GRO.data: https: // doi. org/ 10. 25625/ VDG40Z, 2026

    2026

  4. [12]

    Streamfunction-vorticity for- mulation for incompressible viscid and inviscid flows on general surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20763, 2025

    Tim Brüers, Christoph Lehrenfeld, and Max Wardetzky. Streamfunction-vorticity for- mulation for incompressible viscid and inviscid flows on general surfaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20763, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Stability of hodge decompositions in finite element spaces of differential forms in arbitrary dimension.Numerische Mathematik, 107(1):87–106, 2007

    Snorre H Christiansen. Stability of hodge decompositions in finite element spaces of differential forms in arbitrary dimension.Numerische Mathematik, 107(1):87–106, 2007

    2007

  6. [14]

    Cockburn, J

    B. Cockburn, J. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Lazarov. Unified hybridization of discontinuous Galerkin, mixed, and continuous Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47(2):1319–1365, 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    Robust fairing via conformal curvature flow.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(4):1–10, 2013

    Keenan Crane, Ulrich Pinkall, and Peter Schröder. Robust fairing via conformal curvature flow.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(4):1–10, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    A tangential and penalty-free finite element method for the surface Stokes problem.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(1):248–272, 2024

    Alan Demlow and Michael Neilan. A tangential and penalty-free finite element method for the surface Stokes problem.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(1):248–272, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    A Taylor–Hood finite element method for the surface Stokes problem without penalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20419, 2025

    Alan Demlow and Michael Neilan. A Taylor–Hood finite element method for the surface Stokes problem without penalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20419, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(1):24–57, 2024

    Zhaonan Dong and Alexandre Ern.C0-hybrid high-order methods for biharmonic problems. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(1):24–57, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Engel, K

    G. Engel, K. Garikipati, T.J.R. Hughes, M.G. Larson, L. Mazzei, and R.L. Taylor. Continuous/discontinuous finite element approximations of fourth-order elliptic problems in structural and continuum mechanics with applications to thin beams and plates, and strain gradient elast...

    2002

  12. [20]

    T. P. Fries. Higher-order surface FEM for incompressible Navier–Stokes flows on manifolds. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 88:55–78, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    An explicit divergence-free DG method for incompressible flow.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 345:502–517, mar 2019

    Guosheng Fu. An explicit divergence-free DG method for incompressible flow.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 345:502–517, mar 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Hodge decompositions with mixed boundary conditions and applications to partial differential equations on Lipschitz manifolds.Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 172(3), 2011

    Vladimir Gol’dshtein, Irina Mitrea, and Marius Mitrea. Hodge decompositions with mixed boundary conditions and applications to partial differential equations on Lipschitz manifolds.Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 172(3), 2011

    2011

  15. [23]

    Lederer, and Joachim Schöberl

    Jay Gopalakrishnan, Philip L. Lederer, and Joachim Schöberl. A mass conserving mixed stress formulation for the Stokes equations.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40(3):1838–1874, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Gross, T

    S. Gross, T. Jankuhn, M. A. Olshanskii, and A. Reusken. A trace finite element method for vector-Laplacians on surfaces.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 56:2406–2429, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Hansbo, M

    P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and K. Larsson. Analysis of finite element methods for vector Laplacians on surfaces.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40:1652–1701, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Geometric variational crimes: Hilbert complexes, finite element exterior calculus, and problems on hypersurfaces.Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 12(3):263–293, 2012

    Michael Holst and Ari Stern. Geometric variational crimes: Hilbert complexes, finite element exterior calculus, and problems on hypersurfaces.Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 12(3):263–293, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    Many facets of cohomology: Differential complexes and structure-aware formulations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22813, 2025

    Kaibo Hu. Many facets of cohomology: Differential complexes and structure-aware formulations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22813, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Divergence-free decoupled finite element methods for incompressible flow problems, 2025

    Volker John, Xu Li, and Christian Merdon. Divergence-free decoupled finite element methods for incompressible flow problems, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Divergence-conforming discontinuous Galerkin methods and Cˆ0 interior penalty methods.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52(4):1822–1842, 2014

    Guido Kanschat and Natasha Sharma. Divergence-conforming discontinuous Galerkin methods and Cˆ0 interior penalty methods.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52(4):1822–1842, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Lederer, Christoph Lehrenfeld, and Joachim Schöberl

    Philip L. Lederer, Christoph Lehrenfeld, and Joachim Schöberl. Divergence-free tangential finite element methods for incompressible flows on surfaces.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 121(12):2503–2533, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems

