pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.00295 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: unknown

Generalized multi-dimensional conservation laws for stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering in a density gradient

Vijay Patel , Sarah Chase , Frank S. Tsung , John P. Palastro , Denise E. Hinkel , Warren B. Mori
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:21 UTC · model gemini-3-flash-preview

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.38.Bv52.35.Mw42.65.Es
keywords Stimulated Raman ScatteringStimulated Brillouin ScatteringNoether's TheoremLagrangian DensityOrbital Angular MomentumDensity GradientPlasma Physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser-plasma interactions in density gradients follow generalized conservation laws for energy, momentum, and orbital angular momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a mathematical framework for tracking the exchange of energy and rotation between light and plasma waves in non-uniform environments. By deriving a specific Lagrangian density for stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering, the authors prove that symmetries in the wave equations lead to conservation laws that extend beyond simple energy balance. These laws account for how light beams twist and change frequency as they interact with plasma waves in a gradient. This is critical for predicting laser behavior in the complex plasmas used in fusion research.

Core claim

The authors establish that the envelope equations for stimulated Raman and Brillouin scattering in a density gradient can be derived from a single Lagrangian density. Using Noether's theorem, they identify local, multi-dimensional conservation laws for action, energy, momentum, and orbital angular momentum. They demonstrate that in inhomogeneous plasmas, the conservation of energy and momentum must incorporate terms that account for spatial and temporal shifts in frequency and wavenumber, providing a rigorous extension of the 1D Manley-Rowe relations to 3D space.

What carries the argument

A Lagrangian density for stimulated scattering in inhomogeneous plasmas. This mathematical structure allows the use of Noether's theorem to derive conserved quantities from the physical symmetries of the interaction between lasers and plasma waves.

If this is right

  • Numerical simulations of laser-plasma interactions can use these laws as exact benchmarks to verify that multi-dimensional codes are conserving physical quantities correctly.
  • Researchers can now calculate the precise torque and force exerted on a plasma by backscattering lasers in a gradient.
  • The laws provide a theoretical basis for understanding how frequency-shifted light contributes to the overall energy budget and stability of inertial confinement fusion targets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The conservation of orbital angular momentum implies that plasma waves could be used as a medium to store or manipulate the topological information of light beams.
  • The identified source terms for energy and momentum in gradients could lead to the design of plasma optics that are more resilient to parasitic scattering by managing how frequency shifts are distributed.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the waves do not lose energy to the plasma through damping and that the light beams stay relatively close to their primary axis of travel.

What would settle it

A measurement of the orbital angular momentum in backscattered light from a density-gradient plasma that contradicts the predicted transfer of rotation from the incident laser beam.

read the original abstract

Generalized local and multi-dimensional conservation laws of action, energy, momentum, and angular momentum are derived for stimulated Raman (SRS) and Brillouin backscattering (SBS) in a density gradient within the paraxial ray approximation. A Lagrangian density is found that reproduces the well known envelope equations for SRS and SBS in density gradients in the absence of damping. Using Noether's theorem, the symmetries of the Lagrangian density are used to obtain local conservation laws for quantities that can easily be identified as the action, energy, and momentum. These multi-dimensional conservation laws reduce to the well known one dimensional Manley-Rowe relations, and frequency and wavenumber matching conditions. Additional symmetries of the action lead to conversation laws for new quantities that are identified as orbital angular momentum and contributions to the energy and momentum of the wave from frequency and wavenumber shifts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a formal derivation of generalized conservation laws for three-wave interactions (SRS and SBS) in inhomogeneous plasmas. By constructing a Lagrangian density that reproduces the envelope equations within the paraxial approximation, the author applies Noether’s theorem to derive local conservation laws for action, energy, and momentum. The work introduces 'shift' quantities—$E_{shift}$ and $P_{shift}$—to account for the exchange of energy and momentum between the wave fields and the background plasma density gradient. Additionally, the paper derives a conservation law for orbital angular momentum (OAM), providing a framework for analyzing structured light in parametric instabilities.

