pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05847 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Development and Performance of an Instrumentation Laboratory for Infrared Medical Imaging

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph
keywords infrared medical imagingthermal tomographyhigh-precision measurementswax phantomstemperature resolutioninstrumentation laboratorydata correction protocols
0
0 comments X

The pith

An infrared imaging laboratory setup detects surface temperature variations below 0.1 K after applying corrections to reduce uncertainty to 25 mK.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the development of an experimental setup for high-precision infrared thermal measurements aimed at medical tomography applications. It includes a controlled enclosure, infrared detector, reference elements, and protocols for data acquisition and image corrections. These corrections for temporal and spatial effects lower measurement fluctuations to an uncertainty of about 25 mK. This precision enables resolution of weak temperature changes well below 0.1 K, which aligns with the sensitivity needed to detect internal temperature contrasts in biological tissues. Validation through tests on wax phantoms with known hot spots confirms the approach by matching results from other measurement techniques.

Core claim

The authors establish an instrumentation laboratory and methodology for infrared medical imaging that achieves approximately 25 mK uncertainty in thermal measurements. Sequential thermal images and panoramic projections receive temporal and spatial corrections to minimize fluctuations. When applied to wax phantoms containing elevated-temperature sources with contrasts from 1.5 to 10 K, the reconstructed 3D tomographic images quantitatively match thermocouple readings and micro-CT positions of the sources. This demonstrates the feasibility of detecting surface variations below 0.1 K, which corresponds to the expected signals from low-temperature internal contrasts at subsurface depths in the

What carries the argument

Controlled environmental enclosure with internal thermal reference elements and data acquisition chain applying temporal and spatial corrections to sequential thermal images and panoramic projections.

If this is right

  • The setup enables high-precision thermal measurements for specialized hardware phantoms.
  • Weak surface temperature variations below 0.1 K become resolvable to meet medical imaging sensitivity needs.
  • Reconstructed 3D thermal images of embedded sources agree quantitatively with thermocouple and micro-CT data.
  • The approach establishes feasibility for detecting low-temperature internal contrasts at subsurface depths relevant to biological tissue.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If validated on living tissue, the method could support non-invasive detection of subsurface temperature anomalies in clinical settings.
  • The correction protocols might extend to improve stability in other precision thermal imaging applications.
  • Refining phantom compositions could test broader applicability across different tissue types and depths.

Load-bearing premise

The wax phantoms with embedded elevated-temperature sources accurately represent the thermal behavior and contrast levels expected in biological tissues for infrared imaging purposes.

