pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07579 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🧮 math.PR · math.AT

Topology of Percolation Clusters: Central Limit Theorems beyond the Lattice

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR math.AT
keywords percolationcentral limit theoremquasi-transitive graphssubexponential growthBetti numbersamenable groupsmartingale decompositionstabilization
0
0 comments X

The pith

The number of open percolation clusters intersecting a growing ball satisfies a central limit theorem on quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes central limit theorems for topological functionals of Bernoulli bond percolation on infinite graphs that go beyond the standard lattice. It proves that the count of open clusters touching the metric ball of radius r becomes normally distributed after centering and scaling as r grows, for quasi-transitive graphs with subexponential growth. A broader result covers stationary functionals along Følner sequences on amenable Cayley graphs, under stabilization and moment conditions when the group has a left-orderable finite-index subgroup. The approach is applied to obtain limit theorems for Betti numbers in random simplicial complexes built from the percolation. These findings allow analysis of random cluster topology on a wider class of underlying structures than previously available.

Core claim

For quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth, the number K_r of open clusters intersecting the metric ball B_r satisfies a CLT as r→∞. For amenable Cayley graphs, a general CLT holds for stationary percolation functionals along Følner sequences under sequential stabilization and finite-moment assumptions, provided the group admits a left-orderable finite-index subgroup. This applies in particular to groups of polynomial growth. As an application, CLTs are obtained for Betti numbers of graph-generated random simplicial complexes, including clique and neighbor complexes.

What carries the argument

Martingale decompositions arising from invariant edge orderings, together with stabilization estimates that control the effect of single-edge perturbations.

Load-bearing premise

The graph is quasi-transitive with subexponential growth (or an amenable Cayley graph admitting a left-orderable finite-index subgroup) and the functional obeys sequential stabilization plus finite-moment conditions.

What would settle it

Numerical sampling of the normalized cluster count K_r on a concrete quasi-transitive graph of polynomial growth that shows the distribution failing to approach a standard normal for large r.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07579 by Cristian F. Coletti, Daniel Miranda Machado, Luciano H. L. de Ara\'ujo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Realization of a 1-simplex, a 2-simplex and a 3-simplex of cliques highlighted in a graph. Example 2.2. We say that σ is a neighbor simplex of the graph G if σ ⊆ {v} ∪ NG(v), for some v ∈ V . The neighbor simplicial complex of G is then defined as the collection of all such neighbor simplices in G. Example 2.3 (Weighted Vietoris–Rips complexes). Let G = (V, E) be a locally finite, quasi￾transitive graph wi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of Dr(e, 4) event in Z 2 . Now, we need the following lemma. Lemma 4.2. Let f be the growth function of a quasi-transitive graph. The function f has subexponential growth if and only if there exists a function g : N → N satisfying the following conditions: 1. limr→∞ g(r) = ∞; 2. 0 < g(r) < r for all sufficiently large r; 3. limr→∞ f(r) − f(r − g(r)) f(r) = 0. 4. For any fixed k ≥ 0, limr→∞ f(2g(r)+… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of Jr(e, 4) event. ∂B4(x1(e)) x1(e) x2(e) e C ′ 4 (x1(e)) C ′ 4 (x2(e)) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lexicographic martingale filtration on Z 2 : the preceding edges (blue) represent the history Fj−1, the red edge is the current edge ej , and the gray edges are the succeed￾ing. The dashed diamond is the dG-ball (graph-distance ball) around ej , depicting the stabilization neighborhood. Note that for each r > 0, since F(Ar) depends only on the edges within Ar, it is independent of any edges outside Ar that… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We prove central limit theorems (CLTs) for topological functionals of Bernoulli bond percolation on infinite graphs beyond the Euclidean lattice $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$. For quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth, we show that the number $K_{r}$ of open clusters intersecting the metric ball $B_{r}$ satisfies a CLT as $r\to\infty$. For amenable Cayley graphs, we prove a general CLT for stationary percolation functionals along Folner sequences under sequential stabilization and a finite-moment assumption, provided the group admits a left-orderable finite-index subgroup. This applies in particular to groups of polynomial growth. As an application, we obtain CLTs for Betti numbers of graph-generated random simplicial complexes, including clique and neighbor complexes. The proofs combine invariant edge orderings, martingale decompositions, and stabilization estimates for single-edge perturbations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves central limit theorems for topological functionals of Bernoulli bond percolation on infinite graphs. For quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth, the number K_r of open clusters intersecting the metric ball B_r satisfies a CLT as r→∞. For amenable Cayley graphs admitting a left-orderable finite-index subgroup, a general CLT holds for stationary percolation functionals along Følner sequences, assuming sequential stabilization and finite-moment conditions; this applies in particular to groups of polynomial growth. The results are applied to obtain CLTs for Betti numbers of graph-generated random simplicial complexes (clique and neighbor complexes). Proofs combine invariant edge orderings, martingale decompositions, and stabilization estimates for single-edge perturbations.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work meaningfully extends percolation CLTs from Euclidean lattices to quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth and amenable Cayley graphs, providing a general framework under explicit hypotheses (sequential stabilization, finite moments, left-orderable finite-index subgroups). The martingale approach with invariant orderings and the application to Betti numbers of random simplicial complexes are notable strengths, offering tools for topological properties of percolation clusters beyond Z^d.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.3] §2.3: the definition of sequential stabilization for functionals could be illustrated with a concrete example (e.g., the cluster-counting functional K_r) to clarify how the single-edge perturbation bound is verified.
  2. [Theorem 4.1] Theorem 4.1: the finite-moment assumption (E[|X_e|^p]<∞ for p>2) is stated but the precise value of p used in the martingale variance bound is not cross-referenced to the stabilization estimate in Lemma 3.4.
  3. The paper would benefit from a short remark comparing the left-orderable-subgroup hypothesis to existing results on invariant orderings in amenable groups (e.g., references to works on left-orderable groups in percolation).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive evaluation of our work. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the significance of extending central limit theorems for percolation functionals beyond Euclidean lattices to quasi-transitive graphs of subexponential growth and amenable Cayley graphs, as well as the applications to Betti numbers of random simplicial complexes. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, but the report does not raise any specific major comments requiring response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper is a pure mathematical existence proof establishing conditional central limit theorems for percolation functionals under explicitly listed hypotheses (quasi-transitive subexponential growth, amenability plus left-orderable finite-index subgroup, sequential stabilization, and finite-moment bounds). These hypotheses are used to derive martingale decompositions and stabilization estimates directly from the problem setup, with no data fitting, no self-referential parameter estimation, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the claimed results to their own inputs by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The work rests on standard background results in percolation theory, martingale theory, and geometric group theory.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Bernoulli bond percolation is well-defined on any locally finite graph and the cluster-counting functional is measurable.
    Implicit in the statement of the CLT for K_r.
  • standard math Martingale decomposition and stabilization estimates apply under the stated growth and amenability conditions.
    Central to the proof sketch in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1229 out tokens · 39556 ms · 2026-05-10T16:57:10.380646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Number 2 in CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

