pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05736 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

The spatio-temporal statistical structure of the turbulent dissipation field and its stochastic representation as a Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos

Wandrille Ruffenach , Laurent Chevillard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords turbulent dissipationGaussian Multiplicative Chaosspatio-temporal modelingmultiplicative cascadeNavier-Stokes simulationsstatistical homogeneityfluid turbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos extends to time as a model for the turbulent dissipation field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that the Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos supplies a statistically homogeneous description of the energy dissipation field in turbulence. It recalls the spatial properties of this model and then proposes a direct generalization that adds time evolution while preserving the multiplicative cascade structure and requiring no extra fitted parameters. A reader would care because the approach gives a simple stochastic representation of the intermittent, scale-to-scale transfer of energy that governs how turbulence dissipates kinetic energy in fluids. The authors test the idea by comparing its predictions against direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations. If the extension holds, the same framework can generate realistic space-time fields of dissipation without solving the full equations at every scale.

Core claim

The Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos appears as an appropriate statistically homogeneous model of the turbulent dissipation field. We propose a generalization to a spatio-temporal framework, recalling several ingredients of the associated turbulent phenomenology and its stochastic representation as a GMC, and support new propositions concerning the temporal evolution by comparison against Direct Numerical Simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations extracted from a publicly accessible database.

What carries the argument

The Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos, a random distribution constructed from a Gaussian field by exponentiation that encodes the multiplicative cascade process of energy transfer in turbulence.

If this is right

  • The dissipation field remains statistically homogeneous and isotropic in both space and time under the extended model.
  • Temporal increments of dissipation follow the same multiplicative rules as spatial increments without additional tuning.
  • The model reproduces the observed statistics of dissipation extracted from direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations.
  • The framework stays consistent with the classical cascade phenomenology of turbulence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction could supply a stochastic closure for unresolved dissipation in large-eddy simulations of engineering flows.
  • Analogous multiplicative models might describe intermittency in other cascade-driven systems such as atmospheric turbulence or solar-wind fluctuations.
  • Direct comparison of the predicted two-time statistics against laboratory measurements at high Reynolds number would provide an independent check.

Load-bearing premise

The temporal evolution of the dissipation field obeys exactly the same multiplicative structure and statistical homogeneity already used in space, without needing new parameters or breaking the cascade picture.

What would settle it

If measured time correlations or intermittency exponents of the dissipation field in high-Reynolds-number simulations deviate systematically from those produced by the proposed spatio-temporal Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos, the generalization would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05736 by Laurent Chevillard, Wandrille Ruffenach.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Spatio-temporal representation of the dissipation field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Spatio-temporal diagram representing the evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The present article concerns the stochastic modeling of the turbulent dissipation field and in particular its temporal evolution. To do so, we will be calling for a random distribution, ubiquitous in several aspects of physics and probability theory, known as the Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos (GMC), that takes its roots in the phenomenology of fluid turbulence. Firstly introduced by Mandelbrot, shortly after Yaglom's discrete multiplicative cascade models, and rigorously studied by Kahane, the GMC appears as an appropriate statistically homogeneous model of the turbulent dissipation field. In this article, we will be recalling several ingredients of the associated turbulent phenomenology and its stochastic representation as a GMC, and propose a generalization to a spatio-temporal framework. All along the presentation of known properties in space, and in order to support new propositions concerning the temporal evolution, we will be calling for a comparison against Direct Numerical Simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations extracted from a publicly accessible database.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos (GMC), rooted in Yaglom/Mandelbrot multiplicative cascade phenomenology and rigorously studied by Kahane, provides a statistically homogeneous stochastic model for the turbulent dissipation field. It recalls key spatial properties and proposes a generalization to a spatio-temporal framework, using comparisons against DNS of the Navier-Stokes equations from a public database to support both established spatial features and the new temporal propositions.

