arxiv: 2604.06002 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Probing the Solar ⁸B Neutrino Fog with XENONnT

E. Aprile , J. Aalbers , K. Abe , M. M. Abu Rmeileh , M. Adrover , S. Ahmed Maouloud , L. Althueser , B. Andrieu

show 171 more authors

E. Angelino D. Ant\'on Martin S. R. Armbruster F. Arneodo L. Baudis M. Bazyk V. Beligotti L. Bellagamba R. Biondi A. Bismark K. Boese R. M. Braun G. Bruni R. Budnik C. Cai C. Capelli J. M. R. Cardoso A. P. Cimental Ch\'avez A. P. Colijn J. Conrad J. J. Cuenca-Garc\'ia V. D'Andrea L. C. Daniel Garcia M. P. Decowski A. Deisting C. Di Donato P. Di Gangi S. Diglio K. Eitel S. el Morabit R. Elleboro A. Elykov A. D. Ferella C. Ferrari H. Fischer T. Flehmke M. Flierman R. Frankel D. Fuchs W. Fulgione C. Fuselli F. Gao R. Giacomobono F. Girard R. Glade-Beucke L. Grandi J. Grigat H. Guan M. Guida P. Gyorgy R. Hammann C. Hils L. Hoetzsch N. F. Hood M. Iacovacci Y. Itow J. Jakob F. Joerg Y. Kaminaga M. Kara S. Kazama P. Kharbanda M. Kobayashi D. Koke K. Kooshkjalali A. Kopec E Kozlova H. Landsman R. F. Lang L. Levinson A. Li H. Li I. Li S. Li S. Liang Z. Liang Y.-T. Lin S. Lindemann M. Lindner K. Liu M. Liu F. Lombardi J. A. M. Lopes G. M. Lucchetti T. Luce Y. Ma C. Macolino G. C. Madduri J. Mahlstedt F. Marignetti T. Marrod\'an Undagoitia K. Martens J. Masbou S. Mastroianni V. Mazza J. Merz M. Messina A. Michel K. Miuchi R. Miyata A. Molinario S. Moriyama M. Murra J. M\"uller K. Ni C. T. Oba Ishikawa U. Oberlack K. Otsuzuki S. Ouahada B. Paetsch Y. Pan Q. Pellegrini R. Peres J. Pienaar M. Pierre G. Plante T. R. Pollmann F. Pompa A. Prajapati L. Principe J. Qin D. Ram\'irez Garc\'ia A. Ravindran A. Razeto R. Singh L. Sanchez J. M. F. dos Santos I. Sarnoff G. Sartorelli M. T. Schiller P. Schulte H. Schulze Ei{\ss}ing M. Schumann L. Scotto Lavina M. Selvi F. Semeria F. N. Semler P. Shagin S. Shi H. Simgen Z. Song A. Stevens C. Szyszka A. Takeda Y. Takeuchi P.-L. Tan D. Thers G. Trinchero C. D. Tunnell K. Valerius S. Vecchi S. Vetter G. Volta B. von Krosigk C. Weinheimer D. Wenz C. Wittweg V. H. S. Wu Y. Xing D. Xu Z. Xu M. Yamashita J. Yang L. Yang J. Ye M. Yoshida L. Yuan G. Zavattini Y. Zhao M. Zhong T. Zhu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords solar neutrinoscoherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scatteringdark matterXENONnTneutrino fogweak mixing angleboron-8 neutrinosnuclear recoil

0 comments

The pith

XENONnT detects solar boron-8 neutrinos scattering coherently off xenon nuclei at 3.3 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a 3.3 sigma excess of low-energy events in the XENONnT liquid xenon detector that matches the expected signature of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from solar 8B neutrinos. With 6.77 tonne-years of exposure, the authors extract a neutrino flux value consistent with standard solar models. This same dataset shows no additional signal from light dark matter particles. The neutrino events create a background floor that reduces the benefit of simply collecting more data for dark matter searches. The observation also yields a value for the weak mixing angle at low momentum transfer and limits on certain extensions of the Standard Model.

