arxiv: 2604.02922 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Mott-Derived Local Moments and Kondo Hybridization in a d-electron Kagome lattice

Xing Zhang , Xintong Li , Boqin Song , Yuyang Xie , Qinghong Wang , Taimin Miao , Shusen Ye , Junhao Liu

show 20 more authors

Bo Liang Neng Cai Hao Chen Wenpei Zhu Mingkai Xu Wei-Jian Li Shun-Li Yu Shenjin Zhang Fengfeng Zhang Feng Yang Zhimin Wang Qinjun Peng Hanqing Mao Zhihai Zhu Guodong Liu Zuyan Xu Yi-feng Yang Tianping Ying Lin Zhao X. J. Zhou

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords kondohybridizationkagomelocalmomentsd-electrontemperaturearpes

0 comments

The pith

In CsCr6Sb6, Mott splitting of the kagome flat band creates local moments that hybridize with conduction electrons at low temperature, shown by temperature-dependent STS Fano lineshapes near EF and ARPES quasiparticle peaks that vanish together while high-energy humps persist.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Kagome lattices have flat bands where electrons move slowly and interact strongly. In this material the authors observe that electron repulsion first splits the flat band into a filled lower Hubbard band and an empty upper one, visible as symmetric humps at about 50 meV in both STS and ARPES. These features stay visible up to higher temperatures. At much lower temperatures a new asymmetric dip appears right at the Fermi level in STS, fitted by a Fano shape, together with a sharp peak in ARPES. Both low-energy features disappear on the same warming scale, consistent with the local moments from the lower Hubbard band beginning to mix with the moving electrons. The separation of the two energy scales and their distinct temperature dependences supports a two-stage sequence rather than a single process.

Core claim

This separation of energy and temperature scales supports a two-stage picture in which a kagome flat band first undergoes correlation-driven splitting into lower and upper Hubbard bands, and the occupied lower Hubbard band supplies the local moments that later hybridize with itinerant electrons at lower temperature.

Load-bearing premise

That the symmetric high-energy humps at ±50 mV are the upper and lower Hubbard bands arising from Mott splitting of the flat band, and that the low-energy asymmetric suppression and quasiparticle peak are produced by Kondo hybridization rather than other many-body or band-structure effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02922 by Bo Liang, Boqin Song, Fengfeng Zhang, Feng Yang, Guodong Liu, Hanqing Mao, Hao Chen, Junhao Liu, Lin Zhao, Mingkai Xu, Neng Cai, Qinghong Wang, Qinjun Peng, Shenjin Zhang, Shun-Li Yu, Shusen Ye, Taimin Miao, Tianping Ying, Wei-Jian Li, Wenpei Zhu, Xing Zhang, Xintong Li, X. J. Zhou, Yi-feng Yang, Yuyang Xie, Zhihai Zhu, Zhimin Wang, Zuyan Xu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Unlike canonical Kondo lattices in f-electron systems, where localized f orbitalsnaturally provide local moments, d-electron Kondo lattices require a distinct mechanism for local-moment formation. However, the study of d-electron Kondo lattices in bulk materials remains far from settled, particularly with regard to the microscopic origin of the local moments. Here, we report a microscopic mechanism for this process in the bilayer kagome metal CsCr6Sb6, where strong correlations drive a Mott splitting of the kagome flat band to supply the requisite local moments. By combining STM/STS and ARPES, we resolve a spectroscopic hierarchy between high-energy correlation effects and low temperature hybridization. Low-temperature STS reveals a robust asymmetric suppression of the density of states near EF that is well captured phenomenologically by a Fano-type lineshape, while ARPES detects a sharp quasiparticlepeak near EF. These low-energy signatures evolveon the same temperature scale and disappear upon warming, consistent with the onset of Kondo hybridization. At the same time, STS resolves symmetric humps at approximately +-50 mV and ARPES identifies a weakly dispersive feature around 50 meV below EF; unlike the near-EF hybridization signatures, these features persist to substantially higher temperatures. This separation of energy and temperature scales supports a two-stage picture in which a kagome flat band first undergoes correlation-driven splitting into lower and upper Hubbard bands, and the occupied lower Hubbard band supplies the local moments that later hybridize with itinerant electrons at lower temperature. Our results therefore move beyond the phenomenology of a kagome Kondo lattice candidate and instead provide a microscopic spectroscopic picture linking Mottness to Kondo hybridization in a frustrated d-electron system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports clean spectroscopic separation of high-energy persistent features and low-energy hybridization in CsCr6Sb6 but assigns the former to Mott Hubbard bands without calculations to back it up.

