pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04625 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Compact Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface with Phase-Gradient Coded Beam Steering and Controlled Substrate Loss

Mahendra Kheti , Debapratim Ghosh , Soumya P. Dash This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords reconfigurable intelligent surfacebeam steeringphase gradient codingPIN diodeFR4 substrateair gap5G n78 bandwireless channel
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact 10-by-10 RIS built on FR4 with an air gap and PIN-diode cells delivers 9 dB reflected gain while steering beams up to 30 degrees at 3.5 GHz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how a low-cost three-layer RIS can be made by inserting a controlled air gap into a standard FR4 stack to cut dielectric losses. Each unit cell uses a PIN diode with a simplified biasing circuit to switch between two clear reflection phases. A phase-gradient coding pattern then steers the reflected beam, and bench measurements confirm the surface adds roughly 9 dB to the reflected signal strength over a 60-degree angular window. The same hardware also passes QPSK-modulated symbols through the assisted wireless link, all while fitting inside a 2.9-wavelength square footprint and working across the 3.38–3.67 GHz band.

Core claim

The authors fabricate and test a 1-bit RIS whose unit cells are realized on a three-layer manual stackup that includes an optimized air gap on FR4. Each cell contains a PIN diode driven through a compact biasing network that keeps the ON and OFF reflection phases distinct at 0° and 180° within ±20°. When the 10-by-10 array is programmed with a phase-gradient code, the measured reflected power increases by about 9 dB for incident angles out to ±30° in both anechoic and noisy rooms; the same surface also relays QPSK symbols successfully.

What carries the argument

The phase-gradient coding scheme applied across the 1-bit PIN-diode unit cells, combined with the air-gap layer that reduces effective substrate loss.

If this is right

  • Beam steering up to ±30° is achieved with a single low-cost board and simple digital control.
  • The surface improves reflected signal strength by 9 dB over the full steering range in both quiet and noisy settings.
  • QPSK-modulated data can be relayed through the RIS-assisted channel without additional hardware.
  • The design occupies only 2.9 by 2.9 wavelengths and operates inside the 3.5 GHz 5G n78 band.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same air-gap technique could be reused at nearby frequencies by resizing the patch and gap spacing.
  • Because the control is handled by an Arduino-style interface, the surface can be reprogrammed on the fly for changing traffic directions.
  • Lower material cost may allow RIS panels to be installed on many more surfaces than current high-end versions permit.

Load-bearing premise

The fabricated cells keep their two reflection phases reliably separated by 180° and the air gap reduces losses without adding extra reflections or manufacturing variations that would degrade the array performance.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the reflection coefficient of single unit cells showing phase error larger than ±20° between states, or a full-array test in which the reflected gain stays below 6 dB across the ±30° range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04625 by Debapratim Ghosh, Mahendra Kheti, Soumya P. Dash.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cross-sectional view of the proposed RIS unit cell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Equivalent circuit model of the proposed biasing lay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Radiating layer (b) ground layer and (c) bias [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated reflection coefficient of the RIS unit cell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulated reflection coefficient phase response of th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Proposed RIS reflective surface showing different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Equivalent block diagram of the RIS setup in Fig. 7. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Photographs showing the RIS radiation layer array (t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of simulated and measured normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Coding patterns applied to the RIS for steering angl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Normalized radiation patterns of the proposed RIS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Normalized radiation patterns of the proposed RIS fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Block diagram of the USRP-based QPSK transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Constellation of received QPSK signal measured wit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a 1-bit reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) fabricated using a three-layer structure. It employs a manual layer stackup incorporating an optimal air gap to reduce the effective dielectric losses while using a low-cost FR4 substrate. The new design of the unit cells of the proposed RIS is outlined, with each unit cell featuring a PIN-diode-based, compact, simplified biasing network that simplifies the control circuit while maintaining distinct $\boldsymbol{0^\circ/180^\circ \pm 20^\circ}$ phase states between ON/OFF conditions. The designed RIS is in the form of a $\boldsymbol{10\times10}$ array with a compact size of $\boldsymbol{2.9\lambda_g \times 2.9\lambda_g}$. Additionally, a phase-gradient coding scheme is presented and utilized that achieves measured beam steering up to $\boldsymbol{\pm30^\circ}$ in both anechoic and noisy environments. Controlled and driven by an Arduino-cum-digital interface, the proposed RIS exhibits measured reflected wave gain enhancement of about 9\,dB over an incident wave angular range of $\boldsymbol{\pm 30^\circ}$. Furthermore, the design is also experimentally validated by transmitting quadrature phase-shift keying-modulated symbols via the RIS-assisted wireless channel. The proposed RIS works for the range 3.38--3.67\,GHz (8.3\%), and is suitable for deployment for the 5G n78 \mbox{band (3.5\,GHz).}

