pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04368 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.NI

OrbitTransit: Traffic Delivery and Diffusion for Earth Observation via Satellite Mobility

Haoyuan Zhao , Long Chen , Yi Ching Chou , Hao Fang , Jiangchuan Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords satellite networksearth observationinter-satellite linkspickup-carry-offloadtraffic diffusionenergy minimizationground station balancingdata delivery
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

OrbitTransit combines satellite mobility for pickup-carry-offload with inter-satellite diffusion to find hybrid paths that cut energy use and balance ground station traffic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces OrbitTransit to manage rising volumes of Earth observation data from low Earth orbit satellites. Ground stations suffer congestion from uneven placement and high data flows, while existing inter-satellite link methods struggle with contention and energy costs from long routes. The method models satellite orbits as nodes and uses contention-avoidant rules to pick the best mix of carrying data aboard one satellite and forwarding via links to others. This produces paths that lower satellite energy drain and spread traffic more evenly across ground stations.

Core claim

OrbitTransit establishes that an orbit-as-node framework together with contention-avoidant delivery can jointly select optimal hybrid pickup-carry-offload and inter-satellite link paths. These paths minimize satellite energy consumption for data movement while balancing traffic loads at ground stations. Experiments confirm the approach lowers battery consumption by 47.16 percent, reduces task failures by a factor of 1.09, and improves load balance compared with prior ground station selection and routing methods.

What carries the argument

The orbit-as-node framework that treats satellite positions and mobility patterns as network nodes, paired with a contention-avoidant delivery algorithm to compute hybrid PCO-ISL paths.

If this is right

  • Hybrid PCO-ISL paths reduce satellite battery consumption for data delivery.
  • Inter-satellite diffusion balances traffic loads across ground stations.
  • Avoidance of contended delivery points lowers the rate of failed data tasks.
  • Shorter reliance on inter-satellite links supports more sustainable network operation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mobility-based routing could extend to other delay-tolerant satellite services such as communications or remote sensing.
  • Larger satellite constellations would increase the number of available carry options and likely amplify the reported energy reductions.
  • Ground station planners could use predicted orbit paths to decide where to add new stations for maximum relief.

Load-bearing premise

Satellite mobility patterns and traffic demands stay predictable enough to allow reliable pickup-carry-offload without data loss or excessive delays, while inter-satellite links can spread traffic without creating new contention or added energy costs.