What would settle it

Direct measurements on actual biological tissue samples with known subsurface temperature contrasts of 1-3 K showing that surface variations fall outside the detectable range below 0.1 K or fail to match phantom-based tomographic reconstructions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05847 by Anna Frixou, Costas N. Papanicolas, Efstathios Stiliaris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup for the study of hardware phantoms in infrared tomography. The acrylic enclosure stabilizes the local thermal environment by suppressing convective air currents and reducing radiative exchange with the surrounding laboratory. Heat-generating electronics are located outside the enclosure; a water-filled container, the left wall of the enclosure opposite to the camera provides a radiativel… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Optical and thermal images of the phantom and reference elements, including temperature-controlled resistors and the Π-shaped surface. The temperature scale shown is in Degrees °C. The resistors provide stable references for temporal drift correction, while the Π-surface enables spatial non-uniformity correction, allowing independent temporal and spatial calibration. The thermal image is displayed using a … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Air temperature evolution inside the enclosure during a typical acquisition interval (∼20 minutes). The observed linear drift is used to correct slow temporal variations in the projection data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Construction of panoramic projection data from sequential thermal images. At each projection angle, narrow strips corresponding to the front surface of the phantom are extracted and concatenated to form a panoramic dataset. This procedure converts surface temperature measurements into a geometrically consistent representation suitable for tomographic inversion. The thermal images are displayed using a fixe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal stability of the thermal image of a uniform phantom. The black curve shows the mean temperature of a central 100-pixel region across successive frames. Frame aver￾aging of four images (red curve) reduces stochastic detector fluctuations from ∼ 300 mK to ∼ 150 mK. 4.2. Spatial Non-Uniformity and Correction Even under uniform environmental thermal conditions, infrared images exhibit pixel-to-pixel v… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of temporal and spatial correction on a uniform temperature distribution. Top: raw thermal images. Middle: after temporal correction. Bottom: after combined temporal and spatial correction. The right panels show the corresponding pixel temperature histograms, compared with that of the derived panoramic image ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Thermal sinograms and corresponding pixel tempera￾ture distributions for wax phantoms containing embedded heat sources at Δ𝑇 = 1.5 ◦C. Left: uncorrected data. Right: after temporal and spatial correction. Top: shallow source (0.8 cm depth). Bottom: deep source (3.3 cm depth). The thermal images are displayed using a fixed temperature scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Three-dimensional temperature distribution reconstructed using the AMIAS /RISE inversion framework from projection data with two embedded resistive sources (Δ𝑇 = 10 ◦C). (b) CT image of the phantom [30] with overlaid 2D slices at the resistor level from CT and infrared tomography. The positions of the resistors and thermocouple cables are indicated by white dots demonstrating agreement between CT and t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an experimental setup and methodology designed to facilitate high-precision thermal measurements required for infrared medical tomography. The approach which is best suited for the study of specialized hardware phantoms comprises a controlled environmental enclosure, infrared detection, internal thermal reference elements, and a comprehensive data acquisition counting chain and protocol. Temporal and spatial corrections applied to sequential thermal images and panoramic projections reduce measurement fluctuations resulting in measurement uncertainty to approximately 25~mK. The capability to resolve weak surface temperature variations, well below 0.1~K, meets the requirement of medical imaging sensitivity. The methodology was validated using wax phantoms with elevated-temperature sources ($\Delta T$ = 1.5 to 10~K). Reconstructed 3D thermal tomographic images of hot spots embedded in hardware phantoms are found to be in quantitative agreement with thermocouple measurements and $\mu CT$ derived source positions. The results demonstrate that the proposed setup and methodology enable high-precision thermal measurements and establish the feasibility of detecting surface temperature variations below 0.1 K, consistent with low-temperature localized internal contrasts ($\Delta T =$ 1-3 K) at subsurface depths of a few centimeters, relevant to biological tissue.