pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07187 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dual-Tuned 31P-1H Dual-Row Loop/Dipole 32-element Transceiver Array for Human Brain Spectroscopy at 9.4T

G. A. Solomakha , R. Pohmann , F. Glang , S. Mueller , P. I. Valsala , T. Platt , S. Orzada , M. E. Ladd
show 3 more authors
A. Korzovski K. Scheffler N. I. Avdievich
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords dual-tuned array31P MRS9.4Ttransceiver arraybrain spectroscopyloop dipoleultra-high field MRI
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 32-element loop-dipole array provides full-brain coverage for dual-frequency 31P-1H spectroscopy at 9.4T.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops and tests a single-layer tight-fit 32-element transceiver array that combines loop elements tuned for phosphorus-31 and dipole elements tuned for protons. This design aims to provide complete coverage of the human brain, including the cerebellum and brainstem, while maintaining usable signal quality and transmission efficiency at both frequencies on a 9.4 tesla scanner. A sympathetic reader would care because phosphorus spectroscopy can reveal metabolic information not accessible with standard proton imaging, but it has been limited by poor sensitivity and coverage at ultra-high fields. The work shows that hybrid loop-dipole configurations can overcome some of these hardware constraints without needing multiple layers or separate coils.

Core claim

The authors constructed numerical models of dual-row arrays with loops for 31P and coaxial-end folded-end dipoles for 1H. Using multi-tissue voxel simulations to optimize circularly polarized excitation, they built and tested the 32-element array on phantom and human volunteer. Measurements confirmed full-brain imaging capability with reasonable signal-to-noise ratio and transmit performance at both resonance frequencies, outperforming a prior single-row loop design.

What carries the argument

The 32-element dual-tuned transceiver array using a dual-row configuration with loops for 31P and dipoles for 1H in a tight-fit single layer.

If this is right

  • The array supports full-brain 31P MRS including cerebellum and brainstem at 9.4T.
  • It provides adequate 1H transmit and receive performance for localization and shimming.
  • Performance matches or exceeds previous dual-tuned single-row loop arrays in coverage.
  • The design can be adapted for use at 10.5T, 11.7T, and 14T.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This hybrid approach may simplify multi-nuclear experiments by integrating both frequencies in one setup.
  • Enhanced coverage of deep brain structures could open new avenues for studying metabolic disorders affecting the brainstem.
  • Success here indicates that similar element combinations might help overcome sensitivity challenges as MRI fields increase further.

Load-bearing premise

Numerical electromagnetic simulations using a multi-tissue voxel model accurately predict real-world transmit and receive performance in human subjects without significant discrepancies from unmodeled factors such as cable losses or subject-specific anatomy variations.

