Helly Theorems for Generalized Tur\'an Problems
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:40 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
For any tree T and forbidden family F, the maximum number of T-copies in an F-free n-vertex graph is either at least order n to the k+1 or at most order of the ordinary ex(n,F) to the k.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove a general theorem which states that for any tree T, any family F, and any integer k, either ex(n,T,F) is at least Ω(n^{k+1}) or at most O(ex(n,F)^k). Our proofs rely on new variants of the classical Helly Theorem for trees which may be of independent interest.
What carries the argument
New variants of the Helly theorem that hold for trees, used to establish the stated dichotomy for the generalized Turán function ex(n,T,F).
If this is right
- For every tree T and family F the growth rate of ex(n,T,F) is forced into one of two sharply separated regimes determined by the ordinary Turán number ex(n,F).
- Many concrete generalized Turán problems for tree targets can be resolved by checking which side of the dichotomy holds rather than computing the extremal function directly.
- The Helly-type theorems for trees supply a new tool that can be applied to other counting problems in extremal graph theory involving tree embeddings.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If analogous Helly theorems exist for other graph classes such as bipartite graphs with bounded degree, the same style of dichotomy might hold beyond trees.
- The result suggests a way to obtain asymptotic classification for hypergraph Turán numbers when the target is a tree-like structure.
- One could test whether the constants hidden in the O and Ω notations can be made explicit for small k.
Load-bearing premise
The dichotomy applies only when the target graph T is a tree, because the new Helly-type theorems are proved for trees.
What would settle it
A single counterexample consisting of one tree T, one family F, and one integer k for which the extremal value ex(n,T,F) grows asymptotically faster than any constant multiple of ex(n,F)^k yet slower than any positive multiple of n^{k+1}.
Figures
read the original abstract
Given a graph $T$ and a family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, the generalized Tur\'an number $\mathrm{ex}(n,T,\mathcal{F})$ is the maximum number of copies of $T$ in an $n$-vertex $\mathcal{F}$-free graph. We prove a general theorem which states that for any tree $T$, any family $\mathcal{F}$, and any integer $k$, either $\mathrm{ex}(n,T,\mathcal{F})$ is at least $\Omega(n^{k+1})$ or at most $O(\mathrm{ex}(n,\mathcal{F})^{k})$, from which we derive a number of consequences. Our proofs rely on new variants of the classical Helly Theorem for trees which may be of independent interest. As far as we are aware, this is the first known application of Helly theorems for Tur\'an type problems.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proves a general dichotomy theorem for generalized Turán numbers: for any tree T, any family of graphs F, and any positive integer k, either ex(n,T,F) is at least Ω(n^{k+1}) or at most O(ex(n,F)^k). The proof relies on new Helly-type intersection theorems specialized to trees that control the distribution of T-copies inside F-free graphs. Several consequences are derived from the main result, and the authors note that this constitutes the first application of Helly theorems to Turán-type problems.
Significance. If the central claim holds, the result supplies a clean, parameter-light classification of growth rates for the number of copies of a tree T in F-free graphs. The new tree-specific Helly variants are of potential independent interest and represent a novel proof technique in extremal graph theory. The dichotomy is falsifiable and applies uniformly across all families F, which strengthens its utility as a general tool.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'a number of consequences' is used without naming them; listing the principal corollaries (even briefly) would improve the abstract's informativeness.