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents an experimental setup and methodology for high-precision infrared thermal measurements in a controlled environmental enclosure, incorporating IR detection, internal thermal reference elements, and a data acquisition protocol. Temporal and spatial corrections applied to sequential images reduce fluctuations to yield ~25 mK uncertainty, enabling resolution of surface temperature variations below 0.1 K. Validation uses wax phantoms with embedded elevated-temperature sources (ΔT = 1.5–10 K); reconstructed 3D thermal tomographic images show quantitative agreement with thermocouple measurements and μCT-derived source positions. The authors conclude that the approach establishes feasibility for detecting signals consistent with low-temperature internal contrasts (ΔT = 1–3 K) at a few cm depth in biological tissue.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would contribute a practical high-precision instrumentation framework and correction protocols useful for infrared medical tomography research, particularly in controlled phantom studies. The reported agreement between tomographic reconstructions, thermocouples, and μCT, together with the achieved 25 mK uncertainty, provides concrete evidence of the setup’s metrological performance. However, the broader significance for biological tissue imaging remains limited without additional bridging between phantom and tissue thermal transport properties.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the phantom results are 'consistent with low-temperature localized internal contrasts (ΔT = 1-3 K) at subsurface depths of a few centimeters, relevant to biological tissue' is not supported by the presented evidence. No comparison of thermal conductivity, diffusivity, or emissivity between the wax phantoms and soft tissue is reported, nor is any heat-transfer simulation or scaling analysis provided to relate the observed surface ΔT < 0.1 K in wax to the expected surface signal from internal sources in tissue. This link is load-bearing for the medical-imaging feasibility conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and validation description lack a detailed error budget, full uncertainty propagation, and raw data or supplementary tables that would allow independent assessment of the 25 mK uncertainty figure and the quantitative agreement with thermocouples/μCT.
  2. Methods for the temporal and spatial corrections, the panoramic projection reconstruction algorithm, and the precise geometry of the internal reference elements are not described at a level that permits reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the phantom results are 'consistent with low-temperature localized internal contrasts (ΔT = 1-3 K) at subsurface depths of a few centimeters, relevant to biological tissue' is not supported by the presented evidence. No comparison of thermal conductivity, diffusivity, or emissivity between the wax phantoms and soft tissue is reported, nor is any heat-transfer simulation or scaling analysis provided to relate the observed surface ΔT < 0.1 K in wax to the expected surface signal from internal sources in tissue. This link is load-bearing for the medical-imaging feasibility conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of thermal conductivity, diffusivity, or emissivity between the wax phantoms and soft tissue, and contains no heat-transfer simulations or scaling analysis relating the observed surface signals in wax to those expected in tissue. The phantoms were chosen for experimental practicality (stable embedding of sources, compatibility with μCT validation) rather than as direct tissue analogs. The central contribution of the work is the instrumentation, environmental control, and correction protocols that achieve ~25 mK uncertainty and resolve surface variations below 0.1 K. We acknowledge that the phrasing in the abstract overstates the direct link to biological tissue. We will revise the abstract and relevant discussion sections to remove the specific claim of consistency with ΔT = 1–3 K internal contrasts in tissue at a few cm depth, and instead state that the demonstrated metrological performance constitutes a necessary technical step toward such measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurements on phantoms are validated against independent references without self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental apparatus, data corrections, and direct measurements of surface temperature variations on wax phantoms containing embedded heat sources. Validation consists of quantitative agreement with thermocouple readings and μCT-derived positions, which are external to the infrared imaging chain. The statement that results are 'consistent with' biological tissue contrasts is an interpretive claim about relevance rather than a derived prediction obtained by fitting or re-using the same data. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to close a loop back to the inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a hardware validation study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the experimental setup performing as described and the phantoms being representative, with no free parameters explicitly fitted beyond measured uncertainties.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Wax phantoms with embedded hot sources sufficiently simulate the thermal properties and infrared emission characteristics of biological tissues.
    The validation relies on these phantoms to demonstrate relevance to medical imaging.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1287 out tokens · 65256 ms · 2026-05-10T18:30:32.429892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2884738