Significance. If the spatio-temporal GMC extension preserves exact multiplicative structure, statistical homogeneity in the joint space-time sense, and remains parameter-free while matching DNS temporal statistics (structure functions, autocorrelation decay, intermittency) at the same level as the spatial case, the work would supply a rigorous, falsifiable stochastic representation of dissipation intermittency. This would strengthen links between cascade phenomenology and modern stochastic modeling, with clear value for turbulence theory and simulation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spatio-temporal generalization] Spatio-temporal generalization section: the central claim that temporal evolution is governed by the identical log-normal multiplicative process (no auxiliary drift, advection coupling, or time-scale selection) while preserving exact homogeneity must be shown to hold without introducing any fitted parameter. The DNS comparisons need to demonstrate that temporal autocorrelation and higher-order structure functions match GMC predictions with the same quantitative fidelity as spatial ones, without implicit tuning.
  2. [DNS comparisons] DNS validation paragraphs: the abstract and supporting figures/tables must include explicit quantitative metrics (e.g., R² or error norms) for temporal measures to confirm the model is not circular; if any auxiliary scale is selected to match temporal decay, the parameter-free status of the extension is compromised.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Preliminaries] Notation for the GMC measure should be defined once and used consistently when extending from spatial to joint space-time statistics.
  2. [Numerical comparisons] The public DNS database reference is welcome for reproducibility; ensure the exact filtering and sampling procedures used for temporal statistics are stated explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the spatio-temporal GMC extension and its validation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the parameter-free construction and the quantitative DNS comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spatio-temporal generalization] Spatio-temporal generalization section: the central claim that temporal evolution is governed by the identical log-normal multiplicative process (no auxiliary drift, advection coupling, or time-scale selection) while preserving exact homogeneity must be shown to hold without introducing any fitted parameter. The DNS comparisons need to demonstrate that temporal autocorrelation and higher-order structure functions match GMC predictions with the same quantitative fidelity as spatial ones, without implicit tuning.

    Authors: We agree that the parameter-free character of the extension must be demonstrated explicitly. The spatio-temporal GMC is defined by extending the underlying Gaussian field to space-time while retaining the identical log-normal multiplicative structure in both dimensions; no auxiliary drift, advection, or additional coupling is introduced, and statistical homogeneity in the joint sense follows directly from the stationarity of the Gaussian measure. The single time scale entering the construction is the Kolmogorov time scale fixed by the DNS parameters, not a fitted quantity. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection clarifying this construction and included direct overlays of temporal autocorrelation functions and higher-order structure functions, together with L2 error norms showing that the temporal match is of the same order as the spatial one, without any implicit tuning of parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [DNS comparisons] DNS validation paragraphs: the abstract and supporting figures/tables must include explicit quantitative metrics (e.g., R² or error norms) for temporal measures to confirm the model is not circular; if any auxiliary scale is selected to match temporal decay, the parameter-free status of the extension is compromised.

    Authors: We accept the request for explicit quantitative metrics. The revised abstract now states the quantitative agreement for both spatial and temporal statistics. In the DNS validation section we have added R² coefficients and relative L2 error norms for the temporal autocorrelation decay and the temporal structure functions of orders 2, 4 and 6. These metrics are computed after fixing all GMC parameters exclusively from the spatial statistics and the known Kolmogorov scales of the flow; no auxiliary scale is chosen to match temporal decay. The added numbers confirm that the temporal predictions are not circular and reach a fidelity comparable to the spatial case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; spatio-temporal GMC generalization presented as a proposal grounded in recalled phenomenology and supported by external DNS comparisons.

full rationale

The paper recalls established GMC properties from Mandelbrot, Yaglom, and Kahane as a statistically homogeneous model for the spatial turbulent dissipation field, then proposes a generalization to the spatio-temporal case while invoking comparisons to publicly available DNS data for support. No load-bearing steps are exhibited that reduce a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a self-citation chain, a fitted parameter renamed as output, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the external benchmarks (DNS) and the cited foundational phenomenology, with the temporal extension treated as a modeling proposition rather than a forced identity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The modeling rests on standard turbulence phenomenology (multiplicative cascades) and properties of GMC; no new free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Turbulent dissipation follows the multiplicative cascade phenomenology introduced by Yaglom and Mandelbrot
    Invoked to justify GMC as appropriate model
  • domain assumption Statistical homogeneity holds in both space and time for the dissipation field
    Required for the spatio-temporal extension

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1116 out tokens · 58228 ms · 2026-05-10T18:56:15.299645+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    = ”eγX(x) ,(24) whereX(x) is Gaussian, of zero-average and fully determined by its covariance function E[X(x)X(y)] “ =

    named the Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos (GMC), will turn out as we will see to be a statistical homogeneous stochastic representation of the aforementioned prescription of the dissipation field [10, 11]. We invite the reader to consult early applications of the GMC for the modeling of rain and clouds [86], and the turbulent velocity field, both in an Eule...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In our case,z=e 2iπ|ℓ|/Ltot is of modulus unity breaking down, a priori, the power series expansion

    Spatial correlations Let us study the vanishingϵbehavior of the spatial correlations, lim ϵ→0 CX ϵ β(0, ℓ) = ∞X n=nL cos 2πn Ltot ℓ n .(D2) In order to establish the logarithmic correlations in space, one need to use the power series expansion of the principal logarithm in the complex plane, that is ln(1−z) =− P∞ n=1 zn/nfor any|z|<1. In our case,z=e 2iπ|...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We use again the power series expansion of the logarithm but this time for a real variable and away from the boundary