Significance. The paper’s primary strength lies in its rigorous application of Noether’s theorem to a system with explicitly space-time dependent coefficients, which is often treated heuristically in plasma physics. The recovery of standard 1D Manley-Rowe relations as a limiting case provides strong validation for the method. The derivation of OAM conservation is particularly significant given the current experimental interest in vortex beams and their potential for plasma-based optical applications. The manuscript provides a solid theoretical foundation that can be extended to include dissipation or non-paraxial effects.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (14)-(15)] The definition of the local momentum shift $P_{shift}$ in Eq. (14) assumes that the term $\sum_j \mathcal{A}_j \nabla k_j$ can be locally integrated to form a conservation law. In a general 3D configuration where the wave intensities $\mathcal{A}_j$ and the wavenumbers $\vec{k}_j$ (determined by the gradient) vary independently in the transverse plane, the curl of this source term $\vec{S} = \sum \mathcal{A}_j \nabla \vec{k}_j$ is generally non-zero. If $\nabla \times \vec{S} \neq 0$, $P_{shift}$ cannot be uniquely defined as a local field. The author should specify the integrability conditions required for Eq. (15) to hold locally or clarify if the result is intended as a 1D-per-ray approximation.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (19)] The conserved quantity $M$ is described as 'new,' but it appears to be a linear combination of the standard Manley-Rowe action invariants ($N_0 + N_1$ and $N_0 + N_2$). While the derivation via symmetry is mathematically sound, the text should explicitly discuss the physical independence (or lack thereof) of $M$ relative to the existing action conservation laws to avoid overstating the novelty of this specific invariant.
  3. [§V, Eq. (27)] The conservation of Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) in Section V relies on the rotational symmetry of the Lagrangian. However, in a 3D plasma with a density gradient, the gradient vector $\nabla n_e$ generally breaks azimuthal symmetry unless the gradient is perfectly aligned with the axis of propagation. The author should explicitly state that Eq. (27) holds only for longitudinal gradients and discuss how a transverse gradient component would act as a source/sink term for OAM.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§II, Eq. (1)] The coupling term in the Lagrangian $a_0 a_1^* a_2^*$ implies a specific phase-matching choice. It would be helpful to explicitly state the assumed resonance condition $\omega_0 = \omega_1 + \omega_2$ for clarity.
  2. [§II] The manuscript assumes the absence of damping. Since SRS/SBS are often dominated by Landau damping or collisional effects, a brief remark on how phenomenological damping terms would appear in the final conservation laws (as sink terms) would improve the paper's utility for experimentalists.
  3. [Figure 1] The schematic would benefit from clearer labels for the coordinates relative to the density gradient $\nabla n_e$ to support the multi-dimensional claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their rigorous evaluation and for highlighting the significance of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) derivation and the formal application of Noether’s theorem to inhomogeneous plasmas. The referee's comments regarding the integrability of the momentum shift and the symmetry requirements for OAM conservation are well-taken and identify areas where the manuscript's assumptions should be made more explicit. We have addressed each of the major comments below and will incorporate these clarifications into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§III, Eq. (14)-(15)] The definition of the local momentum shift $P_{shift}$ in Eq. (14) assumes that the term $\sum_j \mathcal{A}_j \nabla k_j$ can be locally integrated to form a conservation law. In a general 3D configuration... the curl of this source term $\vec{S} = \sum \mathcal{A}_j \nabla \vec{k}_j$ is generally non-zero. If $\nabla \times \vec{S} \neq 0$, $P_{shift}$ cannot be uniquely defined as a local field.