    R.A.Osornio-Rios,J.A.Antonino-Daviu,R.d.J.Romero-Troncoso, Recent industrial applications of infrared thermography: A review, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15 (2) (2019) 615–625. doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2884738

  2. [2]

    doi:10.3390/buildings13112829

    H.Kim,N.Lamichhane,C.Kim,R.Shrestha,Innovationsinbuilding diagnostics and condition monitoring: A comprehensive review of infrared thermography applications, Buildings 13 (11) (2023) 2829. doi:10.3390/buildings13112829

  3. [3]

    Ancona, G

    E.D’Accardi,L.Ammannato,A.Giannasi,M.Pieri,G.Masciopinto, F. Ancona, G. Santonicola, D. Palumbo, U. Galietti, Infrared ther- mography for non-destructive testing of cooling hole integrity and flowevaluationinspecimensmadewithinnovativetechnologies,En- gineering Proceedings 85 (2025) 15.doi:10.3390/engproc2025085015

  4. [4]

    B. Oswald-Tranta, Inductive thermography – review of a non- destructive inspection technique for surface crack detection, Quan- titative InfraRed Thermography Journal 22 (5) (2025) 478–502.doi: 10.1080/17686733.2024.2448049

  5. [5]

    Z. Qu, P. Jiang, W. Zhang, Development and application of infrared thermography non-destructive testing techniques, Sensors 20 (14) (2020) 3851.doi:10.3390/s20143851

  6. [6]

    Vesala, H

    R.Li,F.Wang,P.Yin,F.Yang,J.Zhao,Z.Yue,L.Liu,S.Sfarra,G.T. Vesala, H. Yue, J. Liu, A review of ultrasonic infrared thermography innon-destructivetestingandevaluation(ndt&e):Physicalprinciples, theory, and data processing, Infrared Physics & Technology 150 (2025) 105961.doi:10.1016/j.infrared.2025.105961

  7. [7]

    Q. Liu, M. Li, W. Wang, et al., Infrared thermography in clinical practice: A literature review, European Journal of Medical Research 30 (2025) 33.doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02278-z

  8. [8]

    Kesztyüs, S

    D. Kesztyüs, S. Brucher, C. Wilson, T. Kesztyüs, Use of infrared thermography in medical diagnosis, screening, and disease monitor- ing: A scoping review, Medicina 59 (12) (2023) 2139.doi:10.3390/ medicina59122139

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1016/j.infrared.2006.06.029

    E.F.J.Ring,Thehistoricaldevelopmentoftemperaturemeasurement in medicine, Infrared Physics & Technology 49 (3) (2007) 297–301. doi:10.1016/j.infrared.2006.06.029

  10. [10]

    URLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1920940/

    Lawson, Chughtai, Breast cancer and body temperature, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 183 (7) (1963) 221. URLhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1920940/

  11. [11]

    D. A. Kennedy, T. Lee, D. Seely, A comparative review of ther- mography as a breast cancer screening technique, Integrative Cancer Therapies 8 (1) (2009) 9–16.doi:10.1177/1534735408326171

  12. [12]

    Papanicolas, A

    C. Papanicolas, A. Frixou, L. Koutsantonis, Thermal tomography for medical applications, in: 2023 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, MedicalImagingConferenceandInternationalSymposiumonRoom- Temperature Semiconductor Detectors (NSS MIC RTSD), 2023, pp. 1–1.doi:10.1109/NSSMICRTSD49126.2023.10337910

  13. [13]

    Ledwon, A

    D. Ledwon, A. Sage, J. Juszczyk, M. Rudzki, P. Badura, Tomo- graphic reconstruction from planar thermal imaging using convo- lutional neural network, Scientific Reports 12 (2022) 2347.doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06076-z

  14. [14]

    Koutsantonis, A

    L. Koutsantonis, A. N. Rapsomanikis, E. Stiliaris, C. N. Papanicolas, Examining an image reconstruction method in infrared emission tomography,InfraredPhysics&Technology98(2019)266–277.doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.03.015

  15. [15]

    A. Sage, D. Ledwon, J. Juszczyk, P. Badura, 3D thermal volume reconstruction from 2D infrared images—a preliminary study, in: Innovations in Biomedical Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Sys- tems and Computing, Vol. 1223, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021, pp. 371–379.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52180-6_38

  16. [16]

    Leontiou, A

    T. Leontiou, A. Frixou, M. Charalambides, E. Stiliaris, C. N. Pa- panicolas, S. Nikolaidou, A. Papadakis, Three-dimensional thermal tomography with physics-informed neural networks, Tomography 10 (2024) 1930–1946.doi:10.3390/tomography10120140

  17. [17]

    C. N. Papanicolas, L. Koutsantonis, E. Stiliaris, A novel analysis method for emission tomography (2018).arXiv:1804.03915

  18. [18]

    C. N. Papanicolas, E. Stiliaris, A novel method of data analysis for hadronic physics (2012).arXiv:1205.6505

  19. [19]