read the letter

The core observation here is a temperature hierarchy in CsCr6Sb6: symmetric STS humps at roughly ±50 mV and a weakly dispersive ARPES feature near 50 meV below EF stay visible to higher temperatures, while the low-energy Fano-like suppression and quasiparticle peak fade together. The authors read this as a two-stage process where the kagome flat band first splits into Hubbard bands that supply local moments, which then hybridize at lower T. That separation of scales is the new piece for d-electron kagome Kondo candidates. The data combination of STS and ARPES is straightforward and the temperature trends line up internally. The material itself is a fresh platform for this kind of question. The main limitation is that the Hubbard-band assignment is still phenomenological. The manuscript shows no DFT+U, DMFT, or tight-binding calculation that predicts the ~100 meV splitting, places the flat band, or reproduces the dispersion and weight. Without that, the high-energy features could come from other d-bands or different correlations, and the link from flat-band Mottness to the local moments remains an interpretation rather than a demonstrated mechanism. The Fano fit for the low-energy part is also just a lineshape match. This is useful for groups working on kagome flat bands and d-electron Kondo lattices. The experimental results are worth referee time even if the interpretation needs tightening with theory. I would send it out for review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental spectroscopy interpreted via observed scales

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study using STM/STS and ARPES on CsCr6Sb6. It reports measured spectral features (symmetric humps at ±50 mV, low-energy Fano suppression, quasiparticle peak, weakly dispersive ARPES band) and their distinct temperature dependences. The two-stage Mott-then-Kondo interpretation is offered as a consistent reading of the hierarchy of energy and temperature scales, but no equation, fit, or derivation reduces any claimed result to a quantity defined by the same result. No self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz; no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled a prediction. The central claim therefore remains an interpretive model open to external theoretical checks rather than a self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain-standard interpretations of spectroscopic lineshapes as Mott Hubbard bands and Kondo Fano resonances; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the phenomenological Fano fit, and no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

Fano asymmetry and width parameters
Phenomenological fit to the low-energy density-of-states suppression; values not reported in abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Symmetric humps at approximately ±50 mV are the upper and lower Hubbard bands from Mott splitting of the kagome flat band.
Invoked to assign the high-energy features observed in both STS and ARPES.
domain assumption The low-energy asymmetric suppression and quasiparticle peak arise from Kondo hybridization of the local moments with itinerant electrons.
Invoked to interpret the temperature-dependent near-EF signatures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5711 in / 1471 out tokens · 85271 ms · 2026-05-13T17:50:43.978481+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

This separation of energy and temperature scales supports a two-stage picture in which a kagome flat band first undergoes correlation-driven splitting into lower and upper Hubbard bands, and the occupied lower Hubbard band supplies the local moments that later hybridize with itinerant electrons at lower temperature.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the robust and ubiquitous temperature-independent ±50 mV humps... with the ARPES data, the hump located at approximately –50 mV can be naturally associated with the β band, which we identify as the LHB

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

Heavy fermions and the kondo lattice: a 21st century perspective,

P. Coleman, “Heavy fermions and the kondo lattice: a 21st century perspective,” (2015), arXiv:1509.05769 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2015
[2]

Kirchner, S

S. Kirchner, S. Paschen, Q. Chen, S. Wirth, D. Feng, J. D. Thompson, and Q. Si, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 011002 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

W. Xie, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, C. Guo, J. Xu, X. Lu, and H. Yuan, Acta Physica Sinica 68, 177101 (2019)

work page 2019
[4]

S. Raj, Y. Iida, S. Souma, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, H. Ding, S. Ohara, T. Hayakawa, G. F. Chen, I. Sakamoto, and H. Harima, Phys. Rev. B 71, 224516 (2005)

work page 2005
[5]