Core claim

Using 6.77 t×yr of data, the XENONnT experiment observes an excess of nuclear recoil events at the lowest energies that is attributed to coherent elastic scattering of solar 8B neutrinos on xenon nuclei. The measured rate corresponds to a flux of (5_{-2}^{+3})×10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}, in agreement with prior determinations. No evidence appears for weakly interacting massive particles in the mass range where the neutrino background is dominant, and the improvement in dark matter sensitivity from the added exposure is only 10 percent. The same events permit a determination of the weak mixing angle at momentum transfers near 0.02 GeV/c and place constraints on physics beyond the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS), in which a neutrino interacts with the nucleus as a single object and deposits a few-keV nuclear recoil that is recorded in the xenon time-projection chamber.

If this is right

The solar 8B neutrino flux is independently confirmed by a direct-detection technique.
Light dark matter searches in xenon detectors now face an irreducible neutrino background at low recoil energies.
Further increases in exposure produce only marginal gains in sensitivity to low-mass WIMPs.
The weak mixing angle is measured at momentum transfers of order 0.02 GeV/c.
Limits are set on selected models of physics beyond the Standard Model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Large-scale dark matter detectors can function as dual-purpose instruments for both dark matter and neutrino physics.
Future experiments will need active background rejection or directional capability to push below the neutrino fog for lighter dark matter particles.
The same dataset could be reanalyzed for other solar neutrino components or for tests of neutrino properties at very low energy.
Optimal detector size may exist before neutrino backgrounds force a shift to different search strategies.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy excess is produced entirely by 8B neutrinos once known backgrounds are subtracted and detector response at the lowest energies is modeled correctly.