    Alexandrou, T

    C. Alexandrou, T. Leontiou, C. N. Papanicolas, E. Stiliaris, Novel analysis method for excited states in lattice qcd: The nucleon case, Physical Review D 91 (1) (2015) 014506.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91. 014506

  20. [20]

    1–4.doi:10.1109/NSS/MIC42101.2019.9060020

    C.Lemesios,L.Koutsantonis,C.N.Papanicolas,Rise:Tomographic image reconstruction in positron emission tomography, in: 2019 IEEENuclearScienceSymposiumand MedicalImagingConference (NSS/MIC), 2019, pp. 1–4.doi:10.1109/NSS/MIC42101.2019.9060020. :Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 11 of 12

  21. [21]

    Keliri, L

    A. Keliri, L. Koutsantonis, E. Stiliaris, Y. Parpottas, G. Charitou, S. Panagi, C. N. Papanicolas, Application of rise in spect myocardial perfusion imaging, using a cardiac phantom, in: 2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2021, pp. 1–5.doi:10.1109/NSS/MIC44867.2021.9875921

  22. [22]

    Frixou, T

    A. Frixou, T. Leontiou, E. Stiliaris, C. N. Papanicolas, Standardized images and evaluation metrics for tomography, Tomography 12 (4) (2026).doi:10.3390/tomography12040049

  23. [23]

    Kumari, P

    S. Kumari, P. Singh, Deep learning for unsupervised domain adap- tation in medical imaging: Recent advancements and future perspec- tives, Computers in Biology and Medicine 170 (2024) 107912.doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107912

  24. [24]

    J.Adler,O.Öktem,Solvingill-posedinverseproblemsusingiterative deep neural networks, Inverse Problems 33 (2017) 124007.doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aa9581

  25. [25]

    Jiang, Q

    H. Jiang, Q. Zhang, Y. Hu, Y. Jin, H. Liu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhao, W. Fan, H. Zheng, D. Liang, et al., Memory-enhanced and multi- domain learning-based deep unrolling network for medical image reconstruction, Physics in Medicine & Biology 70 (2025) 175008. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adf939

  26. [26]

    D. Zeng, C. Zeng, Z. Zeng, S. Li, Z. Deng, S. Chen, Z. Bian, J. Ma, Basis and current state of computed tomography perfusion imaging: A review, Physics in Medicine & Biology 67 (2022) 18TR01.doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8717

  27. [27]

    M. A. El-Brawany, D. K. Nassiri, G. Terhaar, A. Shaw, I. Rivens, K. Lozhken, Measurement of thermal and ultrasonic properties of some biological tissues, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technol- ogy 33 (3) (2009) 249–256.doi:10.1080/03091900802451265

  28. [28]

    P.J.RodríguezdeRivera,M.RodríguezdeRivera,F.Socorro,J.A.L. Calbet,M.RodríguezdeRivera,Advantagesof invivomeasurement of human skin thermal conductance using a calorimetric sensor, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 147 (2022) 10027– 10036.doi:10.1007/s10973-022-11275-x

  29. [29]

    URLhttps://thermokameras.com/Verkauf/Flir%20A-Serie/Manual% 20A400%20Smart%20Sensor%20configuration.pdf

    FLIR Systems, FLIR A400 User Manual, accessed: 2026-03-10 (n.d.). URLhttps://thermokameras.com/Verkauf/Flir%20A-Serie/Manual% 20A400%20Smart%20Sensor%20configuration.pdf

  30. [30]

    URLhttps://biomera.cyi.ac.cy/

    BioMERA Platform, Biomera: Platform for biosciences and human health in cyprus, accessed: 2026-04-05 (2026). URLhttps://biomera.cyi.ac.cy/

  31. [31]

    Frixou, Thermal tomography for medical applications, Phd thesis, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus (2026)

    A. Frixou, Thermal tomography for medical applications, Phd thesis, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus (2026). :Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 12 of 12