What would settle it

A test case with high traffic volume where many satellites lack access to an uncongested ground station within their carry window, producing either data loss, delays beyond tolerance, or higher total energy use than the claimed savings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04368 by Hao Fang, Haoyuan Zhao, Jiangchuan Liu, Long Chen, Yi Ching Chou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the typical backhaul path in Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Number of assigned tasks and queuing delays [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The distribution of ground station coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Satellite onboard disk usage ratios across or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Shift in orbital ground tracks caused by Earth’s rotation. massive numbers of edge connectivity and node position up￾dates, which substantially complicate both problem modeling and the solution design. Spatiotemporal dynamics of GSL links. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Number of GSL switches from satellite and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Constraints and trade-offs in ISL-PCO hybrid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a) Satellite-level modeling; (b) Orbit-as-node [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: A traffic diffu￾sion instance. PCO in 5 mins 10 mins 15 mins Optimal Optimal Traffic collision 1 0 -1 -2 5 0 0 0 12 12 Satellites location at time X Concurrent ISL transfer Orbital resources contention X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Overall comparison of all baseline combinations across four key evaluation metrics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Cumulative distribution of failed delivery tasks categorized by failure reason. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Satellite disk usage ratio under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Baseline performance under different constellation configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Trade-off between the number of break￾points, approximation error, and memory usage in the linearized energy model. value of 𝛼 subject to constraint (17) as well as the nested constraints on 𝑥 and 𝑦 described in §4. Linear interpolation for energy model. The life con￾sumption function in Eq. 9 includes an exponential term in Euler’s number, which cannot be handled directly by linear programming. To linear… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Sensitivity of OrbitTransit to data plane de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_24.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The emerging demand for Earth observation (EO) to address environmental challenges has driven unprecedented growth in its primary carrier, Low Earth Orbit satellites, in recent years. Ground stations (GSs), the egress points of these networks, are congested due to the massive volume of EO traffic, and their deployment is constrained by geographic, political, and budgetary factors. Although inter-satellite links (ISLs) can partially relieve this congestion by forwarding traffic to alternative GSs, existing ISL-based approaches can hardly address traffic contention caused by biased GS distribution and may also raise sustainability concerns due to prolonged ISL paths. In this paper, we propose OrbitTransit, a pickup-carry-offload (PCO) approach that leverages satellite mobility for data \textit{delivery} and integrates ISLs for traffic \textit{diffusion} to alleviate the resource contention inherent in PCO delivery. The proposed orbit-as-node framework and contention-avoidant delivery jointly determine the optimal hybrid PCO-ISL path, minimizing energy consumption and balancing GS traffic. Extensive experiments show that OrbitTransit reduces battery consumption by $47.16\%$, decreases task failures by $1.09\times$, and improves GS load balancing compared with state-of-the-art GS selection and routing algorithms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes OrbitTransit, a pickup-carry-offload (PCO) framework for Earth observation traffic in LEO satellite networks. It combines satellite mobility for data delivery with inter-satellite links (ISLs) for traffic diffusion to relieve ground station (GS) congestion. An orbit-as-node model and contention-avoidant strategy select hybrid PCO-ISL paths that minimize energy consumption while balancing GS load. The authors report that extensive experiments demonstrate a 47.16% reduction in battery consumption, 1.09× fewer task failures, and improved GS load balancing relative to prior GS selection and routing algorithms.

Significance. If the performance gains hold under realistic conditions, the hybrid mobility-plus-ISL approach could meaningfully alleviate GS bottlenecks in expanding LEO constellations and improve energy efficiency for EO missions. The orbit-as-node abstraction offers a clean way to reason about path selection, and the emphasis on contention avoidance is a useful addition to existing ISL or pure-PCO methods.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Experimental Evaluation section] The central quantitative claims (47.16% battery reduction and 1.09× failure reduction) rest on experimental results whose methodology, traffic models, orbital dynamics, buffer capacities, and handling of data loss or timing violations are not described in the abstract or summary. This is load-bearing for the optimality argument because the weakest assumption—that PCO carry phases and ISL diffusion incur no loss, overflow, or added contention—must be validated; without simulation parameters, sensitivity analysis, or bounds, it is impossible to determine whether the reported gains survive realistic perturbations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a single sentence summarizing the evaluation setup (e.g., number of satellites, traffic generation, or comparison baselines) to allow readers to gauge the scope of the claimed improvements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential of the hybrid PCO-ISL approach in alleviating ground station congestion. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Experimental Evaluation section] The central quantitative claims (47.16% battery reduction and 1.09× failure reduction) rest on experimental results whose methodology, traffic models, orbital dynamics, buffer capacities, and handling of data loss or timing violations are not described in the abstract or summary. This is load-bearing for the optimality argument because the weakest assumption—that PCO carry phases and ISL diffusion incur no loss, overflow, or added contention—must be validated; without simulation parameters, sensitivity analysis, or bounds, it is impossible to determine whether the reported gains survive realistic perturbations.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is necessarily concise and omits detailed experimental parameters, which are instead provided in the Experimental Evaluation section. To address this, we will revise the abstract to include a brief summary of the key simulation elements (traffic models, orbital dynamics, and buffer settings) while preserving length constraints. We will also add a dedicated sensitivity analysis subsection that quantifies robustness to variations in buffer capacity, link error rates (modeling data loss), and timing violations, providing explicit bounds on the reported gains when the no-loss/no-overflow assumptions are relaxed. This directly validates the contention-avoidant strategy under more realistic conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on novel framework and external experimental comparisons

full rationale

The paper proposes an orbit-as-node framework combining PCO delivery with ISL diffusion to select hybrid paths minimizing energy and balancing load. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce to self-definition or prior self-citations. Optimality is asserted via comparative simulations against state-of-the-art GS selection and routing algorithms, with quantitative gains (battery reduction, failure decrease) reported as empirical outcomes rather than constructed by construction from inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; central claim rests on unstated assumptions about mobility reliability and traffic patterns.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Satellite orbits and contact opportunities can be modeled accurately enough to plan reliable data carrying paths
    Core premise of the pickup-carry-offload mechanism