What would settle it

An independent measurement or reanalysis that attributes the same excess to a different background source or that returns an 8B flux value outside the reported uncertainty range would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06002 by A. Bismark, A. Deisting, A. D. Ferella, A. Elykov, A. Kopec, A. Li, A. Michel, A. Molinario, A. P. Cimental Ch\'avez, A. P. Colijn, A. Prajapati, A. Ravindran, A. Razeto, A. Stevens, A. Takeda, B. Andrieu, B. Paetsch, B. von Krosigk, C. Cai, C. Capelli, C. Di Donato, C. D. Tunnell, C. Ferrari, C. Fuselli, C. Hils, C. Macolino, C. Szyszka, C. T. Oba Ishikawa, C. Weinheimer, C. Wittweg, D. Ant\'on Martin, D. Fuchs, D. Koke, D. Ram\'irez Garc\'ia, D. Thers, D. Wenz, D. Xu, E. Angelino, E. Aprile, E Kozlova, F. Arneodo, F. Gao, F. Girard, F. Joerg, F. Lombardi, F. Marignetti, F. N. Semler, F. Pompa, F. Semeria, G. Bruni, G. C. Madduri, G. M. Lucchetti, G. Plante, G. Sartorelli, G. Trinchero, G. Volta, G. Zavattini, H. Fischer, H. Guan, H. Landsman, H. Li, H. Schulze Ei{\ss}ing, H. Simgen, I. Li, I. Sarnoff, J. Aalbers, J. A. M. Lopes, J. Conrad, J. Grigat, J. Jakob, J. J. Cuenca-Garc\'ia, J. Mahlstedt, J. Masbou, J. Merz, J. M. F. dos Santos, J. M. R. Cardoso, J. M\"uller, J. Pienaar, J. Qin, J. Yang, J. Ye, K. Abe, K. Boese, K. Eitel, K. Kooshkjalali, K. Liu, K. Martens, K. Miuchi, K. Ni, K. Otsuzuki, K. Valerius, L. Althueser, L. Baudis, L. Bellagamba, L. C. Daniel Garcia, L. Grandi, L. Hoetzsch, L. Levinson, L. Principe, L. Sanchez, L. Scotto Lavina, L. Yang, L. Yuan, M. Adrover, M. Bazyk, M. Flierman, M. Guida, M. Iacovacci, M. Kara, M. Kobayashi, M. Lindner, M. Liu, M. M. Abu Rmeileh, M. Messina, M. Murra, M. P. Decowski, M. Pierre, M. Schumann, M. Selvi, M. T. Schiller, M. Yamashita, M. Yoshida, M. Zhong, N. F. Hood, P. Di Gangi, P. Gyorgy, P. Kharbanda, P.-L. Tan, P. Schulte, P. Shagin, Q. Pellegrini, R. Biondi, R. Budnik, R. Elleboro, R. F. Lang, R. Frankel, R. Giacomobono, R. Glade-Beucke, R. Hammann, R. M. Braun, R. Miyata, R. Peres, R. Singh, S. Ahmed Maouloud, S. Diglio, S. el Morabit, S. Kazama, S. Li, S. Liang, S. Lindemann, S. Mastroianni, S. Moriyama, S. Ouahada, S. R. Armbruster, S. Shi, S. Vecchi, S. Vetter, T. Flehmke, T. Luce, T. Marrod\'an Undagoitia, T. R. Pollmann, T. Zhu, U. Oberlack, V. Beligotti, V. D'Andrea, V. H. S. Wu, V. Mazza, W. Fulgione, Y. Itow, Y. Kaminaga, Y. Ma, Y. Pan, Y. Takeuchi, Y.-T. Lin, Y. Xing, Y. Zhao, Z. Liang, Z. Song, Z. Xu.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Constraints on the solar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Best-fit signal and background distributions com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Upper limits on DM interactions at 90% CL. The green and yellow bands represent the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. New mediator coupling upper limit at 90% CL with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Data and best-fit model projections in the analysis observables for SR0, SR1, and SR2 (left to right). Black markers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We report a 3.3 $\sigma$ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from solar $^8$B neutrinos using a 6.77 t$\times$yr exposure from the XENONnT experiment, inferring a solar $^8$B neutrino flux of $(5_{-2}^{+3})\times 10^6\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, consistent with previous measurements. In the presence of the $^8$B "neutrino fog", we find no evidence for light dark matter, and observe diminishing returns in sensitivity with increasing exposure. A 93% increase in exposure from the previous search improves the median sensitivity to 5 GeV/$c^2$ weakly interacting massive particles-nucleon cross section by 10%. The dataset was also used to measure the weak mixing angle at $\sim$ 0.02 GeV/$c$ momentum transfer and constrain physics beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

XENONnT reports a 3.3 sigma excess from solar 8B neutrinos that marks the start of the fog for xenon detectors, but the result rests on low-energy background and efficiency modeling that needs close checking.

read the letter

The main point is that XENONnT has pulled a 3.3 sigma signal from solar 8B neutrinos out of 6.77 ton-years of data, giving a flux of roughly 5 x 10^6 cm^-2 s^-1 with sizable asymmetric errors. They treat this as the first clear CEvNS observation in their dark matter dataset and use it to show that the neutrino fog is now limiting sensitivity to light dark matter, with no excess seen and only modest gains from the extra exposure on 5 GeV WIMPs. They also extract a weak mixing angle value at low momentum transfer and note the diminishing returns for future runs. That connection between the neutrino measurement and the dark matter limits is the practical takeaway for the field. The work is straightforward in showing how the background affects reach and in providing a new low-energy probe of the weak interaction. The exposure increase and the consistency with solar models are clear positives. The soft spot is exactly where the stress test flags it: at sub-keV recoils the efficiency falls fast, and any residual mismatch in electronic recoil or surface background modeling can shift the excess. The large flux uncertainties already hint that systematics are driving the error bars, so the 3.3 sigma sits near the edge where small changes in the response function could move the significance. Without detailed validation plots for those corrections in the full text, it is hard to judge how robust the attribution is. This paper is for people running or planning xenon dark matter experiments and for neutrino physicists who care about CEvNS at low energies. Readers who need to know where the fog sets in or how it affects next-generation sensitivity will get direct value from the numbers. It is not a new technique but a solid incremental result from a mature detector. It deserves a serious referee because the experiment is established, the topic is timely, and the claims are testable with more data. Send it to peer review; the main questions will be on the background subtraction and low-energy calibration, but the core measurement is worth the effort.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a 3.3σ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) from solar ⁸B neutrinos using 6.77 t×yr exposure in XENONnT, inferring a flux of (5_{-2}^{+3})×10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1} consistent with solar models. It finds no evidence for light dark matter in the neutrino fog regime, notes diminishing returns for WIMP sensitivity with added exposure (10% median improvement for 5 GeV/c² despite 93% more data), measures the weak mixing angle at ~0.02 GeV/c momentum transfer, and constrains BSM physics.