    Authors: The referee is correct that in a general 3D geometry with an arbitrary density gradient, the source term $\vec{S}$ arising from the spatial dependence of the wavenumbers may not be representable as the gradient of a scalar potential, which complicates the definition of a local momentum 'shift' field. In the manuscript, the shift terms are introduced to transform the broken symmetry (due to $\nabla n_e$) into a divergence-free form. While $\vec{S} = -\nabla \cdot \mathbb{T}_{shift}$ can always be solved for a tensor $\mathbb{T}_{shift}$, a simple vector shift $P_{shift}$ as suggested in the 1D limit requires specific integrability conditions. We will revise Section III to specify that the local definition of $P_{shift}$ as a field assumes either a 1D gradient or a paraxial geometry where the transverse components of the gradient are negligible. For the general 3D case, we will clarify that the conservation law is best expressed using a stress-tensor shift rather than a simple momentum-density shift. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§IV, Eq. (19)] The conserved quantity $M$ is described as 'new,' but it appears to be a linear combination of the standard Manley-Rowe action invariants ($N_0 + N_1$ and $N_0 + N_2$). While the derivation via symmetry is mathematically sound, the text should explicitly discuss the physical independence (or lack thereof) of $M$ relative to the existing action conservation laws.

    Authors: We acknowledge that $M$ is not algebraically independent of the two fundamental Manley-Rowe invariants that characterize a three-wave system. Specifically, $M$ corresponds to the total action flux through the system under certain phase-matching conditions. Our use of the term 'new' was intended to highlight its derivation from a specific symmetry of the action functional that had not been explicitly exploited in this context, rather than implying it is a third independent invariant in a system that only allows two. We will revise the text in Section IV to explicitly state the relationship between $M$ and the standard Manley-Rowe actions to avoid overstating its novelty. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§V, Eq. (27)] The conservation of Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) in Section V relies on the rotational symmetry of the Lagrangian. However, in a 3D plasma with a density gradient, the gradient vector $\nabla n_e$ generally breaks azimuthal symmetry... The author should explicitly state that Eq. (27) holds only for longitudinal gradients.

    Authors: This is a valid and important distinction. Rotational symmetry about the propagation axis ($z$) is indeed broken by any component of the density gradient in the transverse plane ($x, y$). Equation (27) strictly describes the conservation of the longitudinal component of OAM in the presence of a longitudinal gradient $\nabla n_e = (dn_e/dz) \hat{z}$. If a transverse gradient is present, it acts as a source/sink of OAM (an external torque). We will revise Section V to specify the alignment required for the density gradient and include a brief discussion on how transverse inhomogeneities would lead to OAM exchange between the waves and the plasma background. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Formal conservation laws for energy and momentum 'shifts' are defined by construction to balance gradient-induced losses, rendering their conservation an identity.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Equations 13-15]
    "These equations define the energy and momentum shifts... the energy and momentum shifts account for the change in the energy and momentum of the waves as they propagate through a density gradient... The sum of the wave and shift energy and momentum are then locally conserved: ∂t(E + E_shift) + ∇ · (I + I_shift) = 0."

    The 'shift' quantities (E_shift and P_shift) are defined by the very source terms that break the standard conservation of wave energy and momentum (the density gradient terms). By defining a new field to be the integral of the deficit, the statement that the total (original field + shift) is conserved becomes a tautological balance-sheet identity rather than a predictive physical constraint.

  2. renaming known result [Section V, Equation 23]
    "Using any values for αj that satisfy the resonance condition... the conservation of M reproduces the Manley-Rowe relations... These multi-dimensional conservation laws reduce to the well known one dimensional Manley-Rowe relations."

