pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07022 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🧮 math.AT · cs.CG· math.AC· math.RT

An Algebraic Introduction to Persistence

Ulrich Bauer , Thomas Br\"ustle , Luis Scoccola This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AT cs.CGmath.ACmath.RT
keywords persistenceposet representationsinterleaving distancepersistent homologytopological data analysisrepresentation theoryMorse theoryalgebraic topology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Persistence is the study of algebraic properties of poset representations and their stability under the interleaving distance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces persistence by grounding it in the representation theory of posets. Linear representations of posets appear in representation theory, geometry, and topological data analysis. The interleaving distance turns the category into a metric space where one can study how representations behave under small perturbations. This algebraic perspective unifies disparate applications and raises questions about stability and classification. A reader cares because it provides foundations for understanding persistent homology and related tools in data analysis.

Core claim

Persistence studies the algebraic properties of these poset representations and their behavior under perturbations in the interleaving distance. The survey covers fundamental results in the area and applications to pure and applied mathematics, as well as theoretical challenges and open questions.

What carries the argument

The representation theory of posets with the interleaving distance as a metric structure for analyzing perturbations.

If this is right

  • Applications to persistent homology in topological data analysis.
  • Connections to Morse theory and other areas of geometry.
  • Relations to the representation theory of quivers and finite dimensional algebras.
  • Identification of theoretical challenges and open questions in stability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Algorithms for computing persistence invariants could draw on methods from quiver representation theory for improved efficiency.
  • The poset framework might generalize to other poset-like structures or different metrics on representation categories.
  • This algebraic lens could inspire new ways to classify persistence modules using tools from algebra.

Load-bearing premise

The category of poset representations of interest admits a metric structure given by the interleaving distance.

What would settle it

An example of poset representations from topological inference where the interleaving distance does not control the algebraic changes under perturbation would undermine the central framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07022 by Luis Scoccola, Thomas Br\"ustle, Ulrich Bauer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left. Two real-valued functions on the circle and their persistent ho￾mologies in homological degrees zero and one, represented by their barcodes. The functions are represented as a projection, that is, the value of f (resp. g) at a point on the circle equals the projection of that point to the left (resp. right) vertical real line. Right. An alternative representation of each barcode as a persistence dia￾… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The level set persistent homology of two functions f, g : S 1 → R encoded using extended persistence (left), derived sheaves (top right), and relative interlevel set persistence (bottom right). For relative interlevel set persistence we use the nota￾tion in [BBBF24]. Each construction determines the other, and satisfies a bottleneck stability result. Indeed, in each encoding there is a matching of bars of … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left. Four subsets of the poset R 2 which are spreads. The spread rep￾resentations kA, kB, and kC are finitely presented, and in fact kC is a rectangle representation, and kB is an indecomposable projective since B is the upset of a single point (its bottom left corner). The spread representation kD is not finitely presentable since “it is born along diagonals” (see Section 6). Right. The restriction of th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Six invariants (panels (d) to (i)) of a poset representation (panel (c)), obtained as the persistent homology of a function (panel (a)), restricted to Z 2 (panel (c)). The invariants are ordered by their space complexity (see Section 7). (a) A function f : S 2 → R 2 from the two-sphere into the plane. (b) The one-dimensional sublevel set persistent homology H1(f) ∈ VecR 2 , which happens to be indecomposab… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left. Two spread-decomposable representations of R 2 that are close in the interleaving distance, but whose indecomposables admit no low-cost matching [BL18]. Center. The signed matching guaranteed to exist by a main result in [OS24]. Right. The signed matching guaranteed to exist by a main result in [BOOS24]. diagram, when the poset is not a linear order. The presence of negative multiplicities makes inte… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce persistence with an emphasis on its algebraic foundations, using the representation theory of posets. Linear representations of posets arise in several areas of mathematics, including the representation theory of quivers and finite dimensional algebras, Morse theory and other areas of geometry, as well as topological inference and topological data analysis -- often via persistent homology. In some of these contexts, the category of poset representations of interest admits a metric structure given by the so-called interleaving distance. Persistence studies the algebraic properties of these poset representations and their behavior under perturbations in the interleaving distance. We survey fundamental results in the area and applications to pure and applied mathematics, as well as theoretical challenges and open questions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an expository survey introducing persistence via the representation theory of posets. It notes that linear representations of posets arise in quiver representations, finite-dimensional algebras, Morse theory, geometry, and topological data analysis through persistent homology. The central framing states that the category of poset representations of interest admits a metric structure via the interleaving distance, and that persistence studies the algebraic properties of these representations together with their behavior under perturbations in this distance. The paper surveys fundamental results, applications to pure and applied mathematics, and discusses theoretical challenges and open questions.