Significance. If the low-energy background modeling and efficiency corrections hold, this would be a notable first detection of solar neutrino CEvNS in a xenon DM detector, demonstrating the onset of the neutrino fog and its implications for DM searches. The flux consistency, weak mixing angle measurement, and sensitivity quantification provide independent value for solar neutrino and electroweak studies at low momentum transfer.

major comments (2)

[Results section on background subtraction and excess fitting] The 3.3σ significance and flux extraction rest on the assumption that the residual excess after background subtraction matches the ⁸B CEvNS recoil spectrum. The manuscript must quantify how uncertainties in the electronic-recoil and surface-event background models at sub-keV energies propagate into the significance and asymmetric flux errors (see results section on excess fitting).
[Data analysis section on efficiency and response function] Detector efficiency and response modeling at the lowest recoil energies (where efficiency falls rapidly) is load-bearing for attributing events to ⁸B neutrinos. Detailed validation, including systematic variations in the response function that could alter the apparent excess, is required to support the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement on the dominant systematic uncertainties affecting the 3.3σ claim.
[Figures in results section] Figures displaying the recoil spectrum or best-fit should explicitly overlay individual background components for reader clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the major comments and revised the paper to include additional systematic studies on background modeling and detector response, which strengthen the robustness of our 3.3σ claim and flux extraction. These revisions address the concerns without altering the central results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results section on background subtraction and excess fitting] The 3.3σ significance and flux extraction rest on the assumption that the residual excess after background subtraction matches the ⁸B CEvNS recoil spectrum. The manuscript must quantify how uncertainties in the electronic-recoil and surface-event background models at sub-keV energies propagate into the significance and asymmetric flux errors (see results section on excess fitting).

Authors: We agree that explicit propagation of background uncertainties is essential for supporting the significance and asymmetric errors. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated subsection in the results section describing a series of systematic variations: the ER background normalization was varied by ±15% (its dominant uncertainty) and the surface-event model shape parameters were shifted within their calibration-derived ranges. Each variation was refit in the likelihood framework used for the ⁸B flux. The resulting significance ranges from 3.1σ to 3.5σ, the central flux value shifts by at most 8%, and the asymmetric uncertainties broaden by ~20% when all variations are included in quadrature. These studies are now summarized in a new table and the flux result has been updated to incorporate the additional systematic component. The excess remains consistent with the expected ⁸B recoil spectrum under all tested variations. revision: yes
Referee: [Data analysis section on efficiency and response function] Detector efficiency and response modeling at the lowest recoil energies (where efficiency falls rapidly) is load-bearing for attributing events to ⁸B neutrinos. Detailed validation, including systematic variations in the response function that could alter the apparent excess, is required to support the central claim.