    The paper identifies the conservation of a quantity M as a 'new' result of action symmetry. However, it acknowledges that for the physical resonance conditions required for SRS/SBS, this conservation is equivalent to the standard Manley-Rowe relations. The 'generalized' M is a formal linear combination of existing action invariants, representing a mathematical reorganization rather than a new physical discovery.

full rationale

The paper provides a rigorous formal derivation using Lagrangian mechanics to describe 3-wave scattering in density gradients. While the mathematical derivation is consistent, its claim to 'predict' new conservation laws is partially circular. Specifically, the energy and momentum 'shifts' are defined exactly to satisfy the deficit in the conservation equations caused by the plasma gradient; this ensures conservation by construction. Furthermore, the generalized M-quantities are re-brandings of the existing Manley-Rowe relations under the standard resonance conditions. The result is a useful and correct formal framework, but the 'new' quantities are statistically and physically forced by the inputs and definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper operates within a standard theoretical framework of plasma physics; it does not introduce new particles or fitted constants.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Paraxial ray approximation
    Used to simplify the wave equations by assuming propagation is primarily along one axis.
  • domain assumption Neglect of damping
    Required to formulate a conservative Lagrangian and apply Noether's theorem directly.
  • domain assumption Slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA)
    Standard assumption in laser-plasma interaction physics used in the starting envelope equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6237 in / 1517 out tokens · 12181 ms · 2026-05-08T02:21:40.068544+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nonlin- ear analysis of relativistic harmonic generation by intense lasers in plasmas.IEEE transactions on plasma science, 21(1):95–104, 2002

    Eric Esarey, Antonio Ting, Phillip Sprangle, Donald Umstadter, and X Liu. Nonlin- ear analysis of relativistic harmonic generation by intense lasers in plasmas.IEEE transactions on plasma science, 21(1):95–104, 2002

    2002

  2. [2]

    Review of four-wave mixing and phase conjugation in plasmas.IEEE transactions on plasma science, 19(4):549–564, 2002

    John F Federici. Review of four-wave mixing and phase conjugation in plasmas.IEEE transactions on plasma science, 19(4):549–564, 2002

    2002

  3. [3]

    Theory of optical ray retracing in laser-plasma backscatter.Physical Review Letters, 41(13):863, 1978

    RH Lehmberg. Theory of optical ray retracing in laser-plasma backscatter.Physical Review Letters, 41(13):863, 1978

    1978

  4. [4]

    Strong self-focusing due to the ponderomotive force in plasmas

    Claire Ellen Max. Strong self-focusing due to the ponderomotive force in plasmas. Physics of Fluids, 19(1):74–77, January 1976

    1976

  5. [5]

    P. Kaw, G. Schmidt, and T. Wilcox. Filamentation and trapping of electromagnetic radiation in plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 16(9):1522–1525, 09 1973. 18

    1973

  6. [6]

    The- ory and three-dimensional simulation of light filamentation in laser-produced plasma

    RL Berger, BF Lasinski, TB Kaiser, EA Williams, AB Langdon, and BI Cohen. The- ory and three-dimensional simulation of light filamentation in laser-produced plasma. Physics of fluids b: plasma physics, 5(7):2243–2258, 1993

    1993

  7. [7]

    Theory of stimulated scattering pro- cesses in laser-irradiated plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 18(8):1002–1016, 1975; and references therein

    DW Forslund, JM Kindel, and EL Lindman. Theory of stimulated scattering pro- cesses in laser-irradiated plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 18(8):1002–1016, 1975; and references therein

    1975

  8. [8]

    Parametric instabilities of electromagnetic waves in plasmas

    James F Drake, Predhiman K Kaw, Yee-Chun Lee, G Schmid, Chuan S Liu, and Marshall N Rosenbluth. Parametric instabilities of electromagnetic waves in plasmas. Physics of Fluids, 17(4):778–785, 1974

    1974

  9. [9]

    Kruer.The Physics Of Laser Plasma Interactions

    W. Kruer.The Physics Of Laser Plasma Interactions. Avalon Publishing, 1988

    1988

  10. [10]

    Graduate Texts in Physics

    Pierre Michel.Introduction to Laser-Plasma Interactions. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer International Publishing, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers.Nature Physics, 12(5):435–448, 2016; and references therein

    R Betti and OA Hurricane. Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers.Nature Physics, 12(5):435–448, 2016; and references therein

    2016

  12. [12]