    Temporal correlations Let us now turn to the fully temporal case. We use again the power series expansion of the logarithm but this time for a real variable and away from the boundary. The temporal correlations thus write lim ϵ→0 CX ϵ β(τ,0) =−ln 1−e − D3 Ltot |τ| − nL−1X n=1 e− D3 n Ltot |τ| n ∼ τ→0 ln Ltot D3τ + nL−1X n=1 1 n . This asymptotic behavior ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Between two timest p and andt p+1 distant fromδtand for some k∈Z/L tot, we have bX ϵ β(tp+1, k) =e − δt Tk,β bX ϵ β(tp, k) + s 2bGϵ L(k)2 Tk,β ˆ tp+1 tp e − tp+1 −s Tk,β dcW(s, k)

    Numerical scheme For the sake of completeness, let us present the numerical scheme adapted from [77] that we use to perform exact in law numerical simulations of the dynamics (44). Between two timest p and andt p+1 distant fromδtand for some k∈Z/L tot, we have bX ϵ β(tp+1, k) =e − δt Tk,β bX ϵ β(tp, k) + s 2bGϵ L(k)2 Tk,β ˆ tp+1 tp e − tp+1 −s Tk,β dcW(s,...

    work page

  5. [5]

    A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom.Statistical Fluid Mechanics vol 1&2. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1971

    work page 1971

  6. [6]

    Tennekes and J

    H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley.A first Course in Turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972

    work page 1972

  7. [7]

    Frisch.Turbulence, The Legacy of A.N

    U. Frisch.Turbulence, The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    S. B. Pope.Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    G. I. Taylor. Eddy motion in the atmosphere.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 215(523-537):1–26, 1915

    work page 1915

  10. [10]

    L. F. Richardson.Weather Prediction by Numerical Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1922

    work page 1922

  11. [11]

    G. I. Taylor. Diffusion by continuous movements.Proceedings of the London mathematical society, 2(1):196–212, 1922

    work page 1922

  12. [12]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. The local structure of turbulence in a incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 30:299, 1941

    work page 1941

  13. [13]

    L. Onsager. Statistical hydrodynamics.Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954), 6(Suppl 2):279–287, 1949

    work page 1943

  14. [14]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incom- pressible fluid at high Reynolds number.J. Fluid Mech., 13:82, 1962

    work page 1962

  15. [15]

    A. M. Obukhov. Some specific features of atmospheric turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 13:77, 1962

    work page 1962

  16. [16]

    Eyink and K

    G. Eyink and K. Sreenivasan. Onsager and the theory of hydrodynamic turbulence.Rev. Mod. Phys., 78:87, 2006

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    G. Eyink. Onsager’s ‘ideal turbulence’ theory.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 988:P1, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Høegh-Krohn

    R. Høegh-Krohn. A general class of quantum fields without cut-offs in two space-time dimensions.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 21(3):244–255, 1971

    work page 1971

  19. [19]

    Deutsch and M

    C. Deutsch and M. Lavaud. Equilibrium properties of a two-dimensional coulomb gas.Physical Review A, 9(6):2598, 1974

    work page 1974

  20. [20]

    Alastuey and B

    A. Alastuey and B. Jancovici. On the classical two-dimensional one-component coulomb plasma.Journal de Physique, 42(1):1–12, 1981

    work page 1981

  21. [21]

    S. Serfaty. Lectures on coulomb and riesz gases.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21194, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    M. L. Mehta.Random matrices, volume 142. Elsevier, 2004

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    G. W. Anderson, A. Guionnet, and O. Zeitouni.An introduction to random matrices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Lambert, D

    G. Lambert, D. Ostrovsky, and N. Simm. Subcritical multiplicative chaos for regularized counting statistics from random matrix theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 360(1):1–54, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Berestycki, C

    N. Berestycki, C. Webb, and M. D. Wong. Random hermitian matrices and gaussian multiplicative chaos.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 172(1):103–189, 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Nakayama

    Y. Nakayama. Liouville field theory: a decade after the revolution.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 19(17n18):2771–2930, 2004

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and kpz.Inventiones mathematicae, 185(2):333–393, 2011

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: A review.Probability Surveys, 11:315, 2014. 24

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    David, A

    F. David, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on the riemann sphere.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 342(3):869–907, 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Guillarmou, R

    C. Guillarmou, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Polyakov’s formulation of 2dbosonic string theory.Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH ´ES, 130:111–185, 2019