Authors: We concur that the low-energy efficiency and response function are critical. The revised manuscript expands the data analysis section with additional validation: we now include direct comparisons of the efficiency curve against both ³H and ²²⁰Rn calibration data down to 0.5 keV, as well as Monte Carlo variations of the S1/S2 response (energy scale shifted by ±5% and resolution broadened by 10%). For each variation we repeat the full excess fit; the ⁸B-attributed excess persists with significance ≥3.0σ and the flux central value changes by <12%. A new figure shows the efficiency curve with uncertainty bands and the corresponding impact on the fitted spectrum. These additions provide the requested detailed validation while confirming that the attribution to ⁸B CEvNS is stable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental flux measurement is data-driven and compared to independent solar models

full rationale

The paper reports a direct experimental extraction of the solar 8B neutrino flux from observed low-energy recoils in XENONnT after background subtraction and efficiency correction. The central result (3.3σ excess and inferred flux value) is obtained by fitting the residual spectrum to the expected CEvNS recoil shape; this fit does not presuppose the flux value or reduce to a self-citation chain. The measured flux is then compared to external solar model predictions, which serve as an independent benchmark rather than an input to the derivation. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggled steps appear in the load-bearing chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement relies on the Standard Model CEvNS cross-section formula and solar neutrino flux predictions as external inputs; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard Model coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section
Used to convert observed rate into inferred neutrino flux.
domain assumption Solar 8B neutrino spectrum and flux from standard solar models
Basis for expected signal rate and consistency check.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6419 in / 1270 out tokens · 26022 ms · 2026-05-10T18:16:53.534979+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Sub-keV energy calibration of CONUS+ via 71Ge M-shell neutron activation
hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

Neutron activation resolves the 71Ge M-shell X-ray line at 158.7 eVee in a CONUS+ germanium detector, reducing CEvNS signal prediction uncertainty below 4%.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Davis, Jr., D

R. Davis, Jr., D. S. Harmer, and K. C. Hoffman, Search for neutrinos from the sun, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1205 (1968)

1968
[2]

Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande’s first 300 days, Phys

Y. Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande’s first 300 days, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1158 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 81, 4279 (1998)], arXiv:hep-ex/9805021

work page arXiv 1998
[3]

Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

B. Aharmimet al.(SNO), Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C88, 025501 (2013), arXiv:1109.0763 [nucl-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[4]

Belliniet al.(Borexino), Measurement of the solar 8B neutrino rate with a liquid scintillator target and 3 MeV energy threshold in the Borexino detector, Phys

G. Belliniet al.(Borexino), Measurement of the solar 8B neutrino rate with a liquid scintillator target and 3 MeV energy threshold in the Borexino detector, Phys. Rev. D 82, 033006 (2010), arXiv:0808.2868 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[5]

J. N. Bahcall, E. Lisi, D. E. Alburger, L. De Braeckeleer, S. J. Freedman, and J. Napolitano, Standard neutrino spectrum from B-8 decay, Phys. Rev. C54, 411 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9601044

work page arXiv 1996
[6]

D. Z. Freedman, Coherent effects of a weak neutral cur- rent, Phys. Rev. D9, 1389 (1974)

1974
[7]

Akimovet al.(COHERENT), Science357, 1123 (2017), arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

D. Akimovet al.(COHERENT), Observation of Co- herent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Science357, 1123 (2017), arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2017
[8]

First observation of reac- tor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,

N. Ackermannet al., Direct observation of coherent elas- tic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature643, 1229 (2025), arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

Aprile et al

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191002 (2024), arXiv:2408.02877 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Bo et al

Z. Boet al.(PandaX), First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191001 (2024), arXiv:2407.10892 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Atzori Corona, M

M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Reactor antineutrinos CEνNS on germa- nium: CONUS+ and TEXONO as a new gateway to SM and BSM physics, Phys. Rev. D112, 015007 (2025), arXiv:2501.18550 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

Aprileet al.(XENON), First Search for Light Dark Matter in the Neutrino Fog with XENONnT, Phys

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Search for Light Dark Matter in the Neutrino Fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 111802 (2025), arXiv:2409.17868 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Aprileet al.[XENON], Phys

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 221003 (2025), arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments

J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Impli- cation of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next gen- eration dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D89, 023524 (2014), arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[15]

C. A. J. O’Hare, New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 10 251802 (2021), arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Aprileet al.(XENON), The XENONnT dark mat- ter experiment, Eur