Significance. If the survey is accurate and well-organized, it could serve as a useful bridge between representation theory and applied topology, making algebraic foundations of persistence more accessible to researchers in algebraic topology and topological data analysis. By organizing existing results around the interleaving distance and poset representations, the work may help orient newcomers and highlight connections across fields without introducing new theorems.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'the category of poset representations of interest admits a metric structure given by the so-called interleaving distance' would benefit from an immediate parenthetical reference to the standard construction (e.g., the definition via natural transformations or the formula involving shifts) so that readers can locate the metric without external lookup.
  2. [Survey sections] Throughout: ensure every surveyed theorem or result is accompanied by a precise citation to the original source rather than only to secondary expositions, to allow readers to trace the algebraic details directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We are pleased that the survey is viewed as a potential bridge between representation theory and applied topology, consistent with our intent to make algebraic foundations of persistence more accessible. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: expository survey with no new derivations

full rationale

This paper is explicitly framed as an algebraic introduction and survey of persistence, emphasizing foundations from representation theory of posets and recalling the interleaving distance as a standard metric on the category of poset representations. The abstract and described content delineate scope and survey existing results without presenting original theorems, predictions, or first-principles derivations that could reduce to self-defined inputs. No load-bearing steps rely on self-citations for uniqueness or ansatz smuggling; the interleaving distance is invoked as established prior work. The central claim is definitional framing rather than a constructed equivalence, making the derivation chain self-contained against external literature.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an expository survey relying on standard background from representation theory and topology; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 832 out tokens · 17629 ms · 2026-05-10T17:55:56.755377+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 226 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Escolar, Ken Nakashima, and Michio Yoshiwaki, Approximation by interval-decomposables and interval resolutions of persistence modules, J

    Hideto Asashiba, Emerson G. Escolar, Ken Nakashima, and Michio Yoshiwaki, Approximation by interval-decomposables and interval resolutions of persistence modules, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 227 (2023), no. 10, Paper No. 107397, 20. 4576885

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Pure Appl

    , Approximation by interval-decomposables and interval resolutions of persistence modules, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 227 (2023), no. 10, Paper No. 107397, 20. 4576885

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Escolar, and Shunsuke Tada, Summand-injectivity of interval covers and monotonicity of interval resolution global dimensions, J

    Toshitaka Aoki, Emerson G. Escolar, and Shunsuke Tada, Summand-injectivity of interval covers and monotonicity of interval resolution global dimensions, J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 9 (2025), no. 2, Paper No. 13, 34. 4908881

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Hideto Asashiba and Amit K Patel, Minimal projective resolutions, M \" o bius inversion, and bottleneck stability , arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15726 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Smal , Representation theory of A rtin algebras , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    Maurice Auslander, Idun Reiten, and Sverre O. Smal , Representation theory of A rtin algebras , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 36, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, Corrected reprint of the 1995 original. 1476671

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Auslander and

    M. Auslander and . Solberg, Relative homology, Finite-dimensional algebras and related topics ( O ttawa, ON , 1992), NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 424, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1994, pp. 347--359. 1308995

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Toshitaka Aoki and Shunsuke Tada, On preservation of relative resolutions for poset representations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21227 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    16 (1975), 125--138

    Kenneth Bac awski, Whitney numbers of geometric lattices, Advances in Math. 16 (1975), 125--138. 387086

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    S. A. Barannikov, The framed M orse complex and its invariants , Singularities and bifurcations, Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 21, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994, pp. 93--115

    work page 1994

  10. [10]

    Ulrich Bauer, Ripser: efficient computation of V ietoris- R ips persistence barcodes , J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 5 (2021), no. 3, 391--423. 4298669

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    H vard Bakke Bjerkevik and Magnus Bakke Botnan, Computing p-presentation distances is hard, Discrete & Computational Geometry (2025), 1--41

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Ulrich Bauer, Magnus Bakke Botnan, and Benedikt Fluhr, Universal distances for extended persistence, J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 8 (2024), no. 3, 475--530. 4799021

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Hanson, Homological approximations in persistence theory, Canad

    Benjamin Blanchette, Thomas Br\" u stle, and Eric J. Hanson, Homological approximations in persistence theory, Canad. J. Math. 76 (2024), no. 1, 66--103. 4687766