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1104 out tokens · 36542 ms · 2026-05-10T20:19:59.221935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    California fires and conditions that made them more likely tied to climate change

    Evan Bush. California fires and conditions that made them more likely tied to climate change. https://www .nbcnews.com/science/climate- change/california-fires-conditions-more-likely-climate-change- rcna189696

    work page

  2. [2]

    Network characteristics of leo satellite constel- lations: A starlink-based measurement from end users

    Sami Ma, Yi Ching Chou, Haoyuan Zhao, Long Chen, Xiaoqiang Ma, and Jiangchuan Liu. Network characteristics of leo satellite constel- lations: A starlink-based measurement from end users. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    A multifac- eted look at starlink performance

    Nitinder Mohan, Andrew E Ferguson, Hendrik Cech, Rohan Bose, Prakita Rayyan Renatin, Mahesh K Marina, and Jörg Ott. A multifac- eted look at starlink performance. InProc. ACM WWW, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Landsat 8

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Landsat 8. https:// landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellites/landsat-8/, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    In a first for nesdis, jpss ground program moves its data to the cloud

    National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NES- DIS). In a first for nesdis, jpss ground program moves its data to the cloud. https://www .nesdis.noaa.gov/news/first-nesdis-jpss-ground- program-moves-its-data-the-cloud, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Visible infrared imaging ra- diometer suite (viirs)

    National Calibration Center, NESDIS. Visible infrared imaging ra- diometer suite (viirs). https://ncc.nesdis.noaa.gov/VIIRS/, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Stable hierarchical routing for operational leo networks

    Yuanjie Li, Lixin Liu, Hewu Li, Wei Liu, Yimei Chen, Wei Zhao, Jianping Wu, Qian Wu, Jun Liu, and Zeqi Lai. Stable hierarchical routing for operational leo networks. InProc. ACM MobiCom, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Trans- mitting, fast and slow: Scheduling satellite traffic through space and time

    Bill Tao, Maleeha Masood, Indranil Gupta, and Deepak Vasisht. Trans- mitting, fast and slow: Scheduling satellite traffic through space and time. InProc. ACM MobiCom, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Oneweb gateways require complex hughes engineering

    Hughes Network Systems. Oneweb gateways require complex hughes engineering. https://www .hughes.com/resources/insights/satellite- broadband/oneweb-gateways-require-complex-hughes- engineering

    work page

  10. [10]

    Realtime multimedia services over starlink: A reality check

    Haoyuan Zhao, Hao Fang, Feng Wang, and Jiangchuan Liu. Realtime multimedia services over starlink: A reality check. InProc. ACM NOSSDA V, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    near space network

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. “near space network”. https://www.nasa.gov/near-space-network/, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    what is the near space network?

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. “what is the near space network?”. https://www.nasa.gov/technology/space-comms/ what-is-the-near-space-network/, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Commercial dishes can be my ladder: Sustainable and collaborative data offloading in leo satellite networks

    Yi Ching Chou, Long Chen, Hengzhi Wang, Feng Wang, Hao Fang, Haoyuan Zhao, Miao Zhang, and Xiaoyi Fan. Commercial dishes can be my ladder: Sustainable and collaborative data offloading in leo satellite networks. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    L2d2: Low latency distributed downlink for leo satellites

    Deepak Vasisht, Jayanth Shenoy, and Ranveer Chandra. L2d2: Low latency distributed downlink for leo satellites. InProc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Processing-while-transmitting: Cost-minimized transmission in sdn-based stins.IEEE/ACM TON, 2021