What would settle it

Direct in-vivo measurements on a volunteer that show substantially lower transmit efficiency or SNR in the cerebellum and brainstem than predicted by the simulations would disprove the performance claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07187 by A. Korzovski, F. Glang, G. A. Solomakha, K. Scheffler, M. E. Ladd, N. I. Avdievich, P. I. Valsala, R. Pohmann, S. Mueller, S. Orzada, T. Platt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top views of simulation models of the 162 MHz 31P-loop (A) and 400 MHz 1H-dipole (B) arrays in CST Studio 2021. (C) Isometric view of the 32-element DT array. (D) Photo of the constructed DT 32-element TxRx 31P/1H array (FR-4 cover removed) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (A) Simplified electrical circuit of the 32-element TxRx 31P/1H array. S-matrix measured on a healthy volunteer of the proposed array at 162 (B) and 400 (C) MHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows numerically simulated B1 + distributions in the sagittal (central) and transversal (through the B1 + maxima) planes of the Duke voxel model for the 31P double-row loop array with different phase shifts between the rows as indicated in the different subplots. The barplots in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bar plots showing <B1 + /√P> (A), COV (B), pSAR10g (C), and SAR-efficiency (D) obtained numerically for both the proposed 16-element 31P array (with different phase shifts between the rows) and the 31P part of the 20-element reference array (Ref. loops at figure) loaded by the Duke and Ella voxel models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: B1 + distributions simulated in the central sagittal slice and transversal slice through the maximum of B1 + of the Duke voxel model obtained for the dual-row 1H folded-end coaxial￾end dipole array with different phase shifts between rows. Position of the transversal slice is marked with a white dash line. B1 + distribution with the optimal phase shift is marked with a red dashed rectangle. The region of t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (A) Simulated and measured B1 + in the homogenous elliptical phantom in the central sagittal and transversal slice through the maximum of B1 + . (B) Measured CSI-SNR in the homogenous elliptical phantom in the central sagittal and transversal slices. Position of the transversal slice is marked with a white dash line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (A) In-vivo measured B1 + in the central sagittal and transversal slice through the maximum of B1 + . Region used for <B1 +> calculation shown with a white dashed rectangle. (B) Measured in-vivo SNR in central sagittal and transversal slices through the maximum of B1 + . ROIs used for mean SNR calculation shown with dashed ellipses. Position of the transversal slice is marked with a white dash line [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (A) In-vivo anatomical GRE images obtained using the proposed and reference arrays. (B) 31P in-vivo CSI-SNR for the proposed 32- and reference 20-element arrays in a central sagittal (left column) and transversal slice (right column, position indicated by white dashed line). (C) In-vivo 31P spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Purpose The goal of this work is to develop and evaluate a single-layer tight-fit 32-element double-tuned loop/dipole transceiver (TxRx) array for human brain 31P MRS at 9.4T, achieving reasonable transmit and receive performance and full-brain coverage at both frequencies. Methods First, we developed numerical models of dual-row TxRx arrays for 31P (loop array) and 1H (coaxial-end folded-end dipole array) frequencies at 9.4T. Next, a multi-tissue voxel model was used to simulate Tx-performance of the arrays and define optimal CP-mode excitation. Following this, the proposed array performance was evaluated by MR measurements both on a phantom and a healthy volunteer. Finally, we compared the proposed array to a previously reported dual-tuned single-row loop-based TxRx array. Results The developed 32-element double-tuned array demonstrated full-brain (including the cerebellum and brain stem) imaging capabilities, reasonable SNR and transmit performance at both frequencies at 9.4T. Conclusion As a proof of concept, we developed a 32-element double-tuned UHF tight-fit TxRx human head array coil for 31P MRS with sufficient 1H performance using a combination of loop and dipole array elements. The proposed array design could also be adapted to higher fields, i.e., 10.5T, 11.7T, and 14T.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the development of a 32-element dual-tuned 31P-1H transceiver array using a combination of loop and dipole elements in a dual-row configuration for human brain imaging and spectroscopy at 9.4T. Through numerical simulations with a multi-tissue model to optimize CP-mode excitation, followed by phantom and single-volunteer MR measurements, the authors claim that the array achieves full-brain coverage including the cerebellum and brainstem with reasonable transmit and receive performance at both frequencies, and compare it favorably to a prior single-row loop array.

Significance. If the performance claims hold, this work advances RF coil design for ultra-high-field multi-nuclear MRI/MRS by integrating loops and dipoles in a single-layer tight-fit array to achieve improved coverage at 9.4T while maintaining usable 1H imaging alongside 31P spectroscopy. The combined simulation-plus-phantom/volunteer validation approach and explicit comparison to prior hardware provide a concrete basis for assessing trade-offs in transmit efficiency and SNR.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: The central claim of demonstrated full-brain coverage (including cerebellum and brain stem) with reasonable SNR and transmit performance rests on qualitative images and limited metrics from a single phantom and one healthy volunteer. No region-specific quantitative B1+ or SNR maps for deep structures, no multi-subject statistics, and no head-to-head comparison with the prior single-row array under matched conditions are reported, leaving the performance assertions only partially supported.
  2. [Methods] Methods and Results: The multi-tissue voxel model is used to define CP-mode excitation, yet no quantitative assessment of simulation-experiment agreement (e.g., predicted vs. measured B1+ in cerebellum) or sensitivity to unmodeled factors such as cable losses or inter-subject anatomy is provided, which directly affects confidence in the full-brain coverage claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The term 'coaxial-end folded-end dipole array' is ambiguous; clarify the exact dipole geometry (e.g., 'coaxially fed folded dipole elements').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript describing the 32-element dual-tuned loop/dipole array. We have addressed the concerns about the strength of evidence for full-brain coverage by adding quantitative metrics and clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: The central claim of demonstrated full-brain coverage (including cerebellum and brain stem) with reasonable SNR and transmit performance rests on qualitative images and limited metrics from a single phantom and one healthy volunteer. No region-specific quantitative B1+ or SNR maps for deep structures, no multi-subject statistics, and no head-to-head comparison with the prior single-row array under matched conditions are reported, leaving the performance assertions only partially supported.

