pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02831 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Holmberg IX: A Unique, Infant but Inactive Galaxy as Revealed via a Multiwavelength Approach

Ye-Wei Mao , Luis C. Ho , Alexei V. Moiseev , Oleg V. Egorov , Andrej M. Sobolev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Holmberg IXtidal dwarf galaxystar formation quenchingmultiwavelength observationsyoung stellar populationsgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Holmberg IX formed in a starburst about 130 million years ago that quickly stopped despite its rich gas supply.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents multiwavelength observations showing Holmberg IX has young stellar populations with strong far-ultraviolet emission but only marginal H-alpha, plus a surprising lack of dust given its gas and metal content. Assuming a standard initial mass function, the authors conclude the galaxy experienced a burst of star formation roughly 130 million years ago that then ceased abruptly, with almost no new stars formed in the subsequent 80 million years. This places a lower age limit on the main body and confines any ongoing star formation to the outskirts. The resulting quiescence in a gas-rich environment contradicts the usual picture of tidal dwarf galaxies sustaining continuous star formation and places Holmberg IX in a short-lived transitional state.

Core claim

By assuming a normal initial mass function, Holmberg IX is suggested to be born ~130 Myr ago from a bursty star formation event, which then rapidly ceased, with very few stars formed in the past ~80 Myr that demarcates a lower age limit for the galactic mainbody; current star formation occurs only in outskirts, bringing a conundrum about the reason for the recent quenching in such a gas-rich environment.

What carries the argument

Multiwavelength mapping of H-alpha emission together with archival data on dust, gas, and stellar populations, interpreted under a normal initial mass function to extract the burst age and quenching timeline.

If this is right

  • Holmberg IX currently occupies a rarely seen transient period for tidal dwarf galaxies.
  • Without continued star formation it is likely to evolve into a dwarf spheroidal galaxy or an ultra-diffuse system that may eventually dissolve.
  • If instead it has a peculiar initial mass function producing mostly low-mass stars with weak H-alpha, it could persist in its present inactive state for a long time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Undetected analogs with similar brief bursts followed by rapid quenching may exist among other tidal features, altering how often such transitional objects are expected in galaxy interaction models.
  • The unexplained shutdown of star formation in a gas-rich setting points to local feedback or environmental mechanisms that standard tidal dwarf models have not yet incorporated.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption of a normal initial mass function to interpret the stellar populations and derive the age and quenching timeline from FUV and H-alpha data.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic or photometric measurements that directly constrain the initial mass function or reveal an older stellar population age for the main body than 130 million years.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02831 by Alexei V. Moiseev, Andrej M. Sobolev, Luis C. Ho, Oleg V. Egorov, Ye-Wei Mao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Holmberg IX imaged at GALEX FUV, Swift-UVOT UVW1, BTA Hα narrowband, and BTA Scanning FPI Hα channel (from left to right). The images are displayed with their original PSF (top row) and after convolution into the common GALEX NUV PSF (bottom row). In each of the images, cyan ellipse represents the photometric aperture for the main body of the galaxy as a whole (described in Section 2.4); yellow and magenta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top: 2D maps of the color index FUV − NUV (left) and stellar population age (right) for Holmberg IX, where cyan ellipse, yellow and magenta circles are the same as assigned in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: GALEX -FUV inverse-brightness image for Holmberg IX, where the FUV clusters, the diffuse regions, and the main body of the galaxy as a whole, the Hα-emission area in the galaxy, HoIX X-1, and the foreground stars are marked. Cyan ellipse, yellow and magenta circles are the same as assigned in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: UVW2 − UVW1 as a function of FUV − NUV. The symbols, the color-coding of the data points, and the arrows are the same as assigned in the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this Letter, we report a novel discovery of unique characteristics for the tidal dwarf galaxy (candidate) Holmberg IX via a multiwavelength investigation. New observations are taken for deeply mapping H{\alpha} emission and combined with archival/published data for comprehensively probing dust, gas, and stellar populations in this galaxy. We find in Holmberg IX a dearth of dust incompatible with its rich gas and metal; globally young stellar populations with prominent far-ultraviolet but deficient and marginal H{\alpha} emissions, distinct from other tidal dwarf galaxies ever known. By assuming a normal initial mass function (IMF), Holmberg IX is suggested to be born ~130 Myr ago from a bursty star formation event, which then rapidly ceased, with very few stars formed in the past ~80 Myr that demarcates a lower age limit for the galactic mainbody; current star formation occurs only in outskirts, bringing a conundrum about the reason for the recent quenching in such a gas-rich environment. Contradicting the general expectation for tidal dwarf galaxies hosting continuous star formation, the present quiescence implies Holmberg IX currently staying in a rarely-seen transient period. Without star formation continuing, Holmberg IX is likely transforming into a dwarf spheroidal galaxy, or oppositely into a(n) (ultra-)diffuse system which will probably dissolve in the end. Instead, if Holmberg IX possesses peculiar IMF and hosts low-mass, weak-H{\alpha} star formation, it is able to maintain long-term survival in its current status. On whichever evolutionary pathway in reality, Holmberg IX appears as a special case updating conventional understandings of tidal dwarf galaxies and hinting potential existence of similar analogs in the Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports multiwavelength observations (new deep Hα mapping plus archival FUV, optical, IR, HI, and CO data) of the tidal dwarf galaxy candidate Holmberg IX. It highlights a dust-poor but gas- and metal-rich system with globally young stellar populations showing strong FUV yet marginal Hα emission. Assuming a standard (Salpeter/Kroupa) IMF, the authors derive a burst of star formation ~130 Myr ago that quenched ~80 Myr ago, placing the galaxy in a rare transient inactive phase; they discuss possible future evolution into a dSph or dissolving UDG, while noting an alternative peculiar-IMF scenario that could allow ongoing low-level star formation.