    Xu Li, Feilong Tang, Yanmin Zhu, Luoyi Fu, Jiadi Yu, Long Chen, and Jiacheng Liu. Processing-while-transmitting: Cost-minimized transmission in sdn-based stins.IEEE/ACM TON, 2021

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Achieving resilient and performance- guaranteed routing in space-terrestrial integrated networks

    Zeqi Lai, Hewu Li, Yikun Wang, Qian Wu, Yangtao Deng, Jun Liu, Yuanjie Li, and Jianping Wu. Achieving resilient and performance- guaranteed routing in space-terrestrial integrated networks. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Satcp: Link-layer informed tcp adapta- tion for highly dynamic leo satellite networks

    Xuyang Cao and Xinyu Zhang. Satcp: Link-layer informed tcp adapta- tion for highly dynamic leo satellite networks. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    In-orbit processing or not? sunlight-aware task scheduling for energy-efficient space edge computing networks

    Weisen Liu, Zeqi Lai, Qian Wu, Hewu Li, Qi Zhang, Zonglun Li, Yuan- jie Li, and Jun Liu. In-orbit processing or not? sunlight-aware task scheduling for energy-efficient space edge computing networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    On-demand and scalable topology control service for leo satellite network evolving.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    Long Chen, Yi Ching Chou, Haoyuan Zhao, Hengzhi Wang, Feng Wang, Hao Fang, Sami Ma, Feilong Tang, Linghe Kong, and Jiangchuan Liu. On-demand and scalable topology control service for leo satellite network evolving.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Time-varying resource graph based resource model for space- terrestrial integrated networks

    Long Chen, Feilong Tang, Zhetao Li, Laurence T Yang, Jiadi Yu, and Bin Yao. Time-varying resource graph based resource model for space- terrestrial integrated networks. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Scot20 data sheet

    TESAT-Spacecom. Scot20 data sheet. https://satsearch.co/products/ tesat-scot20-smallsat-optical-communication-terminal, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Near real-time versus standard products

    NASA Earthdata. Near real-time versus standard products. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/earth-observation-data- basics/near-real-time-versus-standard-products, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Spacebelt data security as a service

    Cloud Constellation Corporation. Spacebelt data security as a service. https://spacebelt.com/, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Envisioned wireless big data storage for low-earth-orbit satellite-based cloud.IEEE Wireless Communications, 2018

    Huawei Huang, Song Guo, and Kun Wang. Envisioned wireless big data storage for low-earth-orbit satellite-based cloud.IEEE Wireless Communications, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Spacex services, inc

    Federal Communications Commission. Spacex services, inc. fcc filings. https://fcc.report/company/SpaceX-Services-Inc, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Public Notice: Authoriza- tion for 40 technically identical 1.85 m antennas to communicate with the Starlink NGSO satellite system

    Federal Communications Commission. Public Notice: Authoriza- tion for 40 technically identical 1.85 m antennas to communicate with the Starlink NGSO satellite system. https://docs .fcc.gov/public/ attachments/DOC-409643A1.pdf, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Starlink launch statistics

    Jonathan McDowell. Starlink launch statistics. https://planet4589 .org/ space/con/star/stats.html

    work page

  28. [28]

    Seco: Multi-satellite edge computing enabled wide-area and real-time earth observation missions

    Zhiwei Zhai, Liekang Zeng, Tao Ouyang, Shuai Yu, Qianyi Huang, and Xu Chen. Seco: Multi-satellite edge computing enabled wide-area and real-time earth observation missions. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Computing-aware routing for leo satellite networks: A transmission and computation integration approach.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2023

    Jiaqi Cao, Shengli Zhang, Qingxia Chen, Houtian Wang, Mingzhe Wang, and Naijin Liu. Computing-aware routing for leo satellite networks: A transmission and computation integration approach.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Low earth orbit satellite security and reliability: Issues, solutions, and the road ahead.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023

    Pingyue Yue, Jianping An, Jiankang Zhang, Jia Ye, Gaofeng Pan, Shuai Wang, Pei Xiao, and Lajos Hanzo. Low earth orbit satellite security and reliability: Issues, solutions, and the road ahead.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Democratizing leo satellite network measure- ment.Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Com- puting Systems, 2024