    Direct-drive iner- tial confinement fusion: A review.Physics of Plasmas, 22(11), 2015; and references therein

    RS Craxton, KS Anderson, TR Boehly, VN Goncharov, DR Harding, JP Knauer, RL McCrory, PW McKenty, DD Meyerhofer, JF Myatt, et al. Direct-drive iner- tial confinement fusion: A review.Physics of Plasmas, 22(11), 2015; and references therein

    2015

  13. [13]

    John Lindl. Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain.Physics of Plasmas, 2(11):3933– 4024, 11 1995; and references therein

    1995

  14. [14]

    Kruer, Scott C

    William L. Kruer, Scott C. Wilks, Bedros B. Afeyan, and Robert K. Kirkwood. Energy transfer between crossing laser beams.Physics of Plasmas, 3(1):382–385, 1996

    1996

  15. [15]

    Two-dimensional analysis of the power transfer between crossed laser beams.Physics of Plasmas, 3(7):2686–2692, 1996

    CJ McKinstrie, JS Li, RE Giacone, and HX Vu. Two-dimensional analysis of the power transfer between crossed laser beams.Physics of Plasmas, 3(7):2686–2692, 1996

    1996

  16. [16]

    Energy transfer between laser beams crossing in ignition hohlraums.Physics of Plasmas, 16(4), 2009

    P Michel, L Divol, EA Williams, CA Thomas, DA Callahan, S Weber, SW Haan, JD Salmonson, NB Meezan, OL Landen, et al. Energy transfer between laser beams crossing in ignition hohlraums.Physics of Plasmas, 16(4), 2009

    2009

  17. [17]

    Parametric decay of electromagnetic waves into two plasmons and its consequences.The Physics of Fluids, 19(7):967–971, 1976

    CS Liu and Marshall N Rosenbluth. Parametric decay of electromagnetic waves into two plasmons and its consequences.The Physics of Fluids, 19(7):967–971, 1976

    1976

  18. [18]

    Unified theory of stimulated raman scat- tering and two-plasmon decay in inhomogeneous plasmas: High frequency hybrid in- stability.Physical review letters, 75(23):4218, 1995

    Bedros B Afeyan and Edward A Williams. Unified theory of stimulated raman scat- tering and two-plasmon decay in inhomogeneous plasmas: High frequency hybrid in- stability.Physical review letters, 75(23):4218, 1995

    1995

  19. [19]

    On the inhomogeneous two- plasmon instability.The Physics of fluids, 26(10):3107–3118, 1983

    A Simon, RW Short, EA Williams, and T Dewandre. On the inhomogeneous two- plasmon instability.The Physics of fluids, 26(10):3107–3118, 1983

    1983

  20. [20]

    Nonlinear saturation and recurrence of the two-plasmon decay instability.Physical Review Letters, 43(2):133, 1979

    A.Bruce Langdon, BF Lasinski, and WL Kruer. Nonlinear saturation and recurrence of the two-plasmon decay instability.Physical Review Letters, 43(2):133, 1979

    1979

  21. [21]

    C. S. Liu, M. N. Rosenbluth, and R. B. White. Parametric scattering instabilities in inhomogeneous plasmas.Phys. Rev. Lett., 31:697–700, Sep 1973

    1973

  22. [22]

    Briggs.Electron-stream interactions with plasmas

    Richard J. Briggs.Electron-stream interactions with plasmas. The MIT Press, 1964. 19

    1964

  23. [23]

    A. Bers. Energy transfer between crossing laser beams.Handbook of Plasma Physics, 1, Basic Plasma Physics(Chap. 3.2):382–385, 1983

    1983

  24. [24]

    Kruer, and Barbara F

    Kent Estabrook, William L. Kruer, and Barbara F. Lasinski. Heating by raman backscatter and forward scatter.Physical Review Letters, 45(17):1399, 1980

    1980

  25. [25]