    Gilbert Baumslag.Lecture Notes on Nilpotent Groups. Number 2 in CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 1971

  2. [2]

    Percolation beyondZd, many questions and a few answers.Electronic Communications in Probability, 1:71–82, 1996

    Itai Benjamini and Oded Schramm. Percolation beyondZd, many questions and a few answers.Electronic Communications in Probability, 1:71–82, 1996

  3. [3]

    Topology of random geometric complexes: a survey.Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, 1(3–4):331–364, 2018

    Omer Bobrowski and Matthew Kahle. Topology of random geometric complexes: a survey.Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, 1(3–4):331–364, 2018

  4. [4]

    Orderable groups minicourse notes, 2023

    Adam Clay. Orderable groups minicourse notes, 2023. Lecture notes. 30

  5. [5]

    D. R. Cox and G. R. Grimmett. Central limit theorems for associated random variables and the percolation model.The Annals of Probability, 12:514–528, 1984

  6. [6]

    Cambridge University Press, 5 edition, 2019

    Rick Durrett.Probability: Theory and Examples, volume 49 ofCambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 5 edition, 2019

  7. [7]

    Springer, 2011

    Manfred Einsiedler and Thomas Ward.Ergodic Theory with a View Towards Number Theory, volume 259 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2011

  8. [8]

    An introduction to amenable groups, 2013

    Alejandra Garrido. An introduction to amenable groups, 2013. Lecture notes

  9. [9]

    Grigorchuk

    Rostislav I. Grigorchuk. Degrees of growth of finitely generated groups, and the theory of invariant means.Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 25(2):259–300, 1985

  10. [10]

    Grimmett.Percolation, volume 321 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften

    Geoffrey R. Grimmett.Percolation, volume 321 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 edition, 1999

  11. [11]

    Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps (with an appendix by Jacques Tits).Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 53:53–78, 1981

    Michael Gromov. Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps (with an appendix by Jacques Tits).Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 53:53–78, 1981

  12. [12]

    Limit theorems for persistence diagrams.The Annals of Applied Probability, 28(5):2740–2780, 2018

    Yasuaki Hiraoka, Tomoyuki Shirai, and Khanh Duy Trinh. Limit theorems for persistence diagrams.The Annals of Applied Probability, 28(5):2740–2780, 2018

  13. [13]