    Liz Izhikevich, Manda Tran, Katherine Izhikevich, Gautam Akiwate, and Zakir Durumeric. Democratizing leo satellite network measure- ment.Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Com- puting Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Robust live streaming over leo satellite constellations: Measurement, analysis, and handover- aware adaptation

    Hao Fang, Haoyuan Zhao, Jianxin Shi, Miao Zhang, Guanzhen Wu, Yi Ching Chou, Feng Wang, and Jiangchuan Liu. Robust live streaming over leo satellite constellations: Measurement, analysis, and handover- aware adaptation. InProc. ACM MM, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Baroc: Concealing packet losses in lsns with bimodal behavior awareness for livecast ingestion

    Haoyuan Zhao, Jianxin Shi, Guanzhen Wu, Hao Fang, Yi Ching Chou, Long Chen, Feng Wang, and Jiangchuan Liu. Baroc: Concealing packet losses in lsns with bimodal behavior awareness for livecast ingestion. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Starstream: Live video analytics over space networking

    Miao Zhang, Jiaxing Li, Haoyuan Zhao, Linfeng Shen, and Jiangchuan Liu. Starstream: Live video analytics over space networking. InProc. ACM MM, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Low-latency live video streaming over a low-earth-orbit satellite network with dash

    Jinwei Zhao and Jianping Pan. Low-latency live video streaming over a low-earth-orbit satellite network with dash. InProc. ACM MMsys, 2024. Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Haoyuan Zhao, Long Chen, Yi Ching Chou, Hao Fang, and Jiangchuan Liu

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    (SpaceX)

    Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX). Starshield. https: //www.spacex.com/starshield, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Nasa’s push toward commercial space communications gains momentum

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Nasa’s push toward commercial space communications gains momentum. https://www.nasa.gov/technology/space-comms/nasas-push- toward-commercial-space-communications-gains-momentum, 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Near space network (nsn) user’s guide

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Near space network (nsn) user’s guide. https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/APSMEX25/SMEX/ pdf_files/Prog05c_NSN_UsersGuide.pdf, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    spacex’s starshield shapes the earth observation and national security industries

    Logan Misturado. “spacex’s starshield shapes the earth observation and national security industries”. https://spacesecurity.wse.jhu.edu/ 2024/09/23/spacexs-starshield-shapes-the-earth-observation-and- national-security-industries/, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    the impact of spacex starshield on commercial earth observation companies

    New Space Economy. “the impact of spacex starshield on commercial earth observation companies”. https://newspaceeconomy .ca/ 2024/09/20/the-impact-of-spacex-starshield-on-commercial-earth- observation-companies/, 2024

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    remote sensing and target acquisition with starlink satellites

    Fraunhofer Institute for High Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques (FHR). “remote sensing and target acquisition with starlink satellites”. https://www.fhr.fraunhofer.de/en/sections/Multifunctional-RF-and- Radar-Systems-MFR/Remote-sensing-and-target-acquisition-with- Starlink-satellites-JB2022.html, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Towards energy- efficient routing in satellite networks.IEEE JSAC, 2016

    Yuan Yang, Mingwei Xu, Dan Wang, and Yu Wang. Towards energy- efficient routing in satellite networks.IEEE JSAC, 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Delay-optimal cooperation transmission in remote sensing satellite networks.IEEE TMC, 2022

    Long Chen, Feilong Tang, Xu Li, Jiacheng Liu, Yanqin Yang, Jiadi Yu, and Yanmin Zhu. Delay-optimal cooperation transmission in remote sensing satellite networks.IEEE TMC, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Stableroute: When dijkstra’s algorithm meets topology-varying satellite networks

    Tian Pan, Guohao Ruan, Qiang Fu, Zhengjie Luo, Junkai Huang, Xing- shuang Luo, and Tao Huang. Stableroute: When dijkstra’s algorithm meets topology-varying satellite networks. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Dr. T.S. Kelso. Celestrak: Satellite tracking and orbital data. https: //celestrak.org/, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Census from heaven: An estimate of the global human population using night-time satellite imagery.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001