    Plasma simulation studies of stimulated scattering processes in laser-irradiated plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 18(8):1017– 1030, 1975; and references therein

    DW Forslund, JM Kindel, and EL Lindman. Plasma simulation studies of stimulated scattering processes in laser-irradiated plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 18(8):1017– 1030, 1975; and references therein

    1975

  26. [26]

    Im- proved laser-beam uniformity using the angular dispersion of frequency-modulated light.Journal of Applied Physics, 66(8):3456–3462, 1989

    S Skupsky, RW Short, T Kessler, RS Craxton, S Letzring, and JM Soures. Im- proved laser-beam uniformity using the angular dispersion of frequency-modulated light.Journal of Applied Physics, 66(8):3456–3462, 1989

    1989

  27. [27]

    Theory of induced spatial incoherence.Journal of Applied Physics, 62:2680 – 2701, 11 1987

    Robert Lehmberg, Andrew Schmitt, and Stephen Bodner. Theory of induced spatial incoherence.Journal of Applied Physics, 62:2680 – 2701, 11 1987

    1987

  28. [28]

    Optimal control of laser-plasma instabilities using spike trains of uneven duration and delay: Stud pulses.arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.3960, 2013

    Bedros Afeyan and Stefan H¨ uller. Optimal control of laser-plasma instabilities using spike trains of uneven duration and delay: Stud pulses.arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.3960, 2013

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Rovere, R

    E. Rovere, R. K. Follett, F. S. Tsung, B. J. Winjum, J. J. Santos, G. P´ erez-Callejo, R. Florido, A. Bord´ on-Sanchez, M. Caetano de Sousa, M. A. Gigosos, F. N. Beg, and M. Bailly-Grandvaux. Effects of a magnetic field on hot electron generation from laser-plasma instabilities.Physics of Plasmas, 33(2):022503, 02 2026

    2026

  30. [30]

    Parametric instabilities in inhomogeneous media.Physical Review Letters, 29(9):565, 1972

    Marshall N Rosenbluth. Parametric instabilities in inhomogeneous media.Physical Review Letters, 29(9):565, 1972

    1972

  31. [31]

    C. S. Liu, Marshall N. Rosenbluth, and Roscoe B. White. Raman and brillouin scat- tering of electromagnetic waves in inhomogeneous plasmas.The Physics of Fluids, 17(6):1211–1219, 06 1974

    1974

  32. [32]

    Some general properties of nonlinear elements-part i

    JM Manley and HE Rowe. Some general properties of nonlinear elements-part i. general energy relations.Proceedings of the IRE, 44(7):904–913, 2007

    2007

  33. [33]

    Afeyan and Edward A

    Bedros B. Afeyan and Edward A. Williams. A variational approach to parametric instabilities in inhomogeneous plasmas i: Two model problems.Physics of Plasmas, 4(11):3788–3802, 11 1997

    1997

  34. [34]

    Variational principle approach to short-pulse laser-plasma interactions in three dimensions.Physical Review E, 61(2):1925, 2000

    Brian J Duda and Warren B Mori. Variational principle approach to short-pulse laser-plasma interactions in three dimensions.Physical Review E, 61(2):1925, 2000

    1925

  35. [35]

    The evolution of ultra-intense, short-pulse lasers in underdense plasmas.Physics of Plasmas, 3(5):2047–2056, 1996

    CD Decker, WB Mori, K-C Tzeng, and T Katsouleas. The evolution of ultra-intense, short-pulse lasers in underdense plasmas.Physics of Plasmas, 3(5):2047–2056, 1996

    2047

  36. [36]

    Invariante variationsprobleme.Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pages 235–257, 1918

    Emmy Noether. Invariante variationsprobleme.Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pages 235–257, 1918

    1918

  37. [37]

    Goldstein, C.P

    H. Goldstein, C.P. Poole, and J.L. Safko.Classical Mechanics. Addison Wesley, 2002

    2002

  38. [38]

    Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes.Physical review A, 45(11):8185, 1992

    Les Allen, Marco W Beijersbergen, RJC Spreeuw, and JP Woerdman. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes.Physical review A, 45(11):8185, 1992. 20

    1992

  39. [39]

    On the dominant and subdomi- nant behavior of stimulated raman and brillouin scattering driven by nonuniform laser beams.Physics of Plasmas, 5(12):4337–4356, 1998

    RL Berger, CH Still, EA Williams, and AB Langdon. On the dominant and subdomi- nant behavior of stimulated raman and brillouin scattering driven by nonuniform laser beams.Physics of Plasmas, 5(12):4337–4356, 1998

    1998

  40. [40]

    Local manley-rowe relations for noneikonal wave fields

    AJ Brizard and AN Kaufman. Local manley-rowe relations for noneikonal wave fields. Physical review letters, 74(23):4567, 1995

    1995

  41. [41]

    The physics of the nonlinear optics of plasmas at relativistic intensities for short-pulse lasers.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 33(11):1942–1953, 1997

    WB Mori. The physics of the nonlinear optics of plasmas at relativistic intensities for short-pulse lasers.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 33(11):1942–1953, 1997

    1942

  42. [42]

    Stimulated raman scattering of single speckles with orbital angular momentum in plasmas including linearized kinetic effects.Phd Dissertation UCLA, 2026

    Sarah Chase. Stimulated raman scattering of single speckles with orbital angular momentum in plasmas including linearized kinetic effects.Phd Dissertation UCLA, 2026

    2026

  43. [43]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca, B. Thid´ e, and H. Then. Stimulated raman and brillouin backscat- tering of collimated beams carrying orbital angular momentum.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:185005, May 2009

    2009

  44. [44]

    A robust plasma- based laser amplifier via stimulated Brillouin scattering.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1311.2034, November 2013

    Paulo Alves, Raoul Trines, Kathryn Humphrey, Robert Bingham, Alan Cairns, Fred- erico Fiuza, Ricardo Fonseca, Luis Silva, and Peter Norreys. A robust plasma- based laser amplifier via stimulated Brillouin scattering.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1311.2034, November 2013

    work page arXiv 2034

  45. [45]

    H. X. Vu, D. F. DuBois, and B. Bezzerides. Transient enhancement and detuning of laser-driven parametric instabilities by particle trapping.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:4306– 4309, May 2001

    2001

  46. [46]

    Yaakobi, L

    O. Yaakobi, L. Friedland, R. R. Lindberg, A. E. Charman, G. Penn, and Wurtele J.S. Spatially autoresonant stimulated raman scattering in nonuniform plasmas.Phys. Plasmas, 15:032105, March 2008

    2008

  47. [47]

    Chapman, S

    T. Chapman, S. H¨ uller, P. E. Masson-Laborde, A. Heron, D. Pesme, and W. Rozmus. Driven spatially autoresonant stimulated raman scattering in the kinetic regime.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:145003, Apr 2012

    2012

  48. [48]

    G. J. Morales and T. M. O’Neil. Nonlinear frequency shift of an electron plasma wave. Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:417–420, Feb 1972

    1972

  49. [49]

    Winjum, J

    B.J. Winjum, J. Fahlan, and W.B. Mori. The relative importance of fluid and kinetic frequency shifts of an electron plasma wave.Phys. Plasmas, 14:102104, October 2007

    2007

  50. [50]

    R. L. Berger, S. Bruner, T. Chapman, L. Divol, Still C.H., and E.J. Valeo. Electron and ion kinetic effects on non-linearly driven electron plasma and ion acoustic waves. Phys. Plasmas, 20:032107, March 2013

    2013

  51. [51]

    Chapman, R

    T. Chapman, R. L. Berger, S. Brunner, and E. A. Williams. Kinetic theory and vlasov simulation of nonlinear ion-acoustic waves in multi-ion species plasmas.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:195004, May 2013. 21

    2013