    Authors: We agree that the evidence is based on a single volunteer and phantom, which is typical for proof-of-concept hardware papers. In the revised manuscript we have extracted and reported region-specific B1+ and SNR values from the cerebellum and brainstem in the volunteer data to provide quantitative support. The comparison to the prior single-row loop array uses published results from that work; a matched-condition head-to-head scan was not possible with the available hardware, but we have clarified the setup differences and the coverage advantage shown in the images. Multi-subject statistics are beyond the scope of this initial study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and Results: The multi-tissue voxel model is used to define CP-mode excitation, yet no quantitative assessment of simulation-experiment agreement (e.g., predicted vs. measured B1+ in cerebellum) or sensitivity to unmodeled factors such as cable losses or inter-subject anatomy is provided, which directly affects confidence in the full-brain coverage claim.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised manuscript now includes a quantitative comparison of simulated versus measured B1+ distributions, with explicit values reported for the cerebellum. We have also added a sensitivity analysis to cable losses in the simulations and a brief discussion of inter-subject anatomical variability as a limitation of the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; claims rest on independent measurements

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from numerical EM modeling of the array geometry, through standard multi-tissue voxel simulations used only to select CP-mode excitation weights, to direct MR measurements on a phantom and one volunteer that independently assess SNR, B1+, and coverage. These measurements are not derived from or forced by the simulation inputs; they constitute separate empirical data. The comparison to a prior single-row array is a side-by-side reporting of measured results rather than a self-referential reduction. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear that would make the central performance claims equivalent to their own inputs by construction. The workflow is a conventional simulation-guided hardware validation and therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work depends on standard electromagnetic simulation assumptions and experimental validation rather than new theoretical derivations or invented physical entities.

free parameters (1)
  • Array geometry and tuning parameters
    Element sizes, positions, and matching networks optimized via simulation for CP-mode at both frequencies.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Multi-tissue voxel model accurately represents human head dielectric properties at 9.4T for transmit field prediction.
    Invoked to simulate Tx-performance and define optimal excitation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5627 in / 1253 out tokens · 68165 ms · 2026-05-10T18:01:42.263817+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application

    Ladd ME, Bachert P, Meyerspeer M, et al. Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2018;109:1-

    2018

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001 2018

  3. [3]

    Broadband proton decoupled natural abundance13 C NMR spectroscopy of humans at 1.5 T

    Heerschap A, Luyten PR, Van Der Heyden JI, Oosterwaal LJMP, Hollander JAD. Broadband proton decoupled natural abundance13 C NMR spectroscopy of humans at 1.5 T. NMR Biomed. 1989;2(3):124-132. doi:10.1002/nbm.1940020309

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.1940020309 1989

  4. [4]

    Broadband proton decoupling in human31 p NMR spectroscopy

    Luyten PR, Bruntink G, Sloff FM, et al. Broadband proton decoupling in human31 p NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1989;1(4):177-183. doi:10.1002/nbm.1940010405

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.1940010405 1989

  5. [5]

    Efficient1 H to31 P polarization transfer on a clinical 3T MR system

    Klomp DWJ, Wijnen JP , Scheenen TWJ, Heerschap A. Efficient1 H to31 P polarization transfer on a clinical 3T MR system. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(6):1298-1305. doi:10.1002/mrm.21733

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.21733 2008

  6. [6]

    In Vivo13 C imaging enhanced by polarization transfer

    Ueshima Y, Yamai S, Ikehira H, et al. In Vivo13 C imaging enhanced by polarization transfer. Magn Reson Med. 1990;15(1):158-164. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910150118 20

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.1910150118 1990

  7. [7]

    Transceiver-Phased Arrays for Human Brain Studies at 7 T

    Avdievich NI. Transceiver-Phased Arrays for Human Brain Studies at 7 T. Appl Magn Reson. 2011;41(2-4):483-506. doi:10.1007/s00723-011-0280-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00723-011-0280-y 2011

  8. [8]

    Design of a nested eight‐channel sodium and four‐channel proton coil for 7T knee imaging

    Brown R, Madelin G, Lattanzi R, et al. Design of a nested eight‐channel sodium and four‐channel proton coil for 7T knee imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(1):259-268. doi:10.1002/mrm.24432

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.24432 2013

  9. [9]

    A transmit-only/receive-only (TORO) RF system for high-field MRI/MRS applications

    Barberi EA, Gati JS, Rutt BK, Menon RS. A transmit-only/receive-only (TORO) RF system for high-field MRI/MRS applications. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43(2):284-289. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200002)43:2%3C284::AID- MRM16%3E3.0.CO;2-C

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200002)43:2 2000

  10. [10]

    Transceive surface coil array for magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 4 T

    Pinkerton RG, Barberi EA, Menon RS. Transceive surface coil array for magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(2):499-

    2005

  11. [11]

    doi:10.1002/mrm.20583

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.20583

  12. [12]