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    , Exact structures for persistence modules, Representations of algebras and related topics, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc., Z\" u rich, [2025] 2025, pp. 121--160. 4993173

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    H vard Bakke Bjerkevik, Magnus Bakke Botnan, and Michael Kerber, Computing the interleaving distance is NP -hard , Found. Comput. Math. 20 (2020), no. 5, 1237--1271. 4156997

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    8018, 943--949

    Katherine Benjamin, Aneesha Bhandari, Jessica D Kepple, Rui Qi, Zhouchun Shang, Yanan Xing, Yanru An, Nannan Zhang, Yong Hou, Tanya L Crockford, et al., Multiscale topology classifies cells in subcellular spatial transcriptomics, Nature 630 (2024), no. 8018, 943--949

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Botnan, Steffen Oppermann, and Johan Steen, Cotorsion torsion triples and the representation theory of filtered hierarchical clustering, Adv

    Ulrich Bauer, Magnus B. Botnan, Steffen Oppermann, and Johan Steen, Cotorsion torsion triples and the representation theory of filtered hierarchical clustering, Adv. Math. 369 (2020), 107171, 51. 4091895

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Ulrich Bauer, Magnus Bakke Botnan, Steffen Oppermann, and Johan Steen, On the additive image of 0th persistent homology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09132 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Jacek Brodzki, Matthew Burfitt, and Mariam Pirashvili, On the complexity of zero-dimensional multiparameter persistence, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11532 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Riju Bindua, Thomas Brüstle, and Luis Scoccola, Decomposing zero-dimensional persistent homology over rooted tree quivers, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Catanzaro, Multiparameter persistent homology via generalized M orse theory , Toric topology and polyhedral products, Fields Inst

    Peter Bubenik and Michael J. Catanzaro, Multiparameter persistent homology via generalized M orse theory , Toric topology and polyhedral products, Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 89, Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 55--79

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan and William Crawley-Boevey, Decomposition of persistence modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2020), no. 11, 4581--4596. 4143378

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Alexey Balitskiy, Baris Coskunuzer, and Facundo M\' e moli, Geometric bounds for persistence, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 378 (2025), no. 12, 8437--8486. 4982324

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Fr\' e d\' e ric Chazal, and Mariette Yvinec, Geometric and topological inference, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018. 3837127

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Paul Biran, Octav Cornea, and Jun Zhang, Triangulation, persistence, and fukaya categories, (to appear in) Memoirs of the European Mathematical Society

    work page

  26. [26]

    Benjamin Blanchette, Justin Desrochers, Eric J Hanson, and Luis Scoccola, Stabilization of the spread-global dimension, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01828 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Thomas Br \"u stle, Justin Desrochers, and Samuel Leblanc, Generalized rank via minimal subposet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10837 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Peter Bubenik, Vin de Silva, and Vidit Nanda, Higher interpolation and extension for persistence modules, SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom. 1 (2017), no. 1, 272--284. 3683688

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Peter Bubenik, Vin de Silva, and Jonathan Scott, Metrics for generalized persistence modules, Found. Comput. Math. 15 (2015), no. 6, 1501--1531. 3413628

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Peter Bubenik and Alex Elchesen, Virtual persistence diagrams, signed measures, W asserstein distances, and B anach spaces , J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 6 (2022), no. 4, 429--474. 4496687

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    15 (2013), no

    Paul Bendich, Herbert Edelsbrunner, Dmitriy Morozov, and Amit Patel, Homology and robustness of level and interlevel sets, Homology Homotopy Appl. 15 (2013), no. 1, 51--72. 3031814

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Sigma 11 (2023), Paper No

    Nicolas Berkouk, Persistence and the sheaf-function correspondence, Forum Math. Sigma 11 (2023), Paper No. e113, 20. 4679252

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Ulrich Bauer and Benedikt Fluhr, Relative interlevel set cohomology categorifies extended persistence diagrams, 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Nicolas Berkouk and Gr\' e gory Ginot, A derived isometry theorem for sheaves, Adv. Math. 394 (2022), Paper No. 108033, 39. 4355732

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Alexander Beilinson, Victor Ginzburg, and Wolfgang Soergel, Koszul duality patterns in representation theory, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), no. 2, 473--527. 1322847

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    Ulrich Bauer, Cameron Gusel, and Luis Scoccola, A metrically complete and krull--schmidt space of multiparameter persistence modules, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12049 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    H vard Bakke Bjerkevik, On the stability of interval decomposable persistence modules, Discrete Comput. Geom. 66 (2021), no. 1, 92--121. 4270636