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and experimentally demonstrates a compact 1-bit RIS using a three-layer FR4 structure with an air gap for reduced dielectric loss. The 10x10 array employs PIN-diode unit cells designed for 0°/180° ±20° phase difference and a phase-gradient coding scheme for beam steering. Measurements show beam steering to ±30° and 9 dB gain enhancement in the 3.38-3.67 GHz range, with QPSK transmission validation.

Significance. This work contributes a practical, low-cost RIS design for 5G applications by addressing substrate losses and biasing complexity. The experimental results in both anechoic and noisy settings, if fully substantiated, support its potential for real-world deployment. The phase-gradient approach and modulated signal test are notable strengths.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.2 Unit Cell Characterization: The claim of maintaining distinct 0°/180° ±20° phase states is not supported by any presented measured reflection phase or magnitude data from the fabricated unit cells after incorporating the air gap; only design simulations may be shown, but this is load-bearing for attributing the 9 dB gain to the coding scheme.
  2. §5 Experimental Setup and Results: The 9 dB reflected wave gain enhancement over ±30° is reported without error bars, detailed measurement procedure, or baseline comparison (e.g., to a passive reflector or uniform phase state), leaving open whether fabrication variances or unaccounted reflections contribute to the result.
  3. §4 Fabrication Details: No tolerance analysis is provided for the manual air-gap stackup height or diode biasing network variations, which could shift phase states or introduce losses, undermining the controlled substrate loss claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The percentage bandwidth (8.3%) should specify the criterion used (e.g., reflection coefficient threshold or phase stability range).
  2. Figure captions: Ensure all figures include scale bars or clear axis labels for the beam patterns and gain measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will incorporate revisions to improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.2 Unit Cell Characterization: The claim of maintaining distinct 0°/180° ±20° phase states is not supported by any presented measured reflection phase or magnitude data from the fabricated unit cells after incorporating the air gap; only design simulations may be shown, but this is load-bearing for attributing the 9 dB gain to the coding scheme.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern. The unit cell design simulations in §3.2 include the air gap and demonstrate the required phase difference. Although measured data for individual unit cells were obtained during fabrication validation, they were omitted from the manuscript to focus on system-level results. The array-level beam steering and gain measurements indirectly confirm the phase states. To fully address this, we will include the measured reflection phase and magnitude plots for the fabricated unit cells in the revised §3.2, along with a brief discussion of the measurement setup for the unit cell. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 Experimental Setup and Results: The 9 dB reflected wave gain enhancement over ±30° is reported without error bars, detailed measurement procedure, or baseline comparison (e.g., to a passive reflector or uniform phase state), leaving open whether fabrication variances or unaccounted reflections contribute to the result.

    Authors: We agree that additional details would strengthen the presentation. The 9 dB enhancement is the difference between the RIS in phase-gradient mode and the case without RIS (or uniform state). In the revision, we will: add a detailed description of the measurement procedure in the anechoic chamber; include error bars from repeated measurements; and provide baseline comparisons to a passive reflector and uniform phase configurations. This will demonstrate that the gain is attributable to the coding scheme rather than artifacts. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §4 Fabrication Details: No tolerance analysis is provided for the manual air-gap stackup height or diode biasing network variations, which could shift phase states or introduce losses, undermining the controlled substrate loss claim.