    Three‐layered radio frequency coil arrangement for sodium MRI of the human brain at 9.4 Tesla

    Shajan G, Mirkes C, Buckenmaier K, Hoffmann J, Pohmann R, Scheffler K. Three‐layered radio frequency coil arrangement for sodium MRI of the human brain at 9.4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(2):906-916. doi:10.1002/mrm.25666

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.25666 2016

  13. [13]

    31P CSI of the human brain in healthy subjects and tumor patients at 9.4 T with a three-layered multi-nuclear coil: initial results

    Mirkes C, Shajan G, Chadzynski G, Buckenmaier K, Bender B, Scheffler K. 31P CSI of the human brain in healthy subjects and tumor patients at 9.4 T with a three-layered multi-nuclear coil: initial results. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2016;29(3):579-589. doi:10.1007/s10334-016-0524-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10334-016-0524-9 2016

  14. [14]

    A flexible nested sodium and proton coil array with wideband matching for knee cartilage MRI at 3T

    Brown R, Lakshmanan K, Madelin G, et al. A flexible nested sodium and proton coil array with wideband matching for knee cartilage MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76(4):1325-1334. doi:10.1002/mrm.26017

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.26017 2016

  15. [15]

    A nested phosphorus and proton coil array for brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy

    Brown R, Lakshmanan K, Madelin G, Parasoglou P . A nested phosphorus and proton coil array for brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. NeuroImage. 2016;124:602-611. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.066

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.066 2016

  16. [16]

    Double‐ tuned 31P/1H human head array with high performance at both frequencies for spectroscopic imaging at 9.4T

    Avdievich NI, Ruhm L, Dorst J, Scheffler K, Korzowski A, Henning A. Double‐ tuned 31P/1H human head array with high performance at both frequencies for spectroscopic imaging at 9.4T. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84(2):1076-1089. doi:10.1002/mrm.28176

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.28176 2020

  17. [17]

    Decoupling of a double-row 16-element tight-fit transceiver phased array for human whole-brain imaging at 9.4 T

    Avdievich NI, Giapitzakis IA, Pfrommer A, Shajan G, Scheffler K, Henning A. Decoupling of a double-row 16-element tight-fit transceiver phased array for human whole-brain imaging at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(9):e3964. doi:10.1002/nbm.3964

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.3964 2018

  18. [18]

    Evaluation of transmit efficiency and SAR for a tight fit transceiver human head phased array at 9.4 T

    Avdievich NI, Hoffmann J, Shajan G, et al. Evaluation of transmit efficiency and SAR for a tight fit transceiver human head phased array at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(2). doi:10.1002/nbm.3680

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.3680 2017

  19. [19]

    A 7T 8 channel transmit-receive dipole array for head imaging: dipole element and coil evaluation

    Chen G, Cloos M, Sodickson D, Wiggins G. A 7T 8 channel transmit-receive dipole array for head imaging: dipole element and coil evaluation. In: Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 22. 2014:0621. 21

    2014

  20. [20]

    A combined 32‐channel receive‐loops/8‐channel transmit‐dipoles coil array for whole‐brain MR imaging at 7T

    Clément J, Gruetter R, Ipek Ö. A combined 32‐channel receive‐loops/8‐channel transmit‐dipoles coil array for whole‐brain MR imaging at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82(3):1229-1241. doi:10.1002/mrm.27808

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.27808 2019

  21. [21]

    dielectric resonance

    Avdievich NI, Solomakha G, Ruhm L, Bause J, Scheffler K, Henning A. Bent folded‐end dipole head array for ultrahigh‐field MRI turns “dielectric resonance” from an enemy to a friend. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84(6):3453-3467. doi:10.1002/mrm.28336

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.28336 2020

  22. [22]

    Unshielded bent folded‐end dipole 9.4 T human head transceiver array decoupled using modified passive dipoles

    Avdievich NI, Solomakha G, Ruhm L, Henning A, Scheffler K. Unshielded bent folded‐end dipole 9.4 T human head transceiver array decoupled using modified passive dipoles. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86(1):581-597. doi:10.1002/mrm.28711

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.28711 2021

  23. [23]

    9.4 T double‐tuned 13C/1H human head array using a combination of surface loops and dipole antennas

    Avdievich NI, Solomakha G, Ruhm L, Henning A, Scheffler K. 9.4 T double‐tuned 13C/1H human head array using a combination of surface loops and dipole antennas. NMR Biomed. 2021;34(10). doi:10.1002/nbm.4577

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.4577 2021

  24. [24]

    Double-Row 16- element Folded-End Dipole Transceiver Array for Human Whole Brain Imaging at 9.4T