    Paul Sutton, Dar Roberts, Christopher Elvidge, and Kimberly Baugh. Census from heaven: An estimate of the global human population using night-time satellite imagery.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001

    work page 2001

  47. [47]

    400g zr, openzr+ and open roadm

    PacketLight Networks. 400g zr, openzr+ and open roadm. https://www.packetlight.com/resources/articles/400g-zr-openzr- openroadm, 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Nisar mission — observatory overview

    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Nisar mission — observatory overview. https://nisar.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/observatory/overview/, 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Ultra-dense leo satellite constellations: How many leo satellites do we need?IEEE TWC, 2021

    Ruoqi Deng, Boya Di, Hongliang Zhang, Linling Kuang, and Lingyang Song. Ultra-dense leo satellite constellations: How many leo satellites do we need?IEEE TWC, 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Load-adaptive and energy-efficient topology control in leo mega-constellation networks

    Long Chen, Feilong Tang, Linghe Kong, Rui Li, Zhi Hou, Jiacheng Liu, Xu Li, and Song Guo. Load-adaptive and energy-efficient topology control in leo mega-constellation networks. InProc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    × grid: A location-oriented topology design for leo satellites

    Joseph Mclaughlin, Jee Choi, and Ramakrishnan Durairajan. × grid: A location-oriented topology design for leo satellites. InProc. 1st ACM Workshop on LEO Networking and Communication, 2023

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Topological dynamics characterization for leo satellite networks.ScienceDirect Computer Networks, 2007

    Junfeng Wang, Lei Li, and Mingtian Zhou. Topological dynamics characterization for leo satellite networks.ScienceDirect Computer Networks, 2007

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    Ccsds overview

    Mike Kearney. Ccsds overview. https://ntrs .nasa.gov/api/citations/ 20150002579/downloads/20150002579.pdf, 2014

    work page arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Earth science mis- sion operations (esmo)

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Earth science mis- sion operations (esmo). https://www.nasa.gov/goddard/earth-science- projects-division/esmo/, 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Kongsberg Satellite Services Inc., Contract 1332KP24C00009, 2025

    A network approach to ground station services: Final report prepared for noaa ground processing demonstration (gpd). Kongsberg Satellite Services Inc., Contract 1332KP24C00009, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Satguard: Concealing endless and bursty packet losses in leo satellite networks for delay-sensitive web applications

    Jihao Li, Hewu Li, Zeqi Lai, Qian Wu, Yijie Liu, Qi Zhang, Yuanjie Li, and Jun Liu. Satguard: Concealing endless and bursty packet losses in leo satellite networks for delay-sensitive web applications. InProc. ACM WWW, 2024

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    A networking perspective on starlink’s self-driving leo mega-constellation

    Yuanjie Li, Hewu Li, Wei Liu, Lixin Liu, Wei Zhao, Yimei Chen, Jianping Wu, Qian Wu, Jun Liu, Zeqi Lai, et al. A networking perspective on starlink’s self-driving leo mega-constellation. InProc. ACM MobiCom, 2023

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Rh3440 solid-state data recorder

    Mercury Systems, Inc. Rh3440 solid-state data recorder. https://www.mrcy.com/application/files/5216/3001/4013/ 5008.22E_RH3440_3U_VPX_SRIO_SSDR.pdf, 2021

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Wildfire detection in the us and canada within a minute of satellite observation

    NASA Earthdata. Wildfire detection in the us and canada within a minute of satellite observation. https://wiki .earthdata.nasa.gov/ display/FIRMS/2022/07/14/Wildfire+detection+in+the+US+and+ Canada+within+a+minute+of+satellite+observation, 2022

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Pulp: A python linear pro- gramming modeler

    Stuart Mitchell, Anita Kean, Andrew Mason, Michael O’Sullivan, Antony Phillips, and Franco Peschiera. Pulp: A python linear pro- gramming modeler. https://coin-or.github.io/pulp/

    work page

  61. [61]