    Christoph Lehrenfeld. Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems. Master’s thesis, RWTH Aachen, May 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    High order exactly divergence-free hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for unsteady incompressible flows.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 307:339–361, 2016

    Christoph Lehrenfeld and Joachim Schöberl. High order exactly divergence-free hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for unsteady incompressible flows.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 307:339–361, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Embedded Trefftz Discontinuous Galerkin methods

    Christoph Lehrenfeld and Paul Stocker. Embedded Trefftz Discontinuous Galerkin methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07041, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Smoothed projections over manifolds in finite element exterior calculus

    Martin W Licht. Smoothed projections over manifolds in finite element exterior calculus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14276, 2023. 24

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Alexander Linke. On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 268:782–800, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    On the Conforming Trefftz Finite Element Method and Applications

    Johann Carl Meyer. On the Conforming Trefftz Finite Element Method and Applications. Master’s thesis, NAM, University of Göttingen, October 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Oxford university press, 2003

    Peter Monk.Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations. Oxford university press, 2003

    2003

  30. [38]

    A discrete divergence free weak Galerkin finite element method for the Stokes equations.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 125:172–182, 2018

    Lin Mu, Junping Wang, Xiu Ye, and Shangyou Zhang. A discrete divergence free weak Galerkin finite element method for the Stokes equations.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 125:172–182, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017

    Ingo Nitschke, Sebastian Reuther, and Axel Voigt.Discrete Exterior Calculus (DEC) for the Surface Navier–Stokes Equation, pages 177–197. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Nochetto and Mansur Shakipov

    Ricardo H. Nochetto and Mansur Shakipov. Surface Stokes without inf-sup condition, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Stream function formulation of surface Stokes equations.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40(1):109–139, 2020

    Arnold Reusken. Stream function formulation of surface Stokes equations.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40(1):109–139, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Reuther and A

    S. Reuther and A. Voigt. Solving the incompressible surface Navier–Stokes equation by surface finite elements.Physics of Fluids, 30(1):012107, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Netgen an advancing front 2d/3d-mesh generator based on abstract rules.Computing and Visualization in Science, 1(1):41–52, 1997

    Joachim Schöberl. Netgen an advancing front 2d/3d-mesh generator based on abstract rules.Computing and Visualization in Science, 1(1):41–52, 1997

    1997

  36. [44]

    C++ 11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve

    Joachim Schöberl. C++ 11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve. 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Joachim Schöberl and Sabine Zaglmayr. High order Nédélec elements with local com- plete sequence properties.COMPEL-The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 24(2):374–384, 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    Commuting quasi-interpolation operators for mixed finite elements

    Joachim Schöberl. Commuting quasi-interpolation operators for mixed finite elements. Preprint ISC-01-10-MATH, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2001

    2001

  39. [47]

    NGSTrefftz: Add-on to NGSolve for Trefftz methods.Journal of Open Source Software, 7(71):4135, 2022

    Paul Stocker. NGSTrefftz: Add-on to NGSolve for Trefftz methods.Journal of Open Source Software, 7(71):4135, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    A robust numerical method for Stokes equations based on divergence-freeH(div) finite element methods.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(4):2784–2802, 2009

    Junping Wang, Yanqiu Wang, and Xiu Ye. A robust numerical method for Stokes equations based on divergence-freeH(div) finite element methods.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(4):2784–2802, 2009

    2009

  41. [49]

    PhD thesis, Free University Berlin, 2006

    Max Wardetzky.Discrete Differential Operators on Polyhedral Surfaces – Convergence and Approximation. PhD thesis, Free University Berlin, 2006

    2006

  42. [50]

    Fluid Cohomology.ACM Trans

    Hang Yin, Mohammad Sina Nabizadeh, Baichuan Wu, Stephanie Wang, and Albert Chern. Fluid Cohomology.ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4), July 2023. 25

    2023

  43. [51]

    PhD thesis, JKU Linz, 2006

    Sabine Zaglmayr.High order finite element methods for electromagnetic field computation. PhD thesis, JKU Linz, 2006

    2006

  44. [52]

    Viscous Vortex Dynamics on Surfaces

    Cuncheng Zhu, Hang Yin, and Albert Chern. Viscous Vortex Dynamics on Surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph., 44(6), December 2025. Appendix A. Abstract Hilbert complexes The ideas discussed in this manuscript fit into the abstract framework of Hilbert complexes and finite element exterio...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.