- [Introduction] The manuscript should clarify in the introduction whether the Helly variants require T to be a tree only for the intersection property or also for the counting argument that yields the Ω(n^{k+1}) lower bound.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report, so we have no individual points to address point by point. We will incorporate any minor suggestions into the revised version.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; proof-based theorem with new Helly variants
full rationale
The paper claims a dichotomy for ex(n,T,F) when T is any tree: either Ω(n^{k+1}) or O(ex(n,F)^k). This is derived from newly proved Helly-type intersection theorems specialized to trees, which are presented as original contributions of independent interest rather than imported or fitted. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations as load-bearing premises, or renamings of known results appear in the abstract or description that would reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction. The tree restriction is explicit in the hypothesis. The derivation chain is self-contained as a standard mathematical proof.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
N. Alon and C. Shikhelman,ManyTcopies inH-free graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 121(2016), 146–172
work page 2016
-
[2]
R. Alweiss, S. Lovett, K. Wu, and J. Zhang,Improved bounds for the sunflower lemma, Ann. of Math. (2)194(2021), no. 3, 795–815
work page 2021
-
[3]
Hans-J¨ urgen Bandelt and Erich Prisner,Clique graphs and Helly graphs, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B51(1991), no. 1, 34–45
work page 1991
-
[4]
Imre B´ ar´ any and Gil Kalai,Helly-type problems, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser.59(2022), no. 4, 471–502
work page 2022
-
[5]
Imre B´ ar´ any, Meir Katchalski, and Janos Pach,Quantitative Helly-type theorems, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.86(1982), 109–114
work page 1982
-
[6]
Imre B´ ar´ any and Jiˇ r´ ı Matouˇ sek,A fractional Helly theorem for convex lattice sets, Adv. Math.174(2003), no. 2, 227–235
work page 2003
-
[7]
J. Bondy and M. Simonovits,Cycles of even length in graphs, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B16 (1974), 97–105
work page 1974
-
[8]
B. Bukh and D. Conlon,Rational exponents in extremal graph theory, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)20(2018), no. 7, 1747–1757
work page 2018
- [9]
-
[10]
Z. Dong, J. Gao, and H. Liu,Bipartite Tur´ an problems via graph gluing, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.57(2025), no. 12, 3783–3796
work page 2025
-
[11]
Z. F¨ uredi and A. K¨ undgen,Moments of graphs in monotone families, J. Graph Theory51 (2006), no. 1, 37–48
work page 2006
-
[12]
Z. F¨ uredi and M. Simonovits,The history of degenerate (bipartite) extremal graph problems, Erd¨ os centennial, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., vol. 25, J´ anos Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2013, pp. 169–264
work page 2013
-
[13]
Gerbner,Generalized Tur´ an problems forK 2,t, Electron
D. Gerbner,Generalized Tur´ an problems forK 2,t, Electron. J. Combin.30(2023), no. 1, Paper No. 1.34, 9
work page 2023
-
[14]
D. Gerbner, E. Gy˝ ori, A. Methuku, and M. Vizer,Generalized Tur´ an problems for even cycles, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B145(2020), 169–213
work page 2020
-
[15]
D. Gerbner and C. Palmer,Survey of generalized tur´ an problems – counting subgraphs, arXiv:2506.03418 (2025)
-
[16]
D. Gerbner and B. Patk´ os,Generalized Tur´ an problems for complete bipartite graphs, Graphs Combin.38(2022), no. 5, Paper No. 164, 20. 31
work page 2022
-
[17]
A. Halfpap and C. Palmer,On supersaturation and stability for generalized Tur´ an problems, J. Graph Theory97(2021), no. 2, 232–240
work page 2021
-
[18]
Helly, ¨Uber Mengen konvexer K¨ orper mit gemeinschaftlichen Punkten., Jahresber
Ed. Helly, ¨Uber Mengen konvexer K¨ orper mit gemeinschaftlichen Punkten., Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver.32(1923), 175–176 (German)
work page 1923
-
[19]
Gil Kalai and Roy Meshulam,A topological colorful Helly theorem, Adv. Math.191(2005), no. 2, 305–311
work page 2005
-
[20]
Lesniak,On longest paths in connected graphs, Fundam
L. Lesniak,On longest paths in connected graphs, Fundam. Math.86(1975), 283–286
work page 1975
-
[21]
Letzter,Many H-copies in graphs with a forbidden tree, SIAM J
S. Letzter,Many H-copies in graphs with a forbidden tree, SIAM J. Discrete Math.33 (2019), no. 4, 2360–2368
work page 2019
-
[22]
J. Ma, X. Yuan, and M. Zhang,Some extremal results on complete degenerate hypergraphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A154(2018), 598–609
work page 2018
-
[23]
P. Erd˝ os and R. Rado,Intersection theorems for systems of sets, J. London Math. Soc.35 (1960), 85–90
work page 1960
-
[24]
Spiro,Random polynomial graphs for random Tur´ an problems, J
S. Spiro,Random polynomial graphs for random Tur´ an problems, J. Graph Theory105 (2024), no. 2, 192–208
work page 2024
-
[25]
X. Zhu, E. Gy˝ ori, Z. He, Z. Lv, N. Salia, and C. Xiao,Stability version of Dirac’s theorem and its applications for generalized Tur´ an problems, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.55(2023), no. 4, 1857–1873. A Tightness for Paths In this appendix we verify that Theorems 1.3 and 1.10 are tight for paths of certain lengths. More generally, we show the following in th...
work page 2023
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.