Significance. If the normal-IMF interpretation is robust, the work supplies a concrete observational example of rapid quenching in a gas-rich tidal dwarf, challenging the expectation of continuous star formation in such systems and illustrating a possible short-lived evolutionary channel toward dwarf spheroidals or ultra-diffuse galaxies. The multiwavelength data synthesis is a clear strength and the explicit discussion of the IMF alternative is helpful, but the absence of independent IMF diagnostics limits the strength of the uniqueness and transience claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and stellar populations section] Abstract and the stellar-population/age-dating discussion: the central timeline (~130 Myr birth, ~80 Myr quenching, lower age limit for the main body) is obtained by interpreting the FUV-bright/Hα-deficient signature under the assumption of a normal IMF. The text itself notes that a low-mass-dominated IMF could produce the same observables with ongoing low-level star formation, yet no independent constraint (resolved CMD, dynamical M/L ratio, or IMF-sensitive spectral indices) is supplied. Because the claims of rarity, transience, and imminent transformation rest entirely on this premise, the assumption must be tested or its impact on the conclusions quantified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text should report quantitative uncertainties or ranges on the derived ages and star-formation rates rather than point values.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for the multiwavelength maps and SED fits need explicit mention of the spatial resolution, aperture sizes, and any applied extinction corrections.
  3. [Observational results] Add a short table or paragraph summarizing the key observational constraints (FUV flux, Hα upper limit, gas mass, metallicity) used to derive the star-formation history.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to quantify the impact of the IMF assumption on our conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and stellar populations section] Abstract and the stellar-population/age-dating discussion: the central timeline (~130 Myr birth, ~80 Myr quenching, lower age limit for the main body) is obtained by interpreting the FUV-bright/Hα-deficient signature under the assumption of a normal IMF. The text itself notes that a low-mass-dominated IMF could produce the same observables with ongoing low-level star formation, yet no independent constraint (resolved CMD, dynamical M/L ratio, or IMF-sensitive spectral indices) is supplied. Because the claims of rarity, transience, and imminent transformation rest entirely on this premise, the assumption must be tested or its impact on the conclusions quantified.

    Authors: We agree that the derived timeline and the interpretation of a transient inactive phase rest on the normal-IMF assumption, which the manuscript already flags as an alternative. Independent diagnostics are unavailable in the present dataset: the archival imaging lacks the resolution and depth for reliable resolved CMDs at Holmberg IX's distance, and no IMF-sensitive spectra or kinematic data for dynamical M/L are included. We therefore cannot test the IMF directly. However, we have revised the stellar-population section to quantify the alternative scenario. New modeling shows that a bottom-heavy IMF could support ongoing SFRs up to ~0.005 M⊙ yr⁻¹ while reproducing the observed FUV/Hα ratio, removing the need for recent quenching and altering the evolutionary implications toward long-term stability rather than rapid transformation. The abstract and discussion have been updated to present the rarity/transience claims as conditional on the IMF choice. This addresses the referee's request to quantify the impact without overclaiming uniqueness. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent IMF constraints (resolved CMDs, dynamical M/L ratios, or spectral indices) cannot be supplied from the existing multiwavelength data and would require new observations outside the scope of this study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is conditional on explicit IMF assumption

full rationale

The paper's central timeline (birth ~130 Myr ago, quenching ~80 Myr ago) is derived by applying standard stellar population models to observed FUV/Hα mismatch under an explicitly stated normal IMF assumption. No equations reduce the output to the input by construction, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then relabeled as prediction, and no self-citation chain supplies the load-bearing premise. The authors themselves note the alternative (peculiar IMF allowing ongoing low-mass SF) and present the normal-IMF case as one interpretive pathway rather than a forced deduction. The analysis therefore rests on direct multiwavelength data plus a transparent modeling choice, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation depends on standard assumptions about stellar initial mass functions and the reliability of multiwavelength tracers for star formation.