Fujimori, A

S. Fujimori, A. Fujimori, K. Shimada, T. Narimura, K. Kobayashi, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, H. Harima, H. Shishido, S. Ikeda, D. Aoki, Y. Tokiwa, Y. Haga, and Y. Ōnuki, Phys. Rev. B 73, 224517 (2006)

work page 2006
[6]

Kummer, S

K. Kummer, S. Patil, A. Chikina, M. Güttler, M. Höppner, A. Generalov, S. Danzenbächer, S. Seiro, A. Hannaske, C. Krellner, Y. Kucherenko, M. Shi, M. Radovic, E. Rienks, G. Zwick- nagl, K. Matho, J. W. Allen, C. Laubschat, C. Geibel, and D. V. Vyalikh, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011028 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

W. K. Park, P. H. Tobash, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, and L. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 246403 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

W. Zhao, B. Shen, Z. Tao, Z. Han, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature 616, 61 (2023)

work page 2023
[9]

K. Fan, H. Jin, B. Huang, G. Duan, R. Yu, Z.-Y. Liu, H.-N. Xia, L.-S. Liu, Y. Zhang, T. Xie, Q.-Y. Tang, G. Chen, W.-H. Zhang, F. C. Chen, X. Luo, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and Y.-S. Fu, Nature Communications 15, 8797 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

V. Vaňo, M. Amini, S. C. Ganguli, G. Chen, J. L. Lado, S. Kezilebieke, and P. Liljeroth, Nature 599, 582 (2021)

work page 2021
[11]

Khadka, T

D. Khadka, T. R. Thapaliya, S. H. Parra, X. Han, J. Wen, R. F. Need, P. Khanal, W. Wang, J. Zang, J. M. Kikkawa, L. Wu, and S. X. Huang, Science Advances 6, eabc1977 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Shimizu, H

Y. Shimizu, H. Takeda, M. Tanaka, M. Itoh, S. Niitaka, and H. Takagi, Nature Communica- tions 3, 981 (2012)

work page 2012
[13]

L. Ye, S. Fang, M. Kang, J. Kaufmann, Y. Lee, C. John, P. M. Neves, S. Y. F. Zhao, J. Den- 16 linger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, D. C. Bell, O. Janson, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Nature Physics 20, 610 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

S. S. Zhang, J. Yin, M. Ikhlas, H.-J. Tien, R. Wang, N. Shumiya, G. Chang, S. S. Tsirkin, Y. Shi, C. Yi, Z. Guguchia, H. Li, W. Wang, T. Chang, Z. Wang, Y. Yang, T. Neupert, S. Nakatsuji, and M. Z. Hasan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 046401 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

J. G. Checkelsky, B. A. Bernevig, P. Coleman, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, Nature Reviews Materials 9, 509 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Wang, Phys

Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035127 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

Syôzi, Progress of Theoretical Physics 6, 306 (1951)

I. Syôzi, Progress of Theoretical Physics 6, 306 (1951)

work page 1951
[18]

J. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature 612, 647 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Y. Wang, H. Wu, G. T. McCandless, J. Y. Chan, and M. N. Ali, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 635 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

B. Song, Y. Xie, W.-J. Li, H. Liu, J. Chen, S. Tian, X. Zhang, Q. Wang, X. Li, H. Lei, Q. Zhang, J.-g. Guo, L. Zhao, S.-L. Yu, X. Zhou, X. Chen, and T. Ying, Nature Communi- cations 16, 5643 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Emergent dynamical kondo coherence and competing magnetic order in a correlated kagome flat-band metal CsCr 6Sb6,

X. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Jiao, R. Zhang, K. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Ye, Z. Yu, C. Jiang, X. Wang, L. Shu, B. Lv, G. Li, and Y. Guo, “Emergent dynamical kondo coherence and competing magnetic order in a correlated kagome flat-band metal CsCr 6Sb6,” (2025)

work page 2025
[22]

Wang, Y.-X

Z. Wang, Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, Y. Li, G.-Y. Wang, H.-L. Huang, S. Shao, J. Liu, P. Zhu, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, H. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Duan, X. Li, G. Chang, P. Dai, Z. Ye, G. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Zheng, J. Jia, M. Z. Hasan, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075148 (2021)

work page 2021
[23]

H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Nature 599, 222 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Liang, X