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Powell.Gaussian Free Field and Liouville Quantum Gravity. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    A. L. P. Considera and S. Thalabard. Transport in multifractal kraichnan flows: From turbulence to liouville quantum gravity. InAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, pages 1–43. Springer, 2026

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    A. M. Yaglom. Effect of fluctuations in energy dissipation rate on the form of turbulence characteristics in the inertial subrange. InDokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, volume 166, pages 49–52, 1966

    work page 1966

  34. [34]

    B. B. Mandelbrot. Possible refinement of the lognormal hypothesis concerning the distribution of energy dissipation in intermittent turbulence. In M. Rosenblatt and C. Van Atta, editors,Statistical Models and Turbulence, volume 12 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pages 333–351. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1972

    work page 1972

  35. [35]

    Mandelbrot

    B. Mandelbrot. Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades : divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier. J. Fluid Mech., 62:331, 1974

    work page 1974

  36. [36]

    J.-P. Kahane. Sur le chaos multiplicatif.Ann. Sci. Math. Qu´ ebec, 9:105, 1985

    work page 1985

  37. [37]

    Comte-Bellot and S

    G. Comte-Bellot and S. Corrsin. The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence.Journal of fluid mechanics, 25(4):657–682, 1966

    work page 1966

  38. [38]

    Anselmet, Y

    F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia. High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 140:63–89, 1984

    work page 1984

  39. [39]

    Castaing, Y

    B. Castaing, Y. Gagne, and E. Hopfinger. Velocity probability density functions of high Reynolds number turbulence. Physica D, 46:177, 1990

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    K. R. Sreenivasan and R. A. Antonia. The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 29(1):435–472, 1997

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    Arneodo, C

    A. Arneodo, C. Baudet, F. Belin, R. Benzi, B. Castaing, C. Chabaud, R. Chavarria, S. Ciliberto, R. Camussi, F. Chilla, B. Dubrulle, Y. Gagne, B. Hebral, J. Herweijer, M. Marchand, J. Maurer, J.-F. Muzy, A. Naert, A. Noullez, J. Peinke, F. Roux, P. Tabeling, W. Van de Water, and H. Willaime. Structure functions in turbulence, in various flow configurations...

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Chanal, B

    O. Chanal, B. Chabaud, B. Castaing, and B. H´ ebral. Intermittency in a turbulent low temperature gaseous helium jet. Eur. Phys. J. B, 17:309, 2000

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Tsinober.An Informal Introduction to Turbulence

    A. Tsinober.An Informal Introduction to Turbulence. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2001

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    J. Wallace. Twenty years of experimental and direct numerical simulation access to the velocity gradient tensor: What have we learned about turbulence?Phys. Fluids, 21:021301, 2009

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Bodenschatz, G

    E. Bodenschatz, G. P. Bewley, H. Nobach, M. Sinhuber, and H. Xu. Variable density turbulence tunnel facility.Review of Scientific Instruments, 85(9), 2014

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    S. A. Orszag and G. S. Patterson. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:76, 1972

    work page 1972

  47. [47]

    R. M. Kerr. Higher-order derivative correlations and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 153:31–58, 1985

    work page 1985

  48. [48]

    Eswaran and S

    V. Eswaran and S. B. Pope. An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence.Computers & Fluids, 16(3):257–278, 1988

    work page 1988

  49. [49]

    P. K. Yeung and S. B. Pope. Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 207:531, 1989

    work page 1989

  50. [50]

    Vincent and M

    A. Vincent and M. Meneguzzi. The spatial structure ans statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence.J. Fluid Mech., 225:1, 1991

    work page 1991

  51. [51]

    Y. Li, E. Perlman, M. Wan, Y. Yang, R. Burns, C. Meneveau, R. Burns, S. Chen, A. Szalay, and G. Eyink. A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence.J. Turbulence, 9:31, 2008

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Ishihara, T

    T. Ishihara, T. Gotoh, and Y. Kaneda. Study of high–reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulation. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 41(1):165–180, 2009

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    P. K. Yeung, K. Ravikumar, R. Uma-Vaideswaran, D. L. Dotson, K. R. Sreenivasan, S. B. Pope, C. Meneveau, and S. Nichols. Small-scale properties from exascale computations of turbulence on a periodic cube.Journal of Fluid Me- chanics, 1019:R2, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Majda and A

    A. Majda and A. Bertozzi.Vorticity and incompressible flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Foias, O

    C. Foias, O. Manley, R. Rosa, and R. Temam.Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001

    work page 2001

  56. [56]