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), The XENONnT dark mat- ter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 784 (2024), arXiv:2402.10446 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

V. C. Antochiet al., Improved quality tests of R11410- 21 photomultiplier tubes for the XENONnT experiment, JINST16(08), P08033, arXiv:2104.15051 [physics.ins- det]

work page arXiv
[18]

Aprileet al.(XENON), The neutron veto of the XENONnT experiment: results with demineralized wa- ter, Eur

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), The neutron veto of the XENONnT experiment: results with demineralized wa- ter, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 695 (2025), arXiv:2412.05264 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Aprileet al.(XENON1T), Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the XENON1T experiment, JINST9, P11006, arXiv:1406.2374 [astro-ph.IM]

E. Aprileet al.(XENON1T), Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the XENON1T experiment, JINST9, P11006, arXiv:1406.2374 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv
[20]

Aprileet al.(XENON), The triggerless data acqui- sition system of the XENONnT experiment, JINST18 (07), P07054, arXiv:2212.11032 [physics.ins-det]

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), The triggerless data acqui- sition system of the XENONnT experiment, JINST18 (07), P07054, arXiv:2212.11032 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv
[21]

Kohonen, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biological Cybernetics43, 59 (1982)

T. Kohonen, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biological Cybernetics43, 59 (1982)

1982
[22]

Aalberset al., AxFoundation/strax: Stream analysis for xenon tpcs (2025)

J. Aalberset al., AxFoundation/strax: Stream analysis for xenon tpcs (2025)

2025
[23]

XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/straxen: Streaming analysis for xenon (2026)

2026
[24]

Aprileet al.(XENON), Design and performance of the field cage for the XENONnT experiment, Eur

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Design and performance of the field cage for the XENONnT experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 138 (2024), arXiv:2309.11996 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Aprile et al

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D106, 022001 (2022), arXiv:2112.12116 [hep- ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Aprileet al.(XENON), Phys

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 161805 (2022), arXiv:2207.11330 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Aprileet al.(XENON), XENONnT analysis: Sig- nal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), XENONnT analysis: Sig- nal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys. Rev. D111, 062006 (2025), arXiv:2409.08778 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Barranco, O

J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba, Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei, JHEP12, 021, arXiv:hep-ph/0508299

work page arXiv
[29]

Low-Energy Nuclear Recoil Calibration of XENONnT with a $^{88}$YBe Photoneutron Source

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Low-Energy Nuclear Recoil Calibration of XENONnT with a 88YBe Photoneutron Source, preprint (2024), arXiv:2412.10451 [physics.ins- det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[30]

XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/fuse: Refactor xenonnt epix and wfsim code (2026)

2026
[31]

XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/axidence: strax- based data-driven accidental coincidence background simulation and peak-level salting (2025)

2025
[32]

J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter exper- iments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996)

1996
[33]

Menendez, D

J. Menendez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei, Phys. Rev. D86, 103511 (2012), arXiv:1208.1094 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2012
[34]

Fornengo, P

N. Fornengo, P. Panci, and M. Regis, Long-Range Forces in Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D84, 115002 (2011), arXiv:1108.4661 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[35]

Del Nobile, M

E. Del Nobile, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Direct De- tection Signatures of Self-Interacting Dark Matter with a Light Mediator, JCAP10, 055, arXiv:1507.04007 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv
[36]

Aprile et al

E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019), arXiv:1907.11485 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[37]

Search for Light Dark Matter with Ionization Signals in the PandaX-4T Experiment,

S. Liet al.(PandaX), Search for Light Dark Matter with Ionization Signals in the PandaX-4T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 261001 (2023), arXiv:2212.10067 [hep- ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

Chang, A

S. Chang, A. Pierce, and N. Weiner, Momentum Dependent Dark Matter Scattering, JCAP01, 006, arXiv:0908.3192 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[39]

Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,

P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. P. Pinheiro, and S. Urrea, Global constraints on non- standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons, JHEP08, 032, arXiv:2305.07698 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[40]