Z. Liang, X. Hou, F. Zhang, W. Ma, P. Wu, Z. Zhang, F. Yu, J.-J. Ying, K. Jiang, L. Shan, Z. Wang, and X.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031026 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

A. K. Kundu, X. Huang, E. Seewald, E. Ritz, S. Pakhira, S. Zhang, D. Sun, S. Turkel, S. Shabani, T. Yilmaz, E. Vescovo, C. R. Dean, D. C. Johnston, T. Valla, T. Birol, D. N. Basov, R. M. Fernandes, and A. N. Pasupathy, Nature Communications 15, 5008 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

J. Yu, Z. Xu, K. Xiao, Y. Yuan, Q. Yin, Z. Hu, C. Gong, Y. Guo, Z. Tu, P. Tang, H. Lei, Q.-K. Xue, and W. Li, Nano Letters 22, 918 (2022) . 17

work page 2022
[27]

Fano, Phys

U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961)

work page 1961
[28]

Madhavan, W

V. Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie, N. S. Wingreen, and N. S. Wingreen, Science 280, 567 (1998)

work page 1998
[29]

Figgins and D

J. Figgins and D. K. Morr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 187202 (2010)

work page 2010
[30]

A. R. Schmidt, M. H. Hamidian, P. Wahl, F. Meier, A. V. Balatsky, J. D. Garrett, T. J. Williams, G. M. Luke, and J. C. Davis, Nature 465, 570 (2010)

work page 2010
[31]

W. Ruan, C. Ye, M. Guo, F. Chen, X. Chen, G.-M. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 136401 (2014)

work page 2014
[32]

Zhang, W

Y. Zhang, W. Feng, X. Lou, T. Yu, X. Zhu, S. Tan, B. Yuan, Y. Liu, H. Lu, D. Xie, Q. Liu, W. Zhang, X. Luo, Y. Huang, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, X. Lai, and Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045128 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

Zhang, H

Y. Zhang, H. Lu, X. Zhu, S. Tan, W. Feng, Q. Liu, W. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Luo, D. Xie, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, and X. Lai, Science Advances 4, eaao6791 (2018)

work page 2018
[34]

Ernst, S

S. Ernst, S. Kirchner, C. Krellner, C. Geibel, G. Zwicknagl, F. Steglich, and S. Wirth, Nature 474, 362 (2011)

work page 2011
[35]

Aynajian, E

P. Aynajian, E. H. da Silva Neto, A. Gyenis, R. E. Baumbach, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, and A. Bauer, Eric D. Yazdani, Nature 486, 201 (2012)

work page 2012
[36]

Nagaoka, T

K. Nagaoka, T. Jamneala, M. Grobis, and M. F. Crommie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077205 (2002)

work page 2002
[37]

C. Chen, J. Zheng, Y. He, X. Ying, S. Sankar, L. Li, Y. Wei, X. Dai, H. C. Po, and B. Jäck, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06933 (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2409.06933 , arXiv:2409.06933 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.06933 2024
[38]

T. Qin, X. Wang, J. Wang, X. Li, S. You, Z. Wang, J. Zhu, F. Liu, L. Chi, and M. Pan, National Science Review , nwaf574 (2025) , https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article- pdf/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaf574/65883440/nwaf574.pdf

work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf574/65883440/nwaf574.pdf 2025
[39]

Y. Hu, X. X. Wu, B. R. Ortiz, S. L. Ju, X. L. Han, J. Z. Ma, N. C. Plumb, M. Radovic, R. Thomale, S. D. Wilson, A. P. Schnyder, and M. Shi, Nature Communications 13, 2220 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

Y. Hu, A. P. Wu, Xianxin Schnyder, and M. Shi, npj Quantum Materials 8, 37 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions , Cambridge Studies in Magnetism (Cambridge University Press, 1993). 18

work page 1993
[42]

Q. C. Yun Zhang, Shiyong Tan, Physics 49, 611 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

Zhang, X

Y. Zhang, X. Luo, W. Feng, S. Tan, Q. Hao, Q. Zhang, D. Yuan, B. Wang, Y. Liu, Q. Liu, X. Wang, L. Luo, X. Zhu, Q. Chen, and X. Lai, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045133 (2022)

work page 2022
[44]