    Nikulin AV, Bosch D, Solomakha G, Scheffler K, Avdievich NI. Double-Row 16- element Folded-End Dipole Transceiver Array for Human Whole Brain Imaging at 9.4T. NMR Biomed. 2023;n/a(n/a):e4981. doi:10.1002/nbm.4981

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.4981 2023

  25. [25]

    Transceiver 16‐Channel Coaxial‐End Dipole Array for Combined Head and C‐Spine MRI at 9.4 T

    Solomakha GA, Glang F, May MW, et al. Transceiver 16‐Channel Coaxial‐End Dipole Array for Combined Head and C‐Spine MRI at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2026;39(3):e70228. doi:10.1002/nbm.70228

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.70228 2026

  26. [26]

    Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves

    Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG, et al. The Virtual Family—development of surface- based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(2):N23-N38. doi:10.1088/0031- 9155/55/2/N01

    work page doi:10.1088/0031- 2010

  27. [27]

    Evaluation of coaxial dipole antennas as transceiver elements of human head array for ultra‐ high field MRI at 9.4T

    Solomakha GA, Bosch D, Glang F, Scheffler K, Avdievich NI. Evaluation of coaxial dipole antennas as transceiver elements of human head array for ultra‐ high field MRI at 9.4T. Magn Reson Med. Published online November 27, 2023:mrm.29941. doi:10.1002/mrm.29941

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.29941 2023

  28. [28]

    Floating shield current suppression trap

    Seeber DA, Jevtic J, Menon A. Floating shield current suppression trap. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng. 2004;21B(1):26-31. doi:10.1002/cmr.b.20008

    work page doi:10.1002/cmr.b.20008 2004

  29. [29]

    Quick measurement of NMR-coil sensitivity with a dual- loop probe

    Darrasse L, Kassab G. Quick measurement of NMR-coil sensitivity with a dual- loop probe. Rev Sci Instrum. 1993;64(7):1841-1844. doi:10.1063/1.1144020

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1144020 1993

  30. [30]

    Imaging of the active B1 field in vivo

    Stollberger R, Wach P. Imaging of the active B1 field in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35(2):246-251. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350217

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350217 1996

  31. [31]

    Actual flip‐angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three‐dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field

    Yarnykh VL. Actual flip‐angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three‐dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(1):192-200. doi:10.1002/mrm.21120 22

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.21120 2007

  32. [32]

    Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement†

    Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement†. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(6):1439-1447. doi:10.1002/mrm.20713

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.20713 2005

  33. [33]

    Receive array magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Whitened singular value decomposition (WSVD) gives optimal Bayesian solution

    Rodgers CT, Robson MD. Receive array magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Whitened singular value decomposition (WSVD) gives optimal Bayesian solution. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(4):881-891. doi:10.1002/mrm.22230

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.22230 2010

  34. [34]

    Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application

    Kay SM. Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application. Prentice Hall; 1988

    1988

  35. [35]

    Noise figure limits for circular loop MR coils

    Kumar A, Edelstein WA, Bottomley PA. Noise figure limits for circular loop MR coils. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(5):1201-1209. doi:10.1002/mrm.21948

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.21948 2009

  36. [36]

    Evaluation of short folded dipole antennas as receive elements of ultra-high-field human head array

    Avdievich NI, Solomakha G, Ruhm L, Scheffler K, Henning A. Evaluation of short folded dipole antennas as receive elements of ultra-high-field human head array. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82(2):811-824. doi:10.1002/mrm.27754

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.27754 2019

  37. [37]

    A combined electric dipole and loop head coil for 7T head imaging

    Chen G, Lakshmanan K, Sodickson D, Wiggins G. A combined electric dipole and loop head coil for 7T head imaging. In: Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23. 2015:3133

    2015

  38. [38]

    Double-row dipole/loop combined array for human whole brain imaging at 7 T

    Avdievich NI, Nikulin AV, Ruhm L, Magill AW, Henning A, Scheffler K. Double-row dipole/loop combined array for human whole brain imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2022;35(10):e4773. doi:10.1002/nbm.4773

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.4773 2022

  39. [39]

    The ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio of loop‐ and dipole‐like current patterns in a realistic human head model

    Pfrommer A, Henning A. The ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio of loop‐ and dipole‐like current patterns in a realistic human head model. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80(5):2122-2138. doi:10.1002/mrm.27169 23 Supp. Table 1. Numerically calculated Tx efficiency (mean B 1+ over the brain, normalized to the square root of the stimulated power), pSAR10g, SAR-eff...

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.27169 2018