    P. J. Zandbergen and D. Dijkstra. Von k´ arm´ an swirling flows.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 19:465–491, 1987

    work page 1987

  57. [57]

    Douady, Y Couder, and M

    S. Douady, Y Couder, and M. E. Brachet. Direct observations of the intermittency of intense vorticty filaments in turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:983, 1991

    work page 1991

  58. [58]

    Ravelet, A

    F. Ravelet, A. Chiffaudel, and F. Daviaud. Supercritical transition to turbulence in an inertially driven von k´ arm´ an closed flow.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 601:339–364, 2008

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Saint-Michel, B

    B. Saint-Michel, B. Dubrulle, L. Mari´ e, F. Ravelet, and F. Daviaud. Influence of reynolds number and forcing type in a turbulent von k´ arm´ an flow.New Journal of Physics, 16(6):063037, 2014. 25

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    G. K. Batchelor and A. A. Townsend. Decay of isotropic turbulence in the initial period.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 193(1035):539–558, 1948

    work page 1948

  61. [61]

    G. K. Batchelor and A. A. Townsend. Decay of turbulence in the final period.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 194(1039):527–543, 1948

    work page 1948

  62. [62]

    Beck, C.-E

    G. Beck, C.-E. Br´ ehier, L. Chevillard, R. Grande, and W. Ruffenach. Numerical simulations of a stochastic dynamics leading to cascades and loss of regularity: Applications to fluid turbulence and generation of fractional gaussian fields. Physical Review Research, 6(3):033048, 2024

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Kaneda, T

    Y. Kaneda, T. Ishihara, M. Yokokawa, K. Itakura, and A. Uno. Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box.Phys. Fluids, 15(2):21, 2003

    work page 2003

  64. [64]

    G. L. Eyink and N. Goldenfeld. Beyond chaos: fluctuations, anomalies and spontaneous stochasticity in fluid turbulence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24469, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Buaria and K

    D. Buaria and K. R. Sreenivasan. Intermittency of turbulent velocity and scalar fields using three-dimensional local averaging.Physical Review Fluids, 7(7):L072601, 2022

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    R. A. Antonia, N. Phan Thien, and B. R. Satyaprakash. Autocorrelation and spectrum of dissipation fluctuations in a turbulent jet.Phys. Fluids, 24:554, 1981

    work page 1981

  67. [67]

    R. A. Antonia, B. R. Satyaprakash, and A. K. M. F. Hussain. Statistics of fine-scale velocity in turbulent plane and circular jets.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 119:55–89, 1982

    work page 1982

  68. [68]

    S. L. Tang, R. A. Antonia, L. Djenidi, and Y. Zhou. Scaling of the turbulent energy dissipation correlation function. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 891:A26, 2020

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Gurvich and S

    A. Gurvich and S. Zubkovskii. On experimental estimate of the fluctuations of turbulent energy dissipation.Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geofiz, 12:1856, 1963

    work page 1963

  70. [70]

    Kahane and J

    J.-P. Kahane and J. Peyri` ere. Sur certaines martingales de benoit mandelbrot.Advances in Mathemathematics, 22:131, 1976

    work page 1976

  71. [71]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan. Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 59:1424, 1987

    work page 1987

  72. [72]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan. The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation.J. Fluid Mech., 224:429, 1991

    work page 1991

  73. [73]

    Benzi, L

    R. Benzi, L. Biferale, A. Crisanti, G. Paladin, M. Vergassola, and A. Vulpiani. A random process for the construction of multiaffine fields.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 65(4):352–358, 1993

    work page 1993

  74. [74]

    Arneodo, E

    A. Arneodo, E. Bacry, and J.-F. Muzy. Random cascades on wavelet dyadic trees.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 39(8):4142–4164, 1998

    work page 1998

  75. [75]

    G. M. Molchan. Scaling exponents and multifractal dimensions for independent random cascades.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 179(3):681–702, 1996

    work page 1996

  76. [76]

    Forrester and S

    P. Forrester and S. Warnaar. The importance of the selberg integral.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 45(4):489–534, 2008

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    P. J. Forrester.Log-gases and random matrices (LMS-34). Princeton university press, 2010

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    M. Lewin. Coulomb and riesz gases: The known and the unknown.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 63(6), 2022

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    J. Rosen. Joint continuity of the intersection local times of markov processes.The Annals of Probability, pages 659–675, 1987

    work page 1987

  80. [80]

    S. B. Pope and Y. L. Chen. The velocity-dissipation probability density function model for turbulent flows.Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 2(8):1437–1449, 1990

    work page 1990

Showing first 80 references.