Q. Y. Chen, D. F. Xu, X. H. Niu, J. Jiang, R. Peng, H. C. Xu, C. H. P. Wen, Z. F. Ding, K. Huang, L. Shu, Y. J. Zhang, H. Lee, V. N. Strocov, M. Shi, F. Bisti, T. Schmitt, Y. B. Huang, P. Dudin, X. C. Lai, S. Kirchner, H. Q. Yuan, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045107 (2017)

work page 2017
[45]

Q. Y. Chen, X. B. Luo, D. H. Xie, M. L. Li, X. Y. Ji, R. Zhou, Y. B. Huang, W. Zhang, W. Feng, Y. Zhang, L. Huang, Q. Q. Hao, Q. Liu, X. G. Zhu, Y. Liu, P. Zhang, X. C. Lai, Q. Si, and S. Y. Tan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 106402 (2019)

work page 2019
[46]

Zhang, H

W. Zhang, H. Y. Lu, D. H. Xie, W. Feng, S. Y. Tan, Y. Liu, X. G. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Q. Q. Hao, Y. B. Huang, X. C. Lai, and Q. Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115121 (2018)

work page 2018
[47]

Q. Y. Chen, D. F. Xu, X. H. Niu, R. Peng, H. C. Xu, C. H. P. Wen, X. Liu, L. Shu, S. Y. Tan, X. C. Lai, Y. J. Zhang, H. Lee, V. N. Strocov, F. Bisti, P. Dudin, J.-X. Zhu, H. Q. Yuan, S. Kirchner, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 066403 (2018)

work page 2018
[48]

Damascelli, Z

A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)

work page 2003
[49]

S. Gao, S. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Yan, X. Han, X. Ji, W. Tao, J. Liu, T. Wang, S. Yuan, G. Qu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Huang, M. Pan, S. Peng, Y. Hu, H. Li, Y. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Meng, L. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, Z. Chen, M. Shi, H. Ding, H. Yang, K. Jiang, Y. Li, H. Lei, Y. Shi, H. Weng, and T. Qian, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041049 (2023)

work page 2023
[50]

Brandow, Advances in Physics 26, 651 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737700101443

B. Brandow, Advances in Physics 26, 651 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737700101443

work page doi:10.1080/00018737700101443 1977
[51]

Imada, A

M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998)

work page 1998
[52]

A. O. Fumega and J. L. Lado, Nano Letters 24, 4272 (2024)

work page 2024
[53]

Giannakis, J

I. Giannakis, J. Leshen, M. Kavai, S. Ran, C. J. Kang, S. R. Saha, Y. Zhao, Z. Xu, J. W. Lynn, L. Miao, L. A. Wray, G. Kotliar, N. P. Butch, and P. Aynajian, Science Advances 5, eaaw9061 (2019)

work page 2019
[54]

G. Liu, G. Wang, Y. Zhu, H. Zhang, G. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, H. Liu, L. Zhao, J. Meng, X. Dong, C. Chen, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou, Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 023105 (2008)

work page 2008
[55]

T. Miao, Y. Xu, B. Liang, W. Zhu, N. Cai, M. Xu, D. Wu, H. Gu, W. Mao, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, Z. Xu, Z. Zhu, X. Li, H. Mao, L. Zhao, G. Liu, and 19 X. J. Zhou, Review of Scientific Instruments 97, 033908 (2026). 20 FIG. 1. Crystal structure and transport properties of CsCr 6Sb6. (a) Side view of the crystal structure. The green and...

work page 2026
[56]

As shown in Fig

Ubiquity of the gap feature and ±50 mV humps in CsCr 6Sb6 single crystals To verify the reproducibility of the gap feature and the ±50 mV humps, we performed STM/STS measurements using different instruments and tip calibration procedures (see Methods). As shown in Fig. S1, sample 1 was measured with a PtIr tip calibrated on an Ag(111) with a Unisoku USM-1...

work page
[57]

S7 and Fig

Temperature-evolution of the electronic structure probed by STS and ARPES Key manifestations of Kondo hybridization in this system are reflected in the tempera- ture evolution of the electronic structure, which are consistently observed across independent experiments, as illustrated in Fig. S7 and Fig. S9. As shown in Fig. S7, the tunneling spec- tra on S...

work page