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    H vard Bakke Bjerkevik, Stabilizing decomposition of multiparameter persistence modules, Foundations of Computational Mathematics (2025), 1--60

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Ryan Budney and Tomasz Kaczynski, Bifiltrations and persistence paths for 2- M orse functions , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 23 (2023), no. 6, 2895--2924

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Omer Bobrowski, Matthew Kahle, and Primoz Skraba, Maximally persistent cycles in random geometric complexes, Ann. Appl. Probab. 27 (2017), no. 4, 2032--2060. 3693519

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Ulrich Bauer and Michael Lesnick, Induced matchings and the algebraic stability of persistence barcodes, J. Comput. Geom. 6 (2015), no. 2, 162--191. 3333456

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan and Michael Lesnick, Algebraic stability of zigzag persistence modules, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 18 (2018), no. 6, 3133--3204. 3868218

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Blumberg and Michael Lesnick, Universality of the homotopy interleaving distance, Trans

    Andrew J. Blumberg and Michael Lesnick, Universality of the homotopy interleaving distance, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no. 12, 8269--8307. 4669297

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan and Michael Lesnick, An introduction to multiparameter persistence, Representations of algebras and related structures, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., EMS Press, Berlin, [2023] 2023, pp. 77--150. 4693638

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Blumberg and Michael Lesnick, Stability of 2-parameter persistent homology, Found

    Andrew J. Blumberg and Michael Lesnick, Stability of 2-parameter persistent homology, Found. Comput. Math. 24 (2024), no. 2, 385--427. 4733354

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan, Vadim Lebovici, and Steve Oudot, On rectangle-decomposable 2-parameter persistence modules, Discrete Comput. Geom. 68 (2022), no. 4, 1078--1101. 4517095

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Botnan, Vadim Lebovici, and Steve Oudot, Local characterizations for decomposability of 2-parameter persistence modules, Algebr

    Magnus B. Botnan, Vadim Lebovici, and Steve Oudot, Local characterizations for decomposability of 2-parameter persistence modules, Algebr. Represent. Theory 26 (2023), no. 6, 3003--3046. 4681340

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Ulrich Bauer, Talha Bin Masood, Barbara Giunti, Guillaume Houry, Michael Kerber, and Abhishek Rathod, Keeping it sparse: computing persistent homology revisited, Comput. Geom. Topol. 3 (2024), no. 1, Art. 6, 26. 4842013

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Medina-Mardones, and Maximilian Schmahl, Persistent homology for functionals, Commun

    Ulrich Bauer, Anibal M. Medina-Mardones, and Maximilian Schmahl, Persistent homology for functionals, Commun. Contemp. Math. 26 (2024), no. 10, Paper No. 2350055, 40

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Jonathan Block, Fedor Manin, and Shmuel Weinberger, Persistent homology of function spaces, 2025, arXiv:2501.08867

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan, Steffen Oppermann, and Steve Oudot, Signed barcodes for multi-parameter persistence via rank decompositions and rank-exact resolutions, Found. Comput. Math. 25 (2025), no. 5, 1815--1874. 4983902

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Magnus Bakke Botnan, Steffen Oppermann, Steve Oudot, and Luis Scoccola, On the bottleneck stability of rank decompositions of multi-parameter persistence modules, Adv. Math. 451 (2024), Paper No. 109780, 53. 4761951

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Thomas Br \"u stle, Steve Oudot, Luis Scoccola, and Hugh Thomas, Counts and end-curves in two-parameter persistence, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13412 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Leibniz Int

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat and Siddharth Pritam, Edge collapse and persistence of flag complexes, 36th I nternational S ymposium on C omputational G eometry, LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform., vol. 164, Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz-Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2020, pp. Art. No. 19, 15. 4117732

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Nicolas Berkouk and Fran c ois Petit, Ephemeral persistence modules and distance comparison, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 21 (2021), no. 1, 247--277. 4224741

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Lev Buhovsky, Jordan Payette, Iosif Polterovich, Leonid Polterovich, Egor Shelukhin, and Vuka s in Stojisavljevi \'c , Coarse nodal count and topological persistence, Journal of the European Mathematical Society (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Sigma 12 (2024), Paper No

    Lev Buhovsky, Iosif Polterovich, Leonid Polterovich, Egor Shelukhin, and Vuka s in Stojisavljevi \'c , Persistent transcendental B \'ezout theorems , Forum Math. Sigma 12 (2024), Paper No. e72, 28