Bertuzzo, G

E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli di Cortona, and L. M. D. Ramos, Probing light vector mediators with coherent scattering at future facilities, JHEP06, 075, arXiv:2112.04020 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv
[41]

Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics

C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 531 (2015), arXiv:1403.6344 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[42]

Aprileet al.(XENON, (XENON Collaboration)‡‡), XENONnT WIMP search: Signal and background mod- eling and statistical inference, Phys

E. Aprileet al.(XENON, (XENON Collaboration)‡‡), XENONnT WIMP search: Signal and background mod- eling and statistical inference, Phys. Rev. D111, 103040 (2025), arXiv:2406.13638 [physics.data-an]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Szydagiset al., A review of NEST models for liq- uid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other ap- proaches, Front

M. Szydagiset al., A review of NEST models for liq- uid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other ap- proaches, Front. Detect. Sci. Tech.2, 1480975 (2024), arXiv:2211.10726 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/alea: A tool to per- form toymc-based inference constructions (2026)

2026
[45]

Chernoff, On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio, Ann

H. Chernoff, On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio, Ann. Math. Stat.25, 573 (1954)

1954
[46]

Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymp- totic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1554 (2011), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)], arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
[47]

Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[48]

C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in ce- sium, Science275, 1759 (1997)

1997
[49]

Androi´ cet al.(Jefferson Lab Qweak Collaboration), Nature557, 207 (2018), arXiv:1905.08283 [nucl-ex]

D. Androi´ cet al.(Qweak), Precision measurement of the weak charge of the proton, Nature557, 207 (2018), arXiv:1905.08283 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2018
[50]

P. L. Anthonyet al.(SLAC E158), Precision measure- ment of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 081601 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0504049

work page arXiv 2005
[51]

C. Y. Prescottet al., Further Measurements of Parity Nonconservation in Inelastic electron Scattering, Phys. Lett. B84, 524 (1979)

1979
[52]

Wanget al., Measurement of Parity-Violating Asym- metry in Electron-Deuteron Inelastic Scattering, Phys

D. Wanget al., Measurement of Parity-Violating Asym- metry in Electron-Deuteron Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. C91, 045506 (2015), arXiv:1411.3200 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[53]

Aristizabal Sierra, V

D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papou- lias, Consequences of the Dresden-II reactor data for the weak mixing angle and new physics, JHEP09, 076, arXiv:2203.02414 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[54]

De Romeri, O

V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHER- ENT CsI and LAr data, JHEP04, 035, arXiv:2211.11905 11 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[55]

Alp´ ızar-Venegas, L

M. Alp´ ızar-Venegas, L. J. Flores, E. Peinado, and E. V´ azquez-J´ auregui, Exploring the standard model and beyond from the evidence of CEνNS with reactor an- tineutrinos in CONUS+, Phys. Rev. D111, 053001 (2025), arXiv:2501.10355 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Erler and R

J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hern´ andez, Weak Mixing Angle in the Thomson Limit, JHEP03, 196, arXiv:1712.09146 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[57]

Zhanget al.[PandaX], Phys

M. Zhanget al.(PandaX), Search for Light Dark Mat- ter with 259 Days of Data in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211001 (2025), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 136, 069901 (2026)], arXiv:2507.11930 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

J. Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011802 (2025), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Search for low mass dark matter in DarkSide-50: the bayesian network approach, Eur

P. Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Search for low mass dark matter in DarkSide-50: the bayesian network approach, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 322 (2023), arXiv:2302.01830 [hep- ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Angloheret al., Limits on momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter with CRESST-II, Phys

G. Angloheret al., Limits on momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter with CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 021303 (2016), arXiv:1601.04447 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2016
[61]

P. Klos, J. Men´ endez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Large- scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory cur- rents, Phys. Rev. D88, 083516 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 029901 (2014)], arXiv:1304.7684 [nucl- th]

work page arXiv 2013
[62]

D. S. Akeribet al.(LZ), Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, preprint (2025), arXiv:2512.08065 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025