    Authors: We recognize the value of tolerance analysis for the manual assembly. The air gap is set using precision spacers, and the biasing lines are designed with minimal impact. We will add to §4 a tolerance analysis based on simulations showing the effect of ±0.2 mm air gap variation and typical diode/biasing variations on the phase states and losses. This analysis will confirm that the phase difference remains within the specified ±20° and that substrate losses are effectively controlled. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; all central claims are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper's core results—the 9 dB reflected-wave gain enhancement, beam steering to ±30°, and QPSK symbol transmission—are obtained from fabricated 10×10 array measurements in anechoic and noisy environments. The design description (unit-cell PIN-diode biasing, manual air-gap stackup on FR4, phase-gradient coding) is presented as a construction recipe whose performance is then validated by far-field measurements rather than derived or predicted from fitted equations. No self-referential definitions, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the work is self-contained through empirical data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The contribution is an applied hardware design and experimental validation with no mathematical derivations, physical models, or theoretical claims; therefore no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1188 out tokens · 55686 ms · 2026-05-10T19:30:27.621587+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    RIS-assisted 6G wireless comm unications: A novel statistical framework in the presence of direct chan nel,

    S. P . Dash and A. Kaushik, “RIS-assisted 6G wireless comm unications: A novel statistical framework in the presence of direct chan nel,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 717–721, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    A survey on reconfigurable intellig ent surface- assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,

    Q. Tao, Z. Li, K. Zhi, S. Li, W. Y uan, L. Zaniboni, S. Stancz ak, E. Viterbo, and X. Wang, “A survey on reconfigurable intellig ent surface- assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,” IEEE Open J. V eh. Technol., vol. 6, pp. 1881–1909, May 2025

    work page 1909

  3. [3]

    A 2-bit r econfig- urable metasurface with real-time control for deflection, d iffusion, and polarization,

    W. Li, H. Guo, X. Wang, G.-M. Y ang, and Y .-Q. Jin, “A 2-bit r econfig- urable metasurface with real-time control for deflection, d iffusion, and polarization,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 1521– 1531, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    A novel channel model for reconfigurable intelligent surfa ces with consideration of polarization and switch impairments,

    D.-M. Chian, C.-K. Wen, C.-H. Wu, F.-K. Wang, and K.-K. Wo ng, “A novel channel model for reconfigurable intelligent surfa ces with consideration of polarization and switch impairments,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3680–3695, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: analysis and design , 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, Jan. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    R. E. Collin, Antennas and Radiowave Propagation . New Y ork, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1985

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    A shared-aperture dual-band sub-6 ghz and mmw ave reconfigurable intelligent surface with independent opera tion,

    J. Rao, Y . Zhang, S. Tang, Z. Li, Z. Ming, J. Zhang, C. Y . Chi u, and R. Murch, “A shared-aperture dual-band sub-6 ghz and mmw ave reconfigurable intelligent surface with independent opera tion,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 4116–4132, Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    A simplified , double- layer and low-profile 1-bit reconfigurable reflectarray for 2 -d space-time beam steering,

    G. Li, J. Han, X. Ma, X. Wang, H. Liu, and L. Li, “A simplified , double- layer and low-profile 1-bit reconfigurable reflectarray for 2 -d space-time beam steering,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 658–662, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    A wideband low-cost Re- configurable Reflectarray Antenna with 1-bit resolution,

    B. J. Xiang, X. Dai, and K. M. Luk, “A wideband low-cost Re- configurable Reflectarray Antenna with 1-bit resolution,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 7439–7447, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    A wideband rec onfig- urable intelligent surface for 5G millimeter-wave applica tions,

    R. Wang, Y . Y ang, B. Makki, and A. Shamim, “A wideband rec onfig- urable intelligent surface for 5G millimeter-wave applica tions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2399–2410, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    A 1-b it time-modulated reflectarray for reconfigurable-intellige nt-surface appli- cations,

    X. Cao, Q. Chen, T. Tanaka, M. Kozai, and H. Minami, “A 1-b it time-modulated reflectarray for reconfigurable-intellige nt-surface appli- cations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 2396–2408, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    A low-cost structure for reducing reflection loss in intellig ent reflecting surface of liquid crystal,

    Y . Cui, H. Sato, Y . Shibata, T. Ishinabe, H. Fujikake, an d Q. Chen, “A low-cost structure for reducing reflection loss in intellig ent reflecting surface of liquid crystal,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3027–3031, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Dual- polarization 1-bit/quasi-2-bit low-cost programmable me tasurface with merged control circuit,

    P . Li, J. Ren, Y . Chen, X. Ren, K. D. Xu, Y . Z. Yin, and M. She n, “Dual- polarization 1-bit/quasi-2-bit low-cost programmable me tasurface with merged control circuit,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3348–3361, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Macromodeling o f recon- figurable intelligent surface based on microwave network th eory,