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Leibniz Int

    Ulrich Bauer and Fabian Roll, Wrapping cycles in D elaunay complexes: bridging persistent homology and discrete M orse theory , 40th I nternational S ymposium on C omputational G eometry, LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform., vol. 293, Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz-Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2024, pp. Art. No. 15, 16. 4757910

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Scott, Categorification of persistent homology, Discrete Comput

    Peter Bubenik and Jonathan A. Scott, Categorification of persistent homology, Discrete Comput. Geom. 51 (2014), no. 3, 600--627. 3201246

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Omer Bobrowski and Primoz Skraba, Universality in random persistent homology and scale-invariant functionals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05553 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Ulrich Bauer and Luis Scoccola, Multi-parameter persistence modules are generically indecomposable, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2025), no. 5, Paper No. rnaf034, 31. 4870578

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Gunnar Carlsson, Topology and data, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 46 (2009), no. 2, 255--308. 2476414

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    thesis, State University of New York at Albany, 2023

    Robert Cardona, Variations and approximations of interleaving distances, Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Albany, 2023

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Algebra Appl

    William Crawley-Boevey, Decomposition of pointwise finite-dimensional persistence modules, J. Algebra Appl. 14 (2015), no. 5, 1550066, 8. 3323327

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    18 (2016), no

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Chazal, William Crawley-Boevey, and Vin de Silva, The observable structure of persistence modules, Homology Homotopy Appl. 18 (2016), no. 2, 247--265. 3575998

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Leibniz Int

    Robert Cardona, Justin Curry, Tung Lam, and Michael Lesnick, The universal ^p -metric on merge trees , 38th I nternational S ymposium on C omputational G eometry, LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform., vol. 224, Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz-Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2022, pp. Art. No. 24, 20. 4470903

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    237--246

    Fr \'e d \'e ric Chazal, David Cohen-Steiner, Marc Glisse, Leonidas J Guibas, and Steve Y Oudot, Proximity of persistence modules and their diagrams, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual symposium on Computational geometry, 2009, pp. 237--246

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Chazal, Vin de Silva, Marc Glisse, and Steve Oudot, The structure and stability of persistence modules, SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, Springer, [Cham], 2016. 3524869

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Gunnar Carlsson, Vin de Silva, and Dmitriy Morozov, Zigzag persistent homology and real-valued functions, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (New York, NY, USA), SCG '09, Association for Computing Machinery, 2009, p. 247–256

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    Dedicata 173 (2014), 193--214

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Chazal, Vin de Silva, and Steve Oudot, Persistence stability for geometric complexes, Geom. Dedicata 173 (2014), 193--214. 3275299

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Andrea Cerri, Marc Ethier, and Patrizio Frosini, On the geometrical properties of the coherent matching distance in 2 D persistent homology , J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 3 (2019), no. 4, 381--422

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    Guibas, Steve Y

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Chazal, Leonidas J. Guibas, Steve Y. Oudot, and Primoz Skraba, Persistence-based clustering in R iemannian manifolds , J. ACM 60 (2013), no. 6, Art. 41, 38. 3144911

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Wojciech Chach\' o lski, Andrea Guidolin, Isaac Ren, Martina Scolamiero, and Francesca Tombari, Koszul complexes and relative homological algebra of functors over posets, Found. Comput. Math. 25 (2025), no. 4, 1121--1165. 4951524

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Nathaniel Clause, Woojin Kim, and Facundo Memoli, The generalized rank invariant: M " obius invertibility, discriminating power, and connection to other invariants, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11591 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Francesca Cagliari and Claudia Landi, Finiteness of rank invariants of multidimensional persistent homology groups, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011), no. 4, 516--518. 2749737

    work page 2011

  76. [76]

    Women Math

    Erin Wolf Chambers and David Letscher, Persistent homology over directed acyclic graphs, Research in computational topology, Assoc. Women Math. Ser., vol. 13, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 11--32. 3904999

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Gunnar Carlsson and Facundo M\' e moli, Characterization, stability and convergence of hierarchical clustering methods, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 (2010), 1425--1470. 2645457

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    Fr \'e d \'e ric Chazal and Bertrand Michel, An introduction to topological data analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientists, Frontiers in artificial intelligence 4 (2021), 667963

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    J\' e r\' e my Cochoy and Steve Oudot, Decomposition of exact pfd persistence bimodules, Discrete Comput. Geom. 63 (2020), no. 2, 255--293. 4057439

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Carina Curto and Nicole Sanderson, Topological neuroscience: linking circuits to function, Annual Review of Neuroscience 48 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.