    Network topology design at 27,000 km/hour

    Debopam Bhattacherjee and Ankit Singla. Network topology design at 27,000 km/hour. InProc. ACM CoNEXT, 2019

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    internet from space

    Yannick Hauri, Debopam Bhattacherjee, Manuel Grossmann, and Ankit Singla. "internet from space" without inter-satellite links. In Proc. ACM HotNets, 2020

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    A community-driven approach to democratize access to satellite ground stations

    Vaibhav Singh, Akarsh Prabhakara, Diana Zhang, Osman Yağan, and Swarun Kumar. A community-driven approach to democratize access to satellite ground stations. InProc. ACM MobiCom, 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    A browser-side view of starlink connectivity

    Mohamed M Kassem, Aravindh Raman, Diego Perino, and Nishanth Sastry. A browser-side view of starlink connectivity. InProc. ACM IMC, 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    A first look at starlink performance

    François Michel, Martino Trevisan, Danilo Giordano, and Olivier Bonaventure. A first look at starlink performance. InProc. ACM IMC, 2022

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Making sense of constellations: Methodolo- gies for understanding starlink’s scheduling algorithms

    Hammas Bin Tanveer, Mike Puchol, Rachee Singh, Antonio Bianchi, and Rishab Nithyanand. Making sense of constellations: Methodolo- gies for understanding starlink’s scheduling algorithms. InProc. ACM CoNEXT, 2023

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Spacertc: Unleashing the low-latency potential of mega-constellations for real-time communications

    Zeqi Lai, Weisen Liu, Qian Wu, Hewu Li, Jingxi Xu, and Jianping Wu. Spacertc: Unleashing the low-latency potential of mega-constellations for real-time communications. InProc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2022

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Cosmac: Constellation-aware medium access and scheduling for iot satellites

    Jayanth Shenoy, Om Chabra, Tusher Chakraborty, Suraj Jog, Deepak Vasisht, and Ranveer Chandra. Cosmac: Constellation-aware medium access and scheduling for iot satellites. InProc. ACM MobiCom, 2024

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Known knowns and unknowns: Near-realtime earth observation via query bifurcation in serval

    Bill Tao, Om Chabra, Ishani Janveja, Indranil Gupta, and Deepak Va- sisht. Known knowns and unknowns: Near-realtime earth observation via query bifurcation in serval. InProc. USENIX NSDI, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Fireloc: Low-latency multi-modal wildfire geolocation

    Xiao Fu, Yue Hu, Prashanth Sutrave, Peter A Beerel, and Barath Ragha- van. Fireloc: Low-latency multi-modal wildfire geolocation. InProc. of the ACM Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Multi-functional time ex- panded graph: A unified graph model for communication, storage, and computation for dynamic networks over time.IEEE JSAC, 2023

    Wei Liu, Huiting Yang, and Jiandong Li. Multi-functional time ex- panded graph: A unified graph model for communication, storage, and computation for dynamic networks over time.IEEE JSAC, 2023

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Fire infor- mation for resource management system (firms)

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Fire infor- mation for resource management system (firms). https:// www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/firms, 2025

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    Firms adds ultra real- time data from modis and viirs

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Firms adds ultra real- time data from modis and viirs. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/ feature-articles/firms-adds-ultra-real-time-data-from-modis-viirs, 2025. OrbitTransit: Traffic Delivery and Diffusion for Earth Observation via Satellite Mobility Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Jpss high rate data

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Jpss high rate data. https://www .ospo.noaa.gov/operations/jpss/high-rate- data.html, 2025

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Mixed integer linear programming formulation techniques.SIAM Review, 2015

    Juan Pablo Vielma. Mixed integer linear programming formulation techniques.SIAM Review, 2015. A Appendix A.1 Wildfire Monitoring Example Adapting to task urgency.OrbitTransit can be directly integrated into existing EO mission workflows, with wildfire monitoring as one representative example. EO satellites pe- riodically scan fire-prone regions and report...

    work page 2015