    L. Zhou, J. Huang, H. Huang, and Y . Sun, “Macromodeling o f recon- figurable intelligent surface based on microwave network th eory,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 4970– 4982, July 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Design of anom alous reflectors by phase gradient unit cell based digitally coded metasurface,

    R. Malleboina, J. C. Dash, and D. Sarkar, “Design of anom alous reflectors by phase gradient unit cell based digitally coded metasurface,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2305–2309, Sep. 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Theory and expe riments for circular microstrip antennas,

    Y . T. Lo, D. Solomon, and W. F. Richards, “Theory and expe riments for circular microstrip antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 137–145, Mar. 1979

    work page 1979

  17. [17]

    Improved an alysis for circular microstrip antennas,

    W. F. Richards, Y . T. Lo, and D. D. Harrison, “Improved an alysis for circular microstrip antennas,” Electron. Lett., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 42–44, Jan. 1979

    work page 1979

  18. [18]

    Characteristics of annular- ring and circular- disc microstrip antennas with and without airgaps,

    K. F. Lee and J. S. Dahele, “Characteristics of annular- ring and circular- disc microstrip antennas with and without airgaps,” in IEEE Antennas Propagat. Soc. Int. Sym. Digest , vol. 21, May 1983, pp. 55–58

    work page 1983

  19. [19]

    Tunable dual-frequency stac ked antenna,

    J. S. Dahele and K. F. Lee, “Tunable dual-frequency stac ked antenna,” in IEEE Antennas Propagat. Soc. Int. Sym. Digest , vol. 20, May 1982, pp. 308–311

    work page 1982

  20. [20]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave engineering , 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, Nov. 2012, ch. 1–2, pp. 26–85

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    2018, datasheet

    Skyworks Solutions, Inc., SMP1345 series: very low capacitance plastic packaged silicon PIN diodes , Jun. 2018, datasheet

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Equivalent circuit models for m etasurfaces using floquet modal expansion of surface current distributi ons,

    E. Baladi and S. V . Hum, “Equivalent circuit models for m etasurfaces using floquet modal expansion of surface current distributi ons,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5691–5703, Sep. 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Computational ap proach of designing magnet-free nonreciprocal metamaterial,

    S. Poddar, M. T. Hasan, and R. Shakil, “Computational ap proach of designing magnet-free nonreciprocal metamaterial,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. C , vol. 121, pp. 197–206, May 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Simple and accurate analy tical model of planar grids and high-impedance surfaces comprising met al strips or patches over grounded dielectric slabs,

    O. Luukkonen, C. Simovski, G. Granet, G. Goussetis, D. L ioubtchenko, A. R¨ ais¨ anen, and S. Tretyakov, “Simple and accurate analy tical model of planar grids and high-impedance surfaces comprising met al strips or patches over grounded dielectric slabs,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1624–1632, Jun. 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Available: https://www.arduino.cc

    Arduino, Arduino Mega 2560 Rev3 , 2023, datasheet. Available: https://www.arduino.cc

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    2015, datasheet

    Texas Instruments, TPIC6B595N power logic 8-bit shift register datasheet, Mar. 2015, datasheet

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    A dual-polarized r econfigurable reflectarray antennabased on dual-channel programmable me tasurface,

    Y . Zhang, X. Li, H. Y ang, and S. Gong, “A dual-polarized r econfigurable reflectarray antennabased on dual-channel programmable me tasurface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 7403–7413, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    De- sign of low-cost single-layer 2-bit reflective programmabl e metasurface based on folded ground,

    P . Li, J. Ren, Y . Chen, X. Ren, K.-D. Xu, Y .-Z. Yin, and M. S hen, “De- sign of low-cost single-layer 2-bit reflective programmabl e metasurface based on folded ground,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. , vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3455–3465, Aug. 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    21, 2026

    National Instruments, NI USRP-2901 software defined radio device , National Instruments, 2016, accessed: Mar. 21, 2026. [Onli ne]. Available: https://www.ni.com/pdf/manuals/374760n.html

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Performance ana lysis of an index modulation-based receive diversity RIS-assist ed wireless communication system,

    S. P . Dash, R. K. Mallik, and N. Pandey, “Performance ana lysis of an index modulation-based receive diversity RIS-assist ed wireless communication system,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 768– 772, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    J. G. Proakis and M. Salehi, Digital Communications , 5th ed. New Y ork, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, Aug. 2008, ch. 5

    work page 2008