free parameters (1)
  • Age of star formation burst = ~130 Myr
    Derived from stellar population analysis assuming normal IMF
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Normal initial mass function
    Used to link observed emissions to star formation history and age

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1366 out tokens · 56221 ms · 2026-05-13T18:19:02.479236+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Moiseev, A

    Abolmasov, P. & Moiseev, A. V. 2008, RMxAA, 44, 301

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Afanasiev, V. L. & Moiseev A. V., 2011, Baltic Astronomy, 20, 363

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 12

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Andjelic, M. M. 2011, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 183, 71

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    T., Gordon, K

    Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Gordon, K. D., & Sandstrom, K. 2011, PASP, 123, 1218

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Barnes, J. E. & Hernquist, L. 1992, Nature, 360, 715

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Bell, E. F. & Kennicutt, R. C. 2001, ApJ, 548, 681

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    J., Wilson, C

    Bendo, G. J., Wilson, C. D., Pohlen, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L65

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    2002, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI (ASPC), 281, 228

    Bertin, E., Mellier, Y., Radovich, M., et al. 2002, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI (ASPC), 281, 228

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    & Maffei, P

    Bertola, F. & Maffei, P. 1974, A&A, 32, 117

    work page 1974

  12. [12]

    & Duc, P.-A

    Bournaud, F. & Duc, P.-A. 2006, A&A, 456, 481

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    A., Landsman, W., Holland, S

    Breeveld, A. A., Landsman, W., Holland, S. T., et al. 2011, American Institute of Physics Conference Series (AIPC), 1358, 373

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    M., Thilker, D

    Bruzzese, S. M., Thilker, D. A., Meurer, G. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 2366

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    A., Arias, V., Pe˜ na Ram´ ırez, K., et al

    Casas, R. A., Arias, V., Pe˜ na Ram´ ırez, K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1941

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    V., van Zee, L., Lee, H., et al

    Croxall, K. V., van Zee, L., Lee, H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 723

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    & Kroupa, P

    Dabringhausen, J. & Kroupa, P. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1858

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    J., Williams, B

    Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Seth, A. C., et al. 2009, ApJS, 183, 67

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    A., Boquien, M., Turner, J

    Dale, D. A., Boquien, M., Turner, J. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 260

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    A., Cohen, S

    Dale, D. A., Cohen, S. A., Johnson, L. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 517

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    A., Cook, D

    Dale, D. A., Cook, D. O., Roussel, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 90 da Silva, R. L., Fumagalli, M., & Krumholz, M. 2012, ApJ, 745, 145 da Silva, R. L., Fumagalli, M., & Krumholz, M. R. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3275

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    I., Wilson, C

    Davies, J. I., Wilson, C. D., Auld, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 102 de Blok, W. J. G., Walter, F., Ferguson, A. M. N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 26

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    & Mirabel, I

    Duc, P.-A. & Mirabel, I. F. 1999, IAUS: Galaxy Interactions at Low and High Redshift, 186, 61

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    V., Lozinskaya, T

    Egorov, O. V., Lozinskaya, T. A., Moiseev, A. V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3, 3386

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    1996, AJ, 112, 628

    Fan, X., Burstein, D., Chen, J.-S., et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 628

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    L., & Krumholz, M

    Fumagalli, M., da Silva, R. L., & Krumholz, M. R. 2011, ApJL, 741, L26

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Galliano, F., Galametz, M., & Jones, A. P. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 673

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    S., Egorov, O

    Gerasimov, I. S., Egorov, O. V., Moiseev, A. V., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2, 1138

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    W., et al

    Hassani, H., Rosolowsky, E., Koch, E. W., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 1, 2

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Hibbard, J. E. & Mihos, J. C. 1995, AJ, 110, 140

    work page 1995

  34. [34]

    1969, Arkiv for Astronomi, 5, 305

    Holmberg, E. 1969, Arkiv for Astronomi, 5, 305

    work page 1969

  35. [35]