    Topology of random clique complexes.Discrete Mathematics, 309(6):1658–1671, 2009

    Matthew Kahle. Topology of random clique complexes.Discrete Mathematics, 309(6):1658–1671, 2009

  14. [14]

    Limit theorems for Betti numbers of random simplicial complexes.Homology, Homotopy and Applications, 15(1):343–374, 2013

    Matthew Kahle and Elizabeth Meckes. Limit theorems for Betti numbers of random simplicial complexes.Homology, Homotopy and Applications, 15(1):343–374, 2013

  15. [15]

    Kargapolov and Jurij I

    Mikhail I. Kargapolov and Jurij I. Merzljakov.Fundamentals of the Theory of Groups, volume 62 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 1979

  16. [16]

    The probability of a large finite cluster in supercritical Bernoulli percolation.The Annals of Probability, 18:537–555, 1990

    Harry Kesten and Yu Zhang. The probability of a large finite cluster in supercritical Bernoulli percolation.The Annals of Probability, 18:537–555, 1990

  17. [17]

    A central limit theorem for critical first-passage percolation in two dimensions.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 107:137–160, 1997

    Harry Kesten and Yu Zhang. A central limit theorem for critical first-passage percolation in two dimensions.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 107:137–160, 1997

  18. [18]

    Functional central limit theorems for persistent Betti numbers on cylindrical networks.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 49(1):427–454, 2022

    Johannes Krebs and Christian Hirsch. Functional central limit theorems for persistent Betti numbers on cylindrical networks.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 49(1):427–454, 2022

  19. [19]

    On the asymptotic normality of persistent Betti numbers.Advances in Applied Probability, 57(2):492–523, 2025

    Johannes Krebs and Wolfgang Polonik. On the asymptotic normality of persistent Betti numbers.Advances in Applied Probability, 57(2):492–523, 2025

  20. [20]

    Normalapproximationforsta- bilizing functionals in stochastic geometry.The Annals of Applied Probability, 29(2):931– 993, 2019

    RaphaëlLachièze-Rey, MatthiasSchulte, andJ.E.Yukich. Normalapproximationforsta- bilizing functionals in stochastic geometry.The Annals of Applied Probability, 29(2):931– 993, 2019

  21. [21]

    Cambridge University Press, 2017

    Russell Lyons and Yuval Peres.Probability on Trees and Networks, volume 42 ofCam- bridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2017

  22. [22]

    Donald L. McLeish. Dependent central limit theorems and invariance principles.The Annals of Probability, 2(4):620–628, 1974

  23. [23]

    Problem no

    John Milnor. Problem no. 5603.The American Mathematical Monthly, 75(6):685–687, 1968. 31

  24. [24]

    Limit theorems for high-dimensional Betti numbers in the multiparameter random simplicial complexes.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 186:104641, 2025

    Takashi Owada and Gennady Samorodnitsky. Limit theorems for high-dimensional Betti numbers in the multiparameter random simplicial complexes.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 186:104641, 2025

  25. [25]

    Takashi Owada and Andrew M. Thomas. Limit theorems for process-level Betti numbers for sparse and critical regimes.Advances in Applied Probability, 52(1):1–31, 2020

  26. [26]

    Mathew D. Penrose. A Central Limit Theorem With Applications to Percolation, Epi- demics and Boolean Models.The Annals of Probability, 29(4):1515 – 1546, 2001

  27. [27]

    Penrose and Yuval Peres

    Mathew D. Penrose and Yuval Peres. Local Central Limit Theorems in Stochastic Ge- ometry.Electronic Journal of Probability, 16(91):2509–2544, 2011

  28. [28]

    Yogeshwaran

    Agnishom Reddy, Sunderesh Vadlamani, and D. Yogeshwaran. Central limit theorem for exponentially quasi-local statistics of spin models on Cayley graphs.Journal of Statistical Physics, 173(1):18–36, 2018

  29. [29]

    Remarks on Central Limit Theorems for the Num- ber of Percolation Clusters.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sci- ences, 42(1):101–116, 2006

    Nobuaki Sugimine and Masato Takei. Remarks on Central Limit Theorems for the Num- ber of Percolation Clusters.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sci- ences, 42(1):101–116, 2006

  30. [30]

    Number 138 in Cam- bridge Tracts in Mathematics

    Wolfgang Woess.Random Walks on Infinite Graphs and Groups. Number 138 in Cam- bridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2000

  31. [31]

    Yogeshwaran, Eliran Subag, and Robert J

    D. Yogeshwaran, Eliran Subag, and Robert J. Adler. Random geometric complexes in the thermodynamic regime.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 167(1–2):107–142, 2017

  32. [32]

    A martingale approach in the study of percolation clusters on theZd lattice

    Yu Zhang. A martingale approach in the study of percolation clusters on theZd lattice. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 14:165–187, 2001. 32