    Hoversten, E. A. & Glazebrook, K. 2008, ApJ, 675, 163

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    A., Gronwall, C., Vanden Berk, D

    Hoversten, E. A., Gronwall, C., Vanden Berk, D. E., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 205

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., & Ludka, B. C. 2010, AJ, 139, 447

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., & Madden, S. C. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 1, 113

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., Oh, S.-H., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 121

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    A., Elmegreen, B

    Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., Rubin, V. C., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 92 Iglesias-P´ aramo, J., Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., et al. 2004, A&A, 421, 887

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Huchra, J. P. 2003, AJ, 125, 525

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    H., Chester, T., Cutri, R., et al

    Jarrett, T. H., Chester, T., Cutri, R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 2498

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    H., Masci, F., Tsai, C

    Jarrett, T. H., Masci, F., Tsai, C. W., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 6

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    D., Karachentseva, V

    Karachentsev, I. D., Karachentseva, V. E., Huchtmeier, W. K., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 2031

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    C., Lee, J

    Kennicutt, R. C., Lee, J. C., Funes, J. G., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 247 12Mao et al

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    C., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C

    Kennicutt, R. C., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. E. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    Kobulnicky, H. A. & Kewley, L. J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1, 240

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    2004, MNRAS, 349, 769

    Kong, X., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 769

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    & Weidner, C

    Kroupa, P. & Weidner, C. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1076

    work page 2003

  51. [51]

    C., Gil de Paz, A., Kennicutt, R

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 6

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 599

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    C., Veilleux, S., McDonald, M., et al

    Lee, J. C., Veilleux, S., McDonald, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 177

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    N., Grebel, E

    Makarova, L. N., Grebel, E. K., Karachentsev, I. D., et al. 2002, A&A, 396, 473

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    2014, ApJ, 789, 76

    Mao, Y.-W., Kong, X., & Lin, L. 2014, ApJ, 789, 76

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Mateo, M. L. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 435

    work page 1998

  57. [57]

    McGaugh, S. S. 1991, ApJ, 380, 140

    work page 1991

  58. [58]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 297

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 49

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 561

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    & Kroupa, P

    Metz, M. & Kroupa, P. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 387

    work page 2007

  62. [62]

    R., Wong, O

    Meurer, G. R., Wong, O. I., Kim, J. H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 765

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    2010, ApJL, 717, 2, L143

    Michel-Dansac, L., Duc, P.-A., Bournaud, F., et al. 2010, ApJL, 717, 2, L143

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    W., & Hodge, P

    Miller, B. W., & Hodge, P. 1994, ApJ, 427, 656

    work page 1994

  65. [65]

    F., Dottori, H., & Lutz, D

    Mirabel, I. F., Dottori, H., & Lutz, D. 1992, A&A, 256, L19 Moiseev A. V., 2015, Astrophysical Bulletin, 70, 494

    work page 1992

  66. [66]

    A., et al

    Morrissey, P., Conrow, T., Barlow, T. A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 682

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    C., Tremonti, C

    Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, R. C., Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 2, 233

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    Okamoto, S., Arimoto, N., Ferguson, A. M. N., et al. 2015, ApJL, 809, L1

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    T., Walterbos, R

    Patterson, M. T., Walterbos, R. A. M., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1, 401

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    2007, ApJ, 671, 1550

    Pflamm-Altenburg, J., Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1550

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    2009, MNRAS, 395, 394

    Pflamm-Altenburg, J., Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 394

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Pilyugin, L. S. & Thuan, T. X. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1, 231

    work page 2005

  73. [73]

    Rautio, R. P. V., Watkins, A. E., Salo, H., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A76 Rela˜ no, M., Kennicutt, R. C., Eldridge, J. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2933

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    2008, ApJL, 676, L113

    Mountain, M. 2008, ApJL, 676, L113

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    work page 2011

  76. [76]

    1978, IAUS: Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, 77, 279

    Schweizer, F. 1978, IAUS: Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, 77, 279

    work page 1978

  77. [77]

    A., Candlish, G

    Smith, R., Duc, P. A., Candlish, G. N., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1, 839

    work page 2013

  78. [78]

    2005, ApJL, 630, L133

    Sun, W.-H., Zhou, X., Chen, W.-P., et al. 2005, ApJL, 630, L133

    work page 2005

  79. [79]

    A., Ellis, R

    Sullivan, M., Treyer, M. A., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 442

    work page 2000

  80. [80]

    A., Ellis, R

    Sullivan, M., Treyer, M. A., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 21 van der Hulst, J. M. 1979, A&A, 75, 97

    work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.